Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Snap 1 Evidence Sonali

    Uploaded by

    Prashant Mishra
    This document discusses the legal doctrine of Res Gestae. [1] It provides context for Res Gestae from Section 6 of an act and defines it as facts forming part of the same transaction, whether they occurred at the same or different times and places. [2] It then gives an illustration of how statements made during a beating would be considered part of the same transaction and thus admissible. [3] Essential aspects of Res Gestae and related case examples are provided to illustrate how it determines whether facts are considered relevant.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Snap 1 Evidence Sonali

    Uploaded by

    Prashant Mishra
    7 views2 pages
    This document discusses the legal doctrine of Res Gestae. [1] It provides context for Res Gestae from Section 6 of an act and defines it as facts forming part of the same transaction, whether they occurred at the same or different times and places. [2] It then gives an illustration of how statements made during a beating would be considered part of the same transaction and thus admissible. [3] Essential aspects of Res Gestae and related case examples are provided to illustrate how it determines whether facts are considered relevant.

    Original Description:

    Informative questions

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document discusses the legal doctrine of Res Gestae. [1] It provides context for Res Gestae from Section 6 of an act and defines it as facts forming part of the same transaction, whether they occurred at the same or different times and places. [2] It then gives an illustration of how statements made during a beating would be considered part of the same transaction and thus admissible. [3] Essential aspects of Res Gestae and related case examples are provided to illustrate how it determines whether facts are considered relevant.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    7 views2 pages

    Snap 1 Evidence Sonali

    Uploaded by

    Prashant Mishra
    This document discusses the legal doctrine of Res Gestae. [1] It provides context for Res Gestae from Section 6 of an act and defines it as facts forming part of the same transaction, whether they occurred at the same or different times and places. [2] It then gives an illustration of how statements made during a beating would be considered part of the same transaction and thus admissible. [3] Essential aspects of Res Gestae and related case examples are provided to illustrate how it determines whether facts are considered relevant.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    SnapTest

    -1
    LawofEv
    idence
    BY:SONALITRI
    PATHI
    I
    UU19BAL060

    Quest
    ion1:
    -Cr
    it
    ical
    lyanal
    yzet
    hedoct
    ri
    neofResGest
    aei
    nthechangi
    ng
    t
    imes.Expl
    ainoneofy
    ourownhy
    pot
    het
    icali
    nst
    ancesf
    ort
    heshowi
    ngt
    he
    appl
    icat
    ion&scopeoft
    hisdoct
    ri
    ne.

    (
    Mar
    ks5)

    Sect
    ion6oft heactt al
    ksaboutResGest ae.Itsaysrelevancyoffactsfor
    mingpartof
    sametransact
    ion.Factswhichdonoti ni
    ssuearesoconnect edwiththefacti
    nissueso
    astoform partofthesamet ransact
    ionaretheydif
    ferentwhethertheyoccur
    redatthe
    sametimeandpl aceordif
    ferentti
    mesandpl aces.

    I
    ll
    ust
    rat
    ion:
    -

    a)AisaccusedofmurderofAbybeati
    nghi
    m whatev
    erhassaidordonebyAorBor
    thest
    andar
    dsatthebeati
    ngorsoshor
    tl
    yoraf
    teri
    tastof
    orm partoft
    hetr
    ansact
    ioni
    s
    arel
    evantf
    act.

    Essent
    ial
    sofResGest
    ae:

    1)Fact
    sconnect
    edwi
    thf
    acti
    nissue

    Case:
    Rat
    tanv
    .Queen

    Al adycall
    edtel
    ephoneoperat
    orandut t
    eredgetmet hepol
    iceandsuddenlycal
    l
    droppedShewasfounddeadandherhusbandbei
    ngpr
    osecut
    edatthecour
    tformur
    der
    ofthelady
    .

    Thecourtsai
    dt hecal
    lwasar el
    evantfactandcanbepr
    esent
    edbef
    oret
    hecour
    t.I
    t
    doesn'
    tmatt
    ertheactoccuratsameplaceornot.
    2)SameTr
    ansact
    ion.

    SirJamesStepheninhisbooksdi gestofev
    idencehi
    mselfdef
    inedt
    hewor
    dsame
    tr
    ansact
    ion.I
    tmeanstheser
    iesofactstowhi
    chyoucangiv
    eonename.

    3)Samet
    imeandsamepl
    aceanddi
    ff
    erentt
    imeanddi
    ff
    erentpl
    ace.

    Except
    ion:
    ther
    eshoul
    dbenotbeaconcocat
    ingst
    ory
    .

    Case:
    Rv.Bedi
    ngFi
    eld

    Aladycameoutofherhome.Shehadani
    njur
    yonherneckandsheut
    ter
    ed"
    seemy
    aunt
    ywhatr
    edi
    ngfi
    eldhasdonetome"
    .

    Thecourtsai
    dshehasgetsuff
    ici
    enttimet oconcoctt
    hest
    atementasi
    twasaf
    ter
    someti
    meofcomingauntandi
    tisnotadmissi
    ble.

    Real
    li
    feI
    ll
    ust
    rat
    ion:
    Once2ofmyneighborsstart
    edf i
    ght
    ingoverani
    ssueofl
    and.Oneofthem sai
    dthatI
    '
    ll
    ki
    llyoui
    fyouint
    erf
    ereinmyl andandaftersometi
    meshebr i
    ngsoutaknifefr
    om hi
    s
    houseandst
    abstheotherperson.
    Her
    e,hi
    sst
    atementi
    sal
    sopar
    tofsamet
    ransact
    ion.

    You might also like