NCR 882 - Sagittar

CERTIFICATE OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY
This is to certify the structural stability of the Parapet wall/s that are affected by the inclusion
of wall mounted setup carrying antennas of Globe Telecoms Network Inc. Also, the steel framing setup
of the wall mounts and the affected region due to the weight of the Outdoor cabinets are part of this
certification. The said inclusions are post constructed and are located at the uppermost roof-deck of the
building.
Structural appraisal involves site visit and/or visual inspection to ensure the added structures have
no visual damage that might affect its longevity and its users. Also, the location of the said additions was
identified to measure the “As-built” structural elements as well as the existing concrete elements of the
structure directly affected by the added loadings for structural investigation purposes.
Estimation or calculation needed to produce this output are all based on the standard and code
mandated by the law and by the profession of Civil Engineering in the Philippines. Here lies the references
used for the analysis extracted from the National Structural code of the Philippines 2015 (NSCP2015,
SEVENTH EDITION, VOLUME I):
• American Concrete Standard (ACI-318M)

• American Institute for Steel Construction (AISC360-16)
• American National Standard Institute (ANSI EIA/TIA-222-G.I.-2007)
• American Society of Civil Engineer (ASCE 7-22) for WIND LOAD ANALYSIS
Based on the reaction/s at the base of the added structures of Globe Telecoms networks, the weight it
would incur on the structure is much smaller compared with the design loading of the area affected by this
said inclusion. Therefore, the inclusion would not be going to affect the building’s structural stability
and is deemed safe and posts no danger to the user of the building. More importantly, the connection
between the masonry parapet wall and the steel framing setup is also deemed safe for possible
detachment and pry out.
However, additional loadings due to alteration of the structure and improper usage outside the
jurisdiction of the code/s stated above are beyond the scope and responsibility of the undersigned.Moreover,
poor workmanship, modification, and construction are beyond the jurisdiction of the engineer involved
with the assessment of the structural stability of the existing building and outsidethe scope of this report.
1
Note: This structural investigation report shall not be construed as part of the construction
documents. This is prepared for information purposes only. This report contains the results of
the investigation into the structure.
AVAILABLE DATA
The engineers have gathered available data which will be used for analysis such as
As-built architectural and structural drawings of the building provided by the owner, and
actual conditions based on ocular inspection. The material properties and other design
considerations have been provided by the client and have been used as the basis for the
structural investigation.
Commentary: Lessor did not provide any data regarding their building. The design
checking was done only for the structural properties, and elements of the wall mounted
antennas. The dimensions of the affected region were measured on-site for assurance and
checking of hairline cracking through the wall. However, material specifications and
properties of the existing residential building are assumed to be at the most conservative
way (ex. Masonry strength). However, this type of post installed infrastructure does not
have the capacity to destabilize the building’s structural framing system but is important
to be assessed for possible failure, especially its anchorage.
2
LIMITATION OF THIS DOCUMENT
This review presented herein is intended for the project entitled PROJECT
UNIVESE (PROJECT U) by Globe Telecoms Network located at SAGITTARIUS
BUILDING, H.V. DELA COSTA ST., SALCEDO VILLAGE, MAKATI CITY. The
existing structure is owned by SAGITTARIUS CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION.
This document shall be read in conjunction with the following documents:
a. As-built drawings signed by the engineer in charge of the project
construction.
b. Structural and or soil investigation results
c. National Structural Code of the Philippines, 7th Ed. 2015
d. Other building codes specified in the design criteria
Should there be any inconsistencies; the precedence shall be as follows:
a. As-built drawings of the structure
b. National Structural Code of the Philippines, 7th Ed. 2015
c. The structural investigation results.
3
I. INTRODUCTION
This report covers the structural investigation for the structural elements that are
affected by the inclusion of Eight (8) wall mounted antennas, and Outdoor equipment
cabinets that are situated in a concrete pedestal. Wall mounts framing setup/s are consisting
of Pipe3SCH40 (3.5” Outer Diameter, 0.20” Wall Thickness) for its main framing pole that
is supporting the steel connectors or appurtenances that consists of U-bolts, Steel plates,
and Pipe1-1/2SCH40 (1.90” Outer Diameter, 0.14” Wall Thickness), and so on (see
Structural plan for further details). The said wall mounting setups are connected to the wall
parapets of the building through anchor bolts that are post installed. The base plates are
built up shapes consisting of Flat plates of specific thickness with the properties of ASTM-
A36. This said material specifications and dimensions are observed upon the day of
inspection.
Figure 1. Highlighted above the shown picture are the Wall mounted antennas owned by Globe Telecoms Network
Inc., Yellow outlined portion is the Critical wall mounted setup that will be analyze in this report.
4
The self-weight of equipment inclinedly attached, appurtenances, and other
attachments that are not part of the main framing system of the pole are extracted from the
manufacturer’s provided mechanical property manual (ex. Antenna weight).
For the performance of the analysis, the dimension of the concerned structural members
is measured upon the day of inspection and made sure that there are no early indications of
failure such as hairline cracking (that is not due to thermal changes) and improper weld of
two adjoining steel members. AISC LRFD will be used as method of adequacy checking
for the steel members, ACI318-19M for anchorage through a masonry wall, anchor bolts
adequacy, and finite element analysis for checking of base plates, stiffener plates, and
welds.
The aim of the report was to provide adequate justification for ensuring the structural
stability of the added structure by Globe Telecoms Network inc., and the affected structural
elements due to this said inclusion. Considerations for the possible loadings that may cause
failure are as follows; (1) Due to gravity loads, (2) Due to wind loads, (3) Combination of such
loadings and load factors. The parameters for such loadings especially for (2) and (3) are
extracted from the National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015 (NSCP, 2015) and
ASCE7-22 (MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS AND ASSOCIATED CRITERIA FOR
BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES).
5
To fulfill the objective, step by step procedure in chronological order are carried out:
1. Inspection and gathering of data.
2. Computer Aided Design (CAD) for layout
3. Load computation with the aid of Microsoft office
4. Structural Aided analysis of the framing and recommendation
6
II. INPUTS
On this part of the report, the inputs such as code-based parameters, engineering
judgement or computation, would be discussed and certify with the assurance and
justification that each structural member would or would not meet the desired requirements.
Regarding the structural steel members, strength design method (AISC LRFD) was deemed
efficient and up to date as a method of design adequacy checking as it provides more
adequacy checking than Allowable stress design (ASD) based on the design software use
for the base plates and concrete pedestal (HILTI PROFIS ENGINEERING).
For the computation of dead-load due to self-weight of the attached equipment,
extracted mechanical data from the manufacturer’s manual was used and is converted into
desired units and load of transfer going through the main framing system of the pole through
the masonry wall. For the wind-load, extracted data are from combinations of National
Structural Code of the Philippines 2015 (NSCP, 2015) code-based design and Minimum
Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structure (ASCE/SEI
7-22). There are several type of infrastructure that the added wall mounted setup can be
considered, however, the steel pole framing setup fits the criteria for Section.207D.4.2.
SOLID ATTACHED SIGNS of NSCP 2015. The said governing codes and procedural
approaches are manually deciphered by the engineer in-charge of this analysis and was
computed through the help of Microsoft office (excel) software. Formulas used, and
criteria for judgement will be discussed further in this report.
7
MATERIAL PROPERTIES (Parapet wall)
Specified Compressive Strength of Concrete Masonry Unit, fm’ = 1500 Psi or 10.30 Mpa
MATERIAL PROPERTIES (Structural steel members)
Yield strength of Structural steel, Fy = 248 Mpa (ASTM - A36) for all Prefabricated steel
members except anchor bolts. CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO
DATA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER
Ultimate strength of Structural steel, Fu = 400 Mpa (ASTM - A36) CONSERVATIVE
ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO DATA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER
Tensile strength of Weld electrode, Fyw = 413 Mpa (E60XX) CONSERVATIVE
ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO DATA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER
II.I. PARAMETER FOR WIND ANALYSIS (FOR STEEL
FRAMING SYSTEM)
DESCRIPTION VALUE UNITS REMARKS
Open signs and

