Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HIRARCguidelinesFCE (Ebook) 25 9 17)
HIRARCguidelinesFCE (Ebook) 25 9 17)
HIRARCguidelinesFCE (Ebook) 25 9 17)
FCE-SOSHCo
FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN AWAM
UiTM CAWANGAN PULAU PINANG
13500 PULAU PINANG
1ST Edition
FACULTY OF CIVIL
ENGINEERING
HIRARC GUIDELINES
FOR
CIVIL ENGINEERING
PROGRAM
Prepared by:
ANAS IBRAHIM
ROZAINI RAMLI
DALIAH HASAN
MD FAIZAL ZAKARIA
KAY DORA ABD GHANI
MOHD RAFE ABDUL MAJID
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
CONTENTS
Acknowledgement iii
Contents iv
List of Abbreviation v
Preface vi
1 HIRARC MATTERS 1
2 PROCESS OF HIRARC 4
STEP 1 Classify Work Activities 5
STEP 2 Identify Hazards 7
STEP 3 Assess The Risk 10
STEP 4 Select Risk Control 16
STEP 5 Review Risk Control 21
4 REFERENCES
35
5 APPENDICES
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
PREFACE
This HIRARC Guidelines for Civil Engineering Program
book was prepared to provide a standard procedure on
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) management in work
place, laboratory experiments and equipment for the needs of
students and all faculty members. This guideline was
developed systematically to satisfy the requirements stated by
Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH). This
book was intended to give a full-scale view of how hazard and
risk assessment is being carried out by giving related samples
from laboratory experiments. It is hoped that this book can be
a good source of reference for the end-user in identifying
hazards, assessing the risk, and at the same time to control
the hazards.
The approach adopted in developing this book is to make a
simple note by minimizing words and giving real examples for
different types of hazard risk tasks. A special gratitude was
presented to the Safety and Health Committee of the
Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi MARA
Pulau Pinang as the authors of this book whom succeeded to
produce a useful yet informative guideline. The authors would
sincerely welcome any constructive critic, comments or
suggestions to improve the book in near future.
management.
Identify hazards
Tips:
4. OSH Training
You can ask the question “How many times has this
event happened in the past?”
Assessing likelihood is based on worker experience,
analysis or measurement.
Likelihood levels range from “most likely” to
“inconceivable.”
C. Risk Assessment
1. Elimination
Getting rid of a hazardous job, tool, process,
machine or substance is perhaps the best way of
protecting workers.
Example; a salvage firm might decide to stop buying and
cutting up scrapped bulk fuel tank due to explosion
hazards.
2. Substitution
Sometimes doing the same work in a less
hazardous way is possible.
Example; a hazardous chemical can be replaced with a
less hazardous one. Controls must protect workers from
any new hazards that are created.
3. Engineering Control
a. Redesign – jobs and processes can be
reworked to make them safer.
Example; container can be made easier to hold and lift.
b. Isolation – if a hazard cannot be eliminated
or replaced, it can sometimes be isolated, contained or
otherwise kept away from workers.
Example; an insulated and air-conditioned control room
can protect operators from a toxic chemical.
c. Automation – dangerous processes can be
automated or mechanized. Example; computer-
controlled robots can handle spot welding operations in
car plants. Care must be taken to protect workers from
robotic hazards.
d. Barriers – a hazard can be blocked before it
reaches workers.
Example; special curtains can prevent eye injuries from
welding arc radiation. Proper equipment guarding will
protect workers from contacting moving parts.
e. Absorption – baffles can block or absorb
noise. Lockout systems can isolate energy sources during
repair and maintenance. Usually, the further a control
keeps a hazard away from workers, the more effective it
is.
f. Dilution – some hazards can be diluted or
dissipated.
Example; ventilation systems can dilute toxic gasses
before they reach operators.
4. Administrative Controls
a. Safe Work Procedures (SWP) – workers
can be required to use standardized safety practices. The
employer is expected to ensure that workers follow these
practices. Work procedures must be periodically
reviewed with workers and updated.
b. Supervision and Training – initial training
on safe work procedures and refresher training should
be offered. Appropriate supervision to assist workers in
identifying possible hazards and evaluating work
procedures.
c. Job rotations and reschedule task – it can
reduce the time that workers are exposed to a hazard.
For example, workers can be rotated through jobs
requiring repetitive tendon and muscle movements to
prevent cumulative trauma injuries. Noisy processes can
be scheduled when no one is in the workplace.
d. Housekeeping, repair and maintenances
programs – housekeeping includes cleanings, waste
disposal and spill cleanup. Tools, equipment and
machinery are less likely to cause injury if they are kept
clean and well maintained.
FCE - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER
Function / Department : Structural Division
Title of Activity : Slump Test
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Habibullah (PJ)
Job performed by : Student Section : Concrete Lab
Prepared by / Date : Aliah Binti Abu / 10 Sept. 2017 Checked by / Date : Daliah Hasan / 15 Sept. 2017 Approved by / Date : Anas Ibrahim / 16 Sept. 2017
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT
Recommendation
Recommended Risk Person in Charge/Due
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Control date/ Status
1. prepare SWP for slump
Carpel test.
Aliah / 10 Oct. 17/ in
Vibration tunnel Fabric Glove, Lab manual 3 3 9 II 2. Implementing task
progress
syndrome rotation and time limits on
this activity.
1 Prepare sample : Concrete mix R Hearing Aliah / 12 Sept. 17/
Noise none 4 4 16 III use ear plug
Impairment completed
Mineral dust cancer Fabric Glove, face mask N95 1 4 4 I Satisfied
sprain
heavy lifting Lab manual 4 3 12 II use small buckle (SWP)
muscle
Insert material into the mold of 3 Take frequent break
2 R Repeatitive works stress Lab manual 3 3 9 II
layers (SWP)
sprain Fabric Glove, Safety Boot, lab
3 Compact each layer R Lifting the rod 3 3 9 II SWP & buddy system
muscle manual
sprain Fabric Glove,Safety Boot,
4 Lift up the mold R Lifting the mould 3 3 9 II SWP & buddy system
muscle Lab manual
1. drink plenty of water
5 Measure the height of the collapse R Heat stress dehydrate none 5 2 10 II
2. Take frequent breaks
housekeeping (wipe up
6 Clean the all apparatus R Slip & fall (wet floor) injury Safety Boot 2 3 6 II
spills immediately)
Type of Activity
5 M ost likely The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Habibullah (PJ)
Prepared by / Date : Hanum Binti Mohamad / 10 Sept. 2017 Checked by / Date : Daliah Hasan / 18 Sept. 2017 Approved by / Date : Anas Ibrahim / 18 Sept. 2017
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Recommendation
Recommended Risk Person in Charge/Due
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Control date/ Status
Identify type of material for experiment.
Install material to existing support. Make
1 R
sure all the screws are
tightened.(depend on type of support) Falling Minor
lab manual, Safety shoes 2 2 4 I Satisfied
Object Injury
2 Install dial gauge and load hanger. R
Place load on the load hanger on the
3 R
material.
Repeatitive PJ / 14 Sept. 17/
4 Record reading at dial gauge. R stress lab manual 3 2 6 II Do by grouping
work completed
Falling Minor
5 Increase the load and record reading. R lab manual, safety shoes 2 2 4 I Satisfied
Object Injury
Repeat step 3 to 5 until complete the Repeatitive PJ / 14 Sept. 17/
6 R stress lab manual 3 2 6 II Do by grouping
experiments. work completed
Uninstall all apparatus and stacking Falling Minor
7 R lab manual, safety shoes 2 2 4 I Satisfied
neatly. Object Injury
Type of Activity
R = Routine Likelihood Description
Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Category Risk Level Action and Time Scale
NR = Non Routine
1 Inconceivable Is practically impossible and has never occurred ( RC )
2 Remote/unlikely Has not been known to occur after many years
3 Conceivable Might be occur at sometime in future No additional controls required. Monitoring required to
1- 4 I Tolerable
ensure existing controls are maintained.
4 Possible Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual
5 Most likely The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized
Efforts shall be made to reduce the risk.
Risk reduction measures should be implemented
Severity of Harm ( S )
5 - 12 II Significant within a defined time period.
