Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Main
Main
Irakliy Abramov, MD, PhD, Mohamed A. Labib, MD, CM, David Altshuler, MD, Lena
Mary Houlihan, MD, MCH, PhD, MRCS, Nicolas I. Gonzalez-Romo, MD, Evan Luther,
MD, Michael E. Ivan, MD, Michael T. Lawton, MD, Jacques J. Morcos, MD, Mark C.
Preul, MD
PII: S1878-8750(23)01534-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.132
Reference: WNEU 21363
Please cite this article as: Abramov I, Labib MA, Altshuler D, Houlihan LM, Gonzalez-Romo NI, Luther E,
Ivan ME, Lawton MT, Morcos JJ, Preul MC, Step-by-step dissection of the extreme lateral transodontoid
approach to the anterior craniovertebral junction: surgical anatomy and technical nuances, World
Neurosurgery (2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.132.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition
of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of
record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published
in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that,
during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal
disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
f
Resources: MCP
oo
Software: n/a
r
Supervision: IA, MCP
Validation: n/a
-p
re
Visualization: n/a
lP
f
Nicolas I. Gonzalez-Romo, MD1
oo
Evan Luther, MD2
r
-p
Michael E. Ivan, MD2
re
Michael T. Lawton, MD1
lP
1
Department of Neurosurgery
Jo
Phoenix, Arizona
2
Department of Neurosurgery
Miami, Florida
Correspondence: Mark C. Preul, MD
E-mail: Neuropub@barrowneuro.org
f
oo
DISCLOSURES: The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the
r
-p
FINANCIAL SUPPORT: This study was supported by funds from the Newsome Chair in
re
Neurosurgery Research held by Dr. Preul and by the Barrow Neurological Foundation.
lP
f
Lena Mary Houlihan, MD, MCH, PhD, MRCS1
oo
Nicolas I. Gonzalez-Romo, MD1
r
-p
Evan Luther, MD2
re
Michael E. Ivan, MD2
lP
1
Department of Neurosurgery
Phoenix, Arizona
2
Department of Neurosurgery
Miami, Florida
Abramov I et al. 2
E-mail: Neuropub@barrowneuro.org
f
oo
DISCLOSURES: The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the
r
-p
drugs, materials, or devices described in this manuscript.
re
FINANCIAL SUPPORT: This study was supported by funds from the Newsome Chair in
lP
Neurosurgery Research held by Dr. Preul and by the Barrow Neurological Foundation.
na
ABSTRACT
aggressive management. However, the lesions can be difficult to reach, and the surgical
procedure is difficult to understand. The aim of this study was to create a procedural, stepwise
microsurgical educational resource for junior trainees to learn the surgical anatomy of the
Methods: Ten formalin-fixed, latex-injected cadaveric heads were dissected under an operative
f
oo
microscope. Dissections were performed under the supervision of a graduated, skull base
fellowship-trained neurosurgeon who has advanced skull base experience. Key steps of the
r
-p
procedure were documented with a professional camera and a high-definition video system. A
re
relevant clinical case example was reviewed to highlight the principles of the selected approach
lP
and its application. The clinical case example also describes a rare complication: a
na
Results: Key steps of the ELTOA include patient positioning, skin incision, superficial and deep
ur
muscle dissection, vertebral artery dissection and transposition, craniotomy, clivus drilling,
Jo
Conclusions: The ELTOA is a challenging approach, but it allows for significant access to the
anterior craniovertebral junction, which increases the likelihood of gross total lesion resection.
Given the complexity of the approach, substantial training in the dissection laboratory is required
morbidity.
KEYWORDS: Chordoma; clivus; dissection; far lateral; pseudoaneurysm; skull base; vertebral
artery
ABBREVIATIONS: CN, cranial nerve; CVJ, craniovertebral junction; ELTOA, extreme lateral
f
r oo
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
Abramov I et al. 5
INTRODUCTION
Surgical treatment of lesions involving the anterior craniovertebral junction (CVJ) can be
challenging due to the anatomical complexity of the region. Small unilateral intradural lesions
located at the anterolateral CVJ can be accessed via the far lateral approach.1-4 Extra-intradural
lesions of the anterior CVJ with a predominantly midline location require an endoscopic
management that can often be accomplished via the extreme lateral approach when the surgeon
f
possesses the requisite intricate anatomical knowledge.7-9
oo
Different modifications of the extreme lateral approach may be selected, depending on
r
-p
the extension of the lesion; these approaches include the transfacetal, transcondylar-
re
transtubercular, transjugular, and complete transcondylar approaches.10 Here, we focus on the
lP
microsurgical anatomy and describe the sequential steps of the extreme lateral transodontoid
na
approach (ELTOA), one of the most aggressive variations of the extreme lateral approaches
offering maximal exposure to the anterior CVJ. The ELTOA involves significant tissue
ur
dissection and bony resection and therefore requires extensive anatomical knowledge of the
Jo
lateral and anterior CVJ landscapes visualized from this perspective. Understanding the complex
relationships of the many vital neural and vascular structures encountered in multiple dissection
Although other publications have described the technical steps of different extreme
lateral approaches, the surgical procedure remains difficult to understand.7-13 Previous laboratory
investigations partially discuss the steps of the ELTOA and rely mainly on illustrations or
operative videos that may be challenging to interpret without the proper surgical anatomy
background and tend to be more suitable for experienced audiences.8, 10, 11, 13 The aim of this
Abramov I et al. 6
study is to create a stepwise, procedural, educational resource to teach junior trainees the
challenging surgical anatomy of the ELTOA. We depict the surgical nuances of the ELTOA in
provide a didactic video to enhance the visualization and perspectives of the dissection. In
addition, we provide a clinical case example to highlight and rationalize the core surgical steps.
