Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Miah 2014
Miah 2014
Resources Management
http://hrm.sagepub.com/
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management can
be found at:
Subscriptions: http://hrm.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://hrm.sagepub.com/content/1/1/67.refs.html
What is This?
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to explore and compare human resource man-
agement (HRM) practices between foreign and local garment companies operat-
ing in Bangladesh. This study surveyed 30 human resource, administrative and
factory managers of different levels of three garment companies: one US subsidi-
ary, one UK subsidiary and one Bangladesh company. Results show that a blend
of HRM practices has been adopted by the foreign companies, ranging between
imitating home country practices and host country practices. Results also found
that foreign garment companies focus more on home country HRM practices,
especially in the area of selection and recruitment, training and development,
performance appraisal process and top management appointments. Foreign
garment companies are widely adopting host country HRM practices in indus-
trial relations and compensational benefit. However, Bangladeshi local garment
company is following traditional HRM practices and showing interest in learning
from the foreign company HRM practices. Since this study is based on a limited
number of companies, generalization of findings of this study for cross-cultural
adaptation/adjustment in other developing countries should be made with cau-
tion. Combination of home and host country HRM practices can have a positive
influence on transfer of HRM practices in developing nations. It could open a
new avenue for further potential research on HRM practices in the South Asian
business context, especially in the garment industry.
Keywords
HRM practices, Bangladesh, US, UK, garment industry
Md. Khasro Miah, Professor, School of Business, North South University, Dhaka,
Bangladesh. E-mails: khasro@northsouth.edu; ksmnsu@gmail.com
Muhammed Siddique Hossain, Senior Lecturer, School of Business, North South
University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. E-mails: s.hossain@northsouth.edu; s.hossain355@gmail.com
Introduction
In recent years, many research studies have been conducted on human resource
management (HRM) practices in host countries through the subsidiaries of multi-
national companies (MNCs) (Farley, Hoenig & Yang, 2004; Ferner, 1997; Gamble,
2003). The main drawback of the existing research is the restricted focus on
Western MNCs (Almond, Edwards & Clark, 2003; Edwards & Ferner, 2004;
Farley, Hoenig & Yang, 2004; Ferner & Quintanilla, 1998; Ferner & Varul, 1999;
Guest & Hoque, 1996; Innes & Morris, 1995; Muller, 1998; Tayeb, 1998). A lim-
ited number of studies have been conducted on this issue in the context of devel-
oping countries (Miah & Bird, 2007; Miah & Wali, 2012).
The spread of MNCs in developing countries and their ability to break through
cross-border constraints in exercising home country HRM practices has been an
issue in research. The rapid progress of the South Asian countries, especially
Bangladesh, has attracted foreign investment, which demands efficient HRM prac-
tices. Previous studies revealed that cross-cultural research is continuing to be writ-
ten from either an American or European point of view, rather than from an
international perspective (Adler & Ghadar, 1991; Brewster & Scullion, 1997).
A number of scholars have identified a need for more research on HRM practices
in South Asia due to the limited number of comparative HRM studies between
developing and developed countries (Budhwar & Sparrow, 2001; Miah & Kitamura,
2005; Miah, Wakabayashi & Takeuchi, 2003). One primary issue in the literature is
to what extent MNCs and their subsidiaries’ practices resemble the parent company
and host country practices. Several authors have acknowledged that HRM repre-
sents a major restriction when MNCs are trying to implement global strategies in
the different cultural and institutional framework of each affiliate where the MNCs
operate (Edwards, 2004; Myloni, Harzing & Mirza, 2003).
When adopting HRM strategies and practices, MNCs have identified dual pres-
sures of home and host country institutional atmosphere—both push and pull force
(Farley et al., 2004; Hillman & Wan, 2005; Rosenzweig & Nohria, 1994; Taylor,
Beechler & Napier, 1996). These dual pressures have an effect on HRM practices of
MNCs at subsidiary level in the South Asian countries. Earlier comparative researches
on HRM in South Asia have identified the significance of firm’s national origin and
culture (Awasthi, Chow & Wu, 2001; Bae, Shyh-jer & Lawler, 1998; Chow, Harrison,
McKinnon & Wu, 2000; Chow, Shields & Wu, 1999; Hofstede, 1993; Huang, 2000;
Miah & Bird, 2007). These studies also addressed how cultural and institutional dif-
ferences affect the sharing of HRM strategies and practices by MNCs.
