Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scheinost 2009 - Use - and - Limitations - of - Second-Derivative - Diffuse - R
Scheinost 2009 - Use - and - Limitations - of - Second-Derivative - Diffuse - R
Scheinost 2009 - Use - and - Limitations - of - Second-Derivative - Diffuse - R
net/publication/230766077
CITATIONS READS
411 2,192
4 authors, including:
José Torrent
University of Cordoba (Spain)
283 PUBLICATIONS 14,658 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Vidal Barrón on 01 June 2014.
U S E A N D LIMITATIONS OF S E C O N D - D E R I V A T I V E D I F F U S E
R E F L E C T A N C E S P E C T R O S C O P Y IN T H E V I S I B L E TO
N E A R - I N F R A R E D R A N G E TO I D E N T I F Y A N D
Q U A N T I F Y Fe O X I D E M I N E R A L S IN SOILS
Abstract--We measured the visible to near-infrared (IR) spectra of 176 synthetic and natural samples of
Fe oxides, oxyhydroxides and an oxyhydroxysulfate (here collectively called "Fe oxides"), and of 56
soil samples ranging widely in goethite/hematite and goethite/lepidocrocite ratios. The positions of the
second-derivative minima, corresponding to crystal-field bands, varied substantially within each group of
the Fe oxide minerals. Because of overlapping band positions, goethite, maghemite and schwertmannite
could not be discriminated. Using the positions of the 4Tl<----6AI, 4T2<----6AI, (4E;4AI)4---6AI and the electron
pair transition (4T~h-4Ti)<----(6Ai q-6ml), at least 80% of the pure akaganeite, feroxyhite, ferrihydrite, hematite
and lepidocrocite samples could be correctly classified by discriminant functions. In soils containing
mixtures of Fe oxides, however, only hematite and magnetite could be unequivocally discriminated from
other Fe oxides. The characteristic features of hematite are the lower wavelengths of the 4"171transition
(848-906 nm) and the higher wavelengths of the electron pair transition (521-565 nm) as compared to
the other Fe oxides (909-1022 nm and 479-499 nm, resp.). Magnetite could be identified by a unique
band at 1500 nm due to Fe(II) to Fe(III) intervalence charge transfer. As the bands of goethite and hematite
are well separated, the goethite/hematite ratio of soils not containing other Fe oxides could be reasonably
predicted from the amplitude of the second-derivative bands. The detection limit of these 2 minerals in
soils was below 5 g kg t, which is about 1 order of magnitude lower than the detection limit for routine
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. This low detection limit, and the little time and effort involved in the
measurements, make second-derivative diffuse reflectance spectroscopy a practical means of routinely
determining goethite and hematite contents in soils. The identification of other accessory Fe oxide min-
erals in soils is, however, very restricted.
Key Words---Crystal Field Bands, Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy, Goethite, Hematite, Intervalence
Charge Transfer, Iron Oxides, Magnetite.
Table 1. References, origin (syn = synthetic, nat = natural), number (N) and A1 substitution (Ai-subst.) of the Fe oxide
samples.
A|-subst.
Fe oxide (abbreviation) Origin (N) (mole-fraction) References
Akaganeite (Akag) syn (7) 0 Bigham et al. (1990, 1996); Schwertmann et al. (1995)
Feroxyhyte (Feroxy) syn (5) 0 Carlson and Schwertmann (1980)
Ferrihydrite syn (11) 0 Schwertmann and Fischer (1973); Schwertmann et al. (1982);
(Ferrih) nat (11) Schwertmann and Kiimpf (1983); Carlson and Schwert-
mann (1981, 1987)
Goethite (Goeth) syn (25) 0-0.32 Schulze and Schwertmann (1984); Schwertmann et al.
nat (36) (1985)
Hematite (Hem) syn (26) 0-0.16 Stanjek (1991); Stanjek and Schwertmann (1992); Murad
nat (20) and Schwertmann (1986); Torrent and Schwertmann
(1987)
Lepidocrocite (Lepido) syn (14) 0-0.14 Schwertmann and Fitzpatrick (1977); Carlson and Schwert-
nat (3) mann (1990); Scbwertmann and Wolska (1990); Murad
and Schwertmann (1984)
Maghemite (Magh) nat (3) 0-0.7 Taylor and Schwertmann (1974)
Magnetite (Magn) syn (5) 0-0.17 Schwertmann and Murad (1990)
Schwertmannite (Schwt) syn (4) 0 Bigham et al. (1990, 1996); Schwertmann et al. (1995)
nat (6)
1100
1000 . . . . .
