Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8245
8245
8245
Contents
Page
1. Introduction to Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification
1.1 Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification Core Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Wales, Europe and the World, including the Language Module Work related Education including work experience and an enterprise activity Personal and Social education, including Community Participation Individual Investigation Welsh Baccalaureate Options GCSE/A Level Vocational Qualifications Principal Learning & Project
1.2
2. 3. 4.
Structure and Aims of Principal Learning in Engineering (Wales) Unit Format Assessment and Grading of Principal Learning
Internal Assessment External Assessment Calculation of Principal Learning Grades
5 6 8
5.
11
6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Unit Specifications Access & Recruitment Further Information
Useful Publications
1.1
The components of the Core are: Essential Skills Wales (ESW) and Wider Key Skills (WKS). These skills are embedded in each candidates programme, by design in the Core components and within specific ESW and Wider Key Skills programmes, and through careful signposting in the Options, leading to assessment opportunities. Wales, Europe and the World (WEW), in which the focus is on political, economic, social and cultural issues and sets them in the context of Wales, Europe (including the UK) and the world. This component includes a Language Module. Work-related Education (WRE), which enhances understanding of the world of work, the importance of enterprise and entrepreneurship and contributes to Careers Education and Guidance (CEG). There is a requirement that all candidates will work with an employer and contribute to a team enterprise activity. Personal and Social Education (PSE), which includes equal opportunities, social inclusion, and sustainable development and will promote active citizenship and good health. There is a community participation element for all candidates. The Individual Investigation provides an opportunity for candidates to investigate an area of interest in more detail. The issue investigated may relate to the WBQ Core or candidates Options. Through undertaking the investigation, candidates can develop their skills of enquiry, creative thinking, reasoning, information processing, presentation and evaluation.
1.2
The Option elements can be satisfied through a range of choices at the required level as demonstrated in the following:
Options
A maximum of three qualifications at Level 3 which total: 720 GLH or 108 credits or 100% of the Level 3 threshold or Principal Learning (Level 3) 50% as a minimum must be applied learning. Principal learning: (a) is sector related, focusing on developing and applying knowledge and skills relevant to the sector; will place an emphasis on learning by doing and include 270GLH that is concerned with the application of knowledge and skills through relevant work and work-related tasks. will, as appropriate to line of learning and level, provide opportunities to generate evidence to enable the required key skills in the core to be assessed. and Extended Project Qualification (Level 3). Note: Extended Project Qualification Candidates choosing qualifications other than Principal Learning may also choose the project qualification.
2.
3.
(b)
(c)
ii) 30 hours of a 'Team Enterprise Activity'. iii) Personal and Social Education (PSE) - 30 hours and 30 hours of 'Community Participation'. iv) Work-related Education (WRE) - 30 hours of 'Working with an Employer'
Further information about the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification can be found on the Welsh Baccalaureate web site: http://www.wbq.org.uk/home
WJEC/Edexcel Level 3 Principal Learning in Engineering (Wales) All units are compulsory. Unit number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Title Investigating Engineering Business and the Environment (Wales) Applications of Computer Aided Designing (Wales) Selection and Application of Engineering Materials (Wales) Instrumentation and Control Engineering (Wales) Maintaining Engineering Plant, Equipment and Systems (Wales) Investigating Modern Manufacturing Techniques Used in Engineering (Wales) Innovative Design and Enterprise (Wales) Mathematical Techniques and Applications for Engineers (Wales) Principles and Application of Engineering Science (Wales) GLH 60 60 60 60 30 60 60 60 90 Assessment External Internal Internal Internal Internal Internal Internal External Internal
UNIT FORMAT
All units in WJEC/Edexcel Principal Learning qualifications have a standard format which is designed to provide clear guidance on the requirements of the qualification for learners, tutors, assessors and those responsible for monitoring national standards. Each unit is set out in the following way: Unit title The unit title is accredited by QCA and this form of words will appear on the learners Notification of Performance (NOP). This is the level of study of the qualification as determined by Level the Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF). Internal/external Further details of the mode of assessment are given later in the unit. assessment Guided learning In the Principal Learning qualifications each unit consists of 30, 60 or 90 guided learning hours depending on the level. hours (GLH) Guided learning hours are a notional measure of the substance of a unit. It includes an estimate of time that might be allocated to direct teaching, instruction and assessment, together with other structured learning time such as directed assignments or supported individual study. It excludes learnerinitiated private study. Centres are advised to consider this definition when planning the programme of study associated with this specification. This section is designed to give the reader an appreciation of About this unit the value of the unit in the vocational setting of the qualification as well as highlighting the focus of the unit. It provides the reader with a snapshot of the aims of the unit and the key knowledge, skills and understanding developed while studying the unit. The unit abstract also emphasises links to the sector by describing what the unit offers the sector. Learning outcomes state exactly what a learner should know, Learning understand or be able to do as a result of completing the outcomes unit. This section identifies the depth and breadth of knowledge, What you need skills and understanding needed to achieve each of the to cover learning outcomes. This is illustrated by the range of subject material for the programme of learning and specifies the skills, knowledge and understanding required for achievement to the level required to comply with all mark bands. Each learning outcome is stated in full and then expanded with further detail on the right-hand side. Internally assessed units may contain e.g.s within this section. These are used to show indicative lists of content only. This unit will be presented on the National Database of QCF unit Accredited Qualifications, NDAQ, which uses the format summary presented here. This section outlines the intermediary stage in generating the marking grid from the learning outcomes via assessment criteria. How you will be assessed This section gives information about the assessment activities required for this unit.
Marking grid
Internally assessed units have a marking grid which contains a list of assessment foci, with statements ordered into three mark bands. When work is marked it is judged against these statements and an appropriate mark awarded. This section is designed to give tutors additional guidance and amplification on the unit in order to provide a coherence of understanding and a consistency of delivery and assessment. This section includes guidance on: Delivery this could, for example, explain the relationship between the content and the learning outcomes or guidance about possible approaches to delivery. Assessment this could provide amplification about the nature and type of evidence that learners need to produce in order to pass the unit or achieve the higher marks. This section should be read in conjunction with the marking grid. This section will also provide guidance relating to Work experience, Specialist resources and Reference materials.
Internal assessment
Internal assessment will be used to facilitate assessment of generic and practical skills. It will be quality assured through internal and external moderation. It will be supervised and completed under controlled conditions. Each unit is assessed through a single assignment which has an overall purpose that reflects the aim of the unit, and is described in the How you will be assessed section. An assignment may be broken down into a few separate tasks. Tasks may be further broken down into smaller activities. The Internal Assessment of Principal Learning Units: Controls for Task Setting and Task Taking document details the nature of the controls that need to be applied to each type of task/activity and its outcome. Where a unit is internally assessed, centres can use the sample assignments provided by WJEC/Edexcel, or can design and quality assure suitable assignments. When designing assignments, centres are required to be aware of the following design principles (see relevant tutor support materials for further guidance). Assignments should be: Fit for purpose They should consist of tasks which are related to the subject matter and content of the unit. For example, where a unit is centred on IT, the assessment will use IT at the core of the task. They should be designed to be manageable for both the learner and for the centre. They should be delivered under controlled conditions, where centres can guarantee the work produced is truly that of the individual learner. They should produce judgements of a similar standard from occasion to occasion and between different assessors. They should assess what they are intended to assess in terms of the learning outcomes. They should be expressed in ways that can be readily understood by learners, tutors and assessors. They should fairly reflect the content and associated learning outcomes, avoiding confusing learning with assessment and not adversely affecting teaching and learning. They should provide opportunities for learners to produce a variety of different forms of evidence.
Manageable Secure
Flexible
Centres are encouraged to use a variety of assessment methods, which might include, for example, the use of case studies, work-based assessments, projects, performance observation and time-constrained assessments. Centres are encouraged to place emphasis on practical application, providing a realistic scenario for learners to adopt, and making maximum use of practical activities and work experience. The creation of assignments that are fit for purpose is vital to learners achievement and its importance cannot be over emphasised. When reading the marking grids and designing assignments, centres should note the following. Each internally assessed unit has 60 available marks in total. In some units the marking grid has been split into two grids A and B. Marking grid A contains all of the marking criteria for the unit except those which assess a learners performance in practical activities which are recorded as a witness testimony or observation record. These make up grid B. Centres must ensure that learners undertake appropriate assessment tasks to enable them to achieve the requirements of each units marking grid(s). The basic principle is that this is a best fit grid i.e. the assessor must match the overall standard of work for an assessment focus to a band. It is NOT a hurdle approach, whereby the assessor cannot award marks from the next mark band if one item for an assessment focus from a lower mark band has been omitted, regardless of the quality of the rest of the work for that assessment focus. If a learner completes all they are asked to do in a band for an assessment focus, they can be awarded the full marks for that mark band. If a learner has clearly done more on one aspect of work for an assessment focus required by a mark band, the assessor should consider whether the learner can be awarded marks from the bottom of the next mark band. If a learner has completed less than required in any aspect of work for an assessment focus, or indeed omitted an aspect, then the mark moves down within the mark band. Marking is completely separate for each assessment focus i.e. a learner can get mark band 3 on one assessment focus, mark band 1 on another etc, then all marks are added together for the unit total. It may be possible, depending on weighting of an assessment focus for a learner to pass a unit even if 0 has been given in marks for one assessment focus in the unit. A 0 mark should be used only where a learner provides no valid evidence. Any work that starts to address the requirements of the grid should normally be awarded at least one mark. Evidence generated for marking grid A will be moderated. This must be in the form of hard evidence which a moderator can reassess, such as learner produced written documents (e.g. short question answers, multiple choice question answers, materials from presentations, research notes), videos (dated) of practical activities or artefacts. Marks gained from marking grid A will be reported separately from those gained from marking grid B.
External assessment
There is a requirement that some units in the Principal Learning will be externally assessed. These external assessments will be made available by WJEC/Edexcel on agreed, published dates during the year. For the Principal Learning in Engineering (Wales) the following units will be externally assessed at Level 3: Level Advanced (Level 3) Unit number(s) Unit 1 Unit 8 Unit title(s) Investigating Engineering Business and the Environment (Wales) Mathematical Techniques and Applications for Engineers (Wales)
Mode of study
WJEC/Edexcel do not define the mode of study for the Principal Learning but there is an explicit requirement that for at least 50 per cent of the time learners will be engaged in applied learning.
Applied learning
Acquiring and applying knowledge, skills and understanding through tasks set in sector contexts that have many of the characteristics of real work, or are set within the workplace. Most importantly, the purpose of the task in which learners apply their knowledge, skills and understanding must be relevant to real work in the sector. Reference: The Diploma (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 2007) Centres are free to offer the qualifications using any mode of delivery that meets the needs of their learners and the requirements of applied learning. For example this may be through a combination of traditional classroom teaching, open learning and distance learning. Whatever mode of delivery is used, centres must ensure that learners have appropriate access to the required resources (see individual units) and to the subject specialists delivering the units. Assignments based on the work environment should be encouraged. Those planning the programme should aim to enhance the vocational nature of the Principal Learning by: liaising with employers to ensure a course relevant to the specific needs of the learners accessing and using non-confidential data and documents from workplaces including sponsoring employers in the delivery of the programme and, where appropriate, in the assessment linking with company-based/workplace training programmes making full use of the variety of experience of work and life that learners bring to the programme.
Delivery of applied learning It is important that centres develop an approach to teaching and learning that supports the applied learning requirement of the qualification. The Principal Learning specifications contain a balance of practical skill development and knowledge requirements, some of which can be theoretical in nature. Tutors and assessors need to ensure that appropriate links are made between theory and practice and that the knowledge base is applied to the sector. This will require the development of relevant and up-to-date teaching materials that allow learners to apply their learning to actual events and activity within the sector. Tutors are reminded that experiential learning techniques are required and that the opportunities for formative assessment where learners benefit from regular and structured feedback are a necessary requirement of a Principal Learning programme. Where learners are performing an activity by practically applying their knowledge and skills, they are essentially behaving in the required applied nature of the qualification. By then reviewing that learning and considering how improvements can be made and implemented, experiential learning will take place (see Figure 1).
Do Experiential learning
Review
Plan
Figure 1: Experiential learning cycle Resources One aim of the qualification is to prepare learners to progress to employment in specific sectors. Physical resources need to support the delivery of the programme and the proper assessment of the learning outcomes and therefore should normally be of industry standard. Staff delivering programmes and conducting the assessments should be fully familiar with current practice and standards in the sector concerned. Centres will need to meet any specialist resource requirements when they seek approval from the Welsh Assembly Government (DCELLS).
Assessment and learning Summative assessment Summative assessment serves to inform an overall judgement of achievement, which may be needed for reporting and review, perhaps on transfer between years in a school or on transfer between schools, perhaps for providing certificates at the end of schooling. Although learners are working to satisfy a summative assessment (the marking grids reflect a final overall judgement) the benefit of formative assessment should be strongly emphasised throughout the learning. Formative assessment Formative assessment is concerned with the short-term collection and use of evidence as guidance of learning, mainly in day-to-day classroom practice.
6.
UNIT SPECIFICATIONS
WJEC/Edexcel Level 3
Principal Learning in Engineering (Wales)
Learning outcomes
On completion of this unit, a learner should: LO.1. Know how an engineering business is structured and how it operates. LO.2. Know about internal and external factors that affect the way in which an engineering business operates. LO.3. Know about and apply financial and planning concepts, and costing and planning techniques. LO.4. Know the importance of legislation concerning health and safety including a risk assessment for an engineering activity.
LO.2
Know about internal and external factors that affect the way in which an engineering business operates
LO.3
Know about and apply financial and planning concepts, and costing and planning techniques
Learners will need to find out about basic financial concepts, e.g. income, expenditure, profit/loss, indirect cost, fixed cost, variable cost, contribution, marginal costing; assets, e.g. investment, value and depreciation of fixed assets. Learners will need to apply costing techniques to determine the cost effectiveness of an engineering activity, e.g. job costing, process costing, absorption costing, make or buy decisions, break-even point, investment appraisal. Learners will investigate basic planning concepts, e.g. short-term and long-term plans, standing plans, business plans, financial plans, budget plans, charts and scheduling techniques (flow charts, Gantt charts, critical path methods, software packages), setting priorities, monitoring and resource control. Learners will also apply planning techniques to determine the feasibility and critical path for a time constrained engineering activity, e.g. the design, manufacture, installation and commissioning of an engineered product. Learners will need to find out about the legislation and regulations that relate to an engineering business, e.g. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, Employment Act 2002, Factories Act 1961, Fire Precautions Act 1971; regulations, e.g. The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, Provision and use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations (COSHH) 2002, Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998, Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992, Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992, Confined Spaces Regulations 1997, Electricity at Work Regulations 1989, Noise at Work Regulations 1989, reportable Injuries Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1998, Working Time Regulations 1998,The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1981, Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005, reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations (RIDDOR) 1995, Working Time Regulations 1998, Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1981, Supply of Machinery (Safety) (Amendment) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/831). Learners will need to know about the roles and responsibilities of individuals and bodies involved with health and safety, e.g. employers; employees; Health and Safety Executive (HSE), e.g. span of authority, right of inspection, guidance notes and booklets; others, e.g. management, sub-contractors, public, suppliers, customers, visitors. Learners will also research the use of control measures in relation to health and safety, e.g. removal of need (design out), use of recognised procedures, substances control, guarding, lifting assessments and manual handling assessments, regular inspection, use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), training of personnel, other personal procedures for health, safety and welfare. Learners will carry out a risk assessment for an engineering activity, e.g. use of a lathe to remove metal, use of soldering equipment to make soldered joints on an electronic circuit board.
LO.4
Know the importance of legislation concerning health and safety including a risk assessment for an engineering activity
LO.2
Know about internal and external factors that affect the way in which an engineering business operates
LO.3
Know about and apply financial and planning concepts, and costing and planning techniques
LO.4
Know the importance of legislation concerning health and safety including a risk assessment for an engineering activity
Centres will need to carefully consider when this unit is to be delivered within the programme of learning. To be truly effective, the unit requires learners to have an appreciation of the core aspects of the engineering processes being studied (e.g. manufacturing/production processes) and the language of engineering. This is because they will be exposed to these concepts very quickly as they begin to examine the functions of engineering companies. The external assessment is in the form of an examination which has three sections. The examination paper is made up of 20 multiple-choice questions, about four short-answer questions and about two long-answer questions. All questions are marked against a marking scheme.
Guidance for Integrating Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Level 3
Skills in applied learning A unique and central feature of Principal Learning (PL) is the requirement that at least 50% must be completed in an applied or work-related context. This means that learners must actively engage with the curriculum they are studying, putting theory into practice and working cooperatively with other learners, with their teachers, and with people from outside the classroom. They should learn in a range of contexts and environments, carrying out investigations and active enquiries, learning through doing and relating their learning to job roles. The skills embodied in the three Essential Skills Wales (ESW) and the three wider key skills (WKS) are therefore integral to the delivery of Principal Learning (PL) at all levels and in all lines of learning. Principal Learning offers many opportunities to develop all six skills (ESW + WKS) that are required if a candidate is to achieve the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ). To achieve the WBQ at Advanced level, learners must achieve three of the six skills at Level 3, one of which must be ESW Communication, Application of Number or ICT, together with the other three skills at Level 2 Developing skills The table below lists, in the first column, the skills that a learner must develop for the ESW or WKS in question. The second column suggests a PL context in which the skill would arise naturally and might be developed. It is important that, when developing an ESW skill, both the learner and the teacher pay close attention to the section in the standards headed In order to show that you are competent. Similarly for the WKS, teachers and learners must study Part A. The third column in the table identifies the ESW or WKS component. Portfolio evidence If a learner is aiming to generate portfolio evidence in the context of a learning activity or assignment in PL, it is important to ensure that the requirements of the assignment match the evidence requirements of the skill qualification (ESW or WKS) in question, in terms of content and of presentation. A portfolio of evidence will often require more than one example of the skill, so teachers will need to identify other contexts and opportunities from the many that exist in the context of the WBQ as a whole. The table below does not include details of these requirements. It is therefore essential that teachers are familiar with: the standards for ESW and the associated documents Amplification of Evidence Requirements (which includes guidance), and Mandatory Definitions, which are available from http://old.accac.org.uk/eng/content.php?mID=752 the standards for the wider key skills and the associated document The key skills qualifications and guidance: working with others, improving own learning and performance and problem solving levels 1-4 2004 (QCA 2004); order ref QCA/04/1294, downloadable from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_6462.aspx .
It is important to emphasise that candidates may develop these skills and/or generate portfolio evidence from anywhere in their learning programme. It is therefore not necessary, nor expected, that any one unit of Principal Learning should offer development and/or evidence opportunities for all the components of each of the six skills. Where opportunities to develop these skills and to provide portfolio evidence arise naturally in learning contexts, they should be pursued; learning and assignments should not be distorted to include the skills where they do not arise naturally. Essential Skills Wales Communication The ESW standards aim to integrate the different aspects of communication (speaking and listening, reading and writing) and emphasise that communication should be purposeful. So, for example, the purpose of reading might be to inform discussion and/or writing, or a discussion might be part of a candidates preparation for a piece of writing, all in relation to the purpose of the Principal Learning unit. Application of Number The ESW standards emphasise that numbers must be applied and used for the purpose of tackling a problem or task. At Level 3, the standards are structured round the following process: Understand and tackle a problem Collect and interpret data Carry out calculations Check results Interpret results findings Reflect/review. Present
The problem should arise naturally in the context of the candidates work for the Principal Learning unit. For portfolio evidence at this level, the candidate must carry out at least one activity that shows their skills in the process as a whole, ie covering all three components of the unit. ICT As with Application of Number, the ESW standards emphasise the importance of using ICT in context and for a purpose. The Amplification of evidence requirements specifically states that You must demonstrate your ICT skills in the context of these activities; demonstrating your skills in isolation cannot be used as evidence. Also similarly to Application of Number, the learner, while developing their ICT skills, is likely to focus on parts of the process and on specific skills, but they should always have the big picture in mind and build towards seeing the process as a whole. For the portfolio, the Amplification states that: You must carry out at least two activities that, overall: show that you can plan and carry through a number of different activities, one of which must be a complex activity covering ICT3.1, ICT3.2 and ICT3.3. While much of the portfolio evidence may be presented electronically and/or as printouts, it is essential that it shows the processes the candidate used to confirm their understanding of their task, to select, enter and develop information, and to present their work. This will normally involve drafting, revising, correcting, redrafting or reformatting the work. This is therefore an important aspect of developing ESW ICT, and the evidence submitted for assessment must include at least one complete draft with notes, annotations, highlighting, alterations etc. The final printouts, presentations etc are not, on their own, sufficient as evidence, though they must be included in the portfolio.
The wider key skills All three of the wider key skills require the candidate to learn and to demonstrate the process skills of: Planning Doing Reviewing.
Each component of this process can be learned and developed separately, though portfolio evidence must cover all three components of the qualification in a single activity. Working with Others at Level 3 requires that the example in the portfolio shows that the learner can work as part of a group or team made up of at least three people (i.e. the learner works with at least two other people). The learner must become conscious of and focus on their own skills and how they relate to others if they are to develop their ability to contribute effectively to a team project or activity. They must be able to review their work with others, identify factors that influenced the outcome and agree how to improve their teamworking skills for the future. The evidence in a candidates portfolio must show their individual contribution to the work of the group. Problem Solving is a skill that many younger learners do not at first recognise as a skill that, like other skills, involves learning and developing specialised techniques. The learner has to identify and analyse a problem (which must be individual to them, not a group activity), come up with different ways of tackling it and choose one, make a plan, follow it, and check whether the problem has been solved. They must then review their approach to problem solving. As with Working with Others, each phase can be focused on separately in the learning and development phase, but the portfolio requires two examples, each of which follows though all three components of the qualification. Improving Own Learning and Performance, like the other wider key skills, requires the learner to become consciously aware of how they learn and which ways of learning are most effective for them in different situations. Many learners will have used only one or two ways of learning hitherto and need to be introduced to other possibilities. They must take responsibility for improving their learning and performance, set targets for what they want to learn or do, make a plan with targets, follow the plan, reflect on and review their progress, establish what they have achieved, and agree ways to further improve their performance. Any of the learning outcomes in the Principal Learning unit could provide opportunities to develop IOLP skills, but SMART targets must be set that relate to the purpose of the unit. The portfolio of evidence must include at least one example that covers at least three targets. Overall, the evidence must show at least two different ways of learning.
Suggested context
Speaking to communicate
C3.1.2
information feelings opinions questions complex instructions on a range of familiar and unfamiliar topics, using appropriate language and non-verbal communication, and in a range of contexts.
(a) Taking part in formal discussions with two or more other people (b) Giving a talk/presentation of at least eight minutes.
C3.1.3
Reading
Reading, understanding and synthesising information from at least two documents about the same subject. Research information from two legislative documents to find out about how legislation might relate to an engineering business (e.g., Health & Safety at Work Act and the PPE at work regulations. Synthesis this information to inform a report.
C3.2 C3.2.1
Each document must be at least 1,000 words long. At least one must contain complex information or reasoning and at least one must contain an image Writing
Writing two documents of different types, each one giving different information to different audiences about complex subjects in appropriate formats and using language that is appropriate to purpose and audience. One document must be at least 1,000 words long.
C3.3 C3.3.1
Produce a report about legislation and its affect on an engineering business. Produce an evaluative document concerning the cost effectiveness of an engineering activity,
Suggested context
ICT3.1.2 ICT3.1.3
Following safe, healthy and secure working practices at all times. Finding, selecting and exchanging information Planning how to find the ICT-based and non ICT-based information required. Searching for, evaluating, selecting and getting, from a range of sources, relevant ICT-based and non ICTbased information. Entering, saving, communicating and exchanging ICT-based information to suit the purpose. Developing and presenting information Organising, developing, formatting and combining ICT-based and non ICT-based information from different sources to suit content and purpose, in the form of: a) text b) tables c) images d) numbers e) records. Presenting the final output effectively, using a consistent style and formats and layouts that are appropriate to purpose and audience, using ICT, and reviewing the work.
Use ICT to present combined, organised and formatted ICT and non ICT information, including text, tables, images numbers and records in comparative document concerning the different sectors in which engineering companies operate. Review work. Plan, search for, select and evaluate ICT based and non ICT based sources concerning the different sectors in which engineering companies operate. Enter, save, communicate and exchange the information to inform a document.
ICT3.2 ICT3.2.1
ICT3.1.2
ICT3.1.3
ICT3.3 ICT3.3.1
ICT3.3.2
Suggested context
N3.1.2 N3.1.3
calculations concerning business size, production capacity, economic environment or financial planning through the use of costing techniques.
N3.2.2
N3.3 N3.3.1
Justify and explain methods and findings concerning business size, production capacity, economic environment or financial planning through the use of costing techniques. Present results in two different ways, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams appropriate to your audience.
N3.3.2
Suggested context
Carry out tasks and share information gathered on the sectors in which engineering businesses operate, develop co-operation with others and check progress towards objectives.
WO3.2
Review the extent to which the work has been successful. Identify influential factors including own role. Identify and agree how collaborative work could be improved in the future.
WO3.3
Suggested context
Using information from others, set own targets to learn about the sectors in which engineering businesses operate.
Reference LP3.1
LP3.1.1
LP3.1.2 LP3.1.3
LP3.2
LP3.2.1
LP3.2.2
LP3.2.3
LP3.3
LP3.3.1
LP3.3.2 LP3.3.3
Exploring a problem and identifying Identify ways of overcoming a health and safety issue relating to an engineering different ways of tackling it Identifying, analysing and accurately describing the problem, and agreeing with others how to know it has been solved Selecting and using a variety of methods to come up with different ways of tackling the problem Comparing the main features and risks of each approach, and justifying the method to be used. Planning and implementing at least one way of solving the problem Planning the chosen way of solving the problem and getting the go-ahead from an appropriate person Putting the plan into action, effectively using support and feedback from others to help tackle the problem Checking regularly progress towards solving the problem, revising the approach as necessary. Checking if the problem has been solved and reviewing own approach to problem solving Applying systematically methods agreed with an appropriate person, to check if the problem has been solved Describing fully the results and drawing conclusions on how successful the learner was in solving the problem Reviewing own approach to problem solving, including whether other approaches might have proved more effective.
Upon completion of the plan, produce evidence to the teacher that the task was successful. Reflect on the process and identify what has gone well and how problem-solving skills might be improved upon in the future. Plan and implement the method chosen to overcome a health and safety issue relating to an engineering business. business.
PS3.1.2
PS3.1.3
PS3.2 PS3.2.1
PS3.2.2
PS3.2.3
PS3.3
PS3.3.1
PS3.3.2
PS3.3.3
Work experience This unit could make good use of work placements. Learning about a real engineering companys organisation, functions and how information flows through the company will enhance learner understanding. Engineering companies are likely to have internal and external factors that learners could investigate and make recommendations to reduce any negative effects. Specialist resources Learners require access to sufficient data on engineering companies. This can be in the form of case studies, industry visits or data available through learners work placements. Videos and topical news items relating to the economy, changes in legislation and social factors can be used as a stimulus for class discussion and as a background to activities and case studies.
Learning outcomes
On completion of this unit, a learner should: LO.1. Know about computer systems and methods of data storage LO.2. Know about the capabilities of design, presentation, testing and analysis software packages and how they are used as tools within engineering Be able to use a CAD package to produce 2D drawings Be able to use design software to produce 3D models for use as presentation drawings or as data for other software uses Be able to use testing and analysis simulation software as a design support tool.
LO.3. LO.4.
LO.5.
LO.2
Learners will need to investigate the application of computers and computer software for design purposes within the engineering industry. They will need to know how they can be used to design components and assemblies for manufacture, produce three-dimensional models for presentation purposes and test for material/component operation and performance. Learners will also find out how the differing types of individual software package can be combined to form integral parts of the design and pre-production process.
LO.3
Learners will need to demonstrate how to use the 2D CAD features of a CAD software package to enable production of working drawings and specifications for engineered components and assemblies in orthographic and isometric projections, system diagrams (pneumatic, hydraulic) and circuit diagrams (electrical and electronic). Learners drawings should be produced to an appropriate and recognised standard, for example BS8888.2000. Learners will research the use and features of a 3D CAD and modelling software package to enable the production of wireframe drawings, meshed surfaces and rendered solid models. Learners will also save the models in formats that enable their use for designs or presentation purposes.
LO.4. Be able to use design software to produce 3D models for use as presentation drawings or as data for other software uses LO.5 Be able to use testing and analysis simulation software as a design support tool
Learners will need to use simulation software to model the performance of a product/system or to analyse the effects of loading on the materials used in the building of an object such as a framework. They will also find out how the results of simulation can be used to assess whether a proposed design will meet the requirements of its technical specification and the steps to be taken if modifications to the design are needed in order to make it conform to specification.
LO.2
Know about the capabilities of design, presentation, testing and analysis software packages and how they are used as tools within engineering
LO.3
LO.4
Be able to use design software to produce 3D models for use as presentation drawings or as data for other software uses
LO.5
Be able to use testing and analysis simulation software as a design support tool
Marking grid
Assessment focus LO.1 Know about computer systems and methods of data storage Mark Band 1 Identifies the component parts of a typical computer system, gives a description of their functions, roles and relationships with data storage. Mark Band 2 Identifies the component parts of a typical computer system, gives a description of their functions, roles and relationships with data storage and describes two typical applications of a method of data storage. Mark Band 3 Identifies the component parts of a typical computer system, gives a description of their functions, roles and relationships with data storage, describes two typical applications of a method of data storage and compares them in terms of retrieval speed and storage size. (910) Explores and states the capabilities of commercially available software selected for the purpose of design, presentation, testing and analysis, gives examples of their use in engineering, prepares a case study to illustrate how software can be used in the preproduction of a simple engineered product and identifies how software can be used for more complex products, which involve more than one engineering process. (910) 10 10 Maximum marks available
(04) LO.2 Know about the capabilities of design, presentation, testing and analysis software packages and how they are used as tools within engineering Explores and states the capabilities of commercially available software selected for the purpose of design, presentation, testing and analysis and gives examples of their use in engineering.
(58) Explores and states the capabilities of commercially available software selected for the purpose of design, presentation, testing and analysis, gives examples of their use in engineering and prepares a case study to illustrate how software can be used in the preproduction of a simple engineered product that requires only one engineering process.
(06)
(78)
Assessment focus
LO.3 Be able to use a CAD package to produce 2D drawings to British Standards
Mark Band 1
Produces a 2D CAD working detail drawing and an assembly drawing using orthographic projection.
Mark Band 2
Produces a 2D CAD working detail drawing and an assembly drawing using orthographic projection and produces an isometric projection of both drawings.
Mark Band 3
Produces a 2D CAD working detail drawing and an assembly drawing using orthographic projection, an isometric projection of both drawings and produces a circuit and a system diagram using representations and symbols. (912) Produces a 3D representation of an industrial component for use as data for other software use or as presentation drawing and image realisation and manipulates the model to display different orientations of the component.
