Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nursing Documentation Workshop
Nursing Documentation Workshop
Scenario 1:
Number 1:
Diane's documentation certainly captures the essential actions she took during her
shift and how Mr. Cruz responded to them. Here is a critique based on the characteristics of
effective documentation, which typically emphasizes clarity, completeness, accuracy, and
relevance.
Strengths:
1. Timeliness: Diane documented the time at which the significant events (medication
administration and dressing change) occurred, which helps in maintaining a
chronological record of the patient's care.
2. Response to Intervention: Diane mentioned how Mr. Cruz tolerated the dressing
change, which is a good practice as it records the patient's response to the nursing
interventions.
Areas for Improvement:
1. Thoroughness:
The documentation does not capture the pain scale rating before and after
administering the pain medication. Including these values would offer a
clearer picture of the effectiveness of the intervention.
Diane did not document her observation regarding Mr. Cruz's facial grimacing
and limping, which indicated the pain he was experiencing. This initial
assessment is important to record as it provides a baseline against which to
measure the impact of interventions.
The description of the wound is somewhat lacking. Although she mentioned
that the wound looked clean and was healing, a more detailed description of
the wound characteristics observed (such as size, color, type of drainage,
presence of granulation tissue, etc.) would provide a better insight into the
wound's current state.
2. Clarity:
NURSING DOCUMENTATION WORKSHOP
September 14-15, 2023
Submitted by: JULIE ANN T. BIOL, RN
The statement "Wound looks clean and healing" is quite subjective. A more
objective and detailed description of the wound's appearance and any signs
of infection or healing should be included.
Using more standardized terminology to describe the wound and drainage
might enhance clarity. For instance, instead of "some pus," she could quantify
or describe the characteristics of the pus in more detail.
3. Relevance:
The documentation could benefit from including relevant details about Mr.
Cruz’s general condition during her shift, like his mental status, ambulatory
ability, etc., especially considering that he lives alone and is planned to return
to his apartment.
Incorporating information about the patient's decreased sensation in the
affected area, which might be a significant point in assessing the progress or
potential complications of the ulcer.
4. Reflection of Nursing Process:
The documentation could offer insights into Diane's critical thinking and
clinical judgment process. For instance, her decision to change the dressing
could be substantiated with her assessment findings, like the reduced pain
score.
Overall, while Diane's documentation does cover the basic interventions and responses,
incorporating more detailed and objective information reflecting her complete assessment,
and using a standardized language can improve the quality and effectiveness of her
documentation. This would ensure a comprehensive and accurate reflection of Mr. Cruz's
current state and the care he received.
Number 2:
Scenario 2: