Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

The Journal of Clinical

Pharmacology
http://www.jclinpharm.org

Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetics in Children


Shuchean Chien, Thomas G. Wells, Jeffrey L. Blumer, Gregory L. Kearns, John S. Bradley, Joseph A. Bocchini, Jr, Jaya
Natarajan, Samuel Maldonado and Gary J. Noel
J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2005; 45; 153
DOI: 10.1177/0091270004271944

The online version of this article can be found at:


http://www.jclinpharm.org/cgi/content/abstract/45/2/153

Published by:

http://www.sagepublications.com

On behalf of:
American College of Clinical Pharmacology

Additional services and information for The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology can be found at:

Email Alerts: http://www.jclinpharm.org/cgi/alerts

Subscriptions: http://www.jclinpharm.org/subscriptions

Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav

Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav

Downloaded from http://www.jclinpharm.org by Luciana Oliveira on April 21, 2009


PEDIATRICS

ARTICLE
CHIEN ET AL
10.1177/0091270004271944
LEVOFLOXACIN
PEDIATRICS PHARMACOKINETICS IN CHILDREN

Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetics in Children


Shuchean Chien, MS, Thomas G. Wells, MD, Jeffrey L. Blumer, MD,
Gregory L. Kearns, PharmD, PhD, John S. Bradley, MD, Joseph A. Bocchini, Jr, MD,
Jaya Natarajan, PhD, Samuel Maldonado, MD, MPh, and Gary J. Noel, MD

Levofloxacin is a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone antibiotic than 5 years of age clear levofloxacin nearly twice as fast (in-
with activity against many pathogens that cause bacterial in- travenous dose, 0.32 0.08 L/h/kg; oral dose, 0.28 0.05 L/h/
fections in children, including penicillin-resistant pneumo- kg) as adults and, as a result, have the total systemic expo-
cocci. To provide dosing guidance for children, 3 single-dose, sure (area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve)
multicenter pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in 85 approximately one half that of adults. The levofloxacin area
children in 5 age groups: 6 months to <2 years, 2 to <5 years, 5 under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (dose nor-
to <10 years, 10 to <12 years, and 12 to 16 years. Each child re- malized) in children receiving a single dose of the oral liquid
ceived a single 7-mg/kg dose of levofloxacin (not to exceed formulation is comparable to that in children receiving the
500 mg) intravenously or orally. Plasma and urine samples intravenous formulation. To provide compatible levofloxacin
were collected through 24 hours after dose. Pharmacokinetic exposures associated with clinical effectiveness and safety in
parameters were estimated and compared among the 5 age adults, children 5 years need a daily dose of 10 mg/kg,
groups and to previously collected adult data. Levofloxacin whereas children 6 months to <5 years should receive 10 mg/
absorption (as indicated by Cmax and tmax) and distribution in kg every 12 hours.
children are not age dependent and are comparable to those
in adults. Levofloxacin elimination (reflected by t1/2 and Keywords: Levofloxacin; pediatrics; pharmacokinetics
clearance), however, is age dependent. Children younger Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2005;45:153-160
©2005 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology

L evofloxacin is a synthetic broad-spectrum fluoro-


quinolone antibacterial agent approved for use in
adults for the treatment of a variety of infections.1
protein binding is minimal and is concentration in-
dependent.2,3 Because exposure of juvenile laboratory
animals to some fluoroquinolones is associated with
Levofloxacin undergoes limited metabolism and dem- formation of cartilage lesions, this class of antimicro-
onstrates linear pharmacokinetics in adults; its plasma bials is not widely accepted for routine use in chil-
dren.4,5 Despite this reluctance, fluoroquinolones have
From Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, been prescribed to treat difficult infections in chil-
Raritan, New Jersey (S. Chien, Dr Natarajan, Dr Maldonado, Dr Noel); dren.6-8 Reviews of this experience have yet to define a
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Arkansas Children’s
Hospital PPRU, Little Rock, Arkansas (Dr Wells); Rainbow Babies and Chil-
specific toxicity of these agents that is unique to chil-
dren’s Hospital PPRU, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Blumer); University of Mis- dren or to corroborate the animal data regarding ad-
souri–Kansas City and the Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics PPRU, verse cartilage effects. Given this experience and the
Kansas City, Missouri (Dr Kearns); Children’s Hospital and Health Center potential value of levofloxacin as an alternative agent
and the UCSD/Children’s Hospital PPRU, San Diego, California (Dr for children with infections caused by pathogens resis-
Bradley); Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center–Shreveport tant to broad-spectrum β-lactams and macrolides, there
and the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center–Shreveport
is reason to examine levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in
PPRU, Shreveport, Louisiana (Dr Bocchini); and University of Medicine and
Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey (Dr Noel). This work was pediatric patients. This is especially true given the
funded by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Develop- well-known alterations in drug disposition due to the
ment, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey. Dr Kearns and Shuchean Chien are mem- developmental differences in body composition (eg,
bers of the ACCP. Submitted for publication March 19, 2004; revised ver- apparent volume of distribution) and the plasma clear-
sion accepted October 7, 2004. Address for reprints: Shuchean Chien, ance of many drugs.9,10
MS, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, To examine the potential age dependence in the
920 Route 202 South, PO Box 300, Raritan, NJ 08869-0602.
DOI: 10.1177/0091270004271944
pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin, 3 single-dose phar-

