Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BUPRG Note - Black Start DG
BUPRG Note - Black Start DG
1.1 Business Unit and Location : Shared Services – Central Electrical Maintenance -
TATA STEEL MERAMANDALI
1.2 Scheme Description : Emergency power availability by installation &
commissioning of Black Start Diesel Generator
1.3 Nature of Investment : Sustenance
1.15 Shutdown Requirement : No Interconnection with the existing system during planned
shut-down
1.16 FEL1 Readiness :
1
Form No: CPL/F/02
Planning & Budgeting CHECKLIST & GUIDELINES
Capital Planning SHEET: 2 of 11
TITLE: BU-PRG Recommendation Note REV NO: 05
DOC. NO: CPL/CHK/01 EFFECTIVE DATE: 16-09-21
1. Background
6 110MW PP 1 33 33
DRI Units
7 110MW PP 1 77 77
Total 776
1 11.03.2021 5
2 07.08.2021 8
3 02.12.2022 1
2
Plant Power consumption load
S.N. Plant unit name Peak Power load Avg. power load Remarks
• At present there are 3 major power generating stations, namely – BFPP 1, 2 & AEL.
• Capacity of BFPP 1 is 20MW + 12MW, BFPP 2 is 165MW & Capacity of AEL is 150 + 150 +
165MW. (Details mentioned in Table A)
• This generation is sufficient enough to sustain the load of complete plant except HSM & CONARC
(as these are highly varying loads).
• Using the generation of AEL & BFPP1&2, base production of the plant can continue even if power
is disconnected from the OPTCL Grid.
• At black outs, we have to wait for OPTCL Grid power to charge our station switchgears through
which auxiliaries of boilers & TG are started and after this in-house generation of BFPP/AEL is
obtained.
Note: Auxiliaries means the motors of boilers, cooling water system, compressors. These help in
generating steam from boilers, circulation of cooling water for generators, supply of compressed
air for operation of valves. Collectively all help in generation of power from generators.
• In many cases, OPTCL Grid power takes a very long time for restoration due to major faults at the
OPTCL Grids/Transmission line. During this time, the boilers & furnaces gets cooled down and
after power restoration - cold start takes high time.
• This increases the startup time of our in house generation & steel plant production is highly
hampered.
• Example: Similar incident had earlier occurred on 11.03.2021, when Grid fault occurred & Islanding
system failed.
(On 11.03.2021, due to fault at grid end. 220kV Line 2 ‘Y’ & ‘B’ Phase Conductor at grid end got
snapped and it took about 5 Hours for its restoration. Even Line-1 was charged after 1.5 Hours.
Due to this delay, it took more than 12 hours to start full-fledged production of the plant) (Details
in Table B)
• Again, at blackout condition, if there is a fire incident in any of the site then it would be difficult to
extinguish the fire due to unavailability of power in pumps feeding water to fire hydrant lines.
• The water for fire extinction comes from the raw water pump house, which do not have any DG
Pumps or Emergency power supply.
• Also, as we have a contract demand of 90MVA - time taken to start up complete plant would be
delayed after grid power restoration. It is because, we have to slowly start up each plants keeping
in mind that power import does not exceed 90MVA.
3
2. Evaluations of Alternative Options/ Option Analysis
Capex
Timeline
SN Alternative /Opex Advantages Disadvantages Remarks
(In months)
(Rs Cr)
Depends on the
severity of fault at
Waiting till 220KV Line &
No capital Plant production
1 grid power is Nil OPTCL or even
expenditure hampered
restored any internal
transmission line
fault
Alternative
No other
option as
alternati
proposed
2 ve N/A N/A N/A N/A
shall be
availabl
indicated
e.
here.
3. Proposal:
o As there are 3 major power generating stations – BFPP 1, 2 & AEL, as per study done by
TCE - it is proposed to install black start emergency diesel generator sets of capacity:
31.2MW (4 X 7.8MW) which will sustain the auxiliary loads of these power plants. Emergency
power to BFPP 1, 2 & AEL will be fed by 33KV tie-lines. (Dependency on 220KV Line during
black-outs will be eliminated).
o Now, instead of procurement of new DG Sets (whose cost will be around 200Cr., as given by
TCE in Nov.22), we plan to move existing HT DG Sets - 2 x 12MW from Sahibabad & 1 x
12MW DG Set from Khopoli to Meramandali works for the start up of BFPP 1, 2 & AEL.
▪ This combined 36MW Capacity will be sufficient for the startup of BFPP 1, 2 &
AEL.
▪ These DG Sets at Sahibabad & Khopoli are presently in idle condition & won’t be
running due to stringent environmental norms.
▪ By shifting the units from Sahibabad & Khopoli we will be utilizing the existing asset &
the black start purpose at Meramandali plant will also be solved.
Note: As there was no in-house generations in Sahibabad & Khopoli, the DGs were installed for
running of plant independently without the help of Govt. grid.
Presently due to stringent environmental norms, the DGs aren’t running there & is in idle state.
Power requirements of Sahibabad & Khopoli is met by import from Govt. grid or via power
wheeling from other Tata Steel generating units.
Note:
• Feasibility study of complete project is suggested. This will give us:
o More optimized cost estimation.
o Details/health condition & emissions regarding complete equipment.
4. Project Scope:
4
As per the assessment done after site visit at Sahibabad, the scope of work is broadly classified
in following 5 categories:
Location of installation of DG: MRSS-2 existing 220KV AIS (which will be converted to GIS).
