Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6.3 Ecosystems MS
6.3 Ecosystems MS
6.3 Ecosystems MS
com
Questio
Answer/Indicative content Marks Guidance
n
1 C 1
Total 1
2 B 1
Total 1
3 C✓ 1
Total 1
4 C✓ 1
Total 1
ALLOW B
Examiner’s Comments
5 A 1 Almost two-thirds of
candidates were correct
about pioneer communities.
Total 1
Examiner’s Comments
Total 1
7 B✓ 1 (AO 2.1)
Total 0
1
8 A✓
AO2.1
Total 1
Ecosystems PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
1
9 C✓
AO1.2
Total 1
1 1
D✓
0 AO1.2
Total 1
predation / herbivory ✓
b competition ✓ Max 1
Total 6
created dams
flooded areas upstream / reduced flow rate
downstream creating still / slow moving water for
aquatic species✓
ii Max 3 ALLOW any other valid point
felled trees
opened up tree canopy allowing light to ground level✓
built lodges
Ecosystems PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
c max 4
trees cut down✓
Total 12
Total 7
Ecosystems PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
Total 4
Examiner’s Comments
A small proportion of
1
i 8550 (kJ m−2 yr−1) ✓✓ 2 candidates were awarded full
5
marks for this question.
Many gained one mark for
an answer of 7600, for
incorrectly multiplying 950
000 by 8, instead of 9, and
then correctly converting it to
kJ. The remainder were
awarded no marks due to an
incorrect calculation or giving
an answer of 7,600,000 and
not converting it to kJ.
Examiner’s Comments
The majority of candidates
were awarded one mark
here for either a fully correct
answer or ECF from Q4(c)(i).
Where not awarded, this was
Ecosystems PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
Total 3
DO NOT ALLOW mp 2 if
value of D not calculated
Examiner’s Comments
Examiner’s Comments
or Examiner’s Comments
systematic sampling / place quadrats at, set / pre-
ii 3
determined, intervals along the transect Successful responses
or referred to the use of a belt
random sampling using quadrats in, selected areas / or line transect to sample
strata ✓ stages of succession and a
few referred to the use of
stratified sampling.
pooter / sweep nets / pitfall traps / light traps / tree- Candidates were less
beating ✓ successful in describing how
to minimise sampling bias,
the most common error was
to refer to random sampling
without stating in what
context this would be used.
Contradictory statements
referring to the use of
random sampling along a
transect, lost many
candidates marks.
Examiner’s Comments
Total 7
IGNORE descriptions of
the scientists need to know whether… improvements to method e.g.
same growing conditions /
effects of other herbivores /
tomato plants produce methyl jasmonate ✓ constant number of larvae
herbivores died
Examiner’s Comments
Successful candidates
avoided describing
improvements in the method,
since this is not required by
the question. Many
recognised the need to know
if methyl jasmonate was
produced naturally by plants
and if the concentrations
used in the investigation
were close to those
produced by plants. A
smaller number of
candidates recognised the
need to understand if methyl
jasmonate increased
biomass as a result of
increasing the plant's growth
rate rather than reducing
herbivory. Candidates who
stated that scientists need to
know whether other
herbivores respond in same
way, rather than specifying
other insects, did not gain
credit.
ALLOW description of
relationship e.g. 'as more
methyl jasmonate applied
mass of tomato plant
increases'
'there is a positive correlation
between methyl jasmonate
and final mass'
methyl jasmonate increases the (final) mass (of tomato Examiner’s Comments
ii 1(AO3.2)
plants) ✓
This was answered well by
most candidates, who used
the terms from Fig. 5.1 in
their answers. A few
candidates wanted to
expand their answer to
include reasons, which often
lost them the mark since
they were concluding
Ecosystems PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
ALLOW description of
relationship e.g. 'as more
methyl jasmonate larvae eat
each other more' / 'there is a
positive correlation between
methyl jasmonate and
cannibalism'
Examiner’s Comments
Total 4
If answer incorrect...
ALLOW max 1 mark for
8.8492 × 109 / 8.84 × 109 /
correct answer not in
standard form
Examiner’s Comments
Total 6
ALLOW ammonia,
c i urea / uric acid 1
ammonium (ions).
Nitrosomonas (1)
nitrite (1)
ii 4
Nitrobacter (1)
nitrate (1)
Total 8
Ecosystems PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
IGNORE references to
oxygen in the reactant and
product columns.
Examiner’s Comments
A low percentage of
candidates (<10%) achieved
four marks on this question
and many had zero or only
one mark awarded. Common
mistakes included:
• Column 1 – not
2
a 4 being specific in
0
saying that the
location for
Rhizobium is in the
root nodules or
leguminous roots.
• Columns 2 and 3 –
missing the charge
on NO2– or
incorrectly
expressing it as a
positive ion NO2+
OR putting
ammonia as a
positive ion NH3+.
• Column 4 – mixing
up oxidation and
reduction.
A surprising number of
candidates also left blank
spaces on this question,
suggesting a lack of
understanding of the
nitrogen cycle.
Ecosystems PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
DO NOT ACCEPT
coenzyme
IGNORE removes H2 so
more N2 can bind (to active
site)
Examiner’s Comments
Few candidates obtained full
marks on this question.
Those that did talked about
the removal of oxygen and
CO and therefore removal of
inhibition of the enzyme.
Some common
errors/omissions on this
question included:
• Candidates
mentioned the
removal/ binding of
CO/oxygen by
leghaemoglobin but
did not then
mention how this
affects the enzyme.
• Candidates talked
about how
leghaemoglobin
provides the Iron
(from the haem
group) for the
enzyme’s prosthetic
group or
protons/electrons
for the reaction.
Total 10
Total 9
OR
AO2.5
Heather moorland is
deflected succession
because…
• climax community is
prevented from
developing
As a result…
• plagioclimax
• heather is a shrub
Total 6
IGNORE refs to
conspicuousness of tags
Examiner’s Comments
Just under half of candidates
gained one mark for (a)(i) for
dangerous (for collector or jaguar)
alluding to the dangerous
nature of capturing jaguars
but very few gained a
second mark. Many
candidates did not notice the
reference to the capture-
recapture technique and
answered in terms of the
inappropriateness of camera
traps, which did not gain
credit.
Ecosystems PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
1 CREDIT e.g.
3 Must be in context of mp 1
or 2
human sightings
idea of any one of the following
misidentification
seeing the same individual twice exaggeration / lying
IGNORE hard to spot
poor recollection
jaguars likely to be in, places / times, humans are not
method unlikely to spot cubs (as still in den)
ii
footprints 2
i
idea of any one of the following
IGNORE misidentification if
misidentification
given in human sighting
might disappear (before recording)
multiple prints in same spot makes counting difficult
Examiner’s Comments
same print might be counted on different occasions
This was generally well
many prints made by the same individual hard to
answered. Candidates who
distinguish individual jaguars
thought that jaguars lived
footprints not always left
alongside tigers or cheetahs
were not penalised for
incorrect general knowledge.
Total 8
Total 4