J Clin Pharmacol 2005;45:153-160 153


CHIEN ET AL

macokinetic studies were conducted in children from ministered with an age-appropriate volume of water
the ages of 6 months to 16 years following either an in- (90-120 mL at 4 °C) or clear liquids to ensure complete
travenous or oral dose as a liquid formulation. Pharma- delivery of the dose to the stomach. Subjects did not
cokinetic data were compared among 5 age groups (6 have solid foods for at least 2 hours before and 2 hours
months to <2 years, 2 to <5 years, 5 to <10 years, 10 to after dosing. Clear liquids, such as apple juice, were
<12 years, and 12 to 16 years) and to previous data from permitted until 1 hour before and 1 hour after dose. All
adults receiving a single 500-mg dose of levofloxacin study medication (both IV and PO formulations) was
(~7 mg/kg for adults with average body weight of 70 kg) derived from a single lot of levofloxacin so as to mini-
that had demonstrated clinical effectiveness and mize variability in drug potency between patients in a
safety. given study. In all 3 pediatric investigations, the total
dose of levofloxacin did not exceed 500 mg.
MATERIALS AND METHODS In each study, blood samples (2.0 mL each) were ob-
tained at various time points during a 24-hour postdose
Study Designs period through an indwelling venous cannula placed
in an extremity. For the intravenous study, blood sam-
Three studies were conducted to characterize the phar- ples were collected from an extremity contralateral to
macokinetics of levofloxacin in children. Two open- the one used for levofloxacin infusion. When possible,
label studies administered a single intravenous (IV) 36- and 48-hour postdose blood samples were also col-
dose, and a third open-label study administered a sin- lected. Urine samples were collected by spontaneous
gle oral (PO) dose of a liquid formulation of levoflox- voiding from subjects who were toilet trained and who
acin. Study 1 (IV dosing) was conducted with 20 hospi- could reliably provide quantitative collections. Blood
talized children, aged 6 months to 12 years. Study 2 (IV samples were collected into glass tubes containing so-
dosing) involved 24 hospitalized children aged 8 to 16 dium heparin, mixed by inversion, and were centri-
years. Study 3 (PO dosing) involved 41 children, aged 6 fuged at 2500 rpm for 10 minutes at room temperature.
months to 16 years. In all 3 studies, children either had Plasma was removed by manual aspiration, placed into
documented or presumed bacterial infections and a screw-capped polypropylene vial, and frozen at ≤–20
were receiving concomitant antimicrobial therapy pre- °C until assay. Urine samples were collected, the vol-
scribed independently of the study protocol. Children ume and pH determined, and a 20-mL aliquot trans-
were housed in an appropriate hospital unit for at least ferred to a polypropylene bottle and frozen at ≤–20 °C
12 hours following administration of the study medica- until assay. Both plasma and urine samples were
tion. Subject eligibility was restricted to those with no analyzed within 6 months from collection.
evidence of clinically significant abnormal hematol- The total concentration of levofloxacin in plasma or
ogy, serum chemistry (including assessment of albu- in urine was determined by a validated high-perfor-
min concentration, hepatic and renal function), or uri- mance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method.11 The
nalysis laboratory values. Subjects were excluded if method had a range of linearity from 0.08 to 5.12 µg/
they were taking other quinolones or any other con- mL, and the inter- and intra-assay precision values (ex-
comitant medication that might interfere with the pressed as percent coefficient of variation) were consis-
interpretation of the study results (eg, loop diuret- tently below 10% for all concentrations in the range of
ics, probenecid, cimetidine, or drugs or natural prod- linearity. The limit of quantification for the assay was
ucts known to induce or inhibit hepatic microsomal determined to be 82 ng/mL. The accuracy of the
enzymes). method was reflected by measured concentrations of
Enrollment in each of these 3 studies was stratified the quality control samples that were consistently
by age. Children in study 1 (n = 20; 6 months to <2 within ±10% of the target concentrations. Stability of
years, 2 to <5 years, 5 to <12 years) and study 2 (n = 24; 8 samples (defined as <10% loss of initial concentration)
to <10 years, 10 to <12 years, and 12 to 16 years) re- was previously verified through 2 years when main-
ceived a single 7-mg/kg dose of levofloxacin (final con- tained at ≤–20 °C. The assay was selective, and there
centration 5 mg/mL; diluted in 5% dextrose and water was no assay interference by the presence of concom-
D5W) infused intravenously at a constant rate over 1 itant medications.
hour using a syringe pump with microbore tubing. Tolerability was evaluated by assessment of adverse
Children in study 3 (n = 41; 6 months to <2 years, 2 to events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and physi-
<5 years, 5 to <10 years, 10 to <12 years, and 12 to 16 cal examinations. Complete physical examinations
years) received a single 7-mg/kg oral dose of levo- were performed within 48 hours before and after dos-
floxacin suspension. Levofloxacin PO doses were ad- ing. Vital signs were obtained immediately before

