Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Product Design (DE G531)

Product Development Process Tools

Course IC
Dr. Ganesh M. Bapat
Assistant Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Email: ganeshm@goa.bits-pilani.ac.in
BITS Pilani
K. K. Birla Goa Campus

24-08-2023
1 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Product Development teams summary
1. Characteristics of an effective team
2. Becoming effective team member
3. Team Roles
• Wilde’s Model
• Belbin Model
• Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

2 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Traditional teams
• Over the wall engineering approach:
• Each department throws the job “over the wall” when they think
they have finished their bit…only to have it thrown back for some
rework
• Slow serial process Long product development time+ costs
• Customer needs are lost in the process and the back and forth
between the departments

3 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Concurrent engineering
• Systematic approach to the integrated concurrent design of products
and their related processes, including manufacture and support
• Emerged from desire to shorten product development time, improve
quality and reduce product life cycle costs.

4 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Concurrent engineering
• Key elements:
• Cross-functional teams
• Parallel design
• Vendor partnering/ Early supplier involvement (ESI)

5 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Advantages of Concurrent engineering
• Shorter time to market • Reduced product
development costs

6 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Product development Organizations
• The scheme by which individual designers and developers are
linked together into groups
• The links between team members are based on:
• Reporting relationships
• Financial arrangements: BU’s, departments etc.
• Physical layout / Virtual layout
• Functional organization: links between those who perform
similar functions
• Project organization: links between those who work on the
same project

7 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Functional Organization
• Hierarchical organizational
structure where people are
grouped as per their area of
specialization
• People are supervised by a
functional manager expert in the
same area

8 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Functional Organization
Advantages:
• Employees are grouped by their knowledge and skills, which helps achieve the
highest degree of performance.
• Employees are very skilled. Efficiency is gained because they are experienced in the
same work and they perform very well.
• Roles and responsibilities are fixed, which facilitates easy accountability for the
work.
• Hierarchy is very clear and employees don’t have to report to multiple supervisors.
Each employee reports to functional manager, which reduces the number of
communication channels.
• No duplication of work because each department and each employee has a fixed
job responsibility.
• Employees feel secure and have a clear career growth path, and therefore, they
perform well without fear.
• Sense of job security tends to makes employees loyal to the organization.
• Excellent cooperation and communication within the department.

9 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Functional Organization
Disadvantages:
• Employees may feel bored due to the monotonous, repetitive type of work and
may lose enthusiasm for the job.
• If the performance appraisal system is not managed properly, conflicts may arise.
For example, an employee may feel demoralized when a lower performing employee
is promoted.
• The departments have a self-centered mentality. The functional manager pays
more attention to his department; he/she usually doesn’t care about other
departments.
• Communication is poor among the departments, which causes poor inter-
department coordination. This decreases flexibility and innovation. Moreover, there is
a lack of teamwork among different departments.
• Employees may have little concern and/or knowledge about events outside their
department. This causes obstacles in communication and cooperation.
• The functional structure is rigid, making adaptation to changes difficult and slow.
• Due to bureaucratic hierarchy, delays frequently occur in decision making.
10 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Functional Organization
Disadvantages:
• The functional manager may take decisions autocratically without
consulting his team members, which may not always work in favor of
the organization.
• When the organization becomes larger, functional areas can become
difficult to manage due to their size. Each department may start
behaving like a small company with its own facilities, culture, and
management style.
• Functional departments may be distracted by departmental goals,
and focus on them rather than the organizational goal.

11 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Project Organization
• Organizational activities are grouped into
programs or portfolios and implement them
through the projects.
• Project manager (PM) plays a crucial role in
the execution of the project. However, there
is very limited role for function manager.
• PM has full power and authority over
resources to be utilized in the project.
Controls the budget, resources, and work
assignments.
• The PM has full-time team members working
under his/her control who directly report
him/her.
• When the project is completed the team is
disbanded. Team members and all other
resources are released.

12 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Project Organization
Advantages:
• Since the team members directly report to the project manager, there is
a clear line of authority. This reduces conflict and makes decision
making faster and more flexible.
• Shorter lines of communication create strong and effective
communication within the project management team and response to
stakeholders’ concerns is fast.
• Due to a sense of urgency, milestones, good communication, and
cooperation, the learning curve is faster for new team members.
• Team members become versatile and flexible due to experience in
different kinds of projects.

