The parties were married to others but cohabited and started a business together. When they separated, the male party demanded a share of the properties acquired during their cohabitation, which were registered under the female party's name. The court held that no implied trust existed under Article 1452 of the Civil Code, as the legal relationship between the parties is covered by Article 148 of the Family Code, which considers all jointly acquired properties during their actual contributions as co-ownership. As co-owners, each party is a trustee of the other over the properties.
The parties were married to others but cohabited and started a business together. When they separated, the male party demanded a share of the properties acquired during their cohabitation, which were registered under the female party's name. The court held that no implied trust existed under Article 1452 of the Civil Code, as the legal relationship between the parties is covered by Article 148 of the Family Code, which considers all jointly acquired properties during their actual contributions as co-ownership. As co-owners, each party is a trustee of the other over the properties.
The parties were married to others but cohabited and started a business together. When they separated, the male party demanded a share of the properties acquired during their cohabitation, which were registered under the female party's name. The court held that no implied trust existed under Article 1452 of the Civil Code, as the legal relationship between the parties is covered by Article 148 of the Family Code, which considers all jointly acquired properties during their actual contributions as co-ownership. As co-owners, each party is a trustee of the other over the properties.
Facts: Mallilin and Castillo were alleged to be both married and with children but separated from their respective spouses and cohabited in 1979 while respective marriages still subsist. During their union, they established Superfreight Customs Brokerage Corporation in which Mallilin was the President and Chairman and Castillo as Vice President and Treasurer. They likewise acquired real and personal properties which were registered solely in Castillo’s name. The couple separated, and petitioner demanded his share of the properties, but respondent refused, claiming exclusive ownership. Furthermore, respondent denied that she and petitioner lived as husband and wife because they were still legally married at the time of cohabitation. Issue: Whether or not implied trust existed between the parties pursuant to Article 1452 of the Civil Code Held: No. The Court held that the legal relation of the parties is already specifically covered by Art. 148 of the Family Code under which all the properties acquired by the parties out of their actual joint contributions of money, property or industry shall constitute a co- ownership. Co-ownership is a form of trust and every co-owner is a trustee for the other. The provisions of Art. 1452 and Art. 1453 of the Civil Code, then are no longer material since a trust relation already inheres in a co-ownership which is governed under Title III, Book II of the Civil Code.
Agapay vs. Agapay 287 SCRA 340 Topic: Property Regime of Unions Without Marriage: Unions Under FC 148 Doctrine: Art. 148: Only Properties Acquired by Both Through Actual Joint