900 . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . . . .i . . . . . . . . i . . _ i . . J . . . . . . . ,a . . . . . . . .i . . . . . . . .
800
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . !. . . . . . . .
600
4-". 4 A 6A
400 _.,...i...=....,...I...:....z. ..... _z... ._.~... . . . ~
. . . . . q. . . . . . . q
300 I
"0
9 E s 9 m
~, t-
o = E
O
w.-
~
o E 9
-- f-
~o
Figure 1. Median and range of the crystal field band positions determined by second-derivative minima.
functions. The first and the second derivatives were the 3 single-electron transitions 4Tle---6AI, 4T2e--6A I and
calculated using a cubic spline fitting procedure (Press (4E;aA1)e'6A l, and the e l e c t r o n pair transition
et al. 1992). Briefly, a cubic spline consists of a num- (41", +4T~)e--(6A~ +6A~), in the following abbreviated by
ber o f cubic polynomial segments j o i n e d end to end " E P T " (Figure 1).
with continuity in first and second derivatives in the The EPT, as the most intense absorption band, de-
joints. A crucial input parameter in the program is the termines the position of the absorption edge which, in
n u m b e r of points taken for each segment, which de- turn, is closely related to the hue. The EPTs for the
termines the goodness of fitting (r 2) and the degree of hematites occur at 521 to 565 nm, clearly separated
smoothing of the curve. Several tests showed 15 to be from the EPTs of the other, m o r e yellowish Fe oxides
the o p t i m u m number of points to obtain smooth curves (479 to 499 nm) (Table 2). The difference in E P T and
with high r 2 values; therefore, this number was adopt- color between hematite and the other Fe oxides has
ed for the systematic calculation of the second-deriv- been explained by the presence o f face-sharing octa-
ative curves. The selected smoothing parameters are hedra in the hematite structure leading to an increase
not valid in general, but must be adjusted when the of the magnetic coupling between neighboring Fe(III)
spectra are taken with different scan parameters. centers (Sherman and Waite 1985). In contrast to the
results of Malengreau et al. (1994), however, the rang-
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
es of the E P T of all other Fe oxides generally over-
Discrimination between Single-Phase Fe Oxides lapped, that is, the discrimination o f these Fe oxides
The second-derivative spectra revealed 4 bands in could not be performed with the E P T only.
the range from 350 to 1050 nm. These bands were A similar separation of hematite f r o m the other Fe
assigned, according to Sherman and Waite (1985), to oxides is given by the 4Tle-'-6A I transition (Figure 1).
Vol. 46, No. 5, 1998 Use and limitations of 2nd-derivative diffuse reflectance spectroscopy 531
Table 3. Classification of Fe oxides by 4T~, 4T2, EPT and (4E; 4Al). Rows: observed classifications; columns: predicted
classifications.
Percent Ferrih Ferrih Hem Hem
correct Akag Feroxy - 4T2 + 4T2 Goeth + (E;A) - (E;A) Lepido Magh Schwt
Akaganeite 83 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Feroxyhite 100 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ferrihdyrite -4T2-~ 100 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ferrihdyrite +4T2-~ 100 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
Goethite 23 8 0 0 0 14 0 0 3 13 22
Hematite +(4E;4A07 100 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0
Hematite -(4E;aA~)t 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0
Lepidocrocite 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 3 0
Maghemite 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Schwertmannite 50 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 4
Total 66 14 5 16 6 16 21 22 18 18 27
t Ferrihydrite -4T2: ferrihydrite samples without the 4T2 band, Ferrihydrite +4T2: ferrihydrite samples with the 4T2 band.
Hematites resp. with and without the (4E;aA1) band.
532 Scheinost, Chavernas, Barr6n and Torrent Clays and Clay Minerals
Akag Feroxy Ferrih +4T2 Goeth Hem +(E;A) Lepid Magh Schwt
A set of classification functions to determine the Fe the m i n i m a depends on the goethite-to-hematite ratio
oxide mineralogy of further samples is given by: (see below).
Although lepidocrocite and goethite could be dis-
Sx = ax. 4T2 + b x . E P T + c . , . ( 4 E ; 4A1) + dx. aTl -b e~
criminated in pure phases (Table 2), the derivative
[1]
spectra of soils containing both Fe oxides did not re-
with the scores for each group o f minerals, Sx, and the solve the slightly different band positions (Figure 3).
coefficients for each group, ax, b~, cx, d~ and ex as Using the classification functions given in Table 4,
defined in Table 4. Within the limitations shown be- soils with l e p i d o c r o c i t e / ( l e p i d o c r o c i t e + g o e t h i t e )
fore, the highest number of Sx gives the Fe oxide min- ~ 0 . 3 7 were classified as lepidocrocites, while those
eral o f the e x a m i n e d sample. As second-derivative with a ratio -<0.37 were classified as goethite or mag-
spectra without a m i n i m u m in the 4T2<---6A 1 range un- hemite. In the same way, the derivative spectra of fer-
equivocally indicated ferribydrite, and those without a rihydrite/goethite and ferrihydrite/lepidocrocite
m i n i m u m in the ( h E ; h A 1)<---6A 1 range unequivocally in- mixtures did not resolve the bands of both phases (data
dicated hematite, no classification functions are nec- not shown). That is, second-derivative spectroscopy is
essary for these subgroups. As the band positions de- not suited to detect small amounts o f ferrihydrite or
rived from the second derivatives depend on the x and lepidocrocite in addition to a major goethite p h a s e - - a
y units of the spectra, and on the smoothing of the situation which should frequently occur in soils due to
spectra, it is indispensable to follow the procedure giv- t h e r m o d y n a m i c inequilibria (Cornell and Schwert-
en under Materials and Methods before calculating the mann 1996). A l t h o u g h not tested experimentally, it
scores. may be concluded that spectra o f other combinations
of Fe oxides with band positions in the same or strong-
Identification of Mixtures o f Fe Oxides ly overlapping regions w o u l d not allow the single con-
Because o f the well-separated EPTs of goethite and tributions to be resolved, either.
hematite, both phases are clearly detectable from the Besides the band wavelengths, absolute and relative
derivative spectra o f soils (Figure 2). The intensity of band intensities and bandwidths m a y be used to dis-
4e-6 2e-6
~ lepid/(lepid+goeth)
I.~ ~ 1.00
le-6 ll~ m- 0.72
UJ
--> 2e-6 / ~ hematite/(hematite+oo~
~ .~ A gt ~ --- 0.37
,~ -- 0.00
o"'
Y0,,j
~- o.1
-2e-6 0,0
goethite EPThematite
-4e-6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -2e-6
450 500 550 600 400 500 600 700 800 900 I000
100
m-
80
ua 5
>
IJJ
O
Y
z 60
-->
tr 0
0 lit
UJ
CI
--J
u. 4o
w
I1: A
t r
20 -10
9 . , . . . . , . . . . , . . . . , . . .
WAVELENGTH (nm)
500 1000 1500 2000
Figure 6. Position and amplitude of the bands selected for
WAVELENGTH / nm the quantification of goethite (YI) and hematite (Y2) in soil
samples.
Figure 4. Reflectance spectra of pure magnetite, magnetite
+ maghemite and soils with various concentrations of mag-
netite.
criminate Fe oxides. Although such differences were
evident with synthetic, single-phase samples, for ex-
ample, sharper bands for goethite than for ferrihydrite,
these differences were generally less expressed for nat-
ural Fe oxides, and could not be used to differentiate
'l/,+~/ a
10 the origin of overlapping bands in mixtures and soils.
Band amplitudes of the second-derivative spectra were
higher for hematite, but no significant differences were
found between the amplitudes of the other Fe oxides.
The reflectance of the magnetite samples was very
low and, because of that, the spectra were too noisy
>o
to allow for the determination of their crystal field
bands. This low reflectivity is caused by a strong ab-
-10
40O 420
2:,2
44O
WAVELENGTH (rim)
460 480 5O0
sorption band which has its maximum in the near-IR
at about 1500 nm, but extends across the visible range
(Figure 4). It is caused by the presence of Fe(II) and
Fe(III) in neighboring octahedra in the magnetite
structure, leading to the delocalization of electrons due
to intervalence charge transfer (IVCT) (Sherman and
Waite 1985; Burns 1981). Strens and Wood (1979) de-
termined the position of the IVTC of magnetite from
~,, b
diffuse reflectance spectra at 1400 nm, and Sherman
5 I% (1987) derived an energy of 1475 nm from molecular
orbital calculations assuming equal sites for Fe(II) and
Fe(III) (q = 0). Both values correspond with ours, con-
z.o sidering the low precision with which the position of
such broad bands could be determined. The shape of
this IVCT band is more pronounced in samples of
maghemite-magnetite mixtures, or in soils containing
magnetite, because of the generally higher reflectivity
of these samples (Figure 4). Even trace amounts of
-10
540 560 580 600 820 640 magnetite are detectable.
