Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Blessing of Slavery
The Blessing of Slavery
The Blessing of Slavery
How does Fitzhugh compare the slavery of his day to the slavery of ancient Rome and
Greece?
Let's talk about how Fitzhugh compares slavery in his time to ancient Rome and Greece. He's
looking at how things were in the old days and saying, "See, they had slaves back then, so it's
normal for us to have slaves now." It's as if he's trying to make a point that because these big, fa-
mous places like Rome and Greece had slavery, it must be an okay thing to do. But here's the
deal: Fitzhugh's missing some big story parts. Slavery in ancient times wasn't the same as what
was happening in America during his time. Back then, slavery wasn't always about what race
you were, and sometimes, slaves could work their way up or even get out of being slaves. It
wasn't great, but it wasn't always as bad as the slavery Fitzhugh is talking about. Fitzhugh is
cherry-picking the history that makes his point look good. He's ignoring the parts where ancient
societies were different from his time. He's using history to say, "Slavery's been around forever,
so it's a normal part of life," but he's not being honest about how things were back then. What
he's doing is trying to make people think that because slavery was common in the past, it should
be accepted in his time too. He's using this old history to back up the slavery happening in Amer-
ica, trying to make it seem as if it's just the way things are supposed to be. But he's not giving the
full picture of how slavery worked back in ancient times, and he's definitely not talking about
how wrong slavery is, no matter when it happens. It's as if he's trying to make excuses for slav-
ery by saying, "Everyone else was doing it, so it's fine if we do it too."
So, the short answer? Yeah, Fitzhugh definitely sees race as a big deal when it comes to slavery.
He's got this idea that black people are somehow naturally cut out for being slaves. It's a pretty
messed-up way of thinking and super racist. Fitzhugh thinks that black folks don't have the same
get-up-and-go or smarts as white people. He says they're better off being slaves because they
can't handle being free. That's wrong, and it shows how people back then used racism to make
sense of slavery. It's as if, if they could convince themselves that black people were different and
somehow lesser, then they could feel okay about enslaving them. He even goes as far as to say
that black slaves are living better lives as slaves than they would if they were free. He thinks
they're happier and more looked after as slaves. That's a way to twist things to make slavery
sound not so bad. But it's all based on these racist ideas about black people being different from
white people. So Yes, Fitzhugh certainly believed race was crucial to the justification of slavery.
He's using these racist beliefs to argue why it's okay to enslave black people but not white peo-
ple. It's his way of trying to make slavery seem alright when more and more people were starting
to say it wasn't. He's basically saying, "Because they're black, they're meant to be slaves," which
is just plain wrong. This kind of thinking was a big part of how people back then defended slav-
ery, using race as a reason to keep it going.