Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Infrastructure in India - Ports, Roads and Telecom
Infrastructure in India - Ports, Roads and Telecom
January 10
Content
3.5 3.6
4 5
Total
Figures as on March 2009
555.67
Under the 11 five-year plan, the government plans to invest about USD 19 billion to increase the cargo handling capacity of Indian ports by 2012. Of this, about USD 11.7 billion is expected to be contributed by the private sector.
th
Chart one depicts the projected investment in port infrastructure in India in 200712. Chart One Projected Investment in Port Infrastructure (200712)
5.2
CAGR 19 percent
3.7
USD Billion
4.3
3.5
2.6
1.5
3.0
2.2 1.7 2.8
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.7
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10 Year
Public Private
2010-11
2011-12
Of the total planned investment, about USD 13.2 billion will be spent on major ports and about USD 5.9 billion on non-major ports. Of major ports, about 6.7 billion will be invested by private investors. For nonmajor ports, about USD 5 billion will come from private investors. Investments under the current five-year plan indicate the importance that the government has placed on private participation (about 61 percent by investment) in port development.
Infrastructure in India Ports, Roads, and Telecom industry estimates, total cargo traffic at Indian ports is expected to grow to about 860 million tonne by 2011 12. Chart One Cargo Traffic at Indian Ports
CAGR 9 percent
million tonnes
521.6
137.8
569.1
145.5
649.9
186.1
722.9
203.6
738.1
207.8
860.0
270.0
383.8
423.6
463.8
519.2
530.4
590.0
2004 - 05
2005 - 06
2006 - 07 Year
Major Ports
2007 - 08
2008 - 09
2011 - 12
Expected
Non-major Ports
Table Two Key Parameters Parameters Average turnaround time (days) Average preberthing time (hours) Average output per ship per berth day (tonne) 0001 4.24 11.04 0708 2.63 11.4 0809
(provisional)
2.44 9.95
The average turnaround time has been stable for nearly two years as vessels of higher tonnage are increasingly berthing at ports. Further, the average output/ship/berth/day has shown a consistently increasing trend, indicating improved cargo handling at the ports. However, the average pre-berthing had increased because of capacity constraints on handling specific commodities (food grains and fertilisers are on priority) in certain ports. Quick fact The turnaround time of ships in ports such as Singapore is six to eight hours.
6,961
10,071
10,464
As on Aug 2009
Traffic levels at Indian ports have been consistently indicating the need for urgent capacity expansion plans of ports. During the last five years, Table Three - Capacity Expansion Plans at Indian Ports major ports have been operating at a utilisation rate of over 90 percent. This, coupled with traffic Capacity in 2008 Planned Capacity by Ports growth at CAGR of over 9 09 (mn tonne) 201112 (mn tonne) percent, presents a case for capacity expansion. The Major Ports 555.67 1,001.8 government plans to invest about Non-major USD 19 billion to increase the 230 NA Ports cargo handling capacity of ports by 2012. Of this, about USD 11.7 billion is expected from private sources through PPPs in the development of berths, container terminals and warehousing/ storage facilities. India will build 50 new ports over the next five years as it looks to overhaul creaky infrastructure and reduce congestion at ports - APVN Sarma, Secretary, Ministry of Shipping July 2009
Infrastructure in India Ports, Roads, and Telecom Currently, operational issues such as land acquisition, environmental clearances and time consuming inter-ministerial consultations for the approval of port projects continue to impact the growth of the overall sector. As a recent example, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT) struggled for about two years to get approval from the Shipping Ministry for a project that involved deepening of its channel. The contract ultimately got cancelled in 2009 when the lowest bidder sought corrections in the price to reflect the change in rupee-euro exchange rates over time. However, the government has started introducing preliminary changes to ensure easy awarding of port projects. For example, to expedite PPP projects, the Shipping Ministry in 2009 authorised port authorities to award contracts without its prior approval. Some other issues in the port sector are: Presently, the size of draughts at all major ports ranges 912 meters, which is insufficient to handle larger vessels, impacting accessibility and the amount of cargo carried (as well as associated turnaround time). There is a need for deeper draught ports and services such as bunkering, coastal shipping, connectivity and hinterland development... - Executive Vice Chairman, Pipavav Port, March 2009 Indian ports have inadequate connectivity through roads and rails. This stops Indian ports from being perceived as integrated logistics solutions providers. Moreover, this leads to operational inefficiency, increasing logistic cost and turn-around time.
