Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Role and Importance of The Smal
The Role and Importance of The Smal
Abstract: The goal of the study is the examination of the impact of the small business sector on the
local economic growth in the Mazowieckie Province. The research proves that the increase in the
numbers of operating and newly registered small enterprises contributes positively to the county
economic development measured with the total value and the per capita value of traded production
generated by locally operating enterprises, as well as the number of their employees. Additionally the
increase in realized capital expenditures and the province GDP positively impact the county’s eco-
nomic development. The study is based on data from the Local Data Bank of GUS and covers all
counties (excluding the capital city of Warsaw) in the province during the period 2003-2014.
Keywords: small business sector, regional development, the Mazowieckie Province
Streszczenie: Celem artykułu jest analiza wpływu sektora małych przedsiębiorstw na rozwój regionalny
na przykładzie województwa mazowieckiego. Badania potwierdzają, że wzrost liczby działających i nowo
zarejestrowanych małych przedsiębiorstw pozytywnie przyczynia się do rozwoju gospodarczego każde-
go powiatu, mierzonego produkcją sprzedaną na jednego mieszkańca i całkowitą produkcją sprzedaną,
wytworzoną przez działające w nim przedsiębiorstwa, jak również na liczbę ich pracowników. Ponadto
stwierdzono, że wzrost nakładów inwestycyjnych i PKB województwa mają pozytywny wpływ na rozwój
gospodarczy powiatów. Badania oparte są na danych pochodzących z Banku Danych Lokalnych GUS
i dotyczą wszystkich powiatów województwa (z wyjątkiem Warszawy) w latach 2003-2014.
Słowa kluczowe: sektor małych przedsiębiorstw, rozwój regionalny, województwo mazowieckie
Introduction
1
Mailing address: Warsaw School of Life Science – SGGW, Faculty of Economic Sciences, 166
Nowoursynowska Street, 02-787 Warszawa, e-mail: sylwester_kozak@sggw.pl.
2
M. Baumol, Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth, “American Economic Review” 1968, vol. 58(2),
p. 64-71.
3
T.A. Cravo, B. Becker, A. Gourlay, Regional Growth and SMEs in Brazil: A Spatial Panel Approach,
“Regional Studies” 2015, vol. 49(12), p. 1995-2016.
4
V. Lepojevic, M. Ivanovic Djukic, J. Mladenovic, Entrepreneurship and economic development: a com-
parative analysis of developed and developing countries, “Facta Universitatis. Series: Economics and
Organization” – University of Nis 2016, vol. 13(1), p. 17-29; T.A. Cravo, B. Becker, A. Gourlay, Regional
Growth and SMEs in Brazil: A Spatial Panel Approach, “Regional Studies” 2015, vol. 49(12), p. 1995-
-2016.
5
M. Hart, E. Hanvey, Job Generation and New Small Firms: Some Evidence from the late 1980s,
“Small Business Economics” 1995, vol. 7(2), p. 97-109.
6
M. Callejon, A. Segarra, Business Dynamics and Efficiency in Industries and Regions: The Case
of Spain, “Small Business Economics” 1999, vol. 13(4), p. 253-271.
7
S. Foelster, Do Entrepreneurship Create Jobs?, “Small Business Economics” 2000, vol. 14(2),
p. 137-148.
8
D.B. Audretsch, M. Keilbach, Entrepreneurship Capital and regional Growth, “The Annals of
Regional Science” 2005, vol. 39(3), p. 457-469.
Similar conclusions were drawn by Audretsch and Fritsch9 who state that in the
1990s regions with higher levels of newly opened businesses recorded higher
than average economic growth.
Holtz-Eakin and Kao10 studying the relationship between productivity (de-
fined as the state GDP per one employee) and entrepreneurship (defined as
a ratio of the number of those newly opened by the number of enterprises already
operating in a given year) in the 1990s in individual US states suggest that the
level of entrepreneurship is positively correlated with the productivity growth in
the state. This means that a greater number of companies in the state contribute
positively to the improvement of its competitiveness and generated GDP growth.
Mueller11 indicates the importance of the entrepreneurial environment for
regional development. Comparing the significance of other factors of production,
i.e. physical capital or labour he notes that knowledge and technological skills are
one of the most important factors for regional development. He also observes
that the highest growth could reach regions which recorded the highest rates of
newly opened technology companies – start-ups.
Summing up, the conclusions of existing research could lead to the state-
ment that entrepreneurship, represented by the creation of new enterprises and
closing uncompetitive ones, positively impact the dynamics of economic devel-
opment. This relationship is more recognized in countries and regions with
a higher level of technological development and in more urbanized areas.
