PROPOSAL DEMONSTRATION (10%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT50114

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:

STUDENT NAME S2: REGISTRATION S2:

NUMBER
S3: S3:

Proposal Demonstration Score Student Score

Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

1. Leadership

Demonstrates
Demonstrates clear Demonstrates less
Demonstrates very moderate evidence
evidence of the evidence of the
1.1 Effective clear evidence of the of the ability to
ability to lead ability to lead
leadership ability to lead group lead group
group members group members 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
(Project Objective) members effectively members
effectively in effectively in
in achieving effectively in
achieving achieving
objectives achieving
objectives objectives
objectives
 Proposal Demonstration Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

Able to
Able to Able to
Very clear demonstrate
demonstrate demonstrate
evidence of evidence of
1.2 Knowledge and evidence of evidence of
knowledge and knowledge and
skills in leadership knowledge and knowledge and 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
understanding understanding in
(Project Objective) understanding in understanding in
demonstrated in practice and
practice practice with major
practice require minor
moderately improvements
improvements.

2. Teamwork

Able to
Attempt to
Show clear demonstrate in
Able to demonstrate demonstrate in
evidence to practice the ability
in practice the ability practice the ability to
assume alternate to assume alternate
to assume alternate alternate roles as a
2.1 Alternate role roles as a group roles as a group
roles as a group group leader and 10 ( / 4 ) *10
leader and a group leader and group
leader and a group group members but
member members with
member to achieve with limited effect
demonstrated in some effect(s) and
the same goal and require
practice require minor
improvements
improvements

Able to foster Able to foster

High ability to
relationship and relationship and
foster good Able to foster good
work together with work together with
relationship and relationship and
other group other group
2.2 Foster good work together work together with
members towards members towards 10 ( / 4 ) *10
relationship effectively with other group
goal achievement goal achievement
other group members towards
with some effect(s) but with limited
members towards goal achievement
and require minor effect and require
goal achievement
improvements improvements
 Proposal Demonstration Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

Able to very well Limited respect and

Able to well respect Able to respect and
respect and acceptance of
2.3 Respect and and accept opinion accept opinion of
accept opinion of others’ opinions in 10 ( / 4 ) *10
accept opinions of others in achieving others in achieving
others in achieving achievement group’s
group’s objectives group’s objectives
group’s objectives objectives

3. Autonomous
learning
New Idea
(Problem Describe an Describe good new Describe moderate Describe less
Statement) excellent new idea ideas to solve new ideas to solve effective new ideas 20 ( / 4 ) * 20
(Project Literature) to solve problems problems problems to solve problems
(Methodology)
(Costing)
(References)

Consistent in Strive to become Minimize self -

Fully engage in
engaging for accustomed to involvement in
4. Self-involvement independent 10 ( / 4 ) *10
independent independent independent
learning
learning learning learning
5. Social
responsibility
Contribution to Describe very Describe Describe poorly
Describe clearly
community or clearly project moderately project project
project contributions
stakeholder contributions to contributions to contributions to 20 ( / 4 ) *20
to community or
(Background) community or community or community or
stakeholder
(Scope) stakeholder stakeholder stakeholder
(Significance)
(Costing)

Total Score ( 100)

Proposal Presentation Score (10%)

Formula = (Total Score/100 * 10)
 PROJECT DEMONSTRATION 1 (10%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT50114

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:

STUDENT NAME S2: REGISTRATION S2:

NUMBER
S3: S3:

Project Demonstration 1 Score Student Score

Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

1. Progress of
More than 40% More than 30% More than 20% Less than 20%
Project 20 ( / 4 ) * 20
complete complete complete complete
Development

Clearly explain
the design of Able to explain the Explain the project Show the project
2. Interface/
project project structure structure design in structure design 20 ( / 4 ) * 20
Structure Design
structure in design briefly. general only. without explanations.
details.

The project The project content The project

The project content
3. Content and content does does offer 60% content does offer
does offer 20% solution 20 ( / 4 ) * 20
Concept of Project offer 80% solution solution to the 40% solution to the
to the problem.
to the problem. problem. problem.

