Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022].

See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, VOL. 16, NO. 4, 1072, doi:10.1029/2001GB001766, 2002

Global biogeochemical cycle of boron


Haewon Park1 and William H. Schlesinger
Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham,
North Carolina, USA

Received 30 September 2001; revised 16 May 2002; accepted 4 June 2002; published 5 November 2002.

[1] The global Boron (B) cycle is primarily driven by a large flux (1.44 Tg B/yr) through
the atmosphere derived from seasalt aerosols. Other significant sources of atmospheric
boron include emissions during the combustion of biomass (0.26–0.43 Tg B/yr) and coal,
which adds 0.20 Tg B/yr as an anthropogenic contribution. These known inputs to the
atmosphere cannot account for the boron removed from the atmosphere during rainfall
(3.0 Tg B/yr) and estimated dry deposition (1.3–2.7 Tg B/yr). In addition to atmospheric
deposition, rock weathering is a source of boron (0.19 Tg B/yr) for terrestrial ecosystems,
and humans mine about 0.31 Tg B/yr from the Earth’s crust. More than 4.8 Tg B/yr
circulates in the biogeochemical cycle of land plants, and about 0.53–0.63 Tg B/yr is
carried from land to sea by rivers. The biogeochemical cycle of boron in the sea includes
4.4 Tg B/yr circulating in the marine biosphere, and an annual loss of 0.47 Tg B/yr to the
oceanic crust via a variety of sedimentary processes that collectively remove only a small
fraction of the total annual inputs to the oceans. Thus with our current understanding of
the global biogeochemistry of B, the atmospheric budget shows outputs > inputs, while
the marine compartments show inputs > outputs. Despite these uncertainties, it is clear
that the human perturbation of the global B cycle has more than doubled the mobilization
of B from the crust and contributes significantly to the B transport in rivers. INDEX
TERMS: 0305 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Aerosols and particles (0345, 4801); 0330
Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Geochemical cycles; 1610 Global Change: Atmosphere (0315,
0325); 1615 Global Change: Biogeochemical processes (4805); 4825 Oceanography: Biological and
Chemical: Geochemistry; KEYWORDS: atmospheric deposition, biogeochemistry, biomass burning, boron,
geochemical cycles, human impacts, hydrothermal activity
Citation: Park, H., and W. H. Schlesinger, Global biogeochemical cycle of boron, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 16(4), 1072,
doi:10.1029/2001GB001766, 2002.

1. Introduction 1987; Goldberg, 1997; Xu et al., 2001]. In seawater, equili-


brium reactions of B contribute to alkalinity and to the
[2] Boron (B) is an essential element for life and poten-
buffering of pH [Holmén, 2000]. Recent interest in the B
tially limiting to the growth of marine and freshwater
content of seawater stems from the observation that the
phytoplankton [Subba Rao, 1981] and to the growth of
isotopes of B (10B versus 11B) are fractionated during co-
land plants in certain habitats [Stone, 1990; Bernier and
precipitation in carbonates [Vengosh et al., 1991; Hemming
Brazeau, 1988]. B is essential for plant nitrogen assimila-
and Hanson, 1992]. The fractionation is pH-dependent,
tion [Camacho-Cristobal and Fontes, 1999], for the devel-
potentially allowing a reconstruction of the paleochemistry
opment of root nodules in N-fixing plants [Bolanos et al.,
of seawater and past variations in atmospheric CO2 content
1994], for the formation of polysaccharide linkages in plant
[Spivack et al., 1993; Sanyal et al., 1995; Pearson and
cell walls [O’Neill et al., 2001], and for a variety of other
Palmer, 2000].
processes in higher plants [Shelp, 1993]. It has recently
[3] The global cycle of B comprises terrestrial, marine,
been identified as a signaling mechanism in bacteria [Chen
and atmospheric components: the latter driven by a consid-
et al., 2002]. B is normally found as borate (BO3 3) in soils,
erable flux of gaseous B in the form of boric acid (H3BO3)
where its availability is controlled by interactions with soil
that is derived from seasalt aerosols. Although there have
carbonates and oxides/hydrous oxides of Fe and Al, in
been several attempts to balance a budget for B in the
reactions that are analogous to those for phosphate [Jin et al.,
oceans [You et al., 1993; Smith et al., 1995; Lemarchand et
al., 2000], none considers the exchange of B between
1
seawater and the atmosphere, which is potentially the
Now at Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton,
New Jersey, USA.
largest flux in its global cycle [cf. Fogg and Duce, 1985].
As is the case for many elements, the global cycle of B has
Copyright 2002 by the American Geophysical Union. been altered by human activities that currently extract >4
0886-6236/02/2001GB001766 Tg/yr ( = 1012 g/yr) of boron ores from the Earth’s crust

20 - 1
19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
20 - 2 PARK AND SCHLESINGER: GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF BORON

Figure 1. Model for the global biogeochemical cycle of boron.

[U.S. Geological Survey (USGS ), 2000]. Large amounts of et al., 1994], is nearly always higher than the Henry’s Law
B are used in the manufacture of borosilicate glass, deter- prediction of the concentration in equilibrium with dis-
gents, and fire extinguishing materials, and in the disposal solved B(OH) 3 in seawater (4.6 mg B/kg; Holland
of nuclear waste. [1978]). The higher concentration of B in the atmosphere
[4] Here we provide a compilation and synthesis of data is thought to be derived from the evaporation of boric acid
from the literature, leading to a pictorial model for the vapor from seasalt aerosols as they dry. As a result, B/Na in
global biogeochemical cycle of B (Figure 1). In this seasalt aerosols is normally about 5.6 times less than B/Na
compilation, we describe the uncertainty associated with in seawater [Rose et al., 2000a]. Despite this partitioning
estimates of the major fluxes of boron, while assuming into gaseous and particulate phases, the total input of B to
that errors in the minor fluxes do not alter the global the atmosphere can be calculated from estimates of the
picture. Where we have incorporated the data of previous formation of seasalt aerosols, assuming that there is no
authors, we have retained the number of significant digits fractionation of ions during the injection of bubbles to the
published in their work. This quantitative synthesis of the atmosphere, as suggested by Fogg and Duce [1985; cf.
global B cycle offers context to assess the current human Glass and Matteson, 1973].
impact and to identify areas of uncertainty in our current [6] The annual production of seasalt aerosols is estimated
understanding. at 10  1015 g/yr [Möller, 1990] to 11.7  1015 g/yr [Gong
et al., 1997]. Both estimates are compatible with an earlier
estimate of 8 –22  1015 g/yr for the annual dry deposition
2. Literature Review and Results of seasalt over the world oceans [Erickson and Duce, 1988].
2.1. Atmospheric Flux With an average seawater salinity of 35%, the annual input
2.1.1. Inputs of B to the atmosphere could range from 1.0 to 2.3 Tg B/yr.
2.1.1.1. Seasalt Aerosols A similar calculation, using the Cl budget for the atmos-
[5] The gas-phase concentration of B in the atmosphere, phere [Graedel and Keene, 1995] and a chlorinity ratio of
which is assumed to be boric acid vapor (H3BO3) [Anderson 0.00024 in seawater, yields an estimate of 1.44 Tg B/yr. We
19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
PARK AND SCHLESINGER: GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF BORON 20 - 3