There is a close association between organizational structures and decentraliza-
tion of employment relations. A considerable variation of MNCs involvement on
different dimensions of HRM practices is observed (Hamill, 1992). Japanese MNCs
have greater control over HRM practices in their subsidiaries (Beechler & Yang,
1994; Dedousis, 1994; Pudelko & Harzing, 2008). Some MNCs are controlling their
HRM structures globally taking into account the host countries’ policies and prac-
tices, as some researchers found a blend of HRM practices in MNCs’ subsidiaries
(Hannon, Huang & Jaw, 1995; Taylor & Bechler, 1993). Rarely an MNC is found to
completely follow home country HRM practices. The headquarters’ influences
depend on the employment regulation in the host country and the role of individual
subsidiaries (Harzing, 2004; Myloni, 2002; Rosenzweig & Nohira, 1994).
Methodology
Sampling and Data Collection
For this research, one Bangladeshi garment company, one US-based and one
UK-based garment company operating in Bangladesh were selected. Table 1 pro-
vides background information of these three companies. The comparative
research on Ready Made Garment (RMG) industry in HRM area is very limited.
A judgement sampling was used in order to collect in-depth information to
achieve the objective of the study. A questionnaire, consisting of different dimen-
sions of HRM practices was developed to collect the data from the selected com-
panies. Some of the dimensions included in the questionnaire are: recruitment,
training and development, promotion policy, performance appraisal, compensa-
tion, etc. An official appointment with the HRM managers was scheduled; the
questionnaire was handed in to the interviewees ahead of time; and face to face
interviews with the interviewees were completed afterwards. From a selected
pool of (10 × 3) 30 managers—human resource, administrative and factory—
from the respective companies, data were collected with the structured question-
naire from all 30 respondents and then, face to face semi-structured interviews
were conducted.
Results
Recruitment and Selection
Table 2 shows the hiring and selection approaches of foreign and local garment
companies. Results indicate that the Bangladeshi garment company uses less
standardized selection methods. It prefers internal recruitment, makes more use of
references, base their selection on less objective criteria compared to foreign com-
panies. However, curriculum vitae and interviews play an important role in
employee selection in the local garment company. The interviews with local HR
manager revealed that recommendations and social networking are not as impor-
tant. Moreover, the local garment company places emphasis on internal recruit-
ment and less on qualifications, which is an indication of a slow shift of the local
company towards the use of more objective selection criteria.
US- and UK-based garment companies are using structured recruitment meth-
ods. When it comes to managerial and professional/technical recruitments, they
advertise externally, conduct competency-based interviews and use recruitment
agencies frequently.
For clerical employee recruitment, internal advertisement and word of mouth
recruitment are used by the foreign companies. The foreign companies put high
importance on designing and evaluating outcome of the training of employees and
coordinating less on local cultural norms and values in the selection process.
Firm’s country
of origin Bangladesh UK US
Job description Unstructured Well structured, well Well structured in the
and specification defined, in each level mid and upper level,
moderate structure in
entry level
Promotion Not practised Observed in the mid Happened few times
of current level posts but mostly outsourced
employees
Method of Walk-in, referrals, Walk-in, referrals, Walk-in, referrals,
advertisement newspaper, posters newspaper, websites newspaper, websites
Recruitment Internal Internal, external Internal, external
sources
Use of Not practised Some times Not practised
recruitment
agencies
Apprentices Not practised Some times Some times
Selection process For entry level its For entry level its For entry level its
walk in interview, for walk in interview, walk in interview,
mid level, verbal and for mid level, verbal for mid level, verbal
interview and written test and and written test and
interview interview
Psychometric Not practised For mid and high For mid level
testing level
References Not always Yes Yes
check
Aptitude test No Yes Yes
Parent company Not applicable as it is Strong influence in Moderate influence in
influence a local company decision-making decision-making
Firm’s country
of origin Bangladesh UK US
Design and Unstructured 36 hours training is Need based training
development mandatory per year,
Training Less priority Use both on-the-job More focused on on-
implementation given to on-the- and off-the-job training the-job training than
job training modality on off-the-job
Training evaluation No structured Training outcome Training outcome
and outcome method found considered with high considered
importance while with moderate
designing the next importance while
training programme designing the next
training programme
Support for training Depends on Both in-house and In-house resource
in-house and outsourced resource gets main focus
outsourced utilized.
