Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agriculture Science S.B.A
Agriculture Science S.B.A
Student Registration #:
Name of School: El Dorado West Secondary School
Title of Project: Determining the performance of different broiler under
the same production system.
Project Start Date: 24th of April 2023.
Project End Date: 8th of June 2023.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page #
Introduction 2-3
Experimental Design 5
Results 8-13
Discussion 14
Conclusion 14
Limitation 14
Recommendation/s 14
1
INTRODUCTION
DISCUSSION
A broiler is any chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) that is bred and raised
specifically for the purpose of meat production. Some breeds of commercial
broilers reach slaughter weight as early as 4-6 weeks old. A typical characteristic
of broiler chickens is the fact that their feathers and skin are white.
Some Common breeds of broilers:
✓ Ross
✓ Hubbard
✓ Cobb 500
✓ Hy-line
Broiler Nutrition
Broilers are fed a commercial ration offered for sale on the open market.
At age 0-4 weeks chick are fed broiler starter. Broiler starter feed smaller granules
to help chicks digest their food more efficiently. Starter feed is typically higher in
protein 18% to 22% crude protein. Anything lower or significant higher in protein
content is inappropriate for use as a chick starter feed. Protein at this stage helps
chicks to improve rapid growth, increase their natural immunity to survive,
simulate gut development, and increase the nutrient absorption rate.
In the 4th week, Broiler Finisher Pellets are introduced to the birds. Finisher feed
is lower in protein and higher in energy. It can be used to increase the fat content
of the meat. This well-balanced diet is formulated to feed broiler chickens at the
finishing stage. The pellets are processed into 4mm into soft fresh and compact
particles that allow birds to eat less feed and gain more weight within a short
period.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Which broiler breed (Ross 308/Hubbard) will gain the most weight in a six-week
period?
2
HYPOTHESIS
Hubbard will gain the most weight at the end of the six-week period.
AIM
To conduct an investigation to observe the weight gain on the broiler breeds Ross
308 vs Hubbard using the same feed.
3
TOOLS AND MATERIALS
Tools Materials
Waterers (Automatic/Manual) Sawdust
Knife Wood shavings
Feeders Disinfectant
Scale Newspaper/Paper
Boots Broiler Feed (Starter)
Shovel Broiler Feed (Finisher)
Scale Clean Water
Electric Fan
Bucket
Clipboard
Watering Can
4
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
This experiment was conducted in a poultry house at El Dorado West Secondary
School on the 24th of April to the 8th of June 2023.
Thirty-two (32), day-old broiler chicks (17. Ross,15. Hubbard) were brought into
the school and rear in a brooder for 2 weeks. After brooding, the birds were
separated into 2 sections. Section 1 ‘the control’ and Section 2 ‘the treatment’
section. Hubbard were placed in Section 1 (control), while Ross was placed in
Section 2 (treatment). Both Sections were sanitized and both groups were given
feed and water daily. Both groups were observed for six-weeks until slaughter.
5
PRODUCTION PRACTICES
PEN SANITATION
Before the arrival of the chicks, the pen was dusted, swept and sanitated. The pen
was sanitated using water and disinfectant.
BROODER PREPARATION
The pen in which the chicks were reared in was made with concrete blocks on the
outside and using deep litter system consisted of wood shavings. Lights were
provided to enable the birds to feed continuously at night and to provide heat.
Due to the time the experiment was conducted during the warmer part of the year,
fans were provided.
SEPARATION OF CHICKS
At week three, the chicks were separated using a barrier, spitting the pen into two
sections, Treatment group (Ross) and Control group (Hubbard)
WEEKLY WEIGHING
The chickens were weighed on a scale weekly. The weights were recorded.
FEEDING MANAGEMENT
The chicks were fed broiler starter daily for four weeks. There were cautiously
introduced to broiler finished by mixing it with starter feed in increasing amounts.
The chickens were given water via plastic waterers for the first two weeks. They
were washed refilled with clean water daily. At week three, the chickens were
introduced to automatic waterers. These waterers were sanitized daily.
6
LITTER MANAGEMENT
The litter was turned regularly using a rake picked up with a shovel; All raked or
wet litter was removed and replaced with clean wood shavings.
SLAUGHTER
The birds were sent to the Poultry Depot.
SALE OF BIRDS
The birds were sold at the end of 6 weeks dressed birds $16.00 per Ib.
7
RESULTS
Table 1 shows that (control group) Hubbard has a high survival rate than
(treatment group) Ross.
8
Table 2 shows: Average Feed Consumption
Age (Weeks) Broiler Breed
Control-Hubbard Treatment-Ross
2 3.65 4.83
3 7.5 6.6
4 11.3 6.5
5 11.3 11.8
6 15.71 14.9
Table 2 shows the average feed consumption of the both breeds during the six-
week period. It also shows that Hubbard consumed more than Ross.
10
7.5
8 6.6 6.5
6 4.83
3.65
4
0
Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6
9
Total Feed Consumption per Group (Kg)
50 49.46
49
48
47
46
45 44.63
44
43
42
Control-Hubbard Treatment-Ross
Figure 2 showing the total amount of feed consumed per group. Control group
(Hubbard) consumed more feed than Treatment group (Ross).
10
Table 3 shows: Average Weight Gain (Per Bird)
Age (Weeks) Broiler Breed
Control-Hubbard Treatment-Ross
2 5.8 4.9
3 11.5 7.5
4 17.1 25.8
5 26.8 30.9
6 34.8 30.9
Table 3 shows the average weight gain of both breeds during the six-week period.
It also shows that treatment group (Ross) stopped gaining weight at the fifth
week.
20 17.1
15
11.5
10 7.5
5.8 4.9
5
0
Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6
Control-Hubbard Treatment-Ross
Figure 6 shows the weight gain of both groups (Ross, Hubbard) during the six-
week period. It also shows that treatment group (Ross) stopped growing at the
fifth week.
11
Graph Showing: Total Amount of Live Weight Gain
101
100
100
99
98
97
96
96
95
94
Control-Hubbard Treatment-Ross
Figure 7 shows the total number of live weights gained by both groups (Hubbard,
Ross) during the experiment. It also shows that treatment group (Ross) gained
more weight than control group (Hubbard).
12
Table 4 shows: Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR)
Age (Weeks) Broiler Breed
Control-Hubbard Treatment-Ross
2 1.6:1 1:1
3 1.5:1 1.1:1
4 1.5:1 4:1
5 2.4:1 2.6:1
6 2.2:1 2.1:1
13
DISCUSSION
BROILER SURVIVAL
Based on the results of this experiment treatment group (Ross) has a better
survival rate than control group (Hubbard).
FEED CONSUMED
The total amount of feed consumed by control group (Hubbard) was 4.83kg
more than the total amount of feed consumed by treatment group (Ross).
CONCLUSION
It can be concluded that broiler breed Hubbard had a better performance with an
F.C.R of 1.9:1 than broiler breed Ross during this experiment.
RECOMMENDATIONS
LIMITATIONS