use the median of these values, 1.44 (1.0 – 2.3) Tg B/yr, in [9] The global flux of B from volcanoes to the atmosphere
our budget for B in the atmosphere. is undoubtedly varying from year to year, but our estimate of
2.1.1.2. Volcanoes gaseous emissions, 0.017 – 0.022 Tg B/yr, provides the likely
[7] Citing a single value for the B/SO2 ratio in volcanic range of values for the annual volcanic flux to the atmos-
emanations, Fogg and Duce [1985] calculated the gaseous phere. The B fluxes derived from the gaseous ratios of B/Cl
flux of B from volcanoes as 2.1 Tg B/yr, based on an estimate and B/SO2 seem to agree well and are much lower than
of the annual flux of SO2 from volcanoes worldwide. previous estimations. Given this small flux, we have not
Anderson et al. [1994] gathered additional data that indicated attempted to provide an uncertainty estimate for it.
that the B/SO2 ratio of 0.14 available to Fogg and Duce was [10] Fogg and Duce [1985] estimated the B flux in
unusually high. Anderson et al. used a mean B/SO2 ratio of volcanic particulates as 0.0003 Tg B/yr by taking the
0.02 from Mount St. Helens to calculate global volcanic volcanic particulate emission as 4 – 150 Tg/yr and its B
emissions of 0.24 Tg B/yr, using an estimate of 10 TgS/yr as concentration as 30 ± 9 (standard error, SE) ppm. Anderson
the annual flux of SO2 from volcanoes [Bates et al., 1992]. et al. [1994] estimated the global flux as 0.21 Tg B/yr based
Our compilation of data (Table 1) indicates a median B/SO2 on the concentration of B in volcanic particulates collected
ratio of 0.0011(weight/weight) in volcanic emissions and a from Mount St. Helens. The annual volcanic dust produc-
global flux of 0.022 Tg B/yr from this source. tion is estimated as 35 Tg/yr [Jonas et al., 1995]. Using
[8] A similar approach can be followed using the B/Cl 6.27– 13.4 ppm as the mean values for the B concentration
ratio in volcanic gases and the estimate of 2 Tg/yr of Cl in volcanic ash [Anderson et al., 1994], the global boron
emitted from volcanoes [Graedel and Keene, 1995]. Both B flux via volcanic particulates lies between 0.00022 and
and Cl are partitioned into the gaseous phase in high- 0.00047 Tg B/yr. This new estimate is very small compared
temperature geothermal systems [Arnórsson and Andrés- to the emission of gaseous B from volcanoes, and it can be
dóttir, 1995]. A compilation of B/Cl ratios in volcanic gases ignored in the global budget.
shows a median ratio of 0.0084 (Table 1), and a global 2.1.1.3. Eolian Dust
estimate of B emission of 0.017 Tg/yr from volcanoes. With [11] Tegen and Fung [1995] estimated the annual produc-
the assumption that all gaseous B and Cl emitted by tion of particulates from wind erosion, i.e., global eolian
volcanoes are subsequently captured and deposited in their dust, as 3000 Tg/yr, at the upper limit of a compilation of
ash, Koutz [1971] estimated that volcanoes contribute 0.01 estimates by Duce [1995]. Although some sedimentary
Tg B/yr to the atmosphere: not only about half as large as deposits have higher concentrations, we assume that the B
the estimates presented here, but also much lower than concentration in soil is similar to the mean B concentration
previous values. of the continental crust, 11 ppm [Wedepohl, 1995], so the

Table 1. Ratio of Boron to Cl and SO2 Gases Collected From Various Volcanic Regions
Site Emissions Description Ratio B/Cl (wt/wt)a Ratio B/SO2 (wt/wt) Reference
North America
5
Kilauea, Hawaii plume <6.4  10 Anderson et al. [1994]
4
plume <1.7  10 Anderson et al. [1994]
Mt. St. Helens, Wash. active vent 0.0016 Anderson et al. [1994]
>0.06 Anderson et al. [1994]

Central America
Poas fumaroles <4.3  10 5 Anderson et al. [1994]
Costa Rica 2.6  10 5 Anderson et al. [1994]
El Chichon, Mexico lake fumes 0.19 Anderson et al. [1994]
0.90 Anderson et al. [1994]

Japan
Hokkaido gaseous 0.053 0.038 White and Waring [1963]b

Russia, Kamchaka
Shelveluch Volcano center crater, 1953 0.0003 0.0062 White and Waring [1963]b

New Zealand
Wairakei area steam 0.0126 Hulston and Lupton [1996]
Ohaaki-Broadlands well-bleeding 0.036 Hulston and Lupton [1996]

Iceland
Hekla, Iceland eruption in 1947 0.00126 0.0006 White and Waring [1963]b

Other Region
crator 0.0115 0.0253 Basharina [1965]b
c
Median 0.0084 0.0011
a
wt/wt = weight(g)/weight(g).
b
From Koutz [1971].
c
Arithmetic mean of the total samples.
19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
20 - 4 PARK AND SCHLESINGER: GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF BORON

