This document provides a summary of 27 key civil case laws from Indian courts between January 2020 and September 2020. Some of the important rulings include: the limitation period begins when the right to sue accrues, not when it first accrues; absolute exclusion of women from military command roles violates constitutional rights; high courts can entertain writ petitions even when there are factual disputes; and specific performance of contracts is no longer discretionary after the 2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act.
This document provides a summary of 27 key civil case laws from Indian courts between January 2020 and September 2020. Some of the important rulings include: the limitation period begins when the right to sue accrues, not when it first accrues; absolute exclusion of women from military command roles violates constitutional rights; high courts can entertain writ petitions even when there are factual disputes; and specific performance of contracts is no longer discretionary after the 2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act.
This document provides a summary of 27 key civil case laws from Indian courts between January 2020 and September 2020. Some of the important rulings include: the limitation period begins when the right to sue accrues, not when it first accrues; absolute exclusion of women from military command roles violates constitutional rights; high courts can entertain writ petitions even when there are factual disputes; and specific performance of contracts is no longer discretionary after the 2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act.
This document provides a summary of 27 key civil case laws from Indian courts between January 2020 and September 2020. Some of the important rulings include: the limitation period begins when the right to sue accrues, not when it first accrues; absolute exclusion of women from military command roles violates constitutional rights; high courts can entertain writ petitions even when there are factual disputes; and specific performance of contracts is no longer discretionary after the 2018 amendment to the Specific Relief Act.
CASE LAWS COMPILATION (JANUARY 2020 TO SEPTEMBER 2020)(CIVIL)
Sl. Name Court Legislation Citation Held
No. 01. Shri Uttam Chand (D) v. SC Limitation Act 2020 SCC Online Long and continuous possession by itself cannot be termed Nathu Ram (D) SC 37 as adverse possession so as to perfect title within the meaning of Article 65 of the Limitation Act 02. Shakti Bhog Food SC Limitation Act 2020 SCC Online Limitation period begins to run when the right to sue accrues Industries Ltd. V. The SC 482 and not when it 'first' accrues”. Central Bank of India & Anr 03. Punjab State Power SC Indian Special Leave ToThe Supreme Court has observed that a petition under Article Corporation Limited Constitution Appeal (C) No. 227 of the Constitution of India against dismissal of a petition Versus Emta Coal Limited 8482/2020 Dt. under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act can & Anr 18.09.2020 be entertained only when there is perversity in the order which leads to a patent lack of inherent jurisdiction. 04. Vidya Devi v. The State of SC Indian 2020 SCC State cannot invoke the doctrine of adverse possession to Himachal Pradesh and Constitution Online SC 14 perfect title over land grabbed from private citizens. The Ors Court held that forcible dispossession of a person from his private property is violative of human rights and constitutional right under Article 300A. 05. X v. Y SC Indian 2019 SCC Online Article 142 can be invoked to dissolve a marriage found to be Constitution SC 1636 a dead letter 06. The Secretary, Ministry of SC Indian Absolute exclusion of women from command assignments is Defence v. Babita Puniya Constitution against Article 14 of the Constitution and unjustified. & Ors 07. Laxmibai v. The Collector, SC Article 243 O Recourse to writ jurisdiction in election matters not Nanded & Ors of Indian appropriate when statute provides an alternative machinery. Constitution 08. Popatrao Vyankitrao Patil SC Article 226 of High Courts are not precluded from entertaining writ petitions v. State of Maharashtra: Indian even if there are disputed questions of facts. Law Constitution 09. Mukesh Kumar & Anr. v. SC Indian 2020 SCC Online No fundamental right to claim reservations in promotion State of Uttarakhand Constitution SC 148 10. In Re: Problems & SC Indian SUO MOTU No Travel Fare To Be Charged from Migrants; Notify Places Miseries of Migrant Constitution WRIT PETITION Providing Food For Stranded Migrants Workers: (CIVIL) No(s). 