(06) LO.4 Be able to use design software to produce 3D models for use as presentation drawings or as data for other software uses Produces a 3D representation of a simple component as a wire frame drawing and a meshed surface drawing for use as data or as a 3D model.
(78) Produces a 3D representation of a simple component that requires the drawing, surfaces and model to be defined by methods other than simple extrusion of 2D shapes and manipulates the model to display different orientations of the component. (710) Conducts a virtual operational performance test or material analysis of a product or material, presents the results for analysis and evaluates them against the design specification for the product or material.
12
(06) LO.5 Be able to use testing and analysis simulation software as a design support tool Conducts a virtual operational performance test or material analysis of a product or material for a given purpose and presents the results for analysis.
(1114) Conducts a virtual operational performance test or material analysis of a product or material, presents the results for analysis, evaluates them against the design specification for the product or material and explains the strategy used to resolve issues in the case of noncompliance. (1114) Total marks
14
(06)
(710)
14 60
Assessment guidance
Using the marking grid Each internally assessed unit has 60 available marks in total. In some units the marking grid has been split into two grids A and B. Marking grid A contains all of the marking criteria for the unit except those which assess a learners performance in practical activities which are recorded as a witness testimony or observation record. These make up grid B. Centres must ensure that learners undertake appropriate assessment tasks to enable them to achieve the requirements of each units marking grid(s). The basic principle is that this is a best fit grid i.e. the assessor must match the overall standard of work for an assessment focus to a band. It is NOT a hurdle approach, whereby the assessor cannot award marks from the next mark band if one item for an assessment focus from a lower mark band has been omitted, regardless of the quality of the rest of the work for that assessment focus. If a learner completes all they are asked to do in a band for an assessment focus, they can be awarded the full marks for that mark band. If a learner has clearly done more on one aspect of work for an assessment focus required by a mark band, the assessor should consider whether the learner can be awarded marks from the bottom of the next mark band. If a learner has completed less than required in any aspect of work for an assessment focus, or indeed omitted an aspect, then the mark moves down within the mark band. Marking is completely separate for each assessment focus i.e. a learner can get mark band 3 on one assessment focus, mark band 1 on another etc, then all marks are added together for the unit total. It may be possible, depending on weighting of an assessment focus for a learner to pass a unit even if 0 has been given in marks for one assessment focus in the unit. A 0 mark should be used only where a learner provides no valid evidence. Any work that starts to address the requirements of the grid should normally be awarded at least one mark. Evidence generated for marking grid A will be moderated. This must be in the form of hard evidence which a moderator can reassess, such as learner produced written documents (e.g. short question answers, multiple choice question answers, materials from presentations, research notes), videos (dated) of practical activities or artefacts. Marks gained from marking grid A will be reported separately from those gained from marking grid B.
Assessment focus LO.1 Mark Band 13 (010 marks) Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the identification of the system components, and up to 2 marks for describing their function, roles and relationship with the storage of data. The description of the applications should indicate a good understanding of when particular methods of data storage are appropriate for use. Typically, up to 2 marks can be awarded for each of the two types described, although could this go to 3 if one is answered well and above that required for mark band 2, up to a maximum of 4 marks. A statement or list of applications should attract only 1 mark each. The second mark for each is based on the appropriateness of the description. At least two methods of data storage should be compared and up to 2 marks can be awarded for the comparison to include retrieval speed and storage capacities.
Assessment focus LO.2 Mark Band 13 (010 marks) Up to 4 marks can be awarded for exploring an example of software use. Marks should be awarded in relation to the consideration, within the response, of purpose of design, presentation, testing and analysis and up to 2 marks can be awarded for examples given that relate to engineering applications. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the case study identifying how design and testing software was used within the pre-production process of a relatively straightforward engineered product. One mark could be awarded for the case study relating to a more complex product and 1 mark for the process being described in a more detailed way. This would reward those who carried out research into the product and software to a greater depth.
Assessment focus LO.3 Mark Band 1 (012 marks) Each of two engineering drawings in orthographic projection should be produced, one being an assembly of a number of parts. For each of the two drawings 1 mark could be awarded for drawing accuracy, 1 mark for appropriate dimensioning and title box, and 1 mark for correct projection and adherence to BS. 1 mark could be awarded for each of the two isometric projections. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for each of the two diagrams required, one being of an electrical/electronic circuit and the other a pneumatic/hydraulic system. One mark for each correct diagram and one mark each for the correct use of BS standard symbols. Marks are not to be awarded or lost for the accurate or inaccurate functionality of the circuit or system.
Assessment focus LO.4 Mark Band 1 (014 marks) Typically up to 3 marks can be awarded for each of the two representations, wire frame and meshed surface. The award of the marks for each will depend on the representation being able to be used as data or as a 3D model. Just a printed drawing would attract minimum marks. Features demonstrating the representations as being fit for the use as data or a 3D model must be visible for all 3 marks to be awarded for each. To gain the marks from mark band 2, learners should display a greater knowledge and aptitude in the use of the software by the production of a more complex nature. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the increase in complexity over that seen in mark band 1, one that is defined by methods other than simple extrusion of 2D shapes, and up to 2 marks for use of the software to manipulate and orientate the models on screen. Up to 4 marks can be awarded to those producing components of industrial complexity and quality. Marks should be apportioned with regard to the degree of complexity displayed. For all 4 marks to be awarded it is important that the drawing and model can be used by other software or as a presentation drawing and image realisation.
Assessment focus LO.5 Mark Band 1 (014 marks) Either an operational performance test or a material analysis should be carried out in a virtual environment. Up to 4 marks can be awarded for successfully using the software and achieving recordable results. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the presentation of results in an appropriate format and suitable for future analysis To gain the marks from mark band 2, learners should refer back to the design specification for the product or material being analysed and evaluate the results of their simulation against it in order to establish whether there is conformity. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for analysis of the results and up to 2 marks can be awarded for the comparison with the specification. Marks are available for learners who know about the higher levels of the software capabilities to explain strategies used to resolve issues of non-compliance, for example by changing parameters and adopting a what if scenario. The learner should explain how the analysed results could be used to instigate design modifications in the case of non-compliance with specification. Up to 4 marks can be awarded for the explanation of the strategy and should be based on how well the suggestions will ensure the product/system/material moves into compliance.
Approaches to assessment
It may be appropriate to devise four tasks for the assessment of this unit. Task 1 could be set to cover assessment foci 1 and 2 and may be an investigative task requiring learners to look at both computer systems and specific software packages. Learners will need to look at a basic computer system, naming parts, their function and inter relationships. To move up to mark band 3 learners must explain their reasons and develop their ideas to encompass data storage, with reasoning given for each method of data storage, the advantages and disadvantages. The second part of the task could be focused around specific software applications and the requirement to produce a case study around an engineered product. For example, the development and design of a modern car would encompass the requirements of band 3. As such, the evidence for this task would need to be submitted in a report. Task 2 could focus on using CAD software to produce 2D drawings to meet the requirements of assessment focus 3. For band 1, the learner must produce one component detail drawing and one assembly drawing. Drawings should be in orthographic projection and must be correctly drawn and represented. For band 2, the drawings should be redrawn using pictorial projections. To achieve mark band 3, the two drawings must contain circuit and system symbols to British Standards. All the evidence for this task will need to be in the form of a process portfolio. Task 3 could be about using design software to produce 3D models meeting the requirements of assessment focus 4. For mark band 1 the drawings need only be simple wire frame and meshed surface type drawings. For higher mark bands the drawings should be manipulated and be usable as presentation type drawings. Evidence of manipulative skills will require capturing with screen dumps and witness statements. As such, the evidence would need to be submitted in a process portfolio. Task 4 could be a practical activity based on the testing and analysis simulation software used to investigate the performance of a product/system/material which meets the requirements of assessment focus 5. The task must give learners the opportunity to move up the mark bands by using a band one activity based on a virtual environment involving a real engineered product, system or structure which is sufficiently complex to produce a range of results which can be evaluated against its design specification. The task will test the learners competence in using simulation software but to achieve marks in the higher bands they will be need to present evidence that shows that they understand why simulation is a much better option than cutting expensive metal or building a scale model of a structure, for example when proving the design of a new a product or system. As such the evidence would need to be submitted in a process portfolio and for the higher mark band a report.
Guidance for Integrating Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Level 3
Skills in applied learning A unique and central feature of Principal Learning (PL) is the requirement that at least 50% must be completed in an applied or work-related context. This means that learners must actively engage with the curriculum they are studying, putting theory into practice and working cooperatively with other learners, with their teachers, and with people from outside the classroom. They should learn in a range of contexts and environments, carrying out investigations and active enquiries, learning through doing and relating their learning to job roles. The skills embodied in the three Essential Skills Wales (ESW) and the three wider key skills (WKS) are therefore integral to the delivery of Principal Learning (PL) at all levels and in all lines of learning. Principal Learning offers many opportunities to develop all six skills (ESW + WKS) that are required if a candidate is to achieve the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ). To achieve the WBQ at Advanced level, learners must achieve three of the six skills at Level 3, one of which must be ESW Communication, Application of Number or ICT, together with the other three skills at Level 2 Developing skills The table below lists, in the first column, the skills that a learner must develop for the ESW or WKS in question. The second column suggests a PL context in which the skill would arise naturally and might be developed. It is important that, when developing an ESW skill, both the learner and the teacher pay close attention to the section in the standards headed In order to show that you are competent. Similarly for the WKS, teachers and learners must study Part A. The third column in the table identifies the ESW or WKS component. Portfolio evidence If a learner is aiming to generate portfolio evidence in the context of a learning activity or assignment in PL, it is important to ensure that the requirements of the assignment match the evidence requirements of the skill qualification (ESW or WKS) in question, in terms of content and of presentation. A portfolio of evidence will often require more than one example of the skill, so teachers will need to identify other contexts and opportunities from the many that exist in the context of the WBQ as a whole. The table below does not include details of these requirements. It is therefore essential that teachers are familiar with: the standards for ESW and the associated documents Amplification of Evidence Requirements (which includes guidance), and Mandatory Definitions, which are available from http://old.accac.org.uk/eng/content.php?mID=752 the standards for the wider key skills and the associated document The key skills qualifications and guidance: working with others, improving own learning and performance and problem solving levels 1-4 2004 (QCA 2004); order ref QCA/04/1294, downloadable from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_6462.aspx .
It is important to emphasise that candidates may develop these skills and/or generate portfolio evidence from anywhere in their learning programme. It is therefore not necessary, nor expected, that any one unit of Principal Learning should offer development and/or evidence opportunities for all the components of each of the six skills. Where opportunities to develop these skills and to provide portfolio evidence arise naturally in learning contexts, they should be pursued; learning and assignments should not be distorted to include the skills where they do not arise naturally. Essential Skills Wales Communication The ESW standards aim to integrate the different aspects of communication (speaking and listening, reading and writing) and emphasise that communication should be purposeful. So, for example, the purpose of reading might be to inform discussion and/or writing, or a discussion might be part of a candidates preparation for a piece of writing, all in relation to the purpose of the Principal Learning unit. Application of Number The ESW standards emphasise that numbers must be applied and used for the purpose of tackling a problem or task. At Level 3, the standards are structured round the following process: Understand and tackle a problem Collect and interpret data Carry out calculations Check results Interpret results Present findings Reflect/review.
The problem should arise naturally in the context of the candidates work for the Principal Learning unit. For portfolio evidence at this level, the candidate must carry out at least one activity that shows their skills in the process as a whole, ie covering all three components of the unit. ICT As with Application of Number, the ESW standards emphasise the importance of using ICT in context and for a purpose. The Amplification of evidence requirements specifically states that You must demonstrate your ICT skills in the context of these activities; demonstrating your skills in isolation cannot be used as evidence. Also similarly to Application of Number, the learner, while developing their ICT skills, is likely to focus on parts of the process and on specific skills, but they should always have the big picture in mind and build towards seeing the process as a whole. For the portfolio, the Amplification states that: You must carry out at least two activities that, overall: show that you can plan and carry through a number of different activities, one of which must be a complex activity covering ICT3.1, ICT3.2 and ICT3.3. While much of the portfolio evidence may be presented electronically and/or as printouts, it is essential that it shows the processes the candidate used to confirm their understanding of their task, to select, enter and develop information, and to present their work. This will normally involve drafting, revising, correcting, redrafting or reformatting the work. This is therefore an important aspect of developing ESW ICT, and the evidence submitted for assessment must include at least one complete draft with notes, annotations, highlighting, alterations etc. The final printouts, presentations etc are not, on their own, sufficient as evidence, though they must be included in the portfolio.
The wider key skills All three of the wider key skills require the candidate to learn and to demonstrate the process skills of: Planning Doing Reviewing.
Each component of this process can be learned and developed separately, though portfolio evidence must cover all three components of the qualification in a single activity. Working with Others at Level 3 requires that the example in the portfolio shows that the learner can work as part of a group or team made up of at least three people (i.e. the learner works with at least two other people). The learner must become conscious of and focus on their own skills and how they relate to others if they are to develop their ability to contribute effectively to a team project or activity. They must be able to review their work with others, identify factors that influenced the outcome and agree how to improve their teamworking skills for the future. The evidence in a candidates portfolio must show their individual contribution to the work of the group. Problem Solving is a skill that many younger learners do not at first recognise as a skill that, like other skills, involves learning and developing specialised techniques. The learner has to identify and analyse a problem (which must be individual to them, not a group activity), come up with different ways of tackling it and choose one, make a plan, follow it, and check whether the problem has been solved. They must then review their approach to problem solving. As with Working with Others, each phase can be focused on separately in the learning and development phase, but the portfolio requires two examples, each of which follows though all three components of the qualification. Improving Own Learning and Performance, like the other wider key skills, requires the learner to become consciously aware of how they learn and which ways of learning are most effective for them in different situations. Many learners will have used only one or two ways of learning hitherto and need to be introduced to other possibilities. They must take responsibility for improving their learning and performance, set targets for what they want to learn or do, make a plan with targets, follow the plan, reflect on and review their progress, establish what they have achieved, and agree ways to further improve their performance. Any of the learning outcomes in the Principal Learning unit could provide opportunities to develop IOLP skills, but SMART targets must be set that relate to the purpose of the unit. The portfolio of evidence must include at least one example that covers at least three targets. Overall, the evidence must show at least two different ways of learning.
Suggested context
C3.1.2
information feelings opinions questions complex instructions on a range of familiar and unfamiliar topics, using appropriate language and non-verbal communication, and in a range of contexts. (a) Taking part in formal discussions with two or more other people (b) Giving a talk/presentation of at least eight minutes. Reading
Reading, understanding and synthesising information from at least two documents about the same subject.
C3.1.3
C3.2 C3.2.1
Research information concerning commercially available software for design, presentation, testing and analysis. Synthesis this information to inform a report.
Each document must be at least 1,000 words long. At least one must contain complex information or reasoning and at least one must contain an image Writing
Writing two documents of different types, each one giving different information to different audiences about complex subjects in appropriate formats and using language that is appropriate to purpose and audience. One document must be at least 1,000 words long.
C3.3 C3.3.1
Produce a report about commercially available software for design, presentation, testing and analysis. Produce a handout to accompany the talk/presentation.
Suggested context
ICT3.1.2 ICT3.1.3
Following safe, healthy and secure working practices at all times. Finding, selecting and exchanging information Planning how to find the ICT-based and non ICT-based information required. Searching for, evaluating, selecting and getting, from a range of sources, relevant ICT-based and non ICTbased information. Entering, saving, communicating and exchanging ICT-based information to suit the purpose. Developing and presenting information Organising, developing, formatting and combining ICT-based and non ICT-based information from different sources to suit content and purpose, in the form of: a) text b) tables c) images d) numbers e) records. Presenting the final output effectively, using a consistent style and formats and layouts that are appropriate to purpose and audience, using ICT, and reviewing the work.
Use ICT to present combined, organised and formatted ICT and non ICT information, including text, tables, images numbers and records in a presentation on the component parts of a typical computer system. Include information regarding functions, roles and relationships with data storage. Review work. Plan, search for, select and evaluate ICT based and non ICT based sources concerning the component parts of a typical computer system. Enter, save, communicate and exchange the information to inform a presentation.
ICT3.2 ICT3.2.1
ICT3.1.2
ICT3.1.3
ICT3.3 ICT3.3.1
ICT3.3.2
Essential Skills Wales: Application of Number Skill/s to be developed Understanding numerical data Identifying, analysing and accurately describing at least one practical problem or task that involves a range of numerical data and information. Planning how to tackle it. Collecting relevant numerical data and information from a range of sources to meet the purpose of the task. Sources must include at least two of a table, a chart, a graph or a diagram, of which at least one must be complex, and a large data set. Carrying out calculations Choosing and using appropriate methods to get the results needed and justifying the methods used. Using the data and information obtained to carry out calculations relevant to the task to do with: e) amounts or sizes f) scales or proportion g) handling statistics h) using formulae Interpreting results and presenting findings Selecting and justifying two different ways to present results, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams appropriate to audience. Presenting and explaining methods and findings and justifying how they meet the purpose of the task and are appropriate to the audience. Justify and explain methods and findings concerning the suitability of a product or material for a given purpose. Present results in two different ways, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams appropriate to your audience. Select and justify methods, identify calculations needed and carry out calculations to determine the suitability of a product or material for a given purpose. N3.2 N3.2.1 Identify, analyse and describe a practical problem/task(s) related to carrying out a virtual operational performance test or material analysis. Obtain relevant numerical data from a range of sources. Suggested context Reference N3.1 N3.1.1
N3.1.2 N3.1.3
N3.2.2
N3.3 N3.3.1
N3.3.2
Suggested context
Carry out tasks and share information gathered while using testing and analysis simulation software to model the performance of a product/system. Develop co-operation with others and check progress towards objectives.
Review the extent to which the work has been successful. Identify influential factors including own role. Identify and agree how collaborative work could be improved in the future.
Suggested context
Setting and planning for the achievement of learning targets for the production of CAD drawings.
Reference LP3.1
LP3.1.1
LP3.1.2 LP3.1.3
LP3.2
LP3.2.1
LP3.2.2
LP3.2.3
LP3.3
LP3.3.1
LP3.3.2 LP3.3.3
Exploring a problem and identifying Identify the best method to use when designing, planning, presenting and different ways of tackling it Identifying, analysing and accurately describing the problem, and agreeing with others how to know it has been solved Selecting and using a variety of methods to come up with different ways of tackling the problem Comparing the main features and risks of each approach, and justifying the method to be used. Planning and implementing at least one way of solving the problem Planning the chosen way of solving the problem and getting the go-ahead from an appropriate person Putting the plan into action, effectively using support and feedback from others to help tackle the problem Checking regularly progress towards solving the problem, revising the approach as necessary. Checking if the problem has been solved and reviewing own approach to problem solving Applying systematically methods agreed with an appropriate person, to check if the problem has been solved Describing fully the results and drawing conclusions on how successful the learner was in solving the problem Reviewing own approach to problem solving, including whether other approaches might have proved more effective.
Upon completion of the plan, review the outcome in terms of the objectives. Identify the successful aspects of the task and also identify ways to improve problem solving skills. Make a plan. After discussion with a teacher, follow the plan, reviewing where necessary. testing an engineered product.
PS3.1.2
PS3.1.3
PS3.2 PS3.2.1
PS3.2.2
PS3.2.3
PS3.3
PS3.3.1
PS3.3.2
PS3.3.3
Work experience This unit would be ideal for some level of work placement as it would be of huge benefit for learners to see the use of computers and associated software within the design and pre-production process in an industrial situation. If work placements are available, assignments based around the placement would be beneficial and are encouraged. However, it is appreciated that suitable placements are not always available, and inhouse assignments are acceptable as a means of assessment. Specialist resources Centres will require access to: computer systems of suitable high processing specification suitable 2D and 3D design software and training publications testing and analysis software presentation software internet access.
Learning outcomes
On completion of this unit, a learner should: LO.1. Know about the structure and their effects on the mechanical properties of engineering materials. LO.2. Know about the forms of supply, applications and the selection of engineering materials. LO.3. Know about the impact of processing on the structure of engineering materials. LO.4. Know about the effects of loading, modes of failure and carry out testing of engineering materials.
LO.2
Know about the forms of supply, applications and the selection of engineering materials
LO.3
LO.4
Know about the effects of loading, modes of failure and carry out testing of engineering materials
LO.2
Describe and review the properties, a form of supply and an application of a given metal a given polymer and a given composite material Select and review the use of an information source to select material for a given purpose. Describe work hardening and grain growth in metals and the glass transition temperature in polymers and the related micro-structure changes that occur. Distinguish between annealing, quench hardening and tempering, case hardening and precipitation hardening, identify the applicable materials and state the property and structural changes that occur. Carry out appropriate calculations relating to the loading of engineering materials. Describe the modes of failure and the characteristics of appearance that can occur in engineering materials and the related service conditions under which they can occur. Carry out a destructive and a nondestructive material test and record and review the test data and describe possible industrial settings.
LO.3
LO.4
Know about the effects of loading, modes of failure and carry out testing of engineering materials
Marking grid
Assessment focus LO.1 Know about the structure and their effects on the mechanical properties of engineering materials Mark Band 1 Describes crystal lattice and polymer structures and their effect on the mechanical properties of metals and plastics. Mark Band 2 Describes crystal lattice and polymer structures and their effect on the mechanical and electrical properties of metals and plastics. Mark Band 3 Describes crystal lattice and polymer structures and their effect on the mechanical, electrical and thermal properties of metals and plastics. Maximum marks available
(04) LO.2.1 Forms of supply and applications Describes a form of supply and an application of a given metal, a given polymer and a given composite material. (03) LO.2.2 Information sources and material selection Uses a given information source to select material for a given purpose.
(56) Describes the properties, a form of supply and an application of a given metal, a given polymer and a given composite material. (46) Selects an information source and uses it to select material for a given purpose.
(78) Justifies an application of a given metal, a given polymer and a given composite material in terms of the material properties and form of supply. (79) Selects an information source and justifies its use to select material for a given purpose.
(03)
(45)
(67)
Mark Band 1 Describes the occurrence of work hardening and grain growth in metals and the glass transition temperature in polymers.
Mark Band 2 Describes the change in the properties of metals due to the occurrence of work hardening and grain growth and due to the occurrence of the glass transition temperature in polymers.
Mark Band 3 Describes the change in the properties of metals due to the occurrence of work hardening and grain growth, and the change in properties of polymers due to the occurrence of the glass transition temperature making reference to the micro-structure of the materials. (67) Distinguishes between annealing, quench hardening, tempering, case hardening and precipitation hardening processes stating the materials to which they are applicable, the property changes that occur and the structural changes that take place during the processes. (78) Calculates direct stress and strain, factor of safety, shear stress and strain, modulus of elasticity and shear modulus of given loaded material. (67)
(03) LO. 3.2 Heat treatment Distinguishes between annealing, quench hardening and tempering, case hardening and precipitation hardening of materials.
(45) Distinguishes between annealing, quench hardening and tempering, case hardening and precipitation hardening processes stating the materials to which they are applicable and property changes that occur.
(04) LO.4.1 Mechanical loading Calculates direct stress, factor of safety and shear stress in given loaded materials.
(56) Calculates direct stress and strain, factor of safety and shear stress and strain in given loaded materials. (45)
(03)
Mark Band 1 Describes three modes of failure that can occur in engineering materials.
Mark Band 2 Describe three modes of failure that can occur in engineering materials and the service conditions under which two of them are likely to happen.
Mark Band 3 Describe three modes of failure that can occur in engineering materials, the service conditions under which two of them are likely to happen and the characteristic appearance of the two failure modes. (67) Carries out a destructive and a non-destructive material test, analyses the test data to verify the material properties or nature of faults and describes industrial settings where such tests would be routine. (67)
(03) LO.4.3 Material testing Carries out a destructive and a non-destructive material test and record the test data.
(45) Carries out a destructive and a non-destructive material test and analyses the test data to verify the material properties or nature of faults.
(03)
(45)
7 Total marks 60
Assessment guidance
Using the marking grid Each internally assessed unit has 60 available marks in total. In some units the marking grid has been split into two grids A and B. Marking grid A contains all of the marking criteria for the unit except those which assess a learners performance in practical activities which are recorded as a witness testimony or observation record. These make up grid B. Centres must ensure that learners undertake appropriate assessment tasks to enable them to achieve the requirements of each units marking grid(s). The basic principle is that this is a best fit grid i.e. the assessor must match the overall standard of work for an assessment focus to a band. It is NOT a hurdle approach, whereby the assessor cannot award marks from the next mark band if one item for an assessment focus from a lower mark band has been omitted, regardless of the quality of the rest of the work for that assessment focus. If a learner completes all they are asked to do in a band for an assessment focus, they can be awarded the full marks for that mark band. If a learner has clearly done more on one aspect of work for an assessment focus required by a mark band, the assessor should consider whether the learner can be awarded marks from the bottom of the next mark band. If a learner has completed less than required in any aspect of work for an assessment focus, or indeed omitted an aspect, then the mark moves down within the mark band. Marking is completely separate for each assessment focus i.e. a learner can get mark band 3 on one assessment focus, mark band 1 on another etc, then all marks are added together for the unit total. It may be possible, depending on weighting of an assessment focus for a learner to pass a unit even if 0 has been given in marks for one assessment focus in the unit. A 0 mark should be used only where a learner provides no valid evidence. Any work that starts to address the requirements of the grid should normally be awarded at least one mark. Evidence generated for marking grid A will be moderated. This must be in the form of hard evidence which a moderator can reassess, such as learner produced written documents (e.g. short question answers, multiple choice question answers, materials from presentations, research notes), videos (dated) of practical activities or artefacts. Marks gained from marking grid A will be reported separately from those gained from marking grid B.
Assessment focus LO.2.1 Mark Band 13 (09 marks) 1 mark each can be awarded for describing a form of supply and application of each of the three given materials, e.g. given metal, polymer and composite. 1 mark each can be awarded for describing the properties of each of the three given material. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for justifying the application of the given materials in terms of their properties and forms of supply. Both properties and forms of supply should be linked to the application to get both marks.
Assessment focus LO.2.2 Mark Band 13 (07 marks) Up to 3 marks can be awarded for using a given information source to select a material for a given purpose. The selection of the material should mean that it would be able to function in line with the given purpose and the references back to the information source should clearly demonstrate this. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for selecting and using an appropriate information source. The marks should be awarded based on its ability to give the data required for the given purpose. Marks are form the correct selection. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for justifying the selection of an appropriate information source in terms of accessibility, ease of use and the range and depth of information provided.
Assessment focus LO.3.1 Mark Band 13 (07 marks) 1 mark can be awarded for each response describing the occurrence of work hardening and grain growth in metals and the glass transition temperature in polymers. 1 mark can be awarded for describing the change in the properties of metals due to the occurrence of work hardening and grain growth and 1 mark for describing the change in the properties in polymers due to the occurrence of the glass transition temperature. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for making reference to the microstructure of the materials during the descriptions relating to changes in properties.
Assessment focus LO.3.2 Mark Band 13 (08 marks) Up to 4 marks can be awarded for distinguishing between the given heat treatments. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for stating the materials for which the given processes are applicable and the property changes that occur. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for describing the structural changes that take place during the given processes.
Assessment focus LO.4.1 Mark Band 13 (07 marks) 1 mark can be awarded for calculating each of direct stress, factor of safety and shear stress in given loaded materials. 1 mark can be awarded for calculating each of direct and shear strain. 1 mark can be awarded for calculating each of modulus of elasticity and shear modulus.
Assessment focus LO.4.2 Mark Band 13 (07 marks) 1 mark each can be awarded for describing three modes of failure. 1 mark each can be awarded for describing the conditions under which two of the modes of failure are likely to happen. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for describing the characteristics of the failure modes. This response should indicate how a failure might become visible before and during the failure.
Assessment focus LO.4.3 Mark Band 13 (07 marks) Up to 3 marks can be awarded for carrying out a destructive, a nondestructive test and recording the test data. This should be based on the tests being carried out effectively and safely and the data recorded being able to be understood by a third party. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for analysing the test data to determine and verify the material properties or the nature of faults. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for describing the industrial settings where the tests would be routinely carried out.
Approaches to assessment
It may be best to devise four tasks for the assessment of this unit. Task 1 could cover the requirements of assessment foci 1 and 2.1 and 2.2 with written activities. Learners could be asked to describe, with the aid of diagrams, the crystal lattice structures commonly found in metals and also give a general description of polymer structures. These could be accompanied by a description of their effects on the mechanical, electrical and thermal properties of metals and plastics for assessment focus 1. An activity could also be set which requires learners to justify the application of materials for selected purposes in terms of the material properties and forms of supply for assessment focus 2.1. A final activity would require learners to select an information source and justify its use in terms of its accessibility, breadth and depth of information contained and user friendliness in selecting a material for a given purpose to address assessment focus 2.2. All of the evidence for this task will need to be in the form of a report. Task 2 could link assessment foci 3.1 and 3.2 with written activities. To address the requirements of focus 3.1 learners could be asked to describe the change in the properties of metals due to cold working and hot working. The effects of cold working should include a description of the structural deformation that leads to work hardening. The effects of hot working should make mention of allotropic change, grain flow and grain growth. Learners could also be asked to describe the change in the properties of thermoplastics due to the occurrence of the glass transition temperature. To address the requirements of assessment focus 3.2, learners could be asked to describe the range of heat treatment processes, the materials to which they are applicable and the associated structural and property changes. Throughout the task, reference should be made to the micro-structure of the materials accompanied by suitable diagrams and sketches. All of the evidence for this task will need to be in the form of a report. Task 3 could link assessment foci 4.1 and 4.2 with written activities including calculations. To address the requirements of focus 4.1, learners could be asked to calculate the direct and shear stress in loaded engineering components and factor of safety in operation. They could also be asked to calculate direct and shear strain from given data and the elastic moduli of the materials. The calculations should be realistic and apply to typical engineering materials in a service environment. To address the requirements of assessment focus 4.2 learners could be asked to describe three different modes of failure that can occur in engineering materials and the service conditions under which two of them are likely to occur. The descriptions should be accompanied by sketches to illustrate the characteristic appearance of the material in the locality of the failure. All of the evidence for this task will need to be in the form of a report. Task 4 could address the requirements of assessment focus 4.3 and should require the learner to carry out a destructive and a non-destructive material test. It is likely that the evidence would include a witness statement/observation record supplemented by annotated photographs for this part of the task. Learners could be asked to submit test outcomes containing a record and analyse the test results to verify the properties or condition of the materials. They could also be asked to describe typical industrial situations where such tests would be routinely carried out. All of the evidence for this task will need to be in the form of a process portfolio.
When considering heat treatment processes it should be explained that annealing/normalising can be carried out on non-metals, particularly on glass, to relieve internal stresses. The relevant part of the iron-carbon thermal equilibrium diagram should be introduced when describing the annealing, normalising and quench hardening of plain carbon steels. Similarly, the relevant part of the aluminium-copper thermal equilibrium diagram can be used to illustrate the precipitation hardening of duralumin-type aluminium alloys. The carburising process for low carbon steel using solid, liquid and gaseous carbon-bearing media should be explained together with the secondary processes to refine the core and harden the carbon-enriched case of the material. The final learning outcome is concerned with the loading of materials within their elastic range, the modes of failure that might be encountered and test procedures that are used to verify the properties of engineering materials or to detect material flaws and faults. The explanation of direct and shear stress and strain, factor of safety and elastic moduli should be accompanied by the tutor-led solution of problems. Learners should be made aware that calculated values of stress may be exceeded in practice due to the presence of stress concentrations at the points of loading, holes and internal corners etc. When considering modes of failure, it should be explained that failure does not necessarily mean that a material has fractured. Permanent deformation caused by exceeding the elastic limit of a material may be classed as failure. Learners should be aware that factor of safety may be calculated against the ultimate strength of a material or against its elastic limit stress. If available, it will be useful to present specimen components for learners to inspect when explaining the occurrence of ductile fracture, brittle fracture, fatigue and creep failure. Learners should be familiar with the range of material tests that are routinely carried out in engineering and given the opportunity to carry out a destructive and a non-destructive test from the range. The tests should be carried out using industrial standard equipment in an approved manner and making full use of personal protective equipment. Some instruction in technical report writing may be appropriate to ensure that learners present their recorded data, analysis and findings in a logical way.
Guidance for Integrating Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Level 3
Skills in applied learning A unique and central feature of Principal Learning (PL) is the requirement that at least 50% must be completed in an applied or work-related context. This means that learners must actively engage with the curriculum they are studying, putting theory into practice and working cooperatively with other learners, with their teachers, and with people from outside the classroom. They should learn in a range of contexts and environments, carrying out investigations and active enquiries, learning through doing and relating their learning to job roles. The skills embodied in the three Essential Skills Wales (ESW) and the three wider key skills (WKS) are therefore integral to the delivery of Principal Learning (PL) at all levels and in all lines of learning. Principal Learning offers many opportunities to develop all six skills (ESW + WKS) that are required if a candidate is to achieve the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ). To achieve the WBQ at Advanced level, learners must achieve three of the six skills at Level 3, one of which must be ESW Communication, Application of Number or ICT, together with the other three skills at Level 2 Developing skills The table below lists, in the first column, the skills that a learner must develop for the ESW or WKS in question. The second column suggests a PL context in which the skill would arise naturally and might be developed. It is important that, when developing an ESW skill, both the learner and the teacher pay close attention to the section in the standards headed In order to show that you are competent. Similarly for the WKS, teachers and learners must study Part A. The third column in the table identifies the ESW or WKS component. Portfolio evidence If a learner is aiming to generate portfolio evidence in the context of a learning activity or assignment in PL, it is important to ensure that the requirements of the assignment match the evidence requirements of the skill qualification (ESW or WKS) in question, in terms of content and of presentation. A portfolio of evidence will often require more than one example of the skill, so teachers will need to identify other contexts and opportunities from the many that exist in the context of the WBQ as a whole. The table below does not include details of these requirements. It is therefore essential that teachers are familiar with: the standards for ESW and the associated documents Amplification of Evidence Requirements (which includes guidance), and Mandatory Definitions, which are available from http://old.accac.org.uk/eng/content.php?mID=752 the standards for the wider key skills and the associated document The key skills qualifications and guidance: working with others, improving own learning and performance and problem solving levels 1-4 2004 (QCA 2004); order ref QCA/04/1294, downloadable from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_6462.aspx .
It is important to emphasise that candidates may develop these skills and/or generate portfolio evidence from anywhere in their learning programme. It is therefore not necessary, nor expected, that any one unit of Principal Learning should offer development and/or evidence opportunities for all the components of each of the six skills. Where opportunities to develop these skills and to provide portfolio evidence arise naturally in learning contexts, they should be pursued; learning and assignments should not be distorted to include the skills where they do not arise naturally. Essential Skills Wales Communication The ESW standards aim to integrate the different aspects of communication (speaking and listening, reading and writing) and emphasise that communication should be purposeful. So, for example, the purpose of reading might be to inform discussion and/or writing, or a discussion might be part of a candidates preparation for a piece of writing, all in relation to the purpose of the Principal Learning unit. Application of Number The ESW standards emphasise that numbers must be applied and used for the purpose of tackling a problem or task. At Level 3, the standards are structured round the following process: Understand and tackle a problem Collect and interpret data Carry out calculations Check results Interpret results Present findings Reflect/review.
The problem should arise naturally in the context of the candidates work for the Principal Learning unit. For portfolio evidence at this level, the candidate must carry out at least one activity that shows their skills in the process as a whole, ie covering all three components of the unit. ICT As with Application of Number, the ESW standards emphasise the importance of using ICT in context and for a purpose. The Amplification of evidence requirements specifically states that You must demonstrate your ICT skills in the context of these activities; demonstrating your skills in isolation cannot be used as evidence. Also similarly to Application of Number, the learner, while developing their ICT skills, is likely to focus on parts of the process and on specific skills, but they should always have the big picture in mind and build towards seeing the process as a whole. For the portfolio, the Amplification states that: You must carry out at least two activities that, overall: show that you can plan and carry through a number of different activities, one of which must be a complex activity covering ICT3.1, ICT3.2 and ICT3.3. While much of the portfolio evidence may be presented electronically and/or as printouts, it is essential that it shows the processes the candidate used to confirm their understanding of their task, to select, enter and develop information, and to present their work. This will normally involve drafting, revising, correcting, redrafting or reformatting the work. This is therefore an important aspect of developing ESW ICT, and the evidence submitted for assessment must include at least one complete draft with notes, annotations, highlighting, alterations etc. The final printouts, presentations etc are not, on their own, sufficient as evidence, though they must be included in the portfolio.
The wider key skills All three of the wider key skills require the candidate to learn and to demonstrate the process skills of: Planning Doing Reviewing.
Each component of this process can be learned and developed separately, though portfolio evidence must cover all three components of the qualification in a single activity. Working with Others at Level 3 requires that the example in the portfolio shows that the learner can work as part of a group or team made up of at least three people (i.e. the learner works with at least two other people). The learner must become conscious of and focus on their own skills and how they relate to others if they are to develop their ability to contribute effectively to a team project or activity. They must be able to review their work with others, identify factors that influenced the outcome and agree how to improve their teamworking skills for the future. The evidence in a candidates portfolio must show their individual contribution to the work of the group. Problem Solving is a skill that many younger learners do not at first recognise as a skill that, like other skills, involves learning and developing specialised techniques. The learner has to identify and analyse a problem (which must be individual to them, not a group activity), come up with different ways of tackling it and choose one, make a plan, follow it, and check whether the problem has been solved. They must then review their approach to problem solving. As with Working with Others, each phase can be focused on separately in the learning and development phase, but the portfolio requires two examples, each of which follows though all three components of the qualification. Improving Own Learning and Performance, like the other wider key skills, requires the learner to become consciously aware of how they learn and which ways of learning are most effective for them in different situations. Many learners will have used only one or two ways of learning hitherto and need to be introduced to other possibilities. They must take responsibility for improving their learning and performance, set targets for what they want to learn or do, make a plan with targets, follow the plan, reflect on and review their progress, establish what they have achieved, and agree ways to further improve their performance. Any of the learning outcomes in the Principal Learning unit could provide opportunities to develop IOLP skills, but SMART targets must be set that relate to the purpose of the unit. The portfolio of evidence must include at least one example that covers at least three targets. Overall, the evidence must show at least two different ways of learning.
Suggested context
C3.1.2
information feelings opinions questions complex instructions on a range of familiar and unfamiliar topics, using appropriate language and non-verbal communication, and in a range of contexts. (a) Taking part in formal discussions with two or more other people
(b) Giving a talk/presentation of at least eight minutes.
C3.1.3
Reading
Reading, understanding and synthesising information from at least two documents about the same subject. Research information concerning the physical and mechanical properties of engineering materials from at least two documents. Synthesis this information, to include a comparison, with calculations and test data, to be able to describe structures, forms of supply and reasons for specific selection of material.
C3.2 C3.2.1
Each document must be at least 1,000 words long. At least one must contain complex information or reasoning and at least one must contain an image Writing
Writing two documents of different types, each one giving different information to different audiences about complex subjects in appropriate formats and using language that is appropriate to purpose and audience. One document must be at least 1,000 words long.
C3.3 C3.3.1
Produce an essay about the structures of materials, the effects of the structure on the materials mechanical properties, supply and use. Produce a report on the results of destructive and non destructive tests, showing the complex links between the observed behaviour of the material under test and its structure.
Suggested context
ICT3.1.2 ICT3.1.3
Following safe, healthy and secure working practices at all times. Finding, selecting and exchanging information Planning how to find the ICT-based and non ICT-based information required. Searching for, evaluating, selecting and getting, from a range of sources, relevant ICT-based and non ICTbased information. Entering, saving, communicating and exchanging ICT-based information to suit the purpose. Developing and presenting information Organising, developing, formatting and combining ICT-based and non ICT-based information from different sources to suit content and purpose, in the form of: a) text b) tables c) images d) numbers e) records. Presenting the final output effectively, using a consistent style and formats and layouts that are appropriate to purpose and audience, using ICT, and reviewing the work.
Use ICT to present combined, organised and formatted ICT and non ICT information, including text, tables, images numbers and records in a presentation on the structure, properties, supply and use of engineering materials. Review work. Plan, search for, select and evaluate ICT based and non ICT based sources concerning the structure, properties, supply and use of engineering materials. Enter, save, communicate and exchange the information to inform a presentation.
ICT3.2 ICT3.2.1
ICT3.1.2
ICT3.1.3
ICT3.3 ICT3.3.1
ICT3.3.2
Suggested context
N3.1.2 N3.1.3
N3.2 N3.2.1
N3.2.2
N3.3 N3.3.1
Justify and explain methods and findings concerning the engineering materials. Present results in two different ways, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams appropriate to your audience.
N3.3.2
Planning work with others Agreeing realistic objectives for working together and what needs to be done to achieve them Sharing relevant information to help agree roles and responsibilities Agreeing suitable working arrangements with those involved. Seeking to develop co-operation and checking progress towards agreed objectives Organising and carrying out tasks efficiently to meet responsibilities Seeking effective ways to develop cooperation including ways to resolve any conflict Sharing accurate information on progress, agreeing changes where necessary to achieve objectives. Reviewing work with others and agreeing ways of improving collaborative work in the future Agreeing the extent to which work with others has been successful and the objectives have been met Identifying factors, including own role, in influencing the outcome Agreeing ways of improving own work with others in the future, including interpersonal skills.
Upon completion of the testing, meet with the team to review the extent to which the work has been successful. Identify influential factors including own role. Identify and agree how collaborative work could be improved in the future. Work in a team to carry out testing of engineering materials to find out about different effects. Draw up a work schedule, dividing workload and responsibilities.
WO3.2
WO3.3
Suggested context
Set learning targets and prepare an action plan for investigation information sources to be used for the selection of engineering materials.
Reference LP3.1
LP3.1.1
LP3.1.2 LP3.1.3
LP3.2
LP3.2.1
LP3.2.2
LP3.2.3
LP3.3
LP3.3.1
LP3.3.2 LP3.3.3
Exploring a problem and identifying Identify different ways of solving a problem arising from the results of tests different ways of tackling it Identifying, analysing and accurately describing the problem, and agreeing with others how to know it has been solved Selecting and using a variety of methods to come up with different ways of tackling the problem Comparing the main features and risks of each approach, and justifying the method to be used. Planning and implementing at least one way of solving the problem Planning the chosen way of solving the problem and getting the go-ahead from an appropriate person Putting the plan into action, effectively using support and feedback from others to help tackle the problem Checking regularly progress towards solving the problem, revising the approach as necessary. Checking if the problem has been solved and reviewing own approach to problem solving Applying systematically methods agreed with an appropriate person, to check if the problem has been solved Describing fully the results and drawing conclusions on how successful the learner was in solving the problem Reviewing own approach to problem solving, including whether other approaches might have proved more effective.
Review whether the targets and objectives have been met and the problem has been solved. Identify ways to improve problem-solving skills in the future. Plan how to solve the problem. Following discussing with a tutor implement the plan to meet the objectives, revising where necessary. on engineering materials. Choose and justify one way.
PS3.1.2
PS3.1.3
PS3.2 PS3.2.1
PS3.2.2
PS3.2.3
PS3.3
PS3.3.1
PS3.3.2
PS3.3.3
Work experience Evidence for this unit could be gathered during an appropriate work placement. Participating in the assembly or dismantling of engineered products, inspection of components and material test procedures can help reinforce the delivery of the unit. Specialist resources Learners should have access to a wide range of material specimens and failed components for visual and tactile inspection. The availability of metallurgical microscopes and a range of polished and etched specimens would be an additional advantage. Access to industrial standard test equipment is necessary for assessment focus 3.4.3. Learners should have access to a range of material information sources such as manufacturers data sheets, relevant British Standards, CDR and the internet. The following websites give free access to material selection data: www.avestapolarit.com www.copper.org www.matweb.com www.plaspec.com www.sandvik.com www.steelforge.com www.structural-engineering.fsnet.co.uk The BBC Engineering Craft Studies and Technical Studies range of videos will provide a useful reinforcement to delivery. These are available from: BBC Videos for Education and Training Woodlands 80 Wood Lane London W12 0TT Telephone: 020 8576 2541 Reference material Darbyshire A Mechanical Engineering BTEC Optional Units (Newnes, 2003) ISBN 0750657618 Higgins R Materials for Engineers and Technicians (Newnes, 2006) ISBN 0750668504 Timings R L Engineering Materials, Volume 1 (Longman, 1998) ISBN 0582319285 Timings R L Engineering Materials, Volume 2 (Longman, 2000) ISBN 0582404665
Learning outcomes
On completion of this unit, a learner should: LO.1. Understand the difference between analogue and digital signals and the need for various forms of transmission media LO.2. Know about the use of sensors, transducers and instrumentation displays in instrumentation and control applications LO.3. Understand the principles and difference between open loop and closed loop systems LO.4. Understand the use of programmable logic controllers in instrumentation and control applications LO.5. Understand applications of control engineering.
LO.3
Understand the principles and difference between open loop and closed loop systems
LO.4
Understand the use of programmable logic controllers in instrumentatio n and control applications
Learners will need to find out about and program programmable logic controllers (PLCs), which are specialised computers that control automation processes by reading the inputs from sensors and transducers and controlling actuators. Learners will be introduced to the basic concept of the PLC and also to some possible alternatives, e.g. PICs (peripheral interface controller) and microcontrollers, and understand the relative advantages, e.g. rugged construction suitable for harsh industrial environments, simple programming, modular construction, easily expandable, easily reconfigurable. They will also need to know about the disadvantages, e.g. relatively high cost compared with other solutions (such as PC-based controllers), components and modules not interchangeable between manufacturers, operation limited to less sophisticated applications, not suitable for highspeed control applications. Learners will investigate system components, e.g. microcontroller as a programmable controller remote or handheld programmer digital output via relays (either electromagnetic or solid-state), digital input via optical isolators, analogue input via analogue to digital converter (ADC), analogue output via digital to analogue converter (DAC), modular rack.
LO.5
Learners will need to investigate an application of control engineering. Examples might include washing machines, DVD (digital versatile disk) drives, satellite antenna steering systems, motorcar engine or braking systems, CNC (computer numerical control) machines or robots. Learners will need to find out how to represent an application of a control system by the use of a block diagram, e.g. labelled inputs, labelled outputs, energy sources, controller, additional signal conditioning (amplification, filtering, etc). They will also need to know about types of sensors, transducers, actuators and displays, e.g. a temperature sensor such as a thermocouple or semiconductor temperature sensor, a position sensor such as a linear or rotary potentiometer or linear variable differential transducer (LVDT), an angular speed sensor such as a tachogenerator, an optical shaft encoder, a DC motor, a stepper motor, a relay (either electromechanical or solid-state), an actuator (linear or rotary type), a gearbox, a moving coil meter, (x) an liquid crystal display (LCD), a light emitting diode (LED) display, an LED bar or seven-segment display, a cathode ray tube (CRT) display.
LO.2
Know about the use of sensors, transducers and instrumentation displays in instrumentation and control applications
LO.3
Understand the principles and difference between open loop and closed loop systems
LO.4
Understand the use of programmable logic controllers in instrumentation and control applications Understand applications of control engineering
LO.5
Marking grid
Assessment focus LO.1 Understand the difference between analogue and digital signals and the need for various forms of transmission media Mark Band 1 Describes the fundamental characteristics of analogue and digital signals and explains the need for the different types of transmission media. Mark Band 2 Describes the fundamental characteristics of analogue and digital signals, explains the need for the different types of transmission media and explains the methods of connecting and interfacing analogue and digital signals taking into account their characteristics and the properties of different types of transmission media. Mark Band 3 Describes the fundamental characteristics of analogue and digital signals, explains the need for the different types of transmission media, explains different methods of connecting and interfacing analogue and digital signals taking into account their characteristics and the properties of different types of transmission media and explains the process of signal conversion from analogue to digital, digital to analogue, serial to parallel and parallel to serial. (1013) Describes instrumentation and control systems and explains the role and operation of digital and analogue sensors, transducers and displays in instrumentation and control applications and evaluates a complete instrumentation and control system and explains the process of code conversion and display technology (as appropriate to the system). (810) 10 13 Maximum marks available
(05) LO.2 Know about the use of sensors, transducers and instrumentation displays in instrumentation and control applications Describes instrumentation and control systems and explains the role of digital and analogue sensors, transducers and displays in instrumentation and control applications.
(69) Describes instrumentation and control systems and explains the role and operation of digital and analogue sensors, transducers and displays in instrumentation and control applications.
(04)
(57)
Assessment focus LO.3 Understand the principles and difference between open loop and closed loop systems
Mark Band 1 Describes the principles of open loop and closed loop control.
Mark Band 2 Describes the principles of open loop and closed loop control and explains the simplified arrangement of a practical closed loop control system, differentiating between positive and negative feedback and feed-forward.
Mark Band 3 Describes the principles of open loop and closed loop control, explains the simplified arrangement of a practical closed loop control system, differentiates between positive and negative feedback and feed-forward and evaluates the operation of a complete control system that incorporates proportional, integral and derivative control. (810) Describes a PLC system, explains its advantages, disadvantages and operation, programs it to carry out a single specified task and evaluates the operation of a typical industrial application of a PLC system and its associated control program. (810) Describes and evaluates an application of control engineering, draws a block diagram of the system, indicates and justifies the types and roles of sensors, transducers, actuators, signal conditioning, displays and control program used. (1417)
(04) LO.4 Understand the use of programmable logic controllers in instrumentation and control applications Describes a PLC system and explains its advantages and disadvantages.
(57) Describes a PLC system and explains its advantages, disadvantages and operation and programs it to carry out a single specified task.
10
(04) LO.5 Understand the applications of control engineering Describes an application of control engineering and draws a block diagram of the system, indicating the types of sensors, transducers, actuators and displays.
(57) Describes an application of control engineering, draws a block diagram of the system, indicates the types and roles of sensors, transducers, actuators, signal conditioning, displays and control program used. (813)
10
(07)
17 Total marks 60
Assessment guidance
Using the marking grid Each internally assessed unit has 60 available marks in total. In some units the marking grid has been split into two grids A and B. Marking grid A contains all of the marking criteria for the unit except those which assess a learners performance in practical activities which are recorded as a witness testimony or observation record. These make up grid B. Centres must ensure that learners undertake appropriate assessment tasks to enable them to achieve the requirements of each units marking grid(s). The basic principle is that this is a best fit grid i.e. the assessor must match the overall standard of work for an assessment focus to a band. It is NOT a hurdle approach, whereby the assessor cannot award marks from the next mark band if one item for an assessment focus from a lower mark band has been omitted, regardless of the quality of the rest of the work for that assessment focus. If a learner completes all they are asked to do in a band for an assessment focus, they can be awarded the full marks for that mark band. If a learner has clearly done more on one aspect of work for an assessment focus required by a mark band, the assessor should consider whether the learner can be awarded marks from the bottom of the next mark band. If a learner has completed less than required in any aspect of work for an assessment focus, or indeed omitted an aspect, then the mark moves down within the mark band. Marking is completely separate for each assessment focus i.e. a learner can get mark band 3 on one assessment focus, mark band 1 on another etc, then all marks are added together for the unit total. It may be possible, depending on weighting of an assessment focus for a learner to pass a unit even if 0 has been given in marks for one assessment focus in the unit. A 0 mark should be used only where a learner provides no valid evidence. Any work that starts to address the requirements of the grid should normally be awarded at least one mark. Evidence generated for marking grid A will be moderated. This must be in the form of hard evidence which a moderator can reassess, such as learner produced written documents (e.g. short question answers, multiple choice question answers, materials from presentations, research notes), videos (dated) of practical activities or artefacts. Marks gained from marking grid A will be reported separately from those gained from marking grid B.
Assessment focus LO.1 Mark Band 13 (013 marks) 1 mark can be awarded for describing an analogue signal as one that is continuously variable and 1 mark for describing a digital signal as one that can only exist in one of two discrete levels. Up to 3 marks can be awarded for explaining the need for different types of transmission media. Answers could typically include the use of screened coaxial cables for low-loss, constant impedance connections capable of supporting fast data rates (1 mark), the use of optical fibres for very fast data rates and exceptional noise immunity (1 mark), and the use of short-range wireless links for applications in which physical connections (i.e. those based on wire conductors or optical fibres) are not possible (1 mark). Up to 2 marks can be awarded for an explanation of the methods of connecting and interfacing analogue and digital signals. Typically an answer could include any two of the following, with 1 mark for each explained up to a maximum of 2 marks: (i) the need for level shifting to remove/adjust DC components, (ii) filtering to remove noise and hum, (iii) analogue to digital conversion, (iv) digital to analogue conversion, and (v) multiplexing. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for reference to characteristics and properties of different types of transmission. 1 mark can be awarded for each explanation of the process of signal conversion from analogue to digital (ADC), digital to analogue (DAC), serial to parallel and parallel to serial. In relation to ADC and DAC conversion typically an answer could include any of the following: (i) the use of a binary weighted or R-2R ladder, (ii) comparator-based flash converter, (iii) successive approximation register, (iv) ramp-type converter. In relation to serial to parallel and parallel to serial data conversion, typically an answer could include an explanation of a serial input/parallel output (SIPO) shift register and an explanation of a parallel input/serial output (PISO) shift register. Alternatively, learners could cite the use of a universal shift register with appropriate control logic for changing the mode of operation in order to support serial/parallel load/shift. In either case learners' explanations could be based on an appropriately annotated block diagram in which inputs, outputs, and control signals are clearly labelled.
Assessment focus LO.2 Mark Band 13 (010 marks) 1 mark can be awarded for the description of the instrumentation and control systems and 3 marks for the explanation of the role of digital and analogue sensors, transducers and displays. Typically an answer could include an explanation of the purpose (but not the operation) of the following sensors, transducers and displays, up to a maximum of 3 marks and including any three of the following, awarding 1 mark for each explained: (i) a temperature sensor such as a thermocouple or semiconductor temperature sensor, (ii) a position sensor such as a linear or rotary potentiometer or linear variable differential transducer (LVDT), (iii) an angular speed sensor such as a tachogenerator, (iv) an optical shaft encoder, (v) a moving coil meter, (vi) a liquid crystal display (LCD), (vii) a light emitting diode (LED) display, (viii) an LED bar or sevensegment display, (viii) a cathode ray tube (CRT) display. Note that, for mark band 1 learners are not required to explain the operation of the selected transducers, sensors and displays. Up to 3 marks can be awarded for the explanation of the operation of digital and analogue sensors, transducers and displays in instrumentation and control applications. Typically an answer could include an explanation of the operation of the following sensors, transducers and displays, up to a maximum of 3 marks and including any three of the following, awarding 1 mark for each explained: (i) a temperature sensor such as a thermocouple or semiconductor temperature sensor, (ii) a position sensor such as a linear or rotary potentiometer or linear variable differential transducer (LVDT), (iii) an angular speed sensor such as a tachogenerator, (iv) an optical shaft encoder, (v) a moving coil meter, (vi) a liquid crystal display (LCD), (vii) a light emitting diode (LED) display, (viii) an LED bar or seven-segment display, (viii) a cathode ray tube (CRT) display. Note that, for mark band 2 learners are required to explain the principles of operation of the selected transducers, sensors and displays. Up to 3 marks can be awarded for the evaluation of the instrumentation and control system and explanation of the code conversion and display technology used in the system. Typically an answer could include an evaluation of a position control system, temperature control system or speed control system in relation to the required operating parameters such as accuracy (1 mark), resolution (1 mark) and range (1 mark).
Assessment focus LO.3 Mark Band 13 Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the description of open loop control and up to 2 marks for the description of closed loop control. Learners (010 marks) could produce annotated diagrams for each type of system together with a brief written description of each type of system. Up to 3 marks can be awarded for the explanation of a practical closed loop control system differentiating between negative and positive feedback and feed forward. Typically 1 mark can be awarded for the explanation of system operation (typically mentioning the use of negative feedback and the formation of an error signal) and up to 2 marks for explaining that negative feedback produces an error signal which is the difference between the output (controlled variable) and the input (set point) and thus has the effect of regulating/stabilising the output of a control system by and that positive feedback produces an error signal that is the sum of the output (controlled variable) and the input (set point) and thus produces instability and oscillation. Up to 3 marks can be awarded for an evaluation of the operation of a complete control system that incorporates proportional, integral and derivative control. Typically an answer could include an evaluation of a position control system or speed control system in relation to the required operating parameters such as accuracy, resolution, range, hysteresis, settling time, stability. Assessment focus LO.4 Mark Band 13 Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the description of the PLC system and up to 2 marks for explaining advantages and disadvantages. Typically 2 (010 marks) marks could be awarded for an answer that included a description of some of the system components and 2 marks for an explanation of advantages and disadvantages. Where either the description of the system or the explanation of the advantages and disadvantages are beyond mark band 1 requirements this could go to 3 marks, up to a maximum of 4 marks across mark band 1. 1 mark can be awarded for an explanation of the operation of the system. A typical answer could include an explanation of ladder logic and programming scanning for changes to inputs and outputs. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for developing the program (NB: The proficiency in programming should be taken into account in awarding the marks, with only full marks given when the activity is completed in an efficient and safe manner. It should also demonstrate an appropriate structure and should use correct logic). Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the evaluation of the PLC systems operation and 1 mark for the evaluation of its associated control program. Typically an answer could include an evaluation of a PLC in relation to achieving the desired functionality in terms of input sensing (1 mark) and output control (1 mark). Typically, the evaluation of the control program could make reference to either: structure and control flow, optimisation and/or minimisation.
Assessment focus LO.5 Mark Band 13 Up to 3 marks can be awarded for a correctly laid out block diagram and 4 marks for indicating the types of sensors, transducers, actuators and (017 marks) displays. Typically a block diagram should include inputs, outputs, and where appropriate energy sources, controller, additional signal conditioning. It should show the inclusion of sensors, transducers, actuators and displays. Up to 3 marks can be awarded for a description and inclusion of the signal conditioning and 3 marks for a description of the control program used. Typically a description of signal conditioning might include, up to a maximum of 3 marks and including any three of the following, awarding 1 mark for each described: (i) amplification, (ii) filtering, (iii) DC level shifting, (iv) analogue to digital conversion (ADC), (v) digital to analogue conversion (DAC), (vi) noise reduction, (vii) attenuation, (viii) code conversion. Typically a description of the control program might include, up to a maximum of 3 mark and including any three of the following, awarding 1 mark for each described: (i) program initialisation, (ii) scanning and/or polling, (iii) reading data/controls, (iv) processing, (v) updating displays, (vi) data storage. Up to 2 marks should be awarded for the evaluation of the application of control engineering and 2 marks for the justification of the choice of components (including sensors, transducers, actuators, signal conditioning, displays and the control program used). Typically an answer could include an evaluation of a control system in relation to achieving the desired functionality in terms of meeting the desired specification (1 mark) and the overall functionality achieved (1 mark). Typically, the justification of the choice of components could make reference to, up to a maximum of 2 marks and any two of the following, awarding 1 mark for each justification: (i) speed of operation, (ii) accuracy, (iii) stability, (iv) repeatability, (v) energy and efficiency.
Approaches to assessment
In all cases the mark band descriptions are intended to be progressive from mark band 1 to mark band 3, indicating a more complete understanding of the subject, hence the tasks should be designed with this in mind. Learners attempting mark band 3 should have the opportunity of gathering the marks for mark band 1 and mark band 2. It is most likely that there will be a number of separate tasks that provide learners with the opportunity to achieve each of the assessment foci, an overall assignment with five tasks would be appropriate for this unit. Task 1 could cover assessment focus 1 and could be based on an investigation of signals and transmission media used in a typical instrumentation or control system. For example, learners could investigate a system in which one or more remote analogue temperature sensors are used to collect data and then transmit this in digital form using a serial data connection to a microcontroller or monitoring computer system. This would allow learners to investigate the operation of analogue to digital converters (ADC) as well as the operation of a serial data link (e.g. RS-232) and the use of multiplexing and signal conditioning circuitry. As the outcomes from this task are likely to be of a written nature the evidence should be submitted in the form of a report. Task 2 could cover assessment focus 2 and involve an investigation of a variety of different types of sensor, transducer and display and their role within typical instrumentation and control systems. Typical systems could be based on position control, temperature control or speed control and could be based on analogue, digital and mixed (analogue/digital) technology. Again, as the outcomes from this task are likely to be of a written nature the evidence should be submitted in the form of a report. Task 3 could cover assessment focus 4.3 and could be based on an investigation of open and closed loop control systems including an observation and quantitative measurement of parameters such as resolution, accuracy, settling time, hysteresis, overshoot, undershoot (etc). Learners should be given the opportunity to change system parameters (such as closedloop gain, feedback ratio, etc) and to measure and observe the results on system behaviour. Again, as the outcomes from this task are likely to be of a written nature the evidence should be submitted in the form of a report. Task 4 could cover assessment focus 4 and could be based on a PLC system with a limited number of inputs and outputs for controlling a simple industrial process (such as a simple conveyor system). The task should include activities that could be based on the use of simulation software or the use of a software program which could be downloaded to the PLC. Alternatively, a hand-held programmer could be used for program entry, debugging and modification. In all cases the task should be realistic, with input sensors and output displays or actuators and an appropriate degree of complexity. Some of the outcomes from this task are likely to be of a written nature and, together with the evidence to support the programming carried out for mark band 2, evidence should be submitted in the form of a process portfolio. Task 5 could cover assessment focus 5 and could be based on a detailed investigation of a complete application of a control engineering system. This might be based on an engine management system, automatic braking system (ABS), guidance system, armament firing system, process control system, power generation system, plant/process control system, robot manufacturing cell, robot handling system, industrial conveyor system, computer numerical control (CNC) system. Again, as the outcomes from this task are likely to be of a written nature the evidence should be submitted in the form of a report, this would obviously need to include the block diagrams.