154 • J Clin Pharmacol 2005;45:153-160


LEVOFLOXACIN PHARMACOKINETICS IN CHILDREN

study drug administration and at the end of the study. Ae is the cumulative amount of drug excreted within
Clinical laboratory tests included hemoglobin, the sampling interval, and AUC is the AUC of the drug
hematocrit, red blood cell, white blood cell, and platelet in plasma extrapolated to the end of the urine col-
counts; serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, serum lection period. For comparison, pharmacokinetic data
glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, from adult male volunteers (aged 18-53 years) were in-
total protein, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, serum cluded that were derived from previously published
albumin, serum creatinine, sodium, potassium, and methods.13
chloride levels; and gross and microscopic urinalyses.
Subjects were recruited at 5 study sites: University Statistical Analysis
of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Arkansas
Children’s Hospital PPRU, Little Rock, Arkansas; Rain- Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in children was com-
bow Babies and Children’s Hospital PPRU, Cleveland, pared among the 5 age groups (6 months to <2 years, 2
Ohio; University of Missouri–Kansas City and the Chil- to <5 years, 5 to <10 years, 10 to <12 years, and 12 to 16
dren’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics PPRU, Kansas City, years) and to data collected from separate studies in
Missouri; Children’s Hospital and Health Center and which healthy fasting adults received a single 500-mg
the UCSD/Children’s Hospital PPRU, San Diego, Cali- levofloxacin dose (approximately equivalent to 7 mg/
fornia; and Louisiana State University Health Sciences kg) in either the IV (20-40 years, n = 23; 1-hour IV infu-
Center–Shreveport and the Louisiana State University sion) or PO liquid formulation (19-55 years, n = 36).
Health Sciences Center–Shreveport PPRU, Shreveport, The pharmacokinetic parameters of interest for the sta-
Louisiana. Laboratory analysis of plasma and urine tistical analysis were Cmax, CL, and Vd. Because AUC is
samples was conducted at Johnson & Johnson Pharma- correlated with CL to a constant value (ie, CL = dose/
ceutical Research and Development, LLC, Raritan, AUC), a separate statistical analysis for AUC was not
New Jersey. Independent institutional review boards at performed. The analysis of variance models was fit to
each study site reviewed the study protocol. Informed the data with one of the pharmacokinetic parameters as
consent was obtained from the parent or guardian and the dependent variable and the age group as the cate-
assent from subjects age ≥7 years before the initiation of gorical predictor. The age group effect was tested at the
any study-related procedures. 5% level of significance. If the age group effect was
found to be significant, then the pairwise comparisons
Pharmacokinetic Analysis for age groups were tested at a level of significance of α
= 0.003 for each pairwise test (overall 5% level of sig-
Levofloxacin plasma concentration-time data were nificance). Statistics were performed using SAS
analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods.12 Version 6.12 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Pharmacokinetic parameters characterizing the ab-
sorption (Cmax, tmax), distribution (Vd), elimination (t1/2 RESULTS
and clearance [CL]), and total systemic exposure (area
under the plasma drug concentration-time curve Patient Population
[AUC]) of levofloxacin in children were estimated. The
apparent Cmax and tmax values were estimated by visual Eighty-five children (20, 24, and 41 in studies 1, 2, and
inspection of the plasma drug concentration-time data 3, respectively) ranging from 6 months to 16 years of
for each subject. The AUC was obtained by the linear age were enrolled and completed the study, and thus
trapezoidal rule up to the final measurable concentra- they were evaluated for tolerability. Eighty subjects
tion (Cplast) and was extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), had sufficient concentration-time data to accurately
calculated as AUC0-last + Cplast/kel, where kel is the termi- determine pharmacokinetic parameters and conse-
nal elimination rate constant (ie, the slope of the quently were included in the pharmacokinetic evalua-
plasma concentration-time profile at the terminal log- tion. The 5 subjects not included in the pharma-
linear phase, as determined by least squares linear re- cokinetic evaluation included 1 subject from study 1
gression), and AUC0-last is the AUC from 0 hours to the (withdrew from the study immediately after dose and
time corresponding to Cplast. Apparent total body clear- before any pharmacokinetic sample was collected), 3
ance (CL for IV and CL/F for PO) was determined as from study 2 (pharmacokinetic sample labels fell off
dose/AUC0-∞. The terminal plasma elimination half-life during shipment), and 1 from study 3 (vomited imme-
(t1/2) was calculated as 0.693/kel and the apparent vol- diately after receiving study drug and was withdrawn
ume of distribution (Vd) as CL/kel. The renal clearance from the study). Demographics and baseline character-
(CLR) was calculated by the equation Ae/AUC, where istics of the 80 pharmacokinetically evaluable children

PEDIATRICS 155
CHIEN ET AL

Table I Demographic and Baseline Characteristics of


the 80 Pharmacokinetically Evaluable Subjects
Age Group, y Gender Weight, kg CLCR, mL/min