sources
Influence of parent Not applicable Strong influence Moderate influence,
company training as it is a local observed local subsidiary
strategy company mainly decides the
training strategy
Training location Home country Home and host Home and host
country country
Coaching by Followed Considered a highly Considered a highly
supervisors sometimes effective tool effective tool
depends on
needs
Job rotation Not practised Practices at the entry Practices at the entry
level level
Overseas training Not practised Department heads Only for the top
are sent for overseas officials
training depending
upon the need
Techniques Coaching by Coaching, Coaching, informal
for employee supervisors or apprenticeship, learning, role playing
development department informal learning, job
seniors rotation, role playing
Skill training by Not practised Yes, for professional Sometimes
outside agency level, it is applicable
Table 4. Comparison of Performance Appraisal Process between the Local and Foreign
Companies
Firm’s country
of origin Bangladesh UK US
Methods of Unstructured Rating scale method is Rating scale method is
performance followed followed
appraisal
Time interval Once a year Once a year, usually Once a year, usually
of performance December December/January
appraisal
Problems of Did not cover 360 degree feedback 360 degree feedback
performance all the required is not reflected is not reflected
appraisal factors
Feedback of Verbal feedback Written feedback given Written feedback
performance given to employee to employee given to employee
appraisal
Influence of parent Not applicable To a moderate extent, Followed in a limited
company as it is a local headquarter adoption extent headquarter
company is visible adoption is visible
Performance Appraisal
Performance appraisal system used by the responding companies is presented in
Table 4. The survey results showed that key employees, managers and professional/
technical staff are frequently appraised formally on an individual basis. The domi-
nant purpose of performance appraisal is to set personal objectives and review
progress over the past objectives and to assess suitability for promotion or trans-
fers. The methods of performance appraisal are unstructured in the local company.
Both the foreign companies are, however, following rating scale method.
The foreign companies provide written feedback to the employees and the local
companies choose verbal feedback. Table 4 shows that foreign garment companies
extensively integrate and utilize performance appraisal. In contrast, the local com-
pany tends to handle its performance appraisal system at a basic level. The local
company does not conduct formal performance appraisal system. The purpose of
performance appraisal in the local company is not linked with career planning. The
measurement criteria of all companies studied are performance oriented. The foreign
companies are relatively more comprehensive, standardized and job specific.
Table 5. Comparison of Compensation and Benefits between the Local and Foreign
Companies
Firm’s country
of origin Bangladesh UK US
Compensation Moderate Structured Structured
structure
Designing of Follow market Market trends, competency Market trends,
compensation trends based payment, house rent competency based
strategy for mid level professionals payment
Non-monetary Not practised Team recognition, paid Success celebration,
benefits vacation, overseas tours paid vacation with
for mid and high level family
employees
Payment system Based on Based on company Based on company
company payroll payroll system added with payroll system
system performance bonus
Parent company Not applicable To a moderate extent, local Followed to a
influence as it is a local adoption is visible limited extent
company
Types of rewards Monetary Monetary and non- Monetary and non-
rewards monetary rewards monetary rewards
Types of benefits Provident fund Health insurance, gratuity, Gratuity, provident
provident fund fund
Monetary Festival bonus Festival and performance Festival and
rewards bonus performance bonus
Equal Yes. However, Yes. Both male and female Yes. Both male
employment mid and employees get equal and female
opportunity professional opportunity employees get equal
level posts are opportunity
dominated by
male
The formula for compensation seems to be comparable with the local com-
pany. In designing compensation strategy, the local company follows market
trends and the foreign companies use competency-based payment system. Non-
monetary benefits are also practised by the foreign companies such as team rec-
ognition, paid vacation, overseas tours and success celebration. The local company
tends to show its preference towards a seniority based pay system. In foreign
companies, home country practices do exist in the case of compensation. The
equal employment opportunity (EEO) law is practised in foreign companies.
