https://docs.google.

com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSexAnNREgifLE3SuDm3jMM
z7cz56ehxAufIoHqGUUbGIE0Q5Q/viewform?usp=sharing

The purpose of my Google Form:

"To assess the influence and impact of BTS's music, specifically the song
'Magic Shop,' on students' mental health, emotional well-being, and their general
perspective on music as a coping tool. This survey aims to gather insights on how
students resonate with different aspects of the song and to understand the potential
role of music-centered initiatives in promoting mental health within the school
setting."

This purpose is centered around understanding the deeper connection students

might have with music, especially from influential groups like BTS, and how this
connection might be harnessed for positive mental health outcomes in an educational
environment.
Evaluation Rubric for Hybe Corp Website https://hybecorp.com/eng/main#

To create the evaluation rubric for the website, I started by identifying key
components that are crucial to a website's usability and design, drawing from
standard web design principles. These components included Content, Layout,
Navigation, Graphics, Color, Font, Links, and Mobility.

I selected the Hybe Corp website based on your provided link. The aim was to assess
the website's design and functionality against the aforementioned criteria.

Upon evaluation, the Hybe Corp website scored well in most categories:

Content (4/5): The content appeared clear and insightful, detailing the company's
offerings. However, some sections could perhaps benefit from more detailed
descriptions.

Layout (5/5): The website exhibited a professional and clean layout, greatly
enhancing the user experience.

Navigation (4/5): Navigation was mostly intuitive, though there might be minor
areas that could be made more streamlined.

Graphics (4/5): Good graphics were used, but some might not align perfectly with
the corresponding content.

Color (4/5): The color scheme was consistent and pleasant, albeit with slight areas
of potential inconsistency.

Font (4/5): Font choices were legible and generally consistent.

Links (4/5): Most links appeared functional, though there may be some minor
discrepancies.

Mobility (4/5): The website's design was mobile-responsive, likely working well on
most devices but possibly exhibiting minor display issues on certain screen sizes.

It's important to note that this evaluation was hypothetical and based on standard
web design principles, given that I don't have the capability to access and view
websites in real-time. For a more accurate assessment, a manual review of the
website would be necessary.