IV
0.5 to <2 1F, 5M
Mean 9.4 189.7 ± 89.0
Range 6.4-11.6
2 to <5 5F, 2M
Mean 13.7 193.8 ± 164.7
Range 12.4-16.5
5 to <10 6F, 4M
Mean 24.9 164.5 ± 59.9
Range 10.2-37.3
10 to <12 6F, 1M Figure 1. Mean values of levofloxacin plasma concentration versus
time profiles in children and adults receiving a single intravenous
Mean 45.1 137.4 ± 26.6 (IV) dose of levofloxacin (children, 7 mg/kg; adults, 500 mg). Each
Range 35.9-58.2 symbol indicates the mean plasma concentration for subjects in the
12 to 16 5F, 5M corresponding age group.
Mean 57.5 149.5 ± 34.7
Range 39.9-84.1
PO
0.5 to <2 3F, 5M
Mean 11.0 145.5 ± 29.1
Range 8.8-13.5
2 to <5 6F, 2M
Mean 15.6 172.0 ± 54.3
Range 12.7-21.8
5 to <10 3F, 5M
Mean 26.1 156.3 ± 38.5
Range 17.7-39.5
10 to <12 5F, 3M
Mean 42.5 144.5 ± 24.1
Range 26.4-68.2
12 to <16 6F, 2M
Mean 60.7 134.9 ± 26.0
Range 47.9-81.6
IV, intravenous dose; PO, oral dose. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) presented Figure 2. Mean values of levofloxacin plasma concentration versus
as mean ± SD. CLCR was calculated using the Schwartz formula.17 time profiles in children and adults receiving a single oral (PO) dose
of levofloxacin (children, 7 mg/kg; adults, 500 mg). Each symbol indi-
cates data for subjects in the corresponding age group.

are provided in Table I. In general, levofloxacin was


well tolerated, and no severe adverse events were
reported by any of the participants during the study superimposable, as were the profiles between children
period. 10 to 12 years old and children 12 to 16 years old. When
comparing levofloxacin plasma concentration profiles
Pharmacokinetics resulting from the PO and IV administrations, each of
the age groups showed similar profiles after the initial
The mean plasma levofloxacin concentration-time time points (ie, from 0 to 2 hours).
profiles for each age group receiving either the IV or PO The levofloxacin pharmacokinetic parameters after
dose are illustrated in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Re- IV and PO dosing for each of the 5 pediatric age groups
gardless of the route of drug administration, the pro- and for adults are shown in Table II. The statistical test
files for infants (6 months to 2 years old) and younger results from intergroup comparison using ANOVA are
children (2 to 5 years old) were found to be nearly presented in Tables III and IV. No age-dependent differ-

156 • J Clin Pharmacol 2005;45:153-160


LEVOFLOXACIN PHARMACOKINETICS IN CHILDREN

Table II Summary of Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetic Estimates in Children Receiving a Single Dose (7 mg/kg)

Age Group, y n Cmax, µg/mL AUC0-∞, µg•h/mL t1/2, h tmax, h VDss/F, L/kg CL/F, L/h/kg

Children; single 7-mg/kg dose (to max 500 mg)

0.5 to 2
IV 6 5.19 ± 1.26 21.5 ± 6.1 4.1 ± 1.3 1 1.56 ± 0.30 0.35 ± 0.13
PO 8 4.21 ± 1.49 25.8 ± 9.2 5.0 ± 1.3 1.4 ± 0.4 2.32 ± 1.41 0.31 ± 0.13
2 to 5
IV 7 6.02 ± 1.07 22.7 ± 4.7 4.0 ± 0.8 1 1.50 ± 0.21 0.32 ± 0.08
PO 8 4.56 ± 0.83 25.9 ± 4.8 4.6 ± 1.3 1.6 ± 0.5 1.81 ± 0.62 0.28 ± 0.05
5 to 10
IV 10 7.30 ± 3.85 29.2 ± 6.4 4.8 ± 0.8 1 1.57 ± 0.44 0.25 ± 0.05
PO 8 4.64 ± 0.39 29.0 ± 10.0 5.3 ± 1.6 1.3 ± 0.4 1.88 ± 0.44 0.26 ± 0.06
10 to 12
IV 7 6.12 ± 1.19 39.8 ± 11.3 5.4 ± 0.8 1 1.44 ± 0.35 0.19 ± 0.05
PO 8 3.99 ± 0.87 37.3 ± 9.8 5.5 ± 0.7 1.9 ± 0.9 1.57 ± 0.43 0.20 ± 0.06
12 to 16
IV 10 6.34 ± 1.58 40.5 ± 7.6 6.0 ± 2.1 1 1.56 ± 0.53 0.18 ± 0.03
PO 8 4.76 ± 0.86 41.1 ± 6.8 5.8 ± 1.4 1.6 ± 1.0 1.40 ± 0.28 0.17 ± 0.04