f
oo
Ten formalin-fixed, latex-injected cadaveric heads were used. Nine sequential unilateral
r
-p
essential anatomical knowledge and to develop the expected dissection quality level. The tenth
re
ELTOA was completed in a meticulous dissection of the cadaveric specimen to delineate the
lP
important nuances of the surgical anatomy in the approach and to document the exposure for
na
operating microscope (OPMI Pentero, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oberkochen, Germany) under the
ur
anatomical experience (M.A.L.). Key steps of the procedure were documented with a
professional camera (EOS 5DS R DSLR, Canon Global, Ota City, Tokyo, Japan) with a 50.6-
megapixel sensor and a 100-mm macro lens, as well as a high-definition video system (Zeiss
Trenion 3D HD, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG). A relevant clinical case was also reviewed to highlight
the approach selection and application principles. Institutional review board approval was not
RESULTS
After anesthesia induction, the patient is positioned in a park bench position with the
head secured in the 3-pin skull clamp, with the side of the lesion upward (Figure 1A). In
addition, the head is slightly abducted downward and rotated toward the shoulder contralateral to
the side of the lesion, with the mastoid tip at the highest point in the field (Figure 1B-1D).
f
oo
cranial nerves (CNs) VI, VII, and IX to XII.
r
Skin Incision and Musculocutaneous Dissection
-p
re
Planning the skin incision begins with identifying the relevant surface anatomical
lP
landmarks, which include the angle of the mandible, the mastoid process, the superior nuchal
na
line, and an imaginary line projected from the inion to the C2-C3 vertebrae, approximating the
midline (Figure 2A, Video 1). After the landmarks are identified, the skin is incised in a
ur
horseshoe fashion, originating several centimeters below the tip of the mastoid process at the
Jo
angle of the mandible. The incision continues in a caudal-cranial direction over the
sternocleidomastoid muscle to the superior nuchal line before turning and extending downward
The skin flap is reflected inferiorly (Figure 2B). Initial soft tissue dissection exposes the
suboccipital region, with the surgeon performing elevation of the superficial muscle layers of the
sternocleidomastoid, splenius, longissimus and semispinalis capitis, and the deep muscle layers
of the superior oblique, inferior oblique, rectus capitis posterior minor and major, and levator
scapulae. First, the insertion of the sternocleidomastoid muscle is detached from the mastoid
Abramov I et al. 8
process and is retracted anteriorly. Care is taken to identify and preserve CN XI, which runs
below the sternocleidomastoid muscle (Figure 2C). As the dissection progresses, frequent
palpation of the C1 transverse process is recommended to understand the dissection planes. The
underlying superficial muscles and fascial layers are dissected to expose the suboccipital
triangle, which is composed of the rectus capitis posterior major muscle and the superior and
inferior oblique muscles (Figure 2D-F). Dissection of the muscles of the suboccipital triangle is
performed with elevation of the superior and inferior oblique muscles from the C1 transverse
f
oo
process and medial reflection of the rectus capitis posterior major muscle (Figures 2G and 2H).
After the suboccipital triangle is dissected, several structures come into view, including the V3
r
-p
segment of the vertebral artery (VA) surrounded by the venous plexus, also called the
re
“suboccipital cavernous sinus,” the internal jugular vein, and the C2 nerve root and ganglion
lP
(Figure 2H).14 The insertion of the posterior belly of the digastric muscle is dissected to expose
na
the digastric groove. The digastric branch of the facial nerve can be used as a reliable anatomical
landmark to avoid injury to the trunk of CN VII.15 Care is required during the detachment of the
ur
rectus capitis lateralis muscle. This small muscle can be used as a landmark to avoid damage to
Jo
the internal jugular vein, which exits the jugular foramen just medial to the muscle attachment
(Figure 2J). The VA and the surrounding venous sinus are mobilized in the transverse foramen of
the atlas, and the foramen is opened (Figure 2K) using the micro rongeurs. Once the tributaries
of the suboccipital cavernous sinus are transected, subperiosteal transposition of the VA can be
performed to expose the atlantooccipital joint and C1 lateral mass (Figures 2K and 2L).
