Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Behavior Change Model TTM
Behavior Change Model TTM
Student’s Name
Course
Instructor
Date
2
integrated cognitive paradigm founded on empirical evidence for comprehending and promoting
behavior change. The TTM is based on a variety of cognitive concepts concerning changing
behavior and particular processes that might help with transformation. This framework,
established in the late 1970s by Prochaska and DiClemente, is intended to explain and ease the
procedures of behavior modification by recognizing multiple phases that persons undergo while
changing their behavior (Moreira et al., 2020; Abrash Walton et al., 2022). The TTM is divided
into five distinct phases. The first stage, Precontemplation, is characterized by indifference or
hostility toward transformation. In Contemplation acknowledges but does not completely engage
on change. The Preparation stage represents preparing for change, whereas the Action stage
habits in order to avoid relapse (Moreira et al., 2020; Abrash Walton et al., 2022). The TTM aids
change. It acknowledges that individual capacity to change varies, and treatments ought to be
tailored appropriately. For example, learning programs in the Precontemplation phase could
concentrate on promoting understanding of the necessity for change and dealing with
connected with one's activities, which leads to lacking of inspiration to change (Shimazaki et al.,
2022). Furthermore, societal influences from friends and relatives who follow harmful guidelines
3
might make it difficult to become free from previous habits. Finally, the dread of failure hangs
enormously - worries concerning continuing fresh habits or the chance of relapsing might
discourage people from even trying to change (Ragelienė & Grønhøj, 2020; DiClemente &
Crisafulli, 2022). The preparedness of a patient to absorb information or change has a substantial
phase of transformation in which they are responsive and determined. Individuals who are in the
preparation, action, or maintenance phases, for example, are more receptive to learning about
and acquiring abilities linked to behavioral change (Sleet & Dellinger, 2020).
4
References
Abrash Walton, A., Nageotte, N. L., Heimlich, J. E., & Threadgill, A. V. (2022). Facilitating
conservation psychology framework and tool for practitioners. Zoo biology, 41(5), 386–
397. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21704
DiClemente, C. C., & Crisafulli, M. A. (2022). Relapse on the road to recovery: Learning the
lessons of failure on the way to successful behavior change. Journal of Health Service
Hashemzadeh, M., Rahimi, A., Zare-Farashbandi, F., Alavi-Naeini, A. M., & Daei, A. (2019).
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_94_17
Moreira, P. A. S., Faria, V., Cunha, D., Inman, R. A., & Rocha, M. (2020). Applying the
approach: A latent cluster analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 78, 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101818
Ragelienė, T., & Grønhøj, A. (2020). Preadolescents’ healthy eating behavior: peeping through
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09366-1
Shimazaki, T., Okoshi, H., Yamauchi, T., Takenaka, K., & Suka, M. (2022). The process of
behavioral change in individuals who are uninterested in health: a qualitative study based
5
11. https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.22-00072
Sleet, D. A., & Dellinger, A. M. (2020). Using behavioral science theory to enhance public
https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12795