Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Антиплагиат Курумбаева Адель Англ
Антиплагиат Курумбаева Адель Англ
Master's Thesis
Astana 2023
KAZAKH AGROTECHNICAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY NAMED AFTER
S. SEIFULLIN
Technical Faculty
Technological equipment and machinery department
Approve:
Head of Department ______________
Userbaev MT
Master's Thesis
Supervisor:
Candidate of Technical Sciences,
senior lecturer Mendalieva S.I.
Astana 2023
2
Content
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER 1 ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF PLASMA COATINGS
FOR THE RECOVERY OF THE IMPACT CAMSHAFT ...................................... 7
1.1 Analysis of the operating conditions and reasons for the failure of the high-
pressure fuel pump camshaft ................................................................................... 7
1.2 Coating materials ............................................................................................. 11
1.3 Feasibility study of coating methods ................................................................ 13
1.4 The state of the scientific and methodological basis in the field of optimization
of technological processes for the application of coatings by thermal spray .......... 16
CHAPTER 2 DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR THE STUDY OF
PLASMA COATING PROCESSES...................................................................... 20
2.1 Development of a mathematical model for the calculation of the technological
modes of plasma projection of materials with high thermal conductivity ............... 20
2.2 Model for criteria-based evaluation of technical and technological capabilities
of plasma coating methods .................................................................................... 30
2.3 Development of a methodology for the calculation of the parameters of the
technological process of applying plasma coatings ................................................ 35
CHAPTER 3 METHODS OF EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE
PROPERTIES OF PLASMA COATINGS ............................................................ 39
3.1 Particle temperature measurement technique ................................................... 39
3.2 Method to study the strength of adhesion of coatings....................................... 40
3.3 Coating Hardness Test Method ........................................................................ 43
3.4 Method for measuring the porosity of coatings ................................................ 44
3.5 Method for testing surface layers for abrasive wear ......................................... 45
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES AND THEIR
ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 46
4.1 Study of the energetic and thermal characteristics of the plasma torch ............. 46
4.2 Investigation of the influence of plasma spray modes on the properties of
coatings ................................................................................................................. 47
4.3 Investigations of the adhesion strength of coatings .......................................... 53
4.4 Microstructure Investigation ............................................................................ 56
4.5 Study of the hardness of coatings and porosity of the superficial layers ........... 60
4.6 Surface layer tests for abrasive wear ................................................................ 61
CHAPTER 5 PRACTICAL APPLICATION AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF
RESEARCH RESULTS ........................................................................................ 64
5.1 Methodology for choosing the method, material and deposition modes of
multifunctional coatings ........................................................................................ 64
5.2 Evaluation of the economic efficiency of the technological process of
restoration and tempering of pieces by plasma coating .......................................... 64
CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................... 66
BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................. 68
3
SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
4
INTRODUCTION
5
The practical meaning of work. Consists of the development of resource-saving
technologies that allow the restoration of the high-pressure fuel pump camshaft through
the plasma deposition method of wear-resistant and anti-friction coatings with
improved physical, mechanical and operational properties.
Methodology and research methods. In the work, theoretical and experimental
research methods were used. The theoretical problems were solved using the methods
of physical, mathematical modeling and mathematical statistics.
Provisions of the thesis presented for defense.
1. Mathematical model for the calculation of the modes of plasma projection of
materials with high thermal conductivity.
2. Resource-saving technologies for high-pressure fuel pump camshaft restoration
using the method of plasma deposition of anti-friction and wear-resistant coatings.
Publications.1 article was published on the topic of the thesis work.
Structure and scope of work. The dissertation consists of an introduction, five
chapters, a conclusion, a list of references and appendices. The work is presented on
70 pages, including 33 figures, 13 tables.
6
CHAPTER 1 ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF PLASMA COATINGS
FOR THE RECOVERY OF THE IMPACT CAMSHAFT
1.1 Analysis of the operating conditions and reasons for the failure of the high-
pressure fuel pump camshaft
8
Figure 1.1 - The process of plasma spraying the camshaft of the injection pump
Figure 1.2 - A set of tools for installing and fixing the plunger
9
The position of the pusher latch is such that the catalog number indicated on the
pusher body is at the top and the 0 marking on the rotating portion of the latch is at the
bottom. Install and remove tappet stops on fully depressed cams to prevent breakage
of the stops.
The camshaft should be installed as shown in Figure 1.3
Figure 1.3 - The position of the camshaft cams when installing and removing the
tappet stops
10
Figure 1.4 - Installation of the injection pump camshaft [5]
It should be noted that in the injection pump shown in the photo, it is more
expedient to remove and install the camshaft from the regulator side. Many models use
tapered bearings, so the camshaft must be removed from the front of the injection pump
after removing the front KV bearing cover.
The removal and installation of the camshaft in the injection pump housing [5]
must be carried out with a press or light blows through a copper or aluminum adapter.
It is recommended that all impact work be carried out with rubber hammers.
Based on the analysis of the operating conditions, the nature of the loads and the
causes of failure of units and parts of agricultural machinery and food processing
equipment, it is possible to identify the types of coatings that are most appropriate to
use to restore and strengthen these parts.
Figure 1.5 shows the main types of coatings currently used in industry [4]. To
solve the problems of restoration and strengthening of the camshaft of the high-
pressure fuel pump [6], the most relevant is the use of wear-resistant, anti-friction and
erosion-resistant coatings.
11
Figure 1.5 - The main types of industrial coatings
12
Figure 1.7 - Requirements for antifriction coatings
Nowadays, gas thermal methods to obtain coatings are of great interest, namely:
gas flame, detonation, high velocity and plasma projection [7].
Flame spray (Figure 1.8), in addition to the low cost of the resulting coatings, it
has a number of disadvantages: low adhesion strength of the coatings to the base
material (for example, for NiAl it is 22 MPa); the thermal efficiency of the gas jet is
quite high (0.8–0.9); however, the effective efficiency of heating dust particles does
not exceed 0.15; low mechanical properties of coatings; the impossibility of
pulverizing materials with a melting point higher than 2800 K [7].
13
Figure 1.8 - General diagram of flame spraying
The advantages of detonation spraying (Figure 1.9) are: the possibility of applying
any type of coating with low porosity (less than 1.5-2%); The coatings have a high
adhesion strength to the substrate (up to 250 MPa.
At the same time, this method has the following disadvantages: high cost of
coatings; the operation of detonation facilities is accompanied by loud noise (140 dB
or more); the need to use sealed boxes and remote control of the process [7].
High speed spray (Figure 1.10) has the following advantages: high coating
density; high adhesive strength of the coating; minimal structural and phase changes in
coating and substrate; relatively low temperature effect on the substrate and coating;
high performance of the process [7].
14
Figure 1.10 - General scheme of high-speed deposition
Plasma spray (Figure 1.11) has the following advantages: the ability to apply
coatings of almost any material on any substrate. The main disadvantage of the method
is the relatively low bond strength to the base, compared to blast coatings [7].
Over the past two decades, there has been a leap in the development of technology
and technology for thermal spraying in the world, while the share of plasma
technologies in the total volume of coating methods used in the world is more than 50
%, and this share continues to grow steadily.
The results of the analysis of the technical and economic indicators of the methods
allow us to conclude that in order to solve the problems of restoration and strengthening
15
of the camshaft of the high-pressure fuel pump [7], plasma spraying using air as
plasma- forming and transporting gases is of great interest.
1.4 The state of the scientific and methodological basis in the field of
optimization of technological processes for the application of coatings by
thermal spray
The current world level and the rate of development of science, engineering and
technology have very significantly changed the approach of engineers, researchers and
technologists to obtain, study, store and work with information. Currently, the engineer
is in a constant choice of the following alternatives: the depth of engineering
knowledge; breadth of specialization and areas of engineering knowledge; the
relevance of engineering knowledge and its conformity with the world level in this
field. At the same time, it is almost impossible to maintain a high level in all three
indicators without the use of special modern means of working with information.
One of the most popular and widespread modern means of working with
information are computer databases and knowledge bases. Currently, many specialized
databases have been developed, exist and are maintained. An engineer works with them
in 3 main ways:
1. Work directly with a database located on stationary media (hard drive, CD-ROM,
flash card, etc.) using a database management system.
2. Work directly with the database located on the company's local network or on the
global information network (Internet). An example of a web-hosted engineering
database containing information on over 83,000 different materials (metals, alloys,
non-metals, composites, etc.).
3. Work with various engineering programs that use databases for calculations.
Example: software systems for the automation of engineering calculations Ansys,
Comsol Multiphysics, Solid Works, etc.
The need to develop specialized electronic databases and knowledge bases to
solve technological problems in the field of thermal spraying was first demonstrated in
1991–1992.
The analysis carried out from open sources showed the absence of specialized
databases and knowledge bases for the design of gas-thermal coatings and the
development of technology for their application. Therefore, at this time, the
development of a specialized and knowledge database that meets the requirements
described above is an urgent and practically valuable task. Until the mid-1990s, the
deposition process was controlled by the following iterative procedure: determination
of technological parameters, deposition, study of sample properties. This procedure
was repeated until samples with satisfactory characteristics were obtained, after which
the deposition modes were fixed. However, the spraying equipment is very sensitive to
wear and therefore, the application of this method does not allow to ensure the stability
and reproducibility of the properties of the coatings. The main task of CAD is to
increase the level of intellectual activity and productivity of the technologist, and its
use allows you to search for new promising and optimal technological and design
16
solutions aimed at improving the quality of machine parts, as well as reducing time.
and cost of developing technological processes. The following key elements are
required for the development and implementation of a complete CAD for thermal
coatings, and in particular plasma, and the technology for its application: and its use
makes it possible to search for new promising and optimal technological and design
solutions aimed at improving the quality of machine parts, as well as reducing the time
and cost of developing technological processes. The following key elements are
required for the development and implementation of a complete CAD for thermal
coatings and, in particular, plasma, and the technology for their application: and their
use makes it possible to search for new promising and optimal technological and design
solutions aimed at improve the quality of machine parts, as well as reduce the time and
cost of developing technological processes. The following key elements are required
for the development and implementation of a complete CAD for thermal coatings, and
in particular plasma, and the technology for its application:
1. An engineering technique that reflects the optimal scenarios for the
development of thermal gas coatings by a technologist and the technology for their
application.
2. Corresponding physical and mathematical models that describe all the
necessary stages of the engineering methodology.
3. Software and hardware that implements the corresponding mathematical
models and links them into a single CAD system that, through a convenient interface,
ensures that the technologist effectively goes through all stages of the engineering
methodology and, ultimately, the development of a thermal spray. coating and its
application technology.
In the course of the analysis of the situation in the world with CAD for thermal
spraying, no complete systems were found that allow the complete cycle of coating
design and development of the spraying process.
Analysis of existing physical and mathematical models. To obtain high-quality
coatings, it is necessary to accurately select the deposition parameters. A coating model
to calculate process parameters is a necessary tool to develop new coatings with the
desired properties. Most of the world's research is of a purely applied nature, while
modeling of the various stages of the deposition process and the entire process as a
whole affect more than 38% of all research in the world (Figure 1.12).
Figure 1.12 - The main directions of world research in the field of modeling of
thermal spray processes
17
An analysis of ongoing global studies has shown (Figure 1.13) that today, as 40
years ago, most of the models being developed are empirical in nature, the only
difference being that numerical modeling is used consistently. one way or another,
which is due to the rapid development of computer technology in the past 15 years.
Only 5% of the models created are analytical in nature. In this case, during the
simulation, 5 parameters that characterize the course of the spraying process are mainly
considered, presented in Figure 1.13.
Figure 1.13 - The main methods for modeling thermal projection processes in
the world
Figure 1.14 - The main parameters of the thermal spraying process, investigated
during the simulation
Currently, only a few works are presented in open foreign sources dedicated to
modeling the thermal spray process at all levels, from the formation of a hot jet to the
formation of a coating [7].
Among the Russian studies, the complex model of plasma spraying developed by
Prof. Puzryakov A.F., which describes all the stages of plasma spraying: from
modeling the characteristics of the plasma torch to modeling the properties of the
coatings obtained, allows us to obtain semi-empirical dependences of the basic
properties of the coating (P, KIM, SSC) on the basic parameters of spraying (I, G, C)
and is perhaps the only model practically applicable in engineering calculations. The
disadvantages of this model are its empiricism, as well as the complexity and
complexity of calculations
Several subsequent experimental data on the determination of the temperature and
velocity of particles in a plasma jet give reason to believe that particles of sprayed
18
materials with high thermal conductivity (metals, alloys, and intermetallic) are greatly
accelerated and heated in a jet. of plasma. faster than previously assumed in existing
mathematical models. The adoption of the position on shock acceleration and heating
of particles with high thermal conductivity in a plasma jet opens the possibility of
building a simplified and analytically solvable mathematical model for these particles.
An analysis of the volumes of materials used to strengthen and restore various parts
showed that in 80-90% of cases, materials with high thermal conductivity are used.
Analysis of existing specialized software. The analysis of domestic and foreign
sources revealed the practical absence in the world of specialized software suitable for
solving problems of hardening and restoration of parts by methods of gas-thermal and,
in particular, plasma spraying.
The design of the plasma spraying process is a big problem: the complexity of the
plasma torch design, the complexity
of mathematical modeling and the problems of the stability of the spraying process
require a large number of tests. Further improvement of the efficiency
of using plasma spraying is associated with the development of methods and
means of automation and computerization of the spraying process.
19
CHAPTER 2 DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR THE STUDY OF
PLASMA COATING PROCESSES
Due to the wide variety of various physical phenomena that occur during
deposition, the development of a complex mathematical and physical computational
model requires the modeling of three main sub-processes: the formation of a plasma
jet; interaction of particles with a jet; formation of coatings, as well as their mechanical
and thermodynamic properties.
An approach to model the formation of a plasma jet. The purpose of modeling
at this stage is to obtain the relationship between the energy and thermal characteristics
of the plasma torch and the specific enthalpy, velocity and temperature of the plasma
jet at the nozzle exit. Currently, there are three methods for modeling and calculating
a plasma torch: the theoretical method, the criterion method, and the empirical method.
The theoretical method consists in solving a system of equations, which includes:
the continuity equation, the motion equation, the energy equation, the Ohm's law
equation, the Maxwell equation and the equations of state. The disadvantages of this
method are the low accuracy of solving the given system of equations, as well as the
lack of methods for calculating the integral characteristics of the arc discharge. A
limitation in the use of this method is that it is, in fact, applicable only to laminar gas
flows, which are practically not used in plasma spray technology [7].
The criteria method is based on finding the criteria dependencies of geometrically
similar plasmatrons. In this case, a generalized current-voltage characteristic of the
criterion, thermal efficiency, is used, with the help of which the specific enthalpy is
calculated, and then 𝑇0 and 𝑣0 at the nozzle exit are determined. Disadvantages of the
method: the accuracy of voltage and thermal efficiency calculations does not exceed
20-40%, which is much lower than the accuracy of the empirical method and is
insufficient for engineering and technological calculations; the calculations do not take
into account the composition of the gas, further reducing the accuracy of the
calculations. The criterion method is mainly used to calculate high power plasmatrons.
The empirical method for calculating the plasma torch is that at various flow rates
and gas compositions for a particular plasma torch, the current-voltage characteristic
(CVC) is found. The advantage of the empirical method is the high accuracy of the
calculations (5-7% error). The disadvantages are the need for a specific plasma torch
and tests to determine the experimental coefficients. However, despite this, at present,
the empirical method for the calculation of the plasma torch is the only one objectively
suitable for technological calculations [7].
In addition, various approaches to modeling the process of plasma formation and
the formation of a plasma jet are given in the works.
The article shows that in order to calculate the temperature of the particles in a
plasma jet, it is necessary to calculate the following thermodynamic properties of the
20
gas mixture: density, heat capacity, specific enthalpy and the number of grams-moles
in 1 kg of gas. gas. In the course of calculating the transport properties of the plasma-
forming gas, its viscosity and thermal conductivity are determined.
An approach to model the interaction of particles with a jet.
The model to calculate the parameters of the particles in a plasma jet has proven
to be good; It has been shown that the velocity of the particles, depending on their
density and granulation and the velocity and density of the gas flow, can be
approximated by least squares. method by relation:
where 𝜌h, 𝑣h, 𝑑h are the density, velocity, and diameter of the particles,
respectively;
𝜌п, 𝑣п are the density and velocity of the plasma jet, respectively.
Expression (2.1) is applicable: for particles with a diameter of 50 to 200 µm; by
changing the density of the particles between 3,000 and 19,300 kg/m3; at a plasma jet
speed in the range of 400–1200 m/s; at a plasma jet density in the range of 0.034–0.05
kg/m3. In this case, expression (2.1) describes the experimental data with a mean
square error of 10.5%.
The temperature of the sprayed particles is found from the heat conduction
equation, which in the mathematical model for the calculation of particles with low
thermal conductivity, under the initial condition 𝑇 (𝑟, 0) = 𝑓(𝑟) has the form (2.2):
In the general case, the problem of calculating the temperature of the particles in
this formulation has no analytical solution, but it can be solved numerically using the
finite increment method, which complicates the development and optimization of
deposition process modes.
More recent field studies have shown that during plasma spray, particles are
accelerated in the plasma jet much faster than implied from the previous model, and
from the moment they enter the plasma torch, particles move at a constant speed
(instantaneous acceleration). The fact that the particles are accelerated in the initial
section of the jet is visible in the presented scanned photographs (Figure 2.1).
21
Figure 2.1 - Photo scans of a plasma jet with tungsten particles
22
Figure 2.2 - Stages of the plasma spray process when building a mathematical
model
23
𝐺1 and 𝐺2 are the flow rates of gas 1 and gas 2, which are part of the plasma gas
(for example, argon and nitrogen);
𝐺 = 𝐺1 + 𝐺2 – consumption of plasma gas.
𝑄 - heat losses from the plasma torch;
𝑎1, 𝑎2, 𝑎3, 𝑎4, 𝑎5, 𝑎6 are experimental coefficients that depend on the design of
the plasma torch. These coefficients are obtained in the course of experiments using a
specific plasma torch, which requires additional calculations of the modes of the
deposition process;
𝑐 - coefficient obtained experimentally;
𝑘1 and 𝑘2 are constants based on the design of the plasma torch.
Furthermore, according to thermodynamic dependencies, we find the universal
gas constant 𝑅0 = 𝑓 (𝐻ud0, 𝐶) and the temperature 𝑇0 = 𝑓 (𝐻ud, 𝐶) at the nozzle outlet.
The speed of the jet at the exit of the nozzle is determined by the expression (2.4):
where 𝑃 is pressure;
d is the diameter of the nozzle.
Modeling of thermal and dynamic parameters of a plasma jet. The length of
the initial span is determined by formula (2.5):
24
For argon-nitrogen plasma, expression (2.5) after approximation will take the
following form (2.9):
To determine the thermal conductivity of a gas mixture, you can use the
approximate formula (2.11):
The viscosity and thermal conductivity of pure argon and nitrogen, necessary for
the calculation of 𝜇cm and 𝜆cm, are determined by expression (2.12):
25
With plasma spray, 𝑅𝑒~102 – 103 [9], therefore, to determine 𝐶𝐷, we will use the
LS Klyachko dependency [9] (2.15):
For the initial section of the jet, the temperature 𝑇𝑔, 𝑊, 𝜈 and the density 𝜌𝑔 can
be taken as constant values. The condition 𝑊 ≫𝑉 is always fulfilled in the initial
section, so we can use the transformation (2.17):
since 𝑎 ∙ 𝛿⁄𝑏 = 1.
Then the expression (2.19) takes the form (2.20):
This relationship determines the change in the Reynolds numbers in the initial
section along the axis of the jet (2.21 and 2.22):
The more 𝑘, the faster the acceleration of the particle occurs, that is, the growth
𝑋, and the faster the decline 𝑌.
Relationship between time coordinates (2.23)
Fourier's test and the numbers 𝑋 and 𝑌 can be established using the original
equation (2.16). We obtain expressions (2.24) and (2.25), which are the analytical
solution of the equation of motion of particles in the initial section of the plasma jet:
27
Where 𝑆0 = 𝑊𝑡⁄𝐷 – Strouhal criterion; 𝑆0 = 𝑟 ∙ 𝑃𝑒0
𝑃𝑒0 = 𝑊 ∙ 𝐷⁄𝑎𝑝 is an analogue of Peclet's criterion.
To calculate the heating of the particles in the initial section, we use the following
relationship (2.25):
The index 𝑤 refers to the properties of the gas at the surface temperature of the
particle 𝑇𝑤. For temperatures 𝑇𝑤 = 1000 ... 3000 K, we can take 𝜆𝑤 = 𝑎1 + 𝑏1 ∙ 𝑇𝑤.
The equation for heating a thermally thin particle without taking into account
radiation heat transfer has the form (2.26):
Where 𝜃 = 𝑇⁄𝑇𝑚;
𝜃𝑔 = 𝑇𝑔⁄𝑇𝑚;
𝑇𝑚 is the melting point of the particulate material;
𝐴1 = 12𝑎1⁄𝜆𝑝;
𝐴 = 12𝑏1 ∙ 𝑇𝑚⁄𝜆𝑝;
𝐵 = 6𝐾 ∙ 𝜆𝑔⁄𝜆𝑝.
The Reynolds test 𝑌 according to (2.25) can be written as (2.27):
Going from the 𝑟-coordinate to the spatial coordinate 𝜁 = 𝑥⁄𝐷, expression (2.26)
becomes (2.28):
28
Considering the transformation
Where 𝛾 = 𝛽 + 𝐵√𝑅;
𝛿 = 𝐴 (𝜃𝑔 – 𝜃0);
𝛽 = 𝐴1 + 𝐴 ∙ 𝜃𝑔.
Figure 2.3 shows heating graphs of tungsten particles in the initial section of the
argon plasma jet, represented according to dependency (2.29). The heating curves
determined by the dependency (2.30) are also plotted there:
4000
3,500
3000
2500
2000
1500 5 6 7 9 10 11 12
x mm
Figure 2.3 - Heating graphs of tungsten particles in the initial section of the
argon plasma jet (𝑇𝑔 = 104 K, 𝑊 = 103 m/s)
1 (red) - 𝐷 = 30 µm, 2 (green) - 𝐷 = 60 µm, 3 (blue) - 𝐷 = 100 µm.
29
Solid lines: calculation according to (2.29), dashed lines: calculation according to
(2.30).
Thus, when calculating according to (2.30), the fusion of the particles 𝐷 = 30 μm
starts at a distance of about 3.5 mm from the point of entry to the jet, while according
to the proposed method, the moment when the temperature is reached fusion
corresponds to a distance of about 10 mm.
To build a criterion model, at the first stage, the most significant parameters are
selected for analysis from a set of parameters characterizing the technological cost of
coating, productivity and process reliability, on the basis of which the Criterion for the
economic efficiency of the deposition process is further formulated [10].
The given coating costs are (2.31):
30
The coefficient ηоі characterizes the reliability of the equipment and, ultimately,
the technological process, therefore it can be called the reliability coefficient.
Thus, we obtain the expression (2.33):
The first term (2.33) represents capital investments related to 1 hour of the actual
operation of the team fund, that is, specific capital investments. The second term is the
technological cost of 1 hour of operation of the equipment, that is, unit cost of
production per coating operation.
We will denote it by Coi.
Since the dependency (2.34) takes place:
which determines the unit costs to create a coating of the required thickness, or
the technological cost of the coating.
We get an expression forum generalized criterion for the economic efficiency of
spraying coatings, taking into account technological and operational indicators,
without taking into account the geometric characteristics of the coating (area fоі and
thickness tі) and normalizing the specific costs by the volume of the coating.
Substituting this relation into (2.35) gives (2.36):
31
The mathematical description of the criterion (2.37) allows to determine and
analyze the main technical, economic indicators and the technological characteristics
of the technological process of applying coatings that provide Qmax.
In order to select a rational coating application method with an evaluation of its
performance, a software package has been developed (Figure 2.4).
The basis of the software package information environment are the following
databases:
– working conditions to choose the coating material depending on the
temperature, chemical activity of the working medium, useful life, mechanical loads,
etc.;
- coating methods depending on the purpose of the coating, the characteristics of
the coating material and the base of the part, the required thickness, porosity, roughness
of the coating, processing temperature conditions and technical and economic
indicators;
- typical technological processes, products, areas of application, materials,
purpose of coatings, methods and modes of their application;
– applied wear resistant coating materials depending on their quantitative (density,
melting point, adhesion strength, etc.), qualitative (heat resistance, erosion resistance,
wear resistance, etc.), mechanical, thermophysical properties and special, purpose, and
operating characteristics.
Stage 1. Comparison of the developed technological process with existing
technical solutions. After analyzing the characteristics of the part, a database (DB) of
32
existing technological processes (TP) is used, the possibility of using the developed TP
is evaluated, as well as data from similar developments.
If a suitable TP is found, the system provides data on a typical TP, including
material grade, coating method, and parameters achieved. In the absence of an adequate
technological process, the system proceeds to the synthesis of a new one.
Stage 2. Selection of materials ("VIBMAT" module). From a large number of
materials, the most optimal for a particular part is selected.
The materials selection program considers the possibility of operating the material
in four types of work environment (oxidizing, neutral, abrasive, corrosive) acting on
the coating material with different intensities. The program allows selecting a material
subject to the condition Tp ≤ 0.8 Tm, where Tp is the operating temperature of the
coating; Tmelt is the melting temperature of the coating material.
Stage 3. Choice of coating method ("VIBTECHNO" module). The coating
method is selected based on technological feasibility and the economic cost of
manufacturing the coated part.
Stage 4. Selection of spray modes (modules "OPTIM 1", "OPTIM 2",
RASHETA). To select the modes, the objective function Fv, T is used, which must
be minimal for the modes that provide the specified cloaking properties (2.38):
Where TV, νset are, respectively, the temperature and the velocity of the particles
at which the required properties of the coatings are provided.
When searching for deposition modes of plasma coatings that satisfy condition
(2.38), the following constraints (2.39) are taken into account:
The restrictions in (2.39) on the technological parameters are taken into account
using the functions defined by the following expressions (2.40):
The minimization of the expression (2.38) taking into account (2.40) reduces to
finding the minimum of the function (2.41):
33
Outside the permissible range of regime change, the functions (2.40) significantly
exceed the value of expression (2.38), therefore, the minimum of the objective function
(2.41) will be in the range of permissible values of current and flow rates. gas and dust.
In this case, to select the modes, the temperature of the particles is calculated, which
gives the specified properties of the coating, and then the current consumption of arc,
gas and dust are determined, in which the particles of the material are heated to the
specified temperature.
By looking for the values of arc current, gas and dust consumption, providing a
given set of temperatures of the pulverized particles, the possibility of realizing the
minimum temperatures Тmin and maximum Тmax is verified (Figure 2.5). If this is not
possible, modes for intermediate values of particle temperatures are selected; if not, it
is concluded that the specified conditions are not realizable.
where λi, λe, λminх are equal to 0 if they are not used and 1 if they are used.
Stage 5. Coating tests are carried out to verify the correctness of the calculation
results and refine them to obtain their best characteristics.
34
Step 6. Save data ("PRINT" module). The program saves information in the
database and prints flowcharts for selected or developed technological processes. In
this case, the calculation results can be presented in the form of specific numerical
values, the desired parameters or factors, as well as functional dependencies, tables,
graphs, diagrams, etc.
37
currently, in fact, databases on materials for obtaining gas-thermal coatings. At the
same time, such databases reflect only the properties of the raw materials, which are
subjectively interpreted by the process engineer into the corresponding properties of
gas-thermal coatings [12].
38
CHAPTER 3 METHODS OF EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE
PROPERTIES OF PLASMA COATINGS
Figure 3.1 - Diagram of the device to separate particles from the jet The
temperature of the particles is found from expression (3.1):
39
Where 𝑇2h is the final temperature of the water in the calorimeter when particles
enter;
𝑀h is the mass of particles entering the calorimeter,
𝐶𝑝h is the specific heat of the particles,
𝐶𝑝k is the heat capacity of the calorimeter, which was previously determined
experimentally and calculated from expression (3.2):
Where 𝐶pore, 𝑀pore, 𝑇pore - heat capacity, mass and temperature of the
preheated powder;
𝑀cal, 𝑇start, 𝑇mouth – mass, initial temperature and calorimeter constant.
