Cs Armina

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

ATENEO DE DAVAO UNIVERSITY

School of Business and Governance


MGT 4259 – STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Peer Evaluation on the Assigned Group Tasks

Section and Group Number: _______________________


Report Title/Case Title: ____________________
Date of Submission: ______________________

5 = Excellent work; was crucial component to group’s success


4 = Very strong work; contributed significantly to group
3 = Sufficient effort; contributed adequately to group
2 = Insufficient effort; met minimal standards of group

1 = Little or weak effort; was detrimental to group


An assessment of “1” or “0”requires a written explanation.

Team Name Rating for Quantity of


Member No Rating for Quality of
Contribution (0-5)
Contribution (0-5)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

GROUP
LEADER

SELF
Self-Reflection
What did you learn from the experience?

What do you think went well?

What would you have done differently, given the opportunity? Do you have any other comments or
suggestions about the project?

Submitted by:

________________
Date: ______________________

You might also like