Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sotero 07 Task Performance 1 Inventory
Sotero 07 Task Performance 1 Inventory
Sotero 07 Task Performance 1 Inventory
BSBA
Task Performance
a. Compute the total inventory costs for the current situation where Ismail is following a Lot-
for-Lot ordering policy to order training materials;
Iteration 2
Next, place an order for 12 attendees at the beginning of February that will completely meet the
demand for that month.
Next, place an order for 16 attendees at the beginning of March that will completely meet the
demand for that month.
Iteration 4
Next, place an order for 19 attendees at the beginning of April that will completely meet the
demand for that month.
Iteration 5
Next, place an order for 60 units at the beginning of February that will completely meet the
demand for that month.
Iteration 6
Next, place an order for 60 units at the beginning of February that will completely meet the
demand for that month.
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
Using the same technique, the total inventory costs, assuming that an order is placed at the beginning of
each month, would completely satisfy the demand for that month. Thus, if the lot-for-lot method would be
used, the total inventory cost would be $481.25.
Month Ordering Cost Holding Cost Total Cost
January $60 $22.50 $82.50
February $60 $15 $75
March $60 $20 $80
April $60 $23.75 $83.75
May $60 $26.25 $86.25
June $60 $13.75 $73.75
Total $360 $121.25 $481.25
b. Compute the total inventory costs if you were to use the Part-Period Balancing Heuristics;
Iteration 1.1
Start the solution process by placing an order for 18 attendees in January.
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
In this case, the holding cost ($22.50) is less than the order cost ($60). Therefore, the next step would be
to set the order horizon to 2 months – January and February – and place one order at the beginning of
January that would meet the requirements for both January and February.
Iteration 1.2
The expected attendees for January is18 attendees, and that for February is 12 attendees. If an
order of 30 attendees were placed at the beginning of January, the following costs would be
incurred:
Cost incurred for January and February
Type of Cost Description
Ordering Cost Since the order is placed, we incur an ordering cost of $60
Holding Cost Assuming the ordered quantity of 30 attendees would be received in full at the
beginning of January, the inventory level at the beginning of January is 30
attendees. The inventory level at the end of January is 12 attendees. So, the
average inventory level in January would be
= 30 + 12
2
= 21 attendees
The inventory level at the beginning of February would be 12 attendees, and at
the end of February would be 0.
So, the average inventory level in February would be
= 12 + 0
2
= 6 attendees
The total holding cost for the months of January and February would, therefore,
be:
= (21 + 6) × $2.5 = $67.50
At this point, the holding cost ($67.50) has exceeded the cost of placing one order ($60). Calculate the 𝐶𝑟
values:
For Iteration 1.1, the holding cost for ordering 18 attendees in January is $22.5 Thus, 𝐶𝑟 would be
As seen from the closeness factor Table of January-February, 𝐶𝑟 for the lot size of 18 attendees is smaller
for the two (2) order horizons – January and February (or the total holding cost is closer to the ordering
cost). Therefore, conclude that it is economical to place an order for 18 attendees in January, which will
help meet the demand for January alone.
Iteration 2.1
The holding cost (P9) is less than the order cost (40). Therefore, the next step is to set an order horizon to
2 months – March and April – and place one order at the beginning of March, which would meet the
requirements for both these months.
Iteration 2.2
Since the total holding cost has exceeded the order cost, check the 𝐶𝑟 values:
For Iteration 2.1, the holding cost for ordering 16 attendees in March is $20. Thus, 𝐶𝑟 would be
𝐶𝑟 = |$60 - $20| = $40
For Iteration 2.2, the holding cost for ordering 35 attendees in March is $87.50. Thus,
𝐶𝑟 = |$60 - $87.50| = $27.50
As seen from above, the 𝐶𝑟 for the lot size of 35 attendees is smaller (meaning, the holding cost is closer
to the ordering cost); thus, it is economical to place an order for 35 attendees in March, which will help
meet the demand for March only.