The proximal trunks of the extracranial lower CNs can be identified in the carotid sheath
at the skull base according to their usual positions (Figure 3). CN XI is usually found at the
beginning of the musculocutaneous stage. It courses toward the sternocleidomastoid muscle and
Abramov I et al. 9
can be traced back into the carotid sheath. CN XII can be found before exposure of the
extracranial orifice of the hypoglossal canal and is identified by its relationship with the C1
nerve root, which runs along the carotid sheath, giving a branch to CN XII.16 CN IX is the most
medially located nerve coursing closest to the medial surface of the internal carotid artery. The
f
oo
A low retrosigmoid craniotomy is performed to open the foramen magnum (Video 2).
The lower extension of the craniotomy can be determined by the posterior condylar vein, a
r
-p
consistent anatomical landmark that guides an effective access to the lateral rim of the foramen
re
magnum.17 To prevent injury of the sigmoid sinus during the craniotomy, an imaginary line
lP
intersecting the digastric point (the most posterior point of the digastric groove) and posterior
na
condylar vein can be used to approximate the location of the sigmoid sinus. Drilling anterior to
this line may injure the sigmoid sinus (Figures 4A and 4B).18 The jugular process, a bony
ur
structure on the posteroinferior surface of the jugular foramen, is resected to expose the inferior-
Jo
posterior surface of the jugular bulb and the transition between the horizontal part of the sigmoid
sinus and the jugular bulb (Figure 4C). Resection of the mastoid tip may be required to enhance
Access to the extradural aspect of the anterior CVJ is gained after complete resection of
the occipital condyle and C1 lateral mass. The occipital condyle is drilled away, and the
hypoglossal canal is skeletonized (Figures 4D and 4E). Drilling below the hypoglossal canal via
the infrahypoglossal corridor allows extension of the resection to the mid- and lower clivus.19
Abramov I et al. 10
Additional resection of the ipsilateral regions of the clivus can be achieved via the transjugular
Next, the C1 lateral mass is carefully drilled away. Care must be taken to avoid damage
to the surrounding critical neurovascular structures. The articulate surface of the ipsilateral
condyle, the odontoid process, and the C1 anterior arch are then exposed (Figures 4F and 4G).
Subsequently, the articulate surface of the ipsilateral occipital condyle is completely resected,
with drilling via the infrahypoglossal corridor exposing the anterior rim of the foramen magnum
f
oo
and the lower clivus (Figure 4H).
The odontoid process and anterior arch of C1 are drilled away to create a surgical
r
-p
corridor to the contralateral regions of the anterior CVJ. Depending on the extent of the exposure
re
required, the entire odontoid process can be exposed and drilled, revealing the contralateral
lP
atlantooccipital joint and the regions of the lower clivus (Figure 4I). Drilling of the clivus
na
progresses mainly through the infrahypoglossal corridor and can be extended to the middle
clivus toward the contralateral paraclival internal carotid artery (Video 2). The transjugular
ur
tubercle corridor can be used to resect the diseased clivus adjacent to the ipsilateral petroclival
Jo
fissure.
If the lesion extends to the intradural space, the dura is incised to decompress the
brainstem. The ventrolateral brainstem and upper cervical spine can be sufficiently visualized
from the extreme lateral approach, with all the critical vascular structures adequately exposed for
Once the resection is complete, the dura is sutured back into position, and dural defects
are reconstructed with a fascial graft or artificial material. The extradural space is packed with an
autologous fat graft in combination with fibrin glue to achieve a watertight wound closure to
avoid the formation of a potential pseudomeningocele or cerebrospinal fluid leakage. After the
f
oo
A 22-year-old woman developed sudden-onset left-sided hearing loss and blurry vision
on both sides. The patient underwent endoscopic endonasal resection of a mass at an outside
r
-p
facility shortly after diagnosis. The pathology was consistent with a chordoma, and postoperative
re
radiation was recommended. The patient delayed her care for a few months, and new magnetic
lP
resonance imaging demonstrated recurrence and new growth (Figure 6). The mass extended
na
inferiorly into the prevertebral space, with narrowing of the nasopharynx, and into the foramen
magnum, with erosion of the superior aspect of the dens. The patient underwent a planned 2-
ur
transcondylar approach and C1 laminectomy to resect the lesion (Figure 6, Video 3).