Implement a very Implement a

Implement a clear
4. System Security clear system moderate system Implement a fair
system security
and Features/ security and security and system security and
and features 20 ( / 4 ) *20
Exceptional features features features /Exceptional
/Exceptional
Handling /Exceptional /Exceptional Handling
Handling
Handling Handling
 Project Demonstration 1 Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

Test cases are Test cases are

Test cases are clearly Test cases are fairly
very clearly tested moderately tested
tested with tested with expected
5. Testing with expected with expected 20 ( / 4 ) *20
expected output and output and actual
output and actual output and actual
actual output output
output output

Total Score ( 100)

Project Demonstration 1 Score (10%)

Formula = (Total Score/100 * 10)
 PROJECT DEMONSTRATION 2 (10%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT50114

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:

STUDENT NAME S2: REGISTRATION S2:

NUMBER
S3: S3:

Project Demonstration 2 Score Student Score

Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard
S1 S2 S3
(%)

1. Progress of
Progress more than Progress more than Progress more than Progress less than
Project 20 ( / 4 ) * 20
80% complete 65% complete 50% complete 50% complete
Development

Clearly explain the Show the project

Able to explain the Explain the project
2. Interface/ design of project structure design
project structure structure design in 20 ( / 4 ) *20
Structure Design structure in without
design briefly. general only.
details. explanations

The project The project content The project content The project
3. Content and content does offer does offer 80% does offer 60% content does offer
20 ( / 4 ) * 20
Concept of Project 100% solution to solution to the solution to the 40% solution to
the problem. problem. problem. the problem.
 Project Demonstration 2 Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard
S1 S2 S3
(%)
Implement a very Implement a
Implement a clear Implement a fair
4. System Security and clear system moderate system
system security and system security
Features/ security and security and
features and features 20 ( / 4 )*20
Exceptional features features
/Exceptional /Exceptional
Handling /Exceptional /Exceptional
Handling Handling
Handling Handling

Test cases are

Test cases are very Test cases are clearly Test cases are
moderately tested
clearly tested with tested with expected fairly tested with
5. Testing with expected 20 ( / 4 )*20
expected output and output and actual expected output
output and actual
actual output output and actual output
output

Total Score ( 100)

Project Demonstration 2 Score (10%)

Formula = (Total Score/100 * 10)
 PROJECT DEMONSTRATION 3 (15%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT50114

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:

STUDENT NAME S2: REGISTRATION S2:

NUMBER
S3: S3:

Project Demonstration 3 Score Student Score

Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)
Project is 100% Project is more Project is more Project is less than
1. Project
complete and than 80% complete than 50% complete 50% complete and
achievement and 12.5 ( / 4) *12.5
achieve all and achieve all and achieve a few achieve only one
objective
objectives objectives objectives objective

Several Only one

All requirements No requirement
2. User Requirements requirements were requirement were 12.5 ( /4)*12.5
were met. were met
met met

Excellently Clearly describes Moderately Generally not clear

describes how the how the system describes how the describes how the
3. Construction and
system was was constructed system was system was 12.5 ( / 4) *12.5
functionality
constructed and and how it constructed and constructed and
how it functions functions how it functions how it functions
 Project Demonstration 3 Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

Clearly Moderately Generally not clear

Excellently
communicated communicated communicated
communicated
feasibility of feasibility of feasibility of
feasibility of
4. Feasibility construction and construction and construction and 12.5 ( /4)*12.5
construction and
implementation implementation implementation
implementation
most of the time most of the time most of the time
most of the time
with minor error with minor error with minor error

Product shows an Product shows

Product shows a
5. Originality excellent genuine moderate amount Copied product 12.5 ( /4)*12.5
good genuine idea
idea of genuine idea

Provide strong
evidence through Provide strong
market surveys evidence such as Provide a few
AND have a client market surveys OR evidence from both
Least attempt is made
6. Marketability (with proof) OR have a client (with sources of 12.5 ( /4)*12.5
for a market potential
recognition from proof) OR newspapers, blogs,
outside parties (lab recognition from social media or etc
tested, MyIPO, outside parties
testemonial)

Excellent ideas, Good ideas, Moderate ideas,

Least creative ideas
7. Creativity creative and creative and creative and 12.5 ( /4)*12.5
and inventive.
inventive. inventive. inventive.
 Project Demonstration 3 Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

8. System Excellent Good Moderate Least

Security, implementation of implementation of implementation of implementation of
12.5 ( /4)*12.5
Features and user controls and user controls and user controls and user controls and
Testing validation controls validation controls validation controls validation controls

Total Score ( 100)

Project Demonstration 3 Score (15%)

Formula = (Total Score/100 * 15)
 FINAL PRESENTATION (POSTER) (15%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT50114

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:

STUDENT NAME S2: REGISTRATION S2:

NUMBER
S3: S3:

