Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exp 5 - FRS581
Exp 5 - FRS581
SAMPLE 2
BRAND: FABER-
CASTELL
TIP OF PEN: 1.0MM
TYPE OF PEN:
BALLPOINT PEN
COLOUR: RED
SAMPLE 3 & 4
BRAND: FABER-
CASTELL
TIP OF PEN: 0.7MM
TYPE OF PEN:
BALLPOINT PEN
COLOUR: BLACK
SAMPLE 5
BRAND: STAEDTLER
TIP OF PEN: 0.7MM
TYPE OF PEN:
BALLPOINT PEN
COLOUR: BLACK
SAMPLE 6
BRAND: SHINE
TIP OF PEN: 0.7MM
TYPE OF PEN:
BALLPOINT PEN
COLOUR: BLACK
Thin layer chromatography plate after being removed from mobile phase
1.2
𝑅𝑓 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 = = 0.39
3.1
DISCUSSION
Five different inks were utilized in this experiment: the blue, red, and black Faber-
Castell Ballpoint Pen, the black Staedtler Ballpoint Pen, and the black Shine Ballpoint Pen.
Three black inks that was different brand, a blue, red, and black ink that was the same brand
were utilized in this experiment. Only dissolved solutions were employed for the thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) plate inspection. Sample 1: Blue ballpoint ink can be divided into two
compounds; sample 2: Red ballpoint ink can only be divided into one compound; sample 3,4,5,
and 6: Black ballpoint ink can be divided into two compounds. Since the band's distance
travelled reached different level for same brand different colour; 1.2cm (sample 1), 2.3cm
(sample 2) and 2cm (sample 3) from the 1cm line at the bottom of the short edge of the TLC
plate), hence the Rf value of the ink is different for samples 1, 2 and 3 which were 0.39, 0.74
and 0.65 respectively. The second spot for sample 1 and 3 went slightly higher (2cm and 2.7cm
respectively from the bottom) than the first, and the Rf value is 0.65 and 0.87 respectively.
Sample 4, 5 and 6 (different brand same colour) has slightly the same distance travelled which
is 2.7cm, 2cm and 2.1cm respectively from the 1cm line at the bottom of the short edge of the
TLC plate, hence the Rf value has slightly same which were 0.84, 0.63 and 0.66 respectively.
It was same for second spot which have slightly same Rf value as shown in the table above.
Additionally, sample 3 and 4 supposedly have same or slightly same Rf value since both are
the same pen. Error may occur during TLC procedure which lead to a big different between Rf
value for sample 3 and 4.
QUESTIONS
1. Apart from TLC, what other methods can be used to differentiate ink?
Gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC), in addition to thin layer
chromatography (TLC), have been effectively employed in the analysis and comparison
of inks. They have two advantages over TLC: they produce data that is both quantitative
and qualitative, and they are both more sensitive than TLC, so that fewer ink plugs are
needed. Furthermore, a lot of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was
used. This process made it possible to identify every component of the ink. An infrared
spectrophotometer can also be used to characterize inks. With this method, the
absorption peaks of the solvent, colours, and additives are all shown at the same time
for all the components of the ink. As a result, when comparing two ink samples, IR is
a helpful technique for figuring out whether they could have come from the same
source. The fact that IR requires more sample than traditional chromatographic
techniques is one of its drawbacks.
One essential forensic method that might provide important details about a document
under investigation is ink analysis. Modern inks are enhanced with numerous
components to give them better qualities. The colouring substance, which might take
the form of dyes, pigments, or a combination of the two, is unquestionably the most
important element. The liquid body of the ink, sometimes referred to as the vehicle, is
soluble in dye molecules. Pigments, on the other hand, are made of insoluble multi-
molecular granules that have been finely ground and mixed with a medium. Document
examiners are often entrusted with determining the source of the ink as well as the type
of ink found on a contested document. Identifying the source of the ink on a document
can help examiners find forged entries or modifications. To demonstrate that it was not
included at the time the document was first written, a fraudulent entry in a will, for
example, could be added using ink that is chemically different from the rest of the
document but looks the same. While inks can be distinguished from one another by
visual inspection, non-destructive testing, and chemical analysis, it is unlikely that the
ink's source can be positively recognized. It is highly probable that the examiner will
be able to identify the ink precisely in terms of its type, class, and/or brand and conclude
that there is no scientific way to differentiate it from the suspected source.
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using TLC in ink analysis?
TLC is very inexpensive and easy to use. The few supplies needed for TLC are a
chamber, watch glass, capillary, plate, solvent, pencil, and UV lamp. The ideal solvent
can then be used with other methods, like high performance liquid chromatography
once it has been determined. Many compounds can be separated on a TLC plate if the
preferred mobile phase for each molecule is used. The TLC plate's solvents may be
readily switched out, and different solvents can be used depending on the desired
outcomes. As mentioned above, TLC can be used to guarantee a compound's purity. It's
easy to figure out the purity with UV light. The bulk of chemicals may be identified by
checking Rf literature values. It is easy to alter the chromatographic settings to improve
the optimization for resolution of a particular component. However, TLC plates don't
have very long stationary times. As a result, compared to other chromatographic
procedures, the separation time is lower. Furthermore, there is a noticeable increase in
the detection threshold. It would be necessary to use different chromatographic
techniques if a lower detection limit was required. Because TLC is an open system,
temperature and humidity may have an impact on chromatogram findings.
CONCLUSION
The experiment's findings, taken together, demonstrate that the distinctive
characteristics of handwriting on counterfeit documents and the ink analysis using the Thin-
Layer Chromatography technique were studied. Thin-Layer Chromatography can be used to
analyse ink samples, and the brand of pen used can be determined from the Rf values that are
obtained. UV light was used to the 6 samples. Sample 2 only created one distinct ink band on
the TLC plate, whereas sample 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 produced two. Samples 4, 5 and 6 have slightly
same Rf values which were 0.84, 0.63 and 0.66 respectively for their starting positions,
however Sample 1, 2 and 3’s Rf value were different which were 0.39, 0.74 and 0.65
respectively for their first position is 0.850. Both same brand different colour and different
brand same colour gave different results of Rf values.
REFERENCES
1. Flournoy, B. (2020, January 21). What is ballpoint pen ink made of? Sciencing.
Retrieved December 30, 2022, from https://sciencing.com/ballpoint-pen-ink-
made-of-10036405.html
2. History of gel pens. Gel Pen – Facts and History of Gel Pens. (n.d.). Retrieved
December 30, 2022, from http://www.historyofpencils.com/writing-
instruments-history/gel-penhistory/
3. Flournoy, B. (2020, January 21). What is ballpoint pen ink made of? Sciencing.
Retrieved December 30, 2022, from https://sciencing.com/ballpoint-pen-ink-
made-of-10036405.html
4. Judge, M. (2019, March 2). Factors that affect RF values in thin layer chromatography.
Sciencing. Retrieved December 30, 2022, from https://sciencing.com/factors-
valuesthin-layer-chromatography-8561359.html
5. Instruments used in ink analysis - forensic articles. Forensic Articles - Observe a Little
More © - Archana Singh. (2022, December 3). Retrieved December 30, 2022,
from https://forensicarticles.com/instruments-used-in-ink-analysis/