imaging obtained after tumor resection demonstrated significant decompression of the anterior
CVJ, with postoperative changes (Figure 7). Eight days after her discharge from the hospital, the
demonstrated a 1.5 × 1.2 × 1.3-cm pseudoaneurysm of the left V3 segment of the vertebral artery
near the area where it had been transposed during the extreme lateral approach (Figure 7E). The
patient underwent sacrifice of the vertebral artery with coil embolization (Figure 7F). With no
Abramov I et al. 12
new neurological or vascular complications, the patient was discharged home. Adjuvant therapy
with a proton beam radiation, consisting of 33 fractions with 11 fractions boost for a total
DISCUSSION
Junction
f
oo
Microsurgery for treating lesions of the anterolateral CVJ has evolved gradually, with
great advancements made by many neurosurgeons from the 1970s through the 1990s. These
r
-p
surgeons refined the techniques and expanded the indications for skull base surgery. Among the
re
most significant surgical innovations has been the posterolateral retrocondylar approach for
lP
vertebrobasilar aneurysms, described by Heros20 in 1986. This approach, also regarded as the
na
traditional far lateral approach, was later modified by George et al21 in 1988 to include additional
transposition of the vertebral artery, partial mastoidectomy, and exposure of the sigmoid sinus
ur
for resection of intradural lesions of the anterior foramen magnum.20-22 Sen and Sekhar were the
Jo
first to describe resection of the posteromedial portion of the C1 lateral mass12 as well as partial
and complete condylectomy during the lateral approach to the CVJ junction.23 They named their
approach the “extreme lateral approach,” which was intended to minimize brainstem and
Since the original descriptions of a lateral approach to the anterior CVJ, many
microsurgical techniques using different levels of bone drilling have emerged for treating lesions
of the anterolateral CVJ. However, due to the number of authors classifying their approaches
with different terminology, the nomenclature associated with these approaches often overlaps
Abramov I et al. 13
and has become confusing, with terms such as transcondylar, far lateral transcondylar, far lateral
transatlas, extreme lateral transtubercular, extreme lateral transodontoid, and extreme far lateral
being used.7, 10, 11, 13, 22, 24 As a result, the far lateral transcondylar approach was occasionally used
to refer to the surgical technique originally described in the extreme lateral approach. The
extreme lateral approach was named using the terms of the anterolateral and transcondylar
f
oo
Categorizing the lateral skull base approaches to the anterior CVJ is based on the surgical
trajectory and location of the lesion. The common, broad terms to describe surgical trajectories
r
-p
are the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches.27 The main difference between the 2
re
techniques is related to the dissection of the musculocutaneous flap. In the posterolateral
lP
longissimus capitis muscles, with CN XI crossing the surgical field, resulting in a more anterior
ur
and lateral approach.27 Based on this concept, the traditional far lateral and extreme lateral
Jo
From the perspective of lateral skull base approaches, the microsurgical view of the
anterior CVJ is obstructed by bony structures, including the occipital condyle, the C1 lateral
mass, and the odontoid process. Therefore, depending on the extent of the lesion, access to both
the intra- and extradural compartments often necessitates different levels of bone drilling to
achieve the desired exposure. Although both surgical trajectories can expose the odontoid
process with different extents of drilling of the occipital condyle and C1 lateral mass, the
anterolateral approach offers the advantage of being in the anterior angle of attack.13, 27 However,
Abramov I et al. 14
the diversity of the terminology used to refer to these surgical trajectories makes direct
Access to extradural lesions of the odontoid process and contralateral CVJ was initially
introduced as part of the anterolateral approach.24, 27 Subsequently, Türe and Pamir11 proposed
the extreme lateral transatlas transodontoid approach for extradural lesions, similar to the
f
technique described by George and Lot27 and al-Mefty et al24, but through the posterolateral
oo
trajectory, further modified with additional bone drilling and acknowledged as the ELTOA.
r
-p
As described in the current study, the ELTOA involves a great extent of soft-tissue
re
dissection and bone drilling. In the demonstrated cadaveric dissection, the muscles were
lP
One of the key elements of the ELTOA is the transposition of the V3 segment of the VA.
Jo
Although available techniques allow for safe dissection and mobilization of the vessel, surgeons
must be aware of the intricate anatomical variability of the VA V3 segment in this region.21, 29-31
Bleeding from the muscular branch of the V3 segment of the VA can be confused with bleeding
from the extradural origin of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, which rarely originates from
the VA.32-34 Another source of bleeding during the transposition of the VA can be related to the
removal of the lateral mass of the atlas, dens, and clivus, providing great exposure of the
extradural anterior CVJ, contralateral atlantooccipital joint, and intradural space, including the
anterolateral medulla and the pons.37 Significant exposure afforded by the ELTOA also
eliminates retraction of the dural sac (containing the caudal medulla and upper spinal cord) at the
Access to the clivus is facilitated with a proper head position. Tilting the head downward
f
oo
and rotating it sufficiently to make the mastoid process the highest point in the field are the 2
essential maneuvers in patient positioning that contribute to satisfactory drilling of the lower and
r
-p
middle clivus (Figure 1). The downward tilt of the head widens the exposure of the CVJ and the
re
clivus, and rotation of the head takes the trajectory to the lower and middle clivus, preventing
lP
obstruction of the surgical view by the anteriorly located musculocutaneous tissue and internal
na
jugular vein (Figures 1 and 4E). The use of an endoscope with angulated lenses can significantly
enhance the resection of an extensive lesion, as it would aid in the drilling of the lower, middle,
ur
and even upper clivus.38 The only region of the clivus that is difficult to access is adjacent to the
Jo
which is related to the total or near-total removal of the atlantooccipital joint. Depending on the
performed using unilateral or bilateral fusion plates in a staged operation or during the same
When choosing the best possible surgical approach, skull base surgeons should be self-
complications. Despite its aggressiveness, the ELTOA in select patients remains unmatched in its
ability to deliver a desired outcome. The ELTOA has been described for the treatment of large,
anterolateral CVJ.7, 11, 40 In the clinical case presented here, the histopathological diagnosis was
f
oo
consistent with a chordoma. Following the initial surgical intervention, the patient postponed
adjuvant treatment, resulting in tumor recurrence. Chordomas are challenging tumors, with a
r
-p
local recurrence rate ranging from 32% to 72% at 5 years, and a prompt staged or combined
re
resection is sometimes mandatory to achieve gross total resection.41
lP
At the readmission of the case described, the lesion predominantly arose in the midline
na
with inferior-lateral extension into the prevertebral space and odontoid process. Midline lesions
with a lateral extension or extension beyond the nasopalatine line may be challenging to
ur
approach from the anterior trajectory via the endoscopic endonasal technique.6, 42 Therefore, the
Jo
anatomical comparison of the lateral skull base approaches to the endoscopic endonasal
techniques showed that in this patient, the combination of these 2 techniques could compensate
for their inherent limitations.37, 43 Considering the location of the pathologic process, the
significant exposure provided by the ELTOA can be applied for patients with anterior CVJ
lesions extending beyond the midline to the upper cervical spine, and especially for patients with
preexisting CVJ instability, as the pathologic process already invades the atlantooccipital
junction.