Final Presentation (Poster) Score Student Score

Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)
Details on the Details on the
Details on the Details on the
poster capture the poster relate to the
poster include poster have little or
important topic but are too
important nothing to do with
information about general or
1. Contents information but the main topic that 20 ( /4)*20
the topic and incomplete. The
audience may need makes it hard for
increase the audience needs
more information the audience to
audience’s more information
to fully understand understand
understanding to understand.

all graphics used are

All graphics are All graphics are
related to the topic Graphics do not
related to the topic related to the topic
and the choice of relate to the topic
2. Use Of Graphics and usage the fonts and usage the fonts 20 ( /4)*20
fonts and colors usage the fonts and
and colors are and colors are
are affective/ colors are poor.
good. acceptable.
interesting

Information is very
organized, but
Information is very Information is very
titles and The Information
organized with organized with
3. Organization subheadings are appears to be 20 ( /4)*20
clear titles and titles and
missing or do not disorganized.
subheadings subheadings
help the reader to
understand
 Final Presentation (Poster) Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)
Most of the Most of the
All information on
information on the information on the
the poster is in Most of the
poster is in focus poster is in focus
focus and can be information on the
4. Layout And Design and the content and the content 20 ( /4)*20
easily viewed and poster is unclear or
easily viewed and easily viewed and
identified from 6 too small
identified from 6 identified from 4
feet away
feet away feet away

Almost no A few no
No grammatical, Many grammatical,
grammatical, grammatical,
5. Mechanics spelling or spelling or 20 ( /4)*20
spelling or spelling or
punctuation errors. punctuation errors.
punctuation errors. punctuation errors.

Total Score ( 100)

Final Presentation (Poster) Score (15%)

Formula = (Total Score/100 * 15)
 FINAL PRESENTATION (15%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT50114

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:

STUDENT NAME S2: REGISTRATION S2:

NUMBER
S3: S3:

Final Presentation Score Student Score

Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

1. Verbal Communication

Able to deliver ideas

Able to deliver ideas
1.1 Clear Delivery of Able to deliver ideas Able to deliver ideas fairly and require
but require further 20 ( /4)*20
Ideas with great clarity clearly minor
improvements
improvements

Able to deliver ideas

Able to deliver ideas
Able to deliver ideas with limited
1.2 Confident Able to deliver ideas fairly and require
with great confidence and 20 ( /4)*20
Delivery of Ideas confidently minor
confidence require further
improvements
improvements.

Able to deliver ideas

1.3 Effective and Able to deliver ideas Able to deliver ideas Able to deliver ideas
fairly effectively and
Articulate with great effect and effectively and with limited effect and 20 ( /4)*20
require minor
Delivery of Ideas articulate articulately poor articulation.
Improvements.
 Final Presentation Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

Able to deliver ideas

Able to deliver ideas Able to deliver ideas with limited
Able to fully deliver
1.4 Adapt Delivery To appropriately to appropriately to appropriateness to
ideas appropriately 20 ( /4)*20
Audience Level the target audience the target audience the target audience
very well
well satisfactorily and require further
Improvements.

Able to understand
1.5 Audience
Able to fully Able to understand and answer
Engagement: Able to understand
understand and and answer questions but not
Understand and and respond to 20 ( /4)*20
respond to questions able to accurately
Respond To questions well
questions very well satisfactorily answer the
Question
question

Total Score ( 100)

Final Presentation Score (15%)

Formula = (Total Score/100 * 15)
 LOG BOOK (10%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT50114

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:

STUDENT NAME S2: REGISTRATION S2:

NUMBER
S3: S3:

Log Book Score Student Score

Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

Weekly activities Weekly activities Weekly activities

1. Written Activities Weekly activities
written more than written more than written more than 30 ( / 4 ) * 30
- refer checklist written less than 30%
90% 60% 30%

More than 90% of

More than 60% of the More than 30% of the Less than 30% of the
2. Signature of the supervisor’s
supervisor’s signature supervisor’s signature supervisor's signature
verification signatures of 30 ( / 4 ) * 30
of verification are of verification are of verification are
- refer checklist verification are
shown. shown. shown.
shown.
 Log Book Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

Students are able to

Students are able to
perform and describe Progress more than 35%
Students are able to perform the project
3. Performance of the project activities complete but students
perform and describe activities but have
Psychomotor accordingly with are not able to perform 40 ( / 4 ) * 40
the project activities difficulties to describe it
Skills appropriate accordingly. and describe the project
accordingly.
illustration / activities accordingly.
example.

