Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 3-Development
Module 3-Development
Module 3-Development
CONTENTS
Social Development
Economic Development
Human Development
Social Development
Qualitative changes in the structure and framework of society.
The HDI was created to emphasize that people and their capabilities should
be the ultimate criteria for assessing the development of a country, not
economic growth alone.
The HDI is the geometric mean of normalized indices for each of the three
dimensions.
India and its neighbours
Income Approach
Welfare Approach
Basic Needs Approach
Capability Approach
Sustainable development
Environmental Sustainability:
It prevents nature from being used as an inexhaustible source of resources and
ensures its protection and rational use.
Aspects such as environmental conservation, investment in renewable energy,
saving water, supporting sustainable mobility, and innovation in sustainable
construction and architecture, contribute to achieving environmental sustainability
on several fronts.
Social Sustainability:
It can foster gender equality, development of people, communities and cultures
to help achieve a reasonable and fairly-distributed quality of life, healthcare and
education across the Globe.
Economic Sustainability:
Focuses on equal economic growth that generates wealth for all, without
harming the environment.
Investment and equal distribution of economic resources.
Eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions.
Planning Commission of India
Formulating plans for the most effective and balanced utilisation of resources
First FYP mainly addressed the agrarian sector, including investment in dams and
irrigation.
The target growth rate was 2.1% and the achieved growth rate was 3.6%.
Second FYP (1956-1961)
The Second Five year Plan stressed rapid industrialisation and the public sector.
The government imposed tariffs on imports to protect domestic industries under this
plan.
The target growth rate was 4.5% and the actual growth rate was slightly less than
expected, 4.27%.
Third FYP (1961- 1966)
The focus was on agriculture and improvement in the production of wheat.
The target growth rate was 5.6% and the actual growth rate only achieved 2.4%
This indicated a miserable failure of the Third Plan, and the government had to
declare "Plan Holidays" (1966-67, 1967-68, and 1968-69).
The Sino-Indian War and the Indo-Pak War, which caused the Third Five Year Plan
to fail, were the primary causes of the plan holidays.
Fourth FYP (1969-1974)
It was introduced under the Prime Ministership of Indira Gandhi and attempted to
correct the previous failures.
The target growth rate was 5.6%, but the actual growth rate was 3.3%.
Fifth FYP (1974-1978)
It laid stress on increasing employment and poverty alleviation (garibi hatao).
The Minimum Needs Programme introduced in the first year of this plan, aimed to
provide basic minimum needs. MNP was prepared by D.P. Dhar.
The target growth rate was 4.4% and the actual growth rate turned out to be 4.8%
In 1978, the newly elected Morarji Desai government rejected this plan.
Sixth FYP (1980-85)
The target growth rate was 5.2% and the actual growth rate was 5.7%, implying
that it was a success.
Seventh FYP (1985-1990)
This plan was led by the Prime Ministership of Rajiv Gandhi.
The outcome of the Sixth Five-Year Plan provided a robust base for the success of the
seventh five-year plan.
It laid stress on improving Industrial productivity levels through the use of technology.
The target growth rate was 5.0%. However, the actual growth rate grew to reach
6.01%
Eighth FYP (1992-1997)
The target growth rate was 5.6% but the actual growth rate was an incredible
6.8%.
Ninth FYP (1997-2002)
It marked India's fifty years since Independence and Atal Bihari Vajpayee led the
prime ministership.
The focus was to balance the relationship between rapid growth and the quality
of life for the people.
The objectives were developing self-reliance and primary education for all
children in the country.
The target growth rate was estimated at 7.1% but its actual growth rate fell shorter
to 6.8%
Tenth FYP (2002-2007)
The features of this plan were to promote inclusive growth and equitable
development.
It aimed at reducing the poverty by half and creating employment for 80million
people. Further, it aimed to reduce regional inequalities.
It also emphasised reducing the gender gaps in the field of education and wage
rates by 2007.
The target growth rate was 8.1% while the actual growth was 7.6%.
Eleventh FYP (2007-2012)
The Eleventh Plan was significant in its aim to increase enrolment in higher education
and focused on distant education as well as IT institutes.
The focus was also laid on providing clean drinking water for all by 2009.
The target rate was 9% and the actual growth rate was 8%.
Twelfth FYP (2012-2017)
The last Five Year Plan had "Faster, More Inclusive and Sustainable Growth" as its
theme.
The plan aimed at strengthening infrastructure projects, and providing electricity
supply in all villages.
It also aimed at removing the gender and social gap in admissions at school and
improved access to higher education.
Further, it aspired to enhance the green cover by 1 million hectares each year and to
create new opportunities in the non-farming sector.
The target growth rate was 9% but in 2012, National Development Council approved
a growth rate of 8% for this twelfth plan.
NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India)
Background
Planning has been in Indian psyche as our leaders came under influence of the
socialist clime of erstwhile USSR.
Planning commission served as the planning vehicle for close to six decades with a
focus on control and command approach.
India is a diversified country and its states are in various phases of economic
development along with their own strengths and weaknesses.
In this context, a ‘one size fits all’ approach to economic planning is obsolete.
Change in policy making: While designing strategic and long term policies and
programs for the Government of India, NITI Aayog also provides relevant
technical advice to the Centre and States.
Bottom- up approach
Strong focus on research, innovations, technology, collaboration and
development
Digitization: It focuses on technology upgradation and capacity building for
implementation of programmes and initiatives. Example: Digital India
Indices Measuring States’ Performance in Health, Education and Water
Management: ‘Name and shame’ has helped improve states’ business rankings
Various Initiatives by NITI Aayog
First is a 15 year “Vision” that encompasses overall goals and objectives of the
country for next 15 years.
Second is a 7 year “Strategy” which lays the roadmap of development for next
seven years dividing those goals and objectives into two parts.
Third and Final is a “Three Year Action Agenda” which states the tasks and targets
to be accomplished in next three years time frame, further dividing the strategy
into two parts.
Success of NITI AYOG so far
The Atal Innovation Mission, which is established under NITI Aayog, has done
admirable work in improving the innovation ecosystem in India.
Issues associated with NITI AYOG
Inequality has continued to grow in the Indian society and the effect of NITI AYOG
in combating this has been subpar.
Solutions to solve structural issues in the country are still not forthcoming.
Way forward
Equipping the planning body with requisite powers so that it can effect change.
NITI AYOG could be made legally accountable to the legislature for its inability
to meet the targets. This would bring in more accountability.
According to the World Bank: “Civil society ... refers to a wide array of
organizations: community groups, non-governmental organizations [NGOs],
labour unions, indigenous groups, charitable organizations, faith-based
organizations, professional associations, and foundations.”