Adults; single 500-mg dosea

IV 23 6.18 ± 1.04 48.3 ± 5.40 6.0 ± 1.0 1 1.27 ± 0.12 0.15 ± 0.02
PO 36 5.41 ± 1.68 49.3 ± 12.5 6.9 ± 1.5 1.1 ± 0.9 1.44 ± 0.40 0.14 ± 0.03
All data presented as mean ± SD. IV, intravenous dose; PO, oral dose; Cmax, maximum concentration; AUC0-∞, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to
infinity; t1/2, half-life; tmax, time to achieve Cmax; VDss/F, volume of distribution at steady state/bioavailability; CL/F, clearance/bioavailability.
a. Data on file, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey.

ence was observed for Cmax between the 5 age groups Table III Testing for Age Group Effect
and adults (P = .194). When Vd was normalized by
body weight, the pairwise comparisons were found not Parameter MSE F df P Value
to be significantly different, except the comparison be-
CL, L/h•kg 0.003 37.30 (5, 133) <.001a
tween children <2 years of age and adults (P = .0002). In
Vd, L/kg 0.268 3.57 (5, 133) .005a
contrast, levofloxacin apparent total body clearance Cmax, µg/mL 3.119 1.50 (5, 133) .194
(CL or CL/F, normalized by body weight) was shown to
CL, clearance; Vd, distribution; Cmax, maximum concentration; MSE, mean
vary as a consequence of age until approximately 10 square error.
years of age (Tables II to IV). a. Denotes significant at α = 0.05 level of significance.

Safety
were no clinically significant changes in laboratory
No subjects experienced a drug-related adverse event values from the predose to postdose evaluations.
that was considered serious or life threatening, and no
tendon- or joint-related adverse events were observed. DISCUSSION
All of the reported treatment-emergent adverse events
were considered by the investigator to be mild or mod- The results of these single-dose studies indicate that,
erate in severity. There was 1 serious adverse event of with the exception of CL or CL/F, the pharmacokinetics
wound dehiscence, but this was judged by the investi- of levofloxacin did not appear to vary as a consequence
gator to not be drug related. Proteinuria, indicated by of age between 6 months and 16 years (Table II). The ap-
positive dipstick, occurred in 2 patients but was re- parent total body clearance of levofloxacin was in-
solved spontaneously upon repeat evaluation. There versely associated with age (Table II, Figure 3). Specifi-

PEDIATRICS 157
CHIEN ET AL

Table IV Testing for Significance of Difference of Least Squares Means for Age Group
Parameter Age Group 2 to <5 Years 5 to <10 Years 10 to <12 Years 12 to 16 Years Adult

CL, L/h•kg <2 NS S S S S


2 to <5 — NS S S S
5 to <10 — NS S S
10 to <12 — NS NS
12 to 16 — NS
Vd, L/kg <2 NS NS NS NS S
2 to <5 — NS NS NS NS
5 to <10 — NS NS NS
10 to <12 — NS NS
12 to 16 — NS
Vd, distribution; CL, clearance; NS, not significant at an overall α = 0.05 level of significance; S, significant at an overall α = 0.05 level of significance.