Rating Nature of Injury / ill health Estimate loss (RM) UiTM Reputation
1 First Aid only < 10 Slightly effected
2 Minor injury (1day MC) <100 Discussion amongst UiTM management level Work should not be started until the risk has been
3 Major injury (> 4 days MC) <1000 Be a customer inquiry reduced. Considerable resources may have to be
15 - 25 III Intolerable
4 Permanent disability <10,000 Be a question amongst Universities allocated to reduce the risk. Where the risk involves
5 Fatal >10,000 Be a KPT enquiry work in progress, urgent action must be taken.
FCE - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER
Function / Department : Structural Division
Title of Activity : BENDING TEST ( REACTION FRAME )
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Faizul (PJ)
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Recommendation
Recommended Control Person in Charge/Due date/
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Measure Status
major injury,
1 Switch on the machine & Computer R Short circuit electric Safety gloves / LAB MANUAL 1 4 4 I Satisfied
shock
Pieces and dust hit blind / minor Safety googles and safety
3 Test running until sample failed R 1 4 4 I Satisfied
eyes injury helmet/ LAB MANUAL
Safety gloves, googles, mask, Wilson/ 15 Sept. 17 /
4 Take out the sample after test R Falling object major injury 4 3 12 II safety shoes
LAB MANUAL, safety helmet completed
5 Measure the crack of the sample R Heat stress Dehydrate Ekzos(ventilation system) 2 2 4 I Satisfied
Type of Activity
R = Routine Likelihood Description
Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Category Risk Level Action and Time Scale
NR = Non Routine
1 Inconceivable Is practically impossible and has never occurred ( RC )
2 Remote/unlikely Has not been known to occur after many years A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable
and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the
3 Conceivable M ight be occur at sometime in future
1- 4 I Tolerable risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures
4 Possible Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual Should be implemented and recorded.
5 M ost likely The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized
FCE - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER
Function / Department : Water Division
Title of Activity : Hydrometer Test
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Abdul Malek Ishak (PJ)
Prepared by / Date : Faradiba Binti Fadhil / 6 Sept. 2017 Checked by / Date : Suzana Ahmad (JKKP-FKA)/ 10 Sept. 17 Approved by / Date : Dr. Kay Dora Abdul Ghani (KPP FKA)/12 Sept. 17
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT
Recommendation
Recommended Risk Person in Charge/Due date/
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Control Status
Place tall glass cylinders on the flat
1 R
working surface
Fill with a liquid and allow air to rise to Faradiba/ 8 Sept. 17/
2 R Broken Glass injury lab manual, Safety glove 3 2 6 II Need wear Safety Shoes
the top Completed
Carefully insert the hydrometer and
3 allow it to settle in the centre of the R
cylinder.
Read the scale,after the hydrometer has
4 settled at the bottom of the free R
watersurface
Record the reading and take out the Musculoskelet
5 R Satisfied (Job rotation or
hydrometer. Repetitive works al disorder teamwork 2 2 4 I
frequent rest breaks)
Repeat the procedure (step 3 to 5) three (MSD)
6 R
times
Follow above procedure for other given
7 R
liquids also.
Compare specific gravities of the given
8 R rushing to finish the test Stress teamwork 2 1 2 I satisfied
liquids.
Type of Activity
5 Most likely The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized
FCE - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER
Function / Department : Geotren Division
Title of Activity : JKR Probe Test
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Azrul Aswad (PJ)
Prepared by / Date : Ali Bin Ahmad / 6 Sept. 2017 Checked by / Date : Rozaini Ramli (JKKP-FKA)/ 10 Sept. 17 Approved by / Date : Dr. Kay Dora Abdul Ghani (KPP FKA)/12 Sept. 17
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT
Recommendation
Recommended Risk Person in Charge/Due date/
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Control Status
1 Bring the JKR Probe set to site location. R Wrong lifting muscle pain None 3 2 6 II
1. SWP,
1. PJ / 6 Oct.17 / in progress
2. Safety briefing by
2 Assemble the JKR probe set up. R Hot environment Heat stress None 4 2 8 II 2. PJ / 8 Sept. 2017/
instructor before
completed
experiment started.
3 mark 300 mm mark on proving rod. R Direct sun exposure Dehydrate None 4 2 8 II
4 Keep the set up vertically R hit by Hammer injury Safety Shoes 1 2 2 I Satisfied
5 Most likely The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized
FCE - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER
Function / Department : Geotren Division
Title of Activity : SKID RESISTANCE TEST
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Suzana Ahmad (PJ)
Prepared by / Date : Daliah Binti Hasan / 6 September 2017 Checked by / Date : Mohd Rafe Abdul Majid / 11 Sep. 2017 Approved by / Date : Anas Ibrahim / 12 Sept. 2017
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Recommendation
Recommended Risk Person in Charge/Due
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Control date/ Status
Moving safety shoes & jacket/colour
major injury 1 3 3 I Satisfied
Bring the equipment at the site ( within traffic cone
1 R
UiTM Pulau Pinang) Wrong safety briefing before Daliah / 8 Sept. 17 /
back pain lab manual 3 2 6 II
lifting experiment Completed
Place equipment on the pavement / Moving safety shoe & jacket/colour
2 R major injury 1 3 3 I Satisfied
experiment location traffic cone
Setup the equipment ( Skid Resistance moving
3 R minor injury safety shoes / lab manual 1 3 3 I Satisfied
) of skid
Repeatit
4 Record the data (3 points) R stress lab manual, Team work 1 2 2 I Satisfied
ive
Moving Accident,
safety jacket/colour cone 1 3 3 I Satisfied
traffic major injury
5 Bring the equipment back to the lab R
Falling
injured Safety Shoes 2 2 4 I Satisfied
object
Type of Activity
R = Routine Likelihood Description Risk
Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Category ( Risk Level Action and Time Scale
NR = Non Routine 1 Inconceivable Is practically impossible and has never occurred RC )
A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable
2 Remote/unlikely Has not been known to occur after many years
and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the
3 Conceivable Might be occur at sometime in future risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control
1- 4 I Tolerable
measures
4 Possible Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual
Should be implemented and recorded.
5 Most likely The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized
A MEDIUM risk requires a planned approach to
controlling the hazard and applies temporary
Severity of Harm ( S ) measure if required. Actions taken must be
5 - 12 II Significant
documented on the risk assessment Form including
Rating Nature of Injury / il health Estimate loss (RM) UiTM Reputation date for completion.
Prepared by / Date : Ali Bin Amran / 6 Sept. 2017 Checked by / Date : Rozaini Binti Ramli(JKKP-FKA) / 9 Sept. 2017 Approved by / Date : Anas Ibrahim (Ketua JKKP-FKA)/ 9 sept. 17
RISK CONTROL
RISK ASSESSMENT
Recommendation
Recommended Control
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = L x S RC Person in Charge/Due date/ Status
Measure
1. Mask N95
Silicosis / 1. Ali / 11 sept. 17 / completed
2. Prepare Safe Work
(i) Mineral dust Lung Lab Manual 4 4 16 III 2. Rossefendy / 10 Oct. 17 / in
Procedure (SWP) for Point
For diametral test, core the sample so Cancer progress
load test.
1 that the length should be more than 0.5
of the depth or (L>0.5D)
(ii) flying object (small Rossefendy / 11 sept. 17 /
Injury Lab Manual, Fabric Glove 4 2 8 II Goggle / full mask shield
crush rock) Completed
Type of Activity
5 M ost likely The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized
FCE - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER
Function / Department : CEPM Division
Title of Activity : Fire Alarm System
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Nurul Nor Fazlina (PJ)
Prepared by / Date : Amin Bin Abdul Halim / 8 Sept. 2017 Checked by / Date : Rozaini Ramli (JKKP-FKA)/ 10 Sept. 17 Approved by / Date : Dr. Kay Dora Abdul Ghani (KPP FKA)/12 Sept. 17
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Recommendation
Recommended Risk Person in Charge/Due date/
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Control Status
Type of Activity
R = Routine Rating Likeihood Description
Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Category Risk Level Action and Time Scale
NR = Non Routine Inconceivable
1 Is practically impossible and has never occurred ( RC )
2 Remote/unlikely Has not been known to occur after many years A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable
and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the
3 Conceivable Might be occur at sometime in future
1- 4 I Tolerable risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures
4 Possible Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual Should be implemented and recorded.
5 Most likely The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Md. Faizal Zakaria (Science Asst. Officer)
Job performed by : Student Section : Environmental Lab
Prepared by / Date : Kamal Bin Kassim / 6 Sept. 2017 Checked by / Date : Suzana (JKKP-FKA)/ 10 Sept. 17 Approved by / Date : Dr. Kay Dora Abdul Ghani (KPP FKA)/12 Sept. 17
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Recommendation
Recommended Risk Person in Charge/Due date/
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Control Status
Type of Activity
R = Routine Rating Likeihood Description
Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Category Risk Level Action and Time Scale
NR = Non Routine Inconceivable
1 Is practically impossible and has never occurred ( RC )
FCE - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER
Function / Department : Structural Division
Title of Activity : Using computer
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Azri (Computer Assistant)
Job performed by : Student Section : Computer Lab
Prepared by / Date : Ali Bin Ahmad / 6 Sept. 2017 Checked by / Date : Rozaini Ramli (JKKP-FKA)/ 10 Sept. 17 Approved by / Date : Dr. Kay Dora Abdul Ghani (KPP FKA)/12 Sept. 17
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Recommendation
Recommended Risk Person in Charge/Due date/
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Control Status
long hour of seating back pain none 4 2 8 I ergonomic chair Ali / 10.1.18/ KIV
rest for every 2 hrs (include
1 Use of Computer R repeatitive work Stress / RSI none 4 2 8 I
in SWP)
Ali / 10.10.17/ in progress
rest for every 2 hrs (include
Radiation cancer none 2 4 8 I Ali / 10.10.17/ in progress
in SWP)
Prepare SWP for whole
Radiation Eye sore Manual instruction 3 3 9 I Ali / 10.10.17/ in progress
process
2 Printing R
hit by falling object injury Housekeeping 2 2 4 I satisfied
Type of Activity
FCE - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER
Function / Department : Geotren Division
Title of Activity : Traverse Surveying
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Amer Khomeny (Lecturer)
Job performed by : Lab Assistant Engineer (PJ) Section : Surveying Lab
Prepared by / Date : Mohd Saleh / 6 Sept. 2017 Checked by / Date : Mohd Rafe Abdul Majid (JKKP-FKA) / 12 Sep.17 Approved by / Date : Anas Ibrahim (Ketua JKKP-FKA) / 13 Sep. 2017
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT Recommendation
Recommended Risk Person in Charge/Due
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Control date/ Status
Type of Activity
R = Routine Rating Likeihood Description
Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Category Risk Level Action and Time Scale
NR = Non Routine Inconceivable Is practically impossible and has never occurred
1 ( RC )
2 Remote/unlikely Has not been known to occur after many years A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable
Might be occur at sometime in future and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the
3 Conceivable
1- 4 I Tolerable risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures
4 Possible Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual Should be implemented and recorded.
5 Most likely The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized
FCE - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK CONTROL ( HIRARC ) REGISTER
Function / Department : Office
Title of Activity : Office Work
Legal : ACT 514 / ACT 139 / ACT302 / ACT 127 Assessor: Nil
Job performed by : Student Section : Ruang Pejabat Ting. 6 Kompleks perdana, UiTMPP
Prepared by / Date : Ali Bin Ahmad / 6 Sept. 2017 Checked by / Date : Rozaini Ramli (JKKP-FKA)/ 10 Sept. 17 Approved by / Date : Dr. Kay Dora Abdul Ghani (KPP FKA)/12 Sept. 17
RISK CONTROL
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT
Recommendation
Recommended Risk Person in Charge/Due date/
No. Sub-Activity Type Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control L S RPN = LxS RC Control Status
Prepare SWP for whole
Radiation Eye sore Manual instruction 3 3 9 I Ali / 10.10.17/ in progress
1 Photocopying, binding, printing & faxing R process
hit by falling object injury Housekeeping 2 2 4 I satisfied
long hour of seating back pain none 4 2 8 I ergonomic chair Ali / 10.1.18/ KIV
rest for every 2 hrs (include
2 Use of Computer R repeatitive work Stress / RSI none 4 2 8 I
in SWP)
Ali / 10.10.17/ in progress
rest for every 2 hrs (include
Radiation cancer none 2 4 8 I Ali / 10.10.17/ in progress
in SWP)
3 Filing R hit by falling object injury Housekeeping 4 1 4 I satisfied
5 Wash room R Wet floor (slip & fall) injury none 4 3 12 I put anti-slip mat + signage Ali / 10.10.17/ in progress
6
Type of Activity
R = Routine Rating Likeihood Description
Risk Priority Number ( RPN ) Risk Category Risk Level Action and Time Scale
NR = Non Routine Inconceivable
1 Is practically impossible and has never occurred ( RC )
2 Remote/unlikely Has not been known to occur after many years A risk identified as LOW may be considered as acceptable
Conceivable and further reduction may not be necessary. However, if the
3 Might be occur at sometime in future
1- 4 I Tolerable risk can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control measures
4 Possible Has a good chance of occurring and is not unusual Should be implemented and recorded.
5 Most likely The most likely result of the hazard/ event being relized
REFERENCES
List of references
Appendix A
FCE HIRARC REGISTER FORM
Appendix B
EXAMPLES OF WORKPLACE HAZARDS
Hazard Workplace
(Unsafe Condition / unsafe Act)
Effects/ Consequences
demotivated stress
Appendix C
EXAMPLE OF SAFE WORK PROCEDURE (SWP)