Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Marking Criteria

    Uploaded by

    99. Nguyễn Đức Minh
    3 views1 page
    The document outlines criteria for evaluating oral presentations on a scale from excellent to fail, including clear and audible speaking, appropriate timing, engagement with audience, confidence with material, evidence of research, logical organization, clear arguments, use of relevant visual aids, preparation for questions, and coherent group work.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document outlines criteria for evaluating oral presentations on a scale from excellent to fail, including clear and audible speaking, appropriate timing, engagement with audience, confidence with material, evidence of research, logical organization, clear arguments, use of relevant visual aids, preparation for questions, and coherent group work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    3 views1 page

    Marking Criteria

    Uploaded by

    99. Nguyễn Đức Minh
    The document outlines criteria for evaluating oral presentations on a scale from excellent to fail, including clear and audible speaking, appropriate timing, engagement with audience, confidence with material, evidence of research, logical organization, clear arguments, use of relevant visual aids, preparation for questions, and coherent group work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    2.

    LECTURER FEEDBACK ON ORAL PRESENTATIONS

    EXCELLENT GOOD SATISFAC BELOW FAIL


    (70-100) (60-70) TORY AVERAGE (0-39)
    (50-60) (40-50)

     Clear and audible


     Appropriate timing
     Engaged with audience

     Confident with
    subject/material
     Evidence of research
     Able to explain key
    ideas/issues

     Logically organised
     Clear argument with relevant
    points
     Appropriate training

     Balanced evaluation of
    information/evidence
     Detailed analysis of material
    used

     All relevant to content


     Clear and legible
     Used appropriately

     Prepared for questions


     Handled questions
    knowledgeably

     Coherent group presentation


     Individual work well-
    integrated into whole

    You might also like