ENGL 182 192 Peer and Self Assessment Assignment - 5 Pts

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Assessor’s Name Aydoğan Tekmen Assessor’s student no.

20000037
Presenter’s Name Osman Şehitoğulları Presenter’s Topic Nuclear Waste
Date 31/05/22 Time spent 5.50
ENGL 182 192 Peer & Self-Assessment Assignment (5%)

TASK A (1 pt.): Assess your peer. Grade each item referring to the descriptors. First, write a grade for
each item in the grade column; then, write the total grade in the space provided below.
Grade Distribution
Item Descriptors
Excellent Good Satisfactory Weak Grade
The presentation has:
1. a greeting , self-introduction, an overview
2. an introduction (hook, background, main
idea)
Content &
Organization
3. main points 6 5-4 3 2-1
4. relevant supporting ideas, explanation,
examples
5. a conclusion
6. a coherent organization (signposting)
Slides:
1. include specific, concise notes
2. are error free
3. include relevant effective images
Visual Aids
4. have appropriate font (24+ ) and image 6 5-4 3 2-1
size
5. have appropriate font style and
background color
6. are easy on the eye – followed with ease
Delivery 1. appropriate volume, intonation, and speed
2. strong positive feeling accompanied by
(Points 1-7 gestures
will not be 3. accurate pronunciation without affecting
assessed if meaning
the 4. successfully conveyed message with
presenter is accurate language 8-7 6-5 4 3-1
reading 5. fluency with natural hesitations displaying
from the self-confidence without depending on notes
script) 6. concurrency between slides and verbal
content
7. adherence to time limit (6-8 mins)
8. questions: appropriately invited, responded

Total
Grade
18 /20
TASK B (1 pt.): Write 2 comments about the presentation by referring to the criteria.
 The presentation could be better if a presentation was used more relevant
General
Comments
examples
 My second comment is the presentation was great as a result of good
introduction and it was accurate pronunciation without affecting meaning
TASK C (1 pt.): Ask your peer a question.
Your  Is that possible to see with our eyes that nuclear waste in today’s modern
Question world?

TASK D (2 pts.): Assess yourself.


Write 2 comments about your presentation  I had explained each point of my presentation section
that you thought was successful by giving with relevant examples and relevant images well.
justifications from the criteria. (1 pt.)  I had appropriate volume, intonation and speed

If given a second chance, what would you  If I given a one more chance, I would probably buy a
have done differently? (1 pt.) new laptop. Because my laptop was upset before my
presentation. It made me so depressed and anxious.
However, From my point of view, I didn’t give up, even
though everything was upset related with my internet
connection and my device. I thought and believed that,
not giving up would be perfect. Thank you god! It was
so like that 

This section is for course instructor use only.


TOTAL
TASK A TASK B TASK C TASK D
(2 pts.) POINTS:
(1 pt.) (1 pt.) (1 pt.)
(5 pts)

(!) Introductory info: information related to the presenter & assessor should be complete
& correct (0.25 pt. will be deducted from the total for each missing/incorrect information).

You might also like