Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetics in Children
Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetics in Children
Pharmacology
http://www.jclinpharm.org
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
American College of Clinical Pharmacology
Additional services and information for The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://www.jclinpharm.org/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
ARTICLE
CHIEN ET AL
10.1177/0091270004271944
LEVOFLOXACIN
PEDIATRICS PHARMACOKINETICS IN CHILDREN
Levofloxacin is a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone antibiotic than 5 years of age clear levofloxacin nearly twice as fast (in-
with activity against many pathogens that cause bacterial in- travenous dose, 0.32 0.08 L/h/kg; oral dose, 0.28 0.05 L/h/
fections in children, including penicillin-resistant pneumo- kg) as adults and, as a result, have the total systemic expo-
cocci. To provide dosing guidance for children, 3 single-dose, sure (area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve)
multicenter pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in 85 approximately one half that of adults. The levofloxacin area
children in 5 age groups: 6 months to <2 years, 2 to <5 years, 5 under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (dose nor-
to <10 years, 10 to <12 years, and 12 to 16 years. Each child re- malized) in children receiving a single dose of the oral liquid
ceived a single 7-mg/kg dose of levofloxacin (not to exceed formulation is comparable to that in children receiving the
500 mg) intravenously or orally. Plasma and urine samples intravenous formulation. To provide compatible levofloxacin
were collected through 24 hours after dose. Pharmacokinetic exposures associated with clinical effectiveness and safety in
parameters were estimated and compared among the 5 age adults, children 5 years need a daily dose of 10 mg/kg,
groups and to previously collected adult data. Levofloxacin whereas children 6 months to <5 years should receive 10 mg/
absorption (as indicated by Cmax and tmax) and distribution in kg every 12 hours.
children are not age dependent and are comparable to those
in adults. Levofloxacin elimination (reflected by t1/2 and Keywords: Levofloxacin; pediatrics; pharmacokinetics
clearance), however, is age dependent. Children younger Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2005;45:153-160
©2005 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology
macokinetic studies were conducted in children from ministered with an age-appropriate volume of water
the ages of 6 months to 16 years following either an in- (90-120 mL at 4 °C) or clear liquids to ensure complete
travenous or oral dose as a liquid formulation. Pharma- delivery of the dose to the stomach. Subjects did not
cokinetic data were compared among 5 age groups (6 have solid foods for at least 2 hours before and 2 hours
months to <2 years, 2 to <5 years, 5 to <10 years, 10 to after dosing. Clear liquids, such as apple juice, were
<12 years, and 12 to 16 years) and to previous data from permitted until 1 hour before and 1 hour after dose. All
adults receiving a single 500-mg dose of levofloxacin study medication (both IV and PO formulations) was
(~7 mg/kg for adults with average body weight of 70 kg) derived from a single lot of levofloxacin so as to mini-
that had demonstrated clinical effectiveness and mize variability in drug potency between patients in a
safety. given study. In all 3 pediatric investigations, the total
dose of levofloxacin did not exceed 500 mg.
MATERIALS AND METHODS In each study, blood samples (2.0 mL each) were ob-
tained at various time points during a 24-hour postdose
Study Designs period through an indwelling venous cannula placed
in an extremity. For the intravenous study, blood sam-
Three studies were conducted to characterize the phar- ples were collected from an extremity contralateral to
macokinetics of levofloxacin in children. Two open- the one used for levofloxacin infusion. When possible,
label studies administered a single intravenous (IV) 36- and 48-hour postdose blood samples were also col-
dose, and a third open-label study administered a sin- lected. Urine samples were collected by spontaneous
gle oral (PO) dose of a liquid formulation of levoflox- voiding from subjects who were toilet trained and who
acin. Study 1 (IV dosing) was conducted with 20 hospi- could reliably provide quantitative collections. Blood
talized children, aged 6 months to 12 years. Study 2 (IV samples were collected into glass tubes containing so-
dosing) involved 24 hospitalized children aged 8 to 16 dium heparin, mixed by inversion, and were centri-
years. Study 3 (PO dosing) involved 41 children, aged 6 fuged at 2500 rpm for 10 minutes at room temperature.
months to 16 years. In all 3 studies, children either had Plasma was removed by manual aspiration, placed into
documented or presumed bacterial infections and a screw-capped polypropylene vial, and frozen at ≤–20
were receiving concomitant antimicrobial therapy pre- °C until assay. Urine samples were collected, the vol-
scribed independently of the study protocol. Children ume and pH determined, and a 20-mL aliquot trans-
were housed in an appropriate hospital unit for at least ferred to a polypropylene bottle and frozen at ≤–20 °C
12 hours following administration of the study medica- until assay. Both plasma and urine samples were
tion. Subject eligibility was restricted to those with no analyzed within 6 months from collection.
evidence of clinically significant abnormal hematol- The total concentration of levofloxacin in plasma or
ogy, serum chemistry (including assessment of albu- in urine was determined by a validated high-perfor-
min concentration, hepatic and renal function), or uri- mance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method.11 The
nalysis laboratory values. Subjects were excluded if method had a range of linearity from 0.08 to 5.12 µg/
they were taking other quinolones or any other con- mL, and the inter- and intra-assay precision values (ex-
comitant medication that might interfere with the pressed as percent coefficient of variation) were consis-
interpretation of the study results (eg, loop diuret- tently below 10% for all concentrations in the range of
ics, probenecid, cimetidine, or drugs or natural prod- linearity. The limit of quantification for the assay was
ucts known to induce or inhibit hepatic microsomal determined to be 82 ng/mL. The accuracy of the
enzymes). method was reflected by measured concentrations of
Enrollment in each of these 3 studies was stratified the quality control samples that were consistently
by age. Children in study 1 (n = 20; 6 months to <2 within ±10% of the target concentrations. Stability of
years, 2 to <5 years, 5 to <12 years) and study 2 (n = 24; 8 samples (defined as <10% loss of initial concentration)
to <10 years, 10 to <12 years, and 12 to 16 years) re- was previously verified through 2 years when main-
ceived a single 7-mg/kg dose of levofloxacin (final con- tained at ≤–20 °C. The assay was selective, and there
centration 5 mg/mL; diluted in 5% dextrose and water was no assay interference by the presence of concom-
D5W) infused intravenously at a constant rate over 1 itant medications.
hour using a syringe pump with microbore tubing. Tolerability was evaluated by assessment of adverse
Children in study 3 (n = 41; 6 months to <2 years, 2 to events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and physi-
<5 years, 5 to <10 years, 10 to <12 years, and 12 to 16 cal examinations. Complete physical examinations
years) received a single 7-mg/kg oral dose of levo- were performed within 48 hours before and after dos-
floxacin suspension. Levofloxacin PO doses were ad- ing. Vital signs were obtained immediately before
study drug administration and at the end of the study. Ae is the cumulative amount of drug excreted within
Clinical laboratory tests included hemoglobin, the sampling interval, and AUC is the AUC of the drug
hematocrit, red blood cell, white blood cell, and platelet in plasma extrapolated to the end of the urine col-
counts; serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, serum lection period. For comparison, pharmacokinetic data
glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, from adult male volunteers (aged 18-53 years) were in-
total protein, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, serum cluded that were derived from previously published
albumin, serum creatinine, sodium, potassium, and methods.13
chloride levels; and gross and microscopic urinalyses.
Subjects were recruited at 5 study sites: University Statistical Analysis
of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Arkansas
Children’s Hospital PPRU, Little Rock, Arkansas; Rain- Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in children was com-
bow Babies and Children’s Hospital PPRU, Cleveland, pared among the 5 age groups (6 months to <2 years, 2
Ohio; University of Missouri–Kansas City and the Chil- to <5 years, 5 to <10 years, 10 to <12 years, and 12 to 16
dren’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics PPRU, Kansas City, years) and to data collected from separate studies in
Missouri; Children’s Hospital and Health Center and which healthy fasting adults received a single 500-mg
the UCSD/Children’s Hospital PPRU, San Diego, Cali- levofloxacin dose (approximately equivalent to 7 mg/
fornia; and Louisiana State University Health Sciences kg) in either the IV (20-40 years, n = 23; 1-hour IV infu-
Center–Shreveport and the Louisiana State University sion) or PO liquid formulation (19-55 years, n = 36).
Health Sciences Center–Shreveport PPRU, Shreveport, The pharmacokinetic parameters of interest for the sta-
Louisiana. Laboratory analysis of plasma and urine tistical analysis were Cmax, CL, and Vd. Because AUC is
samples was conducted at Johnson & Johnson Pharma- correlated with CL to a constant value (ie, CL = dose/
ceutical Research and Development, LLC, Raritan, AUC), a separate statistical analysis for AUC was not
New Jersey. Independent institutional review boards at performed. The analysis of variance models was fit to
each study site reviewed the study protocol. Informed the data with one of the pharmacokinetic parameters as
consent was obtained from the parent or guardian and the dependent variable and the age group as the cate-
assent from subjects age ≥7 years before the initiation of gorical predictor. The age group effect was tested at the
any study-related procedures. 5% level of significance. If the age group effect was
found to be significant, then the pairwise comparisons
Pharmacokinetic Analysis for age groups were tested at a level of significance of α
= 0.003 for each pairwise test (overall 5% level of sig-
Levofloxacin plasma concentration-time data were nificance). Statistics were performed using SAS
analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods.12 Version 6.12 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Pharmacokinetic parameters characterizing the ab-
sorption (Cmax, tmax), distribution (Vd), elimination (t1/2 RESULTS
and clearance [CL]), and total systemic exposure (area
under the plasma drug concentration-time curve Patient Population
[AUC]) of levofloxacin in children were estimated. The
apparent Cmax and tmax values were estimated by visual Eighty-five children (20, 24, and 41 in studies 1, 2, and
inspection of the plasma drug concentration-time data 3, respectively) ranging from 6 months to 16 years of
for each subject. The AUC was obtained by the linear age were enrolled and completed the study, and thus
trapezoidal rule up to the final measurable concentra- they were evaluated for tolerability. Eighty subjects
tion (Cplast) and was extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), had sufficient concentration-time data to accurately
calculated as AUC0-last + Cplast/kel, where kel is the termi- determine pharmacokinetic parameters and conse-
nal elimination rate constant (ie, the slope of the quently were included in the pharmacokinetic evalua-
plasma concentration-time profile at the terminal log- tion. The 5 subjects not included in the pharma-
linear phase, as determined by least squares linear re- cokinetic evaluation included 1 subject from study 1
gression), and AUC0-last is the AUC from 0 hours to the (withdrew from the study immediately after dose and
time corresponding to Cplast. Apparent total body clear- before any pharmacokinetic sample was collected), 3
ance (CL for IV and CL/F for PO) was determined as from study 2 (pharmacokinetic sample labels fell off
dose/AUC0-∞. The terminal plasma elimination half-life during shipment), and 1 from study 3 (vomited imme-
(t1/2) was calculated as 0.693/kel and the apparent vol- diately after receiving study drug and was withdrawn
ume of distribution (Vd) as CL/kel. The renal clearance from the study). Demographics and baseline character-
(CLR) was calculated by the equation Ae/AUC, where istics of the 80 pharmacokinetically evaluable children
PEDIATRICS 155
CHIEN ET AL
IV
0.5 to <2 1F, 5M
Mean 9.4 189.7 ± 89.0
Range 6.4-11.6
2 to <5 5F, 2M
Mean 13.7 193.8 ± 164.7
Range 12.4-16.5
5 to <10 6F, 4M
Mean 24.9 164.5 ± 59.9
Range 10.2-37.3
10 to <12 6F, 1M Figure 1. Mean values of levofloxacin plasma concentration versus
time profiles in children and adults receiving a single intravenous
Mean 45.1 137.4 ± 26.6 (IV) dose of levofloxacin (children, 7 mg/kg; adults, 500 mg). Each
Range 35.9-58.2 symbol indicates the mean plasma concentration for subjects in the
12 to 16 5F, 5M corresponding age group.
Mean 57.5 149.5 ± 34.7
Range 39.9-84.1
PO
0.5 to <2 3F, 5M
Mean 11.0 145.5 ± 29.1
Range 8.8-13.5
2 to <5 6F, 2M
Mean 15.6 172.0 ± 54.3
Range 12.7-21.8
5 to <10 3F, 5M
Mean 26.1 156.3 ± 38.5
Range 17.7-39.5
10 to <12 5F, 3M
Mean 42.5 144.5 ± 24.1
Range 26.4-68.2
12 to <16 6F, 2M
Mean 60.7 134.9 ± 26.0
Range 47.9-81.6
IV, intravenous dose; PO, oral dose. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) presented Figure 2. Mean values of levofloxacin plasma concentration versus
as mean ± SD. CLCR was calculated using the Schwartz formula.17 time profiles in children and adults receiving a single oral (PO) dose
of levofloxacin (children, 7 mg/kg; adults, 500 mg). Each symbol indi-
cates data for subjects in the corresponding age group.