Ministry of Shipping, Government of India (Formulation of policies and supervision of the sector)
Central Level
State Maritime Board/ Port departments of State Government (Supervises ports and determines tariff at non-major ports)
State Level
Non-major Ports
In 2009, the government prepared a draft bill for bringing in all non-major ports under the purview of Tariff Authority for Major Ports (TAMP). Presently, non-major ports fix tariff on their own. The government has taken several initiatives for the development of ports and the shipping sector including the following: Budgetary Allocations The government has proposed an outlay of USD 4 billion for infrastructure development at major ports during the current five-year plan. Also, for non-major ports, the government has proposed an outlay of about USD 1 billion during this same period. The remaining th public funds under the 11 plan are expected to come from internal and extra budgetary support. National Maritime Development Program (NMDP) The NMDP was launched by the government in 2005. The programme envisages total investment of USD 22 billion (with an original timeline of 25 years) aiming at the expansion of cargo handling capacities at Indian ports and enhancing overall competitiveness of the maritime sector. The program includes 253 ports projects scheduled to be completed by 201112 and 111 shipping and inland water transport projects to be completed by 2016. Table Four Status of Projects under NMDP Total Planned 253 111 Under Approval Process 25 NA Preliminary Planning Stage 92 63
Completed 41 5
In Progress 64 43
Approved 31 NA
* Figures as on March 2009; #IWT - Shipping and Inland Water Transport Project
...Six to seven projects have been cleared so far and.we are hoping to award a total of 22 project during the current financial year (2009-10) APVN Sarma, Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, August 2009
Of the total investment planned under NMDP, about USD 12.3 billion will be spent on port projects. Of this, only 6 percent (USD 740 million) will be funded through budgetary support. While for shipping and IWT projects, about 30 percent of the planned investment (USD 2.9 billion) would be funded through budgetary support. The chart below shows the break-up of fund sources for investments planned under NMDP: Chart Two Sources of Funds for Investments Planned under NMDP
Private Sector
Budgetary Support
Infrastructure in India Ports, Roads, and Telecom Approval for Port-based SEZs The government has so far given formal approval to seven portbased Special Economic Zones (SEZs) or port-based multi-product SEZs. These SEZs have been allowed preferential tax treatment. Some of the tax benefits allowed to units in such areas are duty free import (or domestic procurement) of capital goods, raw materials, etc; exemption of domestic sales from Special Additional Duty (SAD); exemption from income tax; etc. Port Connectivity Projects The government has awarded projects for port connectivity on high priority. Under this programme, it envisaged a plan for the construction of 380-km road-port connectivity projects and 3,666 km rail-port connectivity projects. Table five shows the status of port connectivity projects as of March 2009. Table Five Status of Port Connectivity Projects Length Under Implementation (Km) 168 1,696
As India attempts to double its share in the global trade from the current 1.6 percent level, industry experts believe that the port sector will see a shipping boom in the next few years, similar to the trend witnessed by China few years ago. India will be the next China (and see a shipping boom) in the next few years - Tobias Konig, Managing Partner, Konig and Cie, April 2009
17
CAGR 11 %
11
USD billion
12
13
14
6
3 8
4 8
11
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10 Private
2010-11
2011-12
Public
Chart Two depicts project-wise split of investment during 200712. Chart Two Project-wise break-up of investment in the road sector in India (200712)
31 28
No Private Sector participation expected
USD billion
17
14
22
8 1
8 1 NE Roads
National Highways
Rural Roads
Private
The road density in India is low at 3 km per 1,000 people (world average of 6.7 km) and 750 km per 1,000 square km (world average of 840 km). Currently, several government programs are launched to develop about 420,000 km of road network. Some of these programs are the National Highway Development Program (NHDP), Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY), Special Accelerated Road Development Program for North East, etc. The projects are financed through sources such as budgetary allocation, funding by bilateral/multilateral agencies, Central Road Fund (cess on petrol and diesel) or through private participation (a majority of it is for toll projects).