Abramov I et al. 17
However, the advantage of significant exposure of the anterior CVJ is obscured by the
risk of injury to the lower CNs. Although it is transient in most cases, the reported incidence of
the lower CN deficit following the extreme lateral approaches ranges between 17.9% and 50%,
with CN XII being the most commonly injured nerve.40 In rare cases, manipulation of the
clinical case (Figure 7).44, 45 The natural course of such pseudoaneurysms is not well defined, and
the underlying mechanism is due to the penetrating or blunt trauma of the vessel wall during
f
surgery.44 The cause of pseudoaneurysm formation in our patient is unclear, as no signs of vessel
oo
injury occurred intraoperatively. The usual subperiosteal dissection technique of the VA was
r
-p
used, which preserves the periosteal sheath protecting the VA, followed by gentle transposition.
re
The patient experienced delayed hemorrhage after discharge on postoperative day 8. It can be
lP
speculated that blunt trauma to the VA, which can appear during the resection of the C1
na
transverse process and retraction of the vessel, and subsequent rise in the arterial blood pressure
in the postoperative period, could have contributed to pseudoaneurysm formation and bleeding.
ur
A systematic review found that of 144 cases of injuries to the VA, 22 resulted in
Jo
on lesion size, location, and the dominance of the VA, with endovascular treatment being an
CONCLUSIONS
exceptional clinical experience are essential for managing patients with complex skull base
tumors. The ELTOA is a useful approach to the treatment of challenging extradural lesions that
Abramov I et al. 18
arise at the lower skull base, offering access to the anterior CVJ and increasing the likelihood of
gross total tumor removal. However, given the complexity of the approach, substantial training
in the dissection laboratory is required to develop the necessary anatomical knowledge and
f
r oo
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
Abramov I et al. 19
REFERENCES
3. Budohoski KP, Barone DG, Mediratta S, Ross MI, Kirollos RW, Santarius T, Trivedi RA. Far
f
oo
Operative Video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). Jan 1 2022;22(1):e48.
r
-p
quantifying the skull-base invasion by petroclival meningiomas: a review of 66 cases.
re
Acta Neurochir (Wien). Jun 2014;156(6):1085-1097.
lP
6. Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Henry SL, Stefko ST, Kassam AB, Fernandez-
Jo
Miranda JC, Snyderman CH. Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of cranial
discussion 624-615.
7. Donoho DA, Bauer DF, Whitehead WE, Aldave G. Bilateral Extreme Far Lateral
2022;22(6):e271-e272.
Abramov I et al. 20
8. Alzhrani G, Gozal YM, Eli I, Sivakumar W, Raheja A, Brockmeyer DL, Couldwell WT.
9. Joyce EJ, Cohen MA, Ho W, Brockmeyer DL, Couldwell WT. Extreme Lateral Transodontoid
10. Salas E, Sekhar LN, Ziyal IM, Caputy AJ, Wright DC. Variations of the extreme-lateral
f
oo
craniocervical approach: anatomical study and clinical analysis of 69 patients. J
r
-p
11. Ture U, Pamir MN. Extreme lateral-transatlas approach for resection of the dens of the axis.
re
J Neurosurg. Jan 2002;96(1 Suppl):73-82.
lP
12. Sen CN, Sekhar LN. An extreme lateral approach to intradural lesions of the cervical spine
na
13. Kawashima M, Tanriover N, Rhoton AL, Jr., Ulm AJ, Matsushima T. Comparison of the far
ur
14. Arnautovic KI, al-Mefty O, Pait TG, Krisht AF, Husain MM. The suboccipital cavernous
15. Tayebi Meybodi A, Borba Moreira L, Lawton MT, Preul MC. Anatomical assessment of the
digastric branch of the facial nerve as a landmark to localize the extratemporal facial
16. Iwanaga J, Fisahn C, Alonso F, DiLorenzo D, Grunert P, Kline MT, Watanabe K, Oskouian
RJ, Spinner RJ, Tubbs RS. Microsurgical Anatomy of the Hypoglossal and C1 Nerves:
f
oo
Study. World Neurosurg. Feb 2022;158:174-179.