However, this concept is partially practised by the local company. In the area of
compensation and benefits, parent company influence was not visible.
Table 6. Comparison of Promotion Policy between the Local and Foreign Companies
Firm’s country
of origin Bangladesh UK US
Core criteria for Job tenure along Technical competency Technical
promotion with supervisor competency along
recommendation with supervisor
recommendation
Importance Highly important Supervisor Highly important
of supervisors recommendation
recommendation along with technical
competency count
Importance of loyalty Highly important loyalty along with Loyalty considered
the company competency counts irrelevant,
competency counts
Age as promotion To a moderate No No
criterion? extent
Gender as promotion No No No
criterion?
Importance of right Highly important Highly important Highly important
attitudes and values
Promotion test Not practised Not practised Not practised
Importance of Performance To a great extent To a moderate
performance appraisal appraisal is not extent
on promotion practised
Parent company Not applicable Strong influence No influence, local
influence as it is a local in decision-making subsidiary is the
company regarding head count sole authority for
promotion
Promotion Policy
Table 6 shows that job tenure and competence get priority in the foreign compa-
nies for promotion. Job tenure is, however, the sole promotion criterion in the case
of the local company.
Technical competency is the core criterion for promotion at foreign companies.
Importance of employee loyalty, attitudes and values get the highest priority in
both local and foreign companies. In regard to company influence, unlike US, the
UK-based company has showed influence in decision-making.
Industrial Relation
Table 7 demonstrates that all the companies have maintained a good relationship
between the management and employees. Company rules and regulations are to
Table 7. Comparison of Industrial Relation between the Local and Foreign Companies
Table 8. Comparisons of HRM Practices between the Local and Foreign Companies
Firm’s country
of origin Bangladesh UK US
Recruitment Spend minimum money Spend more money Spend more money
and selection in selection. ‘Panel in selecting the right in selecting the right
interview’, aptitude employee. Managerial employee. Panel
tests, competency- level: advertise interview, aptitude
based interviews and externally; Professional/ tests, competency-
application forms are technical level: based interviews and
not commonly used advertise externally; application forms
for all levels Clerical/manual levels: are commonly used.
advertise externally, Clerical/manual
word of mouth, levels: advertise
reference externally, word of
mouth, reference
Training and Low in conducting Use both on the job More focused on the
development training needs and off the job training job training than off
systematically, less modality. But on the the job training
priority on-the-job job gets priority
training is practised
Compensation High in pay differentials High in pay differentials Individual
and benefits between those at between those at performance based
the top and those at the top and those at pay system with
the bottom. Non- the bottom. Team work experience.
monetary benefits are recognition, paid Success celebration,
less practised vacation, overseas paid vacation with
tours for mid and high family for talented
level employees performers
Performance Frequency: less used. Frequency: once a year. Frequency: formal
appraisal Measure of Measure of and systematic used.
performance: individual performance: individual Measure of
performance/output performance/output. performance:
Purpose: reluctant to Purpose: set personal individual
provide feedback objectives and review performance.
progress again past Purpose: provide
objects, give feedback feedback
to employee on their
performance
Management Informal criteria Individual performance Hard criteria such
appointments such as ‘emphasis on as ‘bottom line
criteria informal participation delivery’, ‘more
and group or like- than one business
minded involvement’, area’, ‘experience in
‘a cooperative group another country’
action’, loyalty’
Table 9. HRM Adaptation between Home and Host Country Effect in Foreign Companies
Table 10. The Effect of HRM Transfer between Home and Host Country in Foreign
Companies
Discussion
The results reveal that the three companies of this study are addressing the pri-
mary challenge of nurturing a committed workforce that is competent in fulfilling
organizational goals and continually exploring new ways to improve performance.