One of the most important parameters characterizing the quality of coatings is the
strength of adhesion. Existing methods for the experimental determination of the
adhesion strength of coatings [16] can be divided into two groups: quantitative and
qualitative. In the studies carried out in the framework of this work, two of the previous
methods are used: adhesive and pin.
Adhesive method for determining adhesion strength is shown in Figure 3.2
[16].
Figure 3.2 - Schemes for testing the adhesive strength of the coating by the
adhesive method:
40
1 - fastening pins; 2 - holder; 3 - glue; 4 - lining; 5 - sample
The calculation of the adhesion force is carried out according to the formula (3.3):
The uneven distribution of stresses over the cross—sectional area of the coating -
base joint, the simultaneous action of tangential and normal stresses in the coating
makes it necessary to analyze the stress state that occurs in the coating when it is
detached from the base. At the same time, it is necessary to study not only the limiting
state, but also the entire process of stress development in the coating as the loading
force increases. The study of this issue is crucial for a reliable assessment of the acc.
Pin method is shown in Figure 3.3 [17]. The condition for determining the
adhesion force can be written as inequality (3.4):
41
Where 𝑑 - diameter of the pin,
𝑏 - coating thickness,
𝑡 is the shear stress in the lining,
𝐺 is the stress of adhesive force of the coating.
When performing the tests, the samples and accessories shown in Figure 3.3 are
used.
Figure 3.3 - Scheme for determining the adhesive strength of plasma coatings by the
pin method: 1 - rod made of base material; 2 - steel bushing; 3 – sprayed layer; 4 -
bushing; 5 - split washer; 6 - union nut; 7 and 8 - details of the test machine.
42
3.3 Coating Hardness Test Method
Figure 3.4 - Scheme for determining hardness according to Brinell (a) and
Vickers (b)
43
where D is the diameter of the pressed ball, mm.
Vickers hardness determined according to GOST 2999-75. The hardness number
is calculated by formula (3.6)
44
3.5 Method for testing surface layers for abrasive wear
Chemical methods for determining the porosity of the coating are based on the
fact that solutions of a certain composition, penetrating through the pores of the coating
to the base metal of the part, react with it and form brightly colored reaction products.
Currently, there are many methods to determine the wear resistance of the surface
layers of parts [21].
Within the framework of this work, a technique is used that determines the
comparative resistance of coatings to abrasive wear during friction against non-rigidly
fixed abrasive particles according to GOST 23.208-79 [22].
The layout of the test setup is shown in Figure 3.5. A rubber-coated steel wheel is
rotated at 200 rpm and pressed against the sample with a force of 150 N, while loose
abrasive is fed between the wheel and the sample.
Weight loss is recorded after 2,000- and 6,000-wheel revolutions. The weight loss
obtained by this method is typically an order of magnitude greater than that of the
grinding wheel test and is suitable for abrasive wear testing of super wear resistant
coatings. Less wear resistant coatings can also be evaluated by the same method if the
load and number of revolutions are reduced.
45
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES AND THEIR
ANALYSIS
4.1 Study of the energetic and thermal characteristics of the plasma torch
In the framework of this work, a PUN-1M plasma torch is used for plasma
spraying. Air was chosen as the plasma gas. This plasma torch allows for the spraying
of plasma, using air as the forming gas and plasma carrier. The range of nominal modes
of operation of the plasma torch:
✓ air consumption, 𝐺: from 2.13 to 2.50 l/s;
✓ plasma gas pressure, 𝑃: from 160 to 440 kPa;
✓ arc current, 𝐼: from 120 to 250 A.
The tasks of the ongoing experimental study of the energy characteristics of the
plasma torch:
1. Determination of the current-voltage characteristic, in order to harmonize the ranges
of technological parameters of the plasma torch with the technical characteristics of
the power supply.
2. Determination of rational ranges, from the point of view of work efficiency
(efficiency), of the mode of operation of the plasma torch.
The experiments were carried out with fixed flow rates of cooling water at the
cathode and anode of the plasma torch, equal to 0.159 l/s and 0.093 l/s, respectively.
The specific heat capacity of water used in the calculations is 4200 J/kg∙K
. During the investigation, a total of 32 experiments were carried out. The plasma
torch operating parameters were measured at 8 values of arc current 𝐼 (120, 150, 170,
190, 200, 220, 240, and 250 A) for the following four pairs of supply parameters
(pressure 𝑃 and consumption 𝑄) of the plasma-forming gas (air):
1. 𝑃 = 1.6 kg/cm2 and 𝑄 = 2.13 l/s.
2. 𝑃 = 2.4 kg/cm2 and 𝑄 = 2.31 l/s.
3. 𝑃 = 3.4 kg/cm2 and 𝑄 = 2.37 l/s.
4. 𝑃 = 4.4 kg/cm2 and 𝑄 = 2.50 l/s.
During the experiments, the following indicators were measured:
– arc voltage 𝑈, V;
– tank water temperature 𝑇b, °C;
is the temperature of the water at the exit of the cathode 𝑇k, °C;
is the temperature of the water in the anode drain 𝑇a, °C;
Based on the experimental data obtained, the following indicators were
calculated:
– difference ∆𝑇k = 𝑇k − 𝑇b, °C;
– difference ∆𝑇а = 𝑇а − 𝑇b, °C;
– arc power 𝑃, kW;
– cathodic losses ∆𝑄k, kW;
– anode losses ∆𝑄а, kW;
– total losses ∆𝑄Σ, kW;
is the useful power of the jet 𝑃p, kW;
46
– Efficiency of the plasma torch 𝜂, %;
is the specific enthalpy of the plasma jet 𝐻sp, kJ/l.
The purpose of the research was to obtain a mathematical model to optimize the
controlled parameters of the technological process using the methods of planning
experiments. The task of selecting controlled parameters is to determine the significant
factors that determine the course of a certain technological process in order to then
control the properties of the resulting coatings [23].
The following have the greatest dependence on the average temperature of the
mass of the pulverized particles:
– porosity (P) – Figure 4.1;
- material utilization factor (KIM) - Figure 4.2;
- adhesion force of the coating with the base (𝜎sts) - Figure 4.3;
The adhesion strength of the coating also depends significantly on the diameter of
the powder piece and the spray distance (Figure 4.4).
Figure 4.1 – Dependence of the porosity values on the temperature of the particles
47
Figure 4.2 – Dependence of CMM values on particle temperature values
48
Figure 4.4 - Dependencies of adhesion force values on spray distance with a
particle diameter of 40, 60 and 90 microns (curves 1-3, respectively)
It has been established that the dependencies (4.1) and (4.2) within the
measurement error (15%) agree satisfactorily with the experimental data, and their
application for a given porosity allows to determine the required value of h. The
temperature of the particles, the porosity of the coating and the material utilization
49
factor are also used as input parameters in the modeling and search for optimal coating
modes [24].
In industry, in addition to powder plasma torches, plasma torches operating on
wire consumable material are also used. They create conditions for better heating and
a more uniform flow rate of sprayed particles, which leads to more dense and
homogeneous coatings. At the same time, powder plasma torches create opportunities
for a deeper variation in the composition and properties of the coatings obtained.
The flow rates of particles of sprayed materials observed in plasma torches usually
reach values of 40-250 m/s and create a pressure of about 50-100 MPa on the substrate
surface. The short time of active contact of particles with the substrate (10 5-10~7 s)
creates a temperature gradient along the coating thickness of 104 degrees/ mm.
This type of cooling contributes to a change in the properties of the sprayed
material, in particular, an increase in its hardness, and also causes an intense release of
gases that were dissolved in the molten particles and did not have time to stand out
during their rapid crystallization and transition to a solid state. Therefore, the residual
porosity of plasma-sprayed coatings reaches 5-15%. Sequentially, randomly
overlapping each other, the particles form a scaly layered coating with a strongly
pronounced anisotropy of properties (i.e., the difference in properties in different
directions).
The conditions of plastic deformation and thermal activation of the substrate
surface determine the amount of adhesion strength of the coating to the substrate.
In order to increase the adhesion strength, the surface of the part is subjected to
abrasive, mechanical or chemical treatment before coating. The adhesion strength of
plasma metal coatings with a metal substrate reaches 60 MPa, and sometimes 80 MPa.
The use of special sublayers of metals or ceramics (for example, molybdenum,
chromium oxide, etc.) with a thickness of about 10 microns contributes to increasing
the adhesion strength of the coating.
The adhesion strength can also be increased by adjusting the power of the plasma
torch and the spraying distance. Nevertheless, the adhesion strength of the plasma-
sprayed coating to the substrate is small and can be disrupted by internal residual
stresses in the coating material, which reach 7-15 MPa. For this reason, a layer of more
than 50-200 microns is usually not sprayed per pass. The total thickness of the coating
should not exceed its critical value (usually 1-5 mm).
The temperature of the substrate can be changed according to a certain law in
order to ensure a decrease in the temperature gradient over the thickness of the coating
(by heating to 373-673 K before and cooling during the spraying process).
Varying the technological parameters allows you to change the properties of
coatings in the right direction. There are other ways to improve the properties of
plasma-sprayed coatings, for example, vacuum annealing, surface melting, reduction
of bulk porosity by impregnation with various substances, etc.
To study the effect of spray modes on the properties of coatings, experimental
studies were carried out to determine their adhesion strength.
The adhesion strength of coatings to the base can be represented as a certain
function of controlled factors (4.4):
50
сц = f (Rz, n, I, g1, g2, C, L, D). (4.4)
A differentiated analysis of the relationship between each factor and the numerous
properties of the coatings is extremely complex. In this regard, the main groups of
factors that determine the complex of parameters and properties were formed.
Each group of factors reflects the phenomena that occur in the plasma spray
process:
- the first group of factors (energy) characterizes the state of the plasma jet - the
arc current I and the composition of the plasma gas C (in this case, air)
- the second group - the flow rate of the plasma gas g1 and the flow rate of the
pulverized material g2;
– the third group is the plasma jet spray cone, which depends on the design of the
plasma torch and the spray distance L;
- the fourth group - factors that determine the interaction of the sprayed particles
with the treated surface (particle size D) and the degree of surface readiness for
spraying, characterized by the value of Rzn [25].
When processing the results of experimental studies, the form of their presentation
is of no small importance. To predict the direction of the gradient, a power law
dependence is chosen, which has simplicity and the possibility of varying the values
of the coefficients and indicators for individual intervals. In the chosen form of power,
not only individual quantities are entered, but also incomplete similarity criteria
obtained from the analysis of the dimensions of the controlled factors of the process.
Several incomplete similarity criteria can be represented as dimensionless
relations (4.5):
Despite the fact that factors whose influence on the plasma deposition process is
insignificant are excluded from consideration, and not all criteria have a dimensionless
form, the validity of the obtained similarity is not denied.
Then, the adhesion force function of the coating to the base can be represented as
a power dependence (4.6):
51
After introducing the notation y = ln σsc; xi = lnPi; Ao = ln ao, equation (4.7)
takes the form (4.8):
Then the response function for the adhesion force will take the following form
(4.10):
In accordance with this plan, when studying the dependence of the adhesion force
on the modes of plasma coating, the conditions for conducting experiments were
selected (Table 4), which were implemented in a random (arbitrary) order.
To reduce the number of experiments, the method of mathematical planning of
the experiment was used. Preliminary experiments proved the inadequacy of linear
models. Therefore, to build a regression model linking the adhesion strength with
technological parameters (factors), a Box-Benken plan of the type of incomplete factor
experiment 3n was used, which allows to obtain a mathematical model and provide an
objective choice of controlled parameters of the technological process.
The purpose of selecting the controlled parameters is to reduce them to a
minimum while ensuring the high quality of the coatings obtained. This is achieved by
determining the coefficients of influence of the factors of the technological process
under study.
52
Table 4 - Areas of technological and energy change
Factors of the coating plasma projection process
Surface roughness
Spray distance L,
Average sprayed
Composition of
gasoline g1, g/s
particle size D, µm
plasma flow rate
Arc current I, A
Complex Components
Spray material
plasma gas C
Rz, µm
mm
The range of plasma spray 400– 0.9– 0.20- 70-140 30-85 19–51
parameters when determining σ 500 2.0 0.30 air
Surface roughness, µm
Spray distance, mm
plasma former gas, g/s
Arc current, A
pulverized material
size, µm
(powder), g/s
Factor levels
I gr1 g2 C L D Rz
Upper level 500 2.0 0.30 140 85 51
Air
Since the results of the tests to determine the value of σsc are characterized by a large
dispersion, a series of measurements was carried out in each experiment. This allowed
estimating the dispersion of the reproducibility of the results of the experimental
studies.
The following types of coatings were chosen as the coatings studied in the
framework of this work:
53
✓ Ni-based wear-resistant metal powder coatings of the type PG-SR4 with a dispersion
of (40–50) ∙10-6 m.
✓ Metal-fluoroplastic antifriction coatings with the following compositions: 60–70%
fluoroplastic + 30–40% bronze; 45–55% PTFE + 45–55% bronze; 25–30% PTFE +
70–75% bronze.
All coatings were applied by plasma spray.
The chemical composition of the PG-SR4 powder coating sprayed with air and
argon plasma is presented in Table 6.
Table 6 - Chemical composition of PG-SR4 powder coating sprayed with air and
argon plasma
Powder particle size, Chemical composition
microns Material processing method of the material, %
C B, Si Fe Cr
less than 50 original 0.85 2.84 1.61 15.35
less than 50 In an air-plasma environment 0.80 2.61 1.42 14.60
less than 50 In an argon-plasma environment 0.89 2.84 1.36 14.70
The coating was applied by plasma spray. The properties of the resulting coatings
are presented in table 7.
The deposition of metal-fluoroplastic coatings on the pieces was carried out in the
following ways:
➢ current - 110 A;
➢ air consumption - 2.2 m3 / h at a pressure of 2.2 atm.;
➢ dust consumption - 0.5 g / s;
➢ spray distance - 200 mm;
➢ movement speed of the plasma torch – 40 cm/min;
➢ speed of rotation of the part - 250 rpm.
The results of the adhesion strength tests of the metal-fluoroplastic coatings are
shown in Table 8.
54
Table 8 - Results of adhesion strength tests of metal-fluoroplastic coatings
Sample 𝑃, n Note
number
1 77 Formation of a hole in the layer of sprayed material
2 <77 It was not possible to determine the exact force of
destruction.
3 <10 It was not possible to determine the exact force of
destruction.
4 103 Destruction without hole formation
5 57 Formation of a hole in the layer of sprayed material
6 100 Destruction without hole formation
7 162 Destruction without hole formation
8 54 Destruction without hole formation
9 139 Destruction without hole formation
10 108 Formation of a hole in the layer of sprayed material
11 112 Formation of a hole in the layer of sprayed material
12 211 Formation of a hole in the layer of sprayed material
13 144 Formation of a hole in the layer of sprayed material
55
Table 9 - Properties of metal-fluoroplastic coatings
Sample Voltage, Compound покр, mm Notes
number MPa
1 1.10 60–70% PTFE + 0.2 Destruction by covering
30–40% bronze material.
2 1.10 60–70% PTFE + 0.2 The exact breaking force
30–40% bronze could not be determined.
3 0.14 60–70% PTFE + 1.3 The exact breaking force
30–40% bronze could not be determined.
4 1.47 45-55% PTFE + 0.35 Destruction by covering
45-50% bronze material.
5 0.80 45-55% PTFE + 0.2 Destruction by covering
45-50% bronze material.
6 1.43 45-55% PTFE + 0.8 Destruction by base
45-50% bronze material
7 2.31 25-30% PTFE + 0.5 Destruction by base
70-75% bronze material
8 0.77 25-30% PTFE + 0.8 Destruction by base
70-75% bronze material
9 1.98 25-30% PTFE + 1.2 Destruction by base
70-75% bronze material
10 1.54 Bronze 0.35 Destruction by covering
material.
11 1.60 Bronze 0.2 Destruction by covering
material.
12 3.01 Bronze 0.3 Destruction by covering
material.
13 2.06 Bronze 0.25 Destruction by covering
material.
The structure of the resulting PG-SR4 coating is shown in Figure 4.5. The
microstructure of the coating can be characterized as a classic example of a deposited
coating consisting of layer-by-layer particles of the coating material with clear
interparticle and interparticle-layer boundaries in the intervals between melt zones.
The coating contains large free graphite inclusions in a dense nickel matrix
containing CrC, BC and SiC phases with a hardness of 192–213 MPa. The diffuse
transition area from the coating to the base was (2-3) * 10-5 m, and the hardness of the
transition zone was 131-152 MPa.
56
a) microstructure at 75x magnification
57
c) microstructure at 150x magnification
Figure 4.5 - Micrographs of the PG-SR4 wear resistant coating
58
Figure 4.7 - Micrographs of thin sections of the coating 45–55% fluoroplast +
45–50% bronze
59
Figure 4.8 - Micrographs of thin sections of coatings 60...70% fluoroplast +
30...40% bronze
4.5 Study of the hardness of coatings and porosity of the superficial layers
Within the framework of this work, 4 batches of sprayed samples of wear resistant
coatings based on PG-SR4 were tested by the method
Rockwell with a load of 150 kg for 4 s. Three samples were tested in each batch.
When studying the hardness of sample materials, the following equipment was used:
➢ device model TK-14-250;
➢ indenter - diamond cone (form tolerance 120o ± 30o). The test results showed that
the average hardness number is 65.3 HRC.
The studies were performed on 54 samples with a size of at least 10.0x10.0 mm
with a layer thickness of at least 0.5 mm. The number of thin sections for studies of
one type of surface layer was at least 3 pieces.
Samples of three types of plasma coatings were used for analysis: PG-SR4 + 15%
Al2O3, PG-SR4 + 20% Al2O3 and PG-SR4. The results showed the porosity of the
three coatings in the range of 12-21% - table 10.
The mechanical properties of these coatings were investigated separately and are
shown in Table 11.
An analysis of the mechanical properties shows that the low adhesion strength of
the coating, which is approximately 5 times less than the tensile strength of the coating
60
material, is mainly associated with the porosity of the underlayer adjacent to the
substrate.
61
Table 12 - Test results of plasma coatings for wear resistance
Coating Microhardness Liner wear after Liner wear after Note
(±50HV0.2) 2000 revolutions, 6000 revolutions,
x10-2 x10-2
(mm3/Nm) (mm3/Nm)
PG-SR +15%Al2O3
#1 1850…1910 0.03 0.12 The cover is
#2 1350…1430 0.04 0.15 dense
#3 1880…1910 0.02 0.12
PG-SR +20%Al2O3
#1 1950…2030 0.03 0.10 The cover is
#2 1990…2020 0.03 0.10 dense.
#3 2010…2050 0.02 0.09
PG-SR +30%Al2O3
#1 1650…1720 0.02 0.14 Higher porosity
#2 1890…1930 0.03 0.12
#3 1740…1770 0.02 0.14
62
Table 13 - Test results of plasma coatings for wear resistance
PG- 165.72
SR4+20% 168.07 165.34 0,38
Al2O3 173.50 480 167.71 0,36 3.89
173.10 0,40
PG-SR4
+15%Al2 94,011 93,531 0,48
O3 94.61 480 94.11 0,50 3.25
95.72 95.25 0,47
63
CHAPTER 5 PRACTICAL APPLICATION AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY
OF RESEARCH RESULTS
5.1 Methodology for choosing the method, material and deposition modes of
multifunctional coatings
At the same time, stages 3, 4, 5 and 6 are the most difficult from a scientific and
technical point of view.
64
WhereCutting - the cost of 1 cm3 of lining, tenge. /cm3;
Judgment mat. – cost of materials spent on 1 cm3 of coating, tenge. /cm3;
trial, etc. - cost of expenses for other technological expenses to apply 1 cm3 of
coating, tenge. /cm3. Denoting by q the cost of one gram of consumable material (tg.
/g), taking into account losses in terms of the material utilization factor, we write the
specific cost of the coating in the form (5.2):
The specific time required to apply a unit volume of coating can be determined
from expression (5.4):
Св - the cost of restoring the camshaft using plasma coating of powder materials,
Sv = 19,200 tenge/piece;
The economic effect of the introduction into production of new technological
processes for hardening and restoring the camshaft of the injection pump is calculated
according to the following dependencies (5.5):
(5.5)
65
CONCLUSION
The expansion of the latest foreign technologies and equipment in the domestic
market is forcing equipment manufacturers and service consumers to radically
reconsider their positions on the quality of their products. One of the most important
areas for solving these problems is the formation of multifunctional coatings on the
surfaces of machine parts that protect the metal from corrosion and wear and make it
possible to maintain the performance of products for a long time. Therefore, progress
in this area is impossible without the development of effective technical and
technological developments that increase its reliability.
