Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hunsc Uk-2
Hunsc Uk-2
Introduction:
SIMRANS GSL SPEECH:
The United Kingdom is adamant that it is crucial to address the dangers that Al-Qaeda
poses to global security. In our collaborative effort to achieve peace and security, the launch
of the Global War on Terror (GWOT) in response to the 9/11 attacks marked a turning point.
The UK is steadfast in its commitment to continuing the war against terrorism through
diplomatic initiatives, intelligence sharing, and the application of the law. We are steadfast in
our commitment to stopping this threat and are aware that Al-Qaeda's threat is far from over.
In this effort, we appeal to the international community to increase our shared commitment to
counterterrorism activities, improve our procedures for exchanging intelligence, and assist
the impacted regions in bolstering their resistance to extremism.
We must continue to fight terrorism together in order to defend the principles of peace,
freedom, and security during these challenging times. The UK is ready to cooperate with
other countries to create a more secure and safe world for everyone.
Thank you.
Simrans Introduction:
The launch of the Global War on Terror (GWOT) in reaction to the horrific 9/11 atrocities was
a turning point in history, which the United Kingdom acknowledges. We're here today to
reaffirm our dedication to countering the ongoing and changing dangers that Al-Qaeda
poses to global security.
We must keep in mind that the war against terrorism is still being waged as we talk about the
GWOT. Al-Qaeda has changed, scattered, and kept posing a danger to international
security. We must act decisively in response.
The United Kingdom has engaged in diplomatic efforts, humanitarian aid, and regional
development as part of our commitment to combating terrorism. We sincerely think that
combating extremism requires addressing its underlying causes, fostering education, and
aiding underprivileged groups.
We also stress how crucial international collaboration is to intelligence sharing, law
enforcement, and counter-radicalization initiatives. We can destroy the networks that support
terrorism by working together.
The GWOT includes addressing the social, economic, and political issues that fuel
radicalization in addition to military actions. All nations are urged by the United Kingdom to
step up their efforts in this all-encompassing strategy.
Finally, we must modify our tactics to account for Al-Qaeda's changing level of threat. The
United Kingdom is still steadfast in its commitment to this cause, and we ask other countries
to join us in achieving a more tranquil and secure world for everyone.
Thank you.
RESEARCH:
The United Kingdom's stance in countering the threats posed by Al-Qaeda and addressing
international security can be summarized as follows:
Overall, the UK's stance in this matter is one of active and comprehensive engagement in
the fight against terrorism and the promotion of international security. It seeks to balance
effective counterterrorism measures with the protection of human rights and the rule of law,
recognizing that a multifaceted approach is essential in addressing the complex and evolving
challenges posed by groups like Al-Qaeda.
RESEARCH:
2. Formation of GWOT
Initiated in reaction to the 9/11 attacks, the Global War on Terror (GWOT) became a turning
point in international counterterrorism operations. It reflected a commitment on everyone's
part to fight global terrorism, involving alliances like NATO and UN-backed missions. To
disrupt terrorist networks, key tactics included intelligence sharing, military interventions,
counter-radicalization initiatives, and money tracking.
4. Evolution of Al-Qaeda
Al-Qaeda experienced considerable adjustments in the wake of 9/11 to accommodate
counterterrorism initiatives. It utilized online tools for recruitment and propaganda while
decentralizing its organizational structure, working with regional affiliates. The 2004 Madrid
train bombs, the 2005 London bombings, and more recent strikes in Europe, Africa, and Asia
all show how adaptable and resilient Al-Qaeda and its affiliates are.
5. Current Threats
For as long as it exists, Al-Qaeda threatens global security. It focuses on recruitment
techniques that take advantage of political resentments, social unrest, and online
radicalization and maintains a persistent presence in conflict zones, particularly in
Afghanistan, Yemen, and Syria. In areas with poor governance, there have been attempts to
set up new operating bases, complicating anti-terrorism measures.