STRUCTURE TYPE single-plane -
open frames
All other cross

SUB STRUCTURE/CROSS SECTION
sections
RISK CATEGORY IV -
Exposure Category B -
BASIC WIND SPEED 260 kmph
Ground elevation above sea level, Ze 12 m
Height of the building structure, z or h 54 m
Width of the building structure normal to the

8.7 m
direction of the wind, B
Gross area of the building structure normal to the

469.8 sq.m.
direction of the wind, Bh
Height of the rooftop structure normal to the

2.099 m
direction of the wind, s
8
Width of the rooftop structure normal to the
0.409 m
direction of the wind, w
Vertical Projected Area of the Rooftop structure or

1.317031 sq.m. NET AREA
equipment normal to the direction of the wind, Af
Gross area of a plane normal to the direction of the

1.317031 sq.m. GROSS AREA
wind, Ag
WIND DIRECTIONALITY FACTOR, Kd 0.85 -

Velocity Pressure Coefficients, Kz 0.799407843 -
Topographic Factor, Kzt 1 - Use 1.0 for conservative approach
Ground Elevation Factor, Ke 0.998573019 - Use 1.0 for conservative approach
Rigid building or other structures are permitted to be

Gust-effect factor, G 0.85 - taken as 0.85,except for rooftop equipments and
ground-mounted fixed-tilt solar panel system
Combined Factor, GCr 1.9 - Factor for rooftop equipment
Force Coefficients, Cf 1.855 - SOLID FREESTANDING SIGNS
Ratio of Solid are to the Gross area (Af/Ag), ε 1 -

Clearance Ratio, s/h 0.03887037 -
APPLICABLE FOR ONLY CASE A AND B
Aspect Ratio, B/s 0.194854693 -
Round member
Diameter of a typical round member, D 0.0889 m
N/A
Velocity pressure, qz or qh 35.34105859 N/sq.m.
Design wind force, F 62.38171594 N
Area normal to
Plane normal Height or Depth Length of Design Wind
Material the wind Force
Description to direction of of the member's the member Force, F'
Geometry direction, Af' multiplier
the wind face (m.) (m.) (kN/m)
(sq.m.)
PIPE3SCH40 Y-Z Channel 0.0889 3.5 0.31115 0.165778942

CH5 Y-Z Channel 0.05 0.75 0.0375 0.035524059
CH5 Y-Z Channel 0.05 0.75 0.0375 0.035524059
PIPE1-
Y-Z Channel 0.04826 1.5 0.07239 0.071048118
1/2SCH40
Σ(Af) 1.317031
9
Table 26.10-1. Velocity Pressure Coefficients, Kh and Kz.
Height above Ground level, z or h Exposure

ft m B C D
0 0 0.57 0.7 0.85 1.03
15 4.6 0.57 0.7 0.85 1.03
20 6.1 0.62 0.7 0.9 1.08
25 7.6 0.66 0.7 0.94 1.12
30 9.1 0.7 0.7 0.98 1.16
40 12.2 0.74 0.74 1.04 1.22
50 15.2 0.79 0.79 1.09 1.27
60 18.3 0.83 0.83 1.13 1.31
70 21.3 0.86 0.86 1.17 1.34
80 24.4 0.9 0.9 1.21 1.38
90 27.44 0.92 0.92 1.24 1.4
100 30.5 0.95 0.95 1.26 1.43
120 36.6 1 1 1.31 1.48
140 42.7 1.04 1.04 1.34 1.52
160 48.8 1.08 1.08 1.39 1.55
180 54.9 1.11 1.11 1.41 1.58
200 61 1.14 1.14 1.44 1.61
250 76.2 1.21 1.21 1.51 1.68
300 91.4 1.27 1.27 1.57 1.73
350 106.7 1.33 1.33 1.62 1.78
400 121.9 1.38 1.38 1.66 1.82
450 137.2 1.42 1.42 1.7 1.86
500 152.4 1.46 1.46 1.74 1.89
Force Coefficients, Cf, for Case A and Case B
Aspec Ratio, B/s

Clearance Ratio, s/h
</=0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 4 5 10 20 30 >/=45
1 1.8 1.7 1.65 1.55 1.45 1.4 1.35 1.35 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
0.9 1.85 1.75 1.7 1.6 1.55 1.5 1.45 1.45 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
0.7 1.9 1.85 1.75 1.7 1.65 1.6 1.6 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55
0.5 1.95 1.85 1.8 1.75 1.75 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.75
0.3 1.95 1.9 1.85 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.85 1.85 1.85
10
0.2 1.95 1.9 1.85 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.85 1.9 1.9 1.95
</=0.16 1.95 1.9 1.85 1.85 1.8 1.8 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.9 1.9 1.95
Force Coefficients, Cf
Rounded Members
ε Flat-sided Members
D*sqrt(qz)</=5.3 D*sqrt(qz)>5.3
<0.1 2 1.2 0.8

