Official Electronic IPCRF Tool

v4.2
Proficient Regular Teacher

School Ratee
Official Electronic IPCRF Tool v4.2
Official IPCRF Rating Encoding Form v4.2
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Regular Teachers in the Proficient Stage
Name of Employee: JENNY ROSE C. DIZON Name of Rater: MARY MAGUERITE C. DASALLA
Position: Teacher I Position: Head Teacher VI
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: San Jose City National High School - San Jose City Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2023-2024

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied SY 2023- 7.00% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
Education Knowledge and knowledge of 2024 objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
Services Pedagogy content within and
agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms observer agreement forms or observer agreement forms or
across curriculum No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
Quality
teaching areas
(PPST 1.1.2) was shown was shown

Objective was met within the Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence
Efficiency allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
allotted time
2. Used a range of SY 2023- 7.00% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
teaching strategies 2024 objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
that enhance
agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms observer agreement forms or observer agreement forms or
learner No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
Quality
achievement in
literacy and was shown was shown
numeracy skills
(PPST 1.4.2)
Objective was met within the Objective was met but No acceptable evidence
Efficiency allotted time instruction exceeded the was shown
allotted time
3. Applied a range SY 2023- 7.00% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
of teaching 2024 objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
strategies to
agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms observer agreement forms or observer agreement forms or
develop critical No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
Quality
and creative
thinking, as well as was shown was shown
other higher-order
thinking skills
Objective was met within the Objective was met but No acceptable evidence was
(PPST 1.5.2) allotted time instruction exceeded the shown
Efficiency
allotted time
2. Learning 4. Managed SY 2023- 7.00% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
Environment & classroom 2024 objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
Diversity of structure to
agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms observer agreement forms or observer agreement forms or
Learners engage learners, No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
Quality
individually or in
groups, in was shown was shown
meaningful
exploration,

Page 1 of 5
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave

Objective was met within the Objective was met but No acceptable evidence was
discovery and allotted time instruction exceeded the shown
Efficiency
hands-on activities allotted time
5. Managed SY 2023- 7% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
learner behavior 2024 objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
constructively by
agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms observer agreement forms or observer agreement forms or
applying positive No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
Quality
and non-violent
discipline to was shown was shown
ensure learning-
focused
Objective was met within the Objective was met but No acceptable evidence was
environments allotted time instruction exceeded the shown
Efficiency
(PPST 2.6.2) allotted time
6. Used SY 2023- 7% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
differentiated, 2024 objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
developmentally
agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms observer agreement forms or observer agreement forms or
appropriate No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
Quality
learning
experiences to was shown was shown
address learners’
gender, needs,
Objective was met within the Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence was
strengths, interests allotted time instruction exceeded the shown
Efficiency
and experiences allotted time
3. Curriculum and 7. Planned, SY 2023- 7% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
Planning managed and 2024 objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- observer rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
implemented
agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms observer agreement forms or observer agreement forms or
developmentally No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
Quality
sequenced
teaching and was shown was shown
learning processes
to meet curriculum
Objective was met within the Objective was met but No acceptable evidence was
requirements and allotted time instruction exceeded the shown
Efficiency
varied teaching allotted time
8. Participated in SY 2023- 7% Planned for enriched Reflected on practices Shared practices, teacher Attended LAC sessions / No acceptable evidence
collegial 2024 teaching practice based on during LAC sessions / FGDs and learner feedback during FGDs / meetings / other was shown
LAC sessions / FGDs / / meetings / other collegial LAC sessions / FGDs / collegial discussions that
discussions that
meetings / other collegial discussions to plan, meetings / other collegial discuss teacher/learner
use teacher and discussions attended, as facilitate, and enrich discussions to plan, feedback to enrich
learner feedback Quality shown in MOV 3 teaching practice, as shown in facilitate, and enrich instruction, as shown in
to enrich teaching MOV 3 teaching practice, as shown in MOV 1
practice (PPST MOV 2

4.4.2)

Participated in collegial
discussions that discuss
teacher and learner feedback
Timeliness
across 4 quarters
Participated in collegial Participated in collegial Participated in a collegial No acceptable evidence
discussions that discuss discussions that discuss discussion that discusses was shown
teacher and learner feedback teacher and learner feedback teacher and learner feedback
across 3 quarters across 2 quarters in only 1 quarter

Page 2 of 5
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave

9. Selected, SSYY2200 - 7% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
developed, 22 objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
organized and 2024
observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms or observer agreement forms or
used appropriate Quality No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was
teaching and shown shown
learning
resources,
including ICT, to
Objective was met within the Objective was met but No acceptable evidence was
address learning allotted time instruction exceeded the shown
Efficiency
goals (PPST 4.5.2) allotted time