Table II Summary of Levofloxacin Pharmacokinetic Estimates in Children Receiving a Single Dose (7 mg/kg)
Age Group, y n Cmax, µg/mL AUC0-∞, µg•h/mL t1/2, h tmax, h VDss/F, L/kg CL/F, L/h/kg
0.5 to 2
IV 6 5.19 ± 1.26 21.5 ± 6.1 4.1 ± 1.3 1 1.56 ± 0.30 0.35 ± 0.13
PO 8 4.21 ± 1.49 25.8 ± 9.2 5.0 ± 1.3 1.4 ± 0.4 2.32 ± 1.41 0.31 ± 0.13
2 to 5
IV 7 6.02 ± 1.07 22.7 ± 4.7 4.0 ± 0.8 1 1.50 ± 0.21 0.32 ± 0.08
PO 8 4.56 ± 0.83 25.9 ± 4.8 4.6 ± 1.3 1.6 ± 0.5 1.81 ± 0.62 0.28 ± 0.05
5 to 10
IV 10 7.30 ± 3.85 29.2 ± 6.4 4.8 ± 0.8 1 1.57 ± 0.44 0.25 ± 0.05
PO 8 4.64 ± 0.39 29.0 ± 10.0 5.3 ± 1.6 1.3 ± 0.4 1.88 ± 0.44 0.26 ± 0.06
10 to 12
IV 7 6.12 ± 1.19 39.8 ± 11.3 5.4 ± 0.8 1 1.44 ± 0.35 0.19 ± 0.05
PO 8 3.99 ± 0.87 37.3 ± 9.8 5.5 ± 0.7 1.9 ± 0.9 1.57 ± 0.43 0.20 ± 0.06
12 to 16
IV 10 6.34 ± 1.58 40.5 ± 7.6 6.0 ± 2.1 1 1.56 ± 0.53 0.18 ± 0.03
PO 8 4.76 ± 0.86 41.1 ± 6.8 5.8 ± 1.4 1.6 ± 1.0 1.40 ± 0.28 0.17 ± 0.04
IV 23 6.18 ± 1.04 48.3 ± 5.40 6.0 ± 1.0 1 1.27 ± 0.12 0.15 ± 0.02
PO 36 5.41 ± 1.68 49.3 ± 12.5 6.9 ± 1.5 1.1 ± 0.9 1.44 ± 0.40 0.14 ± 0.03
All data presented as mean ± SD. IV, intravenous dose; PO, oral dose; Cmax, maximum concentration; AUC0-∞, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to
infinity; t1/2, half-life; tmax, time to achieve Cmax; VDss/F, volume of distribution at steady state/bioavailability; CL/F, clearance/bioavailability.
a. Data on file, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey.
ence was observed for Cmax between the 5 age groups Table III Testing for Age Group Effect
and adults (P = .194). When Vd was normalized by
body weight, the pairwise comparisons were found not Parameter MSE F df P Value
to be significantly different, except the comparison be-
CL, L/h•kg 0.003 37.30 (5, 133) <.001a
tween children <2 years of age and adults (P = .0002). In
Vd, L/kg 0.268 3.57 (5, 133) .005a
contrast, levofloxacin apparent total body clearance Cmax, µg/mL 3.119 1.50 (5, 133) .194
(CL or CL/F, normalized by body weight) was shown to
CL, clearance; Vd, distribution; Cmax, maximum concentration; MSE, mean
vary as a consequence of age until approximately 10 square error.
years of age (Tables II to IV). a. Denotes significant at α = 0.05 level of significance.