With a significant shortage of spare parts and their high cost, the development of
promising technologies for the restoration and hardening of defective parts is an
important task. At the same time, the convenience of repair in terms of material
consumption is due to the possibility of reusing most of the parts, both tight and
extremely worn. This allows you to carry out technological processes for the restoration
of parts in less time with the least expense of effort and money.
The achievement of the objective of the study is ensured by solving a set of
problems of a scientific and applied nature, which allowed the implementation and
obtaining of the following scientific results:
1. The mathematical model developed to calculate the technological modes of
plasma spraying of materials is based on modeling the heat and power characteristics
of the plasma torch, the dynamic parameters of the plasma jet and the thermodynamic
properties of plasma gases. The combined use of heating models for particles with high
and low thermal conductivity makes it possible to determine deposition modes for
almost all existing materials. When calculating the temperature of the particles, the
method of finite increments was used, which allowed to determine the temperature
distribution along the radius of the particles and to calculate the heating of the coated
particles.
2. The mathematical model proposed to optimize the technological processes of
restoring parts allows specifying the range of factors that most influence the
optimization criteria. It includes: methods for generating initial data, choosing an
optimization criterion using controlled factors that affect the costs of the restoration
process; a comprehensive evaluation of the method of application of plasma coatings
according to the criteria of minimum unit costs.
3. As a result of experimental studies, rational parameters of plasma spray modes
with powdery hard alloys in various protective gaseous media (argon, air) are
substantiated and determined. The established rational parameters of the modes of
plasma deposition of multifunctional coatings make it possible to design a specific
technological process for the restoration of worn parts.
4. On the basis of the conducted studies, new compositions of metal-polymer
coatings made of bronze in combination with fluoroplast (25-30% fluoroplast + 70-
75% bronze) and composite materials based on hard chrome-alloys Nickel (PG-CP4 +
20% Al2O3), which provides high wear resistance and increases the resource of
process equipment refurbished parts by 2.2-2.8 times compared to uncoated parts. The
optimal content of aluminum powder 20% Al2O3, added to hard powder alloys, which
66
allows to apply high-quality coatings without pores or cracks, was determined
experimentally. With a decrease in the aluminum content to 15%, pores appear, and
with an increase to 30%, the formation of coatings sharply deteriorates.
67
BIBLIOGRAPHY
68
12 Ivanov, V. P. Istochniki ekonomicheskoj effektivnosti remontno-
vosstanovitel'nogo proizvodstva / V. P. Ivanov, T. V. Vigerina // Trudy GOSNITI. –
2018. – T. 130. – S. 265-270.
13 Kolomejchenko, A. V. Povyshenie resursa detalej metodami plazmennogo
elektroliticheskogo oksidirovaniya / A. V. Kolomejchenko, V. N. Logachev, N. V.
Titov // Fizika i himiya obrabotki materialov. – 2017. – № 3. – S. 25-32.
14 Puti sovershenstvovaniya tekhnologii i oborudovaniya elektrodugovoj
metallizacii / V. N. Logachev, A. A. Izmalkov, A. V. Gneushev i dr. //
Energoeffektivnye i resursosberegayushchie tekhnologii i sistemy: mezhvuzovskij
sbornik nauchnyh trudov: Saransk. – 2017. – S. 435-440.
15 Lyalyakin, V. P. Perspektivy vosstanovleniya detalej sel'skohozyajstvennoj
tekhniki / V. P. Lyalyakin // Trudy Rosinformagrotekh. – 2017. – S. 473– 477.
16 Solov'ev, S. A. Tekhnicheskij servis mashin i oborudovaniya v
zhivotnovodstve / S. A. Solov'ev, S. A. Goryachev // Vestnik Vserossijskogo nauchno-
issledovatel'skogo instituta mekhanizacii zhivotnovodstva. – 2016. – № 2 (22). – S. 49-
52.
17 Fedorenko, F V. Perspektivy primeneniya additivnyh tekhnologij pri
proizvodstve i tekhnicheskom servise sel'skohozyajstvennoj tekhniki: nauch. analit.
obzor / F V. Fedorenko, I. G. Golubev. – M.: FGBNU «Rosinformagrotekh», 2018. –
140 s.
18 CHernoivanov, V. I. Organizaciya i tekhnologiya vosstanovleniya detalej
mashi: nauch. izdanie / V. I. CHernoivanov, V. P. Lyalyakin, I. G. Golubev. – M.:
FGNU «Rosinformagrotekh», 2016. – 568 s.
19 GOST 9012-59 Metally. Metod izmereniya tverdosti po Brinellyu. – M:
Standartinform, 2007. – 42 s.
20 GOST 9013-59 Metally. Metod izmereniya tverdosti po Rokvellu. – M: IPK
Izdatel'stvo standartov, 2002. – 10 s.
21 Chazelas, C. The Main Issues to Address in Modeling Plasma Spray Torch
Operation / C. Chazelas, J. P. Trelles, A. Vardelle // Journal of Thermal Spray
Technology. – 2017. – January 2017, Volume 26, Issue 1-2. – P. 3–11.
22 Modification of Plasma-sprayed TiO2 Coatings Characteristics via Controlling
the In-flight Temperature and Velocity of the Powder Particles / J. Cizek, I. Dlouhy, F.
Siska et al. // Journal of Thermal Spray Technology. – 2014. – December 2014, Volume
23, Issue 8. – P. 1339-1349
23 Fauchais, P. Latest Researches Advances of Plasma Spraying: From Splat to
Coating Formation / P. Fauchais, M. Vardelle, S. Goutier // Journal of Thermal Spray
Technology. – 2016. – December 2016, Volume 25, Issue 8. – P. 1534-1553.
24 Simulation of Motion, Heating, and Breakup of Molten Metal Droplets in the
Plasma Jet at Plasma-Arc Spraying / M. Yu. Kharlamov, I. V. Krivtsun, V. N. Korzhyk
et al. // Journal of Thermal Spray Technology. – 2015. – April 2015, Volume 24, Issue
4. – P. 659-670.
25 Golubev, I. G. Opyt importozameshcheniya zapasnyh chastej zarubezhnoj
sel'skohozyajstvennoj tekhniki / I. G. Golubev, P. I. Nosihin, A. F. Fadeev. – MFGNU
«Rosinformagrotekh», 2010. – 32 s
69
26 Gulyaev, I. P. Osobennosti polucheniya i obrabotki polyh chastic v
plazmennyh potokah: avtoref. dis. … kand. fizmat. nauk: 01.02.05 / Gulyaev
Igor' Pavlovich. – Novosibirsk, 2010. – 19 s.
27 Erohin, M. N. Sposoby modificirovaniya poverhnostej treniya detalej mashin
/ M. N. Erohin, S. P. Kazancev, N. N. CHupyatov. – M.: MGAU im. V. P.
Goryachkina, 2014. – 140 s.
28 Vosstanovlenie i uprochnenie detalej mashin
sel'skohozyajstvennogonaznacheniya sverhzvukovym gazodinamicheskim
napyleniem : prakticheskie rekomendacii dlya rukovoditelej i specialistov inzhenerno-
tekhnicheskih sluzhb APK: uchebnoe posobie / A. V. Kolomejchenko, V. N. Korenev,
V. N. Logachev i dr. – Orel Orlovskij gosudarstvennyj agrarnyj universitet , 2012. –
20 s
70