cally, clearance consistently decreased with age until


10 years of age (IV, 0.35 ± 0.13 to 0.19 ± 0.05 L/h•kg; PO,
0.31 ± 0.13 to 0.20 ± 0.06 L/h•kg; Table II), where it sta-
bilized to values slightly higher than those previously
observed in adults (IV, 0.15 ± 0.02 L/h•kg; PO, 0.14 ±
0.03 L/h•kg; Table II). When an inverse first-order non-
linear regression curve fit was applied to the apparent
total body clearance versus age profiles, it was ob-
served that the most significant change occurred dur-
ing the first 1 to 2 years of age; the decrease slowed
down afterward and stabilized at 10 years of age (Fig-
ure 3). This phenomenon may be explained by the fact
that levofloxacin is minimally metabolized and pri-
marily excreted renally as an unchanged drug. In view
of the fact that the developmental profile for the acqui-
sition of the glomerular filtration rate reflects the at-
tainment of maturity over the first 1 to 2 years of age,14 Figure 3. Apparent total body clearance versus age profiles in chil-
the pattern for age dependence in levofloxacin appar- dren and adults receiving a single dose of levofloxacin (children, 7
ent clearance found in the present study (Figure 3) was mg/kg; adults, 500 mg). Values are shown for subjects after an intra-
venous (filled circles) or oral dose (open circles).
expected. Children younger than 5 years of age cleared
levofloxacin nearly twice as fast (IV, 0.32 ± 0.08 L/h•kg;
PO, 0.28 ± 0.05 L/h•kg; Table II) as adults and, as a
result, had a total systemic exposure (AUC) Levofloxacin exhibits concentration-dependent
approximately one half that of adults (Table II). bactericidal activity, and clinical outcomes are related
The results from the current investigation also dem- to the ratios of AUC/MIC or Cmax/MIC. To identify a dosing
onstrate that the apparent bioavailability of regimen that provides comparable levofloxacin expo-
levofloxacin in children was virtually 100% (Table II; sures between adults and children, a pharmacokinetic/
mean AUC ratios between the PO and IV administra- pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling approach was
tions were 120%, 114%, 99%, 94%, and 101% for 6 applied. An optimal dosing regimen can be based on
months to <2 years, 2 to <5 years, 5 to <10 years, 10 to the following criteria: (1) achieving a steady-state Cmax
<12 years, and 12 to 16 years, respectively) and was and AUC that do not exceed the Cmax or AUC that have
compatible with the absolute bioavailability (99%- been shown to be well tolerated by adults,15 (2) achiev-
103%) observed from the adults receiving the same ing a steady-state Cmax/MIC that has been shown to be
oral liquid formulation in a crossover bioavailability effective in treating adults,16 and (3) approximating
study (Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & 70% to 130% the steady-state AUC/MIC that has been
Development, LLC; data on file). shown to be associated with effectiveness in adults.

158 • J Clin Pharmacol 2005;45:153-160


LEVOFLOXACIN PHARMACOKINETICS IN CHILDREN

Table V Pharmacokinetic Estimates of the 2-Compartment Pharmacokinetic Model Used in


Dosing Regimen Simulation
6 Months to <5 Years 5 to <10 Years 10 to 16 Years

Volume, L/kg 0.69 0.68 0.93


K10, h–1 0.50 0.38 0.20
K12, h–1 1.52 1.31 0.19
K21, h–1 1.75 1.50 0.41
K10, K12, and K21 are first-order intercompartmental transfer rate constants.

Table VI Predicted Levofloxacin Steady-State Drug Exposures in Children Under the


Recommended Dosing Regimens
Adults
6 Months to <5 Years, 5 to <10 Years, 10 to 16 Years,
a b
10 mg/kg bid 10 mg/kg qd 10 mg/kg qd 500 mg qd 750 mg qd

AUC0-24h, µg•h/mL 58.4 38.4 54.8 54.6 ± 11.1c 91.0 ± 18.0c


Cmax, µg/mL 8.37 8.80 9.35 6.40 ± 0.80c 8.60 ± 1.86c
a. Recommended adult dose for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.
b. Recommended adult dose for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.
c. Observed data in healthy adults, as reported on the Levaquin package insert.