Total Score ( 100)

Log Book Score (10%)

Formula = (Total Score/100 * 10)
 CHECKLIST

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT50114

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:

STUDENT NAME S2: REGISTRATION NUMBER S2:

S3: S3:

Number of Week* Activities Written Sign by Supervisor

S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3

Week 1 Week 1

Week 2

Week 3 Week 2

Week 4

Week 5 Week 3

Week 6

Week 7 Week 4

Week 8
Week 9 Week 5

Week 10

Week 11 Week 6

Week 12

Week 13 Week 7

Week 14

Percentage
 TECHNICAL REPORT (15%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT50114

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:

STUDENT NAME S2: REGISTRATION S2:

NUMBER
S3: S3:

Technical Report Score Student Score

Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

Describe moderate
Describe excellent and Describe good Describe poor
1. Abstract abstract sentence
specific abstract abstract sentence abstract sentence
- Project problem with moderate
sentence without without grammatical with many
- Purpose grammatical errors. 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
grammatical errors. errors. grammatical errors.
- Scope Moderate
Excellent explanations Good explanations of Poor explanations of
- Method explanations of the
of the project. the project the project.
project

2. Project Plan
- Introduction
Describe excellent
- Problem
and specific Describe good Describe moderate Describe poor
statement
sentence for sentence for project sentence for project sentence for project
- Objective
project plan with plan with potential, plan with potential, plan without any
- Scope 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
specific potential, business business potential, business
- Literature
business / /entrepreneur ideas /entrepreneur ideas /entrepreneur ideas
review
entrepreneur ideas and plan. and plan. and plan.
- Methodology
and plan.
- Gantt Chart
 Technical Report Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)
3. Requirement
Specification
- Functional
Requirement
- Non-Functional
All requirements
Requirement Only 3 requirements Only 2 requirements Only 1 requirement is
are excellently
- Hardware and are clearly describe are clearly describe and clearly describe and
describe and shows
Software and shows good shows moderate shows weak potential to 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
very good potential
Requirement potential to market potential to market the market the
to market the the project/product.
- System project/product. project/product.
project/product.
Configuration
- Security
Requirement /
Exceptional
Handling

Excellently shows Clearly shows Moderately shows Poorly shows process in

process in design and process in design and process in design and design and very well
4. Final Design very well suited for very well suited for very well suited for suited for 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
commercialization commercialization commercialization commercialization
purposes. purposes. purposes. purposes.

Use excellent Use good testing Use moderate

Use poor testing
testing technique and technique and testing technique and
technique and
5. Test suitable data. suitable data. suitable data.
suitable data.
Description and 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
Results Excellent result Good result Moderate result
Poor result
elaboration. elaboration. elaboration.
elaboration.

Excellent list the Clearly list the Moderately list the Poor list the
6. Major Findings
advantages and advantages and advantages and advantages and 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
and Discussions
disadvantages disadvantages disadvantages disadvantages
 Technical Report Score Student Score
Aspects
Very Good (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Weak (1) Weightage Standard S1 S2 S3
(%)

Excellent
Clear elaboration of Moderate elaboration Poor elaboration of the
elaboration of the
7.1 Conclusions the conclusion and of the conclusion and conclusion and 5 ( /4)*5
conclusion and
recommendations recommendations. recommendations.
recommendations.

Excellently stated
Clearly stated the Moderately stated the
the future work that No future work stated
future work that can future work that can be
can be done to to extend the
7.2 Recommendations be done to extend the done to extend the 5 ( /4)*5
extend the project/product in to
project/product in to project/product in to
project/product in to the market. the market.
the market.
the market.

References are
significant to project References are
organized and References are Reference is not
and very organized
8. References significant to project significant to project significant to the project 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
with well-
and follow APA and follow APA format. but follow APA format.
constructed using format.
APA format.
The ideas are
written with very The ideas are written The ideas are written
The ideas are written
clear, detailed and with clear, detailed with fair detail and high
9. Organization of poorly and no impact
high impact and have a few impact impact reflection that 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
Ideas reflection that suit
reflection that suit reflection that suit suit entrepreneurial
entrepreneurial mind. entrepreneurial mind.
entrepreneurial mind mind.
(client need).

Shows excellent
Shows good real-life Shows moderate real-
real-life problem Shows poor real-life
10. Entrepreneur problem solving with life problem solving
solving with problem solving with 10 ( / 4 ) * 10
Mindset entrepreneur mind with entrepreneur
entrepreneur set. entrepreneur mindset.
mindset.
mindset.

Total Score ( 100)

Technical Report Score (15%)

Formula = (Total Score/100 * 15)