It is observed that the two foreign companies in Bangladesh have adopted a com-
bination of home and host country HRM practices. Both push and pull force fac-
tors are at play in the operation of garment companies in Bangladesh. In
determining strategic issues, expansion and reduction of workforces, push force is
at work. The pull force is exercised for ensuring compliance to the host country’s
practices in the process of HRM implementation. Like Japanese MNCs in US, US
MNCs in China (e.g., Farley et al., 2004), German MNCs in the UK (Ferner &
Varul, 1999), US MNCs in the UK (Ferner, Almond & Colling, 2005), UK and US
MNCs in RMG sector tend to accept a mixture of both home and host country
practices. The effect of home country is significant both in strategic and func-
tional areas of HRM practices. In terms of the primary HRM issues, the main
strategic decision-making depends on headquarters in UK and US, especially, on
issues such as workforce expansion and reduction. When subsidiary is important,
head quarter wants to keep operations under control rendering decisions from
home country. Moreover, Bangladesh is lacking high level HR professionals and
standardization of HRM practices.
It appears that MNCs, having their headquarters in UK and US adopt a ‘hybrid’
approach in managing their relationship with the local subsidiaries. UK and US
subsidiaries tend to comply with the home country practices, especially in the area
of recruitment and selection, performance appraisal, organizational communica-
tion, top management appointment criteria and participative management. Due to
strong pressure from the host country to conform with the local environment, the
subsidiaries were more influential in relation to decisions on compensation and
benefit, training and development, industrial relations and middle and lower man-
agement appointments criteria.
Institutional influences from the host country, such as legal environment and
utilization of local resources, are the priority for UK and US garment companies
in Bangladesh. Local practices such as reference checking are commonly used by
UK and US garment companies in Bangladesh. This suggests that due to the tight
budget and cost control over the subsidiaries, HR managers are sensitive to mini-
mizing recruitment costs. Results suggest that individual performance is widely
used for rewarding and promoting employees. The behaviour of MNCs in host
countries may be a blend or hybrid in which host country norms reconcile the
influence of the home country “blueprint” (Innes & Morris, 1995; Schuler &
Jackson, 1987), where both home country and host country effects account for the
measure of individual performance. Study results suggest that both individual per-
formance output and adoption of headquarter performance measure were com-
monly adopted in the foreign companies. An implication of choice of a modified
style is the influence of host country national culture, and accordingly, “the middle
way” approach has been implemented by the foreign companies in Bangladesh.
A few key factors seem to influence the foreign garment companies in develop-
ing the HRM policies internationally. There is an agreement that the transfer of
knowledge internationally is a key requirement for successful MNCs (Bartlett &
Ghoshal, 2000; Evans, Pucik & Barsoux, 2002; Mariappanadar, 2005; Poedenphant,
2002). Differences of opinion occur about factors that influence the adaptation
of HRM policies and practices from MNCs to MNC subsidiaries. A range of other
factors does impact transfer success and adaptation. These factors include the
impact of social, political, economic and strategic context. The pressures for global
integration versus local responsiveness and the evolving mentality MNCs are
facing (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 2000).
To respond to these challenges, the MNCs are obliged to develop global com-
petitiveness, multinational flexibility and worldwide learning capability. That is,
a cultural orientation towards learning, innovation and change is most likely to
result in more positive attitudes towards the transfer process, which may lead to
the eventual success of the MNCs (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1989; Herkenhoff, 2000;
Poedenphant, 2002). This effect is not practice specific, since it reflects character-
istics of the subsidiary that apply to all types of activities associated with learning,
innovation and change in general. Therefore, MNCs have a need to formally con-
trol and coordinate their subsidiaries. This outcome can be achieved through
reporting systems and targets, or less formally through relationships and the bonds
of corporate culture (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1989; Dowling, Schuler & Welch, 1987).
With these forms of control, trust between the involved parties is a key element
(Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1989).