Safety
were no clinically significant changes in laboratory
No subjects experienced a drug-related adverse event values from the predose to postdose evaluations.
that was considered serious or life threatening, and no
tendon- or joint-related adverse events were observed. DISCUSSION
All of the reported treatment-emergent adverse events
were considered by the investigator to be mild or mod- The results of these single-dose studies indicate that,
erate in severity. There was 1 serious adverse event of with the exception of CL or CL/F, the pharmacokinetics
wound dehiscence, but this was judged by the investi- of levofloxacin did not appear to vary as a consequence
gator to not be drug related. Proteinuria, indicated by of age between 6 months and 16 years (Table II). The ap-
positive dipstick, occurred in 2 patients but was re- parent total body clearance of levofloxacin was in-
solved spontaneously upon repeat evaluation. There versely associated with age (Table II, Figure 3). Specifi-
PEDIATRICS 157
CHIEN ET AL
Table IV Testing for Significance of Difference of Least Squares Means for Age Group
Parameter Age Group 2 to <5 Years 5 to <10 Years 10 to <12 Years 12 to 16 Years Adult
Data collected from the 3 studies indicate that a 2-com- children, especially for those younger than 5 years of
partment pharmacokinetic model with constant input age.
and first-order output (parameters listed in Table V),
which passed the goodness-of-fit and the Akaike and REFERENCES
Schwartz model selection criteria, is most appropriate
for dosing regimen simulation for children. On the ba- 1. Hurst M, Lamb HM, Scott LJ, Figgitt DP. Levofloxacin: an updated
sis of this PK/PD model, children of older age (≥5 years) review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections. Drugs. 2002;
would require a 10-mg/kg body weight dose once daily, 62:2127-2167.
whereas children of younger age (6 months to <5 years) 2. Fish DN, Chow AT. The clinical pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin.
should receive a 10-mg/kg dose every 12 hours. Pre- Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;32:101-119.
dicted steady-state levofloxacin exposures in children 3. Nightingale CH, Grant EM, Quintiliani R. Pharmacodynamics and
under these dosing regimens are presented in Table VI. pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin. Chemotherapy. 2000;46(suppl
1):6-14.
Safety, efficacy, and population pharmacokinetics of
4. Burkhardt JE, Hill MA, Turek JJ, Carlton WW. Ultrastructural
these dosing regimens are currently being evaluated in
changes in articular cartilages of immature beagle dogs dosed with
children 6 months to 16 years of age. Population difloxacin, a fluoroquinolone. Vet Pathol. 1992;29:230-238.
pharmacokinetic analysis will provide important con- 5. Burkhardt JE, Walterspiel JN, Schaad UB. Quinolone arthropathy
firmation, particularly because the sample size for each in animals versus children. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:1196-1204.
group in the current study was small. It is also impor- 6. Alghasham AA, Nahata MC. Clinical use of fluoroquinolones in
tant to recognize that these recommendations should children. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:347-359.
not be extrapolated to infants younger than 6 months of 7. Hampel B, Hullmann R, Schmidt H. Ciprofloxacin in pediatrics:
age, a population that has not yet been studied. worldwide clinical experience based on compassionate use—safety
The study results demonstrate that an age-dependent report. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:127-129.
difference in total body clearance of levofloxacin oc- 8. Schaad UB, Salam MA, Aujard Y, et al. Use of fluoroquinolones in
pediatrics: consensus report of an International Society of Chemo-
curs at a magnitude sufficient to warrant age-specific
therapy Commission. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:1-9.
dosing regimens. Extrapolation of dosing in children
9. Routledge PA. Pharmacokinetics in children. J Antimicrob
based on the defined pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin Chemother. 1994;34(suppl A):19-24.
in adults may result in insufficient drug exposure in
PEDIATRICS 159
CHIEN ET AL
10. San Joaquin VH, Stull TL. Antibacterial agents in pediatrics. In- action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003;
fect Dis Clin North Am. 2000;14:341-355. 349:1157-1167.
11. Wong FA, Juzwin SJ, Flor SC. Rapid stereospecific high-perfor- 15. Levaquin tablets/injection (levofloxacin tablets/injection) pre-
mance liquid chromatographic determination of levofloxacin in hu- scribing information. Raritan, NJ: Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical;
man plasma and urine. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1997;15:765-771. 2003.
12. Gibaldi M, Perrier D, eds. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed. New York: 16. Preston SL, Drusano GL, Berman AL, et al. Pharmacodynamics of
Marcel Dekker; 1982. levofloxacin: a new paradigm for early clinical trials. JAMA. 1998;
13. Chien S-C, Rogge MC, Gisclon LG, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile 279:125-129.
of levofloxacin following once-daily 500-milligram oral or intrave- 17. Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CMJ, Spitzer A. A simple
nous doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2256-2260. estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body
14. Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics. 1976;58:259-263.
JS, Kauffman RE. Developmental pharmacology—drug disposition,