Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lit Matrixx Re envisioning+the+Annnotated+Bibliography+Assignment+
Lit Matrixx Re envisioning+the+Annnotated+Bibliography+Assignment+
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
ASSIGNMENT
2017 INNOVATIONS in Teaching and Learning Conference
George Mason University
Marilyn K. Sharif
September 22, 2017
Re-envisioning the Annotated Bibliography Assignment
Sub-question #1
spreadsheet) Sub-question #2
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sub-question #3
Research Tool __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Organization
Reflection
Evaluation THEY SAY* I SAY*
Integration
SOURCE MAIN POINT HYPOTHESES METHODS DATA DATA DATA CONCLUSIONS COMMENTS
Author(s) and (Claim) THEORIES Sub-question Sub-question Sub-question (Analysis)
(Publication ASSUMPTIONS #1 #2 #3
Date)
Source #1
Source #2
Source #3
Literature Matrix Assignment
Step 1 Step 3
Step 2 Step 4
Questions Using one row Data & Use data columns
Academic Comments Briefly state your
& Sub- Write main per source, enter Con- for brief notes
Sources & Analysis analysis of this
questions research question author(s) last clusions and page #s of
source…do not
at the top of name(s), and data supporting
write conclusion
matrix… publication year or refuting each
of the author(s).
in first column… sub-question…
and main point, dedicating one Repeat this
and underneath, hypotheses, data column per process for each
write any theories and question or sub- source, one per
subquestions; assumptions in question; row.
next columns;
In the fourth
Prepare separate column, enter In column eight,
list of methods used by summarize
references… author(s) of the author(s)’ main
source. conclusion of this
source.
using one
citation format –
e.g. APA, MLA or
Chicago;
The Literature Matrix Worksheet
Sub-question #1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sub-question #2
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sub-question #3
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SOURCE MAIN POINT HYPOTHESES METHODS DATA DATA DATA CONCLUSIONS COMMENTS
Author(s) and (Claim) THEORIES Sub-question Sub-question Sub-question (Analysis)
(Publication Date) ASSUMPTIONS #1 #2 #3
Source #1
Source #2
Source #3
Source #4
*For templates to scaffold academic writing see: G. Graff & C. Birkenstein (2014). They say, I say: The moves that matter in academic writing (3rd ed.). NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
*With permission.
References