In learning outcome 4 learners should be introduced to the basic concept of the PLC and also to some possible alternatives, e.g. PICs and microcontrollers, and understand the relative advantages and disadvantages of each. They should experience programming a PLC to carry out some control functions, as used in industry. This could link to the section on sensors and actuators, with the inputs connected to sensors and the outputs driving actuators. The use of simulation software would be of advantage. The investigation of a real control system for assessment focus 5 should bring together most of the elements of this unit. Examples might include engine management systems, automatic braking systems (ABS), guidance systems, armament firing systems, process control systems, power generation systems, plant/process control systems, robot manufacturing cells, robot handling systems, industrial conveyor systems, computer numerical control (CNC) systems. Regardless of the system(s) chosen for investigation, an emphasis should be placed on the use of current and future technology. To satisfy this requirement, learners should be encouraged to explore the future possibilities and applications of automation and control technology and tutors should ensure that learners are provided with appropriate guidance and access to relevant information sources.
Guidance for Integrating Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Level 3
Skills in applied learning A unique and central feature of Principal Learning (PL) is the requirement that at least 50% must be completed in an applied or work-related context. This means that learners must actively engage with the curriculum they are studying, putting theory into practice and working cooperatively with other learners, with their teachers, and with people from outside the classroom. They should learn in a range of contexts and environments, carrying out investigations and active enquiries, learning through doing and relating their learning to job roles. The skills embodied in the three Essential Skills Wales (ESW) and the three wider key skills (WKS) are therefore integral to the delivery of Principal Learning (PL) at all levels and in all lines of learning. Principal Learning offers many opportunities to develop all six skills (ESW + WKS) that are required if a candidate is to achieve the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ). To achieve the WBQ at Advanced level, learners must achieve three of the six skills at Level 3, one of which must be ESW Communication, Application of Number or ICT, together with the other three skills at Level 2 Developing skills The table below lists, in the first column, the skills that a learner must develop for the ESW or WKS in question. The second column suggests a PL context in which the skill would arise naturally and might be developed. It is important that, when developing an ESW skill, both the learner and the teacher pay close attention to the section in the standards headed In order to show that you are competent. Similarly for the WKS, teachers and learners must study Part A. The third column in the table identifies the ESW or WKS component. Portfolio evidence If a learner is aiming to generate portfolio evidence in the context of a learning activity or assignment in PL, it is important to ensure that the requirements of the assignment match the evidence requirements of the skill qualification (ESW or WKS) in question, in terms of content and of presentation. A portfolio of evidence will often require more than one example of the skill, so teachers will need to identify other contexts and opportunities from the many that exist in the context of the WBQ as a whole. The table below does not include details of these requirements. It is therefore essential that teachers are familiar with: the standards for ESW and the associated documents Amplification of Evidence Requirements (which includes guidance), and Mandatory Definitions, which are available from http://old.accac.org.uk/eng/content.php?mID=752 the standards for the wider key skills and the associated document The key skills qualifications and guidance: working with others, improving own learning and performance and problem solving levels 1-4 2004 (QCA 2004); order ref QCA/04/1294, downloadable from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_6462.aspx .
It is important to emphasise that candidates may develop these skills and/or generate portfolio evidence from anywhere in their learning programme. It is therefore not necessary, nor expected, that any one unit of Principal Learning should offer development and/or evidence opportunities for all the components of each of the six skills. Where opportunities to develop these skills and to provide portfolio evidence arise naturally in learning contexts, they should be pursued; learning and assignments should not be distorted to include the skills where they do not arise naturally. Essential Skills Wales Communication The ESW standards aim to integrate the different aspects of communication (speaking and listening, reading and writing) and emphasise that communication should be purposeful. So, for example, the purpose of reading might be to inform discussion and/or writing, or a discussion might be part of a candidates preparation for a piece of writing, all in relation to the purpose of the Principal Learning unit. Application of Number The ESW standards emphasise that numbers must be applied and used for the purpose of tackling a problem or task. At Level 3, the standards are structured round the following process: Understand and tackle a problem calculations Check results Reflect/review. Collect and interpret data Carry out Interpret results Present findings
The problem should arise naturally in the context of the candidates work for the Principal Learning unit. For portfolio evidence at this level, the candidate must carry out at least one activity that shows their skills in the process as a whole, ie covering all three components of the unit. ICT As with Application of Number, the ESW standards emphasise the importance of using ICT in context and for a purpose. The Amplification of evidence requirements specifically states that You must demonstrate your ICT skills in the context of these activities; demonstrating your skills in isolation cannot be used as evidence. Also similarly to Application of Number, the learner, while developing their ICT skills, is likely to focus on parts of the process and on specific skills, but they should always have the big picture in mind and build towards seeing the process as a whole. For the portfolio, the Amplification states that: You must carry out at least two activities that, overall: show that you can plan and carry through a number of different activities, one of which must be a complex activity covering ICT3.1, ICT3.2 and ICT3.3. While much of the portfolio evidence may be presented electronically and/or as printouts, it is essential that it shows the processes the candidate used to confirm their understanding of their task, to select, enter and develop information, and to present their work. This will normally involve drafting, revising, correcting, redrafting or reformatting the work. This is therefore an important aspect of developing ESW ICT, and the evidence submitted for assessment must include at least one complete draft with notes, annotations, highlighting, alterations etc. The final printouts, presentations etc are not, on their own, sufficient as evidence, though they must be included in the portfolio.
The wider key skills All three of the wider key skills require the candidate to learn and to demonstrate the process skills of: Planning Doing Reviewing.
Each component of this process can be learned and developed separately, though portfolio evidence must cover all three components of the qualification in a single activity. Working with Others at Level 3 requires that the example in the portfolio shows that the learner can work as part of a group or team made up of at least three people (i.e. the learner works with at least two other people). The learner must become conscious of and focus on their own skills and how they relate to others if they are to develop their ability to contribute effectively to a team project or activity. They must be able to review their work with others, identify factors that influenced the outcome and agree how to improve their teamworking skills for the future. The evidence in a candidates portfolio must show their individual contribution to the work of the group. Problem Solving is a skill that many younger learners do not at first recognise as a skill that, like other skills, involves learning and developing specialised techniques. The learner has to identify and analyse a problem (which must be individual to them, not a group activity), come up with different ways of tackling it and choose one, make a plan, follow it, and check whether the problem has been solved. They must then review their approach to problem solving. As with Working with Others, each phase can be focused on separately in the learning and development phase, but the portfolio requires two examples, each of which follows though all three components of the qualification. Improving Own Learning and Performance, like the other wider key skills, requires the learner to become consciously aware of how they learn and which ways of learning are most effective for them in different situations. Many learners will have used only one or two ways of learning hitherto and need to be introduced to other possibilities. They must take responsibility for improving their learning and performance, set targets for what they want to learn or do, make a plan with targets, follow the plan, reflect on and review their progress, establish what they have achieved, and agree ways to further improve their performance. Any of the learning outcomes in the Principal Learning unit could provide opportunities to develop IOLP skills, but SMART targets must be set that relate to the purpose of the unit. The portfolio of evidence must include at least one example that covers at least three targets. Overall, the evidence must show at least two different ways of learning.
Suggested context
Speaking to communicate
C3.1.2
information feelings opinions questions complex instructions on a range of familiar and unfamiliar topics, using appropriate language and non-verbal communication, and in a range of contexts.
(a) Taking part in formal discussions with two or more other people (b) Giving a talk/presentation of at least eight minutes.
C3.1.3
Reading
Reading, understanding and synthesising information from at least two documents about the same subject. Each document must be at least 1,000 words long. At least one must contain complex information or reasoning and at least one must contain an image Research information concerning on the principles and differences between open and closed loop control systems from at least two documents. Synthesis this information as part of the talk/presentation.
C3.2 C3.2.1
Writing
Writing two documents of different types, each one giving different information to different audiences about complex subjects in appropriate formats and using language that is appropriate to purpose and audience. One document must be at least 1,000 words long. Produce a handout on open and closed loop control systems to accompany the talk/presentation. Produce a guide to sensors, transducers and instrumentation displays.
C3.3 C3.3.1
Suggested context
ICT3.1.2 ICT3.1.3
Following safe, healthy and secure working practices at all times. Finding, selecting and exchanging information Planning how to find the ICT-based and non ICT-based information required. Searching for, evaluating, selecting and getting, from a range of sources, relevant ICT-based and non ICTbased information. Entering, saving, communicating and exchanging ICT-based information to suit the purpose. Developing and presenting information Organising, developing, formatting and combining ICT-based and non ICT-based information from different sources to suit content and purpose, in the form of: a) text b) tables c) images d) numbers e) records. Presenting the final output effectively, using a consistent style and formats and layouts that are appropriate to purpose and audience, using ICT, and reviewing the work.
Use ICT to present combined, organised and formatted ICT and non ICT information, including text, tables, images numbers and records in a presentation and handout on analogue and digital signals in instrumentation and control systems. Review work. Plan, search for, select and evaluate ICT based and non ICT based sources concerning analogue and digital signals in instrumentation and control systems. Enter, save, communicate and exchange the information to inform a presentation.
ICT3.2 ICT3.2.1
ICT3.1.2
ICT3.1.3
ICT3.3 ICT3.3.1
ICT3.3.2
Suggested context
N3.1.2 N3.1.3
N3.2 N3.2.1
Using the data and information obtained to carry out calculations relevant to the task to do with: m) amounts or sizes n) scales or proportion o) handling statistics p) using formulae Interpreting results and presenting findings Selecting and justifying two different ways to present results, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams appropriate to audience. Presenting and explaining methods and findings and justifying how they meet the purpose of the task and are appropriate to the audience.
Limited opportunities.
N3.2.2
N3.3 N3.3.1
N3.3.2
Suggested context
Group members should carry out their individual responsibilities, checking progress and collaborating effectively to produce the presentation.
WO3.2
WO3.3
Suggested context
Following discussion with a teacher, prepare a learning plan to investigate an application of control engineering.
Reference LP3.1
LP3.1.1
LP3.1.2 LP3.1.3
LP3.2
LP3.2.1
LP3.2.2
LP3.2.3
LP3.3
LP3.3.1
LP3.3.2 LP3.3.3
Exploring a problem and identifying Identify and compare ways of tackling the problem of investigating a complete different ways of tackling it Identifying, analysing and accurately describing the problem, and agreeing with others how to know it has been solved Selecting and using a variety of methods to come up with different ways of tackling the problem Comparing the main features and risks of each approach, and justifying the method to be used. Planning and implementing at least one way of solving the problem Planning the chosen way of solving the problem and getting the go-ahead from an appropriate person Putting the plan into action, effectively using support and feedback from others to help tackle the problem Checking regularly progress towards solving the problem, revising the approach as necessary. Checking if the problem has been solved and reviewing own approach to problem solving Applying systematically methods agreed with an appropriate person, to check if the problem has been solved Describing fully the results and drawing conclusions on how successful the learner was in solving the problem Reviewing own approach to problem solving, including whether other approaches might have proved more effective.
Upon completion of the investigation, produce evidence to show if the problem has been solved, identify what has gone well and how problem-solving skills might be improved upon in the future. Choose, plan and carry out one way of investigating a complete application of a control engineering system, using support when necessary. application of a control engineering system.
PS3.1.2
PS3.1.3
PS3.2 PS3.2.1
PS3.2.2
PS3.2.3
PS3.3
PS3.3.1
PS3.3.2
PS3.3.3
Work experience This unit would benefit from work experience in a number of industries which use instrumentation and control. If work experience were not possible in these industries it would be beneficial to include industrial visits.
Specialist resources Centres will need to provide learners with access to the following resources: control simulation software electronics simulation software PLCs and programming software examples of open loop, closed loop and PID control systems various sensors, transducers and actuators analogue and digital instruments and displays examples of industrial and domestic control systems.
Reference material Bolton W Instrumentation and Control Systems (Newnes, 2004) ISBN 0750664320 Bolton W Programmable Logic Controllers (Elsevier, 2006) ISBN 9780750681124 Parr E Programmable Controllers an Engineers Guide (Newnes, 2003) ISBN 9780750657570 Sinclair I Sensors and Transducers (Newnes, 2000) ISBN 9780750649322 Tooley M PC Based Instrumentation and Control (Elsevier, 2005) ISBN 9780750620932
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 101
Learning outcomes
On completion of this unit, a learner should: LO.1. Know about the cost of maintenance and the consequences of plant, equipment or system failure including the effects on production LO.2. Be able to deploy effective maintenance strategies when planning a maintenance activity LO.3. Know how the data gathered from monitoring the performance and condition of engineering plant, equipment or system can be used LO.4. Be able to carry out a risk assessment and follow a maintenance plan using documentation for a maintenance activity on a closed loop engineering system.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 102
LO.2
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 103
LO.3
Know how the data gathered from monitoring the performance and condition of engineering plant, equipment or system can be used
Learners will need to consider monitoring techniques such as condition monitoring, scheduled overhauls, routine servicing, planning systems, hazard studies, failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), self-diagnostic and computerised systems. Learners will need to examine how data is collected from identified points. In doing so they will find out about data, e.g. types, operational characteristics, output quality, throughput, environmental operating conditions; and how to interpret data, e.g. electronic-based data, data recording and presentation. Learners will also discover the need for monitoring considering physical aspects, e.g. improve safety, reduce environmental hazards, extended equipment life; and cost related aspects, e.g. improve product quality, reduce downtime, reduce costs; and other aspects, e.g. comprehensive computer database, better communications. Learners will need to follow a maintenance plan that will include a risk assessment (such as the five steps including principal hazards, who is likely to be injured/harmed, evaluate the risks and decide on adequacy of precautions, recording findings, review assessment) and other relevant safety conditions, e.g. COSHH, safe access and working arrangements for the maintenance area, isolation requirements for plant/equipment, disposal of waste, hand-over procedures, liaison with other departments. The supporting documentation that learners use will include as appropriate, manufacturers drawings and maintenance documentation, e.g. maintenance logs, data bases, records, results and defect reports, plans and schedules, production records, standing instructions, hand over documentation. Learners will carry out the maintenance activity on a closed loop engineering system such as process monitoring and control, e.g. mechanical, fluid power, electrical, process control, automotive system, chemical production system, environmental systems (fume extraction or air conditioning), machine tool, lifting and handling equipment, process control valves, company specific equipment, electrical plant, motors starters, switchgear and distribution panels. The maintenance activities should be appropriate to the closed loop system being maintained, e.g. visual examination, monitoring, replacement, sensory, testing, checking alignment, making routine adjustment, removing excess dirt and grime, recording results and reporting defects.
LO.4. Be able to carry out a risk assessment and follow a maintenance plan using documentation for a maintenance activity on a closed loop engineering system
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 104
LO.2
LO.3
Know how the data gathered from monitoring the performance and condition of engineering plant, equipment or system can be used
LO.4
Be able to carry out a risk assessment and follow a maintenance plan using documentation for a maintenance activity on a closed loop engineering system
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 105
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 106
Marking grid A
Assessment focus Mark Band 1 Describes the consequences of failure for given plant, equipment or a system and describes the effects on production. Mark Band 2 Describes the consequences of failure for given plant, equipment or a system, describes the effects on production and explains the effect on customer expectation and corporate image. Mark Band 3 Describes the consequences of failure for given plant, equipment or a system, describes the effects on production, explains the effect on customer expectation and corporate image and compares two consequences of plant, equipment or system failure for their effect on corporate image. (89) Describes how the costs of maintenance are represented for given plant, equipment or a system and describes the benefits of keeping accurate cost records of maintenance including a justification for the use of the records in a maintenance environment. (67) Describes two given types of maintenance strategies and describes how one would be used then justifies why it would be used for given plant, equipment or a system. (78) 8 7 9 Maximum marks available
LO.1.1 Know about the consequences of plant, equipment or system failure and the effects on production
(04)
(57) Describes how the costs of maintenance are represented for given plant, equipment or a system and describes the benefits of keeping accurate cost records of maintenance.
Describes how the costs of maintenance are represented for given plant, equipment or a system.
(03)
(45) Describes two given types of maintenance strategies and describes how one would be used for given plant, equipment or a system. (56)
(04)
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 107
Mark Band 1 Develops a maintenance plan and uses two appropriate methods to present the plan for a given type of maintenance strategy.
Mark Band 2 Develops a maintenance plan and uses two appropriate methods to present the plan for a given type of maintenance strategy and explains how the methods used to present a maintenance plan help deploy a maintenance strategy.
Mark Band 3 Develops a maintenance plan and uses two appropriate methods to present the plan for a given type of maintenance strategy, explains how the methods used to present a maintenance plan help deploy a maintenance strategy, justifies a maintenance plan and considers an alternative approach to improve the deployment of a maintenance strategy. (78) Describes how data would be collected and interpreted and uses data from a given monitoring technique to review and then justify the use of this data to help improve the performance and condition of engineering plant, equipment or a system. (1114)
(04) LO.3 Know how the data gathered from monitoring the performance and condition of engineering plant, equipment or system can be used For a given monitoring technique describes how data would be collected and interpreted when considering physical, cost related, and other aspects.
(56) Describes how data would be collected and interpreted and uses data from a given monitoring technique to review physical, cost related, and other aspects that show the performance and condition of engineering plant, equipment or a system. (710)
(06)
14
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 108
Marking grid B
Assessment focus LO.4 Be able to carry out a risk assessment and follow a maintenance plan using documentation for a maintenance activity on a closed loop engineering system Mark Band 1 Completes a risk assessment, then follows a given maintenance plan and uses supporting documentation to carry out, with guidance, appropriate maintenance activities on a closed loop engineering system. Mark Band 2 Completes a risk assessment, then follows a given maintenance plan deploying other relevant safety conditions and uses supporting documentation to carry out, with limited guidance, appropriate maintenance activities on a closed loop engineering system. Mark Band 3 Completes and evaluates a risk assessment, then follows a given maintenance plan deploying other relevant safety conditions and effectively uses supporting documentation to carry out, independently, appropriate maintenance activities on a closed loop engineering system. Maximum marks available
(06)
(710)
(1114)
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 109
Assessment guidance
Using the marking grid Each internally assessed unit has 60 available marks in total. In some units the marking grid has been split into two grids A and B. Marking grid A contains all of the marking criteria for the unit except those which assess a learners performance in practical activities which are recorded as a witness testimony or observation record. These make up grid B. Centres must ensure that learners undertake appropriate assessment tasks to enable them to achieve the requirements of each units marking grid(s). The basic principle is that this is a best fit grid i.e. the assessor must match the overall standard of work for an assessment focus to a band. It is NOT a hurdle approach, whereby the assessor cannot award marks from the next mark band if one item for an assessment focus from a lower mark band has been omitted, regardless of the quality of the rest of the work for that assessment focus. If a learner completes all they are asked to do in a band for an assessment focus, they can be awarded the full marks for that mark band. If a learner has clearly done more on one aspect of work for an assessment focus required by a mark band, the assessor should consider whether the learner can be awarded marks from the bottom of the next mark band. If a learner has completed less than required in any aspect of work for an assessment focus, or indeed omitted an aspect, then the mark moves down within the mark band. Marking is completely separate for each assessment focus i.e. a learner can get mark band 3 on one assessment focus, mark band 1 on another etc, then all marks are added together for the unit total. It may be possible, depending on weighting of an assessment focus for a learner to pass a unit even if 0 has been given in marks for one assessment focus in the unit. A 0 mark should be used only where a learner provides no valid evidence. Any work that starts to address the requirements of the grid should normally be awarded at least one mark. Evidence generated for marking grid A will be moderated. This must be in the form of hard evidence which a moderator can reassess, such as learner produced written documents (e.g. short question answers, multiple choice question answers, materials from presentations, research notes), videos (dated) of practical activities or artefacts. Marks gained from marking grid A will be reported separately from those gained from marking grid B.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 110
Assessment focus LO.1.2 Mark Band 13 (07 marks) Up to 3 marks can be awarded for describing how the costs are represented based on its ability to show the link between cost and maintenance. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the description based on the appropriateness of the benefits of keeping records. The justification should indicate why records are appropriate; this could be in the form of advantages and limitations. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the justification given based on its clarity and ability to show advantages and/or limitations.
Assessment focus LO.2.1 Mark Band 13 There are typically up to 2 marks for each of the two descriptions, but could go to 3 if one aspect is answered well and above that required for (08 marks) this mark, up to a maximum of 4 marks. The marks given should be based on the detail given to show what each type of maintenance strategy is. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the description of how a maintenance strategy would be used based on the detail given. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the justification given based on its clarity and ability to show advantages and/or limitations.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 111
Assessment focus LO.2.2 Mark Band 13 A maintenance plan is likely to have the following aspects present: safe (08 marks) working procedures, permit to work, spares lists, skills levels, sub contract, equipment, tools, manuals, materials, components, sequence and timing, frequency, check lists. A maintenance plan should have a range of these present for the given activity. 1 mark can be awarded for every two of these aspects present, based on their suitability and detail against the given activity, up to a total of 2 marks. If more are present the maximum mark for the plan is still 2. The plan also has to be presented, this can be achieved by any of the following methods: Gantt charts, maintenance logs, job cards, data bases, records, reports, production records, standing instructions, handover procedures, computerised methods. 1 mark can be awarded for every two of these methods used, based on their suitability and detail against the given activity, up to a total of 2 marks. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the explanation given based on the detail included to show how methods of presentation can influence the successful deployment of a maintenance strategy and about the visibility of the information shown. 1 mark can be awarded for justifying its use to include how the maintenance plan is able to be followed and gives limitations and benefits in its use. One mark can be awarded for giving ideas about how it could be improved when used for a particular maintenance strategy.
Assessment focus LO.3 Mark Band 13 Typically, up to 3 marks can be awarded for each description of both (014 marks) collection and interpretation of data based on the consideration of physical aspects, cost related aspects and other aspects in each case. If either area of collection or interpretation is answered well and beyond that required for mark band 1, 4 marks could be awarded up to a maximum of 6 marks. Marks can be awarded when the learner uses data from the monitoring technique to review (i) the performance of the engineering plant, equipment or system and (ii) the condition of the engineering plant, equipment or system. There are typically up to 2 marks for each of the two aspects of the response but could go to 3 if one aspect is answered well and above that required for mark band 2 but up to a maximum of 4 marks. Marks can be awarded when the learner justifies the use of data used to help monitoring techniques to help improve (i) the performance and (ii) the condition of the engineering plant, this could be in the form of advantages and limitations. There are typically up to 2 marks for each of the two aspects of the response.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 112
Marking grid B Assessment focus LO.4 Mark Band 13 If the risk assessment produced is of a basic nature, up to 2 marks can (014 marks) be awarded. A basic risk assessment is likely to have four of the five steps completed in a simplistic way. A more comprehensive risk assessment can be awarded up to 3 marks and will have all five steps completed. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the evaluation of the risk assessment. One mark can be awarded for using relevant supporting documentation, apart from the maintenance plan and another mark should be awarded when it is effectively used, which will mean the links made and usefulness, when using this documentation, are very clear. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for relevant safety conditions followed. Up to 3 marks can be awarded for the maintenance activity carried out with guidance and based on how well it follows the plan and supporting documentation. In all cases the learner has to be guided and advised throughout to ensure that progress is made. The learner relies on the support of the tutor, who has to assist in most aspects of the work. Up to 4 marks can be awarded for the maintenance activity carried out with limited guidance and based on how well it follows the plan and supporting documentation. The tutor supports the learner initially in carrying out the risk assessment, following relevant safety conditions and carrying out the maintenance activity. Thereafter the tutor reacts to questions from the learner and suggests a range of ideas/activities that the learner acts on. The learner frequently checks matters of detail. The tutor needs to assist in some aspects of the work. Up to 5 marks can be awarded for the maintenance activity carried out independently and based on how well it follows the plan and supporting documentation. The tutor supports the learner initially in carrying out the risk assessment, following relevant safety conditions and carrying out the maintenance activity. Thereafter the tutor occasionally assists the learner, and only when asked, but monitors progress throughout.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 113
Approaches to assessment
Progression across the mark bands will be achieved when learners cover the requirements of each assessment focus in more detail. Assessment foci 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 3 and 4 provide opportunities for learners to progress across the mark bands by applying their knowledge and skills in a more analytical manner. Learners will need to meet the requirements of each mark band as they progress through the set tasks. Assessment focus 2.2 will need individual activities for each level of performance, indicated by each part within each mark band. In order to reflect the applied nature of the qualification, a greater weighting of marks in this unit has been allocated to assessment foci 3 and 4. These provide opportunities for learners to apply their knowledge and understanding to practical, problem solving activities, with guidance, with limited guidance or independently. Assessment evidence for this unit could typically consist of an assignment containing three tasks, although these do not have to be taken separately. This unit should be assessed by short tasks taken under supervised conditions, in suitable teaching sessions. Task 1 will require evidence in the form of a report. It could cover the requirements of assessment foci 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1. It may be appropriate to administer this task over two or three hours. The centre has freedom of choice with regards to plant, equipment or system used for the task, although it would depend on the experience that learners have had during the delivery of this unit (see delivery guidance). For assessment focus 1.1 written activities will need to be set asking for descriptions of consequences of failure, effects on production, an explanation of how the effects on production effect customer expectations and corporate image, and a comparison of the consequences of plant, equipment or system failure for their affect on corporate image. Further written activities for assessment focus 1.2, to describe how the costs are represented and the benefits of keeping accurate cost records and to justify the use of those records could be given. Finally, to give opportunities to achieve assessment focus 2.1 a further set of written activities should be given that ask the learner to describe two given types of maintenance strategies, different learners could be given different strategies from those listed in the what you need to cover section, and describe how one would be used for a particular plant, equipment or system and justify its use. If it was necessary for a learner to retake this task, different plant, equipment or system should be given for assessment focus 1.1 and 1.2 and different types of maintenance strategies for assessment focus 2.1. Task 2 will require evidence in the form of a process portfolio. This second task could cover assessment foci 2.2 and 4 as a practical task and as such may have to be controlled over more than one teaching session. It may be appropriate to administer this task over five or six hours. Learners will need to be given a maintenance activity to plan and carry out. The task should ensure through the planning of the activity that at least four of the range of features found in a maintenance plan will be needed and at least two methods of presentation of maintenance plans will be needed. Once the plan is completed learners need to be prepare a risk assessment for the activity and use supporting documentation other than the plan itself and the risk assessment. The activity(s) may have to be explicit about this otherwise the full range of marks may not be possible.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 114
Assessment foci 2.2 and 4 will require practical work and as such may need a witness statement/observation record supplemented by annotated photographs and diagrams as well as annotation on the given maintenance activity and other documentation. This evidence should clearly state the level of support given to the learner and be detailed enough for the assessor to judge whether the response falls into mark band 1, 2 or 3. The risk assessment for assessment focus 4 will obviously be supporting product type evidence. Further written activities will be required whereby the learner is asked to explain the methods used to present their maintenance plan, justify the plan and consider an alternative for assessment focus 2.2. Another written activity following the practical work should ask the learner to evaluate the risk assessment for assessment focus 4. If it is necessary for a learner to retake this task, a different type of maintenance strategy for assessment focus 2.2 and a different maintenance plan for assessment focus 4 is required. There is also an opportunity to supply different supporting documentation for assessment focus 4. Task 3 could cover assessment focus 3 and will require evidence in the form of a process portfolio. The task will require a mixture of practical and written activities and as such it may be appropriate to administer this task over two or three hours. Learners should be given an activity to describe how data would be collected and interpreted. They must be given an opportunity to consider the range of physical, cost and other related aspects as required by mark band 1. They should then be asked to use some data to review a monitoring technique for these aspects to show both performance and condition of either plant, equipment or a system. A final activity needs learners to reflect on the use of this data and justify the use of the data to help make improvements to the performance and condition of engineering plant, equipment or a system. If it was necessary for a learner to retake this task, a different monitoring technique should be given for assessment focus 3. The approach outlined above would allow these tasks to be carried out on a work experience placement provided the right organisation could be found. In this case the centre staff will need to brief the company staff and engineers very carefully about the unit requirements. It is important to remember that often an employer will want a different form of evidence. This may be in the form of a paper or a briefing note or a formally structured report. In supporting an employer the diverse range of forms of evidence should be taken into consideration. In these cases witness statements, annotated photographs and video recordings of what the learner did will be vital. In task 2, the maintenance activity could be real and supplied by the company.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 115
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 116
Opportunities should be taken throughout the delivery of this unit to highlight the health and safety requirements of the last learning outcome. It is important that learners are made aware of the correct use of risk assessments and other safety issues relevant to maintenance activities. It is important to cover the safety issues that are likely to be required for any maintenance activity that will be carried out during the delivery and assessment of this unit. The use of industrial visits or a visiting engineer would develop learners knowledge of the consequences of failure, the affects of poor maintenance, collection and use of data and health and safety requirements. Whilst some of the learning outcomes require knowledge of maintenance, the approach of utilising industry and their current practices will give a very practical nature to the delivery throughout the unit. The use of the internet to research the health and safety requirements and risk assessments is something that learners might find rewarding. In a classroom situation, motivational practices such as setting up a competition on who can identify the most health and safety requirements that a maintenance engineer is likely to come into contact with, might also enliven delivery.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 117
Guidance for Integrating Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Level 3
Skills in applied learning A unique and central feature of Principal Learning (PL) is the requirement that at least 50% must be completed in an applied or work-related context. This means that learners must actively engage with the curriculum they are studying, putting theory into practice and working cooperatively with other learners, with their teachers, and with people from outside the classroom. They should learn in a range of contexts and environments, carrying out investigations and active enquiries, learning through doing and relating their learning to job roles. The skills embodied in the three Essential Skills Wales (ESW) and the three wider key skills (WKS) are therefore integral to the delivery of Principal Learning (PL) at all levels and in all lines of learning. Principal Learning offers many opportunities to develop all six skills (ESW + WKS) that are required if a candidate is to achieve the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ). To achieve the WBQ at Advanced level, learners must achieve three of the six skills at Level 3, one of which must be ESW Communication, Application of Number or ICT, together with the other three skills at Level 2 Developing skills The table below lists, in the first column, the skills that a learner must develop for the ESW or WKS in question. The second column suggests a PL context in which the skill would arise naturally and might be developed. It is important that, when developing an ESW skill, both the learner and the teacher pay close attention to the section in the standards headed In order to show that you are competent. Similarly for the WKS, teachers and learners must study Part A. The third column in the table identifies the ESW or WKS component. Portfolio evidence If a learner is aiming to generate portfolio evidence in the context of a learning activity or assignment in PL, it is important to ensure that the requirements of the assignment match the evidence requirements of the skill qualification (ESW or WKS) in question, in terms of content and of presentation. A portfolio of evidence will often require more than one example of the skill, so teachers will need to identify other contexts and opportunities from the many that exist in the context of the WBQ as a whole. The table below does not include details of these requirements. It is therefore essential that teachers are familiar with: the standards for ESW and the associated documents Amplification of Evidence Requirements (which includes guidance), and Mandatory Definitions, which are available from http://old.accac.org.uk/eng/content.php?mID=752 the standards for the wider key skills and the associated document The key skills qualifications and guidance: working with others, improving own learning and performance and problem solving levels 1-4 2004 (QCA 2004); order ref QCA/04/1294, downloadable from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_6462.aspx .
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 118
It is important to emphasise that candidates may develop these skills and/or generate portfolio evidence from anywhere in their learning programme. It is therefore not necessary, nor expected, that any one unit of Principal Learning should offer development and/or evidence opportunities for all the components of each of the six skills. Where opportunities to develop these skills and to provide portfolio evidence arise naturally in learning contexts, they should be pursued; learning and assignments should not be distorted to include the skills where they do not arise naturally. Essential Skills Wales Communication The ESW standards aim to integrate the different aspects of communication (speaking and listening, reading and writing) and emphasise that communication should be purposeful. So, for example, the purpose of reading might be to inform discussion and/or writing, or a discussion might be part of a candidates preparation for a piece of writing, all in relation to the purpose of the Principal Learning unit. Application of Number The ESW standards emphasise that numbers must be applied and used for the purpose of tackling a problem or task. At Level 3, the standards are structured round the following process: Understand and tackle a problem Collect and interpret data Carry out calculations Check results Interpret results Present findings Reflect/review.
The problem should arise naturally in the context of the candidates work for the Principal Learning unit. For portfolio evidence at this level, the candidate must carry out at least one activity that shows their skills in the process as a whole, ie covering all three components of the unit. ICT As with Application of Number, the ESW standards emphasise the importance of using ICT in context and for a purpose. The Amplification of evidence requirements specifically states that You must demonstrate your ICT skills in the context of these activities; demonstrating your skills in isolation cannot be used as evidence. Also similarly to Application of Number, the learner, while developing their ICT skills, is likely to focus on parts of the process and on specific skills, but they should always have the big picture in mind and build towards seeing the process as a whole. For the portfolio, the Amplification states that: You must carry out at least two activities that, overall: show that you can plan and carry through a number of different activities, one of which must be a complex activity covering ICT3.1, ICT3.2 and ICT3.3. While much of the portfolio evidence may be presented electronically and/or as printouts, it is essential that it shows the processes the candidate used to confirm their understanding of their task, to select, enter and develop information, and to present their work. This will normally involve drafting, revising, correcting, redrafting or reformatting the work. This is therefore an important aspect of developing ESW ICT, and the evidence submitted for assessment must include at least one complete draft with notes, annotations, highlighting, alterations etc. The final printouts, presentations etc are not, on their own, sufficient as evidence, though they must be included in the portfolio.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 119
The wider key skills All three of the wider key skills require the candidate to learn and to demonstrate the process skills of: Planning Doing Reviewing.
Each component of this process can be learned and developed separately, though portfolio evidence must cover all three components of the qualification in a single activity. Working with Others at Level 3 requires that the example in the portfolio shows that the learner can work as part of a group or team made up of at least three people (i.e. the learner works with at least two other people). The learner must become conscious of and focus on their own skills and how they relate to others if they are to develop their ability to contribute effectively to a team project or activity. They must be able to review their work with others, identify factors that influenced the outcome and agree how to improve their teamworking skills for the future. The evidence in a candidates portfolio must show their individual contribution to the work of the group. Problem Solving is a skill that many younger learners do not at first recognise as a skill that, like other skills, involves learning and developing specialised techniques. The learner has to identify and analyse a problem (which must be individual to them, not a group activity), come up with different ways of tackling it and choose one, make a plan, follow it, and check whether the problem has been solved. They must then review their approach to problem solving. As with Working with Others, each phase can be focused on separately in the learning and development phase, but the portfolio requires two examples, each of which follows though all three components of the qualification. Improving Own Learning and Performance, like the other wider key skills, requires the learner to become consciously aware of how they learn and which ways of learning are most effective for them in different situations. Many learners will have used only one or two ways of learning hitherto and need to be introduced to other possibilities. They must take responsibility for improving their learning and performance, set targets for what they want to learn or do, make a plan with targets, follow the plan, reflect on and review their progress, establish what they have achieved, and agree ways to further improve their performance. Any of the learning outcomes in the Principal Learning unit could provide opportunities to develop IOLP skills, but SMART targets must be set that relate to the purpose of the unit. The portfolio of evidence must include at least one example that covers at least three targets. Overall, the evidence must show at least two different ways of learning.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 120
Suggested context
C3.1.2
information feelings opinions questions complex instructions on a range of familiar and unfamiliar topics, using appropriate language and non-verbal communication, and in a range of contexts. (a) Taking part in formal discussions with two or more other people
(b) Giving a talk/presentation of at least eight minutes.
C3.1.3
Reading
Reading, understanding and synthesising information from at least two documents about the same subject. Each document must be at least 1,000 words long. At least one must contain complex information or reasoning and at least one must contain an image Research information concerning effective types of maintenance strategies. Synthesis this information, and include a comparison to plan the maintenance activity to be used.
C3.2 C3.2.1
Writing
Writing two documents of different types, each one giving different information to different audiences about complex subjects in appropriate formats and using language that is appropriate to purpose and audience. One document must be at least 1,000 words long. Produce a report on the effects on production of plant, equipment or system failure. Produce an evaluation concerning the effectiveness of maintenance strategies.
C3.3 C3.3.1
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 121
Suggested context
ICT3.1.2 ICT3.1.3
Following safe, healthy and secure working practices at all times. Finding, selecting and exchanging information Planning how to find the ICT-based and non ICT-based information required. Searching for, evaluating, selecting and getting, from a range of sources, relevant ICT-based and non ICTbased information. Entering, saving, communicating and exchanging ICT-based information to suit the purpose. Developing and presenting information Organising, developing, formatting and combining ICT-based and non ICT-based information from different sources to suit content and purpose, in the form of: a) text b) tables c) images d) numbers e) records. Presenting the final output effectively, using a consistent style and formats and layouts that are appropriate to purpose and audience, using ICT, and reviewing the work.
Use ICT to present combined, organised and formatted ICT and non ICT information, including text, tables, images numbers and records in a maintenance plan, taking account the views of others, for a given type of maintenance strategy. Review work. Plan, search for, select and evaluate ICT based and non ICT based sources concerning maintenance plans and strategies. Enter, save, communicate and exchange the information to inform the maintenance plan.
ICT3.2 ICT3.2.1
ICT3.1.2
ICT3.1.3
ICT3.3 ICT3.3.1
ICT3.3.2
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 122
Suggested context
N3.1.2 N3.1.3
N3.2 N3.2.1
N3.2.2
N3.3 N3.3.1
N3.3.2
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 123
Carry out individual responsibilities to produce a joint report on the cost of poor maintenance. Develop co-operation with others, regularly checking progress.
WO3.2
Review the extent to which the work has been successful. Identify own role and agree how collaborative work could be improved in the future.
WO3.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 124
Suggested context
Setting learning targets and preparing an action plan for the investigation and development of a maintenance plan for a given type of maintenance strategy.
Reference LP3.1
LP3.1.1
LP3.1.2 LP3.1.3
LP3.2
LP3.2.1
LP3.2.2
LP3.2.3
LP3.3
LP3.3.1
LP3.3.2 LP3.3.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 125
PS3.1 PS3.1.1
PS3.1.2
PS3.1.3
PS3.2 PS3.2.1
PS3.2.2
PS3.2.3
PS3.3
PS3.3.1
PS3.3.2
PS3.3.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 5: MAINTAINING ENGINEERING PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS (WALES) 126
Work experience This unit can be delivered and evidence gathered from a work placement. Learning about maintenance strategies, activities and things that can go wrong (consequences and effects on customer interfaces and production) when applied to a real engineering company will maximise learners understanding. Engineering companies are likely to have maintenance activities that learners could follow and maintenance requirements that will need data to be collected and interpreted and a range of maintenance tasks that would require a risk assessment to be carried out. Centres who can utilise work experience will maximise their learners opportunities to succeed. Specialist resources Much of the content for this unit can be structured into case study material that takes into account industrial practice and materials and centres should allow time for the development of these materials. Centres will also need to identify a range of locally available engineered plant, equipment and systems on which learners can base their maintenance investigations. In addition, specialised reference material, such as health and safety regulations and examples of a range of documentation as listed within the what you need to learn section should be made available to learners. A well stocked library, complete with internet research facilities, should also be provided. Appropriate health and safety materials, including a range of signs and warning notices, should be prominently displayed in workshops and practical resource areas. Centres should also consider the use of resources that can be accessed within local industry. These are likely to make excellent resources for the generation of case study materials and will usefully help to bring to life the more theoretical parts of this unit. Industrial contacts will usually be able to suggest maintenance tasks that learners can observe, including those that involve testing, inspection and the replacement of worn components and consumable materials. Reference material Hawkins B and Smith R Lean Maintenance: Reduce Costs, Improve Quality and Increase Market Share (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004) ISBN 0750677791 Hughes P and Ferrett E Introduction to Health and Safety at Work (Elsevier, 2005) ISBN 0750666234 Levitt J Complete Guide to Predictive and Preventive Maintenance (Industrial Press, 2002) ISBN 0831131543 Palmer R Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Handbook (McGraw-Hill, 2006) ISBN 0071457666
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 127
Learning outcomes
On completion of this unit, a learner should: LO.1. Understand the differences between traditional and modern manufacturing production systems used within engineering industries LO.2. Understand how different types of manufacturing processes utilise computer aided manufacturing systems LO.3. Be able to plan for the production of an engineered product for industry LO.4 Be able to work in a team and apply quality control and quality assurance systems.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 128
LO.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 129
LO.4
Be able to work in a team and apply quality control and quality assurance systems
Learners will need to understand that manufactured products are required to conform to a customers specification. This can be a combination of national or international standards and/or the customers own standards. They will learn that the control of these standards during the production process is essential. Learners will discover how industry employs statistical process control (SPC) to achieve quality in processes, e.g. using statistical tools such as mean and variance to detect whether a process is under control, limits (such as inner, outer, warning, action). Learners will study a process where variation is a problem and produce control charts in order to determine when corrective actions are required. Learners will be introduced to and become familiar with ISO 9001, its purpose and content to help understand the process control procedure. They will also be able to work in a team to gather and share data to support quality control and assurance procedures and measures.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 130
LO.2
Understand how different types of manufacturing processes utilise computer aided manufacturing systems Be able to plan for the production of an engineered product for industry
LO.3
LO.4
Be able to work in a team and apply quality control and quality assurance systems
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 131
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 132
Marking grid A
Assessment focus LO.1 Understand the differences between traditional and modern manufacturing production systems used within engineering industries Mark Band 1 Explores the issues and explains the differences between traditional and modern manufacturing production systems in terms of number and volume of products manufactured, gives examples of typical products for each system. Mark Band 2 Explains the differences between traditional and modern manufacturing production systems in terms of number and volume of products manufactured, gives examples of typical products for each system and compares the layout and arrangements of the processes and equipment for a traditional and a modern manufacturing production system and discusses how they affect the flow of materials and products. Mark Band 3 Explains the differences between the traditional and modern manufacturing production systems in terms of number and volume of products manufactured, gives examples of typical products for each system and compares the layout and arrangements of the processes and equipment for a traditional and a modern manufacturing production systems and discusses how they affect the flow of materials and products and analyses how a lean manufacturing system overcomes limitations in a traditional manufacturing production system. (1113) Explains the processes and level of computer aided manufacturing used to manufacture selected products in two different engineering manufacturing industries, analyses and compares the processes and level of automation used to manufacture selected products and presents a justification for the selection of processes and level of automation used. (1113) 13 13 Maximum marks available
(06) LO.2 Understand how different types of manufacturing processes utilise computer aided manufacturing systems Explains the processes and level of computer aided manufacturing used to manufacture selected products in two different engineering manufacturing industries.
(710) Explains the processes and level of computer aided manufacturing used to manufacture selected products in two different engineering manufacturing industries and analyses and compares the processes and level of automation used to manufacture selected products.
(06)
(710)
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 133
Assessment focus LO.3 Be able to plan for the production of an engineered product for industry
Mark Band 1 Produces a project network analysis to show the critical path for the production of a quantity of the same engineered product.
Mark Band 2 Produces a project network analysis to show the critical path for the production of a quantity of the same engineered product and develops a detailed production plan and realistic schedule.
Mark Band 3 Produces a project network analysis to show the critical path for the production of a quantity of the same engineered product, develops a detailed production plan and realistic schedule, reviews and justifies the production plan and schedule suggesting ways in which it could be improved. (1417) Produces appropriate charts to control the output against a required standard, analyses in detail the process control data to explain how variations effect the process and product and uses relevant parts of the ISO 9001 standards to help propose and evaluate an appropriate course of action to alleviate unwanted process variations. (810)
(07) LO.4 Be able to work in a team and apply quality control and quality assurance systems Produces appropriate charts to control the output against a required standard.
(813) Produces appropriate charts to control the output against a required standard and analyses in detail the process control data to explain how variations affect the process and product.
17
(04)
(57)
10
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 134
Marking grid B
Assessment focus LO.4 Be able to work in a team and apply quality control and quality assurance systems Mark Band 1 Works in a team to collect sufficient and appropriate data from an engineering manufacturing process. Mark Band 2 Works effectively in a team to collect sufficient and appropriate data from an engineering manufacturing process. Mark Band 3 Plays a key role as a member of a team to collect sufficient and appropriate data from an engineering manufacturing process. Maximum marks available
(03)
(45)
(67)
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 135
Assessment guidance
Using the marking grid Each internally assessed unit has 60 available marks in total. In some units the marking grid has been split into two grids A and B. Marking grid A contains all of the marking criteria for the unit except those which assess a learners performance in practical activities which are recorded as a witness testimony or observation record. These make up grid B. Centres must ensure that learners undertake appropriate assessment tasks to enable them to achieve the requirements of each units marking grid(s). The basic principle is that this is a best fit grid i.e. the assessor must match the overall standard of work for an assessment focus to a band. It is NOT a hurdle approach, whereby the assessor cannot award marks from the next mark band if one item for an assessment focus from a lower mark band has been omitted, regardless of the quality of the rest of the work for that assessment focus. If a learner completes all they are asked to do in a band for an assessment focus, they can be awarded the full marks for that mark band. If a learner has clearly done more on one aspect of work for an assessment focus required by a mark band, the assessor should consider whether the learner can be awarded marks from the bottom of the next mark band. If a learner has completed less than required in any aspect of work for an assessment focus, or indeed omitted an aspect, then the mark moves down within the mark band. Marking is completely separate for each assessment focus i.e. a learner can get mark band 3 on one assessment focus, mark band 1 on another etc, then all marks are added together for the unit total. It may be possible, depending on weighting of an assessment focus for a learner to pass a unit even if 0 has been given in marks for one assessment focus in the unit. A 0 mark should be used only where a learner provides no valid evidence. Any work that starts to address the requirements of the grid should normally be awarded at least one mark. Evidence generated for marking grid A will be moderated. This must be in the form of hard evidence which a moderator can reassess, such as learner produced written documents (e.g. short question answers, multiple choice question answers, materials from presentations, research notes), videos (dated) of practical activities or artefacts. Marks gained from marking grid A will be reported separately from those gained from marking grid B.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 136
Assessment focus LO.2 Mark Band 13 (013 marks) The learner will explain the processes and level of computer aided manufacturing used to manufacture selected products, up to 3 marks for each of the two engineering manufacturing industries, up to a total of 6 marks. The explanation must link the automation to the process required for the manufacture of the product. One mark can be awarded for the analysis and comparison of the processes, and another mark for the analysis and comparison of the level of automation for the selected products in each of the two different engineering manufacturing industries. Award up to 3 marks for the justification of the processes and level of automation used to manufacture a selected product from an engineering manufacturing industry.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 137
Assessment focus LO.3 Mark Band 13 Up to 3 marks can be awarded for the project network analysis to show (017 marks) the critical path, the earliest start time and earliest finish time for most of the activities. Up to 2 marks can be awarded for the latest start time for most of the activities and up to 2 marks for the latest finish time for most activities. The decision about whether most of the times for the activities have been shown correctly or not depends on the amount of activities within the network. If the manufacture of the product is of a complex nature and involves a lot of activities it would be unfair to penalise a learner who can apply the process of calculating the times but makes some numerical or application errors, bearing in mind that this process involves cumulative calculations. The judgement to award marks should be based on the understanding the learner shows about these network times. Up to 3 marks can be awarded for a detailed production plan with all the information needed to manufacture a quantity of the same engineered product, as laid out in the content section. Award another mark if a third party could follow the plan. Up to 2 further marks may be awarded for a realistic schedule. Award 1 mark for the review and 1 mark for the justification of the revised production plan. Award 1 mark for the review and 1 mark for the justification of the revised schedule. It is expected that to gain full marks for mark band 3 the response would include suggestion on improvements to both.
Assessment focus LO.4 Mark Band 13 Up to 2 marks could be awarded for the production of appropriate charts (010 marks) to control output against a required standard and a further 2 marks for a chart to control the mean and variance. The charts should have clear control limits. Up to 3 marks can be awarded for a detailed analysis of the process control data (possibly in the form of a report) and for an explanation of how variations affect the process and product. Up to 3 marks can be awarded for the proposed course of action to alleviate unwanted process variations and for its evaluation. There must be evidence that some of the procedures of ISO 9001 have influenced the proposal.
Marking grid B Assessment focus LO.4 Mark Band 13 (07 marks) Marks can be awarded for teamwork and the collection and sharing of sufficient, appropriate data from a manufacturing process. To achieve mark band 1 the learner will play a part in team activities and make an overall contribution. For mark band 2, the learner will take responsibility for their own actions and also accept a share of collective responsibility. To be eligible for mark band 3, the learner will show that they can play a key role in the team activity.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 138
Approaches to assessment
It is most likely that tutors will want to set a number of separate tasks within the assignment that give learners opportunities to achieve each of the assessment foci. All of these could be completed on placement in suitable engineering manufacturing industries or in a well equipped workshop. Activities will need to be set within each task to give learners the opportunity to progress across the mark bands. Task 1 could be a written report or oral presentation covering assessment focus 1. This will require the learner to explore the issues and explain the differences in traditional and modern manufacturing production systems in industries. At this level the learner will need to have sufficient knowledge and understanding of at least two different manufacturing systems to be able to explain the differences and to provide examples of typical products for each. For example, a visit to a metals industry plant and an aerospace manufacturer could provide the contrast in systems and products required. Choosing one industry that employs lean manufacturing techniques would be appropriate. Task 2 could be a written report or oral presentation covering assessment focus 2. This could also be done on placement and possibly in the same industries used for 1 depending on the opportunities available. Alternatively, the task may direct learners towards two completely different industries so that they get a broader knowledge and experience of engineering manufacturing. This is likely to depend on the number and types of local industries and the level of access centres have to them. Task 3 could be a written report or oral presentation covering assessment focus 3. Within the report or presentation will be the completed network, including the critical path and also a schedule and justification for mark bands 2 and 3 respectively. Activities will therefore need to be given that give learners opportunities to develop these requirements and suitable evidence. Task 4 should be a process portfolio covering assessment focus 4. An activity that directs the learner to collect process control data from a local industry or other local source needs setting. This activity must involve learners getting together, as a team, and making decisions about who will collect what data. This data should then be shared before each learner produces their own production charts. It is important that the evidence for teamwork is appropriately documented. The type of evidence expected must differentiate between the performances of each team member during collection and sharing activities. For example, evidence for assessment focus 4 mark band 1, 2 and 3 may take the form of a witness statement or tutor observation record to demonstrate that the learner did contribute to the collection and sharing of data within the team and fulfilled their own role within the team. Other supplementary evidence such as minutes of team meetings would also help consolidate this evidence. A learner statement simply saying I contributed well to the team would be insufficient. The subsequent analysis of the data, and the proposal and evaluation of action to alleviate unwanted process variations do not have to be done in teams or in industry, although tutors may consider involving industrial partners in the assessment process. The tasks can be devised for each assessment focus as indicated but where possible these should be linked to allow the holistic nature of the unit to come across. It is recognised, however, that this is not always possible. If a learner needs to retake any assignment, it is essential that different computer aided manufacturing systems, products and data be used to retain the validity of the assessment.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 139
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 140
Guidance for Integrating Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Level 3
Skills in applied learning A unique and central feature of Principal Learning (PL) is the requirement that at least 50% must be completed in an applied or work-related context. This means that learners must actively engage with the curriculum they are studying, putting theory into practice and working cooperatively with other learners, with their teachers, and with people from outside the classroom. They should learn in a range of contexts and environments, carrying out investigations and active enquiries, learning through doing and relating their learning to job roles. The skills embodied in the three Essential Skills Wales (ESW) and the three wider key skills (WKS) are therefore integral to the delivery of Principal Learning (PL) at all levels and in all lines of learning. Principal Learning offers many opportunities to develop all six skills (ESW + WKS) that are required if a candidate is to achieve the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ). To achieve the WBQ at Advanced level, learners must achieve three of the six skills at Level 3, one of which must be ESW Communication, Application of Number or ICT, together with the other three skills at Level 2 Developing skills The table below lists, in the first column, the skills that a learner must develop for the ESW or WKS in question. The second column suggests a PL context in which the skill would arise naturally and might be developed. It is important that, when developing an ESW skill, both the learner and the teacher pay close attention to the section in the standards headed In order to show that you are competent. Similarly for the WKS, teachers and learners must study Part A. The third column in the table identifies the ESW or WKS component. Portfolio evidence If a learner is aiming to generate portfolio evidence in the context of a learning activity or assignment in PL, it is important to ensure that the requirements of the assignment match the evidence requirements of the skill qualification (ESW or WKS) in question, in terms of content and of presentation. A portfolio of evidence will often require more than one example of the skill, so teachers will need to identify other contexts and opportunities from the many that exist in the context of the WBQ as a whole. The table below does not include details of these requirements. It is therefore essential that teachers are familiar with: the standards for ESW and the associated documents Amplification of Evidence Requirements (which includes guidance), and Mandatory Definitions, which are available from http://old.accac.org.uk/eng/content.php?mID=752 the standards for the wider key skills and the associated document The key skills qualifications and guidance: working with others, improving own learning and performance and problem solving levels 1-4 2004 (QCA 2004); order ref QCA/04/1294, downloadable from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_6462.aspx .
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 141
It is important to emphasise that candidates may develop these skills and/or generate portfolio evidence from anywhere in their learning programme. It is therefore not necessary, nor expected, that any one unit of Principal Learning should offer development and/or evidence opportunities for all the components of each of the six skills. Where opportunities to develop these skills and to provide portfolio evidence arise naturally in learning contexts, they should be pursued; learning and assignments should not be distorted to include the skills where they do not arise naturally. Essential Skills Wales Communication The ESW standards aim to integrate the different aspects of communication (speaking and listening, reading and writing) and emphasise that communication should be purposeful. So, for example, the purpose of reading might be to inform discussion and/or writing, or a discussion might be part of a candidates preparation for a piece of writing, all in relation to the purpose of the Principal Learning unit. Application of Number The ESW standards emphasise that numbers must be applied and used for the purpose of tackling a problem or task. At Level 3, the standards are structured round the following process: Understand and tackle a problem Collect and interpret data Carry out calculations Check results Interpret results Present findings Reflect/review.
The problem should arise naturally in the context of the candidates work for the Principal Learning unit. For portfolio evidence at this level, the candidate must carry out at least one activity that shows their skills in the process as a whole, ie covering all three components of the unit. ICT As with Application of Number, the ESW standards emphasise the importance of using ICT in context and for a purpose. The Amplification of evidence requirements specifically states that You must demonstrate your ICT skills in the context of these activities; demonstrating your skills in isolation cannot be used as evidence. Also similarly to Application of Number, the learner, while developing their ICT skills, is likely to focus on parts of the process and on specific skills, but they should always have the big picture in mind and build towards seeing the process as a whole. For the portfolio, the Amplification states that: You must carry out at least two activities that, overall: show that you can plan and carry through a number of different activities, one of which must be a complex activity covering ICT3.1, ICT3.2 and ICT3.3.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 142
While much of the portfolio evidence may be presented electronically and/or as printouts, it is essential that it shows the processes the candidate used to confirm their understanding of their task, to select, enter and develop information, and to present their work. This will normally involve drafting, revising, correcting, redrafting or reformatting the work. This is therefore an important aspect of developing ESW ICT, and the evidence submitted for assessment must include at least one complete draft with notes, annotations, highlighting, alterations etc. The final printouts, presentations etc are not, on their own, sufficient as evidence, though they must be included in the portfolio. The wider key skills All three of the wider key skills require the candidate to learn and to demonstrate the process skills of: Planning Doing Reviewing.
Each component of this process can be learned and developed separately, though portfolio evidence must cover all three components of the qualification in a single activity. Working with Others at Level 3 requires that the example in the portfolio shows that the learner can work as part of a group or team made up of at least three people (i.e. the learner works with at least two other people). The learner must become conscious of and focus on their own skills and how they relate to others if they are to develop their ability to contribute effectively to a team project or activity. They must be able to review their work with others, identify factors that influenced the outcome and agree how to improve their teamworking skills for the future. The evidence in a candidates portfolio must show their individual contribution to the work of the group. Problem Solving is a skill that many younger learners do not at first recognise as a skill that, like other skills, involves learning and developing specialised techniques. The learner has to identify and analyse a problem (which must be individual to them, not a group activity), come up with different ways of tackling it and choose one, make a plan, follow it, and check whether the problem has been solved. They must then review their approach to problem solving. As with Working with Others, each phase can be focused on separately in the learning and development phase, but the portfolio requires two examples, each of which follows though all three components of the qualification. Improving Own Learning and Performance, like the other wider key skills, requires the learner to become consciously aware of how they learn and which ways of learning are most effective for them in different situations. Many learners will have used only one or two ways of learning hitherto and need to be introduced to other possibilities. They must take responsibility for improving their learning and performance, set targets for what they want to learn or do, make a plan with targets, follow the plan, reflect on and review their progress, establish what they have achieved, and agree ways to further improve their performance. Any of the learning outcomes in the Principal Learning unit could provide opportunities to develop IOLP skills, but SMART targets must be set that relate to the purpose of the unit. The portfolio of evidence must include at least one example that covers at least three targets. Overall, the evidence must show at least two different ways of learning.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 143
Suggested context
C3.1.2
information feelings opinions questions complex instructions on a range of familiar and unfamiliar topics, using appropriate language and non-verbal communication, and in a range of contexts. (a) Taking part in formal discussions with two or more other people
(b) Giving a talk/presentation of at least eight minutes.
C3.1.3
Reading
Reading, understanding and synthesising information from at least two documents about the same subject. Each document must be at least 1,000 words long. At least one must contain complex information or reasoning and at least one must contain an image Research information concerning the differences between traditional and modern manufacturing systems. Synthesis this information into the talk/presentation.
C3.2 C3.2.1
Writing
Writing two documents of different types, each one giving different information to different audiences about complex subjects in appropriate formats and using language that is appropriate to purpose and audience. One document must be at least 1,000 words long. Produce an essay on the processes and level of computer aided manufacturing used to manufacture selected products in two different engineering manufacturing industries. Produce a handout to accompany the talk/presentation.
C3.3 C3.3.1
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 144
Suggested context
ICT3.1.2 ICT3.1.3
Following safe, healthy and secure working practices at all times. Finding, selecting and exchanging information Planning how to find the ICT-based and non ICT-based information required. Searching for, evaluating, selecting and getting, from a range of sources, relevant ICT-based and non ICTbased information. Entering, saving, communicating and exchanging ICT-based information to suit the purpose. Developing and presenting information Organising, developing, formatting and combining ICT-based and non ICT-based information from different sources to suit content and purpose, in the form of: a) text b) tables c) images d) numbers e) records. Presenting the final output effectively, using a consistent style and formats and layouts that are appropriate to purpose and audience, using ICT, and reviewing the work.
Use ICT to present combined, organised and formatted ICT and non ICT information, including text, tables, images numbers and records in document on the differences between traditional and modern manufacturing production systems. Review work. Plan, search for, select and evaluate ICT based and non ICT based sources concerning the differences between traditional and modern manufacturing production systems. Enter, save, communicate and exchange the information to inform a document.
ICT3.2 ICT3.2.1
ICT3.1.2
ICT3.1.3
ICT3.3 ICT3.3.1
ICT3.3.2
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 145
Suggested context
N3.1.2 N3.1.3
N3.2 N3.2.1
Using the data and information obtained to carry out calculations relevant to the task to do with: u) amounts or sizes v) scales or proportion w) handling statistics x) using formulae Interpreting results and presenting findings Selecting and justifying two different ways to present results, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams appropriate to audience. Presenting and explaining methods and findings and justifying how they meet the purpose of the task and are appropriate to the audience.
N3.2.2
N3.3
Justify and explain methods and findings concerning whether the production manufacturing process is under control. Present results in two different ways, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams.
N3.3.1
N3.3.2
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 146
Develop co-operative working with the team to carry out the statistical process control (SPC) activity and check progress towards objectives.
WO3.2
Reviewing collaborative work with others when carrying out the statistical process control (SPC) activity and agreeing ways of improving working with others in the future, including interpersonal skills.
WO3.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 147
Suggested context
Seeking ways to achieve activity, setting learning targets and preparing action plan with the team to apply quality control and assurance systems. Evidence must show the individual learners contribution
Reference LP3.1
LP3.1.1
LP3.1.2 LP3.1.3
LP3.2
LP3.2.1
LP3.2.2
LP3.2.3
LP3.3
LP3.3.1
LP3.3.2 LP3.3.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 148
PS3.1.2
PS3.1.3
PS3.2 PS3.2.1
PS3.2.2
PS3.2.3
PS3.3
PS3.3.1
PS3.3.2
PS3.3.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 6: INVESTIGATING MODERN MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES USED IN ENGINEERING (WALES) 149
Work experience Learners can gain knowledge, skills and understanding for the learning outcomes during work placements and evidence can be collected to satisfy some of the summative assessment requirements. For example, assessment foci 1 and 2 could be addressed by the learner on placement in at least two different engineering industries so that research and information gathering is carried out first hand. Whilst on placement learners could be given the basic information needed to complete assessment focus 3 mark bands 1 and 2, and develop a revised production plan for analysis and justification in mark band 3. Assessment focus 4 requires learners to collect data from an engineering manufacturing process. This could be done whilst on placement or during a visit. Remember the data has to be collected whilst the learner is working as part of a team and needs to share the data. Reference material Conner G Lean Manufacturing for the Small Shop (SME, 2001) ISBN 9780872635203 Shingo S Mistake Proofing for Operators (Productivity Press, 1997) ISBN 1563271273
Learning outcomes
On completion of this unit, a learner should: LO.1. Know how a successful new product evolves LO.2. Know about individuals who have become successful engineering entrepreneurs LO.3. Understand how engineering activities impact on society and the environment LO.4. Be able to produce or improve designs in an innovative way LO.5. Know about opportunities for success when bringing a new product to market.
LO.2
LO.3
Learners will need to investigate how engineering activities have an impact upon the social fabric of society and the sustainability of resources used, taking into consideration energy usage, pollution, material disposal. Learners will also investigate how new product design must meet accepted environmental standards. Learners will need to be able to participate in the design of new products or improve existing products in an innovative way by developing skills in thinking for design purposes, problem solving, analytical thinking and using data to advantage. Learners will also consider how to present innovative designs or improvements to an interested audience. Learners will consider improvements to key product features such as aesthetics, function, materials, manufacture, environmental performance, eco-friendliness.
LO.5. Know about opportunities for success when bringing a new product to market
You will develop skills in identifying commercial and technological opportunities and how they can be used to advantage You will need to consider benefits and applications of emerging technologies such as use of nanotechnology in fabricating devices with atomic or molecular scale precision and the applications this could be put to in improving the way in which we currently live through nanomachines, nanoelectronics and nanodevices, the likely first applications including computer science, communications and medical science. Learners will also understand how ideas can be legally protected, intellectual property rights, UK and international intellectual property legislation, patenting process, design registration, copyright and trade marking.
LO.2
LO.3
Understand how engineering activities impact on society and the environment Be able to produce or improve designs in an innovative way
LO.4
LO.5
Know about opportunities for success when bringing a new product to market
Marking grid A
Assessment focus LO.1 Know how a successful new product evolves Mark Band 1 Identifies two products that are recognised as being innovative, and compares them to traditional counterparts in terms of their design/operation, method of manufacture and marketing approach. Mark Band 2 Identifies two products that are recognised as being innovative, compares them to traditional counterparts in terms of their design/operation, method of manufacture, marketing approach and explains the features of one of the products that has led to it being regarded as innovative. (57) Mark Band 3 Identifies two products that are recognised as being innovative, compares them to traditional counterparts in terms of their design/operation, method of manufacture, marketing approach and explains the features of one of the products that has led to it being regarded as innovative and the factors that have made it a success. (810) Identifies two successful entrepreneurial engineeringbased individuals, and describes their route to success, identifies the key factors that led to their success and analyses the reasons for their success in their careers. (810) Uses a range of case studies to discuss different ways in which engineering activity has had an impact on social activity and behaviour, and different ways in which environmental issues have been addressed. (810) 10 10 10 Maximum marks available
(04) LO.2 Know about individuals who have become successful engineering entrepreneurs Identifies two successful entrepreneurial engineeringbased individuals, and describes their route to success.
Identifies two successful entrepreneurial engineeringbased individuals, describes their route to success and the key factors that led to their success.
(04) LO.3 Understand how engineering activities impact on society and the environment Describes ways in which two engineering activities have had an impact on social activity, behaviour and the environment.
(57)
Explains ways in which engineering activity has had an impact on social activity and behaviour and how environmental issues have been addressed. (57)
(04)
Mark Band 1 Produces a new design, or an improvement to an existing one, that displays innovation in terms of a least two key product features.
Mark Band 2 Produces a new design, or an improvement to an existing one, that displays innovation in terms of at least two key product features, explaining the value of the innovative features.
Mark Band 3 Produces a new design, or an improvement to an existing one, that displays innovation in terms of at least two key product features, explaining the value of the innovative features and the thinking and research processes that have led to the innovations. (78) Describes how new products can be brought to market, reviews the ways in which two innovative products were brought to market, one that was a commercial success and one that failed and analyses the possible reasons for these two opposite outcomes. (1114)
(04) LO.5 Know about opportunities for success when bringing a new product to market Describes how new products can be brought to market.
(56) Describes how new products can be brought to market and reviews the ways in which two innovative products, one that was a commercial success and one that failed, were brought to market.
(06)
(710)
14
Marking grid B
Assessment focus LO.4 Be able to produce or improve designs in an innovative way Mark Band 1 Gives a satisfactory presentation that partially engages the audience, conveys most of their design ideas and answers basic questions from the audience. (04) Mark Band 2 Gives an effective presentation that engages the audience, conveys their design ideas and answers a variety of questions from the audience. (56) Mark Band 3 Gives an effective and confident presentation that engages the audience, clearly conveys their design ideas and answers a wide variety of questions from the audience (78) 8 Total marks (10+10+10+8+14+8) = 60 Maximum marks available
Assessment guidance Using the marking grid Each internally assessed unit has 60 available marks in total. In some units the marking grid has been split into two grids A and B. Marking grid A contains all of the marking criteria for the unit except those which assess a learners performance in practical activities which are recorded as a witness testimony or observation record. These make up grid B. Centres must ensure that learners undertake appropriate assessment tasks to enable them to achieve the requirements of each units marking grid(s). The basic principle is that this is a best fit grid i.e. the assessor must match the overall standard of work for an assessment focus to a band. It is NOT a hurdle approach, whereby the assessor cannot award marks from the next mark band if one item for an assessment focus from a lower mark band has been omitted, regardless of the quality of the rest of the work for that assessment focus. If a learner completes all they are asked to do in a band for an assessment focus, they can be awarded the full marks for that mark band. If a learner has clearly done more on one aspect of work for an assessment focus required by a mark band, the assessor should consider whether the learner can be awarded marks from the bottom of the next mark band. If a learner has completed less than required in any aspect of work for an assessment focus, or indeed omitted an aspect, then the mark moves down within the mark band. Marking is completely separate for each assessment focus i.e. a learner can get mark band 3 on one assessment focus, mark band 1 on another etc, then all marks are added together for the unit total. It may be possible, depending on weighting of an assessment focus for a learner to pass a unit even if 0 has been given in marks for one assessment focus in the unit. A 0 mark should be used only where a learner provides no valid evidence. Any work that starts to address the requirements of the grid should normally be awarded at least one mark. Evidence generated for marking grid A will be moderated. This must be in the form of hard evidence which a moderator can reassess, such as learner produced written documents (e.g. short question answers, multiple choice question answers, materials from presentations, research notes), videos (dated) of practical activities or artefacts. Marks gained from marking grid A will be reported separately from those gained from marking grid B.
Assessment focus LO.2 Mark Band 1 There is no credit simply for naming appropriate individuals; the credit (04 marks) comes from describing their routes to success. This might cover some traditional features like education and training, but the emphasis should be on what has led them to their success perhaps by considering early breakthrough developments (e.g. James Dysons ballbarrow) and showing how that led through to later, higher profile developments. A good response would probably highlight three or four key milestones in an individuals rise to fame. Strong responses about one individual can offset weaker responses about the second. Any response that relates to just one person throughout will only be eligible for marks in this band. Mark Band 2 (57 marks) For full marks the learner should have initially chosen entrepreneurs with a reputation for innovation and then researched in some depth to identify the ideas or actions that began the rise to fame (and possibly wealth). The band 2 response goes beyond that for band 1 by being a fuller, more detailed description of the individuals pathways to success. Within this fuller picture the learner can accurately pick out the key milestones that had the greatest effect in establishing the individuals reputation. Marks lower in the band will be for the responses which describe in detail most of the milestones but which dont bring out those which have had the greatest impact, or the responses which have addressed only some of the success factors. Mark Band 3 (810 marks) For full marks there do not necessarily need to be more facts about the individual than for band 2, but there will be a real understanding of what the events, people and influences were that shaped their success. In addition to describing in detail the path of the chosen entrepreneurs, there is analysis that looks at the impact of the key factors to comment on how each was important. Responses will need some explicit analysis of such moments in the career of one of their chosen entrepreneurs to start earning marks in this band.
Assessment focus LO.3 Learners will need to describe social, behavioural and environmental Mark Band 1 issues to get full marks. It is likely that there will be two or three well-made (04 marks) points about each aspect but a response that was more strongly weighted towards one aspect or the other could still get full marks as long as the other aspects were considered in some meaningful way. In this band the learner may take something of an unbalanced view and see these impacts as essentially negative for example. At the lower end of this band responses will be thinner, with perhaps only one or two points made about each topic, and possibly in the form of generalised statements. Learners ought to back up their comments with reference to actual activities, even if they are not presented as case studies. The response that focuses entirely on social, behavioural or environmental aspects will be limited to credit in this band, no matter the detail that is given. Mark Band 2 (57 marks) At band 2 learners should be starting to take a more balanced view of the impacts on social, behavioural and environmental activities, with a recognition that these can be both positive and negative, and the highest mark should be reserved for those who demonstrate this. Responses should be explanatory in nature, rather than descriptive, so that the reason for the impact is made clear, as well as the description of the impact that would on its own have been a band 1 approach. At the lower end of this band responses may have only some of the points explained, and may be imbalanced. Strong explanations that are left as generalisations about engineering in general without being related to actual case studies should not get beyond the bottom of this band. Mark Band 3 (810 marks) This band is characterised by the response built around some strong case studies which between them address a range of social and environmental issues. The learner has discussed these issues to look at them from different angles, demonstrating, for example, an understanding that what may be a negative impact for one constituency could be positive for others, and that few impacts are entirely good or bad. Alternatively, the response may challenge perceived wisdom. The discuss element is important in getting access to this band; responses that are just very good explanations are very good band 2 responses. It needs only some discussed points to get into the lower end of this band, but at the top end this must be the approach that dominates.
Assessment focus LO.4 Mark Band 1 (04 marks) The learner presents a description of one or more innovations that have been made to an existing product, or designed into something new. One creative and well-developed innovative improvement could be enough to set the learner on the way to full marks in this band, but it would need to be supported by at least one other smaller innovation, identified but not so well developed. Alternatively there might be two equally well-developed and described ideas. The features should include any two from a range including aesthetics, function, materials, manufacture or environmental performance. To achieve marks in this band the design will be innovative in at least two ways from the features listed in band 1 and the innovations will be explained to show how they add value to the product. Learners getting full marks for this aspect will have explained both ways in which innovation has been achieved, while marks lower in the band will have less convincing explanation, or a mix of description and explanation. The need to explain should draw out the creative potential in learners, and this should be rewarded. For credit in this band, learners will be going beyond explanation of the value of their design to explain the creative process behind it. Some acknowledgement of this is essential to start scoring in this band, no matter how good the innovations might otherwise be. For full marks on the content side, there will be a clear explanation of at least two of the processes that led to the innovations being designed.
Assessment focus LO.5 Mark Band 1 (06 marks) Responses at this level are characterised by making general points about bringing a product to market. There may be some references to actual products, but they are dropped in to support the generalisations, rather than being a case study around which the response is built. For full marks the learner should recognise the range of activities involved, including most stages as testing the market, funding, competitive manufacturing, sales and marketing and legal protection of new ideas. Fewer marks will be available to the learner with a narrow range, although good case study-based coverage of just two or three stages could get close to full marks in this band. For full marks at this level the response should be based around two case studies, with a recognition of the breadth of activity, although inevitably there will be more detail about certain aspects, such as the marketing campaign or the quality of the product, than others such as the legal protection of the idea. For band 2 the review of the two studies does not expect great depth, with more emphasis on breadth and, at the top of the band, some explanation for the success/failure or for the way in which it was brought to market. Marks lower in the band will be appropriate for case studies lacking a bit in breadth, or being purely a description of what happened. Band 3 requires some analysis of the reasons for success/failure. The bulk of the response will be good case study description as for Level 2, but the quality of the reasoning to explain the success/failure will determine access to the top marks. One strong evaluative comment about each outcome could be enough, although others will get there with two or three simpler reasons for each outcome.
Marking grid B Assessment focus LO.4 Mark Band 1-3 Presentations may be oral, supported by slides, sound effects, artefacts etc, or could be wall-mounted displays with sketches, plans, or annotated (08 marks) photographs, multi-media displays or other appropriate forms. To be eligible for mark band 1 the learner will give a basic presentation which conveys most of their design ideas. They will be able to answer some straight forward questions from the audience. For mark band 2 the learner will be able to engage the audience when presenting their design ideas. They will be able to answer a range of question from the audience. For mark band 3 the learner will give an assured and confident presentation covering all aspects of their design ideas, engaging the audience throughout. They will be able to answer a range of questions from the audience.
Approaches to assessment
The guidance below suggests five tasks in one assignment to cover the requirements of the unit, but there is scope for combining some of these. Taking a holistic approach, demonstrating the links between the different learning outcomes, is recommended but will not be possible in all contexts. Task 1 could cover assessment focus 1, for which learners will need to show that they have an understanding of the stages that a new product has to progress through from original idea to being a successful product in the marketplace. This could be accomplished by a written report or PowerPoint presentation relating to the introduction of well-known products or, alternatively, by case studies of specific products. As such the evidence could be submitted in either a report, presentation or case study Task 2 will require learners to identify a number of successful entrepreneurs and chart their success to achieve assessment focus 2. Case studies of successful engineering-based entrepreneurs should adequately meet this requirement, with the evidence likely to be submitted as a report or presentation. Task 3 could cover assessment focus 3 and will require learners to demonstrate an understanding of how engineering activities can impact on society in general and more specifically the environment which we all share. Learners will need to be given opportunities not only to describe ways in which two engineering activities have made an impact but also to explain how environmental issues have been addressed and what the potential environmental benefits are. The evidence would need to be submitted in a report. Task 4 could cover assessment focus 4. This could be the most challenging part of the unit, but it also carries a higher weight of marks. Learners will need to take a very practical approach, selecting products that are generally recognised as being traditional in design or technology and make improvements in their performance, appearance or method of manufacture, that utilise new technology, materials or processes. Alternatively, learners could choose to create a new design for an existing but traditional product or a completely new product. Selection of products or ideas will be important and care needs to be taken as an over-ambitious idea could need more time than would normally be expected. However, the unit is for learners with ideas so they must not be afraid to develop radical thinking. The presentation aspect of the task is important and will be the way that the learner presents their evidence in effect, makes a pitch to sell the value of their innovation(s) as well as attracting credit for their presentation skills. It replicates an unavoidable part of the entrepreneurs work, and learners might like to include some episodes of Dragons Den as part of their preparation for this activity. The audience to which the learner pitches could be composed of members of the teaching group, school or college staff, local employers or a mix of these people. If it is an oral presentation there should be about 5-10 minutes for the presentation with an opportunity for answering two or three questions afterwards. Learners presenting their designs in other ways should also have the opportunity to respond to questions. Task 5 will cover assessment focus 5 and will require learners to demonstrate their awareness of the stages involved in bringing a new product to market, particularly the problems that entrepreneurs face in persuading others that their ideas or products will not only work, but also be successful. The requirement for this assessment focus could typically be achieved by carrying out case studies of successful and innovative products for which ample evidence and sources of information should be available. As such, the evidence would need to be submitted as a case study.
Guidance for teaching this unit Delivery guidance This unit is 60 guided learning hours (GLH) in length. Centres should allocate this amount of time within the timetable for its delivery and assessment. WJEC/Edexcel has identified that within this time learners will probably require 20 GLH in activities which generate evidence for assessment. This may, for example, include time spent in experiential learning, practising skills, research activities and undertaking summative assessment activities. (See sections relating to Internal assessment and Programme design and delivery in the generic introductory part of the Guidance and units document.) The teaching of this unit should concentrate on the factors that lead to enterprise, creativity and innovative thinking and could be classified into three areas: innovation, product design and development and taking advantage of developments. When delivering learning outcome 1, learners should gain an understanding of the stages that a new product has to progress through. This could be done through the use of case studies or learners could be encouraged to research well-known or specific products such as a well known type of vacuum cleaner for example. For learning outcome 2 case studies of successful engineering-based entrepreneurs should be used, ideally those with a reputation for new and innovative ideas and products. Learners should be encouraged to research and identify the particular ideas, actions or products that set each individual entrepreneur on the road to success. The use of catalogued examples of the effects that engineering can or has had on social and environmental issues could be useful in when delivering learning outcome 3. If learners choose which specific engineering activities they wish to research, guidance should be given to ensure that the topics chosen have had positive and negative effects across social activity and behaviour and on the environment. Learning outcome 5 gives an opportunity for learners to gain an awareness of the process of bringing a new product to market. Teaching should concentrate on the introduction of commercial and technological opportunities in terms of testing the market, funding, competitive manufacturing, sales and marketing and legal protection of new ideas. They should also know about how ideas can be legally protected.
Guidance for Integrating Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Level 3
Skills in applied learning A unique and central feature of Principal Learning (PL) is the requirement that at least 50% must be completed in an applied or work-related context. This means that learners must actively engage with the curriculum they are studying, putting theory into practice and working cooperatively with other learners, with their teachers, and with people from outside the classroom. They should learn in a range of contexts and environments, carrying out investigations and active enquiries, learning through doing and relating their learning to job roles. The skills embodied in the three Essential Skills Wales (ESW) and the three wider key skills (WKS) are therefore integral to the delivery of Principal Learning (PL) at all levels and in all lines of learning. Principal Learning offers many opportunities to develop all six skills (ESW + WKS) that are required if a candidate is to achieve the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ). To achieve the WBQ at Advanced level, learners must achieve three of the six skills at Level 3, one of which must be ESW Communication, Application of Number or ICT, together with the other three skills at Level 2 Developing skills The table below lists, in the first column, the skills that a learner must develop for the ESW or WKS in question. The second column suggests a PL context in which the skill would arise naturally and might be developed. It is important that, when developing an ESW skill, both the learner and the teacher pay close attention to the section in the standards headed In order to show that you are competent. Similarly for the WKS, teachers and learners must study Part A. The third column in the table identifies the ESW or WKS component. Portfolio evidence If a learner is aiming to generate portfolio evidence in the context of a learning activity or assignment in PL, it is important to ensure that the requirements of the assignment match the evidence requirements of the skill qualification (ESW or WKS) in question, in terms of content and of presentation. A portfolio of evidence will often require more than one example of the skill, so teachers will need to identify other contexts and opportunities from the many that exist in the context of the WBQ as a whole. The table below does not include details of these requirements. It is therefore essential that teachers are familiar with: the standards for ESW and the associated documents Amplification of Evidence Requirements (which includes guidance), and Mandatory Definitions, which are available from http://old.accac.org.uk/eng/content.php?mID=752 the standards for the wider key skills and the associated document The key skills qualifications and guidance: working with others, improving own learning and performance and problem solving levels 1-4 2004 (QCA 2004); order ref QCA/04/1294, downloadable from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_6462.aspx .
It is important to emphasise that candidates may develop these skills and/or generate portfolio evidence from anywhere in their learning programme. It is therefore not necessary, nor expected, that any one unit of Principal Learning should offer development and/or evidence opportunities for all the components of each of the six skills. Where opportunities to develop these skills and to provide portfolio evidence arise naturally in learning contexts, they should be pursued; learning and assignments should not be distorted to include the skills where they do not arise naturally. Essential Skills Wales Communication The ESW standards aim to integrate the different aspects of communication (speaking and listening, reading and writing) and emphasise that communication should be purposeful. So, for example, the purpose of reading might be to inform discussion and/or writing, or a discussion might be part of a candidates preparation for a piece of writing, all in relation to the purpose of the Principal Learning unit. Application of Number The ESW standards emphasise that numbers must be applied and used for the purpose of tackling a problem or task. At Level 3, the standards are structured round the following process: Understand and tackle a problem out calculations Check results findings Reflect/review. Collect and interpret data Carry Interpret results Present
The problem should arise naturally in the context of the candidates work for the Principal Learning unit. For portfolio evidence at this level, the candidate must carry out at least one activity that shows their skills in the process as a whole, ie covering all three components of the unit. ICT As with Application of Number, the ESW standards emphasise the importance of using ICT in context and for a purpose. The Amplification of evidence requirements specifically states that You must demonstrate your ICT skills in the context of these activities; demonstrating your skills in isolation cannot be used as evidence. Also similarly to Application of Number, the learner, while developing their ICT skills, is likely to focus on parts of the process and on specific skills, but they should always have the big picture in mind and build towards seeing the process as a whole. For the portfolio, the Amplification states that: You must carry out at least two activities that, overall: show that you can plan and carry through a number of different activities, one of which must be a complex activity covering ICT3.1, ICT3.2 and ICT3.3. While much of the portfolio evidence may be presented electronically and/or as printouts, it is essential that it shows the processes the candidate used to confirm their understanding of their task, to select, enter and develop information, and to present their work. This will normally involve drafting, revising, correcting, redrafting or reformatting the work. This is therefore an important aspect of developing ESW ICT, and the evidence submitted for assessment must include at least one complete draft with notes, annotations, highlighting, alterations etc. The final printouts, presentations etc are not, on their own, sufficient as evidence, though they must be included in the portfolio.
The wider key skills All three of the wider key skills require the candidate to learn and to demonstrate the process skills of: Planning Doing Reviewing.
Each component of this process can be learned and developed separately, though portfolio evidence must cover all three components of the qualification in a single activity. Working with Others at Level 3 requires that the example in the portfolio shows that the learner can work as part of a group or team made up of at least three people (i.e. the learner works with at least two other people). The learner must become conscious of and focus on their own skills and how they relate to others if they are to develop their ability to contribute effectively to a team project or activity. They must be able to review their work with others, identify factors that influenced the outcome and agree how to improve their teamworking skills for the future. The evidence in a candidates portfolio must show their individual contribution to the work of the group. Problem Solving is a skill that many younger learners do not at first recognise as a skill that, like other skills, involves learning and developing specialised techniques. The learner has to identify and analyse a problem (which must be individual to them, not a group activity), come up with different ways of tackling it and choose one, make a plan, follow it, and check whether the problem has been solved. They must then review their approach to problem solving. As with Working with Others, each phase can be focused on separately in the learning and development phase, but the portfolio requires two examples, each of which follows though all three components of the qualification. Improving Own Learning and Performance, like the other wider key skills, requires the learner to become consciously aware of how they learn and which ways of learning are most effective for them in different situations. Many learners will have used only one or two ways of learning hitherto and need to be introduced to other possibilities. They must take responsibility for improving their learning and performance, set targets for what they want to learn or do, make a plan with targets, follow the plan, reflect on and review their progress, establish what they have achieved, and agree ways to further improve their performance. Any of the learning outcomes in the Principal Learning unit could provide opportunities to develop IOLP skills, but SMART targets must be set that relate to the purpose of the unit. The portfolio of evidence must include at least one example that covers at least three targets. Overall, the evidence must show at least two different ways of learning.
Suggested context
information feelings opinions questions complex instructions on a range of familiar and unfamiliar topics, using appropriate language and non-verbal communication, and in a range of contexts. (a) Taking part in formal discussions with two or more other people
(b) Giving a talk/presentation of at least eight minutes.
C3.1.2
C3.1.3
Reading
Reading, understanding and synthesising information from at least two documents about the same subject. Each document must be at least 1,000 words long. At least one must contain complex information or reasoning and at least one must contain an image Research information concerning innovative product design and compare them to traditional counterparts in terms of their design/operation, method of manufacture and marketing approach. Synthesis this information into a report.
C3.2 C3.2.1
Writing
Writing two documents of different types, each one giving different information to different audiences about complex subjects in appropriate formats and using language that is appropriate to purpose and audience. One document must be at least 1,000 words long. Produce a report on innovative product design including a comparison to traditional counterparts in terms of design/operation, method of manufacture and marketing approach. Produce a leaflet on successful and entrepreneurial engineering activities.
C3.3 C3.3.1
Suggested context
Following safe, healthy and secure working practices at all times. Finding, selecting and exchanging information Planning how to find the ICT-based and non ICT-based information required. Searching for, evaluating, selecting and getting, from a range of sources, relevant ICT-based and non ICTbased information. Entering, saving, communicating and exchanging ICT-based information to suit the purpose. Developing and presenting information Organising, developing, formatting and combining ICT-based and non ICT-based information from different sources to suit content and purpose, in the form of: a) text b) tables c) images d) numbers e) records. Presenting the final output effectively, using a consistent style and formats and layouts that are appropriate to purpose and audience, using ICT, and reviewing the work.
Plan, search for, select and evaluate ICT based and non ICT based sources concerning innovative product design. Enter, save, communicate and exchange the information to inform a document.
ICT3.2.1
ICT3.1.2
ICT3.1.3
ICT3.3
Use ICT to present combined, organised and formatted ICT and non ICT information, including text, tables, images numbers and records in document on innovative product design including a comparison to traditional counterparts in terms of design/operation, method of manufacture and marketing approach. Review work.
ICT3.3.1
ICT3.3.2
Suggested context
N3.1.2 N3.1.3
N3.2 N3.2.1
Using the data and information obtained to carry out calculations relevant to the task to do with: y) amounts or sizes z) scales or proportion aa) handling statistics bb) using formulae Interpreting results and presenting findings Selecting and justifying two different ways to present results, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams appropriate to audience. Presenting and explaining methods and findings and justifying how they meet the purpose of the task and are appropriate to the audience.
Limited opportunities.
N3.2.2
N3.3 N3.3.1
N3.3.2
Carry out individual responsibilities in the product design and presentation. Producing and sharing delivery of the presentation. Checking progress together to refine the design and presentation.
WO3.2
Reviewing and evaluating individual and group performance, reflecting on the process. Identifying successful features of the group work process and also elements that could be improved.
WO3.3
Suggested context
Setting targets using information from appropriate people to enable the preparation of action points to plan how to produce or improve a design in an innovative way.
Reference LP3.1
LP3.1.1
LP3.1.2 LP3.1.3
LP3.2
LP3.2.1
LP3.2.2
LP3.2.3
LP3.3
LP3.3.1
LP3.3.2 LP3.3.3
Exploring a problem and identifying Identifying, analysing a new design or an improvement to an existing design and different ways of tackling it Identifying, analysing and accurately describing the problem, and agreeing with others how to know it has been solved Selecting and using a variety of methods to come up with different ways of tackling the problem Comparing the main features and risks of each approach, and justifying the method to be used. Planning and implementing at least one way of solving the problem Planning the chosen way of solving the problem and getting the go-ahead from an appropriate person Putting the plan into action, effectively using support and feedback from others to help tackle the problem Checking regularly progress towards solving the problem, revising the approach as necessary. Checking if the problem has been solved and reviewing own approach to problem solving Applying systematically methods agreed with an appropriate person, to check if the problem has been solved Describing fully the results and drawing conclusions on how successful the learner was in solving the problem Reviewing own approach to problem solving, including whether other approaches might have proved more effective.
Using systematic methods to check that the new design or an improvement to an existing design displays innovation in at least two key product features and reviewing own approach to problem solving skills. Planning and implementing a solution to the new design or an improvement to an existing design using support and feedback from others. ways to tackle it.
PS3.1.2
PS3.1.3
PS3.2 PS3.2.1
PS3.2.2
PS3.2.3
PS3.3
PS3.3.1
PS3.3.2
PS3.3.3
Work experience The use of work placements would be ideal for this unit, which would help show the importance of design and innovation to commercial success. If work placements are available, assignments based around the placement would be beneficial. However, it is appreciated that suitable placements are not always available and in-house assignments are just as acceptable. Specialist resources Learners will require Internet access for research and video resources might also be useful, especially for learning outcome 2. Design software might also be used although this is not essential.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 175
Learning outcomes
On completion of this unit, a learner should: LO.1. Know how to use algebraic methods to solve engineering problems. LO.2. Be able to use trigonometric methods to solve engineering problems. LO.3. Be able to use statistical methods to display engineering data. LO.4. Know how to apply elementary calculus techniques to solve engineering problems.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 176
logarithms (log a + log b = log ab, log an = n log a, log a log b = log
(base e), exponential growth and decay. They will need to be able to solve engineering problems, e.g. growth of voltage in a capacitor, decay of current in an inductor, radioactive decay, Taylor's tool life equation, hysteresis loss in a magnetic core, ratio of tensions for a flat belt or vee belt drive. Learners will need to know about linear equations and straight line graphs, linear equations, e.g. y = mx + c; straight line graph (coordinates on a pair of labelled Cartesian axes, positive or negative gradient, intercept, plot of a straight line), simultaneous solution of linear equations. They will need to be able to solve engineering problems, e.g. determination of temperature coefficient, calculation of linear thermal expansion, variation of voltage with current for a resistor, variation of inductive reactance with frequency, load/extension and stress/strain (within linear range), distance/time graphs, force and acceleration. Learners will need to know about factorisation and quadratics, be able to multiply expressions in brackets by a number, symbol or by another expression in a bracket; by extraction of a common factor, eg ax + ay, a(x 1) + b(x 1) ; by grouping, e.g. ax ay + bx by ; quadratic expressions, e.g. a2 + 2ab + b2 ; roots of an equation, e.g. quadratic equations with real roots by factorisation, and by the use of formula, x =
be able to solve engineering problems, e.g. determination of fabrication of enclosures, filling a tank at different rates from two sources, calculation of impedance of an AC load, Brinell hardness number, work done and power transmitted by a constant torque, power transmitted by a belt drive, coefficient of superficial expansion, coefficient of cubic expansion, variation of resistance with temperature, characteristic gas equation, simple harmonic motion, solution of problems involving cables, wires and catenaries.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 177
LO.2
Learners will need to know about circular measure and radian; degree measure to radians and vice versa; angular rotations (multiples of radians); problems involving areas and angles measured in radians; length of arc of a circle ( s= r ); area of a sector (A = r2); and be able to solve engineering problems, eg solution of problems involving shafts, pulleys, material removal rates, curved surfaces, angular velocity, angular acceleration, angle of lap of a belt drive. Learners will need to know about triangular measurement and functions (sine, cosine and tangent); sine/cosine wave over one complete cycle; graph of tan A as A varies from 0 and 360 (tan A = sin A/cos A); values of the trigonometric ratios for angles between 0 and 360; periodic properties of the trigonometric functions; the sine and cosine rule. They will need to be able to solve engineering problems, e.g. calculation of the phasor sum of two alternating currents, resolution of system of coplanar forces, angle of elevation and angle of depression, power factor of an AC load, power factor correction, structures, sloping sides, guys and stays, calculation of angle of visibility of a satellite. Learners will need to know about mensuration: standard formulae to solve surface areas and volumes of regular solids, eg volume of a cylinder = r2h, total surface area of a cylinder = 2 rh + 2 r2, volume of sphere = of a cone =
4 3 r , surface area of a sphere = 4 r 2 , volume 3
height. They will also need to solve engineering problems, eg calculation of surface area and volume of various types of storage vessel, dimensional specification of enclosures, estimating cost of materials, application of conformal and other coatings, determination of radiated power density, illumination of a surface, cone of acceptance for an optical fibre. LO.3 Be able to use statistical methods to display engineering data Learners will need to know about data handling and data represented by statistical diagrams, eg bar charts, pie charts, frequency distributions, class boundaries and class width, frequency table; variables (discrete and continuous); histogram (continuous and discrete variants); cumulative frequency curves; binomial expansion. They will also need to solve engineering problems, eg cost analysis of an engineered product or service, time analysis of an engineered product or service, analysis of production variance, presentation and illustration of measured data, stock and supply levels Learners will need to know about statistical measurement: arithmetic mean; median; mode; discrete and grouped data; they will also need to solve engineering problems, eg mean time to failure (MTTR) and mean time to repair (MTTR), analyses of production data, tolerance of a batch of resistors, quality assurance.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 178
LO.4
Learners will need to know about differentiation and differential coefficient; gradient of a curve y = f(x); rate of change; Leibniz dy notation ( ); differentiation of simple polynomial functions, dx exponential functions and trigonometric functions. They will also need to solve engineering problems, eg determination of acceleration from a velocity/time function, determination of resistance from a voltage/current function, problems involving growth and decay, radioactivity, cooling curves, determination of induced e.m.f. from an applied current/time function, determination of current in a capacitor from an applied voltage/time function, determination of minimum dimensions for a storage vessel or enclosure, determination of flow rate and liquid level in a tank Learners will need to know about integration and integration as reverse of differentiating basic rules for simple polynomial functions, exponential functions and trigonometric functions; indefinite integrals; constant of integration; definite integrals; limits; evaluation of simple polynomial functions; area under a curve, for functions such as y = x(x 3), y = x2 + x + 4. They will also need to solve engineering problems, eg calculation of distance travelled for a given velocity/time function, determination of energy stored for a given power/time function, determination of power in an AC circuit, work done over a distance, braking distance for a vehicle, moment of inertia of a disc, radius of gyration, work done in expansion
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 179
LO.2
LO.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 180
Learning outcome The learner should: Know how to apply elementary calculus techniques to solve engineering problems
Assessment criteria The learner can: Determine the gradient of a curve by constructing a tangent at different points. Identify turning points (maximum, minimum and inflexion) and infers that the gradient will be zero at such a point. Apply the basic rules of calculus to a polynomial or trigonometric expression in order to obtain the derivative function. Apply the basic rules of calculus to a polynomial or trigonometric expression to obtain the integral function.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 181
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 182
In learning outcome 8.4, learners should be introduced to calculus techniques based on typical engineering applications. Learners frequently find this topic difficult and it is therefore essential that they appreciate the practical application of calculus rather than merely seeing it as a mathematical hurdle and a potential barrier to future learning. It is important to note that the external assessment for this unit will require learners to apply appropriate mathematical modelling techniques to the solution of engineering problems. Learners will be expected to apply their knowledge and understanding of mathematics to the solution of a range of practical problems, for example, those involving exponential growth of voltage in a capacitor undergoing charge, change in momentum of a body experiencing an impulse force, moments and centres of mass of a body, power factor and phase angle of a reactive load in an AC circuit. Learners should, at all times, be encouraged to relate their knowledge and understanding of mathematical techniques to the real world of engineering. Close links should therefore be made between this unit and Unit 9: Principles and Application of Engineering Science, and tutors should actively look for opportunities to show how mathematical modelling can be used as a tool to solve real engineering problems. In the external assessment for this unit learners are required to follow the current regulations for calculator use as in GCEs, available from www.jcq.org.uk.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 183
Guidance for Integrating Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Level 3
Skills in applied learning A unique and central feature of Principal Learning (PL) is the requirement that at least 50% must be completed in an applied or work-related context. This means that learners must actively engage with the curriculum they are studying, putting theory into practice and working cooperatively with other learners, with their teachers, and with people from outside the classroom. They should learn in a range of contexts and environments, carrying out investigations and active enquiries, learning through doing and relating their learning to job roles. The skills embodied in the three Essential Skills Wales (ESW) and the three wider key skills (WKS) are therefore integral to the delivery of Principal Learning (PL) at all levels and in all lines of learning. Principal Learning offers many opportunities to develop all six skills (ESW + WKS) that are required if a candidate is to achieve the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ). To achieve the WBQ at Advanced level, learners must achieve three of the six skills at Level 3, one of which must be ESW Communication, Application of Number or ICT, together with the other three skills at Level 2 Developing skills The table below lists, in the first column, the skills that a learner must develop for the ESW or WKS in question. The second column suggests a PL context in which the skill would arise naturally and might be developed. It is important that, when developing an ESW skill, both the learner and the teacher pay close attention to the section in the standards headed In order to show that you are competent. Similarly for the WKS, teachers and learners must study Part A. The third column in the table identifies the ESW or WKS component. Portfolio evidence If a learner is aiming to generate portfolio evidence in the context of a learning activity or assignment in PL, it is important to ensure that the requirements of the assignment match the evidence requirements of the skill qualification (ESW or WKS) in question, in terms of content and of presentation. A portfolio of evidence will often require more than one example of the skill, so teachers will need to identify other contexts and opportunities from the many that exist in the context of the WBQ as a whole. The table below does not include details of these requirements. It is therefore essential that teachers are familiar with: the standards for ESW and the associated documents Amplification of Evidence Requirements (which includes guidance), and Mandatory Definitions, which are available from http://old.accac.org.uk/eng/content.php?mID=752 the standards for the wider key skills and the associated document The key skills qualifications and guidance: working with others, improving own learning and performance and problem solving levels 1-4 2004 (QCA 2004); order ref QCA/04/1294, downloadable from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_6462.aspx .
