Discovering the Universe 10th Edition Comins Solutions Manual

Discovering the Universe 10th Edition

Comins Solutions Manual
Visit to get the accurate and complete content:

https://testbankfan.com/download/discovering-the-universe-10th-edition-comins-soluti
ons-manual/

Visit TestBankFan.com to get complete for all chapters

Discovering the Universe 10th Edition Comins Solutions Manual

Gravitation and the

Waltz of the Planets 2
Chapter Outline
2-1 Science is both a body of knowledge and a process of learning about nature
2-2 The belief in a Sun-centered cosmology formed slowly
2-3 Copernicus devised the first comprehensive heliocentric cosmology
2-4 Tycho Brahe made astronomical observations that disproved ancient ideas about the
heavens
2-5 Kepler’s laws describe orbital shapes, changing speeds, and the lengths of planetary
years
2-6 Galileo’s discoveries strongly supported a heliocentric cosmology
2-7 Newton formulated three laws that describe fundamental properties of physical
reality
2-8 Newton’s description of gravity accounts for Kepler’s laws
2-9 Frontiers yet to be discovered

In This Chapter Students Will Discover…

• What makes a theory scientific
• The scientific discoveries that revealed that Earth is not the center of the universe, as
previously believed
• Copernicus’s argument that the planets orbit the Sun
• Why the direction of motion of each planet on the celestial sphere sometimes appears to
change
• That Kepler’s determination of the shapes of planetary orbits depended on the careful
observations of his mentor Tycho Brahe
• How Isaac Newton formulated an equation to describe the force of gravity and how he
thereby explained why the planets and moons remain in orbit

Suggested Learning Objectives

At the end of this chapter, the student should be able to
1. Compare and contrast the Ptolemaic and Copernican cosmologies by explaining a variety
of naked-eye observations, using both models.
2. State Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion; describe the geometric content and
observational consequences of each.
3. List Galileo’s telescopic observations and explain the success or failure of Ptolemaic and
Copernican models in accounting for them.
4. State and identify examples of Newton’s three laws of motion.
5. State Newton’s law of universal gravitation; identify the characteristics of this law that
explain Kepler’s laws in terms of Newton’s laws.

Visit TestBankFan.com to get complete for all chapters

18

Teaching Hints and Strategies

This chapter deals with the development of concepts of motion. It provides an opportunity to enhance
student understanding of the role of scientific models by comparing Ptolemaic, Copernican,
Keplerian, and Newtonian planetary theory. It is worth emphasizing that this historical sequence
involves much more than a change in the inferred architecture of the planetary system. The gradual
acceptance of the Copernican, and later the Keplerian, system was one of several circumstances that
stimulated intense scientific interest in the problem of motion during the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries. Not until the publication of Newton’s Principia did dynamical theory regain compatibility
with planetary theory. With the consolidation of the Newtonian system, even the standards for what a
scientific model should do had changed dramatically.
The constant change in human understanding of the universe is very disturbing for students who
just want to know what is “right.” An understanding of this constant change should be a central issue
in any general education science course. Excellent background material can be found in the first 15
chapters of Foundations of Modern Physical Science by G. Holton and D. H. D. Roller (Addison-
Wesley, 1958) and in The Copernican Revolution by Thomas Kuhn (Harvard University Press, 1957).
The introductory section and Astronomer’s Toolbox 2-1 deal with the efforts of ancient
astronomers to observe and describe planetary motions. The geocentric theories, which were origi-
nated by the ancient Greeks, were based on the assumptions that the Earth is stationary and that the
motion of celestial objects is uniform motion on a circular path. A class discussion of the obser-
vational basis for these assumptions can lead students to examine the scientific merit of these early
cosmologies. Their acquaintance with the celestial sphere/ecliptic model in Chapter 1 will help stu-
dents to recognize the viability of a geocentric point of view for explaining diurnal motions and sec-
ular solar or lunar motions. A brief summary of the Aristotelian theory of motion is necessary if
students are to appreciate that the reliance upon deferents, epicycles, and other Ptolemaic structures
was neither arbitrary nor bizarre. By carefully contrasting the Aristotelian and Newtonian perspec-
tives, an instructor can enhance student understanding of both and reveal the extent to which “com-
mon sense” is substantially Aristotelian, whereas Newtonian concepts are nontrivially abstract.
A discussion of archaeoastronomy and such sites as Stonehenge (Great Britain) or Chimney Rock
(Colorado) will develop the students’ appreciation for pre-modern astronomy. Discussion of the need
for accurate calendars in early civilizations will provide an understanding of the applied nature of
ancient astronomy.
Section 2-1 introduces the Copernican heliocentric system in the context of planetary configu-
rations. The description of retrograde motion in the Copernican system is quite different from that in
the geocentric system, and this difference should be emphasized. In addition, the differences between
sidereal and synodic periods should be discussed. Note that, whereas the synodic period is directly
measurable, the sidereal period is not. Indeed, the sidereal period is a Copernican theoretical construct
that plays no role in the Ptolemaic model; if one assumes a heliocentric model, the sidereal period
assumes a counterfeit degree of “obviousness” absent in a geocentric framework. It is worth
emphasizing to students that Copernicus advocated his model primarily on mathematical, aesthetic,
and philosophical grounds. The archive of astronomical observations available to him and his
contemporaries was explained just as successfully by the Ptolemaic model as by his heliocentric
model. Astronomical tables (predictions) based on the Copernican model did provide a better match
to later observations, but it is easy to understand why scientifically conservative contemporaries did
not rush to embrace the new model.
Tycho’s observations mentioned in Section 2-2 were crucial for further progress in understanding
the structure of the solar system because they were the most accurate observations ever performed.

