Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tort Law
Tort Law
Tort Law
Name
Institution
TORT LAW 2
Tort Law
From a product defects view, the public policy grounds upon which states may impose
strict liability is precaution over inherently dangerous situations. Many states today enact strict
tort liability for defective goods. In such instances, the state does not require plaintiffs to
demonstrate that the maker did not observe due care during the process or entailed recklessness.
Such a plaintiff can recuperate damages even if the maker utilized all proper care during
manufacturing. States observe such strict liability over defective products because it discourages
recklessness and unnecessary loss by compelling possible defendants to adopt every possible
measure. Observing the liability also has the beneficial impact of streamlining and hence
accelerating court rulings during such proceedings even though its application might appear
The legal rationale for these states is that strict liability ought to apply to the
manufacturer more than any other stakeholder in the production process. Plaintiffs taking legal
action on the grounds of strict liability will have to show the defect on the product, how it caused
harm, and how it made the commodity excessively unsafe. For this reason, buyers are not the
only ones who can apply strict liability in court. Third parties or guests without a straightforward
affiliation with the supposedly defective product can also take legal action for strict liability
when harmed by it. Reasons strict liability should apply to buyers only and not third parties are
the statute of limitations and statute of repose. The statute of limitations will require the third-
party to take legal action timely between when the plaintiff discovered the injuries, which may
prove difficult when the party did not have any direct interaction with the defective product.
Also, the statute of repose would require the plaintiff to bring forth their legal action within a
References