Quick Facts Fact One About 15 percent of national highways and 2 percent of state highways are four/six/eight laned. Fact Two Approximately 60 percent of national highways and 20 percent of state highways have double lanes. Fact Three About 25 percent of national highways are single/intermediate lanes.
The Indian government has realised the importance of private players in developing road infrastructure, and thus have taken several initiatives, such as introducing SPV route, setting up of Viability Gap Fund (VGF), and launching standard bidding documents and model concession agreement. This has helped increase private participation in road projects by multi-folds.
National highways are planned to facilitate medium- and long-distance inter-city passenger and freight traffic across the country. Similarly, state highways are planned to carry the passenger and freight traffic within the state, while district and village roads are for regions within villages and districts.
I have set a target of 20 km of road per day leading to 7,000 km in a year, my job is to create a paradigm shift in attitude, kilometres and approach - Mr. Kamal Nath, Union Minister of Surface Transport and Highways, July 2009 The road sector has experienced increased private sector participation with the adoption of PPP mechanism by the government. Project worth approximately USD 10 billion have already been awarded; of which about 60 percent were on BOT Toll basis (as of June 2009). Toll collection is a strong function of two factors toll rate and traffic volume. The current tolling rates are pre-decided by the government and are adjusted each year. Estimates for traffic growth for the projects are provided by the government. However, bidders carry out independent traffic projection for each project. More than 50 foreign firms have participated in about 90 projects with participation estimated to be USD 2.4 billion (either in JVs or independent). NHDP The NHDP was launched by the government of India to upgrade highways in the country in six phases. Phase I and Phase II comprised the Golden Quadrilateral (GQ) (5,846 km), NS-EW Corridor (7,142 km), port connectivity (356 km) and other road projects (801 km) at an estimated cost of USD 14 billion. As of September 2007, these phases needed a total investment of USD 9 billion (USD 6 billion market borrowings, USD 0.9 billion private investment and rest from budgetary support). Phase-III comprises upgrading and four-laning 12,109 km of national highways at an estimated cost of USD 12 billion. The cost is expected to be financed through market borrowings (USD 4 billion) and private investment (USD 7.6 billion). Phase IV consists of double-laning 20,000 km of highways at a cost of USD 5.4 billion (USD 0.45 billion market borrowings). Phase V comprises six-laning 6,500 km of the GQ stretch at a cost of USD 3.8 billion (USD 3.5 billion private investments).
10
Infrastructure in India Ports, Roads, and Telecom Phase VI involves the construction of 1,000 km of expressways at an estimated cost of USD 3.7 billion (USD 2.8 billion from private players).
Rural Connectivity The PMGSY is a 100 percent centrally sponsored scheme, and is the biggest project for the rural sector. The scheme was launched in December 2009. As of September 2009, about 64,000 km of road work has been completed under the PMGSY with an investment of about USD 11 billion. Further, the ministry has cleared the development of about 400,000 kms of rural roads for a cost of USD 22 billion. Current Status At present, about 20 percent of the target for road development under the NHDP is complete (at a rate of about 3-8 kms a day). The PPP project awarded - USD 6.5 billion (July 07); USD 8 billion (July 08); 10 billion (June 09). The plan to award 122 projects worth approximately USD 22 billion in 200910 may not be completed by the March 2010 deadline. Consequently, an extension of three months is given by the government.
