Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hs 2050 This Is Me Now Template
Hs 2050 This Is Me Now Template
● Something significant I learned: Something significant I learned about patient autonomy and
paternalism is the direct correlation it has with the principle of agency. Everyone is born with the
ability to act for themselves or be their own agent. When applying this to individuals' healthcare,
I also believe they have a right to choose what kind of care they receive. Often, when a parent
decides on their child's healthcare—taking away their agency—the parent thinks they are
benefiting from their child. This is false it can be very damaging to the patient and their health. It
leads to a rupture in physician-patient trust, which often causes patients to be hesitant to follow
their doctor's medical advice. In the end, taking away their autonomy and making healthcare
decisions for them can end up being damaging, even if there are good intentions.
● How my opinion has been affected: I have always believed that the principle of autonomy was
important. However, my opinion has been more affected by the negative aspects of being
autonomous. My grandma is sick and doctors and medicine make her extremely nervous.
Because of this, she frequently rejects any treatment that articles on Google have told her could
be bad. She has gone on extreme diets and avoided vital medications making her even more sick.
Her doctors have granted her autonomy which has not been beneficial for her. Although her
doctors should not practice paternalism, they do need to ensure that they are doing good and not
doing harm. This principle seems to be very situational. I do believe, however, that autonomy
● Description of how my ability to discuss/analyze issues related to this topic has improved:
Through learning about paternalism and patient autonomy I now have a better understanding of
what my choices for my healthcare are. While I have never been in a medical situation that
patient autonomy is ever tested. I know the rights I have as a patient and the rules I should follow
as a medical professional for my future patients. I will not allow a family member or physician to
Informed Consent
● Something significant I learned: I learned that informed consent is an active way that we can
practice autonomy. I used to think that informed consent consisted of just signing a paper stating
you agree with the treatment that is being offered. However, there is much more to it. A patient
can only give informed consent if they are competent to decide, receive an adequate amount of
information, understand what is explained, voluntarily accept treatment without coercion, and
personally consent to receive it. This shows that receiving the consent of a patient is a serious
matter that must be addressed with delicacy and understanding. Sometimes people reject a
treatment simply because they do not understand why it would be beneficial to them. Physicians
must take time to help their patients receive the necessary information so they can make
● How my opinion has been affected: It shocked me to know that there are moral theories that say
patient is not competent to decide on treatment, a trusted individual should do so. When the
patient is fully competent to choose, they should be given adequate information and ability to do
so. The idea of therapeutic privilege does not sit well with me. I would not want a doctor to
decide that withholding relevant information would protect me from harm. I believe that
knowledge is power and no one can make a full, voluntary decision if they don’t understand the
full scope of the situation. Therapeutic privilege is a principle that should not be practiced within
healthcare.
● Description of how my ability to discuss/analyze issues related to this topic has improved: Now
that I have learned more about the importance of informed consent, I believe I can better teach
others they have the right to reject treatment. I did not know that patients had the right to deny
treatment, regardless of their diagnosis. I don’t think this is common knowledge, and I think it
lets patients know their rights. If someone does not want to go through a certain treatment or take
a certain medication, they do not have to. We are never trapped when it comes to our healthcare.
Human Research
● Something significant I learned: Something significant I learned is that there are regulations put
in place for clinical trials. Although the trials are not perfect, it is comforting to know that there
is some involvement to stop people from being mistreated when they participate in them.
developing countries. The idea of providing life-saving treatment for people in developing
countries is great, however, once that treatment is developed after the trial, it is difficult to
continue providing it for those who participated. This means that after all the treatments for the
trial, when performing clinical trials in developing countries, we are just using them as a means
to an end. Something needs to change to ensure we can continue helping these people who
sacrifice themselves for science so that other sick patients can benefit from the results of the trial.
