Criteria to evaluate the project work and decide the grade in the CMS course

(Please rate the report/project work against each criterion below in the table on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is the best score. In the case of the sections with
subsections, i.e., 2 and 5, the average score of the subsections is to be used)

Grading
The criteria for grading* of the project: (Example, you fill in the table in the next page based on this example)
Nr. Criterion Score Score Score Score Score

1 The project idea is innovative and has a clear link to the CMS implementation 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 1-2
2 The project work covered all four pillars of CMS (Use the average score of subsections 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 1-2
and 2.4)
2.1 The business model pillar is considered adequately
2.2 The product design pillar is considered adequately
2.3 The supply chain pillar is considered adequately
2.4 The ICT pillar is considered adequately
3 The consideration of the system perspective is clear 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 1-2
4 The project has clear impacts in terms of resource conservation and waste minimisation 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 1-2
5 The economic and environmental performance analysis is done adequately (Use the average score 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 1-2
of subsections 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3)
5.1 The assumptions are clear and reasonable
5.2 Demonstrated clearly where to improve in order to improve the economic and environmental
performance
5.3 The analysis is sufficiently in-depth
6 The report is well structured and the red thread is evident 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 1-2
7 The report is well-written 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 1-2
Total 28-35 21-27 14-20 10-13 7-9
*Grade A B C D E
* In some cases, clear distinctions may become difficult to draw. In those cases, the teachers will collectively decide the grade.
 The grade for the opponent team
Group name MICHAIL LERIOU
Grading
The criteria for grading* of the project:
Nr. Criterion Score Score Score Score Score
1 The project idea is innovative and has a clear link to the CMS implementation 3.6
2 The project work covered all four pillars of CMS (Use the average score of subsections 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 4.6
and 2.4)
2.1 The business model pillar is considered adequately 5
2.2 The product design pillar is considered adequately 4
2.3 The supply chain pillar is considered adequately 4.5
2.4 The ICT pillar is considered adequately 5
3 The consideration of the system perspective is clear 4.6
4 The project has clear impacts in terms of resource conservation and waste minimisation 3.4
5 The economic and environmental performance analysis is done adequately (Use the average score 3
of subsections 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3)
5.1 The assumptions are clear and reasonable 2.5
5.2 Demonstrated clearly where to improve in order to improve the economic and environmental 3
performance
5.3 The analysis is sufficiently in-depth 3.4
6 The report is well structured and the red thread is evident 4.8
7 The report is well-written 5
Total 29 (A)
*Grade A (28-35) B (21-27) C (14-20) D (10-13) E (7-9)

* In some cases, clear distinctions may become difficult to draw. In those cases, the teachers will collectively decide the grade.

WEAKNESS
1st
How will you know where the clients will be?
And if you rent to many where houses it will not be financially viable.

2nd
In a service-oriented proposition (especially when referring to B2C) the product will be teared apart since the customers will not have a sense of ownership.
How are you going to deal with that? If you are going to charge them? will you be still a viable choice for your customers?
If they are going to pay more (since some furniture are going to be destroyed) why not buy plastic ones from another store?

3rd
You haven’t calculated your expenditure. how much money will you need for:
 1) Workers
2) Infrastructure (machinery)
3) Renting
4) Logistics
5) Raw material
6) Website
7) App

You need to be sustainable and from an economical perspective otherwise you are not a feasible choice.

4th too little references

Strength

1) Well written report, understandable

2) Good structure
3) Well organised and explained of the
Business model, supply chain, product design and the ict .

4) It’s a really good idea of CMS implementation.

5) The fact that you tried for modularity is vital for (cms implementation)
6) Use of new technologies ( nfc , qr code , website , app) for a more sustainable proposal
7) Very analytic with the supply chain
8) Elegant pictures (Business model canvas , product design and website )