In this study, we found that both US and UK garment companies are not adopt-
ing local HRM practices, but rather transferring headquarter influence to operate
business in Bangladesh. Assigning specialists in specific HR issues with global
responsibility, such as a top management appointment, as occurs in UK and US
cases, undermines the opportunity of the assigned specialist to develop personal
relationships or a deep understanding of a country or region (Adler, 2001; Dowling
et al., 1999). The Asian subsidiaries regard the assigned headquarter specialist as
effective, which suggests that the formal control mechanism does work well. This
renders the HR headquarter staff assigned to the subsidiary virtually powerful and
with parent country effect (Dowling et al., 1999; Evans et al., 2002). The parent
company trains the local employees to implement headquarter developed training
practices to have some level of control on the quality of the work and employee
performance.
References
Adler, N. (2001). International dimensions of organisational behavior (4th ed.). Cincin-
nati, OH: South Western College Publishing.
Adler, N., & Ghadar, F. (1991). Strategic human resource management: A global perspec-
tive. In R. Pieper (Ed.), Human resource management: An international comparison
(pp. 235–259). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Almond, P., Edwards, T., & Clark, I. (2003). Multinationals and changing business systems
in Europe: Towards the shareholder value model. Industrial Relations Journal, 34(5),
430–445.
Awasthi, V.N., Chow, C.W., & Wu, A. (2001). Cross-cultural differences in the behavioral
consequences of imposing performance evaluation and reward systems: An experi-
mental investigation. The International Journal of Accounting, 36(3), 291–309.
Bae, J., Shyh-jer, C., & Lawler, J.J. (1998). Variations in human resource management in
Asian countries: MNC home-country and host-country effects. The International Jour-
nal of Human Resource Management, 9(4), 653–670.
Banai, M. (1992). The ethnocentric staffing policy in multinational corporations: A self
fulfilling prophecy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(3),
451–472.
Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association. (BGMEA) (2012). Re-
trieved September 2013 from http://www.bdyellowbook.com/catalog/Garments_
Accessories/Garments_Composite_ Textile_Industries/Bgmea-info17798.html
Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: Transnational solution.
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
———. (2000). Transnational management: Text, cases and readings in cross-broader
management (3rd ed.). Boston: Irwin-McGraw Hill.
Beechler, S., & Yang, J. (1994). The transfer of Japanese-style management to American
subsidiaries: Contingencies, constraints and competencies. Journal of International
Business Studies, 25(3), 467–492.
Brewster, C., & Scullion, H. (1997). A review and agenda for expatriate HRM. Human
Resource Management Journal, 7(3), 32–41.
Budhwar, P., & Sparrow, P. (2001). An integrative framework for determining India and British
HRM practices: An empirical study. Management International Review, 38(2), 105–121.
Chow, C.W., Harrison, G.L., McKinnon, J.L., & Wu, A. (2000). The organisational, culture
of public accounting firms: Evidence from Taiwanese local and US affiliated firms.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(5), 347–361.
Chow, C.W., Shields, M., & Wu, A. (1999). The importance of national culture in the de-
sign of preference for management controls for multinational operations. Accounting,
Organizations and Society, 24(5–6), 441–461.
Dedousis, V. (1994). The core workforce-peripheral workforce dichotomy and the
transfer of Japanese management practices. In N. Campbell, & F. Burton (Eds),
Japanese multinationals: Strategies and management in the global Kaisha. London:
Rutledge.
Dowling, P.J., Schuler, R.S., & Welch, D.E. (1999). International human resource manage-
ment: Managing people in a multinational context (p. 314). South-Western College
Publishing, Cincinnati.
Edwards, T. (1998). Multinationals, labor management and the process of reverse dif-
fusion: A case study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4),
696–709.
———. (2004). The transfer of employment practices across borders in multinational
companies. In A.W. Harzing, & J.V. Ruysseveldt (Eds), International human resource
management (pp. 389–410). London: SAGE.
Edwards, T., & Ferner, A. (2004). Multinationals, reverse diffusion and national business
systems. Management International Review, 24(1), 51–81.
Evans, P., Pucik, V., & Barsoux, J.L. (2002). The global challenge: Frameworks for IHRM.
New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Farley, J.U., Hoenig, S., & Yang, J.Z. (2004). Key factors influencing HRM practices of
overseas subsidiaries in China’s transition economy. International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 15(4–5), 688–704.
Ferner, A. (1997). Country of origin effects and HR in multinational companies. Human
Resource Management Journal, 7(1), 19–37.