● How my opinion has been affected: Regarding human research, I agree with the view of Kantian
Ethics. Placebo groups should not be used if a working alternative exists. That would mean
actively choosing to not treat a sick patient even when a working treatment is available. That is
not permissible. I also agree that informed consent is crucial when it comes to clinical trials or
any type of research on humans. The story of Willowbrook and the Tuskegee Syphilis
experiment opened my eyes to the reality of what can happen when experimenting on humans is
done in the wrong way. For the children of Willowbrook, they were truly treated as a means to
an end. There was no cure for Hepatitis at the time, I acknowledge the need for clinical trials to
be done. However, the horrible conditions the patients were living in and making them drink
chocolate milk contaminated with feces was completely impermissible. Additionally, with the
Tuskegee Syphilis experiment, they did not give their informed consent for this experiment. The
patients were not fully informed of what was going on, therefore, they could not give full
consent. Even after a cure was found for Syphilis, they were not treated. I believe that clinical
trials are necessary to find answers, but they must be regulated. We cannot repeat the same,
● Description of how my ability to discuss/analyze issues related to this topic has improved: My
ability to discuss and analyze issues related to human research has improved as I have learned of
the terrible human experiments that have occurred throughout history. Specifically, Willowbrook
and the Tuskegee Syphilis experiments. I now recognize and am grateful for how far we have
come as a country to better our clinical trials. For example, it is nice to know that if anyone gives
their consent to participate in a clinical trial, they can choose to stop being a part of it at any
moment. Additionally, things like the Belmont Report that focuses on respect of persons,
beneficence, and justice are great examples of the safeguards and moral principles in place. Now
that I am aware of this, I feel more comfortable participating in a clinical trial later on if it is
● Something significant I learned: The only thing I was previously aware of regarding euthanasia
was the practice of “pulling the plug” on someone who is on life support and has no chance of
recovery, which I learned is a form of passive euthanasia. I also discovered that euthanasia and
physician-assisted suicide are much more common than I realized. I was unaware that at least 10
● How my opinion has been affected: Before this class, I did not have an opinion on this issue
because I honestly did not know that it existed. I now have a firm belief that passive euthanasia,
in special circumstances, is permissible; however, I believe that both active euthanasia and
physician-assisted suicide are wrong. A vital reason why I am against active euthanasia is
because I believe that a physician must do good for the patient and help them to live, not die. A
main reason why I am against physician-assisted suicide is that many times, people with
disabilities are known for deciding to use it because they feel that they cannot suffer any longer
in that state. By supporting that, we are telling every person within that community that their life
is too hard, and it’s okay if they are done living. If someone without a disability were to say that
to us, we would do everything we could to help them see their life is worth living. This double
standard should not exist. Rather than providing ways for individuals with disabilities to die, we
● Description of how my ability to discuss/analyze issues related to this topic has improved: After
suicide, I have developed a newfound compassion for those who are suffering more than they
believe they can handle. Due to this increased awareness about euthanasia and physician-assisted
suicide, I now feel more prepared to handle any situation that may arise if I have a family
member considering these options. Rather than responding with shock or anger, I can respond
with compassion and assist them in exploring alternative options, such as palliative care.
● Something significant I learned: The most significant thing I learned about this topic was that
racism does not exist solely because different races exist. We as human beings are the ones who
have created these racialized groups and have claimed one race to be inferior to another.
Additionally, I was surprised to discover that people of the same “race” are not physically and
biologically the same. People within the same race vary so drastically in their genetic makeup
that we cannot medically treat all of them the same way. This brings about an enormous issue
when physicians practice race-based medicine. This entails treating patients by using race as a
factor in determining appropriate treatment. For black people, physicians are taught that they
have a higher pain tolerance and that they are less likely to carry the breast cancer gene.
Although this may be true among some, this leads to many black people not receiving proper
pain relieving treatment or breast cancer screenings early on. There are many other discrepancies
that people of color receive but those are the ones that stood out to me the most.
● How my opinion has been affected: This new information has greatly affected my opinion of the
healthcare system. I knew our healthcare system was not perfect. Regardless, it frustrates me to
see that the constant racism we have seen throughout history is still unfortunately practiced
today. Especially, in the exact place where we are supposed to do no harm and act in the best
interest of the patient. Medical professionals using racial biases is horrific and should never
happen.
● Description of how my ability to discuss/analyze issues related to this topic has improved: After
studying this topic, I have decided to be an example to others of never allowing someone's race
to decide the kind of treatment or respect they receive from me. I plan to become an X-ray
technician within the next few years and want every one of my patients to know that I will
provide them with the best care I can offer, no matter who they are. Serious change must occur
within our healthcare system and society, in general, to ensure that people of all races receive the
care they deserve. This kind of change must start with a shift in the individual's mindset, which
numerous ideas and topics that I have never before considered or taken the time to understand. For
example, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide were topics that I didn’t even know existed. I knew
that “pulling the plug” was a term that many use, but I didn’t realize the bioethical issue occurring
within the healthcare field regarding how people want to leave this world with dignity. A better
understanding of important topics like these will help me greatly later in my life when I am called to
face related challenges with my present and future family members and friends.
The world of bioethics intrigues me. There are so many differing moral theories and ideas that
one must take into consideration when dealing with difficult situations like triage or abortion. There
does not seem to be one right answer for any bioethical topic. Individually, we must choose for
ourselves based on our beliefs, experiences, and the continuous information we receive, to know what is
best for our lives and what is the most morally correct. It is interesting to note that throughout history
and into our present day, morality is constantly evolving and will continue to do so.
Before this class, I did not feel comfortable discussing topics that could bring up any sort of
“contention” or differing opinions. For example, I used to completely avoid any conversation
surrounding abortion because I didn’t know why I thought the way I did and how to appropriately
discuss it without getting defensive. Due to this class, I can better share what I believe regarding
controversial, and bioethical topics and listen to what others think, even if I don’t agree. It is important
to have an open mind and be willing to understand why others think the way they do. What I know and