4. Assessment 10. Designed, SY 2023- 7% Demonstrated Level 7 in the Demonstrated Level 6 in the Demonstrated Level 5 in the Demonstrated Level 4 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the Demonstrated Level 3 in the
and Reporting selected, 2024 objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT objective as shown in COT
rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter- rating sheets / inter-
organized and
observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms observer agreement forms or observer agreement forms or
used diagnostic, Quality No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was
formative and shown shown
summative
assessment
strategies
Objective was met within the Objective was met but 0 No acceptable evidence was
consistent with
Efficiency allotted time instruction exceeded the shown
curriculum allotted time

11. Monitored and SY 2023- 7% Involved learner/s Monitored and evaluated Monitored and evaluated Monitored and evaluated No acceptable evidence was
evaluated learner 2024 in monitoring and evaluation learner progress and learner progress and learner progress and shown
of their own progress and achievement based on achievement based on the achievement based on an
progress and
achievement attainment data from an class attainment data existing grade level /
achievement using Quality individual learner department / learning area
learner attainment report
data (PPST 5.2.2)

Submitted MOV/s show/s Submitted MOV/s show/s Submitted MOV/s show/s Submitted MOV/s show/s No acceptable evidence was
monitoring and evaluation monitoring and evaluation monitoring and evaluation monitoring and evaluation shown
Timeliness done across 4 quarters done across 3 quarters done across 2 quarters done in only 1 quarter

12. Communicated SY 2023- 7% Sustained engagement Communicated promptly Communicated promptly Communicated learners’ No acceptable evidence was
promptly and 2024 through regular and clearly using various and clearly using only one needs, progress and shown
communication of learners’ tools and strategies (1) strategy learners’ needs, achievement to key
clearly the
needs, progress and learners’ needs, progress progress and achievement to stakeholders, including
learners’ needs, achievement to key and achievement to key key stakeholders, including parents/guardians , but not
progress and Quality stakeholders, including stakeholders, including parents/guardians regularly as shown in the
achievement to parents/guardians , as shown parents/guardians , as shown , as shown in the MOV MOV submitted
key stakeholders, in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted submitted

including
parents/guardians
(PPST 5.4.2)
Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt Showed prompt No acceptable evidence was
communication of learners’ communication of learners’ communication of learners’ communication of learners’ shown
needs, progress and needs, progress and needs, progress and needs, progress and
Timeliness achievement across 4 achievement across 3 achievement across 2 achievement in only 1
quarters quarters quarters quarter

Page 3 of 5
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave

5. Personal 13. Applied a SY 7% Submitted MOV that details Submitted MOV that reflects Submitted MOV that shows Submitted MOV that No acceptable evidence was
Growth and personal 2023- the consistent involvement involvement of learners in the application of a personal indicates a personal shown
of learners in the teaching- the teaching-learning philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that
Professional philosophy of 2024
learning process resulting process resulting from the is learner-centered is not learner- centered
Development teaching that is from the application of a application of a personal
learner-centered Quality personal philosophy of philosophy of teaching that
(PPST 7.1.2) teaching that is learner- is learner-centered
centered

Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal Applied a personal No acceptable evidence was
philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that philosophy of teaching that shown
Timeliness is learner-centered across 4 is learner-centered across 3 is learner-centered across 2 is learner-centered in only 1
quarters quarters quarters quarter

14. Set SY 2023- 7% Updated professional Discussed progress on Set professional Accomplished the e-SAT at No acceptable evidence was
professional 2024 development goals during professional development development goals based on the beginning of the school shown
Phase II of the RPMS Cycle goals with the rater during e-SAT results as year as evidenced by MOV 1
development goals Quality as evidenced by MOV 4 the mid-year review as evidenced by MOV 2
based on the evidenced by MOV 3
Philippine
Professional
Submitted 4 acceptable Submitted 3 acceptable Submitted 2 acceptable Submitted 1 acceptable MOV No acceptable evidence was
Standards for Efficiency MOVs MOVs MOVs shown
Teachers (PPST
All four (4) submitted MOVs Three (3) of the submitted Two (2) of the submitted Only one (1) of the No acceptable evidence was
7.5.2)
were accomplished within MOVs were accomplished MOVs were accomplished submitted MOVs was shown
Timeliness the prescribed RPMS Phase within the prescribed RPMS within the prescribed RPMS accomplished within the
Phase Phase prescribed RPMS Phase

Page 4 of 5
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Rating
Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
-
Plus Factor 15. Performed SY 3- 2% Performed at least one (1) Performed at least one (1) Performed at least one (1) Performed at least one (1) No acceptable evidence was
202 related work / activity that related work / activity that related work / activity that related work / activity that shown
various related
2024 contributed to the teaching- contributed to the teaching- contributed to the teaching- contributed to the teaching-
works/activities
learning process beyond the learning process within the learning process within the learning process within the
that contribute to school / Community school / Community learning area/department as class as evidenced by the
the teaching Quality Learning Center (CLC) as Learning Center (CLC) as evidenced by the submitted submitted MOV.
learning process evidenced by the submitted evidenced by the submitted MOV.
(PPST 8.1) MOV. MOV.