WAVELENGTH (nm)
Quantification of Hematite and Goethite in Soils
Figure 5. Second-derivative spectra of the remission func-
tion f(R) in selected spectrum bands for mixtures of a defer- The well-separated EPTs of goethite and hematite
rated soil material with different quantities of (a) goethite and allow one to identify very small amounts of goethite
(b) hematite. and hematite. Figure 5 shows selected parts of the sec-
534 Scheinost, Chavernas, Barr6n and Torrent Clays and Clay Minerals
§ CONCLUSIONS
0.6
M o d e r n s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t e r s allow the fast acquisi-
tion o f reflectance spectra (typically less than 10 min,
tu
"r" 0.4 only a few s e c o n d s with n e w diode array detectors),
and calculations of derivatives and band amplitudes
0.2
c a n b e d o n e easily w i t h the a p p r o p r i a t e software. In
"I"
addition, s a m p l e p r e p a r a t i o n for s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t r i c
0 m e a s u r e m e n t s is fast ( < 5 m i n ) a n d n o n d e s t r u c t i v e .
' .6 T h e s e a d v a n t a g e s m a k e s e c o n d - d e r i v a t i v e diffuse re-
0 0.2 0,4 0 0.8
flectance s p e c t r o s c o p y well suited for routine mea-
Y~(Y2+Y1) s u r e m e n t s o f goethite a n d h e m a t i t e in soils a n d m i n -
Figure 7. The relationship between the hematite/(hematite eral mixtures. W i t h the e x c e p t i o n o f h e m a t i t e a n d
+ goethite) ratio as determined by differential XRD, and the magnetite, however, the u n e q u i v o c a l d i s c r i m i n a t i o n o f
112/(I"1 + Y2) ratio as determined by diffuse reflectance spec- Fe o x i d e m i n e r a l s c a n n o t b e p e r f o r m e d b y u s i n g the
troscopy (see Figure 6 for explanation of Yj and 112). positions o f the crystal field b a n d s only. A b e t t e r result
m a y b e a c h i e v e d b y i n c l u d i n g the v i b r a t i o n a l b a n d s
into the d i s c r i m i n a n t analysis ( C o y n e et al. 1990; B i s h -
o n d - d e r i v a t i v e c u r v e o f the reflectivity f u n c t i o n for op et al. 1995; B i s h o p a n d M u r a d 1996).
m i x t u r e s o f a d e f e r r a t e d soil m a t r i x (treated with ci-
t r a t e / b i c a r b o n a t e / d i t h i o n i t e to r e m o v e Fe oxides) a n d ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
s y n t h e t i c h e m a t i t e a n d goethite; c o n c e n t r a t i o n s as low
as 0.5 g k g - t p r o d u c e a significant c h a n g e in the curve. ACS acknowledges the research grant by the Deutsche For-
schungsgemeinschaft, and thanks D. G. Schulze (Purdue Uni-
In Vertisol s a m p l e s c o n t a i n i n g only goethite as F e ox-
versity) who gave the visiting scientist a warm welcome and
ide, the d e t e c t i o n limit for this m i n e r a l was a b o u t 3 g provided the equipment, R. V. Morris (NASA, Houston, Tex-
k g -~ (results not s h o w n ) . In s u m m a r y , the detection as) for his introduction into the secrets of diffuse reflectance
limit s e e m s to b e at least 1 o r d e r o f m a g n i t u d e smaller spectroscopy and U. Schwertmann (Technische Universit~it
t h a n that o f o r d i n a r y X R D . Mtinchen, Germany) who generously provided his large col-
lection of Fe oxides.
To o b t a i n an i n d e x o f the b a n d intensity in the sec-
o n d - d e r i v a t i v e c u r v e s for goethite a n d hematite, we REFERENCES
u s e d the a m p l i t u d e b e t w e e n the - 4 1 5 - n m m i n i m u m
((4E;aAI)~---6At) a n d the - - 4 4 5 - n m m a x i m u m for goe- Barr6n V, Torrent J. 1986. Use of the Kubelka-Munk theory
thite ( d e n o t e d as Y1), a n d b e t w e e n the - - 5 3 5 - n m m i n - to study the influence of iron oxides on soil colour. J Soil
Sci 37:499-510.
i m u m (EPT) a n d the - 5 8 0 - n m m a x i m u m for h e m a t i t e Bigham JM, Schwertmann U, Carlson L, Murad E. 1990. A
( d e n o t e d as I12) (Figure 6). F o r the 4 0 soils used, w h i c h poorly crystallized oxyhydroxysulfate of iron formed by
g e n e r a l l y c o n t a i n e d less t h a n 150 g k g -~ h e m a t i t e a n d bacterial oxidation of Fe(II) in acid mine waters. Geochim
goethite, a h i g h l y significant c o r r e l a t i o n was f o u n d be- Cosmochim Acta 54:2743-2758.
Bigham JM, Schwertmann U, Pfab G. 1996. Influence of pH
t w e e n g o e t h i t e c o n t e n t a n d Y~ ( G o e t h i t e [g kg -~] =
on mineral speciation in a bioreactor simulating acid mine
- 0 . 0 6 + 268111; r 2 = 0.86; P < 0.001), a n d h e m a t i t e drainage. Appl Geochem 11:845-852.
c o n t e n t a n d I12 ( H e m a t i t e [g k g ~] = - 0 . 0 9 + 402Y2; Bishop JL, Murad E. 1996. Schwertmannite on Mars? Spec-
r: = 0.85; P < 0.001). M u l t i p l e r e g r e s s i o n u s i n g b o t h troscopic analyses of schwertmannite, its relationship to
a m p l i t u d e s did not i m p r o v e the c o r r e l a t i o n coefficient. other ferric minerals, and its possible presence in the sur-
face material on Mars. In: Dyar MD, McCammon C,
F o r the s a m e soils, the r e d n e s s rating, (ROE), p r o p o s e d Schaefer MW, editors. Mineral spectroscopy: A tribute to
b y B a r r 6 n a n d Torrent (1986) p r o v i d e d a h i g h e r cor- Roger G. Burns. Spec Publ: Geochem Soc.
r e l a t i o n with the h e m a t i t e c o n t e n t (r 2 = 0.94). H o w - Bishop JL, Pieters CM, Burns RG," Edwards JO, Mancinelli
ever, the p r o c e d u r e s b a s e d on the s e c o n d - d e r i v a t i v e RL, Froeschl H. 1995. Reflectance spectroscopy of ferric
sulfate-bearing montmorillonites as Mars soil analog ma-
c u r v e h a v e the a d v a n t a g e o v e r r e d n e s s ratings in that
terials. Icarus 117:101-119.
they help s i m u l t a n e o u s l y predict h e m a t i t e a n d goethite Burns RG. 1981. Intervalence transitions in mixed-valence
contents. In practice, o n e c a n use the r e l a t i o n s h i p be- minerals of iron and titanium. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 9:
t w e e n the h e m a t i t e / ( h e m a t i t e + goethite) ratio (derived 345-383.
f r o m X - r a y or differential X R D m e a s u r e m e n t s ) and Burns RG. 1993. Mineralogical applications of crystal field
theory. Cambridge topics in mineral physics and chemistry,
the Y2/(Y~ + }'2) a m p l i t u d e ratio for that p u r p o s e (Fig- 5. Cambridge Univ Pr. 551 p.
ure 7). T h e a b s o l u t e quantities o f h e m a t i t e a n d g o e t h i t e Carlson L, Schwertmann U. 1980. Natural occurrence of fer-
are c a l c u l a t e d f r o m the p r e d i c t e d h e m a t i t e / ( h e m a t i t e + oxyhite (~-FeOOH). Clays Clay Miner 28:272-280.
Vol. 46, No. 5, 1998 U s e and limitations of 2nd-derivative diffuse reflectance spectroscopy 535
Torrent J, Schwertmann U. 1987. Influence of hematite on the Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. 1982. Color science: Concepts and
color of red beds. J Sediment Petrol 57:682-686. methods, quantitative data and formulae. New York: J. Wi-
Torrent J, Schwertmann U, Schulze DG. 1980. Iron oxide ley. 950 p.
mineralogy of some soils of two river terrace sequences in (Received 28 August 1997; accepted 23 January 1998; Ms.
Spain. Geoderma 23:191-208. 97-084)