Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

RESEARCH ARTICLE | JULY 30 2021

Brain-on-a-Chip: Characterizing the next generation of


advanced in vitro platforms for modeling the central nervous
system
Ben M. Maoz 

APL Bioeng. 5, 030902 (2021)


https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0055812

CrossMark


View Export
Online Citation

02 December 2023 21:39:05


APL Bioengineering PERSPECTIVE scitation.org/journal/apb

Brain-on-a-Chip: Characterizing the next


generation of advanced in vitro platforms
for modeling the central nervous system
Cite as: APL Bioeng. 5, 030902 (2021); doi: 10.1063/5.0055812
Submitted: 3 May 2021 . Accepted: 19 July 2021 .
Published Online: 30 July 2021

Ben M. Maoz1,2,3,a)

AFFILIATIONS
1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
2
Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
3
The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: Bmaoz@tauex.tau.ac.il

ABSTRACT
The complexity of the human brain creates significant, almost insurmountable challenges for neurological drug development. Advanced

02 December 2023 21:39:05


in vitro platforms are increasingly enabling researchers to overcome these challenges, by mimicking key features of the brain’s composition
and functionality. Many of these platforms are called “Brains-on-a-Chip”—a term that was originally used to refer to microfluidics-based sys-
tems containing miniature engineered tissues, but that has since expanded to describe a vast range of in vitro central nervous system (CNS)
modeling approaches. This Perspective seeks to refine the definition of a Brain-on-a-Chip for the next generation of in vitro platforms, iden-
tifying criteria that determine which systems should qualify. These criteria reflect the extent to which a given platform overcomes the chal-
lenges unique to in vitro CNS modeling (e.g., recapitulation of the brain’s microenvironment; inclusion of critical subunits, such as the
blood–brain barrier) and thereby provides meaningful added value over conventional cell culture systems. The paper further outlines
practical considerations for the development and implementation of Brain-on-a-Chip platforms and concludes with a vision for where these
technologies may be heading.
C 2021 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://
V
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0055812

INTRODUCTION innovation in CNS research, toward overcoming the extreme chal-


Neurological disorders take a vast societal toll, claiming some 9 lenges associated with this domain (see below for a discussion of some
million lives each year,1 and imposing an annual economic burden of these challenges).
exceeding $700 billion in the U.S. alone.2 Current estimates suggest The primary pathway to innovation in CNS research is through
that, in the U.S., more than 7 million adults suffer from neurodegener- the development of novel in vitro CNS models. In general, in vitro
ative diseases (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease—5 million; Parkinson’s dis- technologies have made enormous strides in recent years and are
ease—1 million; multiple sclerosis—400k), and at least 15% of becoming so advanced that they may soon replace animal models in
children under the age of 17 have been diagnosed with neurodevelop- many applications7 (see Refs. 8–12 for recent reviews of the use of
mental diseases.3 Overall, neurological disorders are estimated to novel in vitro tools in CNS studies). Prominent advanced in vitro plat-
account for 6.3% of the disease burden worldwide.4 Yet, drug develop- forms include, among others, 3D-printed models,13 organoids,14 and
ment for central nervous system (CNS) disorders remains notoriously Organs-on-a-Chip (OoCs).15 The latter, also referred to as microphy-
failure-prone, with CNS drugs taking 38% longer to be approved com- siological systems, are based on microfluidic chips containing minia-
pared with non-CNS drugs.5 As a result of these difficulties, between ture engineered tissues that represent specific organs and, ideally,
the years 2005 and 2014, many leading pharmaceutical companies recapitulate their key functions. It is predicted that adoption of OoC
substantially reduced their CNS drug development programs and even systems in commercial and academic labs may eventually reduce
eliminated them altogether.6 This trend is of significant concern to research and development costs for each new drug by 10%–26%,
policy makers, who are responding with initiatives to promote within a timescale of 5 years.16 Accordingly, OoCs hold obvious appeal

APL Bioeng. 5, 030902 (2021); doi: 10.1063/5.0055812 5, 030902-1


C Author(s) 2021
V

You might also like