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 184
It is important to emphasise that candidates may develop these skills and/or generate portfolio evidence from anywhere in their learning programme. It is therefore not necessary, nor expected, that any one unit of Principal Learning should offer development and/or evidence opportunities for all the components of each of the six skills. Where opportunities to develop these skills and to provide portfolio evidence arise naturally in learning contexts, they should be pursued; learning and assignments should not be distorted to include the skills where they do not arise naturally. Essential Skills Wales Communication The ESW standards aim to integrate the different aspects of communication (speaking and listening, reading and writing) and emphasise that communication should be purposeful. So, for example, the purpose of reading might be to inform discussion and/or writing, or a discussion might be part of a candidates preparation for a piece of writing, all in relation to the purpose of the Principal Learning unit. Application of Number The ESW standards emphasise that numbers must be applied and used for the purpose of tackling a problem or task. At Level 3, the standards are structured round the following process: Understand and tackle a problem out calculations Check results findings Reflect/review. Collect and interpret data Interpret results Carry Present
The problem should arise naturally in the context of the candidates work for the Principal Learning unit. For portfolio evidence at this level, the candidate must carry out at least one activity that shows their skills in the process as a whole, ie covering all three components of the unit. ICT As with Application of Number, the ESW standards emphasise the importance of using ICT in context and for a purpose. The Amplification of evidence requirements specifically states that You must demonstrate your ICT skills in the context of these activities; demonstrating your skills in isolation cannot be used as evidence. Also similarly to Application of Number, the learner, while developing their ICT skills, is likely to focus on parts of the process and on specific skills, but they should always have the big picture in mind and build towards seeing the process as a whole. For the portfolio, the Amplification states that: You must carry out at least two activities that, overall: show that you can plan and carry through a number of different activities, one of which must be a complex activity covering ICT3.1, ICT3.2 and ICT3.3. While much of the portfolio evidence may be presented electronically and/or as printouts, it is essential that it shows the processes the candidate used to confirm their understanding of their task, to select, enter and develop information, and to present their work. This will normally involve drafting, revising, correcting, redrafting or reformatting the work. This is therefore an important aspect of developing ESW ICT, and the evidence submitted for assessment must include at least one complete draft with notes, annotations, highlighting, alterations etc. The final printouts, presentations etc are not, on their own, sufficient as evidence, though they must be included in the portfolio.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 185
The wider key skills All three of the wider key skills require the candidate to learn and to demonstrate the process skills of: Planning Doing Reviewing.
Each component of this process can be learned and developed separately, though portfolio evidence must cover all three components of the qualification in a single activity. Working with Others at Level 3 requires that the example in the portfolio shows that the learner can work as part of a group or team made up of at least three people (i.e. the learner works with at least two other people). The learner must become conscious of and focus on their own skills and how they relate to others if they are to develop their ability to contribute effectively to a team project or activity. They must be able to review their work with others, identify factors that influenced the outcome and agree how to improve their teamworking skills for the future. The evidence in a candidates portfolio must show their individual contribution to the work of the group. Problem Solving is a skill that many younger learners do not at first recognise as a skill that, like other skills, involves learning and developing specialised techniques. The learner has to identify and analyse a problem (which must be individual to them, not a group activity), come up with different ways of tackling it and choose one, make a plan, follow it, and check whether the problem has been solved. They must then review their approach to problem solving. As with Working with Others, each phase can be focused on separately in the learning and development phase, but the portfolio requires two examples, each of which follows though all three components of the qualification. Improving Own Learning and Performance, like the other wider key skills, requires the learner to become consciously aware of how they learn and which ways of learning are most effective for them in different situations. Many learners will have used only one or two ways of learning hitherto and need to be introduced to other possibilities. They must take responsibility for improving their learning and performance, set targets for what they want to learn or do, make a plan with targets, follow the plan, reflect on and review their progress, establish what they have achieved, and agree ways to further improve their performance. Any of the learning outcomes in the Principal Learning unit could provide opportunities to develop IOLP skills, but SMART targets must be set that relate to the purpose of the unit. The portfolio of evidence must include at least one example that covers at least three targets. Overall, the evidence must show at least two different ways of learning.
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 186
Suggested context
information feelings opinions questions complex instructions on a range of familiar and unfamiliar topics, using appropriate language and non-verbal communication, and in a range of contexts.
C3.1.2
(a) Taking part in formal discussions with two or more other people
(b) Giving a talk/presentation of at least eight minutes. Limited opportunities.
C3.1.3
Reading
Reading, understanding and synthesising information from at least two documents about the same subject. Each document must be at least 1,000 words long. At least one must contain complex information or reasoning and at least one must contain an image Limited opportunities.
C3.2 C3.2.1
Writing
Writing two documents of different types, each one giving different information to different audiences about complex subjects in appropriate formats and using language that is appropriate to purpose and audience. One document must be at least 1,000 words long. Limited opportunities.
C3.3 C3.3.1
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 187
Suggested context
Following safe, healthy and secure working practices at all times. Finding, selecting and exchanging information Planning how to find the ICT-based and non ICT-based information required. Searching for, evaluating, selecting and getting, from a range of sources, relevant ICT-based and non ICTbased information. Entering, saving, communicating and exchanging ICT-based information to suit the purpose. Developing and presenting information Organising, developing, formatting and combining ICT-based and non ICT-based information from different sources to suit content and purpose, in the form of: a) text b) tables c) images d) numbers e) records. Presenting the final output effectively, using a consistent style and formats and layouts that are appropriate to purpose and audience, using ICT, and reviewing the work.
Limited opportunities.
ICT3.2.1
ICT3.1.2
ICT3.1.3
ICT3.3 ICT3.3.1
ICT3.3.2
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 188
Suggested context
N3.1.2 N3.1.3
N3.2 N3.2.1
Using the data and information obtained to carry out calculations relevant to the task to do with: cc) amounts or sizes dd) scales or proportion ee) handling statistics ff) using formulae Interpreting results and presenting findings Selecting and justifying two different ways to present results, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams appropriate to audience. Presenting and explaining methods and findings and justifying how they meet the purpose of the task and are appropriate to the audience.
problems mathematically.
N3.2.2
N3.3
Justify and explain methods and findings related to engineering problems solved mathematically. Present results in two different ways, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams.
N3.3.1
N3.3.2
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 189
Suggested context
Limited opportunities.
WO3.2
WO3.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 190
Suggested context
Set learning targets and deadlines with a teacher to learn how mathematics is used to solve engineering problems.
Reference LP3.1
LP3.1.1
LP3.1.2 LP3.1.3
LP3.2
LP3.2.1
LP3.2.2
LP3.2.3
LP3.3
LP3.3.1
LP3.3.2 LP3.3.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 191
PS3.1.2
PS3.1.3
PS3.2 PS3.2.1
PS3.2.2
PS3.2.3
PS3.3
PS3.3.1
PS3.3.2
PS3.3.3
LEVEL 3 UNIT 8: MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERS (WALES) 192
Work experience Learners will require access to an approved scientific calculator that supports the direct entry of mathematical notation such as fractions, roots, etc. The approved calculator is not required to provide programmable features nor should it have a graphical display. Learners should be encouraged to develop proficiency using this calculator and it should be available for use during the external assessment. The currently approved calculator is the Casio fx83ES which is widely available at low cost. Reference material Bird J Engineering Mathematics (Newnes, 2007) ISBN 0750657766 Bird J Basic Engineering Mathematics (Newnes, 2005) ISBN 0750665750 Tooley M and Dingle L BTEC National Engineering (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002) ISBN 0750651660
Unit 9: Principles and Application of Engineering Science (Wales) Principal Learning unit Level 3 Guided Learning Hours: 90 Internally assessed About this unit
Many of the goods and services that we use are made available partly due to engineers applying nothing more than basic scientific principles and concepts. For example, the energy that we need to provide light and warmth is often generated many hundreds of miles away from where we live and then transmitted over long distances using high voltages and overhead cables. Without this system every town would need to have its own local power station which would not only be ugly and environmentally unfriendly but also inefficient and inconvenient in the event of a breakdown. This unit provides the essential scientific principles that will help in your study of some other Level 3 units, such as Unit 3: Selection and Application of Engineering Materials (Wales), Unit 4: Instrumentation and Control Engineering (Wales) and Unit 7: Innovative Design and Enterprise (Wales). A good understanding of scientific principles is also an essential prerequisite if you are planning to continue your study of engineering at a higher level.
Learning outcomes
On completion of this unit, a learner should: LO.1. Be able to apply mechanical principles to determine the effects of forces in engineering systems. LO.2. Be able to apply mechanical principles to determine the effects of motion, work and energy transfer in engineering systems. LO.3. Be able to apply electrical principles to determine the effects of electric charge and current and determine the voltage, current, resistance and power in electrical circuits. LO.4. Be able to apply the principles of heat and thermodynamics to determine the effects of expansion and compression of gases and energy transfer in engineering systems. LO.5. Know about the principles of chemistry and the effects of chemical processes and reactions. LO.6. Be able to apply the principles of fluid dynamics to determine the effects of viscosity and the forces acting in hydrostatic systems.
LO.2
Be able to apply mechanical principles to determine the effects of motion, work and energy transfer in engineering systems
LO.3
Be able to apply electrical principles to determine the effects of electric charge and current and determine the voltage, current, resistance and power in electrical circuits
Learners will need to learn about the nature of electricity, charges at rest and in motion, electric current as flow of charge and be able to solve related engineering problems, e.g. the relationship between charge, current and time, e.g. Q = It. Learners will need to understand electrostatics and the nature of an electric field in terms of the motion of a free positive charge and will need to be able to solve related engineering problems, e.g. the relationship between charge and electric potential, electric field strength (potential gradient = V/d). They will need to know about the nature of electric charge, electric field patterns between isolated bodies with similar and dissimilar polarities, electric field pattern between two parallel metal plates and be able to solve engineering problems involving the force between two charges, e.g. F = Q1Q2 / kd2. Learners will need to know about magnetism and the nature of a magnetic field in terms of the motion of a free north pole and be able to solve related engineering problems, eg the field around a current carrying conductor, field around a single turn loop, field around a solenoid. They will need to know about the comparison of the field around a solenoid with that of a permanent bar magnet and be able to solve engineering problems, eg the force around a current carrying conductor, F = B I l; electromagnetic induction, induced electromotive force (emf); coupled inductors; Lenzs and Faradays laws. They should also be able to explain the basic principles and construction of generators and motors. Learners will need to gain an understanding of DC circuits and the definition of potential difference and emf. They will solve engineering problems involving specific resistance (resistivity) and resistance, eg R = l/A, voltage and resistance in a simple circuit consisting of a source of emf and a single resistance. They will also need to be able to solve engineering problems involving Ohms law and the relationship between voltage, current and resistance, eg V = I R, R = V / I, and I = V / R. Learners will solve engineering problems involving series and parallel circuits (with up to four resistances) and combined series/parallel circuits (with up to four resistances and three branches). They will need to know about Kirchhoffs Voltage Law, Kirchhoffs Current Law and be able to solve engineering problems involving Kirchhoffs Laws and be able to determine the power in a DC circuit in terms of current, voltage and resistance, eg P = I V, P = I2 R, P = V2/R. Learners will need to know about alternating current and how to solve engineering problems involving the voltage induced in a loop of wire rotating at constant velocity in a uniform magnetic field, eg e = B l v sin . They will need to know about sinusoidal voltage and current, definitions of amplitude (or peak value), peak-peak, rms and average values of a sinusoidal voltage taken over a half-cycle and the definitions and relationships between period (or periodic time). Learners will need to solve engineering problems involving angular velocity and frequency, eg f = 1/t, t = 1/f, = 2 f, voltage and current in an AC circuit containing pure resistance, and be able to solve engineering problems involving power in an AC circuit in terms of current, voltage and resistance, eg P = I V, P = I2 R, P = V2/R.Learners will need to understand transformers and transformer principle (ideal or loss-free only considered), step-up and step-down types, and be able to solve engineering problems involving voltage and turns ratio, eg Np/Ns = Vp/Vs = Is/Ip and turns-per-volt.
LO.4.
Be able to apply the principles of heat and thermodynamics to determine the effects of expansion and compression of gases and energy transfer in engineering systems
Learners will learn about heat energy and elementary molecular definition of solids, liquids and gases temperature, temperature scales, specific heat capacity, specific latent heat, linear and volumetric expansivity. They will need to solve engineering problems, e.g. gas laws, transfer of heat energy, change of state, expansion of solids and liquids. Learners will need to understand expansion and compression of gases and polytropic processes, process parameters and relationships, eg absolute pressure, absolute temperature, volume, universal gas constant, molecular weight, characteristic gas constant, general gas equation (pV/T = constant), characteristic gas equation (pV = mRT), polytropic process equation (pVn = constant), value of n for isolbaric processes (n = 0), isothermal processes (n = 1), adiabatic processes (n = ). Learners will need to solve engineering problems involving expansion and compression of gases, eg volume, pressure and temperature of a gas. Learners will also learn about energy transfer in thermodynamic systems, closed thermodynamic systems, work transfer, e.g. general expression for a polytropic process, isothermal work transfer. They will cover heat transfer, eg specific heat capacities at constant volume and constant pressure, application of first law of thermodynamics, expression for change of internal energy, closed system energy equation, relationship between system constants cv, cp, and R. Learners will need to know about systems, e.g. internal combustion engine cylinders, positive pressure compressors; and will cover open thermodynamic systems, work transfer, e.g. general expression for a polytropic process, isothermal work transfer; heat transfer, e.g. application of first law of thermodynamics, expression for change of enthalpy, open system energy equation; systems, eg gas turbines, rotary compressors, coolers. Learners will also need to be able to solve engineering problems involving thermodynamic systems, eg energy and work output in an heat engine.
LO.5
Know about the principles of chemistry and the effects of chemical processes and reactions
Learners will need to understand chemical principles such as organic chemistry, chemical structure and bonding, chemical symbols and formulae, enthalpy change, definition of units, exothermic and endothermic reactions. Learners will learn about reactions and industrial applications, alkanes (e.g. crude oil as the source of hydrocarbons), alkenes and aromatic compounds. They will cover the properties and behaviour of arenes (e.g. benzene) including combustion, treatment with bromine and acids, alkylation of benzene by the Friedel Crafts reaction. Learners will need to know about methods of producing industrial benzene, eg catalytic reforming, toluene hydrodealkylation, steam cracking. They will understand the uses of benzene in chemical manufacture, eg styrene (polymer and plastics production), phenol (resins and adhesives), cyclohexane (in the manufacture of nylon), rubbers, lubricants, dyes, detergents, drugs, explosives. Learners will be able to describe and explain industrial processes associated with petrochemicals. Learners will also gain a knowledge of the properties and behaviour of phenols including combustion, solubility, treatment with sodium, aqueous sodium hydroxide, aqueous sodium carbonate. They will learn about ester formation, and be able to describe and explain industrial processes associated with phenols.
LO.6
Be able to apply the principles of fluid dynamics to determine the effects of viscosity and the forces acting in hydrostatic systems
Learners will need to know about the characteristics and behaviour of fluids, surface tension, capillary actions, viscosity and viscous behaviour, eg dynamic viscosity, kinematic viscosity, effect of shearing in Newtonian fluids (water, lubricating oils) and non-Newtonian fluids (pseudoplastic, Bingham plastic, Casson plastic, dilatent). Learners will also need to understand bearings, eg plain journal, plain thrust; system parameters, eg bearing dimensions, speed, viscosity of lubricant, power loss, and be able to solve engineering problems involving fluids. Learners will need to know about forces in hydrostatic systems hydraulic devices, eg hydraulic jack, hydraulic press, hydraulic braking system, system parameters, eg cylinder dimensions, input and output forces, internal pressure, and be able to solve engineering problems involving hydrostatic systems. Learners will need to know about immersed surfaces, eg retaining walls of tanks and reservoirs, lock and sluice gates, immersed rectangular and circular covers and hatches; system parameters, eg surface dimensions, depth of immersion, hydrostatic pressure and thrust, centre of pressure; and be able to solve engineering problems involving immersed surfaces. Learners will need to understand principles of fluid flow, eg equation of continuity of mass, equation of continuity of volume for incompressible flow, Bernoulli's equation, D'Arcy's equation. Learners will learn about systems and devices, eg pipes of various sections and levels (such as an inclined tapering pipe); flow measurement, e.g. venturi meter, orifice meter, Pitot tube; aerodynamic profiles (eg spoilers, aircraft wings); and be able to describe and explain engineering applications of fluid flow.
LO.2
Be able to apply mechanical principles to determine the effects of motion, work and energy transfer in engineering systems Be able to apply electrical principles to determine the effects of electric charge and current and determine the voltage, current, resistance and power in electrical circuits Be able to apply the principles of heat and thermodynamics to determine the effects of expansion and compression of gases and energy transfer in engineering systems Know about the principles of chemistry and the effects of chemical processes and reactions
LO.3
LO.4
LO.5
Describe and explain the chemical composition, properties and industrial applications, reactions and methods used for producing arenes and phenols and describe and explain industrial processes associated with petrochemicals. Solve practical engineering problems involving fluids at rest and in motion using fluid flow equations.
LO.6
Be able to apply the principles of fluid dynamics to determine the effects of viscosity and the forces acting in hydrostatic systems
How you will be assessed This unit will focus on your ability to apply scientific principles to the solution of practical engineering problems. Your tutor will set an assignment for you to complete which will comprise of different tasks and activities. These tasks will cover all of the scientific principles that you will have studied. At least some of these tasks will be set in a laboratory and they will provide you with an opportunity to carry out some practical 'hands on' engineering science investigations. Your tutor will provide you with the guidance necessary to complete each task. You will receive a full briefing about the assignment and tasks well in advance of the date it is due for completion. This will allow you to carry out some preparatory background reading and research. You will be expected to complete the individual tasks under controlled conditions (usually during normal class teaching periods). All work must be completed by the end of the time allowed and handed to your tutor for marking. Your tutor will provide you with guidance on what is required and in what form it should be presented (note that assignments may often involve some practical laboratory work or an investigation of some item of hardware). You will often be required to illustrate your work with sketches, diagrams, charts and tables. Where problems have numerical solutions you will be required to show full working and state any assumptions made. Task 1 covering assessment foci 1 and 2 could be based on activities involving coplanar forces and an investigation of Newton's laws of motion, or could be based on a scenario in which you solve a problem involving linear and angular motion. Task 2 covering assessment focus 3 could be based on an investigation of a series/parallel circuit. Task 3 covering assessment foci 4 and 6 could be based on practical activities and problems based on energy transfer in a thermodynamic system and an investigation of the forces acting in hydrostatic systems. The evidence you generate for these first three tasks will be submitted in separate process portfolios. Task 4 covering assessment focus 5 could be based on an investigation of a petrochemical process. The evidence should be submitted in a report.
Marking grid
Assessment focus LO.1 Be able to apply mechanical principles to determine the effects of forces in engineering systems Mark Band 1 Solves a system of two perpendicular coplanar forces and applies the principle of moments to a loaded system. Mark Band 2 Solves a system of three nonperpendicular coplanar forces and determines the conditions for static equilibrium for a loaded beam. Mark Band 3 Solves a system of four nonperpendicular coplanar forces, determines the conditions for static equilibrium for a loaded beam, and determines beam reactions due to loading. Maximum marks available
(04) LO.2 Be able to apply mechanical principles to determine the effects of motion, work and energy transfer in engineering systems Solves practical engineering problems involving linear motion and applies Newton's laws of motion.
(57) Solves practical engineering problems involving linear motion and angular motion, applies Newtons laws of motion, and applies the principle of conservation of energy.
(810) Solves practical engineering problems involving linear and angular motion and friction, applies Newtons laws of motion, applies the principles of conservation of energy and conservation of momentum.
10
(04)
(57)
(810)
10
Assessment focus LO.3 Be able to apply electrical principles to determine the effects of electric charge and current and determine the voltage, current, resistance and power in electrical circuits
Mark Band 1 Solves practical engineering problems involving direct current circuits with a single source and load.
Mark Band 2 Solves practical engineering problems involving direct current circuits with up to three series/parallel-branches and applies basic principles of electromagnetism.
Mark Band 3 Solves practical engineering problems involving direct current circuits with up to three series/parallel-branches, applies the principles of electromagnetism and electromagnetic coupling (i.e. a transformer connected between an AC source and a purely resistive load), and solves a practical engineering problem involving an AC circuit in which only pure resistance is present. (810) Solves practical engineering problems involving heat, applies thermodynamics to the expansion and compression of gases, and applies the first law of thermodynamics.
(05) LO.4 Be able to apply the principles of heat and thermodynamics to determine the effects of expansion and compression of gases and energy transfer in engineering systems Solves practical engineering problems involving heat and thermodynamics.
(67) Solves practical engineering problems involving heat and applies thermodynamics to the expansion and compression of gases.
10
(04)
(57)
(810)
10
Assessment focus LO.5 Know about the principles of chemistry and the effects of chemical processes and reactions
Mark Band 1 Describes the chemical composition, properties and industrial applications of arenes and phenols.
Mark Band 2 Describes and explains the chemical composition, properties, industrial applications, reactions and methods of producing arenes and phenols.
Mark Band 3 Describes and explains the chemical composition, properties, industrial applications, reactions, methods of production, and industrial processes associated with petrochemicals. (810) Solves practical engineering problems involving fluids at rest and in motion, and applies Bernouli's and D'Arcy's equations.
(04) Solves practical engineering LO.6 Be able to apply problems involving fluids at the principles of rest. fluid dynamics to determine the effects of viscosity and the forces acting in hydrostatic systems (04)
(57) Solves practical engineering problems involving fluids at rest and in motion.
10
(57)
(810)
10 Total marks 60
Assessment guidance
Using the marking grid Each internally assessed unit has 60 available marks in total. In some units the marking grid has been split into two grids A and B. Marking grid A contains all of the marking criteria for the unit except those which assess a learners performance in practical activities which are recorded as a witness testimony or observation record. These make up grid B. Centres must ensure that learners undertake appropriate assessment tasks to enable them to achieve the requirements of each units marking grid(s). The basic principle is that this is a best fit grid i.e. the assessor must match the overall standard of work for an assessment focus to a band. It is NOT a hurdle approach, whereby the assessor cannot award marks from the next mark band if one item for an assessment focus from a lower mark band has been omitted, regardless of the quality of the rest of the work for that assessment focus. If a learner completes all they are asked to do in a band for an assessment focus, they can be awarded the full marks for that mark band. If a learner has clearly done more on one aspect of work for an assessment focus required by a mark band, the assessor should consider whether the learner can be awarded marks from the bottom of the next mark band. If a learner has completed less than required in any aspect of work for an assessment focus, or indeed omitted an aspect, then the mark moves down within the mark band. Marking is completely separate for each assessment focus i.e. a learner can get mark band 3 on one assessment focus, mark band 1 on another etc, then all marks are added together for the unit total. It may be possible, depending on weighting of an assessment focus for a learner to pass a unit even if 0 has been given in marks for one assessment focus in the unit. A 0 mark should be used only where a learner provides no valid evidence. Any work that starts to address the requirements of the grid should normally be awarded at least one mark. Evidence generated for marking grid A will be moderated. This must be in the form of hard evidence which a moderator can reassess, such as learner produced written documents (e.g. short question answers, multiple choice question answers, materials from presentations, research notes), videos (dated) of practical activities or artefacts. Marks gained from marking grid A will be reported separately from those gained from marking grid B.
Assessment focus LO.3 Mark Band 13 (0-10 marks) Up to 5 marks can be awarded when the learner solves a practical engineering problem involving a direct current circuit. For example, the learner is able to determine the resistance of a circuit comprising three resistors connected in series-parallel (1 mark) and then uses Ohm's law to determine the current supplied (1 mark) and hence the total power dissipated (1 mark) and finally uses Kirchhoff's laws to determine the voltage dropped across each resistor (1 mark) and the current flowing in each resistor (1 mark). Up to 2 marks can be awarded when the learner solves a practical engineering problem involving magnetism. For example, the learner determines the force (1 mark) acting on a current carrying conductor given values of flux density, effective length and applied current. By using a labelled sketch and brief written explanation the learner shows how this effect can be used to from the basis of a simple electric motor (1 mark). Up to 3 marks can be awarded when the learner solves a practical engineering problem involving alternating current circuits and transformers. For example, the learner determines the e.m.f. induced (1 mark) across the ends of a conductor moving in a magnetic field at a given angle, flux density, and effective conductor length. By using a labelled sketch and brief written explanation the learner shows how this effect can be used to from the basis of a simple AC generator (1 mark). The learner determines the secondary voltage and power produced in a resistive load connected to a transformer when given values of primary voltage, turns ratio and secondary load resistance (the transformer assumed to be loss-free) (1 mark).
Assessment focus LO.4 Mark Band 13 (0-10 marks) Up to 2 marks can be awarded when the learner solves a practical engineering problem involving heat and thermodynamics. For example, the learner determines the energy required (1 mark) to convert a given mass of ice at 0C to water at 0C and then determines the heat energy to raise the mass to a given temperature (1 mark). Up to 2 marks can be awarded when the learner also calculates the change in length (1 mark) and volume (1 mark) of a metal bar of given coefficient of linear expansion and dimensions. Up to 2 marks can be awarded when the learner solves a practical engineering problem involving the expansion of a gas. For example, the learner determined the characteristic gas constant (1 mark) and specific heat capacity at constant pressure (1 mark) of a given mass and volume of gas at a given temperature. The learner also determines the volume of gas if the mass of gas is heated to a different temperature (1 mark). Up to 3 marks can be awarded when the learner solves a practical engineering problem involving energy transfer in a thermodynamic system. For example, the learner determines the magnitude (2 marks) and direction (1 mark) of the work done when a fluid enters and leaves a horizontal steady flow system with given enthalpies and kinetic energies.
Assessment focus LO.5 Mark Band 13 (0-10 marks) Up to 4 marks can be awarded when the learner describes the chemical composition, properties and industrial applications of arenes and phenols. For example, the learner describes the use of benzene in chemical manufacture with specific mention of styrene in the production of plastics (1 mark) and phenol in resins and adhesives (1 mark). The learner describes that arenes and phenols are based on benzene ring and the structure of benzene and phenol (1 mark) and their characteristic properties (1 mark). Up to 3 marks can be awarded when the learner explains a chemical reaction and method of producing an arene and phenol. For example, the learner explains the alkylation of benzene (1 mark) using the Friedel Crafts reaction (2 marks). For full marks at mark band 2 the learner explains the chemical reaction and method of producing a specific arene and phenol by referring to their chemical composition and properties, and showing how these have led to the resulting reaction and influenced the development of the relevant industrial process. The lower end of this mark band must still be characterised by answers that are explanatory rather than descriptive in nature. Up to 3 marks can be awarded when the learner describes and explains an industrial process associated with a petrochemical. For example, the learner uses an appropriate diagram (1 mark) and written explanation (1 mark) for catalytic reforming of industrial benzene (1 mark). For credit in mark band 3 the emphasis must be on industrial processing of petrochemicals. Responses that do not get this across clearly should be restricted to mark band 2.
Assessment focus LO.6 Mark Band 13 (0-10 marks) The learner solves a practical engineering problem involving static fluids. For example, the learner determines the pressure (2 marks) in a water pipe given the difference in height of the columns of fluid in a manometer tube, the density of the fluid in the tube, and the atmospheric pressure. The learner also determines the difference in height (2 marks) of the columns of fluid in the manometer tube when the atmospheric pressure is reduced by a given amount. Up to 3 marks can be awarded when the learner is able to solve a practical engineering problem involving immersed surfaces. For example, the learner determines the pressure (2 marks) and force (1 mark) acting on a flat plate of given surface area immersed at a given depth in fluid of given specific density. Up to 3 marks can be awarded when the learner is able to solve a practical engineering problem involving fluid dynamics. For example, the learner is able to determine the velocity (2 marks) and volume of water (1 mark) that will escape from a large open-top tank in a given time through an opening of given diameter and depth below the water level.
Approaches to assessment Due to the diverse nature of the content, this unit will have to be assessed through a number of different individual tasks. These can typically involve learners carrying out experimental laboratory work, analysing data, and solving problems. It is recommended that tasks should include a significant proportion of 'hands-on' practical work as well as problem solving. Tasks should be carried out under controlled conditions and they should be time constrained. A typical task should be completed in under three hours. Before carrying out a particular task, learners should be provided with a detailed verbal and written briefing together with an opportunity to ask questions. Safety aspects of work to be carried out by learners should be emphasised during the briefing session and any specific hazards should be identified. The initial briefing (which may be given to all learners in a group situation) should not be classed as 'initial direction' or 'initial guidance'. The briefing should include: the title and purpose of the work or the detailed statement of a problem all required information (such as a table of material properties) the resources available to learners (and their location if not immediately accessible) the way that marks will be allocated the nature of the evidence that learners should present (eg tabulated data, graphs, calculations, diagrams, annotated photographs, etc) the time available for completion. Learners should be reminded that they should complete the assessment without plagiarism and within the allocated time. This unit clearly has several distinctive areas of study spread over 90 hours of guided learning which means that the assessment should be through the use of different tasks addressing all aspects of the unit. This means that the tasks can be spread over the duration of the delivery of the unit in a more even manner. Task 1 could cover assessment foci 1 and 2. An activity for 1 could be based on work involving coplanar forces. For example, learners could be asked to carry out an analysis of the forces acting on the jib and supporting superstructure of a tower crane. They could be given photographs, scale drawings, and specifications and then be asked to use them to determine the forces in cables for maximum rated load, optimum counter-balance load, reaction on supporting tower, etc. Tutors should emphasise the link to Unit 3 for determining tensile load in cables. A further practical activity covering assessment focus 2 might be based on an investigation of Newton's laws of motion and the principles of conservation of momentum and energy, or on a scenario in which learners solve problems involving linear and angular motion (for example, a tracked vehicle moving up an inclined plane and the number of revolutions of a flywheel), conservation of energy (for example, involving a mass sliding down a frictionless ramp), and conservation of momentum (for example, involving a collision between two vehicles of given mass and velocity). Evidence for this task should be submitted in a process portfolio.
Task 2 covering assessment focus 3 could be based on a combination of practical activities and problem solving. Practical activities could involve the solution of a series-parallel network (checking measured results by applying Ohms law and Kirchhoffs laws) and the investigation of a transformer-coupled AC circuit in which a low-voltage AC bench supply delivers power to a resistive load (checking measured result by applying relevant transformer equations). Problem solving could involve (a) determining the force on a current carrying conductor when moving at a constant velocity through a field of given flux density and (b) determining the emf generated across the ends of a conductor when it moves through a field of given flux density. Learners could then be asked to explain (with the aid of appropriate sketches) how these two effects respectively underpin the principle of the DC motor and the AC generator. Evidence for this task should be submitted in a process portfolio. Task 3 could cover assessment focus 4 and 6. An activity for 4 could be based on a combination of practical work and problem solving based on energy transfer in thermodynamic systems. Learners could be asked to analyse the energy in a system when a given mass of ice is converted to water at a given temperature and the change in length that occurs when a metal bar of given dimension and coefficient of linear expansion is heated. Further activities could involve the determination of gas constant from data supplied when a given mass of gas is allowed to expand at given pressure and temperature and determination of the work done when a fluid enters and leaves a horizontal steady flow system with given enthalpies and kinetic energies. The task for 6 could be based on static and dynamic systems involving fluids. Learners could be asked to measure the static pressure in a system using a simple manometer arrangement and then to check their results by calculation. They could also be asked to determine the pressure and force acting on a flat plate of given surface area immersed in a given depth of fluid of given density as well as determining the velocity and volume of water that would escape from an open-top tank in a given time from an opening of given diameter and depth below water level. In both cases, learners could be given photographs, sketches or scale drawings to work from. Evidence for this task should be submitted in a process portfolio. Task 4 covering assessment focus 5 could be based on an investigation of a petrochemical process involving, for example, production of industrial benzene. This could be based on a video or industrial visit and involve an explanation of the process and underlying chemical reactions. Because this task is based on research and investigation carried out by the learner, evidence should be submitted in the form of a report.
Guidance for teaching this unit Delivery guidance This unit is 90 guided learning hours (GLH) in length. Centres should allocate this amount of time within the timetable for its delivery and assessment. WJEC/Edexcel has identified that within this time learners will probably require 30 GLH in activities which generate evidence for assessment. This may, for example, include time spent in experiential learning, practising skills, research activities and undertaking summative assessment activities. (See sections relating to Internal assessment and Programme design and delivery in the generic introductory part of the Guidance and units document.) This unit provides the underpinning scientific knowledge that learners will need to fully understand much of the work covered in other Level 3 units. There are significant links between the learning outcomes and centres should ensure that these links are emphasised. In particular, learners need to understand that many practical engineering systems involve mechanical and electrical components working together. Delivery strategies should be developed that will ensure that essential system concepts (such as power, energy and efficiency) are applicable in both mechanical and electrical contexts. Later, when investigating engineering systems as part of learning outcome 4, learners should be encouraged to look back at the work carried out previously in learning outcomes 1 and 2. Learning outcomes 1 and 2 are likely to be delivered by formal lecture, discussion, demonstration and problem solving exercises (both on a class and individual learner basis). learning outcome 3 can be integrated into the delivery of the first two outcomes. Learners should be introduced to problem solving at the earliest possible stage. They should also be encouraged to make use of a variety problem solving techniques including the use of formulae, graphical and computer analysis. Learners should be encouraged to put into practice the mathematical concepts that they have learned from their study of Unit 4 (which could be taken concurrently with this unit). More complex problem solving can be introduced when learners have been become familiar with the basic concepts and have had an opportunity to develop competence in the use of mathematics. In relation to all four outcomes, every attempt should be made to enhance learning through use of appropriate laboratory work. The content of the outcomes has been designed to reflect the likely learning support time spent on them. It is envisaged that learning outcomes 1 and 2 will each require around 30% of the overall learning support time dedicated to the unit, leaving 20% to cover learning outcome 3 and 20% for learning outcome 4. This unit has obvious analytical links with Unit 8: Mathematical Techniques and Applications for Engineers and both of these units should ideally be delivered concurrently. Regular and meaningful liaison between the tutors for these two units is essential. Opportunities for bringing mathematical theory to life should be sought on an ongoing basis.
Guidance for Integrating Essential Skills Wales and Wider Key Skills Level 3
Skills in applied learning A unique and central feature of Principal Learning (PL) is the requirement that at least 50% must be completed in an applied or work-related context. This means that learners must actively engage with the curriculum they are studying, putting theory into practice and working cooperatively with other learners, with their teachers, and with people from outside the classroom. They should learn in a range of contexts and environments, carrying out investigations and active enquiries, learning through doing and relating their learning to job roles. The skills embodied in the three Essential Skills Wales (ESW) and the three wider key skills (WKS) are therefore integral to the delivery of Principal Learning (PL) at all levels and in all lines of learning. Principal Learning offers many opportunities to develop all six skills (ESW + WKS) that are required if a candidate is to achieve the Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification (WBQ). To achieve the WBQ at Advanced level, learners must achieve three of the six skills at Level 3, one of which must be ESW Communication, Application of Number or ICT, together with the other three skills at Level 2 Developing skills The table below lists, in the first column, the skills that a learner must develop for the ESW or WKS in question. The second column suggests a PL context in which the skill would arise naturally and might be developed. It is important that, when developing an ESW skill, both the learner and the teacher pay close attention to the section in the standards headed In order to show that you are competent. Similarly for the WKS, teachers and learners must study Part A. The third column in the table identifies the ESW or WKS component. Portfolio evidence If a learner is aiming to generate portfolio evidence in the context of a learning activity or assignment in PL, it is important to ensure that the requirements of the assignment match the evidence requirements of the skill qualification (ESW or WKS) in question, in terms of content and of presentation. A portfolio of evidence will often require more than one example of the skill, so teachers will need to identify other contexts and opportunities from the many that exist in the context of the WBQ as a whole. The table below does not include details of these requirements. It is therefore essential that teachers are familiar with: the standards for ESW and the associated documents Amplification of Evidence Requirements (which includes guidance), and Mandatory Definitions, which are available from http://old.accac.org.uk/eng/content.php?mID=752 the standards for the wider key skills and the associated document The key skills qualifications and guidance: working with others, improving own learning and performance and problem solving levels 1-4 2004 (QCA 2004); order ref QCA/04/1294, downloadable from http://www.qca.org.uk/qca_6462.aspx .
It is important to emphasise that candidates may develop these skills and/or generate portfolio evidence from anywhere in their learning programme. It is therefore not necessary, nor expected, that any one unit of Principal Learning should offer development and/or evidence opportunities for all the components of each of the six skills. Where opportunities to develop these skills and to provide portfolio evidence arise naturally in learning contexts, they should be pursued; learning and assignments should not be distorted to include the skills where they do not arise naturally. Essential Skills Wales Communication The ESW standards aim to integrate the different aspects of communication (speaking and listening, reading and writing) and emphasise that communication should be purposeful. So, for example, the purpose of reading might be to inform discussion and/or writing, or a discussion might be part of a candidates preparation for a piece of writing, all in relation to the purpose of the Principal Learning unit. Application of Number The ESW standards emphasise that numbers must be applied and used for the purpose of tackling a problem or task. At Level 3, the standards are structured round the following process: Understand and tackle a problem Collect and interpret data Carry out calculations Check results Interpret results findings Reflect/review. Present
The problem should arise naturally in the context of the candidates work for the Principal Learning unit. For portfolio evidence at this level, the candidate must carry out at least one activity that shows their skills in the process as a whole, ie covering all three components of the unit. ICT As with Application of Number, the ESW standards emphasise the importance of using ICT in context and for a purpose. The Amplification of evidence requirements specifically states that You must demonstrate your ICT skills in the context of these activities; demonstrating your skills in isolation cannot be used as evidence. Also similarly to Application of Number, the learner, while developing their ICT skills, is likely to focus on parts of the process and on specific skills, but they should always have the big picture in mind and build towards seeing the process as a whole. For the portfolio, the Amplification states that: You must carry out at least two activities that, overall: show that you can plan and carry through a number of different activities, one of which must be a complex activity covering ICT3.1, ICT3.2 and ICT3.3. While much of the portfolio evidence may be presented electronically and/or as printouts, it is essential that it shows the processes the candidate used to confirm their understanding of their task, to select, enter and develop information, and to present their work. This will normally involve drafting, revising, correcting, redrafting or reformatting the work. This is therefore an important aspect of developing ESW ICT, and the evidence submitted for assessment must include at least one complete draft with notes, annotations, highlighting, alterations etc. The final printouts, presentations etc are not, on their own, sufficient as evidence, though they must be included in the portfolio.
The wider key skills All three of the wider key skills require the candidate to learn and to demonstrate the process skills of: Planning Doing Reviewing.
Each component of this process can be learned and developed separately, though portfolio evidence must cover all three components of the qualification in a single activity. Working with Others at Level 3 requires that the example in the portfolio shows that the learner can work as part of a group or team made up of at least three people (i.e. the learner works with at least two other people). The learner must become conscious of and focus on their own skills and how they relate to others if they are to develop their ability to contribute effectively to a team project or activity. They must be able to review their work with others, identify factors that influenced the outcome and agree how to improve their teamworking skills for the future. The evidence in a candidates portfolio must show their individual contribution to the work of the group. Problem Solving is a skill that many younger learners do not at first recognise as a skill that, like other skills, involves learning and developing specialised techniques. The learner has to identify and analyse a problem (which must be individual to them, not a group activity), come up with different ways of tackling it and choose one, make a plan, follow it, and check whether the problem has been solved. They must then review their approach to problem solving. As with Working with Others, each phase can be focused on separately in the learning and development phase, but the portfolio requires two examples, each of which follows though all three components of the qualification. Improving Own Learning and Performance, like the other wider key skills, requires the learner to become consciously aware of how they learn and which ways of learning are most effective for them in different situations. Many learners will have used only one or two ways of learning hitherto and need to be introduced to other possibilities. They must take responsibility for improving their learning and performance, set targets for what they want to learn or do, make a plan with targets, follow the plan, reflect on and review their progress, establish what they have achieved, and agree ways to further improve their performance. Any of the learning outcomes in the Principal Learning unit could provide opportunities to develop IOLP skills, but SMART targets must be set that relate to the purpose of the unit. The portfolio of evidence must include at least one example that covers at least three targets. Overall, the evidence must show at least two different ways of learning.
Suggested context
C3.1.2
information feelings opinions questions complex instructions on a range of familiar and unfamiliar topics, using appropriate language and non-verbal communication, and in a range of contexts.
(a) Taking part in formal discussions with two or more other people
(b) Giving a talk/presentation of at least eight minutes.
C3.1.3
Reading
Reading, understanding and synthesising information from at least two documents about the same subject. Each document must be at least 1,000 words long. At least one must contain complex information or reasoning and at least one must contain an image
Identify and synthesise the information from two documents to find out about the application of mechanical principles to determine the effects of forces in engineering systems.
C3.2 C3.2.1
Writing
Writing two documents of different types, each one giving different information to different audiences about complex subjects in appropriate formats and using language that is appropriate to purpose and audience. One document must be at least 1,000 words long.
Prepare and deliver a formal presentation on the principles of chemistry and the effects of chemical processes and reactions.
C3.3 C3.3.1
Suggested context
ICT3.1.2 ICT3.1.3
Following safe, healthy and secure working practices at all times. Finding, selecting and exchanging information Planning how to find the ICT-based and non ICT-based information required. Searching for, evaluating, selecting and getting, from a range of sources, relevant ICT-based and non ICTbased information. Entering, saving, communicating and exchanging ICT-based information to suit the purpose. Developing and presenting information Organising, developing, formatting and combining ICT-based and non ICT-based information from different sources to suit content and purpose, in the form of: a) text b) tables c) images d) numbers e) records. Presenting the final output effectively, using a consistent style and formats and layouts that are appropriate to purpose and audience, using ICT, and reviewing the work.
Limited opportunities. Limited opportunities.
ICT3.2 ICT3.2.1
ICT3.1.2
ICT3.1.3
ICT3.3 ICT3.3.1
ICT3.3.2
Suggested context
N3.1.2 N3.1.3
N3.2 N3.2.1
Using the data and information obtained to carry out calculations relevant to the task to do with: gg) amounts or sizes hh) scales or proportion ii) handling statistics jj) using formulae Interpreting results and presenting findings Selecting and justifying two different ways to present results, using charts or graphs, and tables or diagrams appropriate to audience. Presenting and explaining methods and findings and justifying how they meet the purpose of the task and are appropriate to the audience.
Interpreting and presenting the results of calculations to solve problems relating to engineering or electrical systems and justify the methods used.
N3.2.2
N3.3 N3.3.1
N3.3.2
Suggested context
Collaborate with others to solve a practical engineering problem using principles and application of engineering science.
Work co-operatively with the team to solve the engineering problem, seeking advice when needed.
WO3.2
WO3.3
Suggested context
Using information from others, set own targets to learn about the principles and application of a specified aspect of engineering science.
Reference LP3.1
LP3.1.1
LP3.1.2 LP3.1.3
LP3.2
LP3.2.1
LP3.2.2
LP3.2.3
LP3.3
LP3.3.1
LP3.3.2 LP3.3.3
PS3.1.2
PS3.1.3
PS3.2 PS3.2.1
PS3.2.2
PS3.2.3
PS3.3
PS3.3.1
PS3.3.2
PS3.3.3
Work experience In order to emphasise the practical application of science in an engineering context it can be extremely advantageous to use a programme of relevant practical investigations to reinforce the underlying scientific principles. This will require access to an appropriately equipped engineering science laboratory or to individual laboratories specifically equipped for the teaching of mechanical and electrical science. For the delivery of learning outcomes 1 and 2 the equipment (normally found in a science or mechanics laboratory) can be used. This includes apparatus such as simple force boards, spring/mass systems, tensile test machines such as the Hounsfield tensometer, Fletchers trolley, friction equipment, and apparatus needed to determine momentum of bodies and circular motion parameters. Learners will also require access to mechanical measuring and test equipment, such as balances, stop clocks, etc. For the electrical outcomes (3 and 4), learner access to equipment such as simple circuit boards, electrostatic and magnetic equipment and basic electrical would assist learning. Learners will also require access to electrical measuring and test equipment, such as power supplies, multimeters and oscilloscopes. Learners will also require access to relevant scientific data and internet resources. Access to a PC with spreadsheet and graph/chart plotting software would also be advantageous for analysing and presenting data. Reference material Bird J Science for Engineering (Newnes, 2003) ISBN 0750657774 Bolton W Engineering Science, Fourth Edition (Newnes, 2001) ISBN 0750652594 Darbyshire A and Bolton W Mechanical Engineering: BTEC National option units, First Edition (Newnes, 2004) ISBN 0750657618 Tooley M and Dingle L BTEC National Engineering, Second Edition (Newnes, 2007) ISBN 0750685212
FURTHER INFORMATION
For further information please refer to the website: www.wjec.co.uk and www.edexcel.com
10
WJEC/Edexcel supports its customers with training related to our Principal Learning. This support is available through a choice of training options offered in Edexcels published training directory or through customised training at your centre/consortia/network. The support we offer focuses on a range of issues including: planning for the delivery of a new programme planning for assessment and grading developing effective assignments building your team and teamwork skills developing student-centred learning and teaching approaches building key skills into your programme building in effective and efficient quality assurance systems.
The national programme of training we offer can be viewed on our website (www.edexcel.org.uk/sfc/training). You can request customised training through the website or by contacting: Welsh Baccalaureate Qualification Team on tel. no. 029 2026 5320. WJEC/Edexcel Administration Team on tel. no. 029 2026 5078 Edexcel Cardiff Office on tel. no. 029 2079 4865 The training we provide: is active ideas are developed and applied is designed to be supportive and thought provoking builds on best practice.
11
LIST OF ANNEXES
This qualification title will appear on learners certificates. Learners need to be made aware of this when they are recruited by the centre and registered with WJEC/Edexcel. Providing this happens, centres are able to describe the programme of study leading to the award of the qualification in different ways to suit the medium and the target audience. Other codes The codes below will be required when making entries for individual units and the overall Principal Learning qualification: Unit codes Each unit is assigned a unit code. This unit code is used as an entry code to indicate that a learner wishes to take the assessment for that unit. Centres will need to use the entry codes only when entering learners for their examination or coursework moderation. The cash-in code is used as an entry code to aggregate the learners unit scores to obtain the overall grade for the qualification. Centres will need to use the cash-in codes only when entering learners for their qualification award. Please refer to the WJEC/Edexcel Information Manual, available on the WJEC website.
Cash-in codes
Please refer to the WJEC/Edexcel Information Manual, available on the WJEC website.
Assessment criteria
Experiential learning
Level
Line of learning
Principal Learning
Annexe C:
Internal Assessment of Principal Learning Units: Controls for Task Setting and Task Taking
Section 1: Introduction It is a requirement of the Criteria for accreditation of Principal Learning at Levels 1, 2 and 3 that: Internal assessment [of Principal Learning] must normally be supervised and conducted under controlled conditions to ensure reliability and fairness. Requirements must be set out to ensure robustness at each stage of internal assessment, including: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) the setting of tasks the extent of supervision in carrying out tasks the conditions under which assessment takes place marking and standardising procedures moderation and verification processes.
This annexe provides guidance for tutors and assessors in regard to the variety and levels of controls required for the setting and carrying out of tasks and assignments, and the conditions under which assessment takes place. It details the broad controls that apply to all assessments of a particular type, but learners must also meet any specific controls or additional requirements that may be identified within the Assessment guidance section in individual units. The controls required for task marking, standardisation and moderation are published separately as part of the accompanying tutor support materials. Types of evidence The types of assessment evidence which are called for within the Principal Learning units are: written evidence, such as reports, essays, minutes artefacts, such as artwork, manufactured products and other non-written physical evidence performance evidence, such as presentations, interviews and demonstrations of workshop skills.
3 1 2 1 1 if possible
3 2
1 if possible
Learner Activity
1 2 1 if possible 1
For any activity at least 1 form of evidence should be supplied. 1: Required 2: Preferred in addition to any required evidence 3: May be used if 2 is not appropriate or as additional evidence * with evidence of permission Where a form of evidence is mandatory it is marked as 1. Other evidence may be supplied in addition to any mandatory evidence using the preferred evidence where possible The requirements for written evidence are stated in the individual unit specification
Further guidance on authentication can be found within Section 3 of this Annexe. For all types of evidence the task setting requirements must be followed, which can be found in Section 2 of this Annexe. For each type of evidence the specific task taking requirements must be followed, which can be found in Section 3 of this Annexe. The controls required for task marking, standardisation and moderation are published separately as part of the accompanying tutor support materials.
Section 2: Task setting Assessment specification Each internally assessed unit is assessed through a single assignment which addresses the overall theme of the unit to emphasise how the different learning outcomes all relate to each other. Each assignment may be broken down into a series of related tasks. Use of awarding body materials WJEC/Edexcel will publish, as part of its tutor support materials, at least one assignment for each internally assessed unit. It is recommended that these assignments are used in the assessment of each unit. In order that these assignments can best meet learner interests and local needs they will include guidance for tutors and assessors to show the ways in which they may be adapted and contextualised. Writing assignments For those tutors or assessors wishing to design their own assignments, further guidance is provided in this specification, in the section Assessment and grading of the principal learning specifications. Centres role and responsibilities in setting tasks While it is not a requirement to use the WJEC/Edexcel assignments, they will ensure that learners have the opportunity to fully meet the requirements of each assessment criterion. If tutors or assessors wish to design their own assignments it is important that these assignments, or tasks within them, also offer learners the opportunity to fully meet all these requirements. There is a particular risk that this might not happen if assignments originally designed for other units are used. In some units the marking grid is divided into parts A and B. Tutors or assessors writing their own assignments must ensure that all tasks which will be marked against the A grid generate learner evidence that can be re-marked at a later stage during internal standardisation activity or external moderation. If a centre-devised assignment is to be used, it is a requirement that another person, who understands the requirements of the specification, checks each new assignment for validity and feeds back to the author. This is especially important when a new tutor/assessor is required to produce assignments. Appropriate people would include a Domain or Lead Assessor. This review process should be documented and the evidence of the review should be made available for the external moderator if requested. If the assignment is to be produced outside the teaching institution, for example by a supervisor at the learners work experience placement, then the tutor or assessor at the teaching institution responsible for that unit, must sign off the assignment for validity before the learner attempts the assignment.
Complexity If the level of complexity of the evidence required is not already identified within the specification, then an indication can be assumed from the amount of time set within the specification for the production of the assessment evidence, considering the level at which the specification is being taken. The expectations of what a Level 1 learner can accomplish in 10 hours are far different from that which can be expected from a Level 3 learner in the same time period. Unless it is otherwise specified, learners should be set a task of equivalent complexity, whether they are expected to achieve marks at mark band 1 of the marking grid or mark band 3. Group work When producing assignments which require learners to work in groups, tasks must be written to allow each group member to fully meet the requirements of the assessment criteria. Learners must not have their assessment opportunities reduced by the poor performance of other group members. Where this becomes apparent the tutor or assessor should intervene, or provide suitable alternative activities which do not greatly add to the learners workloads. Group tasks should not rely on the performance of individual members of the group to allow other group members to meet all of the assessment criteria. It is important that each learner is assessed on their individual contribution to the achievements of the group.
Section 3: Task taking In addition to any specific requirements about support which are identified within each unit within the specifications, the following guidelines should apply. Conditions If not specified within the unit, it is to be assumed that tasks or the whole assignment will normally be attempted at the end of the learning process. Within each unit the following are identified: the typical time required for assessment the access allowed to resources the level of supervision. Once an assignment has been completed and accepted by the assessor for marking the learner cannot make any further additions or amendments to the work. Where a future task or assignment builds on the work undertaken in an earlier task or assignment, the first task or assignment can be returned to the learner at the point it is needed. Where possible, it should be marked before it is returned and must be collected back in again when it is no longer needed for the second assignment, and stored in a secure place. Guidance to learners Where learners are required to gather information and resources, tutors or assessors should take the opportunity to discuss authentication and plagiarism at the outset. At the start of the assignment learners will often be required to plan out their programme of work. The tutor/assessors should agree these plans and where appropriate agree milestones where they can monitor learners responses. Appropriate intervention is to be encouraged to ensure learners have every opportunity of success. However, if the planning process forms part of the assessment criteria, care must be taken to ensure that the plan remains the learners own work. Role of the tutor It is expected that all learners should develop as independent learners, but this does not mean that they should not be given any support in order to be able to research, write up and complete their reports. The hallmark of the independent learner, whatever the level, is knowing when and whom to ask for support in helping to carry the work forward. All learners must be fully and equally briefed at the start of any task or assignment about the requirements of that task, including how they will be marked. They should be given the opportunity to ask any questions in order to clarify the requirements. Once the assignment is under way, the tutor should respond to questions and requests for advice, but should normally refrain from intervening unasked. Responses can advise the learner on such matters as further sources of information, and can point out where further work is needed, but must always stop short of actually stating what to write. For example, it is permissible to tell the learner that for further marks they need to analyse, not just present, their findings. It is permissible to remind them what analyse means. However, it is not permissible to talk them through their findings and prompt them to look at particular significant points.
In some units the amount of support and guidance a learner may receive in the course of carrying out the task or assignment is specified. This occurs, for example, when differentiation between mark bands is achieved in part by the support the learner needs to complete a practical task safely. Tutors or assessors must always intervene where matters of health and safety are concerned. When this happens, the assessor should make a judgement about the appropriate marks that can be applied to the learners work in the light of the intervention, and attach to the work a record of the intervention and justification for the marks awarded. Authentication All candidates must confirm that any work they submit for assessment is their own. Once the assignment has been completed the assessor may need to interview or test the learner on their understanding of the information and/or the resources that they have identified and used. This may be necessary if, for example: the assessor needs to confirm the authenticity of the work the unit marking grid carries marks for information and/or resource gathering. It will be up to the centre assessor to decide on the appropriate format, although the activity should be of a closed book nature. If the assessor decides to interview the learner, the assessor is required to question the learner regarding their information or resources until the assessor is sufficiently satisfied with the authentication. Whilst the interview is in progress the learner should not have access to the information or resources unless the individual unit specifies otherwise. It can be either a group or individual interview. If the assessor decides to test the learner, the assessor is required to follow the usual testing format, with learners working in silence, and placed in a manner so that they do not see other learners responses. The questions are at the discretion of the assessor, as is the length and timing of the test. Learners are not permitted to view the questions prior to the test and should not have access to their work during the test unless the individual unit specifies otherwise. The documented outcome could be either notes following an interview with one or a group of learners and signed by the assessor, or marked test papers. Each candidate is required to sign a declaration before submitting their coursework to their subject tutors/assessors for final assessment, to confirm that the work is their own and that any assistance given and/or sources used have been acknowledged. Ensuring that they do so is the responsibility of the candidates centre. It is also a requirement that tutors/assessors confirm to the awarding body that all of the work submitted for assessment was completed under the required conditions and that they are satisfied that the work is solely that of the individual candidate concerned. If they are unable to do so, the work should not be accepted for assessment. Centres should record marks of zero if candidates cannot confirm the authenticity of work submitted for assessment. All tutors/assessors who have assessed the work of any candidate entered for each component must sign the declaration of authentication. More guidance may be found in the JCQ Internal Conduct of Examinations (ICE) booklet for coursework and portfolios
Re-sits There may be occasions when a learner needs to retake a task or assignment. This is acceptable at the discretion of the tutor, but the assignment should normally be set in a different context so that the learner is not repeating exactly the same tasks which they have had the chance to practise beforehand. Individual units will have further guidance where appropriate. Artefact additional guidance Due to the nature of producing an artefact, its production will often be dictated by the availability of materials, equipment etc, therefore it may well be produced outside of the centre. However, the assessor must be confident that the work is that of the learner. In order to be confident, Edexcel requires one of the following situations to apply: The work is carried out under the direct supervision of the teaching centre assessor. This is the most desirable option The learner demonstrates to the teaching centre assessor equivalent levels of skill in each of the processes included in the final artefact. Ideally this would be in the course of the regular teaching/learning programme, but exceptionally, if the assessor feels a skill has been assessed at a level beyond expectations, the assessor may require the learner to repeat that skill before authenticating the work If the artefact can be produced remotely only, for example during work experience, the assessor must have enough reliable information to allow them to both accurately assess the outcome and have a signed witness statement from an appropriate person who directly observed the learner producing the artefact. It is not permissible for artefacts to be produced in the learners home environment without the direct supervision of their assessor. Performance evidence, including presentations and workshop skills additional guidance If a learner is being assessed on a presentation or a performance it is likely that some written evidence will also be available to assess, whether in hard copy or electronic format. This may be in the form of production notes, PowerPoint presentation, work logs etc. This section covers only the performance or presentation delivery skills. Likewise, in many cases a learner being assessed on workshop skills may also submit an artefact that has been produced or worked on that could form part of the evidence. Formative assessment is to be particularly encouraged to help learners prepare for their tasks. As with other forms of assessment, direct help during the assessed performance is not permitted unless explicitly stated as being acceptable in the guidance section for the relevant unit. Assessment must be based only on the performance put forward for assessment. This should be recorded using the most suitable format, which is at the centres discretion unless stipulated in the relevant unit. Where witness statements and practical activity logs are required WJEC/Edexcel will provide exemplar pro formas. Centres may choose to develop their own documentation, but they must record at least the information contained within the exemplar pro formas. Other evidence that will support assessment decisions includes audio and visual recordings and photographs, particularly if they have been annotated.
Pathways Level 3 Principal Learning in Engineering/LG 24/8/10