Recent Developments - The panel to revamp investment norms for the road sector headed by B K Chaturvedi, Member, Planning Commission, Government of India, has made the following suggestions (last quarter year 2009): Abolishing the lock-in period clause that prevented investors from exiting the road project during the concession period Extending government guarantee for loans taken by developers for road projects (to a limited extent) Right of refusal to the existing concessionaire on the expansion project Diluting qualification and conflict of interest norms such as experience of implementing twice the size of the project to be awarded
11
Infrastructure in India Ports, Roads, and Telecom Moreover, the interlinkages among administrative bodies for road network are as follows:
Institutional Advisory Framework Facilitated by Committee on Infrastructure, Planning Commission, Finance Ministry/PPP Cell
Central Level
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (Allocation of funds for the development and maintenance of highways) Department of Road Transport & Highways NHAI (NHDP implementation, operations and maintenance)
Ministry of Rural Development (Allocation of funds for the development and maintenance of rural roads)
State Level
Note In the entire ecosystem, the government plays the role of a facilitator and regulator. Private players, on the other hand, play the role of a developer and operator. These players have a significant presence in the national highway sector, and are exploring participation in the state road sector as well. At the state road level, state road agencies are involved in all the processes. Rural roads have seen almost no participation from private players, and the government plays the dominant role. There are several factors that pose as challenge to the growth of the sector. Issues such as land acquisition, encroachment of highways, environmental clearances, shifting of utilities, railways approvals, local law and order problem continue to impact the growth of the overall sector. Some of other issues in the road sector are as follows: Inconsistency in policy making The Model Concession Agreements and bidding documents have been through several changes, and financing and fiscal provisions have also changed several times. The changes introduced partly address the issues of termination clause, viability gap funding, exit policy, double taxation and dividends (in case of an SPV), and standardisation of bidding documents. This is a reflection of limited stability at the decision-making level. Unavailability of project management tools There is a lack of the availability of adequate tools to ensure efficient project management. Any delay in project completion has corresponding cost implications, which may take the overall cost of the project to significantly high levels. Number of clearances On an average, about 20 signatures are needed to make final decision. This introduces inefficiency in the process of awarding projects. The current processes related to clearances need to be revamped to avoid these inefficiencies.
12
Infrastructure in India Ports, Roads, and Telecom ..The Government will have to reduce the bidding process and bring down it to 5-6 months from almost a year now to achieve its target - Highway Industry Analyst, Dec 2009 The goal set by Mr. Kamal Nath ... is very ambitious, hard to believe - Infrastructure Analyst, Dec 2009
Lack of availability of professional consultants There is a lack of quality professional/consultants in the sector. Moreover, since there are a large number of projects to be awarded in the next few years, the lack of availability of professional consultants and contract managers becomes a significant issue. Other project related issues Several issues such as lower cost of estimated project cost figures in concession agreement (later leading to uncomfortable D-E levels), dispute resolution requirement because of local demands and conditions, need for faster approvals from lenders, and automatic divestment clause continue to hinder the growth of the sector. While Internationally. Build Operate Transfer remains a predominate form of contracts, attracting more than 60 percent of the total investment in privately managed road projects during 200106. Private Activity is concentrated with about 10 countries attracting approximately 90 percent of the total investment during 200106. There is an increased government support, with about one-third of PPP projects (during 200106) receiving some form of government support such as shadow toll, availability fee, subsidies, minimum revenue guarantee. There is an increased need for good governance to manage the monopolistic nature of the concessions and to ensure maximum benefit for the public in PPP projects.
13
Infrastructure in India Ports, Roads, and Telecom Some of the other domestic players are Punj Llyod, L&T, Jaypee, IRB Infrastructure Developers, IL&FS Transportation Networks, Navyuga, etc. Some of the international players operating in road development in India are Berhad, IJM Corporation, SDN and Road Builders (Malaysia), Deutsche Bank, John Laing (The UK), Emirates Trading Agency (Dubai), the Isolux Corsan Group (Spain), Italthai (Thailand), Baelim (Korea), Dyckerhoff (Russia), Widmann AG (Germany), Kajima and Taisei (Japan), and Atlantia Spa (Italy).
