Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

AATCC Test Method 100-2004

Antibacterial Finishes on Textile Materials: Assessment of


Developed in 1961 by AATCC Committee details such as material safety data sheets can Type Culture Collection No. 4352.
RA31; revised 1965, 1981, 1988 (with ti- and other manufacturer’s recommenda- Gram negative organism (see 13.10).
tle change), 1993, 1999; editorially re- tions. All OSHA standards and rules 6.1.3 Other suitable species can also be
vised 1969, 1971, 1974, 1985; must also be consulted and followed. used.
reaffirmed 1977, 1981, 1989, 1998; edi- 4.1 Both the qualitative and quantita-
torially revised and reaffirmed 1986, tive tests should be carried out by persons 7. Culture Medium
2004. with training and experience in the use of
7.1 Suitable broth/agar media are Nu-
bacteriological techniques. The U.S. De-
trient, Trypticase Soy and Brain-Heart
partment of Health and Human Services
1. Purpose and Scope Infusion.
publication, Biosafety in Microbiological
Nutrient Broth:
1.1 This test method provides a quanti- and Biomedical Laboratories, should be
Peptone (Bacto-peptone)
tative procedure for the evaluation of the consulted (see 13.1).
(see 13.3) 5g
degree of antibacterial activity. Assess- 4.2 CAUTION: Some of the bacteria Beef extract (see 13.4) 3g
ment of antibacterial finishes on textile used in this test are capable of infecting
Distilled water to 1000 mL
materials is determined by the degree of humans and producing disease. There-
7.2 Heat to a boil to disperse ingre-
antibacterial activity intended in the use fore, every necessary and reasonable pre-
dients. Adjust to pH 6.8 ± 0.1 with 1N
of such materials. If only bacteriostatic caution must be taken to eliminate this
sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution. (This
activity (inhibition of multiplication) is risk to the laboratory personnel and to
is not necessary if prepared, dehydrated
intended, a qualitative procedure which personnel in the associated environment.
medium is used.)
clearly demonstrates antibacterial activity Wear protective clothing and respiratory
7.3 Dispense in 10 mL amounts in con-
as contrasted with lack of such activity by protection that prevents penetration by
ventional bacteriological culture tubes
an untreated specimen may be accept- the bacteria.
(i.e., 125 × 17 mm). Plug and sterilize at
able. However, if bactericidal activity is 4.3 Good laboratory practices should 103 kPa (15 psi) for 15 min.
intended or implied, quantitative evalua- be followed. Wear safety glasses in all 7.4 Nutrient agar. Add 1.5% bacterio-
tion is necessary. Quantitative evaluation laboratory areas. logical agar to nutrient (or appropriate)
also provides a clearer picture for possi- 4.4 All chemicals should be handled broth (see 7.1). Heat to boiling. Check
ble uses of such treated textile materials. with care. pH and adjust to 7.1 ± 0.1 using NaOH
4.5 An eyewash/safety shower should solution if necessary. Dispense in 15 ± 1
2. Principle be located nearby for emergency use. mL amounts in conventional bacteriolog-
2.1 Swatches of test and control textile 4.6 Sterilize all contaminated samples ical culture tubes. Plug and sterilize at
and test materials prior to disposal. 103 kPa (15 psi) for 15 min. (May be
materials are tested qualitatively for anti-
bacterial activity by AATCC Method 147. 4.7 Exposure to chemicals used in this sterilized in 1000 mL borosilicate glass
Those showing activity are evaluated procedure must be controlled at or below flasks and petri dishes poured from this.)
quantitatively. Test and control swatches levels set by government authorities (e.g., 7.5 Slurry Inoculum Carrier (for hy-
are inoculated with the test organisms. Occupational Safety and Health Adminis- drophobic fabrics) (see 7.2 and 7.3):
After incubation, the bacteria are eluted tration’s [OSHA] permissible exposure Sodium Chloride 8.5 g
from the swatches by shaking in known limits [PEL] as found in 29 CFR Agar 3.0 g
amounts of neutralizing solution. The 1910.1000 of January 1, 1989). In addition, Distilled Water 1000 mL
number of bacteria present in this liquid is the American Conference of Governmen-
determined, and the percentage reduction tal Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Thresh- 8. Maintenance of Culture of Test
by the treated specimen is calculated. old Limit Values (TLVs) comprised of time Organisms
weighted averages (TLV-TWA), short term
exposure limits (TLV-STEL) and ceiling 8.1 Using a 4 mm inoculating loop,
3. Terminology
limits (TLV-C) are recommended as a gen- transfer the culture daily in nutrient (or
3.1 activity, n.—of an antibacterial eral guide for air contaminant exposure appropriate medium) broth for not more
agent, a measure of effectiveness of the which should be met (see 13.2). than two weeks. At the conclusion of two
agent. weeks, make a fresh transplant from stock
3.2 antibacterial agent, n.—in tex- 5. Limitations culture. Incubate cultures at 37 ± 2°C (99
tiles, any chemical which kills bacteria ± 3°F) or other optimal temperature.
(bactericide) or interferes with the multi- 5.1 For a qualitative, relatively quick 8.2 Maintain stock cultures on nutrient
plication, growth or activity of bacteria and easily executed method to determine or appropriate agar slants. Store at 5 ±
(bacteriostat). residual antibacterial activity of textile 1°C (41 ± 2°F) and transfer once a month
materials, refer to AATCC Method 147, to fresh agar (see 13.5).
4. Safety Precautions Antibacterial Activity Assessment of
Textile Materials: Parallel Streak Method. 9. Qualitative Test (Screening or
NOTE: These safety precautions are Presumptive Test)
for information purposes only. The pre- 6. Test Organisms
cautions are ancillary to the testing proce- 9.1 For detection of bacteriostatic ac-
dures and are not intended to be all inclu- 6.1 Test bacteria. tivity use AATCC Method 147 on a test
sive. It is the user’s responsibility to use 6.1.1 Staphylococcus aureus, American specimen and control specimen using the
safe and proper techniques in handling Type Culture Collection No. 6538. Gram organisms referred to above. For demon-
materials in this test method. Manufac- positive organism (see13.10). stration of bactericidal activity, proceed
turers MUST be consulted for specific 6.1.2 Klebsiella pneumoniae, Ameri- to the quantitative test described below.

AATCC Technical Manual /2007 TM 100-2004 145


Copyright © 2006 American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists
10. Quantitative Test (Reference or of neutralizing solution to each of the jars 2) 100 (C – A)/C = R
Confirmatory Test) containing the inoculated untreated con-
trol swatches, the inoculated treated test where:
10.1 Preparation. The following de- swatches and the uninoculated treated C = the number of bacteria recovered
scription will be in terms of fabric test swatches. from the inoculated untreated
swatches. Textile materials not in fabric control specimen swatches in the
10.2.3 The neutralizing solution should
form can likewise be tested with the ap- jar immediately after inoculation
include ingredients to neutralize the spe-
propriate modification. (at “0” contact time)
cific antibacterial fabric treatment and to
10.1.1 Size and shape of treated take care of any pH requirements of the If “B and C” are not similar, the larger
swatches: Cut circular swatches 4.8 ± fabrics (from finishes, antibacterial number should be used. If “B” and “C”
0.1 cm (1.9 ± 0.03 in.) in diameter, from agents, etc.). The neutralizing solution are not significantly different, (B + C)/2
the test fabric (preferably with a steel employed should be reported (see 13.8). should be used as follows:
die). Stack the swatches in a 250 mL
wide-mouth glass jar with screw cap. 10.2.4 Shake the jars vigorously for 3) 100(D – A/D) = R
The number of swatches to be used is one minute. Make serial dilutions with
water and plate (in duplicate) on nutrient where:
dependent on the fiber type and fabric D = (B + C)/2
construction. Use that amount of fabric (or appropriate) agar. Dilutions of 100,
which will absorb the 1.0 ± 0.1 mL of 101, 102 are usually suitable. 11.3 If an untreated control is not avail-
inoculum, and leave no free liquid in the 10.2.5 Incubation over contact periods. able, use the following calculation which
jar. For example, 4 swatches of cotton Incubate additional jars containing inocu- allows for any background organisms
print cloth will absorb 1 mL. The num- lated untreated control swatches and that might interfere with the test.
ber of swatches used per jar should be jars containing inoculated treated test
reported. swatches at 37 ± 2°C (99 ± 3°F) for 18- Bg = 100 [(B – E) – (A – F)/B – E]
10.1.2 Controls. Swatches of the same 24 h. Similar jars may be incubated over
other periods (e.g., 1 or 6 h) to provide where:
fiber type and fabric construction as test A, B = (see 11.2)
sample but containing no antibacterial information about the bactericidal activ-
ity of the treatment over such periods. E = the number of bacteria initially
finish (negative control). recovered from the uninocu-
10.1.3 Sterilization of samples. This is 10.2.6 Sampling of inoculated and
lated treated test sample (exist-
optional. The method to be used depends incubated swatches. After incubation,
ing background organisms)
on the type of fiber and finish. Cotton, ac- add 100 ± 1 mL of neutralizing solution
to jars containing untreated control F = The number of bacteria recov-
etate and many manmade fibers can be ered from the uninoculated,
sterilized in the autoclave. Wool can be swatches and to jars containing treated
pre-wet treated test sample after
sterilized by ethylene oxide or by inter- test swatches. Shake the jars vigorously
for one minute. Make serial dilutions and incubation in the jar over the
mittent (fractional) sterilization in flow- desired contact period (existing
ing steam. The latter is also least damag- plate (in duplicate) on nutrient (or appro-
background organisms after
ing to certain finishes. Report method of priate) agar. Dilutions of 100, 101, 102 are
usually suitable for treated test fabrics. contact period)
sterilization, if used. Bg = background organisms
10.1.4 Size of inoculum per sample. Several different dilutions may be re-
Apply 1.0 ± 0.1 mL of an appropriate di- quired for untreated control fabrics de- 11.4 For a valid test there should be:
lution of a 24 h broth culture of the test pending on the incubation period. (1) “0” colonies of test organism recov-
organism so that recovery from (1) un- 10.2.7 Incubate all plates for 48 h ered from the uninoculated treated test
treated control fabric swatches or (2) at 37 ± 2°C (99 ± 3°F) or other optimal specimen swatches and (2) a significant
treated test fabric swatches at “0” contact temperature. increase in the numbers of bacteria recov-
time (plated as soon as possible after in- ered from the inoculated untreated con-
oculation) will show counts of 1-2 × 105 trol specimen swatches incubated for the
organisms. The dilution of the test organ- 11. Evaluation specified contact time over the numbers
ism should be made in nutrient (or appro- of bacteria recovered from the inoculated
11.1 Report bacterial counts as the untreated specimen swatches at “0” con-
priate) broth (see 7.1, 7.5 and 13.6). number of bacteria per sample (swatches
10.2 Procedure. tact time (immediately after inoculation).
in jar) not as the number of bacteria per This applies only if dilution was made in
10.2.1 Inoculation of fabrics. When mL of neutralizing solution. Report “0”
using Staphylococcus aureus, shake a 24 broth (see 10.1.4 and 13.6).
counts at 100 dilution as “less than 100.”
h culture and let stand for 15-20 min be- 11.5 Report percent reduction of bac-
11.2 Calculate percent reduction of teria by the specimen treatment against
fore preparing the inoculum.* Place the
bacteria by the specimen treatments by each test organism.
swatches separately in sterile petri dishes
one of the following formulas: 11.6 The criterion for passing the test
and use a microliter pipette to inoculate
them making sure that there is even dis- must be determined by the interested
1) 100 (B – A)/B = R parties.
tribution of the inoculum (see 13.7).
Transfer these swatches aseptically to the 11.7 Report the dilution medium used.
where:
jar. Screw the jar tops on tightly to pre-
vent evaporation. R = % reduction 12. Precision and Bias
10.2.2 As soon as possible after inocu- A = the number of bacteria recovered
from the inoculated treated test 12.1 Studies (see 13.9) indicate the fol-
lation (“0” contact time), add 100 ± 1 mL lowing within-laboratory precision of the
specimen swatches in the jar in-
cubated over the desired contact Standard Plate Count (SPC) Test: (a)
period among-analyst variation of 18% and (b)
B = the number of bacteria recovered within-analyst variation of 8%.
from the inoculated treated test
13. Notes and References
*Using a 1 mL pipette, pad the inoculum carefully onto specimen swatches in the jar im-
the fabric. If a strain of Pseudomonas that forms a pelli-
cle is used, avoid including fragments of the pellicle in mediately after inoculation (at 13.1 Publication available from U.S. De-
the inoculum. “0” contact time) partment of Health and Human Services CDC/

146 TM 100-2004 AATCC Technical Manual/2007


Copyright © 2006 American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists
NIH-HHS Publication No. (CDC) 84-8395. nonmutant test culture. Avoid contamination to cause a reduction in bacterial numbers, by
13.2 Booklet available from Publications by use of good sterile technique in plating and prior testing at the intended use concentration.
Office, ACGIH, Kemper Woods Center, 1330 transferring. Avoid mutation by strict adher- Report the use and concentration of surfactant
Kemper Meadow Dr., Cincinnati OH 45240; ence to monthly stock transfers. Check culture used.
tel: 513/742-2020. purity by making streak plates periodically 13.8 If sterile distilled water is used in the
13.3 Bacto-Peptone may be obtained from and observing for single species-characteristic place of a neutralizing solution, there will al-
Difco Laboratories, 920 Henry St., Detroit MI type of colonies. ways be the possibility that some of the bio-
48201. 13.6 The dilution of the test organism may cide will be carried over.
13.4 Beef extract may be obtained from be prepared in sterile 0.85% saline solution or 13.9 Peeler, J. T.; Leslie, J. W.; Messer,
Baltimore Biological Laboratories, 250 Schill- suitable buffer if a steady-state culture is de- J. W. Replicate counting errors by analysts
ing Cir., Cockeysville MD 21030; Difco sired during the contact period with a fabric or and bacterial colony counters. J. Food Protec-
Laboratories (address above); or Oxoid (USA) in the slurry inoculum carrier when hydropho- tion, Vol. 45, 1982, pp 238-240.
Ltd., 9017 Red Branch Rd., Columbia MD bic fabrics are being tested. 13.10 Available from American Type Cul-
21045. 13.7 A surfactant may be added to the dilu- ture Collection (ATCC), P.O. Box 1549, Ma-
13.5 Consistent and accurate testing re- tion medium to enhance wetting of hydropho- nassas VA 20108; tel: 703/365-2700; fax: 703/
quires maintenance of a pure, uncontaminated, bic fabrics. The surfactant must be shown not 365-2701.

AATCC Technical Manual/2007 TM 100-2004 147


Copyright © 2006 American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists

You might also like