Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Approach 1
Research Approach 1
Research Design
Since we had used secondary research for the purpose of ascertaining the
leadership skills in various industries, a different approach was required. Though
it is undoubtedly true that “situational leadership” is the best leadership style, the
key would be the behaviour that is driving the same. The better half of ‘Corporate
Leadership’ is ‘Corporate Citizenship’. There has been hardly any work on the
strategy and approach required to deal effectively with subordinates. Hence we
started by classifying the target sample as effective/successful leaders and
derailed leaders. But leadership is not complete without the “team”. Taking a cue
from every team member who is responsible for his part of the work while he is
still answerable to the leader; in leadership too, getting appropriately the right
work done from the right people at the right time is extremely important. It
becomes absolutely necessary to know that the key to success in leadership
is success in getting the right work from the team. Team members or
subordinates can be classified as under:
1. Autocratic:
2. Benevolent
3. Chaotic
4. Democratic
Since the outcome of the study was not known at the beginning, Exploratory
research would not be sufficient to provide solutions. At the most it would hint us
on methods to be followed. On the other hand, causal research would be
ineffective as the objective has never been to ascertain the cause and effect
relationship but to ascertain the right strategy by investigating successful people.
Although there were options to do causal and exploratory research the most
appropriate method had to be selected. Finally the most appropriate technique
that selected was Descriptive Research. Descriptive research is a type of
conclusive research that has its major objective the description of something-
usually market character or functions.
DISADVT EXP:
Why – Or the purpose of the data collection is not disclosed to prevent them from
putting personal opinions
Design
The questionnaire has a longitudinal design such that asks the same questions
at two or more points in time. This is done in order to ascertain that the spirit of
the questions is upheld in the review at self assessment. Cohort study is aimed
at how historical periods change over time.
Errors on account of non response have been eliminated as the pursuance was
strong. Efforts have also been made to control those errors that can be avoided
viz; measurement and user bias. Random sampling error has been minimized by
focusing and planning the sample .
Administration:
Personal Interviews of the people with prior well co ordianted appointments made
the study efficient. Non biasdness was ensured by not allowing the interviewees
aout the aimof the research. A good deal of transparency and understanding
prevailed at the time of the respective interviews.
Insuring Anonymity :
Data was collected in such a way that the identity of the subject is protected.
This means that no names, telephone numbers, permanent account numbers, or
addresses should appear on survey sheets or in the research report. Interview
subjects were given fictitious names.
Social scientists believe that a great deal of potential harm can be avoided by
obtaining informed consent of research subjects prior to the research. In
essence, we believe informed consent was practiced as the following were
ensured:
Subjects are made aware that they are part of a research project,
Subjects are told what the purpose of the research is,
Subjects are forewarned about what their participation will involve,
Subjects are not forced in any way to participate, and
Subjects are given the opportunity to withdraw their participation at any
time.
The content of the interview was not sensitive (i.e., would not put the
respondent at risk of financial, legal, reputational, or emotional harm, as
discussed above).
Research practices that violate the principle of informed consent include those
that involve deception and/or coercion. The two are related in the sense that if a
we do not tell people that they are being studied (deception), we are therefore
forcing the people to participate (coercion). Coercion can occur by itself when
people are made aware that they are the subjects of research but not given the
option of non-participation. These are currently very controversial in the social
science community and researchers who engage in such practices are expected
to justify them by demonstrating that their research has great social benefits.
Additionally, these kinds of proposed research projects often face opposition
when presented to institutional committees that approve and/or sponsor
research. Stress was given on quality and hence even though the sample size
was low on representation, quality of delivery and administration made all the
difference.
Also the Human Resources Dept. of the respective companies had played a
critical role in taking this message clearly to the target subjects.
Scaling Techniques:
After establishing the psychometric properties of the questions and a testing was
done in controlled environment, the questions were finalized. It must be
reiterated that the exercise was a measurement of attitudes and hence
quantitative operations would be difficult. In order to qualify the data for
mathematical operations, it was impending to use a scale that shall help this.
The summated Rating or Likert Scale was used as this scale allows quantitative
analysis.
1. Commercial Banking
2. Insurance
3. Brokerage House
4. Management Consultancy
5. ITES
6. Hospitality
7. Media
Developing the above points with the help of figures was made easy by
approaching the Indian Merchant Chamber and NASSCOM that provided us with
the list of people engaged in these occupations. The population data obtained
was as under:
With 99% confidence levels and post deduction of margin of error, the sample
size of the population was frozen to 80 people. This was stratified by
having multiple companies in each sector and people at different roles of
leadership.
As the research went through various stages as in the flow diagram, a final
questionnaire was frozen keeping all objectives in mind. Since executives
have limited time to spare, the time factor was of utmost importance. This
became particularly important since most of the interviews were at the
premises of the Organisation, they were willing to allocate a limited time
and limited personnel only. Hence the questionnaire as well as the entire
interview process ought to be very well planned and administered. it was
also decided that the flow and evaluation scheme would conceal the
process of extraction of information. It must be reiterated that the subjects
in all cases ought to be clearly informed on the objective, time taken etc;
Previous studies include “Vroom Yetton Jago model(1973)”, “Ohio and Michigan
studies”, Fiedler’s Contingency Theory Hershey Blanchard’s life cycle theory of
leadership and the Path Goal Theory.
Development of Questions: