Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EV10003-Water Pollution-II-aut2023
EV10003-Water Pollution-II-aut2023
Water Pollution - 2
Sudha Goel
Dept. of Civil Eng., IITKgp
Kharagpur 721 302
1
Contents
6.00
and non-point
Concentration, mg/L
4.00
discharges of
3.00
wastewater
along the river 2.00
1.00
0.00 4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Masters and Ela, 2012 Distance, km
Table 1 : Use based classification of surface waters in India
Class of
Designated-Best-Use water Criteria
Drinking Water Source without A 1. Total Coliforms Organism MPN/100ml shall be 50 or less
conventional treatment but after
disinfection 2. pH between 6.5 and 8.5
3. Dissolved Oxygen 6mg/l or more
4. Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5 days 20°C 2mg/l or less
Outdoor bathing (Organised) B 1. Total Coliforms Organism MPN/100ml shall be 500 or less
6
7
Flow rate of the river downstream of the discharges, Qf=Qi+Q1+Q2= 1060 m3/s
BOD of the river downstream of the discharges, BODf=[∑BODj.Qj]/Qf = 21.70 mg/L
DO of the river downstream of the discharges, DOf=[∑DOj.Qj]/Qf = 4.72 mg/L
8
Dissolved oxygen sag curve
Oxygen inputs (gains) into water – oxygenation or aeration or reaeration: from the
atmosphere and photosynthesis (aquatic plants and algae)
Oxygen outputs (losses) from water - deoxygenation: bacterial degradation of
organic matter, respiration by phytoplankton
9
Goel (2019) Water and Wastewater Engineering, Cambridge University Press, Delhi.
Dissolved oxygen sag curve
D = DO Deficit in water
D = DOs - DO
10
Goel (2019) Water and Wastewater Engineering, Cambridge University Press, Delhi.
Dissolved oxygen sag curve
11
Goel (2019) Water and Wastewater Engineering, Cambridge University Press, Delhi.
12
Masters and Ela, 2012
Self-purification capacity of a river
13
Masters and Ela, 2012
Rate constants
Theta (kd) = 1.047
Theta (kr) = 1.024
17
Effluent discharge standard for BOD3 to an inland river is 30 mg/L. Determine the
ultimate CBOD (L0) that can be discharged assuming kd = 0.4 1/d and kr = 0.3 1/d. Using
this Lo value, DO saturation = 8 mg/L and an initial DO deficit of 2 mg/L, calculate the
minimum DO and the distance at which it occurs. Assume river velocity = 10 km/h. Plot
the DO sag curve for these conditions and determine the time or distance taken for the
river to recover completely. What stretch of the river will be completely anaerobic?
10
DO conc., mg/L
5
DO conc., mg/L
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
-5
-10
-15
time, days
Solution
Time to reach minimum DO, tc = 2.76 days
Distance to reach minimum DO, xc = 662.7 km
Stretch of the river that is completely anaerobic = 100.8 to 2028 km
18
Eutrophication
19
Eutrophication
20
Water quality impacts associated with
eutrophication
• Noxious algal growth: leads to increase in scum, exudates that may be
toxic, color, taste and odor, turbidity, and NOM levels
• NOM leads to disinfection by-product formation during disinfection
with halogenated compounds like chlorine
• Creates an anaerobic zone below the algal layer
Bacterial growth and organic decomposition:
low pH and DO levels
loss of habitat for fish and fish food
• Excessive macrophyte (weeds) growth: loss of open water
• Excessive organic matter production due to algal and bacterial growth
(smothers eggs and bugs)
• Cyanobacteria are inedible by some zooplankton (reduced food chain
efficiency)
• Toxic effects of algal blooms
• "Toxic" gases (ammonia, H2S) in bottom water (more loss of fish
habitat) 21
Water use and reuse
Well or
surface Water treatment Distribution
water plant network
intake
Recycle
Reuse for Wastewater Sewer system
Consumer
irrigation treatment plant
Discharge to
land, surface
water or sea
22
Conventional drinking water treatment
Coliforms: 0/100 mL
Fecal coliforms: 0/100 mL desirable
Virus: min 0.5 mg/L free chlorine residual for 1 h is expected to
inactivate all viruses even in polluted waters
Residual free chlorine at a minimum of 0.2 mg/L or 1 mg/L when no
alternative source is available
Other biological contaminants are regulated
Giardia and Cryptosporidium should be absent when 10 L of water
are tested
24
25
Conventional drinking water treatment
27
Water intake or infiltration well
TURBID
Settling tank: floc removal
SURFACE
WATER
Filtration: Turbidity, TSS, floc removal
Softening
Removal of calcium and magnesium hardness
Filtration
Turbidity, TSS, colloid removal, chlorine to prevent biological growth on filter
media
Backwash water
30
Conventional municipal wastewater treatment
Sewage
Screening Biogas
32
Pune Wastewater Treatment
Plant, 2014
33
Surface aeration (wastewater)
34
http://www.wastewater-treatment-plants.com/surface-aerators.html
Floating aerators (wastewater)
35
http://www.wastewater-treatment-plants.com/surface-aerators.html
Conventional municipal wastewater treatment:
Anaerobic digestion
36
Wastewater parameters of importance and their
average values in untreated domestic wastewater
37
National Green Tribunal
•All places with a municipality, corporation, cantonment board or notified town area
committee, etc. known as Statutory Town. All other places which satisfied the following criteria
known as Census Town: A minimum population of 5,000; At least 75 per cent of the male
main workers engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; A density of population of at least 400 per
sq. Km. The number of metropolitan cities having
41
million plus population has increased from
35 to 53 as per 2011 census.
• https://mohua.gov.in/cms/number-of-cities--towns-by-city-size-class.php
Classification of cities in India
42
Water Quality Index
Water quality indices (WQI) provide a uniform scale for comparison of water
quality in any part of the world with a single value since it is difficult to compare
several water quality parameters for different water sources at the same time.
WQI can be used to compare water quality spatially as well as temporally.
Several water quality indices are available in the literature.
Earliest one is by Horton (1965) followed by the USA-National Sanitation
Foundation (NSF) in 1970.
The NSF-WQI was based on the Delphi approach where a panel of 142 experts
from all over the United States with expertise in various aspects of water quality
management provided a list of the most important water quality parameters and
their relationship with water quality (Canter 1999).
Charts correlating the value of each water quality parameter with a quality index
were generated by averaging the responses of experts and are available in the
same text or on various websites. 43
44
Goel, 2019
45
Goel, 2019
Goel, 2019 46
END
Of
Part 2
47