Gravitation and the Waltz of the Planets

 19

Remind students that the telescope had not yet been invented. Despite being a great observer, Tycho
was not a great human being. Students are often fascinated with Tycho’s lifestyle and therefore a
short discussion of it sparks their interest.
Kepler’s laws of planetary motion are presented in Section 2-3. The following classroom demon-
stration can be helpful in showing the properties of ellipses but also in developing a feeling for this
difficult concept, which Kepler had solved. Use a 9″ by 15″ Styrofoam block and map tacks as an
ellipse maker. Make a loop of string to generate a circle with a radius equal to 4 inches. Mark foci at
half-inch intervals along a horizontal line to generate ellipses, using several pens of different colors.
The circle and ellipses have eccentricities equal to 0, 0.14, 0.33, and 0.6 for the first four figures.
Generate these in front of the class and compute the eccentricities. Most students find it peculiar that
the first two ellipses look like circles. Mark one of the foci for each ellipse with the appropriate
colored pen. Have the students compare the eccentricities of planetary orbits given in Table A-1
(Appendix at the end of the book) with those of the ellipses generated. The result is that all planetary
orbits correspond to low-eccentricity ellipses that are almost indistinguishable from eccentric circles,
that is, circles with the Sun located at a position offset from the center by an amount proportional to
the eccentricity. Note that the use of eccentric rather than concentric circles allowed Hipparchus and
Ptolemy to explain, for instance, the variation in apparent solar orbital speed (indicated by the
unequal subdivision of the solar year by equinoxes and solstices) without abandoning the dynamical
principal of uniform circular motion. It is instructive to point out that Kepler’s laws constitute an
empirical description of planetary motion but provide no physical explanation. Their descriptive
success, however, stimulated Newton’s search for an adequate dynamical theory. For Kepler and
many of his contemporaries, that search was for a plausible tangential force that weakened with
distance from the Sun. Newton was the first to recognize that a radial force was required to account
for planetary orbits.
Galileo’s telescopic observations (Section 2-4) provide an excellent example of the use of obser-
vations to test a scientific theory. The discovery of Jupiter’s Galilean satellites removed the unique-
ness of the Earth as a second center of motion in the Copernican system. The sequence of phases and
apparent sizes of Venus were shown by Galileo to be consistent with a heliocentric but not with a
geocentric cosmology. This critical test should be carefully demonstrated with a light source and
sphere. Be careful to investigate an adequate sample of Venus’s orbital positions in each system,
identifying the configuration, apparent size, and phase of the planet at each position.
Newton’s laws of motion (Section 2-5) require careful attention because most students cling to a
quasi-Aristotelian conceptual picture even after lengthy (and, from the instructor’s perspective, lucid)
discussion. Recent research in physics education has provided pedagogically useful insights into the
nature and persistence of the conceptual difficulties experienced by most students when they first
encounter Newtonian kinematics and dynamics. Instructors who hope to convey substantial
understanding of these topics will find an invaluable commentary on this research in Guide to
Introductory Physics Teaching by Arnold Arons (Wiley, 1990). Lecture demonstrations with rolling
balls, moving carts, and so on are helpful in assuring that the students appreciate the difference
between velocity and acceleration. The concept of a force is relatively easy for students to grasp;
however, the idea of forces acting without contact is somewhat foreign at first. They will accept this
idea because of their previous exposure to gravity as the explanation for falling bodies.
In one respect, the law of inertia is easily demonstrated by using a feather and a coin in a tube,
which can be evacuated by means of a vacuum pump. (This experiment was performed by Apollo
astronauts on the Moon, using a feather and a hammer, and is available on film loops or videodiscs.)
Yet, the idea that external forces are always required for the persistence of motion is very difficult to
overcome. The robustness of this Aristotelian preconception illustrates how difficult it is for most
students to acquire the full Newtonian perspective. It is important in lectures to examine
“commonsense” experience, for instance, by identifying the “hidden” forces due to wind resistance

Gravitation and the Waltz of the Planets

Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
 1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute
this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the
Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,

performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™
works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or

providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
 about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who

notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that
s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of

any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project

Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different
terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain
permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend

considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on,
transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright
law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite
these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the
medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,”
such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt
data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other
medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -

Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic
work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for
damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU
AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE,
STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH
OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR
ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If

you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you
paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you
received the work from. If you received the work on a physical
medium, you must return the medium with your written
explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu
of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or
entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.
If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund
in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set

forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’,
WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied

warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the

Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of

Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the

assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project

Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500

West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to

the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws

regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states

where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot

make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current

donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project

Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several

printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by
copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus,
we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any
particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,

including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear
about new eBooks.