Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MM 6th Lab Report
MM 6th Lab Report
01)Title:
To determine the deflection of a cantilever beam subjected to concentrated load at free end and
compare it with the theoretical values.
02)Problem Statement:
The cantilever beams have vast applications based on engineering as well as domestic
applications. They are used to support a load or a structure especially in cantilever cranes. In
these scenarios the loading tends to bend the beam depending on nature of loading. The desired
working is to be performed under the normal circumstances that include proper limits of
allowable deflections and slope. For selecting a material to withstand the conditions inside that
limit of allowable slope and deflection we must have to determine first its slope and deflection.
03)Objective:
Measure the deflection of a cantilever beam.
Measure the slope of deflection of a cantilever beam.
To verify the experimental and theoretical results by graphical method.
04)Apparatus:
Deflection of beam apparatus
Hanger
Weights
Meter rod
Dial indicator
Vernier Calipers
05)Apparatus Figure:
Beam
Weights
Hanger
Figure 1: Apparatus
Apparatus contains a metal beam and two clamp unit supports upon which the beam is supported
for this experiment and hence the beam becomes of a fixed ended type.
06)Theory:
6.1) Beams:
A beam is a long and a straight horizontal piece with a uniform cross-section characterized by
the type of supports. These beams are used to support different type of loads. There are different
types of beams are available along with the different applied loads. [1]
6.1.1) Types of Beams:
Cantilever Beam:
The type of beam which is supported from a one fixed end and the other end is left freely. The
loading is done one the free end. This type of beam is used particularly in cantilever cranes. [1]
Overhanging Beam:
Considering the case of simply supported beam, if the load is applied beyond the support of
beam it is called overhanging beam. If the load is applied beyond the both supports of beam then
it will called as double overhanging beam. The overhanging beam is mainly encountered in a
floor beam that extends beyond the exterior wall of a building to provide support to a balcony.[1]
Continuous Beam:
When a beam is supported on more than two supports it is termed as continuous beam. This type
of beam is used when the distance between two supports is so large so that any major loading can
easily cause permanent deflection. To overcome this, the number of supports is increased. The
common example of continuous beam is long bridges which are supported on more than two
supports. [1]
Uniformly Distributed Load: Load spread along the length of the Beam. To overcome the
complexity in calculations, we can convert the distributed load to point load by taking
summation of all loads applying on beam and the collective load is then taken on center of
beam as a point load. [2]
Bending moment of a cantilever beam is maximum if the load is applying on the edge of end
while for the simply supported beam it is maximum at the center of beam due to largest moment
arm for both ends. [3]
6.4) Sign conversion for Shear force and bending moment
Figure 12: Point load W acting at free end of cantilever beam [4]
The force of this W at the end will cause the beam to bend and deflect from its natural position.
In the below diagram the blue beam is the original position, and the dotted line simulates the
cantilever beam deflection: [4]
Figure 14: Deflection and slope of a cantilever beam subjected to load at free end [5]
07)Procedure:
1. Set the Deflection of Beam apparatus on a horizontal surface.
2. Set the dial indicator at zero.
3. Apply a load of 0.5 lb and measure the deflection using dial indicator.
4. Take a set of at least five readings of increasing value of load and then take readings on
unloading.
5. Calculate:
a. The “Theoretical value of deflection (yc)” of beam at mid-span.
b. The %age error between theoretical and experimental values of central
deflections.
08)Observations and Calculations:
Least Count of the dial indicator = 0.01mm
Least Count of vernier calipers = 0.01mm
Effective length of beam (L) =17.5 in
Breadth of beam (b) =1.037 in
Moment of inertia of the beam (I=bh3/12) =1.67×10-3in 4
Modulus of Elasticity (E) =29×10 6 psi
Height of beam (h) = 0.14 in
Actual Central Deflection-δc Theoretical Percentage
Load- (mm) Deflection yc = Error
No. of WL3/3EI
W
Obs. Loadin (mm) (%)
(lbs) Unloading Average
g
1. 0 0 0.014 0.014 0
2. 0.1 0.020 0.044 0.032 0.0293 9.215
3. 0.2 0.054 0.077 0.0655 0.0701 3.02
4. 0.3 0.093 0.114 0.1035 0.1001 1.17
5. 0.4 0.128 0.147 0.1375 0.1327 0.28
6. 0.5 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.1613 0.78
Table 1 Calculation of deflection and slope of Cantilever Beam
09)Sample Calculations:
yc = WL3/3EI
yc= (0.1)(17.5)3/3(29×106)( 1.67×10-3)
yc= 0.0293
Vobserved - Vtrue
Percent Error =
Vtrue
0.032 - 0.0293
=
0.0293
0.0027
=
0.0293
= 9.2150170648464%
10)Graphs:
Error Curve
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Experimental Theoretical
0.5
Deflection (MM)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18
Load (lbs)
11)Graph Explanation:
The graph shows that as load is applied, it follows linear deformation. Modulus of elasticity of
cantilever beam can be determined by this set of apparatus. The deflection depends upon the
amount of load applied on it. Graph shows that the deflection of cantilever beam changes as
magnitude of concentrated load varies. The experimental and theoretical values show how the
beam behaves under different loading conditions.
12)Conclusion:
As we concluded, that if we increase the weight on hanger the deflection is also increased in that
cantilever beam on apparatus. We can also find the modulus of that beam by taking the slope of
Load and deflection curve. As we decrease the loading there is also some change in measurement
on dial indicator that is due to residual stresses in beam that will remove after sometime. The
experimental and theoretical values show how the beam behaves under different loading
conditions.
13)Comments:
The evaluation of modulus of elasticity of cantilever beam can be determined by this set
of apparatus. However, to reduce the probability of error we should have to perform the
experiment more carefully. Also there is a suggestion to calibrate the gauge and there
should be a notch between the needle of gauge and load clamping unit surface so that the
needle could not be displaced while performing the experiment. This experiment is quite
reliable and easy to perform and results obtained are quite relevant. However, there is a
deviation of results this may be due to:
Poor readings taken from the Vernier caliper.
The apparatus may not be exactly horizontal.
Hanger may not be exactly at the middle point.
Our error can be decreased if we make a notch at point where pin of dial indicators are
attached.
There may exist the parallax error due to poor skills of observer while taking readings from the
dial indicator.
14)Refrences:
[1] https://www.mechanicalbooster.com/2016/09/types-of-beams.html
[2] http://www.mecha-engineeringbd.com/2016/06/types-of-load-in-beam.html
[3]
https://www.mem50212.com/MDME/MEMmods/MEM30006A/Bending_Moment/Bending_Mo
ment.html
[4] https://testbook.com/physics-formulas/beam-deflection-formula
[5] https://www.hkdivedi.com/2017/06/slope-and-deflection-of-cantilever-beam.html