6/2020 d.o.d. 28.05.2020: 11. Shakeel Qureshi V. Union SC Indian 2020 SCC Online SC Imposes Costs of Rs. 10,000 and Dismisses Petition of India Constitution SC 306 : Seeking for Use of "Physical Distancing" Instead of "Social Distancing" 12. Sanisha Thomas V. Union SC Indian Writ Petition Women at advance stage of pregnancy must be given top of India Constitution (Civil) Dairy priority while effectuating cross-border evacuation No(s).11045/2020 DoD: 08.05.2020 13. Vijay Kishanrao Kurundkar SC Indian Civil Appeal No Appointment secured on the basis of a fraudulent caste Vs. State Of Maharashtra Constitution 1865 Of 2020 certificate is void ab initio & Ors: d.o.d 28.02.2020 14. Punjab And Sind Bank Vs. SC Indian Civil Appeal No Sexual harassment at workplace is an affront to women's Durgesh Kuwar Constitution 1809 Of 2020 Fundamental Rights d.o.d 25.02.2020 15. Padma Mishra Vs. State SC Indian (2020) 2 SCC 540 High Court in Article 226 proceedings does not adjudicate Of Uttarakhand Constitution correctness of allegations in FIR. 16. Union of India & Ors. vs. Lt SC Indian 2020 SCC Online Directing the Indian Navy to grant Permanent Commission Cdr Annie Nagaraja & Ors. Constitution SC 326 for Serving Women SSC Officers. 17. Ministry of Defence vs. SC Indian 2020 SCC Online Permanent Commission should be granted to women in the Babita Puniya & Ors. Constitution SC 200 army regardless of their service, in all the ten streams where the Union Government has already taken a decision to grant the Short Service Commission for women 18. Aryan Raj Vs. Chandigarh SC Indian Civil Appeal No. Persons with Disability to be given the same benefits as SC- Administration Constitution 2718 Of 2020 ST candidates in all domains d.o.d 13.07.2020 19. Vinay Eknath Lad v. Chiu SC Sec 116 of 2019 SCC Online The Supreme Court has observed that, though in a landlord Mao Chen IEA SC 1668 tenant suit, the landlord is not required to prove his title in the subject property as in a title-suit, but when his/her derivative title is challenged, the same has to be established in some form. 20. Purshottam Chopra v. SC IEA 2020 SCC Online 100% burn injuries by itself does not mean victim was State SC 6 incapable of making dying declaration. 21. Somasundaram @ Somu SC IEA 2020 SCC Online It would be unsafe to convict an accused solely based on V. The State Rep. By The SC 480 uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. Deputy Commissioner of Police : 22. Nazir Mohamed Vs. J. SC IEA 2020 SCC Online The Supreme Court observed that the presumption based on Kamala SC 676 the maxim 'possession follows title' that possession must be deemed to follow title, arises only where there is no definite proof of possession by anyone else. 23. B. Santoshamma Vs. D. SC SRA Civil Appeal Relief of specific performance of a contract is no longer Sarala- No.3574 Of 2009 discretionary, after the 2018 amendment. Decided On 18.09.2020 24. C.S. Venkatesh v. A.S.C. SC Section 16 of 2020 SCC Online In a suit for Specific Performance, plaintiff has to prove that Murthy SRA SC 143 he has means to generate consideration amount 25. Deccan Paper Mills Co. SC SRA 2020 SCC Online The Supreme Court held that an action instituted under Ltd. Vs. Regency Mahavir SC 655 section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is not an action in Properties &Ors. rem, but an action in personam, and therefore arbitrable. 26. Ambalal Sarabhai SC SRA 2020 SCC Online The Supreme Court has observed that strong prima facie Enterprise Ltd. v. KS SC 1 case on undisputed facts is necessary for getting the relief Infraspace LLP and of temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance of Another & Haryana contract. Containers Ltd. v. KS Infraspace LLP and Another : 27. Narasamma Vs. A. SC SRA 2020 SCC Online Plea of title and adverse possession cannot be advanced Krishnappa (Dead) SC 672 simultaneously and from the same date. 28. Mohammade Yusuf v. SC Registration 2020 SCC Online A compromise decree does not require registration if it does Rajkumar Act SC 125 not take in property that is not the subject - matter of the suit. 29. Ravinder Kaur Grewal V. SC Registration 2020 SCC Online Memorandum of family settlement binding on parties; does Manjit Kaur Act SC 612 not require registration. 