Ferner, A., Almond, P., & Colling, T. (2005). Institutional theory and the cross national
transfer of employment policy: The case of ‘Workforce Diversity’ in US multination-
als. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 304–321.
Ferner, A., & Quintanilla, J. (1998). Multinationals, national business systems and HRM:
The enduring of national identity or a process of ‘Anglo-Saxonisation’. The Interna-
tional Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4), 710–731.
Ferner, A., & Varul, M.Z. (1999). The German way: German multinationals and human
resource management. London: Anglo-German Foundation.
Gamble, J. (2003). Transferring human resource practices from the United Kingdom to
China: The limits and potential for convergence. The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 14(3), 369–387.
Glover, L., & Wilkinson, A. (2007). Worlds colliding: The translation of modern manage-
ment practices within a UK based subsidiary of a Korean-owned MNC. The Interna-
tional Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(8), 1437.
Guest, D., & Hoque, K. (1996). National ownership and HR practices in UK Greenfield
Sites. Human Resource Management Journal, 6(4), 50–75.
Hamill, J. (1992). Employment effects on changing multinational strategies in Europe.
European Management Journal, 10(3), 334–340.
Hannon, J., Huang, I., & Jaw, B. (1995). International HR Strategy and its determinants:
The case of subsidiaries in Taiwan. Journal of International Business Strategies, 26(3),
531–554.
Haque, M. (2013, 13 January). Businesses not in favour of FDI in basic RMG sector:
Chinese FDI encouraged in high-end products. New Age Online. Retrieved Septem-
ber 2013 from http://www.newagebd.com/detail.php?date=2013-01-13&nid=36539.
UUyuBVd5d8Q
Harzing, A. (2004). Composing in international staff. In A. Harzing, & J. Ruysseveldt
(Eds), International human resource management (2nd ed.), (pp. 251–282). London:
SAGE Publications.
Heenan, D.A., & Perlmutter, H.V. (1979). Multinational organization development.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Herkenhoff, L. (2000). National remuneration preferences: Cultural analysis within the
Hofstede model (PhD thesis). University of Western Australia, Perth, WA.
Hillman, A., & Wan, W.P. (2005). The determinants of MNE subsidiaries political strate-
gies: Evidence of institutional duality. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3),
322–340.
Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Manage-
ment Review, 7(1), 81–95.
Huang, T. (2000). Human resource management practices at subsidiaries of multinational
corporations and local firms in Taiwan. International Journal of Selection and Assess-
ment, 8(1), 22–28.
Innes, E., & Morris, J. (1995). Multinational corporations and employee relations: Con-
tinuity and change in a mature industrial region. Employee Relations, 17(6), 25–42.
Koh, Anthony C., Gammoh, Bashar S., & Okoroafo, Sam C. (2014). An investigation of
export practices and performance across global. International Business Research, 7(1),
60–72. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v7n1p60
Mahmood, M. (2004). The institutional context of human resource management: Case
studies of multinational subsidiaries in Bangladesh, Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of Manchester, UK.
Roche, W., & Geary, J. (1996). Multinational companies in Ireland: Adapting to or di-
verging from national industrial relations practices and traditions? Irish Business and
Administrative Research, 17(1), 14–31.
Rosenzweig, P., & Nohria, N. (1994). Influences on human resource management prac-
tices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2),
229–251.
Schuler, R.S., & Jackson, S.E. (1987). Organisational strategy and organisational level as
determinants of human resource management practices. Human Resource Planning,
10(3), 125–141.
Tayeb, M. (1998). The competitive advantage of nations: The role of HRM and its socio-
cultural context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(2),
588–605.
Taylor, S., & Bechler, S. (1993). Human resource management system integration and ad-
aptation in multinational firms. In S. Prasad (Ed.), Advances in international compara-
tive management (Vol. 8, pp. 155–174). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Taylor, S., Beechler, S., & Napier, N. (1996). Toward an integrative model of strategic
international human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 21(4),
959–985.
Yeh, R. (1987). Management practices of Taiwanese firms: As compared to those of
American and Japanese subsidiaries in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,
8(1), 1–14.