Iteration 3.1
The holding cost ($26.25) is less than the order cost ($60). Therefore, the next step is to set an order
horizon to 2 months –May and June– and place one order at the beginning of May, which would meet the
requirements for both these months
Iteration 3.2
Since the total holding cost has exceeded the order cost, check the 𝐶𝑟 values:
For Iteration 3.1, the holding cost for ordering 21 attendees in May is $26.25. Thus, 𝐶𝑟 would be
𝐶𝑟 = |$60 − $26.25| = $33.75
For Iteration 3.2, the holding cost for ordering 32 attendees in May is $80. Thus,
𝐶𝑟 = |$60 − $80| = $20
As seen from above, the 𝐶𝑟 for the lot size of 32 attendees is smaller (meaning, the holding cost is closer
to the ordering cost); thus, it is economical to place an order for 50 attendees in May, which will help
meet the demand for May and June.
The solution produced by the part-period balancing method suggests that orders placed in January should
be 18 attendees, in March should be 16 attendees, and in May should be 21 attendees. The total inventory
cost for the planning horizon is 319.50.
c. Compute the total inventory costs if you were to use the Silver-Meal Heuristics;
Iteration 1.1
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
Iteration 1.2
The next step would be to set an order horizon to 2 months – January and February – and place
one order at the beginning of January that would meet the requirements for both these months.
At this stage, the PPC for order horizon January - February is lower than the PPC for January. Therefore,
continue batching demands. Next, set the order horizon to January-February-March, with the order being
received at the beginning of January.
Iteration 1.3
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
At this stage, the PPC for order horizon January, February, and March is greater than the PPC for
January-February. Based on the Silver-Meal heuristic, conclude that it is optimal to place one order of 30
attendees at the beginning of January. Next, set the order horizon to March with the order being received
at the beginning of March.
Iteration 2.1
Start the next iteration by setting the start period to March. The total demand for March is 85 units.
Iteration 2.2
Take an order horizon of 2 months – March and April.
The PPC for the order horizon of March-April is greater than the PPC for March. Therefore, the optimal
order quantity is demand for March alone (16 attendees).
Iteration 3.1
At this stage, the PPC for order horizon April - May is lower than the PPC for April. Therefore, continue
batching demands. Next, set the order horizon to April – May - June, with the order being received at the
beginning of April.
Iteration 3.3
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
At this stage, the PPC for order horizon April – May – June is lower than the PPC for April - May.
Therefore, the optimal order quantity is the demand for April alone (19 Attendees).
Iteration 4.1
Start the new iteration after setting the starting period to June. The demand for June is 11 attendees. Since
the demands for the next months are unknown, stop the lot-sizing procedure. Then, assume that it is
economical to place an order for 11 attendees at the beginning of June.
d. Compute the total inventory costs if you were to use the Least Unit Cost Heuristics;
Iteration 1.1
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
Iteration 1.2
The next step would be to set an order horizon to two (2) months – January and February – and place
one order at the beginning of January that would meet the requirements for both these months.
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
Since the per-unit cost (PUC) for the order horizon of January and February took together is less than the
PUC for the order horizon for January alone, continue this iteration by combining the demand for
January, February, and March in one order, placed at the beginning of January.
Iteration 1.3
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
The PUC for order horizon January-February-March is greater than the PUC for the two-period order
horizon of January-February. Therefore, the optimal order quantity is the sum of the order quantities for
January and February, which is 30 attendees.
Iteration 2.1
Set the order horizon to March because the demand for March was not included in the previous order.
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
Iteration 2.2
Next, set the order horizon to two (2) periods – March and April.
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
Since the per-unit cost (PUC) for the order horizon of March and April took together is less than the PUC
for the order horizon for March alone, continue this iteration by combining the demand for March, April,
and May in one order, placed at the beginning of March.
Iteration 2.3
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
The PUC for order horizon March – April - May is greater than the PUC for the two-period order horizon
of March - April. Therefore, the optimal order quantity is the sum of the order quantities for March and
April which is 35 attendees.
Iteration 3.1
Set the order horizon to May because the demand for May was not included in the previous order.
Month January February March April May June
Expected attendees 18 12 16 19 21 11
Iteration 3.2
Next, set the order horizon to two (2) periods – May and June
Since the per-unit cost (PUC) for the order horizon of May and June took together is less than the PUC
for the order horizon for May alone, stop the solution process here. The least unit cost-based solution
summary table below suggests placing an order for 30 attendees in January, 35 attendees in March, 21
attendees in May.
Month Order Quantity Ordering Cost Holding Cost Total Cost
January 30 $60 $52.5 $112.50
February
March 35 $60 $91.25 $151.25
April
May 21 $60 $67.5 $127.5
June
TC $180 $211.25 $391.25