Submitted MOV that
details the achieved positive
contribution to the teaching-
learning process, as
Efficiency
evidenced by the annotation
provided.
Submitted MOV that
details the perceived
positive contribution to the
teaching-learning process,
as evidenced by the
annotation provided.
Submitted MOV that
shows reasonable interlap
with the actual teaching-
learning process, as
evidenced by the annotation
provided.
Submitted MOV that No acceptable evidence was
shows considerable overlap shown
with, hence significantly
affecting the performance of
the actual teaching- learning
process.

Submitted MOVs were Submitted MOVs were Submitted MOVs were Submitted MOV/s was/were No acceptable evidence was
Timeliness distributed across 4 quarters distributed across 3 quarters distributed across 2 quarters completed in only 1 quarter shown

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

JENNY ROSE C. DIZON MARY MARGUERITE C, DASALLA VILMA C. NUÑEZ, PHD

Ratee Rater Approving Authority

Page 5 of 5
 PART II: COMPETENCIES
Instructions: Please indicate the number of competency indicators that you demonstrated during the performance cycle.
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management Teamwork

1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development.
2. Undertakes personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and takes into account personal goals and
values congruent to that of the organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
4. Prioritizes work tasks and schedules (through Gantt chants, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals.
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
Professionalism and Ethics
1. Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public
Officials and Employees (RA 6713).
2. Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of his/her actions and
decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and punctuality, good
grooming and communication.
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.
5. Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, improve system and help
others improve their effectiveness.
Results Focus
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing organizational needs before
personal needs.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating procedures correctly and
consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality work in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness
with no supervision required.
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new or more
precise ways of meeting goals set.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples may include
doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently, or improving quality, customer satisfaction,
morale, without setting any specific goal.
Note: The assessment in the demonstration of competencies shall not be reflected in the final rating. These competencies are monitored to inform professional development plans (DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015, p. 9).
1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
2. Promotes collaboration and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the
organization.
4 3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
5
4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish organization goals
and objectives.
Service Orientation
1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues and concerns.
5 3. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and women empowerment.
5
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on DepEd strategies and directions.
5. Develops and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures that will further
enhance service delivery.
Innovation
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new ideas, processes and suggests
better ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving personal
productivity to create higher value and results.
3 3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions.
3
4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization.
5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability to succeed
with minimal resources.
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Regular Teachers in the Proficient Stage
Name of Employee: SOLEDAD D. PUNZALAN Name of Rater: JACINTO T. ROLDAN JR.
Position: Teacher III Position: Head Teacher VI
ureau/Center/Service/Division: San Jose City National High School - San Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

PART III. SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings Adjectival
KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave Rating
KRA 1 21% Objective 1 7% 1 1.000 0.070 Poor
Objective 2 7% 1 1.000 0.070 Poor
Objective 3 7% 1 1.000 0.070 Poor
KRA 2 21% Objective 4 7% 1 1.000 0.070 Poor
Objective 5 7% 1 1.000 0.070 Poor
Objective 6 7% 1 1.000 0.070 Poor
KRA 3 21% Objective 7 7% 1 1.000 0.070 Poor
Objective 8 7% 0.000 0.000 Poor
Objective 9 7% 1 1.000 0.070 Poor
KRA 4 21% Objective 10 7% 1 1.000 0.070 Poor
Objective 11 7% 0.000 0.000 Poor
Objective 12 7% 0.000 0.000 Poor
KRA 5 14% Objective 13 7% 0.000 0.000 Poor
Objective 14 7% 0.000 0.000 Poor
Plus Factor 2% Objective 15 2% 0.000 0.000 Poor
FINAL PERFORMANCE Final Rating 0.630
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives
RESULTS Adjectival Rating Poor

CEASAR C. DAYPO MARY MARGUERITE C. DASALLA VILMA C. NUÑEZ,PHD

Page 1 of 2
 PART III. SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION
Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings Adjectival
KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave Rating
Ratee Rater Approving Authority

Page 2 of 2
 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
NOTE:
This sheet shall be accomplished during: i) Phase I: Performance Planning and Commitment, based on the results of e-SAT; and ii) Phase
II: Performance Monitoring and Coaching, based on the agreements on the Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form and Mid-
year Review Form; and iii) Phase IV: Performance Rewarding and Development Planning, based on the actual results of IPCRF.