6. Counterterrorism Measures
In order to disrupt Al-Qaeda networks, counterterrorism efforts have included international
intelligence collaboration, military interventions, financial tracking, and border controls.
Successful operations, like the death of Osama bin Laden, have made the organization more
vulnerable. Stronger counterterrorism measures have been made possible by international
alliances like the Global Counterterrorism Forum (GCTF).
- The United States put into action a comprehensive counterterrorism policy in the wake of
the September 11 attacks with the goal of boosting homeland security and averting
further terrorist strikes. The Department of Homeland Security was established as part of
this policy, and it coordinated efforts to defend the United States from terrorist threats. It
also included major advancements in airport security protocols, intelligence-sharing
between law enforcement organizations, and the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act, which
increased monitoring and investigation authority to thwart possible threats.
The international community supported the United States in its war on terrorism.
A framework for international counterterrorism initiatives was formed by UN
Security Council resolutions, such as Resolution 1373, which emphasized the
necessity of international cooperation on matters like intelligence sharing and
sanctions against terrorist organizations.
Challenges in Afghanistan:
The post-9/11 era saw an evolution in the danger landscape. The development of
domestic terrorism, the creation of the Islamic State (ISIS), and the use of the
internet for recruiting and radicalization were among the new threats.
Governments had to overcome these obstacles and devise methods to effectively
counter emerging threats.
Osama bin Laden was killed in Pakistan in 2011 thanks to a successful operation,
which was a big victory for the GWOT. Al-Qaeda and affiliated organizations
continue to operate in a number of places, including Yemen, Syria, and North
Africa, therefore the difficulties still exist. The GWOT has seen both victories and
persistent security issues.
The necessity of upholding human rights and the rule of law in counterterrorism
measures is emphasized by international legal instruments such the resolutions
on counterterrorism passed by the United Nations Security Council. The
worldwide counterterrorism policy continues to place a high priority on striking a
balance between security precautions and the protection of individual rights.
The GWOT has had a significant and enduring effect on global security. It had an
impact on international foreign policies, military operations, and counterterrorism
tactics. It also emphasized how crucial it is to face the sophisticated and
changing terrorist threats in the wake of 9/11.
The GWOT benefited greatly from the military and logistical support that multilateral
organizations like NATO provided in a number of operational areas, most notably in
Afghanistan. NATO's involvement emphasized the value of collective security initiatives in
fending off global threats.
2. Supporting Fragile States: In order to help fragile and conflict-affected states establish
stable governance, security infrastructure, and socioeconomic opportunities, the UK can give
foreign aid and development assistance top priority. This strategy supports global security,
tackles the underlying causes of extremism, and is consistent with the UK's foreign policy
goals of international assistance and development.
3. Promoting Human Rights and the Rule of Law: The UK can advocate for the
significance of upholding international legal norms, upholding human rights, and
guaranteeing that counterterrorism activities adhere to legal requirements. This strategy is
consistent with the UK's foreign policy commitment to the global advancement of democracy
and human rights.
5. Intelligence Sharing and Diplomacy: To create tighter links with allies in the fight
against terrorism, the UK can continue to improve its intelligence-sharing capabilities and
diplomatic initiatives. These actions support the UK's foreign policy aims of diplomacy and
international security.
These foreign policy strategies are consistent with the UK's support for human rights, global
stability, and international security, all of which are essential components in combating the
dangers to international security presented by Al-Qaeda. The UK may actively participate in
these projects and take the lead in promoting a safer and more secure world.
United States: In terms of international security, the United States and the United
Kingdom have a long-standing and close relationship. In the War on Terror, they have
worked closely together on several occasions, including military operations,
intelligence sharing, and counterterrorism initiatives.
NATO Allies: The UK benefits from a solid alliance with other NATO members as a
member of the alliance. This alliance is a crucial ally in fending off international
challenges, notably those presented by Al-Qaeda, as it supports measures of
collective defense and security.