30. Brahma Singh v. Union of SC O 2 Rule 2 of 2020 SCC Online The Supreme Court reiterated that the bar of Order II Rule 2 India CPC SC 131 of the Civil Procedure Code may not apply to a writ petitions. 31. Dahiben V. Arvindbhai SC Order VII Rule 2020 SCC Online If plaint does not disclose cause of action or suit is barred by Kalyanji Bhansuli 11 CPC of SC 562 any law, the court has no option but to reject the plaint. (Gajra)(D) Thr LRs CPC 32. M/S EXL Careers & Anr. V. SC Order VII RuleCIVIL APPEAL Suit in new court has to proceed de novo on return of plaint. Frankfinn Aviation 10 & 10A of NO(s). 2904 OF Services Pvt. Ltd. CPC 2020 d.o.d 05.08.2020 33. V.N. Krishna Murthy Vs. SC Section 96 of 2020 SCC Online Strangers cannot file appeal unless they satisfy the court that Ravi Kumar CPC SC 664 they are 'aggrieved persons'. 34. Guru Nanak Industries, SC Partnership 2020 SCC Online Retirement of one partner amounts to dissolution of Faridabad V. Amar Singh Act SC 469 partnership firm consisting of only two partners. (Dead) Thr.LR's 35. Shubham Singh v. State of P&H IT Act 2020 SCC Online Registered owner of a phone number from which offence is Punjab P&H 702 committed, has to take responsibility for the same. 36. Union of India vs. M/s. SC TPA 2020 SCC Online Protection u/s 53A of TPA available to person put in K.C. Sharma & Co. SC 644- possession and has agreement of lease in his favour. 37. State Of Madhya Pradesh SC Environmental 2020 SCC Online The Supreme Court has directed the State of Madhya Vs. Centre For law SC 687 Pradesh to suspend/cancel Registration Certificate of Environment Protection vehicles which do not possess a valid Pollution Under Control Research And Certificate and also to initiate penal measures against the Development owner and/or the person(s) in possession and/or control of the offending vehicle, in accordance with law. 38. Government Of India Vs. SC Arbitration 2020 SCC Online Enforcement court may refuse enforcement of foreign award, Vedanta Limited SC 749 but cannot set aside or correct it. 39. Perry Kansagra v. Smriti SC HMGA 2019 SCC Online Principle of confidentiality in mediation does not apply to Madan Kansagra SC 211 matters of child custody. 40. Valsala Nisha v. Rajesh Ker HC HMA 2020 SCC Online Convenience of lady is of paramount concern while Soman Nair Ker 3184 considering transfer petitions in matrimonial disputes. 41. Ranjith P.C. v. Asha Nair. Ker HC HMA 2020 SCC Online Wife’s persistent effort to separate husband from family P Ker 1751 amounts to cruelty: Divorce granted in favour of husband. 42. Dharmesh Vasantrai Shah Bom HMGA 2020 SCC Online Mother has an indefeasible legal right to natural guardianship v. Renuka Prakash Tiwari HC Bom 697 vis-à-vis an illegitimate child. 43. Vineeta Sharma V. SC HSA 2020 SCC Online Daughters have coparcenery rights even if their father was Rakesh Sharma SC 641 not alive when Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 came into force. 44. M. Arumugam v. SC HSA 2020 SCC Online Referring to Sections 6 and 8 of the Act, the Court said that Ammaniammal and SC 15 on death of a Hindu male, notional partition of his property Others will take place, and it will devolve on the legal heirs based on their respective shares. Therefore, such property will no longer retain the character of a 'Joint Family Property' after such partition. The heirs will take after the property as tenants-in-common and will enjoy joint possession till the property is demarcated on their respective shares as per a settlement deed. 45. Bhagwat Sharan Vs. SC HSA 2020 SCC Online Person who takes benefit of a portion of the will cannot Purushottam: SC 348 challenge the remaining portion. 46. Kalindi Damodar Garde (d) SC HAMA 2020 SCC online Children born to adoptee before his adoption entitled to v. Manohar Laxman SC 147 inherit his property in adoptive family Kulkarn 47. M. Vanaja Vs. M. Sarla SC HAMA 2020 SCC Online Consent of wife and actual ceremony of adoption essential Devi SC 311 for valid adoption.