Digitalization/ Automation
Safety
Operations
• Black out restoration SOP will be revised & same to be communicated to entire steel plant.
• Operation team to follow the recommended SOP for starting of boiler & turbine auxiliaries.
Impact on number of Control Room
• New control room to be set up for monitoring & operation of new proposed DG Sets.
• Provision for uninterrupted reliable communication with the DG Sets control room to be made
with control rooms of power plants.
Land
• Existing land – 220KV AIS of MRSS 2 to be used for installation of DG Sets.
• MRSS 2 GIS Building (Old LDC Room) to be used for control room
Utilities
Water
• To be taken from MRSS 2 (Already available)
Power
• To be taken from MRSS 2 (Already available)
Regulatory Challenges
5
Execution Strategies
Packaging strategy
• N/A
Amount
Input Tax
Gross of (Net of Basis of
SN Category Credit (in
GST (Rs.Cr.) tax) (in estimates
Cr.)
Cr.)
Dismantling & shifting the
On assumption
healthy equipment to the new
1. 17.7 2.7 15 basis
site in Odisha (along with
insurance)
Note: Assumption
Upgradation of existing
is based on
2 equipment & replacement of 14.16 2.16 12
experience of
worn-out parts
past projects.
Procurement of new
3 29.5 4.5 25 Detailed study is
equipment
needed for
4 Civil & structural work 29.5 4.5 25
proper cost
5 Cost of additional services 17.7 2.7 15
estimation.
6 Contingency (5%) 5.42 0.82 4.6
Total 113.98 17.38 96.6
Unit of Base
Parameters As Is To Be Benchmark
Measurement Year
Start Up of
plant after black Hours 2023 12 1
out
6
7. Environment and Carbon Emission KPIs:
(Indicate Air Pollution (CO2, Sox, Nox, Fugitive, etc.), Water Consumption, Effluent Discharge,
Solid Waste Management as per EC/CTO norms along with Benchmark. Also, indicate the
percentage recycling of water and wastes generated.)
Unit of Base
Parameters As Is To Be Benchmark
Measurement Year
NOX mg/Nm3 2023 0 368
The mentioned
SO2 mg/Nm3 2023 0 29.2 figures are as per
the reports from
Sahibabad.
CO2 (%) (v/v) 2023 0 9.5
8. Regulatory Challenges:
Provide the details of statutory requirement, if any, with expected timeline of clearances. Indicate the statutory
clearances addressed to enable the site work.
9. Financials:
Not Applicable, as the project does not give any tangible savings.
The estimated cost of project on assumption basis would be Rs. 96.6 Cr. (Including additional 5% cost
in contingency cases- NGST)
Input tax
Year Gross of GST credit (at Net of GST
18% GST)
FY23-24 0 0 0
FY24-25 36 6.48 42.48
FY25-26 60 10.8 70.8
TOTAL 96 17.28 113.28
7
11. Risk and Mitigation Strategy
(Risk assessment of all new growth/strategic projects above Rs 700 crores per project (US$100m) should be carried out and
signed off by ERM before the project is placed to Peer Review Group)
12. Project Schedule of Major Milestones (include the project schedule of major milestones till
commissioning and hand-over of project)
Timelines
ACTIVITIES
(MM/YY)
Approval of project Dec.23
Placement of order Apr.24
Study of the project & detailed engineering Aug.24
Drawing approvals Oct.24
Shifting of equipment Dec.24
Erection of structures & buildings Dec.25
Supply of additional equipment Jul.26
Installation, Testing, Commissioning & Trails Dec.26
8
Annexure :1
Project Owner to arrange for sign-off from relevant stakeholders as per following table
SN Yes / No/
Parameter Signoff from
NA
1 Validating operational assumption & KPI impact Project Owner
Chief of the operating
2 Higher production volume
division
3 Product Mix / Realization Marketing and Sales
4 Capital/ Revenue nature F&A
Chief Power System &
5 Power & Gas
Energy
-Chief Corporate
6 Land
Administration
Building up of new infrastructure or relocation of an
7 Infrastructure Committee
existing one
Chief Environment
8 Approval from Environment Management
Management
Chairman of Electrics &
9 Approval from Obsolescence Committee Automation Obsolescence
Management Committee
10 Approval from ME&VRC Chairman ME&VRC
11 Automation/Digitalization Chief IT (BU)
Scope Matrix
12 Case 2: BU with support of E&P: Partial help from GM D&E/ Project Owner Case 2
E&P as per Annexure 2
9
Annexure A:
10
5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO MAKE THE DG SETS OPERATIONAL AT
NEW SITE
PICTURES FROM THE SITE VISIT AT SAHIBABAD TO HAVE AN IDEA ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE
PROJECT:
11
Form No: CPL/F/02
Planning & Budgeting CHECKLIST & GUIDELINES
Capital Planning SHEET: 11 of 11
TITLE: BU-PRG Recommendation Note REV NO: 05
DOC. NO: CPL/CHK/01 EFFECTIVE DATE: 16-09-21
Annexure 2: Scope Matrix for BU Executed projects which needs E&P support
L1 Project Environment
Project Phase Concept Note Basic Design Cost Estimation Risk Assessment PRG Note
Schedule Impact
A. Pre-Approval –
Readiness of project
for PRG
12