Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Neurodivergence Final Draft
Neurodivergence Final Draft
Zoe Raschke
Maurya Brand
English 101
April 6, 2023
Have you ever asked yourself the question, “am I normal?” Chances are, you probably
have. We are living in one of the most rapidly advancing time periods in human history, and
among those advances is the concept of neurodiversity. The topic has rapidly gained the attention
of our society, and although some aspects are not currently agreed upon, there’s no arguing that
increasing awareness is shaping the lives of individuals and institutions today. So, if you’ve ever
silently wondered whether or not you were “normal”, let’s take a look at why you’re probably
not alone.
What is neurodiversity anyways? Well, an exact definition is not entirely agreed upon
due to the complex nature of what it covers. According to Harvard Medical School, the
neurodiversity stance refers to “the idea that people experience and interact with the world
around them in many different ways; there is no one "right" way of thinking, learning, and
behaving, and differences are not viewed as deficits” (What is Neurodiversity, Harvard Medical
School). Scientifically, this boils down to the fact that no two brains are identical. Neurodiversity
awareness aims to bring our attention to this fact, and potentially the ways that we can be more
accommodating of the differences naturally present in our cognitive make-up. There is another
view, however, that feels as though a “one size fits all” term downplays the struggles of
individuals with cognitive impairment that is more debilitating. Take this quote from a Big Think
illiteracy, an inability to communicate, problems with fine motor skills, an inability to pay attention,
and so on. To imply that these conditions are entirely benign ignores the very real, and sometimes
severe, consequences these individuals live with” (More Harm Than Good?, Big Think).
So, it begs the question, who is neurodivergent? For quite some time, western medicine
has focused its efforts on diagnosing and treating any symptoms they find that stray from what is
most common, or “typical”. This is based around an ideal that developmental differences, such
as autism, are disabilities that need to be treated, but according to the Cleveland Clinic,
“neurodivergent people struggle because of systems or processes that don’t give them a chance
to show off their strengths or that create new or more intense challenges for them”
(Neurodivergent, Cleveland Clinic). This new perspective led to the coining of the term
This, in combination with the autistic self-advocacy movement in the 1990’s, paved the
way for a new perspective of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) along with other developmental
differences. Neurodivergence has grown into a movement that encompasses most of these
differences, such as ADHD, Down Syndrome, sensory processing disorders, and learning
disorders like dyslexia. Of course, there are many more things that this refers to, but “Some
people oppose the idea of neurodiversity as being about differences instead of deficits. Many
who take that stance say they’re against it because some who are neurodivergent have true
medical conditions that need treatment” (Neurodivergent, Cleveland Clinic). Some research,
however, does not support this stance, and instead says being aware of neurodiversity allows
individuals to achieve more through a better understanding of themselves. Still though, perhaps
one of the most divided communities on the subject is the autistic community. Some people feel
that the neurodiversity stance only pertains to individuals with high functioning autism.
Raschke 3
According to one article posted on Scientific American, “Many of these are parents of autistic
children or autistic individuals who struggle substantially in any environment, who may have
almost no language, exhibit severe learning difficulties, suffer gastrointestinal pain or epilepsy,
appear to be in anguish for no apparent reason or lash out against themselves or others.”
It's not just people who identify as neurodivergent who are becoming more aware of this
new idea. Whatever your stance, many businesses and other institutions such as schools are
In particular, fields associated with math, art, and science. For example, one article titled
“Neurodiversity in the Lab” aims to educate readers about the many ways they can foster a more
suitable working environment through clear communication, updates in hiring and meeting
practices, and starting a conversation about neurodiversity in the workplace. People appear to be
changing the way that they think about neurodiversity, and even encouraging a more diverse
So, how has all of this affected the lives of the neurodivergent? According to OCED
Forum Network, “around 15% of the world population is believed to be neurodivergent but
perceptions of them are still coloured by information mainly attained from an outside
perspective, so they keep facing invisible hurdles from expectations derived from a typical
standard” (Shifting Mindsets, OECD). The same article states that the employment gap for
autistic people remains substantial, with only 22% holding a paying job. Despite this, a quick
internet search shows that awareness does appear to be spreading, and more big names seem to
be making accommodations and educating others on how to do the same. One article from
Harvard Business Review states “A growing number of prominent companies have reformed
their HR processes in order to access neurodiverse talent; among them are SAP, Hewlett Packard
Raschke 4
Enterprise (HPE), Microsoft, Willis Towers Watson, Ford, and EY. Many others, including
Caterpillar, Dell Technologies, Deloitte, IBM, JPMorgan Chase, and UBS, have start-up or
exploratory efforts under way” (Competitive Advantage, Harvard Business Review). This would
suggest that it’s becoming easier for individuals with less severe neurodiversities to obtain jobs
or be accepted into schools through alternative methods of interviewing and applying. Based on
In conclusion, if you’ve ever asked the question, “am I normal”, the answer is a little up
to interpretation. Perhaps a better question would be, does such a thing exist? If you’re basing
your answer on the fact that every brain is different, then technically no. If you’re operating
based off the traditional medical model, it may be more black and white. With so much variance
in the ways humans experience the world, it’s easy to see why this has become a hot topic in a
relatively short amount of time. It will be interesting to see where this increased awareness of our
cognitive differences will take us as a society; so, I leave you with the question, what do you
Works Cited
Nicole Baumer, MD, and MD Julia Frueh. “What Is Neurodiversity?” Harvard Health, 23 Nov.
2021, https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/what-is-neurodiversity-
Fink, Jennifer L.W. “Neurodiversity in the Lab.” Neurodiversity in the Lab, The Physiologist
Magazine, https://www.physiology.org/publications/news/the-physiologist-
“Neurodivergent: What It Is, Symptoms & Types.” Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, 2 June
Mar. 2023.
All.” The OECD Forum Network, | Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and
Thomson, Johnny. “Does the Term ‘Neurodiversity’ Do More Harm than Good?” Big Think, 19
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-neurodiversity-is-
Reflection
I think the biggest thing I learned from writing this essay was how I can work on being
truly neutral with my writing if need be. In my first draft, I genuinely believed I hadn’t shown
any true preference. After some guidance, however, I realized I had almost no evidence of an
opposing view. In my initial research, I was attempting to only put in searches that seemed
neutral. I read probably 10 articles this way, and after so many I assumed what I was reading was
the only view. It was really helpful to receive feedback on how I could try to search for more
opinionated things instead. The second attempt immediately gave more polarized results. I think
this experience with research will be extremely helpful if I ever have to do something like this in
the future.
For these reasons, the majority of my highlighted text is an attempt to showcase the
opposing view of my initial research. In the very first paragraph, I changed one of the words to
“concept.” I believe this word alone started off the paper in a more neutral tone by depicting
neurodiversity as something conceptual for some rather than concrete for all. I continued to go
back through the paper and adjust my original wording to mirror this tone. The rest of the added
text is primarily my research of the opposing view. It was interesting coming at a controversial
topic in this manner. I started to see certain valid points in both arguments, and I feel better
informed for doing so. I enjoyed being surprised in this way, and I will definitely keep this in