The Mazowieckie Province is located in the central part of Poland and its
capital city is the country's capital – Warsaw. It consists of 42 counties, of which
5 have the status of a city. In 2015 the population of the province amounted to
5.3 million people, i.e. 14% of the total country's population. Most of its residents
live in urban areas (64% compared to 60% in Poland) (Fig. 1). The population of
the province is relatively young. In 2015 the average age of approximately 21%
of the population did not exceed 19 years (20% in Poland). In contrast to the
whole country, in 2015 the number of the region's population increased by 2.4
thousand making a positive natural increase of 0.05% compared to the down-
ward trend recorded in the whole country of -0.07%. This indicates that the hu-
man potential of the region is significant and tends to increase, which gives
better prospects for economic development.
Households in Mazowieckie achieve the highest incomes in the country.
Their strong purchasing potential allows the companies operating there to
achieve greater sales of consumer goods and services. In 2015 the average
monthly income per capita was the highest in the country and amounted to
1756 PLN, which accounted for 127% of the national average. Mazowieckie is
9
D. Audretsch, M. Fritsch, Growth Regimes over Time and Space, “Regional Studies” 2002,
vol. 36(2), p. 113-124.
10
D. Holtz-Eakin, Ch. Kao, Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: The Proof is in Productivity,
Maxwell School – Center for Policy Research, Working Paper no. 50, 2003.
11
P. Mueller, Exploiting Entrepreneurial Opportunities: The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Growth,
“Small Business Economics” 2007, vol. 28(4), p. 355-362.
Fig. 1. The share of residents of urbanized areas (LHS) and the share
of residents up to 19 years old in the total number of residents (RHS)
Source: own elaboration based on GUS data.
might create more favourable conditions for enterprises operating in the prov-
ince compared to the rest of the country.
PLN bn %
1,800 1.8
1,600 1.6
1,400 1.4
1,200 1.2
1,000 1.0
800 0.8
600 0.6
400 0.4
200 0.2
0 0.0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
GDP - Poland (LHS) GDP - Mazowieckie (LHS)
GDP growth - Poland (RHS) GDP growth - Mazowieckie (RHS)
Fig. 2. GDP and the GDP growth in Poland and the Mazowieckie Province
Source: own elaboration based on GUS data.
1300 100
1200 80
1100 60
1000 40
900 20
800 0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Already registered - Poland (LHS) Already registered - Mazowieckie (LHS)
Newly registered - Poland (RHS) Newly registered - Mazowieckie (RHS)
Withdrawn - Poland (RHS) Withdrawn - Mazowieckie (RHS)
Fig. 3. Number of already registered, newly registered and withdrawn companies from
the REGON registry per 10 thousand residents in Poland and Mazowieckie Province
Source: own elaboration based on GUS data.
The data for all counties of Mazowieckie are used (with the exception
of the capital city of Warsaw) for testing the hypothesis of a positive impact of
increased activity of small enterprises on the county economic development in
the years 2003-2014. The source of data is the Local Data Bank of the Central
Statistical Office (GUS). A limit on the range of achievable economic and finan-
cial characteristics of counties lowers the possible number of variables repre-
senting regional economic development or the level of entrepreneurship. For
this reason, the economic situation of the county is described by means of the
volume of traded production generated by the enterprises registered in the
county and employing more than 9 persons (Ident.: Production). The variable
which substitutes the value of GDP per capita is the ratio of the retailed produc-
tion per capita (Ident.: Production pc). This variable, by a certain degree, also
characterizes the efficiency of companies located in the county. The state of
the labour market, in a certain way, testifies to the level of the county's eco-
nomic development. For this reason, the study uses the parameter of the num-
ber of employees in enterprises registered in the county and employing more
than 9 persons (Ident.: Employment).
The level of small business activities in a county is characterized by two
parameters. The first one equals the total number of private sector entities attribut-
able to 10 thousand residents (Ident.: Firms). The fact that individual businesses
comprise 80% of all companies allows us, with considerable approximation, to
assume that the adopted parameter “Firms” well characterizes the state of the
small business sector in the county. Similarly, the number of newly opened busi-
nesses per 10 thousand residents is also an equivalent of entrepreneurship and its
pace of the growth. Capital expenditures could be treated as the contribution to
development in innovation and new technologies (Ident.: Investment). In addition to
the county characteristics, the province's GDP (Indent.: GDP MZW) is included in
the group of explanatory variables. It characterizes the state of the macroeconomic
environment for all districts of Mazowieckie. Distributions of variables used in the
estimations are characterized by the descriptive statistics (Tab. 1).