14
Some of the factors that impacted the revenues of key companies strongly in 2009 were decreasing minutes of usage (and ARPUs), falling tariffs, stiff competition (about 12 licensees per circle), and high taxes.
15
Investments Expected
The 11th five-year plan anticipates an investment of about USD 54 billion in the telecom infrastructure sector by 2012, backed by opportunities in rural areas, roll out of 3G technology and adequate government support. Private players are expected to contribute more than 69 percent of the total investment in the period. Investment in passive infrastructure will continue to dominate total investment in infrastructure. Passive infrastructure accounts for about 70 percent cost incurred in setting up a wireless telecom network. Further, of the total cost of passive infrastructure, telecom tower accounts for about 70 percent. This makes tower a critical area for the operations of any telecom operator. Chart One Telecom Sector in India
Public-private break-up in Investments in Telecom Infrastructure in India 17
USD Billion
13 10 8 7
4 3 200708
Upcoming Events
200809
Public
Private
As on Jan 2009
38 39
261 392
94 41
52
200506
140 42
165
200708
200708
200809
Wireless Subscribers
Wireline Subscribers
New technologies such as 3G and Wi-Max are expected to be rolled out in 2010 Mobile Number Portability (MNP) is expected to increase competition. Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNO) and associated value- added services will provide necessary impetus to improve ARPUs Subscriber addition from semi-urban and rural areas is expected
2.6 2.2
US Cents
1.1
2005
2007
2009
16
There are several factors that pose challenges to the growth of telecom infrastructure in rural areas. These factors include: Shortage of Electric Power Rural areas face frequent and long power cuts. Due to this, operators need to set up generators and back-up systems for setting up network in such areas. This makes it uneconomical for an operator to set up and run networks at such places. Lack of Uniform Policy on Right of Way (RoW) There is no uniformity on the policy regarding Right of Way (RoW). Different states have varying stance over the issue. This impacts cost outlays and ownership of the cable network. Industry players have urged the government to formulate a uniform policy over the issue that should be binding on the states. Low population density and difficult terrain Other factors that dissuade private operators from expanding their networks in rural areas include low population density and low-income level of people. This reduces the overall return on investment for private players to expand their networks. Further, the situation is aggravated by the difficult terrain in such areas that presents difficulty in laying the network. A snapshot of key telecom associations and regulators is as follows: The Associations The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI): COAI is an association of Indian telecom service providers using Global System for Mobile (GSM) technology. This was constituted in 1995
17
Infrastructure in India Ports, Roads, and Telecom with the objective to protect the common and collective interests of members (primarily service providers). Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (AUSPI): AUSPI is an association of Indian telecom service providers using Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) technology. The association was established in 1997. Regulators Department of Telecommunication (DoT): The DoT is a government body under Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India. The department is responsible for overall supervision, policy making, performance review, licensing of new players, enforcing regulatory measures and international cooperation in the field of telecommunication in the country. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI): It was established in 1997. The body acts a regulator for the telecom sector. Also, the body acts as an advisory organisation for all policy matters related to the telecom sector.
There are 13 service providers and more than 8 telecom tower companies in India. Some of the major players are Bharti Airtel It has more than 100 million subscribers in the country and is among the top five telecom service providers worldwide (by subscriber base). It operates in many segments such as mobile services, telemedia services, enterprise services carriers, enterprise services corporate, and passive infrastructure services in the telecom industry. For the quarter ending September 2009, the
18
Infrastructure in India Ports, Roads, and Telecom net profit of the firm increased by about 35 percent, up from about USD 372 million in the same quarter previous year to about USD 500 million. GTL Infrastructure Ltd. (GIL) It is a subsidiary of Global Group Enterprise. The company, headquartered in Mumbai, is a third-party infrastructure provider established in 2004. It builds, operates and maintains passive network infrastructure for telecom service providers across India. The company plans to establish a pan-India network of 23,700 towers by 2011. The company had revenue of about USD 58 million in fiscal year ending March 2009, an increase of about 80 percent y-o-y. The company had net profit of about USD 0.6 million against a net loss of USD 12.8 million last year. Huawei Telecommunications (India) It is a telecom infrastructure and services provider headquartered in China. Huawei Telecommunications (India) Pvt. Ltd. was established in 2001 and is located in Bangalore. The company supplies telecom equipment such as macro Node B, base station controller (BSC), base transceiver station (BTS), radio network controller and WiMAX base stationto telecom operators worldwide. The company had revenue of about USD 570 million in 2007. In May 2009, it got a USD 150-million contract from Unitech Wireless to supply network equipment. In September 2009, the company opened a new development facility in Bangalore. Recently, the company announced to create an all-IP network infrastructure in over 20,000 towns and 600,000 villages across India. Sterlite Optical Technologies Ltd. The company, based in Pune, is an integrated manufacturer of optical fibers, telecom cables and power transmission conductors. The company supplies telecom and power cables in 60 countries across the world and contributes to about 6 percent of the global optical fiber cables market. The company had revenue of about USD 500 million in fiscal year ending March 2009, an increase of about 20 percent over its revenue last year. The company had net profit of about USD 20 million, a decline of 20 percent over net profit for last year. In January 2009, Tata Teleservices merged its mobile tower companyWireless Tata Tele Info Services Ltd (WTTIL)with Quippo, a tower firm owned by the SREI Group and the Singapore government. As per the deal, the merged company is expected to have an enterprise value of close to USD 2.6 billion with close to 18,000 towers.
19
Infrastructure in India Ports, Roads, and Telecom Active and passive infrastructure sharing is clearly the business model that industry players are opting for to expand their reach in rural areas for the next wave of growth.
Investments in new technologies The auction of spectrum for new technologies (such as 3G and Wi-Max) is on the cards for the Indian telecom industry since quite a long time now. As of December 2009, licences for these technologies were expected to be awarded in February 2010. In two years, Indias tower slot demand may rise to over 700,000 from 320,000 now, as demand from existing and new 2G operators rises and operators (who) begin rolling out 3G and WiMax services Inder Bajaj, President, Reliance Infratel, Nov/Dec 2009 With the advent of the 3G technology, there will be a need for high-quality value-added services. The government plans to allot the licence to four players initially. 3G - Future In India Auction deadline for 3G spectrum in India is chosen to be February 2010 (after a series of delays); however, the allocation is expected to happen only by August 2010, implying there are some months before consumers can avail these services. The government expects to raise more than USD 5 billion from the auction of 3G licenses. As of December 2009, there were close to 100 million 3G capable handsets in the country. Upcoming Markets Wireless The government has set a target to increase rural teledensity to 40 percent in five years from the current 18 percent. Internet In the next five years, the government plans to connect 500,000 villages with wireless broadband.
Recently, DoT permitted Mobile Virtual Network Operations (MVNO) in India. A licence fee of USD 18.5 million for an all-India roll-out of MVNO is expected.
20
4 Sources of Data
Some of the sources of data used in the study were Website of National Highway Authority of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Guidance for Investment in Road Sector, Government of India Website of Ministry of Shipping, Government of India Website of Federation of Chamber of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry Website of Indian Ports Association Websites of CoAI, TRAI, DoT Worldwide trends in Private Participation in Roads, Cesar Queiroz and Ada Karina Izaguirre, Public-Private Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility. Official Memorandum, Revised Strategy of the National Highway Development Project Framework and Financing India Infrastructure Website of Committee of Infrastructure Various industry publications, business dailies, news articles, select databases
Evalueserve Disclaimer
The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Evalueserve disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Evalueserve shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof.
21