0.1 to 0.29 1.8 1.3 0.9
0.3 to 0.7 1.6 1.5 1.1
Figure 2. Shown above is the force direction due to wind-load targeting the geometric center of the
structure.
11
II.II. LOAD COMBINATIONS
II.II.I. DEAD LOADS
DEAD LOAD
Pole
Pole Descripti Wei Un Staad Un Remark Length of the Pin Start End
Remarks length
No. on ght its inputs its s Connection (m) (m) (m)
(m)
ASI4515 0.2305 Membe 0.86 0.13
47 kg Packing Weight kN 1 1.273
R3v06 35 r load 35 65
0.0284 Membe 0.86 0.13
Clamps 5.8 kg (2 Units) kN 1 1.273
49 r load 35 65
Downtilt 0.0304 Membe 0.13
3.1 kg Model: ASMDTF01 kN 1 - -
Kit 11 r load 65
10% of the weight of the 0.0230 Membe 0.86 0.13
WIRINGS 4.7 kg kN 1 -
Antenna, assumed weight 535 r load 35 65
10% of the weight of the 0.2452 Membe
RRU5502 25 kg kN 1 - 0.5 -
Antenna, assumed weight 5 r load
10% of the weight of the 0.0245 Membe
P1 WIRINGS 2.5 kg kN 1 - 0.5 -
Antenna, assumed weight 25 r load
0.0304 Membe
Clamps 3.1 kg Model: ASMDTF01 kN 1 - 0.5 -
11 r load
Membe 0.10 0.89
AAU 40 kg Model: AAU5613 0.1962 kN 1 0.795
r load 25 75
0.0284 Membe 0.10 0.89
Clamps 5.8 kg Model: ASMDTF01 kN 1 -
49 r load 25 75
10% of the weight of the 0.0196 Membe 0.10 0.89
WIRINGS 4 kg kN 1 -
Antenna, assumed weight 2 r load 25 75
Appurte 0.0490 Nodal 0.10
5 kg Steel connection (U-bolt) kN 1 - -
nances 5 load 25
II.II.II. LOAD COMBINATIONS
1. 1.4DL
2. 1.2DL + 1.0 WL (PER DIRECTION)
Where:
DL = Dead loads
WL = Wind load
12
III. OUTPUTS
In this part of the analysis report, values obtained from running the analysis from
Staad Pro connect edition 6 V22, would be provided and indication whether each
concerned structural steel framing element would be adequate for its intended purpose.
Loads combination, consideration for base support, resisting factor such as releases for
end supports of each steel element, would also be shown for the reader to check the
correctness of the analysis. Aside from providing adequacy checks, Staad Pro connect
edition 6 V22 provided the base reaction of the concerned pole setup and is imported
through HILTI PROFIS ENGINEERING for design checking of the base support
element such as base plate, anchor bolts, base plate, stiffener plate, and other adequacy
checking for concrete previously mentioned.
13
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Software licensed to only @ ::LAVTeam:: (R) Part
CONNECTED User: User is not logged in to CONNECTION Client.
Job Title Ref
By Date09-Jun-23 Chd
Client File POLE.STD Date/Time 09-Jun-2023 14:21
Job Information
Engineer Checked Approved
Name:
Date: 09-Jun-23
Project ID
Project Name
Structure Type SPACE FRAME
Number of Nodes 11 Highest Node 13

Number of Elements 11 Highest Beam 11
Number of Basic Load Cases 4

Number of Combination Load Cases 2
Included in this printout are data for:

All The Whole Structure
Included in this printout are results for load cases:

Type L/C Name
Primary 1 DL
Primary 2 WL
Combination 3 1.4DL
Combination 4 1.2DL+1.0WL
3D Rendered View
Print Time/Date: 13/06/2023 14:37 STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 22.06.00.138 Print Run 1 of 6
14
Job No Sheet No Rev
2
Job Title Ref
Y
X
Z
Load 1
Whole Structure
Materials
Mat Name E  Density 
(kN/mm2) (kg/m3) (/°C)
1 STEEL 205.000 0.300 7.83E+3 12E -6
2 CONCRETE 21.718 0.170 2.4E+3 10E -6
3 ALUMINUM 68.948 0.330 2.71E+3 23E -6
4 STAINLESSSTEEL 197.930 0.300 7.83E+3 18E -6
5 STEEL_36_KSI 199.948 0.300 7.83E+3 11.7E -6
6 STEEL_50_KSI 199.948 0.300 7.83E+3 11.7E -6
7 STEEL_275_NMM2 205.000 0.300 7.85E+3 12E -6
8 STEEL_355_NMM2 205.000 0.300 7.85E+3 12E -6
Section Properties
Prop Section Area Iyy Izz J Material
(m2) (in4) (in4) (in4)
1 PIPS30 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.689 STEEL
2 PIPS15 0.000 0.293 0.293 0.586 STEEL
3 CH5 0.001 0.199 0.625 0.022 STEEL
Supports
Node X Y Z rX rY rZ
(kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg)
1 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed
2 Fixed - Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed
15
Job No Sheet No Rev
3
Job Title Ref
Reference Load Cases

Number Name Type
R1 WWX None
R2 EQUIPMENTS Dead
Primary Load Cases

Number Name Type
1 DL Dead
2 WL Wind
Combination Load Cases

Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary Primary L/C Name Factor
3 1.4DL 1 DL 1.40
4 1.2DL+1.0WL 1 DL 1.20
2 WL 1.00
16
Job No Sheet No Rev
4
Job Title Ref
Steel Design (Track 2) Beam 1 Check 1

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Member No: 1 Profile: ST PIPS30 (AISC SECTIONS)|
Status: PASS Ratio: 0.010 Loadcase: 3 |
Location: 0.00 Ref: Cl.E3 |
Pz: 2.832 C Vy: 0.1558E-09 Vx: 0.2655E-08 |
Tz: -.1380E-23 My: -.3967E-09 Mx: 0.2329E-10 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Location: 0.00 Ref: Eq.H1-1b |
Pz: 2.366 C Vy: 0.5743 Vx: 0.5128E-12 |
Tz: -.8925E-01 My: 0.5369 Mx: 0.7263 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Pz: 0.4365 C Vy: 0.8289E-01 Vx: -.4733E-14 |
Tz: 0.000 My: 0.1447E-14 Mx: 0.2072E-01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Pz: 0.9017 C Vy: 0.2972 Vx: -.1636 |
Tz: -.3216E-01 My: 0.2598 Mx: 0.2348 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Member No: 5 Profile: ST CH5 (CHINESE SECTIO|S)
Pz: 0.1636 T Vy: 0.2832 Vx: 0.4855E-01 |
Tz: -.2458E-03 My: -.3216E-01 Mx: 0.9619E-01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Pz: 0.1636 C Vy: 0.5834 Vx: 0.1113 |
Tz: 0.1124E-03 My: -.5710E-01 Mx: 0.2771 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Pz: 0.000 T Vy: 0.6384E-02 Vx: 0.3552E-02 |
Tz: 0.000 My: -.1776E-03 Mx: 0.3192E-03 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Member No: 8 Profile: ST CH5 (CHINESE SECTIO|S
17
Job No Sheet No Rev
5
Job Title Ref
| Status: PASS Ratio: 0.000 Loadcase: 4 |

Failed Members
There
Pz:is no data0.000
of this type. T Vy: 0.6384E-02 Vx: 0.3552E-02 |
Tz: 0.000 My: -.1776E-03 Mx: 0.3192E-03 |
Utilization Ratio
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Beam
Member No:Analysis 9 Design Profile:
Actual Allowable
ST PIPS15Ratio Clause (AISC
L/CSECTIONS)|
Ax Iz Iy Ix
2
Status: Property PASS Property Ratio
Ratio: Ratio (Act./Allow.)
0.087 Loadcase: (m
3 ) | (in4) (in4) (in4)
1 PIPS30
Location: 0.00PIPS30 0.010
Ref: 1.000
Eq.H1-1b 0.010 Cl.E3 3 0.001 | 2.850 2.850 5.700
2
Pz: PIPS30
0.5410 PIPS30
C Vy:0.162 1.000
0.3612E-01 0.162 Eq.H1-1b
Vx: 4
0.1914 0.001 | 2.850 2.850 5.700
3
Tz: PIPS30
0.1998E-02 PIPS30 My:0.003 1.000
-.1037 0.003 Eq.H1-1b
Mx: 0.2619E-010.001 |
4 2.850 2.850 5.700
4 PIPS30 PIPS30 0.063 1.000 0.063 Eq.H1-1b
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| 4 0.001 2.850 2.850 5.700
5 CH5 CH5 0.060 1.000 0.060 Eq.H1-1b
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| 4 0.001 0.625 0.199 0.022
6 CH5
Member No: CH5
10 0.144 1.000
Profile: ST PIPS15 0.144 Eq.H1-1b 4 0.001
(AISC SECTIONS)| 0.625 0.199 0.022
7
Status: CH5 PASSCH5 0.000
Ratio: 1.000 0.001 0.000 Eq.H1-1b
Loadcase: 4 40.001 | 0.625 0.199 0.022
8 CH5
Location: 0.00CH5 0.000
Ref: 1.000
Eq.H1-1b 0.000 Eq.H1-1b 4 0.001 | 0.625 0.199 0.022
9
Pz: PIPS15
0.1114E-01 C PIPS15 Vy:0.087 1.000
0.1776E-01 0.087 Eq.H1-1b
Vx: 0.3691E-140.000 |
3 0.293 0.293 0.586
10
Tz: PIPS15
0.1101E-15 PIPS15 My:0.001 1.000
-.3258E-15 0.001 Eq.H1-1b
Mx: 4
0.2220E-02 0.000 | 0.293 0.293 0.586
11 PIPS15 PIPS15 0.001 1.000 0.001 Eq.H1-1b
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| 4 0.000 0.293 0.293 0.586
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Pz: 0.1114E-01 T Vy: -.1776E-01 Vx: -.1389E-15 |
Tz: 0.7879E-16 My: 0.6786E-15 Mx: -.2220E-02 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
18
Job No Sheet No Rev
6
Job Title Ref
Reactions
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment
Node L/C FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
1 1:DL -0.000 2.023 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000
2:WL -0.041 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0.003
3:1.4DL -0.000 2.832 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.000
4:1.2DL+1.0WL -0.041 2.427 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.003
2 1:DL 0.000 0 -0.000 -0.447 -0.000 -0.026
2:WL -0.616 0 -0.000 0.000 -0.089 0.754
3:1.4DL 0.000 0 -0.000 -0.626 -0.000 -0.037
4:1.2DL+1.0WL -0.616 0 -0.000 -0.537 -0.089 0.723
19
Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.85
www.hilti.com
Company: Power Acts Network Inc. Page: 1
Address: Upper Ground 6 Cityland Herrera Towers, V.A. Rufin Specifier: Aldrin Jonas
Phone I Fax: 09175602146 | E-Mail: ajdeduarte.poweracts@gmail.com
Design: Masonry - Jun 9, 2023 (4) Date: 6/9/2023
Fastening point:
Specifier's comments:
1 Input data
Anchor type and diameter: HY 100 + threaded rod 5.8 1/2
Item number: 333190 HAS-E 1/2"x6 1/2" (element) / 2078494 HIT-HY
100 (adhesive)
Effective embedment depth: hef = 12.00 cm
Material: 5.8
Evaluation Service Report: ER-547
Issued I Valid: 12/1/2022 | 5/31/2023
Proof: Design Method LRFD (AC58) Masonry + ACI 318-14
Stand-off installation: eb = 0.00 cm (no stand-off); t = 0.90 cm
Anchor plate :
R lx x ly x t = 30.00 cm x 30.00 cm x 0.90 cm; (Recommended plate thickness: not calculated)
Profile: no profile
Base material: 2
cracked Grout-filled CMU, f=1500, f = 10,340.00 kN/m , L x W x H: 40.64 cm x 20.32 cm x 20.32 cm;
Solid Head Joint: yes; open ended unit: yes
Temp. short/long: 0 °C / 0 °C
Joints: vertical: 0.95 cm; horizontal: 0.95 cm
Installation: Face installation, Drill hole: Hammer drilled, Installation condition: Dry
R
- The anchor calculation is based on a rigid anchor plate assumption.
Geometry [cm]
Input data and results must be checked for conformity with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Engineering ( c ) 2003-2023 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan
20
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
Geometry [cm] & Loading [kN, kNm]
1.1 Load combination and design results

Case Description Forces [kN] / Moments [kNm] Seismic Max. Util. Anchor [%]
1 DL N = 0.000; Vx = 0.000; Vy = -2.023; no 5
Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
2 WL N = 0.000; Vx = 0.041; Vy = 0.000; no 1

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = -0.003;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
3 1.4DL N = 0.000; Vx = 0.000; Vy = -2.832; no 7

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.000;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
4 1.2DL+1.0WL N = 0.000; Vx = 0.041; Vy = -2.427; no 6

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.000; Mz = -0.003;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
21
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
2 Load case/Resulting anchor forces y
Controlling load case: 3 1.4DL

3 4
Anchor reactions [kN]

Tension force: (+Tension, -Compression)
Anchor Tension force Shear force Shear force x Shear force y
x
1 0.000 0.708 0.000 -0.708
2 0.000 0.708 0.000 -0.708
3 0.000 0.708 0.000 -0.708
4 0.000 0.708 0.000 -0.708
1 2
max. concrete compressive strain: 0.00 [‰]
max. concrete compressive stress: 0.00 [kN/m ]
2
resulting tension force in (x/y)=(0.00/0.00): 0.000 [kN]

resulting compression force in (x/y)=(0.00/0.00): 0.000 [kN]
Anchor forces are calculated based on the assumption of a rigid anchor plate.
22
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
3 Shear load
Load [kN] Capacity [kN] Utilization bV [%] Status
Steel 0.708 16.480 5 OK
Pryout bond 2.832 46.230 7 OK
Masonry crushing strength 0.708 13.084 6 OK
Masonry breakout in direction y- 2.832 48.083 6 OK
3.1 Steel strength
Vsa = ESR value refer to ICC-ES ER-547

f Vsa ³ Vua AC58 Table 3.2 + ACI 318-14 Table 17.3.1.1
Vsa [kN] f f Vsa [kN] Vua [kN]

27.466 0.600 16.480 0.708
23
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
3.2 Pryout strength (Bond strength controls)
Vmpg =min(kcp · Nmag, kcp · Nmbg)

f Vmpg ³ Vua AC58 Table 3.2 + ACI 318-14 Table 17.3.1.1
ANa see ACI 318-14, Section 17.4.5.1, Fig. R 17.4.5.1(b)
2
ANa0 = (2 cNa) ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.1c)
t uncr,m
cNa = 10 da √ 1100
ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.1d)
( )
1
'
y ec,Na = eN £ 1.0 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.3)
1+
cNa
y ed,Na = 0.7 + 0.3 (cc ) £ 1.0

a,min
ac
ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.4b)
Nba,m = l a · t cr,m · p · da · hef ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.2)
Variables
2
kcp da [cm] hef [cm] ca,min [cm] t cr,m [kN/m ]
2 1.27 12.00 31.75 1,724.25
asat atop ec1,N [cm] ec2,N [cm] la

1.000 1.000 0.00 0.00 1.000
Calculations
cNa [cm] ANa [mm ]
2
ANa0 [mm ]
2
y ed,Na y ec1,Na y ec2,Na
0.00 58,141 14,535 1.000 1.000 1.000
y cp,Na Nba,m [kN]

1.000 8.255
Results
Vmpg [kN] f f Vmpg [kN] Vua [kN]
66.043 0.700 46.230 2.832
3.3 Masonry crushing strength
f Vmc ³ Vua AC58 Table 3.2

1
4
Vmc = 1750 · (f'm · Ase,V) AC58 Eq. 3-1
Variables
' 2 2
fm [kN/m ] Ase,v [mm ]
10,340.00 55
Results
Vmc [kN] f f Vmc [kN] Vua [kN]
26.167 0.500 13.084 0.708
24
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
3.4 Masonry breakout strength y-
Vmbg = (AA ) y
Vm
Vm0
ec,V,m y ed,V,m y c,V,m y h,V,m y parallel,V Vb,m ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.1b)
f Vmbg ³ Vua AC58 Table 3.2 + ACI 318-14 Table 17.3.1.1
AVm see ACI 318-14, Section 17.5.2.1, Fig. R 17.5.2.1(b)
2
AVm0 = 4.5 ca1 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.1c)
( )
1
'
y ec,V,m = 2ev £ 1.0 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.5)
1+
3ca1
y ed,V,m = 0.7 + 0.3 (1.5c

c
) £ 1.0
a2
a1
ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.6b)
y h,V,m = √1.5ch ³ 1.0a

a1
ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.8)
= (7 ( ) √ d ) l
0.2
l
Vb,m e
a a √f'm c1.5
a1 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.2a)
d a
Variables
2 2 ' 2
le [cm] da [cm] ca1 [cm] ca2 [cm] AVm [mm ] AVm0 [mm ] fm [kN/m ]
10.16 1.27 82.55 31.75 1,132,256 3,066,526 10,340.00
Calculations
y ed,V,m y parallel,V ec,V [cm] y ec,V,m y m,V y h,V,m
0.777 1.000 0.00 1.000 1.000 1.000
Results
Vb,m [kN] f f Vmbg [kN] Vua [kN]
239.449 0.700 48.083 2.832
25
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
4 Warnings
• The anchor design methods in PROFIS Engineering require rigid anchor plates per current regulations (AS 5216:2021, ETAG 001/Annex C,
EOTA TR029 etc.). This means load re-distribution on the anchors due to elastic deformations of the anchor plate are not considered - the
anchor plate is assumed to be sufficiently stiff, in order not to be deformed when subjected to the design loading. PROFIS Engineering calculates
the minimum required anchor plate thickness with CBFEM to limit the stress of the anchor plate based on the assumptions explained above. The
proof if the rigid anchor plate assumption is valid is not carried out by PROFIS Engineering. Input data and results must be checked for
agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
• Refer to the manufacturer's product literature for cleaning and installation instructions.
• For additional information about ACI 318 strength design provisions, please go to https://submittals.us.hilti.com/PROFISAnchorDesignGuide/
• The min. sizes of the bricks, the masonry compressive strength, the type / strength of the mortar and the grout (in case of fully grouted CMU
walls) has to fulfill the requirements given in the relevant ESR-approval or in the PTG.
• Only the local load transfer from the anchor(s) to the wall is considered, a further load transfer in the wall is not covered by PROFIS!
• Wall is assumed as being perfectly aligned vertically – checking required(!): Noncompliance can lead to significantly different distribution of forces
and higher tension loads than those calculated by PROFIS. Masonry wall must not have any damages (neither visible nor not visible)! While
installation, the positioning of the anchors needs to be maintained as in the design phase i.e. either relative to the brick or relative to the mortar
joints.
• The effect of the joints on the compressive stress distribution on the plate / bricks was not taken into consideration.
• If no significant resistance is felt over the entire depth of the hole when drilling (e.g. in unfilled butt joints), the anchor should not be set at this
position or the area should be assessed and reinforced. Hilti recommends the anchoring in masonry always with sieve sleeve. Anchors can only
be installed without sieve sleeves in solid bricks when it is guaranteed that it has not any hole or void.
• The accessories and installation remarks listed on this report are for the information of the user only. In any case, the instructions for use
provided with the product have to be followed to ensure a proper installation.
• The compliance with current standards (e.g. 2018, 2015, 2012, 2009 and 2006 IBC) is the responsibility of the user.
• Drilling method (hammer, rotary) to be in accordance with the approval!
• Masonry needs to be built in a regular way in accordance with state-of the art guidelines!
• /
Fastening meets the design criteria!
26
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
5 Installation data
2
Anchor plate, steel: ASTM A36; E = 199,947,970.00 kN/m ; fyk = 248,211.00 Anchor type and diameter: HY 100 + threaded rod 5.8 1/2
2
kN/m
Profile: no profile Item number: 333190 HAS-E 1/2"x6 1/2" (element) /
2078494 HIT-HY 100 (adhesive)
Hole diameter in the fixture: df = 1.43 cm Maximum installation torque: 0.041 kNm
Plate thickness (input): 0.90 cm Hole diameter in the base material: 1.43 cm
Recommended plate thickness: not calculated Hole depth in the base material: 12.00 cm
Drilling method: Drilled in hammer mode Minimum thickness of the base material: 19.37 cm
Cleaning: No cleaning of the drilled hole is required
Hilti HIT-V threaded rod with HIT-HY 100 injection mortar with 12 cm embedment h_ef, 1/2, Steel galvanized, Hammer drilled installation per
ER-547
y
15.00 15.00
6.11
3 4
15.00
17.78
x
15.00
1 2
6.11
6.11 17.78 6.11
Coordinates Anchor [cm]

Anchor x y c-x c+x c-y c+y
1 -8.89 -8.89 41.91 49.53 82.55 100.33
2 8.89 -8.89 59.69 31.75 82.55 100.33
3 -8.89 8.89 41.91 49.53 100.33 82.55
4 8.89 8.89 59.69 31.75 100.33 82.55
27
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
6 Remarks; Your Cooperation Duties

• Any and all information and data contained in the Software concern solely the use of Hilti products and are based on the principles, formulas and
security regulations in accordance with Hilti's technical directions and operating, mounting and assembly instructions, etc., that must be strictly
complied with by the user. All figures contained therein are average figures, and therefore use-specific tests are to be conducted prior to using
the relevant Hilti product. The results of the calculations carried out by means of the Software are based essentially on the data you put in.
Therefore, you bear the sole responsibility for the absence of errors, the completeness and the relevance of the data to be put in by you.
Moreover, you bear sole responsibility for having the results of the calculation checked and cleared by an expert, particularly with regard to
compliance with applicable norms and permits, prior to using them for your specific facility. The Software serves only as an aid to interpret norms
and permits without any guarantee as to the absence of errors, the correctness and the relevance of the results or suitability for a specific
application.
• You must take all necessary and reasonable steps to prevent or limit damage caused by the Software. In particular, you must arrange for the
regular backup of programs and data and, if applicable, carry out the updates of the Software offered by Hilti on a regular basis. If you do not use
the AutoUpdate function of the Software, you must ensure that you are using the current and thus up-to-date version of the Software in each
case by carrying out manual updates via the Hilti Website. Hilti will not be liable for consequences, such as the recovery of lost or damaged data
or programs, arising from a culpable breach of duty by you.
28
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
Specifier's comments:
1 Input data
Anchor type and diameter: HY 100 + threaded rod 5.8 1/2
Item number: 333190 HAS-E 1/2"x6 1/2" (element) / 2078494 HIT-HY
100 (adhesive)
Effective embedment depth: hef = 12.00 cm
Material: 5.8
Evaluation Service Report: ER-547
Issued I Valid: 12/1/2022 | 5/31/2023
Proof: Design Method LRFD (AC58) Masonry + ACI 318-14
Stand-off installation: eb = 0.00 cm (no stand-off); t = 0.90 cm
Anchor plate :
R lx x ly x t = 30.00 cm x 30.00 cm x 0.90 cm; (Recommended plate thickness: not calculated)
Profile: no profile
Base material: 2
cracked Grout-filled CMU, f=1500, f = 10,340.00 kN/m , L x W x H: 40.64 cm x 20.32 cm x 20.32 cm;
Solid Head Joint: yes; open ended unit: yes
Temp. short/long: 0 °C / 0 °C
Joints: vertical: 0.95 cm; horizontal: 0.95 cm
Installation: Face installation, Drill hole: Hammer drilled, Installation condition: Dry
R
- The anchor calculation is based on a rigid anchor plate assumption.
Geometry [cm]
29
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
Geometry [cm] & Loading [kN, kNm]
1.1 Load combination and design results

Case Description Forces [kN] / Moments [kNm] Seismic Max. Util. Anchor [%]
1 DL N = 0.000; Vx = 0.000; Vy = 0.000; no 24
Mx = 0.447; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.026;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
2 WL N = 0.000; Vx = 0.616; Vy = 0.000; no 14

Mx = 0.000; My = 0.089; Mz = -0.754;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
3 1.4DL N = 0.000; Vx = 0.000; Vy = 0.000; no 33

Mx = 0.626; My = 0.000; Mz = 0.037;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
4 1.2DL+1.0WL N = 0.000; Vx = 0.616; Vy = 0.000; no 31

Mx = 0.537; My = 0.089; Mz = -0.723;
Nsus = 0.000; Mx,sus = 0.000; My,sus = 0.000;
30
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
2 Load case/Resulting anchor forces y
Controlling load case: 3 1.4DL

3 4
Tension
Anchor reactions [kN]
Tension force: (+Tension, -Compression)
Anchor Tension force Shear force Shear force x Shear force y
x
1 0.000 0.074 0.052 -0.052
2 0.000 0.074 0.052 0.052
3 1.467 0.074 -0.052 -0.052
4 1.467 0.074 -0.052 0.052
1 2
max. concrete compressive strain: 0.03 [‰]
max. concrete compressive stress: 254.98 [kN/m ]
2
resulting tension force in (x/y)=(0.00/8.89): 2.934 [kN] Compression

resulting compression force in (x/y)=(0.00/-12.44): 2.934 [kN]
Anchor forces are calculated based on the assumption of a rigid anchor plate.
3 Tension load
Load [kN] Capacity [kN] Utilization bN [%] Status
Steel 1.467 29.750 5 OK
Bond 2.934 8.918 33 OK
Masonry breakout 2.934 20.612 15 OK
3.1 Steel strength
Nsa = ESR value refer to ICC-ES ER-547

f Nsa ³ Nua AC58 Table 3.2 + ACI 318-14 Table 17.3.1.1
Nsa [kN] f f Nsa [kN] Nua [kN]

45.770 0.650 29.750 1.467
31
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
3.2 Bond strength
Nmag = (AA ) · y
Na0
Na
ec1,Na · y ec2,Na · y ed,Na · Nba,m ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.1b)
f Nmag ³ Nua AC58 Table 3.2 + ACI 318-14 Table 17.3.1.1
2
ANa0 = (2 cNa) ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.1c)
t uncr,m
cNa = 10 da √ 1100
ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.1d)
( )
1
'
y ec,Na = eN £ 1.00 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.3)
1+
cNa
y ed,Na = 0.7 + 0.3 (cc ) £ 1.00

a,min
Na
ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.4b)
Variables
da [cm] hef [cm] ca,min [cm] t cr,m [kN/m ]
2
asat atop
1.27 12.00 31.75 1,724.25 1.000 1.000
ec1,N [cm] ec2,N [cm] la

0.00 0.00 1.000
Calculations
cNa [cm] ANa [mm ]
2
ANa0 [mm ]
2
y ed,Na
9.22 66,804 34,013 1.000
y ec1,Na y ec2,Na Nba,m [kN]

1.000 1.000 8.255
Results
Nmag [kN] f f Nmag [kN] f Nua [kN]
16.214 0.550 8.918 2.934
32
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
3.3 Masonry breakout strength
ANm
Nmbg = · y ec,N,m y ed,N,m · y c,N,m · Nb,m ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.2.1b)
ANm0
f Nmbg ³ Nua AC58 Table 3.2 + ACI 318-14 Table 17.3.1.1
ANm see ACI 318-14, Section 17.4.2.1, Fig. R 17.4.2.1(b)
2
ANm0 = 9 · hef ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.2.1c)
( )
1
'
y ec,N,m = 2 eN £ 1.00 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.2.4)
1+
3 · hef
c
y ed,N = 0.7 + 0.3 a,min £ 1.0 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.2.5b)
1.5 · hef
1.5
Nb,m = km · l a · √ '
fm · hef ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.2.2a)
Variables
hef [cm] ec1,N,m [cm] ec2,N,m [cm] ca,min [cm] y c,N,m kc
12.00 0.00 0.00 31.75 1.000 12
' 2
la fm [kN/m ]
1.000 10,340.00
Calculations
ANm [mm ]
2
ANm0 [mm ]
2
y ec1,N,m y ec2,N,m y ed,N,m Nb,m [kN]
193,608 129,600 1.000 1.000 1.000 21.227
Results
Nmbg [kN] f f Nmbg [kN] Nua [kN]
31.711 0.650 20.612 2.934
33
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
4 Shear load
Load [kN] Capacity [kN] Utilization bV [%] Status
Steel 0.074 16.480 1 OK
Pryout bond 0.074 11.557 1 OK
Masonry crushing strength 0.074 13.084 1 OK
Masonry breakout in direction x+ 0.147 41.912 1 OK
4.1 Steel strength
Vsa = ESR value refer to ICC-ES ER-547

f Vsa ³ Vua AC58 Table 3.2 + ACI 318-14 Table 17.3.1.1
Vsa [kN] f f Vsa [kN] Vua [kN]

27.466 0.600 16.480 0.074
34
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
4.2 Pryout strength (Bond strength controls)
Vmpg =min(kcp · Nmag, kcp · Nmbg)

f Vmpg ³ Vua AC58 Table 3.2 + ACI 318-14 Table 17.3.1.1
2
ANa0 = (2 cNa) ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.1c)
t uncr,m
cNa = 10 da √ 1100
ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.1d)
( )
1
'
y ec,Na = eN £ 1.0 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.3)
1+
cNa
y ed,Na = 0.7 + 0.3 (cc ) £ 1.0

a,min
ac
ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.4.5.4b)
Variables
2
kcp da [cm] hef [cm] ca,min [cm] t cr,m [kN/m ]
2 1.27 12.00 31.75 1,724.25
asat atop ec1,N [cm] ec2,N [cm] la

1.000 1.000 0.00 0.00 1.000
Calculations
cNa [cm] ANa [mm ]
2
ANa0 [mm ]
2
y ed,Na y ec1,Na y ec2,Na
0.00 14,535 14,535 1.000 1.000 1.000
y cp,Na Nba,m [kN]

1.000 8.255
Results
Vmpg [kN] f f Vmpg [kN] Vua [kN]
16.511 0.700 11.557 0.074
4.3 Masonry crushing strength
f Vmc ³ Vua AC58 Table 3.2

1
4
Vmc = 1750 · (f'm · Ase,V) AC58 Eq. 3-1
Variables
' 2 2
fm [kN/m ] Ase,v [mm ]
10,340.00 55
Results
Vmc [kN] f f Vmc [kN] Vua [kN]
26.167 0.500 13.084 0.074
35
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
4.4 Masonry breakout strength x+
Vmbg = (AA ) y
Vm
Vm0
ec,V,m y ed,V,m y c,V,m y h,V,m y parallel,V Vb,m ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.1b)
f Vmbg ³ Vua AC58 Table 3.2 + ACI 318-14 Table 17.3.1.1
AVm see ACI 318-14, Section 17.5.2.1, Fig. R 17.5.2.1(b)
2
AVm0 = 4.5 ca1 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.1c)
( )
1
'
y ec,V,m = 2ev £ 1.0 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.5)
1+
3ca1
y ed,V,m = 0.7 + 0.3 (1.5c

c
) £ 1.0
a2
a1
ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.6b)
y h,V,m = √1.5ch ³ 1.0

a
a1
ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.8)
= (7 ( ) √ d ) l
0.2
l
Vb,m e
a a √f'm c1.5
a1 ACI 318-14 Eq. (17.5.2.2a)
d a
Variables
2 2 ' 2
le [cm] da [cm] ca1 [cm] ca2 [cm] AVm [mm ] AVm0 [mm ] fm [kN/m ]
10.16 1.27 31.75 82.55 538,305 453,628 10,340.00
Calculations
y ed,V,m y parallel,V ec,V [cm] y ec,V,m y m,V y h,V,m
1.000 1.000 6.29 0.883 1.000 1.000
Results
Vb,m [kN] f f Vmbg [kN] Vua [kN]
57.115 0.700 41.912 0.147
5 Required verifications under combined tension and shear forces

bN bV z Utilization bN,V [%] Status
0.329 0.006 5/3 16 OK
z z
bNV = bN + bV <= 1
36
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
6 Warnings
• The anchor design methods in PROFIS Engineering require rigid anchor plates per current regulations (AS 5216:2021, ETAG 001/Annex C,
EOTA TR029 etc.). This means load re-distribution on the anchors due to elastic deformations of the anchor plate are not considered - the
anchor plate is assumed to be sufficiently stiff, in order not to be deformed when subjected to the design loading. PROFIS Engineering calculates
the minimum required anchor plate thickness with CBFEM to limit the stress of the anchor plate based on the assumptions explained above. The
proof if the rigid anchor plate assumption is valid is not carried out by PROFIS Engineering. Input data and results must be checked for
agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
• Refer to the manufacturer's product literature for cleaning and installation instructions.
• For additional information about ACI 318 strength design provisions, please go to https://submittals.us.hilti.com/PROFISAnchorDesignGuide/
• The min. sizes of the bricks, the masonry compressive strength, the type / strength of the mortar and the grout (in case of fully grouted CMU
walls) has to fulfill the requirements given in the relevant ESR-approval or in the PTG.
• Only the local load transfer from the anchor(s) to the wall is considered, a further load transfer in the wall is not covered by PROFIS!
• Wall is assumed as being perfectly aligned vertically – checking required(!): Noncompliance can lead to significantly different distribution of forces
and higher tension loads than those calculated by PROFIS. Masonry wall must not have any damages (neither visible nor not visible)! While
installation, the positioning of the anchors needs to be maintained as in the design phase i.e. either relative to the brick or relative to the mortar
joints.
• The effect of the joints on the compressive stress distribution on the plate / bricks was not taken into consideration.
• If no significant resistance is felt over the entire depth of the hole when drilling (e.g. in unfilled butt joints), the anchor should not be set at this
position or the area should be assessed and reinforced. Hilti recommends the anchoring in masonry always with sieve sleeve. Anchors can only
be installed without sieve sleeves in solid bricks when it is guaranteed that it has not any hole or void.
• The accessories and installation remarks listed on this report are for the information of the user only. In any case, the instructions for use
provided with the product have to be followed to ensure a proper installation.
• The compliance with current standards (e.g. 2018, 2015, 2012, 2009 and 2006 IBC) is the responsibility of the user.
• Drilling method (hammer, rotary) to be in accordance with the approval!
• Masonry needs to be built in a regular way in accordance with state-of the art guidelines!
• /
Fastening meets the design criteria!
37
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
7 Installation data
2
Anchor plate, steel: ASTM A36; E = 199,947,970.00 kN/m ; fyk = 248,211.00 Anchor type and diameter: HY 100 + threaded rod 5.8 1/2
2
kN/m
Profile: no profile Item number: 333190 HAS-E 1/2"x6 1/2" (element) /
2078494 HIT-HY 100 (adhesive)
Hole diameter in the fixture: df = 1.43 cm Maximum installation torque: 0.041 kNm
Plate thickness (input): 0.90 cm Hole diameter in the base material: 1.43 cm
Recommended plate thickness: not calculated Hole depth in the base material: 12.00 cm
Drilling method: Drilled in hammer mode Minimum thickness of the base material: 19.37 cm
Cleaning: No cleaning of the drilled hole is required
Hilti HIT-V threaded rod with HIT-HY 100 injection mortar with 12 cm embedment h_ef, 1/2, Steel galvanized, Hammer drilled installation per
ER-547
y
15.00 15.00
6.11
3 4
15.00
17.78
x
15.00
1 2
6.11
6.11 17.78 6.11
Coordinates Anchor [cm]