Data collected from the 3 studies indicate that a 2-com- children, especially for those younger than 5 years of
partment pharmacokinetic model with constant input age.
and first-order output (parameters listed in Table V),
which passed the goodness-of-fit and the Akaike and REFERENCES
Schwartz model selection criteria, is most appropriate
for dosing regimen simulation for children. On the ba- 1. Hurst M, Lamb HM, Scott LJ, Figgitt DP. Levofloxacin: an updated
sis of this PK/PD model, children of older age (≥5 years) review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections. Drugs. 2002;
would require a 10-mg/kg body weight dose once daily, 62:2127-2167.
whereas children of younger age (6 months to <5 years) 2. Fish DN, Chow AT. The clinical pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin.
should receive a 10-mg/kg dose every 12 hours. Pre- Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;32:101-119.
dicted steady-state levofloxacin exposures in children 3. Nightingale CH, Grant EM, Quintiliani R. Pharmacodynamics and
under these dosing regimens are presented in Table VI. pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin. Chemotherapy. 2000;46(suppl
1):6-14.
Safety, efficacy, and population pharmacokinetics of
4. Burkhardt JE, Hill MA, Turek JJ, Carlton WW. Ultrastructural
these dosing regimens are currently being evaluated in
changes in articular cartilages of immature beagle dogs dosed with
children 6 months to 16 years of age. Population difloxacin, a fluoroquinolone. Vet Pathol. 1992;29:230-238.
pharmacokinetic analysis will provide important con- 5. Burkhardt JE, Walterspiel JN, Schaad UB. Quinolone arthropathy
firmation, particularly because the sample size for each in animals versus children. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:1196-1204.
group in the current study was small. It is also impor- 6. Alghasham AA, Nahata MC. Clinical use of fluoroquinolones in
tant to recognize that these recommendations should children. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:347-359.
not be extrapolated to infants younger than 6 months of 7. Hampel B, Hullmann R, Schmidt H. Ciprofloxacin in pediatrics:
age, a population that has not yet been studied. worldwide clinical experience based on compassionate use—safety
The study results demonstrate that an age-dependent report. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:127-129.
difference in total body clearance of levofloxacin oc- 8. Schaad UB, Salam MA, Aujard Y, et al. Use of fluoroquinolones in
pediatrics: consensus report of an International Society of Chemo-
curs at a magnitude sufficient to warrant age-specific
therapy Commission. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:1-9.
dosing regimens. Extrapolation of dosing in children
9. Routledge PA. Pharmacokinetics in children. J Antimicrob
based on the defined pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin Chemother. 1994;34(suppl A):19-24.
in adults may result in insufficient drug exposure in

PEDIATRICS 159
CHIEN ET AL

10. San Joaquin VH, Stull TL. Antibacterial agents in pediatrics. In- action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003;
fect Dis Clin North Am. 2000;14:341-355. 349:1157-1167.
11. Wong FA, Juzwin SJ, Flor SC. Rapid stereospecific high-perfor- 15. Levaquin tablets/injection (levofloxacin tablets/injection) pre-
mance liquid chromatographic determination of levofloxacin in hu- scribing information. Raritan, NJ: Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical;
man plasma and urine. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1997;15:765-771. 2003.
12. Gibaldi M, Perrier D, eds. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed. New York: 16. Preston SL, Drusano GL, Berman AL, et al. Pharmacodynamics of
Marcel Dekker; 1982. levofloxacin: a new paradigm for early clinical trials. JAMA. 1998;
13. Chien S-C, Rogge MC, Gisclon LG, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile 279:125-129.
of levofloxacin following once-daily 500-milligram oral or intrave- 17. Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CMJ, Spitzer A. A simple
nous doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2256-2260. estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body
14. Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics. 1976;58:259-263.
JS, Kauffman RE. Developmental pharmacology—drug disposition,

160 • J Clin Pharmacol 2005;45:153-160

You might also like