flux of B to the atmosphere is estimated as 0.033 Tg B/yr. boric acid in the atmosphere. Some boron halogens such as
For the assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on BF3, BCl3, and BBr3 may be produced during biomass
Climate Change, Jonas et al. [1995] indicate a global flux burning, fossil fuel combustion, incineration, and manufac-
of soil aerosols on the order of only 1500 Tg/yr, which turing. Most of these are heavier than the density of air or/
would indicate a B flux of 0.017 Tg/yr to the atmosphere and quickly convert into B(OH)3 in the atmosphere [Braker
from this process. Neither estimate offers a significant flux and Mossman, 1980].
of B to the atmospheric budget. 2.1.2. Outputs
2.1.1.4. Emissions From Vegetation 2.1.2.1. Rain Precipitation (Wetfall)
[12] Nriagu [1979] estimated the total particulate emis- [18] The concentration of B in rainfall has been measured
sion by plants as 75 Tg/yr [Fogg and Duce, 1985]. If the in many places worldwide over the last 30 years. As
mean boron concentration in plant tissues is about 50 ppm, summarized in Table 2, rainwater from continental sites
then each year 0.004 Tg B/yr would be emitted to the contains less B than that from coastal and marine sites.
atmosphere by plant-derived aerosols, which would make Multiplying the mean concentration of B in marine rain (10
only a minor contribution to the atmospheric budget. ± 2.3 (SE) ppb) by an estimate of the annual precipitation
2.1.1.5. Fossil Fuel Burning over the oceans [Chahine, 1992] indicates 3.87 ± 0.89 (SE)
[13] Global coal combustion has increased from 3200 Tg/yr Tg B/yr as the annual flux of B in wet deposition over the
in 1976 to 4700 Tg/yr in 1999 [Energy Information Admin- ocean. Since the values in this limited data set are not
istration, 1999], possibly leading to an increase in the normally distributed, we prefer to use the median concen-
gaseous emission of B from coal combustion to as much as tration (6.6 ppb), which yields an estimate of 2.54 Tg B/yr
0.18 Tg/yr in 1999 (calculated following the works of Fogg for wet deposition over the oceans: at the lower end of the
and Duce [1985] and Anderson et al. [1994]). Anderson et al. range estimated by both Fogg and Duce [1985] and
estimated that particulate emissions of B from worldwide Anderson et al. [1994]. The wet deposition over the con-
coal combustion add 0.013 Tg B/yr to the atmosphere. Thus tinents, calculated with either the mean, 4.89 ± 1.2 (SE)
we estimate that present-day B release from coal combustion ppb, or median (4.35 ppb) value, is estimated as about 0.50
is likely to be about 0.20 Tg/yr. Tg B/yr (Table 2).
[14] World petroleum consumption in 1999 was about 2.1.2.2. Dry Deposition of Particulate Boron
3300 Tg/yr [Energy Information Administration, 1999] and [19] B exists as both particulates (Bp) and gases (Bg) in
this released 0.00049 Tg B/yr to the atmosphere [Anderson the atmosphere, with a 1:4 ratio between these forms over
et al., 1994]: a minor contribution to the global budget for B the land and a 1:22 ratio over the ocean (Table 3).
in the atmosphere. Particulate B exists with concentrations of 2 ± 0.44 (SE)
2.1.1.6. Biomass Burning ng/m3 over the remote oceans and 4.5 ± 1.03 (SE) ng/m3
[15] Andreae and Merlet [2001] estimate the annual over the continents. These particles are removed by wet and
combustion of biomass as 8600 Tg/yr (= 3870 Tg C) dry deposition. On land, dry deposition of various substan-
globally – in the range of earlier estimates from 2000 to ces is often equal to the wet deposition [Schlesinger, 1997],
5000 Tg C/yr [Crutzen and Andreae, 1990; Hao and Liu, so the global dry deposition of B on land could be as large
1994]. This new value represents the sum of carbon released as 0.50 Tg B/yr. This estimate is likely to represent the
during deforestation, natural biomass fires, biofuel burning, upper limit, as larger values are incompatible with the mass
charcoal making, charcoal burning, and the combustion of balance budget for B in the atmosphere.
agricultural residues. Assuming that the boron concentration [20] Erickson and Duce [1988] estimated the amount of
in biomass ranges from 30 to 50 ppm [Nriagu, 1979], the seasalt aerosols removed from the atmosphere by dry
boron flux to the atmosphere from biomass burning lies deposition over the world’s oceans as 0.8 – 2.2  1016
between 0.26 and 0.43 Tg B/yr. g/yr globally. Assuming that the majority of the atmospheric
2.1.1.7. Other Human Activities particulates over the oceans are from seasalt aerosols, and
[16] During the mining and processing of boron-containing that the total aerosol content of the marine atmosphere and
minerals, dust and gaseous boron are released to the atmos- its B concentration (Bp) are about 10,000 and 1.0 ng/m3 atm
phere, which are quantified as about 0.003 Tg B/yr by Argust (Table 3), respectively [Warneck, 1988], the dry deposition
[1998], and 0.009 Tg B/yr by Anderson et al. [1994]. About of particulate B over the oceans would be 0.8– 2.2 Tg/yr.
2.3  1012 g /yr of boron-containing compounds are used in This estimate for dry deposition of B at sea is about 10– 30
the world [Lyday, 1982]. Considering 30% of anhydrous times larger than the global estimate of dry deposition (0.07
boric acid (B2O3) and 11% of borax (Na12B4O710H2O) is Tg B/yr) calculated by Anderson et al. [1994], using 0.2
boron, Argust estimated the global industrial use of B at 0.31 cm/s as the dry deposition velocity [McCarthy, 1988]. The
Tg/yr. Anderson et al. estimated that the release of B to the at- aerosol content of the marine atmosphere shows great
mosphere during manufacturing would be about 0.02 Tg/yr. spatial and temporal variation, so better estimates of the
They also estimated the boron release to the atmosphere by dry deposition of B will require further study [Jahiruddin et
incineration as 0.045 Tg B/yr using the global amount of al., 1998].
materials incinerated each year, as estimated by Nriagu 2.1.2.3. Gaseous B Absorption Into the Seawater
[1989]. The sum of these industrial activities is likely to [21] At 25C, the concentration of boric acid vapor in the
release about 0.07 Tg B/yr to the atmosphere. atmosphere over the oceans predicted with Henry’s law con-
[17] All estimates of the atmospheric release of B are stant (H = 5  10 9g mair 3/g mseawater 3) is 20 ng/m3
based on an assumption that B is mainly in vapor form of [Duce, 1996], while field measurements report 40– 50 ng/m3
19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
PARK AND SCHLESINGER: GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF BORON 20 - 5

Table 2. Boron Concentration in Rainwater From Various Regions


Sample Areas Description [B], ppb (Mean) Reference
Continental Sites
Mississippi, USA continental 6.8 Boyd and Walley [1972]
Aiken, SC, USA continental 6.3 Boyd and Walley [1972]
Niwot ridge, Colo., USA continental 6.6 Fogg and Duce [1985]
College Park, Md., USA continental 1.0 Anderson et al. [1994]
Guildford, Surrey, UK inland 8.67 Mather and Porteous [2001]
Blewbury, Oxfordshire, UK inland 5.7 Mather and Porteous [2001]
Inverey, UK inland 10 Neal et al. [1997]
Himalaya continental 0.97 Rose et al. [2000b]
(At elevations over 1000 m) continental 15
continental 3
continental 0.97
continental 0.97
continental 0.97
Czech Republic continental 1.5 Kockova et al. [1998]
Mediana 4.35
Wetfall over the continents 1.1  1017 L/yr  4.4 ppb 0.48 Tg B/yr

Marine/Coastal Sites
Banchory, UK coast 26.4 Neal et al. [1997]
Isle of Wight, UK coast 15.8 Mather and Porteous [2001]
Narrangansett, R. I., USA coast 3.3 Fogg and Duce [1985]
American Samoa, USA open ocean 3.3 Boyd and Walley [1972]
Fogg and Duce [1985]
Enewetak, USA open ocean 4.5 Boyd and Walley [1972]
Fogg and Duce [1985]
Gulf Coast, Fla., USA (winter) coast 11.9 Martens and Harriss [1976]
Gulf Coast, Fla., USA (summer) coast 8.5 Martens and Harriss [1976]
Japan open ocean 4.7 Nishimura et al. [1973]
Lincoln, New Zealand coast 22.7 Herrmann [2001]
Barrytown, New Zealand coast 11.9 Herrmann [2001]
Mediana 6.6
Wetfall over open ocean/coast 3.85  1017 L/yr  6.6 ppb 2.54 Tg B/yr
a
Median is used due to the skewed data distributions. The mean values for continental and marine sites are 4.89 ± 1.16
(SE) ppb and 10.06 ± 2.3 (SE) ppb, respectively.

(Table 3). Therefore, the oceans would seem to serve as a atmosphere is only 5 – 13 days [Duce, 1996], the reasons for
sink for gaseous boron (Bg) [cf. Nishimura and Tanaka, an imbalance are unclear, but better estimates of the sources
1972]. This flux has been estimated at 1.6 Tg B/yr by Duce and sinks of B in the atmosphere must await further
using the dry deposition flux equation expressed as FA = investigation.
VdDCa where FA is the mass flux (mg/m2/s), Vd is the dry
deposition velocity for the chemical, and DCa is the 2.2. Land Flux
concentration difference of the chemical between the ocean 2.2.1. Input
and the atmosphere (ng/m3). Duce [1996] and Anderson et 2.2.1.1. Weathering
al. [1994] estimated DCa as 30 ng/m3 using the expected [23] Besides wet deposition, which we have already
boron concentration in the marine atmosphere of 20 ng/m3 examined as part of the atmospheric budget, the other
derived by H at 25C. When the temperature is lower than major source of boron on land derives boron from rock
20C, however, Fogg and Duce [1985] show that seasalt weathering, largely from carbonate rocks [You et al., 1993].
should become a ‘‘sink’’ for the boric acid gases. At the Garrels and MacKenzie [1971] estimated the amount of
mean temperature of Earth, 15C, DCa would be three times chemical weathering as 3.93  1015 g/yr, which yields a
lower (i.e., 10 ng/m3) than at 25C and the global flux to the weathering flux of 0.043 Tg B/yr using the mean B
sea surface would be 0.5 Tg B/yr. Although our new concentration of 11 ppm in the continental crust [Wede-
estimate of the flux of B gas from the atmosphere to the pohl, 1995]. Similarly, the boron mobilized by mechanical
world’s oceans is relatively small, we might expect some weathering is estimated as 0.15 Tg B/yr, using the global
geographic variation in its magnitude. estimate of mechanical weathering and the mean concen-
2.1.2.4. Atmospheric Deposition, Summary tration of B in the continental crust [Milliman and Meade,
[22] Even if we assume that there is no net flux of gaseous 1983].
boron to the sea, the total outflow of B from the atmosphere, 2.2.1.2. Anthropogenic Mobilization
4.3 Tg B/yr, is at least two times greater than the known [24] Borax and anhydrous boric acid are the most com-
sources of B in the atmosphere (Table 4). Uncertainties in monly used B compounds in industry. They play an
estimates of some of the larger flux terms do not preclude a important role in the global boron budget since the pertur-
balanced budget. Since the mean residence time for B in the bation caused by intensive human mining of B contributes
19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
20 - 6 PARK AND SCHLESINGER: GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF BORON

Table 3. Atmospheric B Concentration Over Continent and Ocean


Range (mean) Total [B], ng/m3 Reference
3 3
Bg, ng/m Bp, ng/m
Continental
College Park, Md. 5.4 – 22.9 (13.2) 4.7 – 10.7 (6.3) 19.5 Anderson et al. [1994]
5.0 – 30.4 (14.8) 0.5 – 8.8 (4.4) 19.2
5.1 – 32.2 (20.7) 3.2 – 6.7 (4.8) 25.5
Gaithersburg, Md. 1.0 – 9.2 (4.0) 0.6 – 13.6 (6.1) 10.1 Anderson et al. [1994]
1.0 – 9.2 (4.0) 1.0 – 2.6 (1.8) 5.8
Fairbanks, Alaskaa 0.2 – 0.9 (0.5) 5.2 – 17.6 (12.2) 12.7 Anderson et al. [1994]
Eastern, Ohiob 14 – 223 (77) 0.02 – 6.7 (1.9) 78.9 Fogg and Duce [1985]
Bellevue, Colo. 1.4 – 35 (16) 0.1 – 3.3 (1) 17 Fogg and Duce [1985]
... 1.3 – 4.3 (2.6)
Niwot Ridge, Colo. ... 2.8 – 6.0 (4.1) Fogg and Duce [1985]
Meanc 18.7 ± 8.68 4.5 ± 1.03 23.6 ± 8.19

Coastal Sites
Wallops Is, Va. 70.3 2.9 73.2 Anderson et al. [1994]
Lewes, Del. 3.5 3.7 7.2 Anderson et al. [1994]
La Jolla, Calif. 35 – 167 (71) 0.71 – 4.7 (2.7) 73.7 Fogg and Duce [1985]
Narragansett, R. I. 4.1 – 199 (48) 0.01 – 7.8 (2.1) 50.1 Fogg and Duce [1985]
Canterbury Plain, New Zealand 23.8 Hermann [2001]
(Springston/Lincoln)
Intramontane basin, New Zealand 17.3 Hermann [2001]
(Cass/Craigieburn)
West coast, New Zealand 55.1 Hermann [2001]
(Barrytown)
Tokyo Bay, Japan 42.5 (n = 2) Miyata et al. [2000]

Remote Marine Sites


High Point, Bermuda 10.5 1.1 11.6 Anderson et al. [1994]
Cape Kumukahi, Hawaii 25 0.5 25.5 Anderson et al. [1994]
Oahu, Hawaii 65 – 117 (97) 0.18 – 1.2 (0.56) 97 Fogg and Duce [1985]
American Samoa 1.5 – 5.2 Fogg and Duce [1985]
Open Ocean, Japan 88 (n = 14) Miyata et al. [2000]
Mean 46.5 ± 13.2 2.11 ± 0.44 47.1 ± 8.87
a
As indicated by the authors.
b
Polluted site.
c
Means are used with standard error.

B to its global cycle. The USGS [2000] recently estimated boric acid, borax, colemanite, and ulexite, is about 4.4 Tg
the global reserves of boron ores as about 170 Tg, which B [USGS, 2000], resulting in 0.31 Tg B/yr entering indus-
contain 30– 60 Tg B as determined by Argust [1998]. The trial use [Argust, 1998]. About half of processed boron is
annual extraction of boron-containing minerals, such as used in the manufacture of glass, fiberglass, and ceramics,
while the remainder is consumed in products that potentially
increase the supply of B that circulates in the environment
Table 4. Atmospheric Budget of Boron
[Argust, 1998]. For example, 6% of the total production is
Sources Budget, Tg B/yr used in making soap and detergent, 4% in making fire
Volcanoes (gas) 0.017 – 0.022 retardants, and 3% in making agricultural products. The
Soil dust 0.017 – 0.033 total human extraction of B from the Earth’s crust is
Plant aerosols 0.004 approximately 1.5 times that mobilized from the Earth’s
Fossil fuel combustion 0.20
Biomass burning 0.26 – 0.43
crust by rock weathering (Table 5).
Other human activities 0.07 2.2.2. Output
Seasalt 1.44 ± 0.9 2.2.2.1. River Discharge
Total 1.1 – 3.1 [25] The amount of dissolved boron transported in rivers
Sinks Budget, Tg B/yr has been estimated by Harriss [1969], Seyfried et al.
Wetfall [1984], and Lemarchand et al. [2000], with estimates
Land 0.5 ranging from 0.38 to 0.48 Tg B/yr. The suspended sediment
Sea 2.54 delivered to oceans is 13.5  1015 g/yr [Milliman and
Meade, 1983] and the mean boron concentration in crustal
Dryfall
Land 0.5 materials is about 11 ppm [Wedepohl, 1995], so the
Sea expected amount of boron flux via river particulates is
(Bp) 0.8 – 2.2 about 0.15 Tg B/yr. Thus the total transport of boron in
(Bg) 0.5 rivers removes about 0.53– 0.63 Tg B from the Earth’s land
Total 4.84 – 6.24
surface each year.
19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
PARK AND SCHLESINGER: GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF BORON 20 - 7

Table 5. Land Budget of Boron seawater flow rate from hot springs which have an average
Sources Budget, Tg B/yr
B concentration of 5.5 ppm. Our global estimate of the
high-temperature flux, 0.08 Tg B/yr, is derived as the mean
Atmospheric deposition
Wetfall 0.5
of these available values. In addition, fluid expelled from
Dryfall 0.5 accretionary prisms in subducting crust is estimated to carry
Rock weathering (chemical and mechanical) 0.193 about 0.02 Tg B/yr, another mechanism that releases B to
Mining extraction the ocean [Lemarchand et al., 2000]. These inputs are small
Mobile 0.15 compared to the delivery of B in rivers and by wetfall and
Immobile (e.g., glass) 0.16
Total 1.5 dryfall on the ocean’s surface.
2.3.2. Outputs
Sinks Budget, Tg B/yr
[30] Most studies of the geochemical cycle of boron in the
Rivers 0.53 – 0.63 oceans have identified six outputs: incorporation in carbonate
Plant aerosols 0.004
Dust 0.017 – 0.033 minerals, deposition in estuaries and sediment adsorption,
Biomass burning 0.26 – 0.43 pore water burial, low-temperature hydrothermal flux, sili-
Incineration 0.07 cate formation, and the preservation of sedimentary organic
Fossil fuel combustion 0.2 matter (Table 6). These are the long-term removals of B from
Landfill 0.29
Total 1.37 – 1.66
the seawater. However, as we shall see, seasalt production
removes a greater amount of boron (1.44 Tg B/yr) from the
ocean than removed by all of these combined together, and it
transfers B through the atmosphere to the land. Thus it should
2.2.2.2. Human Influences not be omitted from the list of oceanic outputs. Our view of
[26] Of the worldwide industrial consumption of boron, the global boron cycle, which includes transfers between the
0.31 Tg B [Argust, 1998], about 0.04 Tg B is released to the atmosphere and the oceans, is analogous to recent treatments
environment as a result of the use of soap and detergent (6%), of the global cycles of Cl [Graedel and Keene, 1995] and S
fertilizer (3%), and application of fire retardant (4%). Since [Brimblecombe et al., 1989], which also consider seawater-
most of these products are discharged into the rivers, we derived fluxes with short mean residence time in the atmos-
estimate that about 7% of the fluvial discharge of B is a phere.
consequence of human usage. An anthropogenic discharge of 2.3.2.1. Incorporation in Marine Carbonates
boron into rivers (0.025 Tg B/yr) was estimated by Lemarc- [31] Vengosh et al. [1991] provided the highest estimate
hand et al. [2000], who also suggested that about 7% of the of boron uptake by the precipitation of marine CaCO3,
total river content of boron has an anthropogenic origin. because their estimate of the boron concentration in normal
[27] The majority of boron products are likely to stay carbonates is about two times higher than other values
within the human society (e.g., 53% in glass industry), but reported in the literature. Spivack et al. [1987] indicated
they may return to the soil and to the groundwater after that the average boron content of limestones cannot be
being discarded and buried in landfills. Argust [1998] taken as representative of biogenic carbonates, due to the
estimated the amount of boron that enters landfills as 0.29 presence of even small amounts of clay contaminant.
Tg B/yr. Spivack et al. report B concentrations of 9 – 15.1 ppm in
2.2.2.3. Biogeochemical Cycling carbonates, using data from Furst et al. [1976], who
[28] The average B content in terrestrial organic matter is recovered samples precipitated directly from seawater.
between 30 and 50 ppm [Stone, 1990]. The global terrestrial
net primary production is reported by Field et al. [1998] as
56.4 Pg C/yr, so the global plant uptake of boron from soils Table 6. Ocean Budget of Boron
can be calculated as 4.5 Tg B/yr. Once used by plants, most
boron is fixed into cell walls and is not recycled internally. Sources Budget, Tg B/yr
Some B is returned to the atmosphere in the emission of Sea wetfall 2.54
plant aerosols or during biomass burning, but the majority is Sea dryfall 0.8 – 2.2
Gaseous adsorption 0.5
returned to the soil when plants die. Thus the internal
biogeochemical cycle of B on land is several folds larger River
than the inputs and outputs from the continents (Table 5). Dissolved 0.38 – 0.48
Particulates 0.15
2.3. Oceanic Flux High T-hydrothermal 0.08
2.3.1. Inputs Fluid expelled 0.02
Total 4.47 – 5.97
2.3.1.1. High-Temperature Hydrothermal Flux and
Expelled Fluid Sinks Budget, Tg B/yr
[29] In addition to atmospheric inputs and the riverine Carbonates 0.04
flux just described, You et al. [1993] suggested that high- Marine sediment 0.18
Silicates 0.004 – 0.032
temperature hydrothermal vents are a significant source of Pore water 0.006
boron to ocean waters. Spivack and Edmond [1987] and Low T-flux 0.08 – 0.27
You et al. estimated the boron flux through hydrothermal Organic burial 0.014
vents as 0.004 – 0.042 Tg B/yr, while Seyfried et al. [1984] Seasalt 1.44 ± 0.9
Total 0.86 – 2.88
estimated it as 0.13 Tg B/yr. Seyfried et al. used the
19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
20 - 8 PARK AND SCHLESINGER: GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF BORON

Pennisi et al. [2000] report the mean concentration of B in 2.3.2.5. Biogenic Silicates
marine carbonates as 12.5 ppm. An upper-limit estimate for [35] Silicate formation by biogenic processes also removes
boron removal from ocean waters is provided by the total boron from the seawater, burying it into marine sediment.
carbonate production, 3200 g CaCO3/yr by Milliman Tréguer et al. [1995] provided an estimate of the input of
[1993], which would carry 0.04 Tg B/yr, intermediate dissolved Si to the world’s oceans, 171 Tg Si/yr, largely
between the prior estimates of Spivak et al. [1987] derived from chemical weathering of the land surface.
(0.005 – 0.012 Tg B/yr) and Vengosh et al. [1991] (0.064 Assuming a steady state Si concentration in seawater, this
Tg B/yr). We do not consider aragonite or dolomite as a new estimation of Si input would indicate a loss of about
boron sink because aragonite is more easily dissolved than 0.03 Tg B/yr by incorporation in marine silicates, calculated
calcite, and only small amounts of dolomite are deposited assuming 84 ppm of B in silicates [Pennisi et al., 2000].
in today’s oceans. Earlier, assuming B content of 75 ppm in diatomaceous
2.3.2.2. Deposition in Estuaries and Sediment material, Harriss [1969] estimated that the production of
Adsorption biogenic silicates carries 0.027 Tg B/yr to marine sediments.
[32] Liss and Pointon [1973] first noted the removal of B [36] Alternatively, Spivack et al. [1987] suggested 11 ppm
during the mixing of river and seawaters. Spivack et al. of boron in biogenic opal. Given this concentration, they
[1987] estimated estuarine removal as about 0.099 Tg B/yr, estimated the removal of boron from the oceans by the
which includes B removed in estuaries before their waters formation of biogenic silica at 0.0038 Tg B/yr. Tréguer et al.
enter the oceans and/or during mixing of water in tidal [1995] estimated that only 3% of the gross production of
areas. In addition to boron buried in estuarine sediment, biogenic silicates is preserved in marine sediments, which
dissolved boron is adsorbed on clay minerals and added to would carry 0.004 – 0.032 Tg B/yr to the sediments, depend-
marine sediments globally. Estimates of the boron removal ing on assumptions regarding the B content of opal. Thus
by clay adsorption agree within a factor of three among for the global budget, we estimate that the formation of
different studies [Seyfried et al., 1984; Vengosh et al., 1991; biogenic silicates in the oceans carries <0.03 Tg B/yr to
Smith et al., 1991], with a mean flux of 0.18 Tg B/yr, which marine sediments.
we take as the best estimate of the total removal of B from 2.3.2.6. Biogeochemical Cycling and the Organic Sink
the oceans by this process. [37] Biological uptake of boron by primary production was
2.3.2.3. Pore Water Burial proposed as an important sink for boron in ocean [Harriss,
[33] Pore water burial has also been suggested as a 1969]. However, most organic materials are degraded
mechanism of boron removal from seawater, estimated by quickly in the oceans, so biotic uptake should be considered
Spivack and Edmond [1987] at 0.008 Tg B/yr. If the pore as a form of internal cycling that does not contribute to the
water burial of B and Cl is proportional to their concen- long-term removal of B from seawater. Pennisi et al. [2000]
tration in seawater and 25 Tg Cl/yr is buried by this process estimated a boron concentration of 43 ppm in marine
globally [Berner and Berner, 1996], then we estimate that organisms. Assuming marine net primary production is
0.006 Tg B/yr is removed from the oceans by pore water 48.5  1015 g C/yr [Field et al., 1998], with a carbon content
burial each year. Both estimates constitute only a minor flux of 50%, 4.3 Tg B/yr must circulate in the internal biogeo-
in the global B cycle. chemical cycle of boron in ocean. If 0.157  1015 g C/yr
2.3.2.4. Low-Temperature Hydrothermal Flux represents the net incorporation of organic carbon into
[34] Low-temperature hydrothermal circulation captures oceanic sediments [Berner, 1982], then the estimated boron
soluble elements from seawater in the oceanic crust. deposition in organic sediments will be about 0.014 Tg B/yr.
Although estimates of the removal of B from seawater by
this process range from 0.08 to 0.27 Tg B/yr, the prepon-
derance of values is found at the lower end of this range 3. Discussion
(Table 7). This estimate of the removal of B in low-
temperature hydrothermal systems may be too low as [38] Tables 4 – 6 summarize the boron budget in each
recent studies have identified considerable areas of off-axis realm of its global cycle. The budget for land is remarkably
hydrothermal activity [Kelley et al., 2001] that may repre- well balanced, whereas for the atmosphere outputs > inputs,
sent additional B sinks. In any case, considering the as has been noted previously [Duce, 1996].
balance of high- and low-temperature processes, hydro- [39] We believe that the annual deposition of B in
thermal systems seem to provide a net sink of B from the precipitation (wetfall) is the best-known value in the atmos-
oceans. pheric budget. By itself, the flux in wetfall is roughly
double the estimate of the largest input to the atmosphere:
1.44 Tg B/yr from seasalt aerosols (Table 4). It is possible
that we have overestimated the wet and/or dry deposition of
Table 7. Literature Review of Low T-Flux Estimation B from the atmosphere, particularly over the oceans. How-
ever, the imbalance in the atmospheric budget for B would
Low T-Flux Estimation, Tg B/yr Reference
persist, even if the B content of marine rains is half of the
Experimental value 0.16 – 0.19 Seyfried et al. [1984] average value that we derive from available data (Table 2).
0.14 Spivack and Edmond [1987]
0.083 Thompson [1983] By using the Bg and Bp concentrations from Table 3, we
0.27 Smith et al. [1995] calculated the pool of Bg = 0.14 Tg B, and Bp = 0.024 Tg B
0.11 You et al. [1993] in the troposphere, and the mean residence time of boron in
Estimate 0.08 – 0.27 This study the atmosphere is 14– 21 days (11 – 18 days for Bg and 2 – 3
19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
PARK AND SCHLESINGER: GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF BORON 20 - 9

Table 8. Comparisons of Sources of Materials to the Global Atmospherea


Element Anthropogenic Natural Ratio
Industrial/Fossil fuel Biomass Burning Seasalt Continental Dust Volcanic Anthropogenic: Natural
SO4 (S) 90 1.89 144 8 10 0.57
B 0.26 0.35 1.44 0.03 0.02 0.41
C1 5 0.5 6000 2 0.00092
a
All data in Tg/yr, with those for S and Cl taken from Schlesinger [1997].

days for Bp, respectively). Given these short mean resi- [43] As is the case for many biogeochemical cycles, the
dence times, we suspect that we have underestimated or circulation of B within the terrestrial and marine biospheres
overlooked other processes that may contribute B to the is much greater than the annual net inputs and outputs from
atmosphere. these realms. This situation usually arises when limited
[40] We used several different approaches to estimate the supplies of an element are available for plant uptake,
seasalt injection of B to the atmosphere. These show good leading to the evolution of efficient internal biogeochemical
agreement, and we believe this estimate is well constrained. cycling in the ecosystem. Subba Rao [1981] shows B
In previous work, Fogg and Duce [1985] estimated 1.5 Tg limitations to the growth of marine phytoplankton, but in
B/yr as the amount of boron reaching the atmosphere from the North Pacific Ocean, the depth distribution of B in
volcanoes. However, the additional data compiled here seawater indicates conservative behavior, suggesting that
indicate that the contribution of B to the atmosphere by the B concentration is unlikely to be controlled by the
volcanoes is relatively small. Among other potential sour- growth of phytoplankton [Nozaki, 1996].
ces, higher fluxes of B to the atmosphere from human [44] Known global reserves of B will supply current
activities are incompatible with the widespread observation human demand for about 100 years. A large proportion of
that the B content of rainfall is greater over the oceans. the human production of B is sequestered in the manufac-
Clearly, resolution of the atmospheric budget for B will ture of borosilicate glass, and only about half of the human
require further study. mobilization of the B from the Earth’s crust would be
[41] Imbalance in the budget for B in the oceans derives expected in mobile forms that contribute to the B content
from an imbalance in the large fluxes of B between the of surface waters. B from atmospheric deposition plus a
oceans and the atmosphere. Indeed, without these fluxes, smaller amount mobilized from rock weathering can easily
the input in river flow closely balances the sum of various account for the annual B transport in rivers. The mass of
outputs by sedimentary processes and hydrothermal alter- boron on the land surface is about 2200 Tg B, calculated by
ation, as noted by Harriss [1969] and Lemarchand et al. taking the mean boron concentration of 11 ppm in soils and
[2000]. Nevertheless, a global budget must include the the mass of surface soil (2.2  108 Tg; Chameides and
atmospheric flux, because a small amount of B moves Perdue [1997]). This indicates 1700 years as the mean
through the atmosphere to the land surface, where it residence time of boron on the land surface (2400 years
contributes to the B circulation in vegetation and to the without the human perturbation), calculated using either the
B content of stream waters [Rose et al., 2000b; Jahiruddin estimated inputs or outputs of boron from the Earth’s land
et al., 1998]. The net transport of B through the atmos- surface.
phere to land is estimated as 0.012 Tg B/yr, assuming that [45] The human impact on the global biogeochemical
the transport of B is proportional to the net landward cycle of B rivals that seen for other elements of interest to
transport of Cl from seasalt aerosols [Graedel and Keene, modern society: e.g., N, P, and S. Human activities have a
1995]. In future work, identification of a large and hitherto major impact on the transport of S through the atmosphere
unknown flux of B from seawater to the atmosphere would (Table 8). The impact on B is slightly less severe, but the
allow simultaneous reconciliation of both the atmospheric atmospheric burden of B is clearly elevated compared to
and marine compartments in the global biogeochemical that of a conservative element such as Cl. Potential human
cycle of B. contributions to the B transport in rivers rival those for P,
[42] The oceans are the largest global reservoir for boron, although both are much less than the human impact on
and many studies show that the boron concentration in the riverine N transport (Table 9). The world’s oceans are likely
ocean has been constant for the last 10 Myr [Lemarchand to have experienced a net increase in dissolved B concen-
et al., 2000]. The estimated boron mass in the ocean tration, albeit a minor percent change, since the beginning
reservoir assuming a uniform concentration of 4.6 mg/l of of the Industrial Revolution. The global biogeochemical
boron in seawater is about 6.2  106 Tg. Relative to total
outputs, which include the seasalt injection to the atmos-
phere, we suggest that B in seawater has a mean residence Table 9. Anthropogenic Transport in World Riversa
time of 3.3 Myr, shorter than recent estimates of 20 Myr by Element River Transport World Industrial Ratio:
Spivack and Edmond [1987] and 14 Myr by Lemarchand et Production Anthropogenic/Natural
al. [2000]. This shorter mean residence time for B has B 0.53 – 0.63 0.31 0.5
implications for the use of B isotopes in carbonates to N 35 100 2.86
estimate changes in the pH of seawater during paleoclimates P 21 12 0.57
a
[Royer et al., 2001]. N and P data are procured from Schlesinger [1997].
19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
20 - 10 PARK AND SCHLESINGER: GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF BORON

cycle of B is worthy of further study, with investigations Field, C. B., M. J. Behrenfeld, J. T. Randerson, and P. Falkowski, Primary
focused on the processes that control the flux of B through production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic compo-
nents, Science, 281, 237 – 240, 1998.
the atmosphere. Fogg, T. R., and R. A. Duce, Boron in the troposphere: Distribution and
fluxes, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 3781 – 3796, 1985.
Furst, M., H. A. Lowenstam, and D. S. Burnett, Radiographic study of the
[46] Acknowledgments. We thank Robert Duce at Texas A&M Uni- distribution of boron in recent mollusc shells, Geochim. Cosmochim.
versity, Richard Birnie of Dartmouth College, John Hulston at the Institute Acta, 40, 1381 – 1386, 1976.
of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Fred Anderson at University of Garrels, R. M., and F. T. MacKenzie, Evolution of Sedimentary Rocks,
Chicago, and Bill Rose at Michigan Technical Institute for their advice Norton, New York, 1971.
and help in completing this study. Glass, S. J., and M. J. Matteson, Ion enrichment in aerosols dispersed from
bursting bubbles in aqueous salt solutions, Tellus, 25, 272 – 280, 1973.
Goldberg, S., Reactions of boron with soils, Plant Soil, 193, 35 – 48, 1997.
References Gong, S. L., L. A. Barrie, J. M. Prospero, D. L. Savoie, G. P. Ayers, J. P.
Anderson, D. L., M. E. Kitto, L. McCarthy, and W. H. Zoller, Sources and Blanchet, and L. Spacek, Modeling sea-salt aerosols in the atmosphere, 2,
atmospheric distribution of particulate and gas phase boron, Atmos. En- Atmospheric concentrations and fluxes, J. Geophys. Res., 61, 3819 –
viron., 28, 1401 – 1410, 1994. 3830, 1997.
Andreae, M. O., and P. Merlet, Emission of trace gases and aerosols from Graedel, T. E., and W. C. Keene, Tropospheric budget of reactive chlorine,
biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 15, 955 – 966, 2001. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 9, 47 – 77, 1995.
Argust, P., Distribution of boron in the environment, Biol. Trace Elem. Res., Hao, W. M., and M. H. Liu, Spatial and temporal distribution of tropical
66, 131 – 143, 1998. biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 8, 495 – 503, 1994.
Arnórsson, S., and A. Andrésdóttir, Processes controlling the distribution of Harriss, R. C., Boron regulation in the oceans, Nature, 223, 290 – 291,
boron and chlorine in natural waters in Iceland, Geochim. Cosmochim. 1969.
Acta, 59, 4125 – 4146, 1995. Hemming, N. G., and G. N. Hanson, Boron isotopic composition and
Basharina, L. A., Water extracts of gases from Bezymyanni volcano ash concentration in modern marine carbonates, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta,
cloud, Bull. Volcanol. Studies, 27, 38 – 42, Akad. Nauk. U.S.S.R. (in Rus- 56, 537 – 543, 1992.
sian), 1965. Herrmann, R., On processes controlling the distribution and fluxes of boron
Bates, T. S., B. K. Lamb, A. Guenther, J. Dignon, and R. E. Stoiber, Sulfur in natural waters and air along transects across the South Island of New
emissions to the atmosphere from natural sources, J. Atmos. Chem., 14, Zealand, Catena, 44, 263 – 284, 2001.
315 – 337, 1992. Holland, H. D., The Chemistry of the Atmosphere and Oceans, John Wiley,
Berner, R. A., Burial of organic carbon and pyrite sulfur in the modern New York, 1978.
ocean: Its geochemical and environmental significance, Am. J. Sci., 282, Holmén, K., The global carbon cycle, in Earth System Science, edited by
451 – 473, 1982. M. C. Jacobson, et al., pp. 282 – 321, Academic, San Diego, Calif., 2000.
Berner, E. K., and R. A. Berner, Global Environment; Water, Air and Hulston, J. R., and J. E. Lupton, Helium isotope studies of geothermal
Geochemical Cycles, Prentice-Hall Inc., Old Tappan, N.J., 1996. fields in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand, J. Volcanol. Geotherm.
Bernier, B., and M. Brazeau, Magnesium deficiency symptoms associated Res., 74, 297 – 321, 1996.
with sugar maple dieback in a lower Laurentians site in southeastern Jahiruddin, M., R. Smart, A. J. Wade, C. Neal, and M. S. Cresser, Factors
Quebec, Can. J. For. Res., 18, 1265 – 1269, 1988. regulating the distribution of boron in water in the River Dee catchment
Bolanos, L., E. Esteban, C. Delorenzo, M. Fernandezpascual, M. R. Defe- in north east Scotland, Sci. Total Environ., 210, 53 – 62, 1998.
lipe, A. Garate, and I. Bonilla, Essentiality of boron for symbiotic dini- Jin, J., D. C. Martens, and L. W. Zelazny, Distribution and plant availability
trogen fixation in pea (Pisum sativum) rhizobium nodules, Plant Physiol., of soil boron fractions, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51, 1228 – 1231, 1987.
104, 85 – 90, 1994. Jonas, P. R., R. J. Charlson, and H. Rodhe, Aerosols, in Climate Change
Boyd, C. E., and W. W. Walley, Studies of the biogeochemistry of boron, 1, 1994, edited by J. T. Houghton et al., pp. 127 – 162, Cambridge Univ.
Concentrations in surface waters, rainfall and aquatic plants, Am. Mid- Press, New York, 1995.
land Nat., 88, 1 – 14, 1972. Kelley, D. S., et al., An off-axis hydrothermal vent field near the Mid-
Braker, W., and A. L. Mossman, Matheson Gas Data Book, Matheson Gas Atlantic Ridge at 30N, Nature, 412, 145 – 149, 2001.
Products, Inc., Lyndhurst, N.J., 1980. Kockova, E., M. Palat, and M. Betusova, Bioelements and heavy metals in
Brimblecombe, P., C. Hammer, H. Rodhe, A. Ryaboshapko, and C. F. dry and wet depositions at some localities in the Morava River Basin,
Boutron, Human influence on the sulphur cycle, in Evolution of the Water Sci. Technol., 33, 277 – 283, 1998.
Global Biogeochemical Sulphur Cycle, edited by P. Brimblecombe and Koutz, F. R., Jr., Boron geochemistry of Central American volcanoes, M.S.
A. Y. Lein, pp. 77 – 121, John Wiley, New York, 1989. thesis, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H., 1971.
Camacho-Cristobal, J. J., and A. G. Fontes, Boron deficiency causes a Lemarchand, D., J. Gaillardet, E. Lewin, and C. J. Allegre, The influence of
drastic decrease in nitrate content and nitrate reductase activity, and in- rivers on marine boron isotopes and implications for reconstructing past
creases the content of carbohydrates in leaves from tobacco plants, Plan- ocean pH, Nature, 408, 951 – 954, 2000.
ta, 209, 528 – 536, 1999. Liss, P. J., and M. J. Pointon, Removal of dissolved boron and silicon
Chahine, M. T., The hydrologic cycle and its influence on climate, Nature, during estuarine mixing of sea and river waters, Geochim. Cosmochim.
359, 373 – 380, 1992. Acta, 37, 1493 – 1498, 1973.
Chameides, W. L., and M. Perdue, Global biogeochemical cycles: A com- Lyday, P. A., History of production and processing of boron, Abstr. Pap.
puter-interactive study of earth system, in Science and Global Change, p. Am. Chem. Soc., 204, 4-Hist. Part 1, 1982.
225, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1997. Martens, C. S., and R. C. Harriss, Boron in coastal north Florida rainfall,
Chen, X., S. Schauder, N. Potier, A. V. Dorsslaer, I. Pelczer, B. L. Bassler, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 6371 – 6375, 1976.
and F. M. Hughson, Structural identification of a bacteria quorum-sensing Mather, J. D., and N. C. Porteous, The geochemistry of boron and its
signal containing boron, Nature, 415, 545 – 549, 2002. isotopes in groundwaters from marine and non-marine sandstone aqui-
Crutzen, P. J., and M. O. Andreae, Biomass burning in the tropics; Impact fers, Appl. Geochem., 16, 821 – 834, 2001.
on atmospheric chemistry and biogeochemical cycles, Science, 250, McCarthy, L. E., Wintertime composition of precipitation, atmospheric
1669 – 1678, 1990. particles and gases in College Park, MD, M.S. thesis, Univ. of Maryland,
Duce, R. A., Sources, distribution, and fluxes of mineral aerosols and their College Park, MD, 1988.
relationship to climate, in Aerosol Forcing of Climate, edited by R. Milliman, J. D., Production and accumulation of calcium carbonate in the
Charlson and J. Heintzenberg, pp. 43 – 72, John Wiley, New York, 1995. ocean: Budget of an unsteady state, Global Biogeochem. Cyles, 7, 927 –
Duce, R. A., Atmospheric biogeochemical cycles of selenium, arsenic and 957, 1993.
boron, in Physics and Chemistry of the Atmosphere of the Earth and Milliman, J. D., and R. H. Meade, World wide delivery of river sediment to
Other Objects of the Solar System, edited by C. Boutron, pp. 157 – the oceans, J. Geol., 91, 1 – 21, 1983.
182, Les Editions de Physique, Les Ulis, France, 1996. Miyata, Y., T. Tokieda, H. Amakawa, M. Uematsu, and Y. Nozaki, Boron
Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and isotope variations in the atmosphere, Tellus, Ser. B, 52, 1057 – 1065,
Alternate Fuels, U.S. Department of EnergyWashington, D. C. 20585, 2000.
1999. (Available at http://eia.doe.gov/indexnjava.html.) Möller, D., The Na/Cl ratio in rainwater and the seasalt chloride cycle,
Erickson, D. J., III, and R. A. Duce, On the global flux of atmospheric sea Tellus, Ser. B, 42, 254 – 262, 1990.
salt, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 14,079 – 14,088, 1988. Neal, C., et al., Major, minor, trace element and suspended sediment varia-
19449224, 2002, 4, Downloaded from https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001GB001766 by Cochrane Greece, Wiley Online Library on [28/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
PARK AND SCHLESINGER: GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE OF BORON 20 - 11

tions in the River Tweed: Results from the LOIS core monitoring pro- isotopic composition of altered oceanic crust, Chem. Geol., 126, 119 –
gram, Sci. Total Environ., 194, 193 – 205, 1997. 135, 1995.
Nishimura, M., and K. Tanaka, Seawater may not be a source of boron in Spivack, A. J., and J. M. Edmond, Boron isotope exchange between sea-
the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 5239 – 5242, 1972. water and the oceanic crust, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 51, 1033 –
Nishimura, M., S. Nakaya, and K. Tanaka, Boron in the atmosphere and 1043, 1987.
precipitation: Is the sea the source of atmospheric boron? in Proceedings Spivack, A. J., M. R. Palmer, and J. M. Edmond, The sedimentary cycle of
IAGC Symposium on Hydrogeochemistry and Biogeochemistry, pp. 547 – the boron isotopes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 51, 1939 – 1949, 1987.
557, Clarke Company, Washington, D. C., 1973. Spivack, A. J., C. F. You, and H. J. Smith, Foraminiferal boron isotope
Nozaki, Y., A fresh look at element distribution in the North Pacific, 1996. ratios as a proxy for surface ocean pH over the past 21-Myr, Nature, 363,
(Available at http://www.agu.org/eos_elec/97025e-table.html.) 149 – 151, 1993.
Nriagu, J. O., Global inventory of natural and anthropogenic emissions of Stone, E. L., Boron deficiency and excess in forest trees: A review, For.
trace metals to the atmosphere, Nature, 279, 409 – 411, 1979. Ecol. Manage., 37, 49 – 75, 1990.
Nriagu, J. O., A global assessment of natural sources of atmospheric trace- Subba Rao, D. V., Effect of boron on primary production of nanoplankton,
metals, Nature, 338, 47 – 49, 1989. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 38, 52 – 58, 1981.
O’Neill, M. A., S. Eberhard, P. Albersheim, and A. G. Darvill, Requirement Tegen, I., and I. Fung, Contribution to the atmospheric mineral aerosol load
of borate cross-linking of cell wall rhamnogalacturonan II for Arabidop- from land surface modification, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 18,707 – 18,726,
sis growth, Science, 294, 846 – 849, 2001. 1995.
Pearson, P. N., and M. R. Palmer, Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentra- Thompson, G., Hydrothermal fluxes in the ocean, Chem. Oceanogr., 8, 61 –
tions over the past 60 million years, Nature, 406, 695 – 699, 2000. 65, 1983.
Pennisi, M., W. P. Leeman, S. Tonarini, A. Pennisi, and P. Nabelek, Boron, Tréguer, P., D. M. Nelson, A. J. Vanbennekom, D. J. Demaster, A. Ley-
Sr, O and H isotope geochemistry of groundwaters from Mt. Etna (Si- naert, and B. Queguiner, The silica balance in the world ocean: A rees-
cily)-hydrologic implications, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 64, 961 – 974, timate, Science, 268, 375 – 379, 1995.
2000. U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, (Available at
Rose, E. F., J. Carignan, and M. Chaussidon, Transfer of atmospheric http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/boron/120300.pdf ),
boron from the oceans to the continents: An investigation using pre- Reston, Va., February 2000.
cipitation waters and epiphytic lichens, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., Vengosh, A., Y. Kolodny, A. Starinsky, A. R. Chivas, and M. T. McCul-
2000a. (Available at http://g_cubed.org/gc2000/2000GC000077/ loch, Coprecipitation and isotopic fractionation of boron in modern bio-
fs2000GC000077.html.) genic carbonates, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 55, 2901 – 2910, 1991.
Rose, E. F., M. Chaussidon, and C. France-Lanord, Fractionation of boron Warneck, P., Chemistry of the Natural Atmosphere, Academic, San Diego,
isotopes during erosion processes: The example of Himalayan rivers, Calif., 1988.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 64, 397 – 408, 2000b. Wedepohl, K. H., The composition of the continental crust, Geochim. Cos-
Royer, D. L., R. A. Berner, and D. J. Beerling, Phanerozoic atmospheric mochim. Acta, 59, 1217 – 1232, 1995.
CO2 change: Evaluating geochemical and paleobiological approaches, White, D. E., G. A. Waring, Data of Geochemistry, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof.
Earth Sci. Rev., 54, 349 – 402, 2001. Pap., 440-K, 29, 1963.
Sanyal, A., N. G. Hemming, G. N. Hanson, and W. S. Broecker, Evidence Xu, J. M., K. Wang, R. W. Bell, Y. A. Yang, and L. B. Huang, Soil boron
for a higher pH in the glacial ocean from boron isotopes in foraminifera, fractions and their relationship to soil properties, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65,
Nature, 373, 234 – 236, 1995. 133 – 138, 2001.
Schlesinger, W. H., Biogeochemistry; An Analysis of Global Change, Aca- You, C. F., A. J. Spivack, J. H. Smith, and J. M. Gieskes, Mobilization of
demic, San Diego, Calif., 1997. boron in convergent margins: Implications for the boron geochemical
Seyfried, W. E., D. R. Janecky, and M. J. Mottl, Alteration of the oceanic cycle, Geology, 21, 207 – 210, 1993.
crust: Implications for geochemical cycles of lithium and boron, Geo-
chim. Cosmochim. Acta, 48, 557 – 569, 1984.
Shelp, B. J., Physiology and biochemistry of boron in plants, in Boron and
its Role in Crop Production, edited by U. C. Gupta, pp. 53 – 85, CRC
Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1993. H. Park, Department of Geosciences, Guyot Hall, Princeton University,
Smith, H. J., H. Staudigel, and A. J. Spivack, The boron isotopic composi- Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. (haewonp@princeton.edu)
tion of the oceanic crust: Results from DSDP sites 417 and 418, Eos W. H. Schlesinger, Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas
Trans. AGU, 72, 532, 1991. School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham,
Smith, H. J., A. J. Spivack, H. S. Staudigel, and S. R. Hart, The boron NC 27708, USA. (schlesin@duke.edu)

You might also like