European Union: Despite leaving the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom still
maintains security co-operation with other EU members. Sharing of intelligence, law
enforcement initiatives, and counterterrorism strategies are all part of this
relationship.
Five Eyes Alliance: The United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand are
members of the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing coalition, together with the United
Kingdom. This relationship is essential for sharing intelligence and exchanging
information in counterterrorism and security operations.
United Nations: The UK participates in a variety of counterterrorism activities with a
wide range of UN member states. It has backed UN resolutions and initiatives to stop
terrorism and deal with its causes globally.
Middle Eastern Allies: The UK has developed ties with a number of Middle Eastern
countries, especially those that are important allies in the fight against terrorism
including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates.
Coalition Partners: The UK has participated in coalition initiatives, such as the
Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS, to combat terrorism in particular geographic areas.
These coalitions frequently consist of various governments working together to
combat threats from extremists.
Al-Qaeda and other extremist organisations continue to pose a threat, and the UK's alliances
and partnerships are essential to combating these threats together. These joint initiatives
improve intelligence exchange, military cooperation, and the global application of
counterterrorism policies.
The United Kingdom's stance in countering the threats posed by Al-Qaeda and addressing
international security can be summarized as follows:
Overall, the UK's stance in this matter is one of active and comprehensive engagement in
the fight against terrorism and the promotion of international security. It seeks to balance
effective counterterrorism measures with the protection of human rights and the rule of law,
recognizing that a multifaceted approach is essential in addressing the complex and evolving
challenges posed by groups like Al-Qaeda.
ADDITIONAL NOTES:
Once debate starts:
someone is gonna move to open debate
everyone will vote on it
then the chairs will ask for motion on the floor
two main motions to choose from:
- moderated caucus/Mod: set speaking time, set time in general and a set topic. Very
formal and moderated by the chair.
- unmoderated caucus/ unmod: no speaking time limit, no topic, set overall tone
- typically used when delegates want to get out of their seat and walk around and
work with other groups known as blocks to finish anf write their resolutions
to move for a mod you’d say for example” United kingdom moves for a 5 30 (which
means 5 mins and 30 secs of speaking time) on for example national sovereignty
to move for an unmod you’d say “Russia moves for 10 minute unmoderated caucus”
The goal of this is to eventually develop a paper called a resolution that aims to solve
the issue in hand which is your agenda for example 9/11. make sure ur resolution
sticks for foreign policy that’s important
how to write resolution paper: start off with a name of the commitee
and then acronym which in this case is GWOT which is global war on terror
if you are actively writing most of the resolution, should be first in the “SPONSORS”
list to get credit. “SIGNATORIES” list is people who most of the time disagree or hate
the paper.
Perambulatory causes should be included which lay out the foundation of what the
paper is trying to do.
Then there is operative clauses which are the important ones. these are actually
there to lay down what’s gonna happen with the resolution. if u have trouble writing
any of them don’t be afraid to consult ur co delegate or other delegates
a resolution is a group effort and should be done as a group.
have everyone write the paper on laptop or paper, everyone uses a separate pen
color to differentiate which country said what. this is a great way to see who’s doing
what and to make sure u get credit for all writing ur doing
after resolutions then u will have authors panel where SPONSORS stand in front of
all the delegates and like get absolutely grilled on their paper. delegates who excel at
authors panel are usually the best of the best
after authors panel there will be a short period of amendments to work with the
opposing block to make changes to their paper and they’ll try to make changes to
yours. try to work n be cooperative it can usually result in getting ur paper passed
which is always good
ALWAYS REFER TO COUNTRY IN THIRD PERSON NO USING I’S
If a country calls you out negatively in debate you can ask for a right of reply “do i
have a right to reply?” where u can retort their accusations
try to speak every opportunity u can ,several times in a mod if u have to.
try to make motions every opportunity you can.