13 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Project Organization
Disadvantages:
• Authority can make PM arrogant and impact the team dynamics and
initiate politics.
• Project deadline and usually a tight schedule makes the work
environment stressful.
• If the organization has multiple projects, there can be poor
communication among them, causing resources to be duplicated.
• Sense of insecurity among the team members, because once the
project is completed, they feel they may lose their jobs. Therefore, they
tend to be less loyal towards the organization.
• Cost of employees and equipment can be higher because of hiring
skilled people and specialized equipment for a shorter period of time.
If the project gets stretched out, the cost of equipment and other
resources can be much higher.
14 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Matrix/Hybrid Organizational Structure
• Individuals are linked to others according to project as well as
function.
• The functional manager may look after the functional part of the
project: decide how to do the work, and may distribute the project
work among subordinates.
• The PM will have authority over the administrative part of the project,
such as what to do, follow-up on the schedule, evaluate the
performance, etc.
• Working in a matrix organization can be challenging because you have
a confusing role while reporting to two bosses.
• To avoid confusion and work efficiently in a matrix organization, you
must be clear on your role, responsibilities, and the work priorities.
• Usually exists in large and multi-project organizations, where they can
relocate employees whenever and wherever their services are needed.
15 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Types of Matrix Organizational Structure
1. Lightweight: Strong functional links
2. Heavyweight: Strong project links
• Product development team (PDT)/ Integrated Product Team (IPT)
3. Balanced: Both managers with equal power and authority

16 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Matrix/Hybrid Organizational Structure
Advantages:
• Highly skilled and capable resources can be shared between the
functional units and projects, allowing more open communication
lines which help in sharing the valuable knowledge within the
organization.
• More dynamic than the functional structure because it allows
employees to communicate more readily across the boundaries,
creating a good, cooperative, work environment
• Employees can broaden their skills and knowledge areas by
participating in different kinds of projects. Provides a good
environment for professionals to learn and grow their careers.
• In functional departments, employees are very skilled, and project
teams can get these highly-skilled employees whenever their services
are needed.
• Since there is a sense of job security, employees tend to be loyal to
the organization and perform well, and therefore, the efficiency of a
matrix organization is higher.
17 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Matrix/Hybrid Organizational Structure
Disadvantages:
• Employees report to two managers, which adds to confusion and
may cause conflict.
• A conflict may arise between the project manager and the
functional manager regarding the authority and power.
• If the priorities are not defined clearly, employees may be
confused about their role and responsibility.
• Scarcity of resources leads to competition, which may cause
hostility within the workplace and could affect the operations.
• It is generally perceived that matrix organizations have more
managers than required, which increases overhead costs.
• The workload tends to be high. Employees have to do their
regular work along with the additional project-related work,
which can exhaust them.
18 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Overcoming disadvantages of Matrix organization
• Close cooperation between the project manager and the functional
manager.
• Proper and balanced distribution of authority and power between the
project manager and the functional manager.
• Any conflict between the project manager and the functional manager
must be resolved as early as possible, and in private.
• Well defined and strong communication in all directions. This is
important to gain support from executives, managers, supervisors, and
employees.
• Organizations must communicate their vision, objective, and goal with
their employees.
• Roles and responsibilities must be clearly documented and
communicated to all employees to avoid confusion.

19 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus


Distributed product development teams
• Covid-19 and developments in communication/digital
technology has widened scope
• Pros:
• Access to information about regional markets
• Access to specialized resources
• Availability of technical expertise
• Favorable location of manufacturing facilities and supplies
• Local outsourcing to increase product development capacity
• Cost saving through lower wages, infrastructure costs etc.
• Cons:
• Weaker ties between team members
• Difficult project coordination
• Higher project coordination costs
20 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Choosing an Organizational Structure??
• Importance of cross-functional integration
• Project organizations tend to enable strong cross-functional
integration
• Criticality of cutting-edge functional expertise to business
success
• Areas where disciplinary expertise must be developed and retained
over several product generations
• Ex- Aerospace industry, Automobile industry, Defence industry
• Utilization of man-power for most of the duration of the
project
• Speed of product development
• Project organizations are faster than functional organizations in
developing innovative products.
21 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
Any questions?

Thank you!

22 BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus

You might also like