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Intervention)
Learning Objectives
A. Functional Competencies
1. To understand my students.
2. To encourage active
participation and engagement
in the learning process to
promote active learning.
Include practical exercises,
collaborative projects, and
real-world applications to
improve students'
comprehension and critical
thinking abilities.
3. To focus on student
autonomy by including
students in decision-making
processes to give them a
sense of control over their
learning.
Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention
1. Invest the time to get to SY 2023-2024 Peer teaching and mentoring
know each one of them, taking Master
into account their learning Teachers
preferences, interests, Department Heads
objectives, and background Gadgets and internet for
knowledge. further reading
2. Modify my Inventory of Learning Styles
teaching strategies and
lesson plans to better suit
learners' individual learning
needs.
3. Provide options and
chances for self-direction so
that students can pick the
subjects that interest them,
form learning objectives, and
decide how to show their
understanding.

Page 1 of 4

Strengths
B. Core Behavioral Competencies
Action Plan
Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Intervention)
Learning Objectives
1. To plan and prepare
thorough lesson plans and
instructional materials that
are in line with the objectives
and goals of the curriculum.
2. To engage students in
relevant, interactive activities
that encourage active
participation, critical thinking,
and problem-solving to
facilitate active learning.
3. Adapt teaching strategies
to suit various learners'
interests and learning
styles.
1. To provide feedback and
encourage reflection.
2. To promote
collaboration and teamwork.
3. To
stimulate critical reading
and analysis.
Page 2 of 4
Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention
1. When creating learning SY 2023-2024 Peer teaching and mentoring
experiences, take into account Master
the various needs and learning Teachers
preferences of the pupils. Department Heads
2. I Gadgets and internet for
mprove knowledge and further reading
learning outcomes, promote Samples of Error free
teamwork, conversation, and outputs
practical experiences.
3.
Track
student participation and
modify your instruction as
necessary.
1. Offer timely and SY 2023-2024 Peer teaching and mentoring
constructive feedback to Master
students on their critical and Teachers
creative thinking processes Department Heads
and outcomes. Gadgets and internet for
2. Encourage students further reading
to reflect on their thinking, Inventory of Learning Styles
evaluate their strategies,
and set goals for
improvement.
3. Encourage
collaborative learning
activities where students
work together to solve
problems, analyze
information, and create
solutions.
 Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Intervention) Timeline Resources Needed
Learning Objectives Intervention
Professionalism and Ethics Results Focus 1. To put an emphasis on 1. Establish goals that SY 2023-2024 Peer teaching
quality and efficiency of work. place an emphasis on and mentoring
2. To establish clear and producing high-quality Master Teachers
specific expectations with work and attaining Department Heads
relation to work standards,
efficient results. Gadgets and internet for
processes, and outputs.
further reading
3. To attend training courses
and other tools to develop 2. Provide thorough Inventory of Learning Styles
the abilities, knowledge, training and assistance.
and understanding of work 3. To address
procedures. any gaps and reinforce
corporate priorities, give
ongoing support and
Teamwork Innovation 1. To generate and evaluate 1. Engage co-workers in SY 2023-2024 Peer teaching
ideas. generating a wide range and mentoring
2. To break down the solutions of ideas and solutions to Master Teachers
into specific steps, assign address organizational Department Heads
responsibilities, and establish
challenges. Gadgets and internet for
timelines.
2. Encourage brainstorming further reading
3. To
facilitate knowledge sessions, idea sharing, and Samples of Innovations
sharing, idea exchange, and cross-functional
collaboration to leverage collaboration to gather
diverse expertise and diverse perspectives.
perspectives. 3. Establish
mechanisms for evaluating
and selecting the most
promising ideas for
implementation.

Page 3 of 4
 Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Intervention) Timeline Resources Needed
Learning Objectives Intervention
Service Orientation Self-Management 1. To identify and articulate the 1. Ensure that goals are SY 2023-2024 Peer teaching
goals to be achieved. specific, measurable, and mentoring
2. To align with organizational attainable, relevant, and Master Teachers
objectives. fostering time-bound (SMART). Department Heads
organizational success and
2. Establish a Gadgets and internet for
growth.
shared understanding of the further reading
3. To monitor progress and
provide feedback. goals with others to ensure Seminars
alignment and clarity.
3. Ensure that the
goals set align with the
overall objectives and
strategic direction of the
organization.

CEASAR C, DAYPO MARY MARGUERITE C. DASALLA VILMA C. NUÑEZ,PHD

RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY

Page 4 of 4