chairs notice tbis. make an effort to lead ur block. be nice and assertive. DO NOT
WORK WITH KUST THE ALLIES AND FRIENDLY COUBTRIES, foreign policy
should always trump personal connections you should know before hand who ur
allowed to work with
when a crisis is there it involves face paced planning a lot of action and a lot of
cheating lying and manipulation
In a crisis room ur not a country but an individual, rooms are not present day
problems but historical or fictional. You don’t work on massive resolutions but past
these smaller things called directives
they accomplish the same things, just directives are far smaller and get past typically
hourly
in crisis there are two rooms: - front room: where normal debate goes
-back room: use notes to advance a crisis arc by writing to literally anyone for
exampek the secretary, president, anhone. crisis arc is a grand plan that takes place
over the course of commitee . Plan can be anything but most crisis arcs include stuff
like starting a new religion, overthrowing current government, going to war with
literally everyone in the room or taking the entire room down with you. and if there’s a
crisis every few hours the room will receive a crisis update where the back room
comes out and updates the room
talk as much as possible ina. crisis room. explain ur end goal.
Make a GSL speech for UK in the HUNSC on the agenda “the formation of the global war on
terror in response to the 9/11 attacks with special emphasis on the threats that Al quaeda
poses to international security
GSL speech
Honorable Chairs, esteemed delegates,
The United Kingdom stands before this august assembly today to address the issue of
paramount importance - the formation of the Global War on Terror in response to the 9/11
attacks, with a special focus on the persistent threats that Al-Qaeda poses to international
security.
The events of September 11, 2001, marked a watershed moment in our shared history. The
attacks on the United States shook the world to its core, and in their aftermath, the
international community rallied to confront the sinister specter of terrorism. Among the prime
threats to global peace and security was Al-Qaeda, a terrorist organization led by Osama bin
Laden, which was responsible for these heinous acts.
Al-Qaeda's agenda, rooted in extremism and violence, poses a clear and present danger to
international security. This organization has demonstrated a willingness to carry out acts of
terror on a global scale, disregarding borders and humanity's most fundamental values. Its
ideology seeks to disrupt and dismantle the existing world order and replace it with a twisted
vision of the future.
The Global War on Terror, initiated in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, was an essential
response to the challenges posed by Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups. The United
Kingdom wholeheartedly supported this initiative, recognizing that terrorism knows no
boundaries and that international cooperation is imperative.
Over the years, significant progress has been made in reducing Al-Qaeda's capabilities and
influence. The relentless efforts of the international community, intelligence agencies, and
military forces have led to the elimination of key Al-Qaeda figures, including Osama bin
Laden himself. However, Al-Qaeda has shown remarkable adaptability and resilience,
morphing into decentralized and regional affiliates.
Today, we must acknowledge that Al-Qaeda remains a threat. Its affiliates in Yemen, North
Africa, and the Sahel continue to pose challenges to international security. The ideology that
underpins Al-Qaeda's actions remains potent, drawing disillusioned individuals into its ranks
and inspiring acts of terror worldwide.
In light of these ongoing threats, the United Kingdom urges this committee to reinvigorate
international cooperation in the fight against terrorism. We must strengthen
intelligence-sharing mechanisms, enhance border security, and develop a unified strategy to
counter the global reach of groups like Al-Qaeda. Furthermore, it is vital that we address the
root causes of extremism, including poverty, lack of education, and political instability, which
often provide fertile ground for the growth of terrorist organizations.
The United Kingdom remains committed to working with the international community to
eradicate the menace of terrorism, with a special emphasis on Al-Qaeda. We firmly believe
that by working together, we can safeguard the principles of peace and security upon which
the United Nations was founded.
In conclusion, we call upon all nations to stand united against the threats to international
security, like Al-Qaeda, and to reaffirm our collective commitment to maintaining global
peace and stability. Let us remember the victims of 9/11 and all those who have suffered at
the hands of terrorism as we strive to create a safer and more secure world for future
generations.
Thank you.