18. Matsuo S, Komune N, Kurogi R, Akagi Y, Iihara K. Relationship Between the Horizontal
r
-p
Part of the Sigmoid Sinus and the Line Through the Digastric Point and Posterior Edge of
re
the Condyle: An Anatomic and Radiologic Study. World Neurosurg. Jun 2018;114:e597-
lP
e604.
na
19. Di Carlo DT, Voormolen EH, Passeri T, Champagne PO, Penet N, Bernat AL, Froelich S.
20. Heros RC. Lateral suboccipital approach for vertebral and vertebrobasilar artery lesions. J
21. George B, Dematons C, Cophignon J. Lateral approach to the anterior portion of the foramen
22. Bambakidis NC, Dickman CA. Surgery of the craniovertebral junction: Thieme; 2012.
23. Sen CN, Sekhar LN. Surgical management of anteriorly placed lesions at the craniocervical
24. al-Mefty O, Borba LA, Aoki N, Angtuaco E, Pait TG. The transcondylar approach to
1996;84(1):1-6.
25. Dowd GC, Zeiller S, Awasthi D. Far lateral transcondylar approach: dimensional anatomy.
26. Nakov V, Spiriev T, Stavrev E. How I do it: surgical clipping of vertebrobasilar junction
f
oo
2018;160(6):1149-1153.
27. George B, Lot G. Anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the foramen magnum:
r
-p
technical description and experience from 97 cases. Skull Base Surg. 1995;5(1):9-19.
re
28. Quinones-Hinojosa A. Schmidek and Sweet: Operative Neurosurgical Techniques E-Book:
lP
Indications, Methods and Results (Expert Consult-Online and Print): Elsevier Health
na
Sciences; 2012.
29. Park HH, Lee KS, Hong CK. Vertebral Artery Transposition Via an Extreme-Lateral
ur
30. Wanibuchi M, Fukushima T, Zenga F, Friedman AH. Simple identification of the third
31. Ulm AJ, Quiroga M, Russo A, Russo VM, Graziano F, Velasquez A, Albanese E. Normal
32. Abd el-Bary TH, Dujovny M, Ausman JI. Microsurgical anatomy of the atlantal part of the
33. de Oliveira E, Rhoton AL, Jr., Peace D. Microsurgical anatomy of the region of the foramen
f
oo
35. Kondo A, Koyama T, Ishikawa J, Yamasaki T. Occipito-vertebral anastomosis; its clinical
r
-p
36. Harada J, Kuwayama N, Nishijima M, Okamoto S, Kubo M, Endo S. Symptomatic occipital-
re
vertebral anastomosis - a case report. Interv Neuroradiol. Dec 22 2000;6(4):317-320.
lP
37. Abramov I, Labib MA, Houlihan LM, Loymak T, Srinivasan VM, Preul MC, Lawton MT.
na
38. Tardivo V, Labidi M, Passeri T, Bernat AL, Zenga F, Voormolen E, Penet N, Froelich S.
From the Occipital Condyle to the Sphenoid Sinus: Extradural Extension of the Far
2020;134:e771-e782.
40. Alshafai NS, Klepinowski T. Extreme Lateral Approach to the Craniovertebral Junction: An
41. Amichetti M, Cianchetti M, Amelio D, Enrici RM, Minniti G. Proton therapy in chordoma of
the base of the skull: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. Oct 2009;32(4):403-416.
42. de Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA,
Kassam AB. Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine.
f
oo
43. Benet A, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, Rincon-Torroella J, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Prats-
Galino A, Kassam AB. Comparative analysis of the transcranial "far lateral" and
r
-p
endoscopic endonasal "far medial" approaches: surgical anatomy and clinical illustration.
re
World Neurosurg. Feb 2014;81(2):385-396.
lP
44. Schittek A. Pseudoaneurysm of the vertebral artery. Tex Heart Inst J. 1999;26(1):90-95.
na
Fusion Surgery: Case Report and Literature Review. Orthop Surg. Oct
Jo
2022;14(10):2788-2795.
