Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project File
Project File
ON
Faculty Guide:
Muheet Nizami
Cover Page
Certificate
Acknowledgement
Table of Contents
List of Tables
1. Chapter 1 - Introduction to the Study 1-14
2.1 History
2.2 Vission and Mission of zomato
2.3 Zomato’s Business Model
2.4 Acquisitions
2.5 About the Founders
2.6 Alternatives & Competitors to Zomato
Chapter 3: Analysis & intrepretation of data 26-39
3.
5. Bibliography 43
6. Annexure 44-46
List of Tables
TABLE TITLE PAGE
NO. NO.
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY
1.1 Brief Overview of the study
Customer satisfaction is defined as a measurement that determines how
happy customers are with a company’s products, services, and capabilities.
Customer satisfaction information, including surveys andratings, can
help a company determine how to best improve or changes itsproducts and
services.
2
Customer satisfaction is a term frequently used in marketing. It is a
measure of how products and services supplied by a company meet or
surpass customer expectation. Customer satisfaction is defined as ‘the
number of customers, or percentage of total customers, whose reported
experience with a firm, its products, its services exceeds specified
satisfaction goals. In researching satisfaction, firms generally ask
customer whether their product or service has met or exceeded
expectations. Thus expectations are a key factor behind satisfaction. When
customers have high expectations and the reality falls short they will be
disappointed and will likely rate their experience as less than satisfying.
The online ordering system can be defined as a simple and convenient way
for customers to purchase food online, without having to go to the
restaurant. The system is enabled by the internet that connects the
restaurants or the food company on one hand, and the customer on other
hand. Therefore as per this system the customer visits the
restaurant’s app or website, browses through the various food items,
combos and cuisines available there and those ahead and selects and
purchases the items he or she needs. These items will be then be
3
delivered to the customer at his or her doorstep at the time they choose by
a delivery person. Payments for such online orders can be made through
debit cards, credit cards, cash or card on delivery or even through digital
wallets.
4
ones: This is probably the most publicized customer satisfaction statistic
out there. It costs six to seven times more to acquire new customers than
it does to retain existing customer. Customers costs a lot of money to
acquire.
5
Scope of Study
6
1.3 Review of Literature
1. Bhavya saini (2016) , “Consumer preference and attitude regarding
online food products” the study emphasized that using the internet in
seeking food service information was a common practice among people
living in india and online interpersonal influence took a fundamental apart.
A high percentage of consumers were unconcerned about accurate
evidence regarding food safety in selecting food 12 products on the
internet. The conclusion of our findings produces practical pieces of
advice to consumers buying online food, to food retailers selling food over
the internet and to the government of india to implement appropriate
legislation regarding online food product information. Among all these
factors customers usually expect three website merits toassist their online
encounters that are system quality, information quality, and service
quality.
2. Hong Lan (2016), “Online food delivery market is immature yet, there
are some obvious problems that can be seen from consumers” negative
comments. In order to solve these problems, we can neither relymerely on
the self discipline of online food delivery restaurants nor the supervision
and management of online food delivery platforms. Only by taking laws
as the criterion, with the joined efforts of the online food delivery
platforms and restaurants, the government departments concerned,
consumers and all parties in the society, can these problems be solved and
good online take away environment can be created .
3. Sumathy (2017), “A study on prospective concernment towards food
adjure app” the online food adjure app system will be helpful for the hotels and
restaurants to increase the scope of the business by helping users to
give order through online. This study was to find the awareness
7
level and satisfaction derived by the consumer and also to find which
factor influence customers to buy food through online from food adjure
app. Most of the respondents disagree to the fact that online website
charges high delivery fees. Almost all users feel safe paying online. The
service rendered by the food adjure app is the major factor behind its
success.
4. Sheryl E. Kimes (2011), His study found that perceived control and
perceived convenience associated with the online food ordering services
were important for both users and non-users. Non-users need more
personal interaction and also had higher technology anxiety to use the
service.
5. Varsha Chavan, et al, (2015), The use of smart device based interface
for customers to view, order and navigate has helped the restaurants in
managing orders from customers immediately. The capabilities of
wireless communication and smart phone technology in fulfilling and
improving business management and service delivery. Their analysis
states that this system is convenient, effective and easy to use, which is
expected to improve the overall restaurant business incoming times.
6. Leong Wai Hong (2016), the technological advancements in many
industries have changed the business model to grow. Efficient system can
help improve the productivity and profitability of a restaurant . The use of
online food delivery system is believed that it can lead the restaurant’s
business grow from time to time and will help the restaurants to facilitate
major business online.
7. Serhat Murat Alagoz & Haluk Hekimoglu (2012), E commerce is
rapidly growing worldwide, the food industry is also showing a steady
growth. In this research paper they have used the Technology
8
Acceptance Model (TAM) as a ground to study the acceptance of online
food ordering system. Their data analysis revealed that the attitude towards
online food ordering vary according to ease and usefulness of online food
ordering process and also vary according to their innovativeness against
information technology, their trust in e-retailers and various external
influences.
8. Ramesh Kumar Bagla, Jasmine Khan. The purpose of this study was to
investigate the factors that are responsible for the growing popularity of
online booking and ordering of food in india, expectations of the users,
and their satisfaction levels with the popular apps such as food panda,
Zomato, Swiggy. Descriptive research was undertaken on the basis
of primary data collected from the respondents residing in National Capital
Region of Delhi chosen through nonprobability convenience sampling
using structured questionnaire. Findings was the 14 factors contributing to
the popularity of online food ordering were found to be : lack of time to
prepare food, availability of variety, rewardsand cashbacks. There is a
scope of improving the user’s satisfaction levels by understanding their
expectations more precisely and offering more attractive options while
ordering food online.
9. Kumaran. M. (2017), has conducted a study on “perception towards
online shopping an empirical study with respect to Indian buyers ” . This
research deals with E- marketing researches concerning the factors which
affects consumer perception towards online purchasing experiences, this
research dealt with the perceived risks, website role, domain specific
innovativeness, subjective norms, attitude perceived usefulness,
perceived ease of use, attitude, online shopping intention and online
shopping behavior. There are many reasons for people preferring online
shopping but the major reason for a consumer backing out from
9
online shopping is the security issues but the industry has given little
concern to this issue.
10. Jyotishman Das (2018), the doorstep delivery is the most highly
ranked factor of influencing the consumers to use the food ordering
applications. The consumers are also often influenced by discounts and
cashbacks they enjoy. On comparing the factors the most preferredservice
provider came out to be Zomato followed by Swiggy. 1.4
10
Research Methodology
Research methodology is a way to systematically solve the research problem. The
research methodology includes the various methods and techniques for conducting
research.
Research Design
because it was research where our own views about the research were given.
11
adopts in selecting items for the sample. The following factors need to be
decided within the scope of sample design.
The universe consists of all survey elements that qualify for the inclusion in
the research study. The population or universe represents the entire group of
units which is the focus of the study. The universe in my research was the
respondents who uses telecom services of Vodafone ltd.
study. Keeping in mind all the constraints 100 respondents were selected.
Sample Unit: Sampling unit is the basic containing the elements of the
Primary Sources: Primary data are those which are collected a fresh and
for the first time and thus happen to be original in character. Primary data
has been collected by conducting surveys through questionnaire, which
12
include Likert Scale questions and both open ended and close ended
questions.
Secondary Sources: Secondary data are those which has been collected by
someone else which already had been passed through the statistical process.
In this research project secondary source used were books and websites.
Tools of Presentation: It means what tools were used to present the data in a
13
1.5 Limitations of the study
14
CHAPTER-2
PROFILE OF THE
ORGANIZATION
15
CHAPTER 2
PROFILE OF THE ORGANIZATION
2.1 HISTORY
Zomato is an Indian multinational restaurant aggregator and food
delivery company founded by Deepinder Goyal and Pankaj Chaddah in
2008. Zomato provides information, menus and user-reviews of
restaurants as well as food delivery options from partner restaurants in
select cities. As of 2019, the service is available in 24 countries and in
more than 10,000 cities.
Zomato was founded as FoodieBay in 2008, and was
renamed Zomato on 18 January 2010 as Zomato Media Pvt. Ltd. In
2011, it expanded across India to Delhi
NCR, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Pune, Ahmedabad and Hyderabad.
In 2012, it expanded operations internationally in several countries,
including the United Arab Emirates, Sri Lanka, Qatar, the United
Kingdom, the Philippines, and South Africa. In 2013, expanded to in New
Zealand, Turkey, Brazil and Indonesia, with website and apps available
in Turkish, Portuguese, Indonesian and English languages. In April
2014, it launched in Portugal, which was followed by launches
in Canada, Lebanon and Ireland in 2015.
Zomato started off in 2010 after rebranding from food directory website
Foodiebay. The company was India’s first foodtech unicorn and has
continued to add new features besides delivery and discovery.
