INTRODUCTION: The introduction provides a clear explanation of the purpose of the proposal and the

importance of the topic. Well-written.

PROBLEM STATEMENT: The problem statement clearly identifies the issue of accidents on junction roads
The problem statement is
and the issues with current traffic light controllers. Well-written.
clearly stated and identifies the main issue of accidents on junction roads. It
also mentions additional issues such as cost consumption, time consumption,
and unreliability of controllers. However, more specific details and statistics
could be provided to enhance the clarity and depth of the problem statement.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The research question is clear and directly addresses the problem statement.
The research question is relevant to the problem statement and
Well-written.
addresses the main concerns of minimizing accidents, controlling traffic lights,
and detecting the presence of vehicles and pedestrians. However, the
research question could be more specific and precise. For example, it could
include elements such as the effectiveness of different traffic control methods,
the role of technology in accident prevention, or potential solutions for
improving the efficiency of traffic control systems.

HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis articulates how the implementation of an intelligent and dynamic traffic
The
light controller can solve the problems identified in the problem statement. Well-written.
hypothesis is clearly stated and proposes the implementation of an intelligent
and dynamic traffic light controller to solve the problems existing in traffic
roads. It provides details on how the system will work, including the use of
continuous images and shape recognition of vehicles and pedestrians through
cameras, interpretation of the data using Python programming, and
generating appropriate delays for vehicles and pedestrians at junctions.

LITERATURE REVIEW: The literature review provides a summary of different methods used by other
scientists to address traffic road issues. However, there is no evaluation or critique of these methods.
The literature
More analysis and comparison of the different methods would improve this section.
review provides an overview of different methods that have been explored to
solve traffic road problems. It mentions the use of a dynamic traffic light
controller using machine vision and optimization algorithms, which optimizes
traffic flow based on information from cameras. This method has the potential
to be efficient but also mentions the high capital cost of implementing it.
Another method mentioned is traffic monitoring using multiple cameras and
multi-hypothesis tracking, which tracks objects around the junction but does
not effectively control traffic. This method is also mentioned to be expensive
and difficult to implement. The review also discusses a PLC based intelligent
traffic control system, which checks sensor conditions and provides output
signals to control the traffic lights based on priority. However, it is mentioned
that this method is not highly efficient and may lead to accidents and
frustration in certain conditions. Overall, the literature review provides a good
overview of existing methods but could benefit from additional details and
analysis of their effectiveness and limitations.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of designing a dynamic and intelligent traffic light controller is clearly stated.
The objective of the project is stated clearly, which is to design a
Well-written.
dynamic and intelligent traffic light controller that takes into account the priority
of vehicles and pedestrians. However, the objective could be more specific
and measurable. For example, it could include specific goals such as reducing
wait times at junctions, minimizing accidents, or optimizing traffic flow.

METHODOLOGY: The methodology section provides an overview of the materials to be used, but lacks
detail on how exactly the system will be designed and implemented. More specific information on the
The methodology section is lacking
process and steps involved would improve this section.
in detail and clarity. It mentions the use of a camera, Arduino controller,
general purpose computer, traffic light display, and seven segment display as
the materials for the project. However, there is no explanation of how these
components will be utilized to achieve the objective. Additionally, there is no
mention of the specific steps or procedures that will be followed in the project
implementation. It would be beneficial to provide more information on how the
camera will capture and interpret images, how the Arduino controller will
process the data and control the traffic lights, and how the general purpose
computer and displays will be integrated into the system. Additionally, an
explanation of the software or programming languages that will be used could
enhance the methodology section.

TIMELINE BREAKDOWN OF THE PROJECT: The timeline breakdown provides clear dates and tasks to be
completed. Well-written.
REFERENCES: The references section lists the sources used for the proposal, but there is no specific
citation format used. Consistency in citation style would improve this section.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction clearly states the problem of denial of service (DoS) attacks on web
services. However, it could provide more context on the prevalence and impact of these attacks. Overall,
well-written.

PROBLEM STATEMENT: The problem statement accurately identifies the impact of DoS attacks on web
services and the need for testing mechanisms to prevent and detect these attacks. Well-written. The
problem statement is written properly. It clearly identifies the impact and
consequences of DoS attacks on web services and highlights the need for
testing to ensure reliable and secure services. It also mentions the potential
cost expenses and productivity losses that can occur due to lack of testing.
Additionally, it addresses the motivation for proposing a system that can
identify vulnerabilities caused by DoS attacks.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The research questions clearly address the aim of testing vulnerabilities in web
The research questions are relevant to the
services caused by DoS attacks. Well-written.
problem statement and focus on testing vulnerabilities and detecting if the
attacker is spoofing packets. However, the research questions could be more
specific and precise. It would be helpful to provide more details on the testing
methods and techniques that will be used to achieve the objectives of the
research.

HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis presents the approach of using multiple toolsets to test and identify DoS
attacks on web services. However, more information on the specific methods and techniques to be used
would improve this section.
The hypothesis is not clearly stated in the provided text. It seems to suggest
that the vulnerabilities on the web service can be tested and identified by
multiple tool sets that manipulate packets for network scanning and
penetration testing. However, it would be beneficial to explicitly state the
hypothesis in a clear and concise manner.
LITERATURE REVIEW: The literature review provides some examples of existing mechanisms against DoS
attacks, but lacks analysis and evaluation of these mechanisms. More critical assessment of the
weaknesses and strengths of previous approaches would improve this section.

OBJECTIVE: The objective clearly states the intention to test and identify DoS attacks on web services.
The objective is stated relatively clearly. The proposal aims to test
Well-written.
the impact of DoS attacks on web services and internet users, with the goal of
preparing and implementing preventative mechanisms. However, the
objective could be improved by providing more specific details about the
desired outcomes or metrics for success. What specific vulnerabilities will be
identified? What specific preventative mechanisms will be developed?

METHODOLOGY: The methodology section provides an overview of the tools and tasks involved in
implementing the proposed system. However, more specific information on how these tools will be used
The
and what steps will be taken to test and identify DoS attacks would improve this section.
methodology is briefly explained, but it could benefit from further elaboration.
The proposal mentions setting up a work environment using Virtual Box
software and installing various tools for manipulating packets. However, it
lacks information on how these tools will be used to test and identify DoS
attacks on the network. Additionally, it would be helpful to describe the
specific steps or procedures that will be followed during the testing process.
Overall, the components of the proposal are written in a general and slightly
vague manner. They could be improved by providing more specific details,
measurable objectives, and a clear step-by-step methodology.

PROJECT TIMELINE: The timeline breakdown provides clear dates and tasks to be completed. Well-
written.
REFERENCES: The references section includes the sources used for the proposal, but lacks consistent
citation formatting. Proper citation formatting would improve this section

INTRODUCTION: The introduction provides a clear explanation of the purpose of the proposal and the
importance of the topic. The focus on web-based systems in healthcare is well-justified. Well-written.

PROBLEM STATEMENT: The problem statement highlights the inefficiencies of the traditional
appointment system and the need for an online system to enable patients and healthcare providers to
interact more easily and efficiently. Well-written.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The research questions are clear and directly address the problem statement.
Well-written.

HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis presents the approach of developing an online patient appointment
system to replace the paper-based system. However, more information on the specific methods and
techniques involved would improve this section.

LITERATURE REVIEW: The literature review provides relevant examples and studies on similar systems
and approaches. The evaluation and critique of these systems add value to this section. Well-written.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of developing an online patient appointment system is clearly stated and
justified. Well-written.

METHODOLOGY: The methodology section outlines the tasks and tools involved in developing the
proposed system. More specific information on the steps and processes would improve this section.

PROJECT PLAN: The timeline breakdown provides clear dates and tasks to be completed. Well-written.

REFERENCES: The references section lists the sources used for the proposal. Proper citation formatting is
used. Well-written.
INTRODUCTION: The introduction clearly states the purpose of the project and the problem with
traditional lock and key based door lock systems. The rationale for using RFID technology in door locks is
justified. Well-written.

PROBLEM STATEMENT: The problem statement provides a clear description of the issues with traditional
door lock systems and how duplicating keys can create insecurity. Well-written.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The research question is focused on improving door lock systems using RFID
technology and password authentication. Well-written.

HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis presents the approach of using RFID technology and password
authentication to improve the security and accessibility of traditional door lock systems. It also mentions
the system's customization feature. Well-written.

LITERATURE REVIEW: The literature review provides relevant examples and studies on similar systems
and approaches. However, more critical analysis and evaluation of these systems would improve this
section.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of improving traditional door lock systems using RFID technology and
customization feature is clearly stated and justified. Well-written.

METHODOLOGY: The methodology section outlines the tasks and tools involved in developing the
proposed system. However, more specific information on the steps and processes would improve this
section.

PROJECT PLAN: The timeline breakdown provides clear dates and tasks to be completed. Well-written.
REFERENCES: The references section lists the sources used for the proposal. Proper citation formatting is
used. Well-written.