Abramov I et al. 25
FIGURE LEGENDS
Figure 1. Patient positioning. (A) A roll is placed under the side of the chest contralateral to the
lesion, the contralateral arm is placed on an arm support, and the ipsilateral arm is secured along
the thorax. (B) Exposure of the anterolateral craniovertebral junction (green area) can be
obstructed by the mastoid process in the lateral head position. (C) The surgical corridor can be
widened further by tilting the head downward. (D) Additional head rotation to the contralateral
shoulder affords a better surgical trajectory to the lower and middle clivus, avoiding obstruction
f
oo
of the surgical view by the anteriorly located musculocutaneous tissue. Red dashed curved lines
indicate the skin incision. Inset represents the head position. Red arrows indicate the surgical
r
-p
corridor. Blue dashed region represents the mastoid process. Blue plane represents the
re
musculocutaneous layer at the anterior edge of the surgical opening. Used with permission from
lP
Light blue shading represents the musculocutaneous tissue layer, which is being manipulated or
ur
dissected. (A) Relevant surface anatomical landmarks for the planning of the skin incision. (B)
Jo
After inferior reflection of the skin flap, the first superficial muscles, the sternocleidomastoid and
splenius, are exposed. Pink shading shows the projection of the mastoid process and C1
transverse process, which should be palpated during dissection. (C) The sternocleidomastoid
muscle is incised and reflected anteriorly. (D) Dissection and retraction of the splenius muscle
from the mastoid process expose the next muscular layers, including the levator scapulae,
longissimus capitis, and semispinalis capitis muscles. (E) After the levator scapulae and
longissimus capitis muscles are dissected, the superior oblique and inferior oblique muscles
come into view. (F) Retraction of the semispinalis capitis muscle exposes the suboccipital
Abramov I et al. 26
triangle, which comprises the rectus capitis posterior major muscle and superior and inferior
oblique muscles. (G) The insertion of the superior oblique muscle is divided from the transverse
process of the atlas. (H) The suboccipital triangle is completely opened after the inferior oblique
muscles are elevated from the transverse process of the atlas and reflect the rectus capitis major
muscle inferomedially. (I) Detachment of the digastric muscle exposes the internal jugular vein
and the insertion of the rectus capitis lateralis muscle at the jugular process (yellow dashed
outline). The facial nerve can be reliably identified by the digastric branch of the facial nerve
f
oo
coursing toward the main trunk. (J) The rostral and caudal attachments of the rectus capitis
lateralis muscle are carefully detached from the jugular process (yellow dashed outline) and C1
r
-p
transverse process, respectfully, to expose the most rostral part of the internal jugular vein
re
exiting the jugular foramen and lateral condylar vein. (K) The vertebral artery and the
lP
surrounding venous plexus are identified and mobilized in the transverse foramen of the atlas.
na
The transverse foramen of the atlas is opened. Transposition of the vertebral artery (white dashed
outline) can be safely performed medially and inferiorly after transection of the lateral and
ur
posterior condylar veins (black dashed lines). (L) The vertebral artery is transposed and retracted
Jo
posteriorly to expose the atlantooccipital joint and the C1 lateral mass. The black dashed circle
represents caudal cranial nerves exposed in the exposed carotid sheath. Abbreviations: AM,
angle of the mandible; MP, mastoid process; Sup., superior; SCM, sternocleidomastoid muscle;
Splen. cap. m., splenius capitis muscle; a., artery; Levator scap. m., levator scapulae muscle; CN,
cranial nerve; Inf. oblique m., inferior oblique muscle; Sup. oblique m., superior oblique muscle;
Rectus cap. post. maj., rectus capitis posterior major; IJV, internal jugular vein; Digastric m.,
digastric muscle; Suboc. cav. sinus, suboccipital cavernous sinus; IJV, internal jugular vein; rec.
cap. lat. m., rectus capitis lateralis muscle; PG, parotid gland; L. cond. v., lateral condylar vein;
Abramov I et al. 27
P. cond. v., posterior condylar vein; VA, vertebral artery; V3, V3 segment of the vertebral artery.
Figure 3. The rostral carotid sheath is exposed at the skull base, and the relationship of the lower
CNs is depicted. CN XII can be identified by the branch of the C1 nerve root running in a close
adjacency to the former. CN IX is usually the most medially located nerve. Abbreviations: CN,
cranial nerve; ICA, internal carotid artery; IJV, internal jugular vein; VA, vertebral artery. Used
f
oo
Figure 4. Continuation of stepwise cadaveric dissection illustrating the left-sided extreme lateral
transodontoid approach. (A) The bony resection stage begins with identifying the C1 lateral
r
-p
mass, occipital condyle, jugular process (yellow dashed outlines), and digastric point located on
re
the posterior margin of the digastric groove (green dashed outline). A digastric-condylar (red
lP
dashed) line connecting the digastric point and posterior condylar vein is used to estimate the
na
position of the sigmoid sinus and prevent the injury of the latter during retrosigmoid craniotomy.
(B) A low retrosigmoid craniotomy is performed, and the lip of the foramen is unroofed. (C) The
ur
jugular process is drilled to expose the jugular bulb and its transition with the horizontal part of
Jo
the sigmoid sinus. (D) The hypoglossal canal is skeletonized after drilling of the occipital
condyle. Subsequent access to the mid- and lower clivus can be achieved through 2 surgical
corridors: the infrahypoglossal corridor, limited superiorly by the hypoglossal canal (red arrow),
and the transjugular tubercle corridor, a narrow corridor between the hypoglossal canal and
jugular bulb (yellow arrow). (E) Drilling has progressed via the infrahypoglossal (red arrow) and
transjugular tubercle (yellow arrow) corridors. The jugular tubercle and the lower clivus are
exposed. (F) The C1 lateral mass (green highlight) is drilled through to show the relationship of
the underlying bony structures. The odontoid process is projecting at the deeper dissection level
Abramov I et al. 28
compared with the articulate surface of the occipital condyle. (G) A lateral view from the
extreme lateral approach. The C1 lateral mass has been completely drilled away, exposing the
articulate surface of the ipsilateral occipital condyle, the upper lateral spinal epidural space
(yellow dashed outline), the anterior arch of the C1 vertebra, and the odontoid process. (H) A
more lateral and caudal cranial view from the extreme lateral approach. After the complete
ipsilateral condylectomy, the extradural aspect of the anterior craniocervical junction is exposed
(yellow and white dashed outline). (I) Surgical view of the extradural anterior craniocervical
f
oo
junction after the complete ipsilateral condylectomy and odontoidectomy via the extreme lateral
approach. The contralateral atlantooccipital joint (yellow dashed circle) was exposed after
r
-p
resection of the odontoid process. Abbreviations: C1 lat. mass, C1 lateral mass; Occip. cond,
re
occipital condyle; Jug. proc., jugular process; Dig. groove, digastric groove; P. cond. v., posterior
lP
condylar vein; VA, vertebral artery; L. cond. v., lateral condylar vein; ICA, internal carotid
na
artery; JT, jugular tubercle; OP, odontoid process; Rec. cap. ant., rectus capitis anterior muscle;
C2 art. surf, C2 articulate surface; For. magnum rim, foramen magnum rim. Used with
ur
Figure 5. (A) The intradural view to the surface of the brainstem and surrounding neurovascular
structures after the extreme lateral transodontoid approach with complete condylectomy and
lower and middle clivus drilling. (B) A more caudal cranial view through the approach allows
visualization of the vertebrobasilar junction, contralateral vertebral artery, basilar artery, and
ipsilateral pons. Abbreviations: ICA, internal carotid artery; cAOj, contralateral atlantooccipital
junction; V3, V3 segment of the vertebral artery; V4, V4 segment of the vertebral artery; PICA,
posterior inferior cerebellar artery; Dent. l., dentate ligament; cV4, contralateral V4 segment of
Abramov I et al. 29
the vertebral artery; BA, basilar artery; AICA, anterior inferior cerebellar artery. Used with
centered in the left paramedian clivus on T1 axial (A and B) and sagittal (C) planes, measuring
approximately 3.3 x 3.2 x 5.7 cm (ML x AP x CC), with T2 isointensity evident on the coronal
plane (D). The lesion caused a significant mass effect upon the brainstem, displacing it
posteriorly with effacement of the fourth ventricle and without evidence of obstructing
f
oo
hydrocephalus. (E) Intraoperative photo of the left-sided extreme lateral transodontoid approach.
A low retrosigmoid craniotomy and transposition of the V3 segment of the vertebral artery are
r
-p
completed. (F) The lateral atlantooccipital junction (teal dashed area) is exposed. (G) The left
re
hypoglossal canal is skeletonized. The drilling below and above the hypoglossal canal develops
lP
the infrahypoglossal (red arrow) and transjugular tubercle (yellow arrow) corridors. (H) The C1
na
lateral mass and complete condlyectomy have been performed, followed by exposure of the left
hypoglossal nerve in the hypoglossal canal. The lesion is resected via the 2 aforementioned
ur
surgical corridors (red and yellow arrows), and the nerve is gently retracted caudally or rostrally
Jo
AP, anteroposterior; CC, craniocaudal; V3, V3 segment of the vertebral artery; MP, mastoid
process; C1 lat. mass, C1 lateral mass; Occip. cond, occipital condyle; C2 art. surf, C2 articulate
surface. Used with permission from University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami,
Florida.
Figure 7. Magnetic resonance imaging after resection of the patient’s chordoma demonstrated
decompression of the anterior craniovertebral junction and postoperative changes in axial (A),
coronal (B), and sagittal (C) planes. (D) Computed tomography shows occipital bone-to-C3
Abramov I et al. 30
vertebral fusion. (E) Computed tomography angiography shows a large left vertebral artery
pseudoaneurysm. (F) The left vertebral artery pseudoaneurysm was successfully treated by coil
embolization with no new neurological deficit. Used with permission from University of Miami
f
r oo
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
Abramov I et al. 31
VIDEO LEGENDS
musculocutaneous stage. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix,
Arizona.
craniotomy, clivus drilling, and odontoidectomy. Used with permission from Barrow
f
oo
Video 3. Clinical case example demonstrating left-sided extreme lateral transodontoid approach
for resection of the chordoma at the anterior craniovertebral junction. Used with permission from
r
Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
roo
f
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
roo
f
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
roo
f
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
roo
f
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
roo
f
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
roo
f
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
roo
f
ABBREVIATIONS: CN, cranial nerve; CVJ, craniovertebral junction; ELTOA, extreme lateral
f
r oo
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
DISCLOSURES: The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the
FINANCIAL SUPPORT: This study was supported by funds from the Newsome Chair in
Neurosurgery Research held by Dr. Preul and by the Barrow Neurological Foundation.
f
r oo
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo