Design Response Spectrum (ASCE 7-10)

Mapped acceleration parameter in Poipet Ss  0.042g S1  0.03g

(Srakaew, Thailand)
Site Classification Class D

Site coefficient Fa  1.6 Fv  2.4

2
Design ground acceleration SDS   Fa Ss  0.045  g
3
2
SD1   Fv  S1  0.048  g
3

Important factor Ie  1

Response Modification Factor R  4.5

Design response spectrum

SD1
Corner period Ts   s  1.071 s
SDS

Reference period T0  0.2Ts  0.214 s

Limited period TL  8s

Acceleration at zero period As  0.4 SDS  0.018  g

T  0s 0.01s  TL

A  S  A   T  if 0  T  T
Csm( T)   s  DS s  T  0
  0 
SDS if T0  T  Ts

SD1
 s if Ts  T  TL
T

SSD Engineering Center 1

 Design Response Spectrum
0.1
Elastic
2
8.333 10 Design
Spectral Acceleration
Csm( T)
2
6.667 10
g

Csm( T) 2
5 10
R
g 2
3.333 10
Ie
2
1.667 10

0
0 0.83 1.67 2.5 3.33 4.17 5
T T

Nateral Period (sec)

Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure

T  0s 0.01s  TL

Cs( T)  SDS if 0  T  Ts

SD1
 s if Ts  T  TL
T
TL SD1
 s if T  TL
2
T

SSD Engineering Center 2

 Design Response Spectrum
0.1
Elastic
2
8.333 10 Design
Spectral Acceleration
Cs ( T)
2
6.667 10
g

Cs ( T) 2
5 10
R
g 2
3.333 10
Ie
2
1.667 10

0
0 1.33 2.67 4 5.33 6.67 8
T T

Nateral Period (sec)

Ct  0.0488

x  0.75

h n  58.9m

x
 hn 
Ta  Ct    1.038
m
Cu  1.4 if SD1  0.4g  1.7

1.4 if 0.3g  SD1  0.4g

1.5 if 0.2g  SD1  0.3g

1.6 if 0.15g  SD1  0.2g

1.7 otherwise

T  Cu  Ta s  1.764 s

Tcomputed  3.62s


T  min T Tcomputed  1.764 s 
T
k  0.5  0.75  1.632
s

Cs( T) 3
Cs   6.047  10 g
R
Ie

SSD Engineering Center 3

 Cs,min  
max 0.044SDS Ie 0.01g  if S1  0.6g  0.01 g ASCE 7-10 12.8.5 and 12.8.6

 0.5S1 
max 0.044SDS Ie 0.01g  otherwise
 R 
 Ie 
 


Cs  max Cs Cs,min  0.01 g 
W  9572041.46kg Effective Seismic Weight

Vspectrum  Cs W  938.697  kN Seismic data from ្រសៈែកវ

0.05g  W 3
V   1.043  10  kN Seismic coefficient 0.05g/R
R
Ie

Floor level Floor elevation Effective seismic weight

i  16  0 
 58.9   268154.04 
16
 53.5   596764.44 
15
 49.8   620460.57 
14  46.1   620460.57 
13    
 42.4   620460.57 
12
 38.7   620460.57 
11    
10  35   620460.57 
9
 31.3   620460.57 
8 h   27.6  w   620460.57  kg
   
7  23.9   620460.57 
6  20.2   620460.57 
 16.5   620460.57 
5    
4  12.8   620460.57 
3  9.1   606284.6 
   
2  5.4   667398.79 
...  2   582268.59 
 0   26104.73 

n  length ( i)  17

Fx = Cvx V

x  1 2  n

 x
k
w  h
x
Cv =
x n

  j
k
w h
j
j1

 x
k
W  w  h
x x

SSD Engineering Center 4

  x
k
w  h
x
Cv 
x n

 W
j
j1

Fx  Cv  V Fx_spectrum  Cv  Vspectrum

Lateral seismic force (Fx) induced at each floor level

n n n

  
3
Floor No. Cv  1 Fx  1.043  10  kN Fx_spectrum  938.697  kN
j j j
j1 j1 j1

16 0.078 81.481 73.333

15 0.149 154.997 139.497
14 0.137 143.365 129.028
13 0.121 126.394 113.755
12 0.106 110.263 99.237
11 0.091 94.999 85.499
10 0.077 80.63 72.567
9 0.064 67.191 60.472
i 8 Cv  0.052 Fx  54.72  kN Fx_spectrum  49.248  kN
7 0.041 43.265 38.939
6 0.032 32.88 29.592
5 0.023 23.634 21.271
4 0.015 15.616 14.055
3 8.384·10-3 8.745 7.87
2 3.938·10-3 4.108 3.697
1 6.794·10-4 0.709 0.638
0 0 0 0

seismic coefficient 5%g spectrum at srakeov

Response Spectrum Analysis

Design parameters R  4.5 Cd  4

Base shear from RSA using ETABS Vb_RSAx  143.396kN Vb_RSAy  228kN

Base shear from ELF Vb_ELFx  Vspectrum  938.697  kN

Vb_ELFy  Vspectrum  938.697  kN

Vb_ELFx 0.85
Scaling factor SF x   5.564
Vb_RSAx

Vb_ELFy 0.85
SF y   3.5
Vb_RSAy

Vspectrum 0.85  797.892  kN

SSD Engineering Center 5

SSD Engineering Center 6