Executive Summary: Assessing Readiness for Innovation at Dangote Cement

Nexford University

BUS 6120: Introduction to Intrapreneurship and Innovation

Dr. Geoffrey Vanderpal

November 17, 2023

 Introduction

After thoroughly analyzing Dangote Cement's current operations, a promising opportunity for

innovation lies in adopting advanced data analytics and artificial intelligence in their

production processes. Implementing smart technologies can optimize resource utilization,

enhance production efficiency, and contribute to sustainable practices in the cement

manufacturing industry.

Ready, Set, Change! Decision Support Tool - TCU-ORC

The Ready, Set, Change! Decision Support Tool recommended the TCU-ORC (Technology

Change Unveiling - Organizational Readiness Checklist) as the most suitable readiness

assessment measure for Dangote Cement.

The TCU-ORC is a comprehensive assessment tool designed to evaluate organizations'

preparedness for technology-driven changes (Gagnon et al., 2014). It encompasses various

dimensions, including organizational culture, leadership alignment, technological

infrastructure, and employee skills. The tool has been widely used in diverse industries and

has effectively predicted successful technology adoption.

Key Findings

Appropriateness of TCU-ORC: The TCU-ORC is well-aligned with the innovation

opportunity of incorporating advanced technologies at Dangote Cement. It offers a nuanced

understanding of the organizational landscape, covering crucial aspects that impact the

success of technological integration.

Comprehensive Insight: TCU-ORC provides a holistic view, assessing technological

capabilities, organizational culture, and leadership support (Lehman et al., 2012). This
breadth is essential for successfully transitioning to a technologically advanced production

environment.

Benefits and Drawbacks

Benefits

In-Depth Analysis: TCU-ORC goes beyond surface-level assessments (Taylor-Ritzler et al.,

2013), diving deep into cultural and leadership factors that significantly influence the success

of technological innovations.

Benchmarking Capability: The tool allows for benchmarking against industry best

practices, providing insights into where Dangote Cement stands compared to peers.

Drawbacks

Resource Intensive: Implementing TCU-ORC requires significant resources in terms of time

and personnel. This may pose challenges in a fast-paced industry like cement manufacturing.

Subjectivity: Some aspects of the assessment, particularly those related to cultural readiness,

might be subjective and open to interpretation.

Final Recommendation

Considering the strategic importance of the innovation opportunity and the need for a

thorough understanding of Dangote Cement's readiness, TCU-ORC is highly recommended.

Despite some drawbacks, its comprehensive nature and proven effectiveness in similar

contexts make it a valuable tool for guiding the organization through the upcoming

technological transformation.
In conclusion, adopting TCU-ORC will provide Dangote Cement with a solid foundation for

successful innovation implementation, ensuring that the organization is well-prepared for the

challenges and opportunities of integrating advanced technologies into its operations.

References

Gagnon, M. P., Attieh, R., Ghandour, E. K., Légaré, F., Ouimet, M., Estabrooks, C. A., &

Grimshaw, J. (2014, December 4). A Systematic Review of Instruments to Assess

Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation in Health Care. PLoS ONE, 9(12),

e114338. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114338

Lehman, W. E. K., Greener, J. M., Rowan-Szal, G. A., & Flynn, P. M. (2012, February 29).

Organizational Readiness for Change in Correctional and Community Substance Abuse

Programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51(1–2), pp. 96–114.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2012.633022

Taylor-Ritzler, T., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Garcia-Iriarte, E., Henry, D. B., & Balcazar, F. E.

(2013, May 6). Understanding and Measuring Evaluation Capacity. American Journal of

Evaluation, 34(2), pp. 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214012471421