Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Application 491
Application 491
VERSUS
5. The State…...……………………………………..……….Respondents
DETENUE
CONFINED AT:-
as under:-
Cont’d P/2
-: 2 :-
and his family members and was in the search of a chance to teach
them lesson.
along with his relatives each namely Khamiso S/o Ghulam Qadir
and Bahawal S/o Sadoro was present at his house when respondent
entered into the house of applicant and controlled over the applicant
party with deadly weapons and started to search the house of the
detenue along with her baby daughter namely Zarina aged about 06
Cont’d P/2
-: 3 :-
his relatives, therefore, the applicant and his relatives time to time
the detenue but the respondent No.4 all the time kept the applicant
and his relatives on hollow hopes and finally refused to return the
5/- That after refusal of the respondent No.4 for the return
respondent Nos. 2 & 3 and narrated them above facts and requested
them for recovery of detenue along with baby daughter Zarina but
the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 did not pay any heed to the applicant
party.
Applicant.
been filed.
Cont’d P/4
-: 4 :-
PRAYER
________________
APPLICANT
Ghotki:
DATED : -09-2013 ADVOCATE FOR APPLICANT
IN THE COURT SESSIONS JUDGE GHOTKI
Abdul Haleem………………………...………………………Applicant
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
3/- That what ever stated is true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Identified by me Deponent
Advocate