Anchor x y c-x c+x c-y c+y
1 -8.89 -8.89 41.91 49.53 82.55 100.33
2 8.89 -8.89 59.69 31.75 82.55 100.33
3 -8.89 8.89 41.91 49.53 100.33 82.55
4 8.89 8.89 59.69 31.75 100.33 82.55
10
38
www.hilti.com
Fastening point:
8 Remarks; Your Cooperation Duties

• Any and all information and data contained in the Software concern solely the use of Hilti products and are based on the principles, formulas and
security regulations in accordance with Hilti's technical directions and operating, mounting and assembly instructions, etc., that must be strictly
complied with by the user. All figures contained therein are average figures, and therefore use-specific tests are to be conducted prior to using
the relevant Hilti product. The results of the calculations carried out by means of the Software are based essentially on the data you put in.
Therefore, you bear the sole responsibility for the absence of errors, the completeness and the relevance of the data to be put in by you.
Moreover, you bear sole responsibility for having the results of the calculation checked and cleared by an expert, particularly with regard to
compliance with applicable norms and permits, prior to using them for your specific facility. The Software serves only as an aid to interpret norms
and permits without any guarantee as to the absence of errors, the correctness and the relevance of the results or suitability for a specific
application.
• You must take all necessary and reasonable steps to prevent or limit damage caused by the Software. In particular, you must arrange for the
regular backup of programs and data and, if applicable, carry out the updates of the Software offered by Hilti on a regular basis. If you do not use
the AutoUpdate function of the Software, you must ensure that you are using the current and thus up-to-date version of the Software in each
case by carrying out manual updates via the Hilti Website. Hilti will not be liable for consequences, such as the recovery of lost or damaged data
or programs, arising from a culpable breach of duty by you.
11
39
V. DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS
The used of utilization ratio is to compare the designed capacity of the member in question to the
computed designed load that a particular member experienced. The load that a particular member is
compared to is the one that is governing. The utilization ratio for different modes of failure/s reaches
1.00 signifies that the designed actual computation is already at 100% designed capacity of the material
that was examined. As shown from the given data, the Prefabricated steel members were analyzed to
resist axial failure, torsional failure, and slenderness ratio adequacy throughout carrying different load
cases/load combination inputs. The maximum slenderness ratio for compression members is at 200 and
300 for tension members. Each structural member that was analyzed acts as compression member and
tension member at the different loading cases, thus checking for different maximum slenderness ratio
was performed. The Analysis and adequacy were performed for the Prefabricated steel members, Base
plate with Stiffener plates, Anchor bolts, and concrete pedestal below the base of the Floor mounted pole.
Based on the results, the floor mounted poles are deemed safe and adequate to carry out the loads imposed
on it. Another, based on the Use or Occupancy of the area where the equipment and wall mounted
antennas are located, the weight of the Outdoor cabinets does not exceed the live loadings for a roof deck.
40
APPENDICES
Here lie the references and pictures that were obtained upon the day of the inspection.
Figure 3. Front view of the building where the Figure 4. Wall mounted antennas
Antennas/Equipments are located.
Figure 5. Base plate connections Figure 6. Critical wall mounted framing setup
41

NCR 882 - Sagittar

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NCR 882 - Sagittar

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CERTIFICATE OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY

• American Concrete Standard (ACI-318M)

to be assessed for possible failure, especially its anchorage.

a. As-built drawings signed by the engineer in charge of the project

b. Structural and or soil investigation results

c. National Structural Code of the Philippines, 7th Ed. 2015

d. Other building codes specified in the design criteria

Should there be any inconsistencies; the precedence shall be as follows:

a. As-built drawings of the structure

b. National Structural Code of the Philippines, 7th Ed. 2015

c. The structural investigation results.

manufacturer’s provided mechanical property manual (ex. Antenna weight).

ASCE7-22 (MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS AND ASSOCIATED CRITERIA FOR

BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES).

1. Inspection and gathering of data.

2. Computer Aided Design (CAD) for layout

3. Load computation with the aid of Microsoft office

4. Structural Aided analysis of the framing and recommendation

efficient and up to date as a method of design adequacy checking as it provides more

For the computation of dead-load due to self-weight of the attached equipment,

criteria for judgement will be discussed further in this report.

MATERIAL PROPERTIES (Structural steel members)

members except anchor bolts. CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO

DATA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER

Ultimate strength of Structural steel, Fu = 400 Mpa (ASTM - A36) CONSERVATIVE

ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO DATA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER

Tensile strength of Weld electrode, Fyw = 413 Mpa (E60XX) CONSERVATIVE

ASSUMPTION SINCE THERE IS NO DATA PROVIDED BY THE OWNER

II.I. PARAMETER FOR WIND ANALYSIS (FOR STEEL

DESCRIPTION VALUE UNITS REMARKS

Open signs and

All other cross

Width of the building structure normal to the

Gross area of the building structure normal to the

Height of the rooftop structure normal to the

Vertical Projected Area of the Rooftop structure or

Gross area of a plane normal to the direction of the

WIND DIRECTIONALITY FACTOR, Kd 0.85 -

Rigid building or other structures are permitted to be

Combined Factor, GCr 1.9 - Factor for rooftop equipment

Force Coefficients, Cf 1.855 - SOLID FREESTANDING SIGNS

Ratio of Solid are to the Gross area (Af/Ag), ε 1 -

PIPE3SCH40 Y-Z Channel 0.0889 3.5 0.31115 0.165778942

Height above Ground level, z or h Exposure

Force Coefficients, Cf, for Case A and Case B

Aspec Ratio, B/s

</=0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 4 5 10 20 30 >/=45

<0.1 2 1.2 0.8

II.II.I. DEAD LOADS

II.II.II. LOAD COMBINATIONS

checking for concrete previously mentioned.

Client File POLE.STD Date/Time 09-Jun-2023 14:21

Structure Type SPACE FRAME

Number of Nodes 11 Highest Node 13

Number of Basic Load Cases 4

Included in this printout are data for:

Included in this printout are results for load cases:

Client File POLE.STD Date/Time 09-Jun-2023 14:21

Client File POLE.STD Date/Time 09-Jun-2023 14:21

Reference Load Cases

Primary Load Cases

Combination Load Cases