Zomato extended its subscription-based Zomato Gold programme to
deliveries despite controversy and criticism
Like most other startups, India’s pioneering foodtech unicorn Zomato
has seen many peaks and troughs in its journey. While there were some
16
illustrious moments and accomplishments, there were troubled times
too, some that even brought the very existence of the company into
question.
During the massive layoffs and losses of 2015, chances of Zomato’s
survival seemed slim. In a belt tightening move, the company laid off
about 300 employees — nearly 10% of its total headcount — to cut costs
in its weaker business aspects and shift the focus to more revenue-
generating areas like reservations.
17
Financial. Ant Financial’s $200 Mn investment earlier this year led
Zomato to cross the $1 Bn valuation.
During this time, Zomato also kept working on its tech backbone to
match the boom in the smartphone trend and launched its app. The
company also started aggressively acquiring foreign competition to
increase its foothold in other countries. In 2014, Zomato acquired
Gastronauci, Poland’s restaurant search service, and Cibando, an Italian
restaurant finder. The next year, Zomato made its biggest acquisition —
US-based online table reservation platform NexTable. Soon after, it
acquired another US-based restaurant directory, Urbanspoon, but had to
shut the app within just five months.
After a slow 2016, in which Zomato saw further loss in revenues, the
company decided to roll back operations in nine of the countries it had
expanded to, handling them remotely to ensure it did not lose out on the
markets.
18
A Decade of Experience
Ups and downs are something all startups see in their journey to
becoming industry mammoths, how they handle their trying times
and the decisions they take make or break them.
Both have recorded monthly cash burns in the range of $10 Mn – $12
Mn and this is largely driven by marketing and acquisition costs for
users such as discounts, promos and ads. Additionally, adding new
delivery agents and tech capability is also a major cost centre for these
foodtech companies. At the same time they are also expanding to
newer services such as Zomato with its dining-out features, and Swiggy
with Swiggy Go hyperlocal delivery.
19
Zomato’s goodwill. But the company has not scrapped Zomato Gold —
only changing its terms to favour restaurants a little more — but in fact
double down with Gold for deliveries too. Zomato is constantly
changing things to get the revenue boost.
The report also mentioned that there has been a 40% decline in
Zomato’s EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and
amortization) loss from March to September 2019. The company has
also pointed out that its monthly burn rate, which measures the rate at
which a company is losing money, is down by 60%.
20
The controversial Zomato Gold service has registered a 180% increase
with 1.4 Mn users. With an eventful FY20, Zomato’s rival Swiggy has
also been out on the block seeking fresh funds. The Bengaluru-based
food delivery unicorn is also in talks to raise $500 Mn fresh funds led by
Naspers at a valuation of $3.3 Bn.
Even as the two foodtech giants battle it out, there’s a bigger player
on the horizon with Amazon about to launch its food delivery and
cloud kitchen services in India.
VISSION OF ZOMATO
MISSION OF ZOMATO
Zomato's mission statement is “better food for more people.” Since our
inception in 2008, we have grown tremendously, both in scope and scale
- and emerged as India's most trusted brand during the pandemic, along
with being one of the largest hyperlocal delivery networks in the
country.
21
2.3 Zo mat o’s Business Model
The success of Zomato lies in its robust Business Model. Essentially
Zomato is an application whose business model encircles the provision
of food delivery services, provision of information, user reviews, and
menus of partner restaurants. Zomato stands as the pioneer for
other online food-based applications. Following are the critical
elements of Zomato’s business model:
2.4 Acquisitions
Zomato has acquired 12 startups globally.
23
On 29 June 2021, the firm signed a deal with Grofers to invest nearly
$120 Million in the online grocery firm by acquiring 9.3% stakes of
the company.
1) Swiggy
Swiggy is a food ordering and delivery company based out of
Bangalore, India. Swiggy was inspired by the thought of providing a
complete food ordering and delivery solution from the best
neighbourhood restaurants to the urban foodie.
2) Uber Eats
Uber Eats is an online food ordering and delivery platform launched
by Uber in 2014. Users can read menus, reviews and ratings, order, and
pay for food from participating restaurants using an application on
the iOS or Android platforms, or through a web browser. Users are also
able to tip for delivery. Payment is charged to a card on file with Uber.
Meals are delivered by couriers using cars, scooters, bikes, or on foot. It
is operational in over 6,000 cities across 45 countries.
24
3) Faasos
Faasos is an Indian "food on demand" service that was
incorporated in 2004. It is one of the brands owned by the online
restaurant company, Rebel Foods.
4) Domino's Pizza
The Domino's Pizza, anywhere at anytime! It's fun and interactive and
puts you in control! With more than 1.4 million possible pizza
combinations, the Domino's App takes ordering to the next level.
Domino's pizza comes with a 30-minute guarantee from the time an
order is placed. If the time taken to deliver the pizza is more than 30
minutes, the pie comes free if it costs under Rs 300.
5) Pizza Hut
The delivery speed and the quality of Pizza Hut's ingredients are far
better than Domino's. Pizza Hut isn't always great though. Critics say
that they generally serve smaller portions of food than Domino's. Apart
from this, they also offer fewer types of pizza than Domino's.
25
CHAPTER-3
ANALYSIS &
INTREPRETATION
OF DATA
26
CHAPTER-3
ANALYSIS & INTREPRETATION OF DATA
The data has been processed and analysed by tabulation and
interpretation so that findings can be communicated and can be easily
understood. The findings are presented in the best possible way.
Tables and graphs have been used for illustrations of findings of the
research.
17-18
19-20
21-22
23-24
25-26
INTREPRETATION: The pie chart shows age wise classification of respondents it, reveals that
2% of the total respondents is aged between 17-18 , 4% is aged between 19-20, 10% of the
respondents aged between 21-22, 54% belongs to the age group 23-24 , and 30% belongs to the
age group 25-26
27
Statement 5.2 Showing the gender of the respondents.
Male
Female
28
Statement 5.3 Which app do you usually use apart from
“Zomato”?
No. Of Respondents
Swiggy
Uber Eats
Pizza Hut
29
Statement 5.4 How often do you use “Zomato”.
Almost Daily 2 2
2-3 times a week 30 30
2-3 times a month 60 60
Not often 8 8
No. Of Respondents
Almost Daily
2-3 times a week
2-3 times a month
Not often
30
Statement 5.5: How much money do you usually spend on
“Zomato”?
Below 150 5 5
200-300 30 30
300-400 50 50
More than 400 15 15
Total 100 100
No. Of Respondents
Below 150
200-300
300-400
More than 400
31
Statement 5.6 What is the single most important factor for
you to choose “Zomato”?
Discount 60 60
Fast Delivery 30 30
Cost of food 10 10
Total 100 100
No. Of Respondents
Discount
Fast Delivery
Cost of food
32
Statement 5.7 How do you find the prices at “Zomato”?
No. Of Respondents
Expensive
Very Expensive
33
Statement 5.8 How do you find the behavior of staff at
Zomato?
Average 5 5
Good 50 50
Excellent 45 45
Total 100 100
34
Statement 5.9 Would you recommend Zomato to your family
and friends?
Yes 90 90
No 4 4
Can’t Say 6 6
Total 100 100
35
Statement 5.10 Are you satisfied with the delivery of
Zomato?
Yes 80 80
No 12 12
Can’t Say 8 8
Total 100 100
No. Of Respondents
Yes
No
Can’t Say
36
Statement 5.11 How would you rate the quality of food of
Zomato?
Average 30 30
Good 50 50
Excellent 20 20
Total 100 100
No. Of Respondents
Average
Good
Excellent
37
Statement 5.12 Are you satisfied with the menu of Zomato?
Percentage Of
Options No. Of
Respondents
Respondents
Yes 80 80
No 12 12
Can’t Say 8 8
Total 100 100
No. Of Respondents
Yes
No
Can’t Say
38
SUMMARISIED FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
39
CHAPTER-4
CONCLUSION &
RECOMMENDATIONS
40
CONCLUSION
In this highly competitive market the survival and the success of a
company depends on innovation and changing thing for betterment.
Odds of success for a startup is very bad, according to statistics 9 out of
10 startup fails. All the startup should consider and gaining from the
strategies used by zomato for its steady growth.
41
RECOMMENDATIONS
Zomato should have there own delivery system with the amount
of funds they have.
42
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.) Google forms
4
ANNEXURES
1) 1. Age
o 17-18
o 19-20
o 21-22
o 23-24
o 25-26 2
2) Gender
o Male
o Female
Swiggy
Uber Eats
Pizza Hut
Almost Daily
2-3 times a week
2-3 times a month
Not often
5) How much money do you usually spend on “Zomato”?
Below 150
200-300
300-400
44
More than 500
Discount
Fast Delivery
Cost of food
Economical
Expensive
Very Expensive
45
11) How would you rate the quality of food of Zomato?
Average
Good
Excellent
12) Are you satisfied with the menu of Zomato?
Yes
No
Can’t Say
46