Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LD Final Exam Paper
LD Final Exam Paper
Emma H. Hinzman
December 8, 2022
2
For Down Syndrome children, what is the effect of the Broad Target Speech Recast
treatment on speech and language improvement? This PICO question will be addressed
throughout this paper. First, we will begin talking about the client to which this research
originates. Everett is a 6-year-old boy in first grade with Down Syndrome. He receives speech
therapy three times a week for 30 minutes, which began one year ago. At this point in therapy,
Everett is working with the Speech-Language Pathologist to formulate and put together phrases
with his Augmentative Communication device (Paul et al., 2018). His genetic disorder causes
combination of sign language, verbal speech, gestures, and his speech-generating device.
According to the textbook, sign language encourages oral communication in children (Paul et al.,
2018). Everette uses the NovaChat 8 speech-generating device, which is the Augmentative and
Alternative Communication that helps him to learn and use vocabulary while improving his
overall communication skills. Language goals in treatment for Everett include being able to
retain 2-3 new vocabulary words with 95% accuracy in application, and ultimately being able to
produce 4-5 word utterances at a 90% accuracy. Speech goals include producing the final
consonant position sounds /d/ and /n/ with 90% accuracy given the opportunity. Everett is in the
developing language Brown Stage. Because his genetic disorder causes speech intelligibility it is
Fundamentals Preschool Second Edition (CELF -2). The Preschool Language Assessment
Instrument Second Edition would assess Everett’s ability to use and understand language. It
would be able to measure if he can apply and integrate pragmatics into everyday communication,
while the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Preschool Second Edition would assess
all five areas of language including phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics.
This intervention plan has 2 main parts and focuses on recasting. The textbook talks
about targets that are selected based on research of that language group, with recasting being one
of the targets (Paul et al., 2018). The two types of recasting are speech recast and grammatical
recast. These types of recast are never used in the same session as only one should be targeted at
a time (Camarata et al., 2006). Conversational recasting can shape a child’s expressive language
into a more complex version (Martin et al., 2009). The first part of this Broad Target Speech
Recast includes familiar games and activities where the Speech-Language Pathologist will ask
the child questions related to their actions, which encourages the child to talk (Vanderbilt
Kennedy Center, 2015). Whenever the child uses a mispronounced word that the therapist can
understand, recast will then play its role (Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, 2015). For example, if
Everett says, “Jump toe,” the therapist would say “Yes, the toad jumps.” When the speech
therapist uses a developmentally appropriate recast that is immediately followed by the child’s
mispronounced utterance, the child can note “the difference between her production and the
adult’s, which leads to support language acquisition” (Cleave et al., 2015). Down Syndrome
children with high imitation skills before treatment benefited from the Broad Target Speech
treatment plan would be incorporated with the use of his NovaChat 8 speech-generating device.
For example, it would be modified to relate verbal speech, sign, and his device and recasting
from there. If Everette said, “like cats,” on his device, the Speech-Language Pathologist would
then recast back with “Yes. You like cats.” Everett is able to use his device, gestures, sign, or
verbal speech, and the Broad Target Speech recast is able to continue its position. This
intervention is able to integrate his device while also encouraging verbal speech at the same time.
By adding to the phrase they used, recast plays a role in increasing expressive language in time.
The program is not exclusive to only verbal speech, stimulating all methods of Everett’s
communication. The inclusion quality of the program is beneficial to the Down Syndrome child
with good imitation skills like Everett. According to an article by Assistive Ware, the “use of
speech is often more successful when it’s supported with an AAC system” (AssistiveWare,
2022).
Treatment Findings
Research and multiple studies found that the Broad Target Speech Recast treatment was
most effective for children who already had good imitation skills when they entered treatment,
however, it also found that Down Syndrome children who entered treatment with low imitation
skills developed stronger imitation skills that where they were at previously, (Yoder et al., 2015)
and these speech recasts were credited to those results (Yoder et al., 2016). In comparison to
another treatment called Easy Does It for Articulation, Yoder said, “For kids with Down
syndrome who begin therapy at just above the mean for imitation ability, our results indicate that
speech recasting works better than EDI” (Marketing, 1970). Expressive language skills are
5
increased due to recasts. These recasts have been found to encourage communication, regardless
of the form. Through the treatment intervention, it has been found that Down Syndrome
children’s speech and language can be improved. In conclusion, speech recasts would help a
Down Syndrome child similar to Everett because they are learning from comparison to the recast
and their incorrect pronunciation. Also, the child is not required to try working to comprehend
the adult’s speech recast because it isn’t a different meaning (Schuele & Young, 2017).
6
References
AssistiveWare. (2022). Will AAC stop a person from learning to speak? AssistiveWare. Retrieved
https://www.assistiveware.com/learn-aac/roadblock-aac-will-stop-a-person-from-learning
-to-speak
Camarata, S., Yoder, P., & Camarata, M. (2006). Simultaneous treatment of grammatical and
Cleave, P. L., Becker, S. D., Curran, M. K., Van Horne, A. J., & Fey, M. E. (2015). The efficacy
https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_ajslp-14-0105
Marketing, C. and. (1970, April 17). Peabody Faculty Pioneer Down Syndrome speech and
https://news.vanderbilt.edu/2015/04/17/peabody-faculty-pioneer-down-syndrome-speech-
and-learning-interventions/
Martin, G. E., Klusek, J., Estigarribia, B., & Roberts, J. E. (2009). Language Characteristics of
https://doi.org/10.1097/tld.0b013e3181a71fe1
7
Paul, R., Norbury, C., & Gosse, C. (2018). Chapter 4 . In Language disorders from infancy
through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and Communicating (5th ed.,
Paul, R., Norbury, C., & Gosse, C. (2018). Chapter 9 . In Language disorders from infancy
through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and Communicating (5th ed.,
Paul, R., Norbury, C., & Gosse, C. (2018). Chapter 9 . In Language disorders from infancy
through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and Communicating (5th ed.,
Paul, R., Norbury, C., & Gosse, C. (2018). Chapter 9 . In Language disorders from infancy
through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and Communicating (5th ed.,
Quinn, E. D., Kaiser, A. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2020). Teaching preschoolers with down syndrome
https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_ajslp-19-0017
Yoder, P., Woynaroski, T., Camarata, S., & Bush, C. (2015, August). An effective speech therapy
method for school-aged children with ... - VUMC. School-Aged Children with Down
https://vkc.vumc.org/assets/files/resources/yoderdsreport15.pdf
8
Yoder, P. J., Camarata, S., & Woynaroski, T. (2016). Treating Speech Comprehensibility in
Students With Down Syndrome. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research :