2006(3) 0h (6)ainad Fe ih pshl ci aly Age CALAN gpl) Gl 8 Gi gb atc Stat cc ast celal Gable BL Gal A Naty Realy — 5 phall Glatl Als vali! a Saall DIS Sag yaly Saeco Mad gh jai Una gh Sanibel Cyt yl LAY Snes 946 lad os SpE Jal fd yeh aay tl iQ Sa aby cL AU 8g pal ela Gage + 1998 o3!)1994 le SM AL al Ai j52001 SAS So Gala! Cae ( General Linear Model ) plell pill cipal 4b clei) SE peal) s tal meagan yay a meas lal C1 gine BOY Ly ae) SG) Jalal Gans Ss (MIVQUE ) c Als) © 0.09 5 0.10 ( MIVQUE ) 44:84 24 FAB gM 5 Nagi BLS, GIG O14 50.15 ( TYPE 1 ) Sy deal ds BU) ct yt Jay gal Jal all ght Liga yaks 9S US Rg al Lil gd ( GAGY1 SY gh «laa etal 2S CTYPE 1) 9 Bll SIGN a Hl psa) ysis Ay 1) Lee Ab 9 Ga ale yah gan) es Gala GO = 1 Aba aly 5 yb Lab Lag 301 Ada yall AS Al He | 50.16 5 47.92 EL Lay SSF lel tng gale ll A yl pin tay INN pl yall Sse Jada JOS Grohn ) cA jt uae Ll ge + 1999-5 5, Durr « 1998 2% +5 Roxstrom + 2000 +32}, Beaudeau a oN Lal jal aba BLS 5 an LS (2001 GENS fi lla gh agay Gilly Wall ys Gi 39 ( 0.05 > 1) Layne AS Jy! peg gf Gua Ke papal Lisl Laat sLaall sth i gl SN ae pall pi abe CLS es glee lb LY LEN 5 sie ad Al Lely 235 3000 - 2001. 55.10» 48.95 Lb3) «38 6000-5001 AN ce PBA, Mya gle yt qa oka (Hsu ye) Ail Getoy! tly Hath gus! (1998 Solkner 5 Ducroeg ) m AM SYM Se pall depen BSS Ay = 2 egy bil yet 26 =1 ge (7- + 30-29=3 Gils 1 4237 = 7636-35 =66 34- "e034 Ol U9 ny ily Uns ey. sine op gley douglas "iin “Ynnbe “Lu ji Bled we iy AL LS yt eh yctl Jac Spt Lat By ota a Ga al Rao) MIVQUE ai sb Jul Sib gt Hall WN Lusadh (1) Uys oe + lel gy Let S101 ab Linh yt Gay a pb Cd Ag SL) Ga cyst) ga 3 Hoque ) a= 48 - 28 oe sasha «1992 Lawlor 5 Short « 1980 Hodges *Pljy Chirinos + 1995 »ejy Weigel (2002 CA Gab ga Tall Lage pty Lan Aaya Rial BUN Ite Ael aN gi ABN cli gM seed Cts Shaul 38, ASS al a ah ULE a ll se 2B a ok a gle Ses Lay Wi pn a AES Yo yaks aS we LL aay all pallet) SUM ye Sag, w +S geal sat YING. Ge gy aaa eg ty AREY gly Ge GLY ad Ly aay Te A O85 ONS ype post uly2006(3)ssai (6)alnah Fue\ 430 pg cS Gale Une cet ta CLI Gg he Bly jy ala sty pl SUAS SF EL pa sae Sy IMT ae al (eet 25) yy sll value ) oy a) ed) (BLUP ) (Genetic merits ) 453 syiaal! DAS sN od el otal dig dal Rb yay AS ita AL gal pe ye Sa LS ofS GT GLEN YIN 3 4B Ay aes all MI Spey ASI al + B2y 5. (1985 25455 Bath ) Aina att 3' ( Breeding (BLUP ) Qa 5 lath yo (4) dye V2 4,79 eV Was yi ch gi 24 Seat Spey ol gull yd. 20~ I BS ob 9 Te ysl aly ga SST gyi aed ANC Aan sesh te Lay 55 ays, (3) Bourdon ee ol ote tials tall pias Vukasinovic sis «319 pile csaLissl Hikal hg pal ise ob ( 1997) YDS A bt By Ta JS tse Tle Me ( Reliability )igiilnioe 3p yy all Leal gee SLT DL Hs LEW (Liye pat ) Aiba y ct aa, Be Ay) Say Sad gf AN CS ysl SE SN te Si ye a Uy GSS citi poet el pat Gk a Ally lps 23 yall ais a 95) GAB pha ae il a 8 wal Sy OW Lage Sia als aga 5 5 SL thay Sa ste oe jee Sl yg tl oe ee ot CL LAY Lt Ng al ge LE AIS Day Lg Jit Ayal Uacidl 5 Sages SS Del ay igs 85 OI (2) Ups Oe et 58S) GS Ja pag Gi gl te Jay $1964 4( 2005 05245 Sewalem + 2005 Hansen Van Vleck) quhill Ji etish fe My yb LN ole Gt Gh sl ee gia ELEY GV CaS) ly gg al CLL AgtGVI shall § Gatiss Agen (Sli JRY a jos VLAN +1997 dia} Vukasinovic ) pa!) 1 y's (2004 Wiggans y Kuhn gies AS AAV BAY gl aie pall ole oh yas Ay a Sh poi ais (QF 1) Le gay SUNY gil se jaall 53h je Lik gl 3 (2002 ) 9543; Chirinos @t +1 egHLSal Ay + (2005) 952454 Sewalem eH i Lote Lat ft Ka psy gil pal le 0.09 5 0.10 MIVOUT (3 dsr2) AGN 0.145 0.15 TYPE 1 sabe ole pu ee BUY, Lad ai pyls pay Reedy cL ll gl LE el ysl ga = 0.04 ca cin gs lly ab sats sal Ducroeq + 1980 Hodges » Hoque } 0.21 +1999 23% +35 Durr « 1998 Solkners 4 Van der Linde « 2002 5245s Chirinos (2004 »35455 Van Raden + 2002 De Jong 0.04 gay cea lf Lia Lt say «© 1992 Lawlor 5 Short) 0.19 sS—39 Durr 1995 93 45y Weigel (1997) Bourdan $3 lea 1 Ji ( 1999 Bape y Ligh le § al Jie Lt yl ti ob—_ SS ts 2006(3) 01 (6) pl Sel 0 aghll Guy dela Ug ee 95s pany OAS Say I chal ginny Laks Alay AM ais oat ob ke gS eee el Gg ctu I a, a olde Scie W aie all SM ap gd cial ct La Bay ( Sl, Fad poe cinall all) GBYI Gt IYI Shall (correlated! response ) Las 3+ Spa gly clam SEG Gay Gl Lah Glas PANS chee gly 285 Ugee Ua a cay) ty Pay My Keyl HS alga Aad) yuh se Md hall type Tiel lal pail Lal) Apa veyed Slane Aly ga dla IS OST Gein AIL oy LSU A gt ASH DS Os Gal Rall S155 ii yal ein2006(3) 223) (6) ata} Foch 5 asta cu Si data Ue GS Geach bag Sp Dag =| Aor as | Serer 4 i I 22) | a a ioe al3l 2353.10 I 194 ea Tra i a124 £52.48 | 24 = a 119 + 48.92 | 276 Sal I Sy 1 tee [ 48 1994 | 166 1995 Ca | 297 1996 oa { 333 1997, | 2 1998 = ; Sapte 236 Un 60-1 is. 140 120-61 | t lol 180-121 I 132 240-181 4 iz a 1.63 £36.94 | 103 300= 241 e b 1.23 + 47.92 | 214 Ley 301 oe SST | oi ieee be 140 52.49 | 155 G2 8 552000 € 1.36 48.95 | 136 3000 —2001 a 1.26 £52.96 [cease 4000 - 3001 C ab 18 an 3000 4001 = ab 1.60 } 6000 - 5001 a2los I 61 | US 6001 | | GAVE al tes al.92 £58.57 I 82 BET 226 cat alld = 37.95 203 28-27 a 123 456.23 281 30-29 i a 1.36 + 54.90 193 32-31 tll ___b201 49.17 7 ‘ b 2474 46.75 [ 45 - b2I8e HAS ! i ois soe Se Ue Lai pine GLSIY Iie JS ysl ay aye MBL ye ead yall oll gl2006(3) ss (6) ta} Aee\ 3) pgall cy Si deals Ug Bol Asati) Shea AG all al pall Gul tas 2 yan, albages talaga T | 3 5371.84 | 3 ey **47158.35 4 Dd a #7 8136.89 3 hl oS =| 2675.07 3 Sa sje ** 9982.74 zs 6 OY Mae yal 4 os é ee (0.01>1)** (0.05 >I)" is Lat) Blea 8h lt pHa ch ysis 3 yan CP) od is SaaS | Gia Gay aca FEE 0.09 0.10 MIVQUI O14 O15 TYPE1 References Bath D.K.F.W. Dickerson H.A, Tucker and R.D. Appleman.1985. Dairy Catile Principles , Practies, Problems , Profits .2" ed, Lea and Febiger , Philadelphia . Beaudeau F.,H . Secgers V. Ducrocq C.. Fourichon und N . Bareille . 2000 . Effect of health disorders on culling in dairy cows : a review and acritical discussion. dnn_Zootech 149: 293-311 Bourdon R.M. 1997, Understanding Animal Breeding . Prentice Hall , Upper Saddle River . NJ 07458, Chirinos Z.,M . J. Caratano and D. Hernandez, 2002 . Longevity analysis in Spanish Holstein — Friesian cattle. 7" World Congress on Genetic Applied! to Livestock Production August, 19-23, Montpellier, France Druet T., J. Solkner AF. Groen and N. Genyler, 1999. Improved genetic evaluation of survival ing MACE to combine direct and correlated information from yield and functional traits. Jaterbull Bulletin, 21 : 122-127, 312006(3) 221) (6)laa ACN) 3 p glall cu SS Analy Alana Ducrocq V. and J. Solkner. 1998. Implentation of a routine breeding value evaluation for longevity of dairy cows using survival analysis techniques . 6th World Congress on Genetic Applied to Livestock Production , 12-16 Jan.Armidale NSW Ausirulia © 27:3061-3070 Durr J.W.HLG. Monardes and RL Cue. 1999 . Genetic analysis of herd life av Ouehee Holsteins using weibull models. J. Dairy Sei, 82 : 2503-2513. Grohn_ Y.T.S.W. Eicker, V. Ducroeq and J. Hertl, 1998. Eflect of diseases on the culling of 81 : 966-978, Holstein dairy cows in New York state. J. Da Hansen L.B.2005.The pole of genetics in cow longevity . www-wsic.edidysci/ hansenpaper pdf Harvey W .R, 1991 . Mixed models least - square and maximum liklihood computer program.Users Guide for LSMLMW7The Ohio University Columbus , Ohio. Hoque M. and J. Hodges. 1980. Genetie and phenotypic parameters of lifetime production traits in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci, 63 : 1900-1910. Kuhn M.T, and G.R. Wiggans. 2004. Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow fertility . J. Dairy Sei., 87 : 2285-2292. Rao CR. 1971. Minimum variance quadratic unbiased estimation of variance component = of © Mulivoriate snalysis. 445-436. Roxstrom A. 2001, Genetic aspects of fertility and longevity in dairy cattle, (Thesis) ugp- ww w.dis-epsilon. shu se/archive, SAS. 2001 . SAS / STAT Users Guide for Personal Computer . Release 6.18. SAS Institute . Inc., .C., USA. Sewalem A.,G.J.,Kistemaker,¥. Ducrocq and B.J. Van Doormaal.2005.Genetic analysis of Cary herd life in Canadian dairy cattle on a lactation basis using weibull proportions hazards model. Dairy Sci,,88:804-811 Short T.H. and T.J. Lawlor. 1992. Genetic parameters of conformation traits , milk yield , and herd life in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sei.. 75 : 1987-1998, Van der inde C. and G. De Jong, 2002, Feasibility of MACE for longevity traits . fnterbull Bulletin, 29 : $5-60.+ 2006(3)s3 (6)ste-u) Fuel 3) pghll Gu S daly Van Raden P.M. ,A.H. Sanders , M.E. Tooker ,R.H. Miller , H.D.Norman .M.T, Kuhn and G.R. Wiggans. 2004. Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow tenitity +A_Dairy Sei., 87: 2285-2292 Van Vieck L.D. 1964. First lactation performance and herd life Vukasinovie N. ,J. Moll and J Dairy Sei, 47: 1000-1003, Cunzi. 1997. Analysis of productive life in Swiss Brown Cattle - £2" Annual Meeting of European Association for Animal Production, 25 -29 fugust, Lillehammer Weigel D.J..B.G. Cassell , I-Hoeschele and RE, Pearson, 1995, Multiple-trait prediction of transmitting abilities for herd life and estimation of economic weights using relative net income adjusted for opportunity cost . J. Dairy Sci., 78 : 639-647. 332006(3) 243 (6) stoi Aoel 50 a slall cS dusty Une Genetic evaluation of functional productive life in Holstein cows F.R.Al-Samarai Veterinary Medicine College- Baghdad University Abstract A total of 946 culled Holstein cows whose born during the period from 1994 to 1998 lysed at the Nasr Dairy Cattle Station, United Company for Animal Resources Ltd., ALSouei a (50 Km South of Baghdad ). The aim of the study is to evaluated sires accordin,: to functional productive life before adjusted for fixed effects and to estimate heritability . General Linear Model ( GLM ) within the S- 1S program was used to study some fixed effects (season and year of calving , stage of lactation , level of first milk yield at first calving ), Va nee components for random effects were estimated by two methods MIVQUE and TYPE 1. ‘The overall mean of functional productive life 51.01 4 0.56 months. The effects of year and season of birth stage of lactation and age at first calving were highly significant (P <0.01) whereas level of production at first lactation was significant (P< 0.05) ‘The heritability of functional and true productive life were 0.10 , 0.09 respectively by MIVQUE whereas the corresponding heritability by TYPE 1 is 0.15 and 0.14 respectively . BLUP of 24 sires ranged from 4.79 to ~ 4.20 months respectively . 34