Based on the results of the literature review the following panel regres-
sion model with fixed effects is proposed:
where:
– variables describing the level of economic development of the county i in
time t (variables: Production, Production pc, Employment);
Table 2. Results of the estimation of the panel regression with fixed effects
Variable Production Stat. t Production pc Stat.t Employment Stat. t
Firms 5.359 a
3.09 16.64 1.25 23.747 a
5.51
New firms 2.191a 7.13 8.477a 3.59 7.369a 9.32
Investment (-1) 0.297 1.09 7.346a 3.49 2.505a 3.61
GDP (-1) 0.002a 4.57 0.035a 8.60 0.001 0.30
Constant -2866a -7.94 -9041a -3.26 9113a 9.88
Number of observations
340 (34) 340 (34) 340 (34)
(groups)
Statistics F 64.62 74.30 88.26
Coefficient R2 0.461 0.496 0.512
Note:a – level of statistical significance 1%; (-1) – one year lag.
Source: own elaboration based on GUS data.
The results are consistent with the results presented in the current re-
search on the relationship between the activity of small businesses and the
economic development of the region. The value of the traded production posi-
tively depends on both, the number of firms presently and the newly registered
in a given year. An increase of one entity in relation to 10 thousand residents
could increase by 5.4 million PLN the annual retailed production generated in
a given district. On the other hand, an increase of one newly registered entity per
10 thousand residents could increase this production by 2.2 million PLN, which
is consistent with the results obtained by Audretsch and Fritsch 12, Callejon and
Segarra13 and Mueller14. The total value of transacted production is also related
12
D. Audretsch, M. Fritsch, op. cit.
13
M. Callejon, A.M. Segarra, op. cit.
Conclusions
The study evaluates the state of the economy, labour market and econom-
ic activity of small businesses in counties of the Mazowieckie Province during the
period 2003-2014 based on the data from individual counties. The results of the
analysis of the panel regression between indicators representing the county's eco-
nomic development and the operating there of small enterprises allow drawing the
following conclusions:
A growing number of enterprises registered in a county is an important in-
dicator of the rising economic potential of enterprises and households lo-
cated there. The increase in the number of registered small enterprises
positively affects the level of sold production generated by local enterpris-
es, as well as the number of their employees.
The growth of entrepreneurship and the increase in the number of newly
registered companies increases the economic potential of enterprises and
households and improves the county`s competitiveness. The increase in
the annual number of newly registered small enterprises has a positive ef-
fect on the value of production retailed, the number of employees in the
county and the efficiency of enterprises, expressed in value the production
performed per one inhabitant.
14
P. Mueller, op. cit.
15
D. Holtz-Eakin, Ch. Kao, op. cit.
16
M. Hart, E. Hanvey, op. cit.
17
S. Folster, op. cit.
Bibliography
Arent A., Bojar M., Duarte N., Diniz F., 2013, The role of SMEs in sustainable re-
gional development and local business integration: The case of Lublin re-
gion (Poland), https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa15p611.html.
Audretsch D.B., Keilbach M., Entrepreneurship Capital and regional Growth, “The
Annals of Regional Science” 2005, vol. 39(3), p. 457-469.
Audretsch D., Fritsch M., Growth Regimes over Time and Space, “Regional Stud-
ies” 2002, vol. 36(2), p. 113-124.
Baumol M., Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth, “American Economic Review”
1968, vol. 58(2), p. 64-71.
Callejon M., Segarra A., Business Dynamics and Efficiency in Industries and Re-
gions: The Case of Spain, “Small Business Economics” 1999, vol. 13(4),
p. 253-271.
Cravo T.A., Becker B., Gourlay A., Regional Growth and SMEs in Brazil: A Spatial
Panel Approach, “Regional Studies” 2015, vol. 49(12), p. 1995-2016.
Foelster S., Do Entrepreneurship Create Jobs?, “Small Business Economics”
2000, vol. 14(2), p. 137-148.
Hart M., Hanvey E., Job Generation and New Small Firms: Some Evidence from
the late 1980s, “Small Business Economics” 1995, vol. 7(2), p. 97-109.
Holtz-Eakin D., Kao Ch., Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: The Proof is in
Productivity, Maxwell School – Center for Policy Research, Working Paper
no. 50, 2003.
Lepojevic V., Ivanovic Djukic M., Mladenovic J., Entrepreneurship and economic
development: a comparative analysis of developed and developing coun-
tries, “Facta Universitatis. Series: Economics and Organization” – University
of Nis 2016, vol. 13(1), p. 17-29.
Mueller P., Exploiting Entrepreneurial Opportunities: The Impact of Entrepreneur-
ship on Growth, “Small Business Economics” 2007, vol. 28(4), p. 355-362.