Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Complexometry Determination Hardness of
Complexometry Determination Hardness of
V. Basic Theory
A. Complexometry
pKa-2 = 0.0
pKa-1 = 1.5
pKa1 = 2.0
pKa2 = 2.66
pKa3 = 6.16
pKa4 = 10.24
It is important to realize that the electron pairs of the carboxylic acid groups
of EDTA are only available to the metal ion when the acid is dissociated. This
means that the effectiveness of the complexing agent is strongly affected by pH.
At low pH EDTA will be in the acid form and will not be an effective complexing
agent. Additionally, many metal ions form complexes with hydroxide ions.
Hydroxide ions compete with the chelating agent for coordination sites in the me-
tal ion. Therefore, the effectiveness of the complexing agent will also be reduced
at high pH. For a given chelating agent and metal ion, there will be an optimum
pH for the titration which will depend on the pK a values for the chelating agent
and the formation constants for the metal-hydroxide complexes.
Indicators
To carry out metal cation titrations using EDTA, it is almost always neces-
sary to use a complexometric indicator to determine when the end point has been
reached. Common indicators are organic dyes such as Fast Sulphon Black, Erio-
chrome Black T, Eriochrome Red B, Patton Reeder, or Murexide. Color change
shows that the indicator has been displaced (usually by EDTA) from the metal
cations in solution when the end point has been reached. Thus, the free indicator
(rather than the metal complex) serves as the endpoint indicator.
EBT indicators
The structure of Eriochrome Black T are shown below
OH OH
-
O3S N N
NO2
EBT is blue in a buffered solution at
pH 10. It turns red when Ca2+ ions (Underwood, 1998)
Chelate metal formed with Eriochrome Black T molecule with the disappe-
arance of hydrogen ions from phenolate –OH and formation bonding bet-
ween metal ion and oxygen atoms and also azo-group. This indicator
forming red wine stable complex 1:1 with some cations, such as Mg 2+, Ca2+,
Calmagnite
Most metallochromic indicators also are weak acids. One consequence of
this is that the conditional formation constant for the metal–indicator com-
plex depends on the titrand’s pH. This provides some control over an indi-
cator’s titration error because we can adjust the strength of a metal–indica-
tor complex by adjusted the pH at which we carry out the titration. Unfor-
tunately, because the indicator is a weak acid, the color of the uncomplexed
indicator also changes with pH.
Figure beside, for example, shows the
color of the indicator calmagite as a
function of pH and pMg, where H2In–,
HIn2–, and In3– are different forms of the
uncomplexed indicator, and MgIn– is the
Mg2+–calmagite complex. Because the
color of calmagite’s metal–indicator com-
EDTA titration mostly succeeds in every cations. There are some procedure
which used in this kind of analytic gravimetric:
Direct Titration
It is the simplest and the most convenient method used in chelometry. In
this method, the standard chelon solution is added to the metal ion solution
until the end point is detected. This method is analogous to simple acid-base
titrations. E.g.-calcium gluconate injection, calcium lactate tablets and
compound sodium lactate injection for the assay of calcium chloride
(CaCl2.6H2O). Limitations -slow complexation reaction -Interference due
to presence of other ions
Back Titration
In this method, excess of a standard EDTA solution is added to the metal
solution, which is to be analyzed, and the excess is back titrated with a
standard solution of a second metal ion. E.g. - Determination of Mn. This
metal cannot be directly titrated with EDTA because of precipitation of
Mn(OH)2. An excess of known volume of EDTA is added to an acidic
solution of Mn salt and then ammonia buffer is used to adjust the pH to 10
and the excess EDTA remaining after chelation, is back titrated with a
standard Zn solution kept in burette using Eriochrome blackT as indicator.
This method is analogous to back titration method in acidimetry. e.g.- ZnO
Replacement Titration
In this method the metal, which is to be analyzed, displaces quantitatively
the metal from the complex. When direct or back titrations do not give
sharp end points, the metal may be determined by the displacement of an
equivalent amount of Mg or Zn from a less stable EDTA complex.
Indirect Titration
This is also known as Alkalimetric titration. It is used for the determination
of ions such as anions, which do not react with EDTA chelate. Protons from
disodium EDTA are displaced by a heavy metal and titrated with sodium
alkali.
Mn+ + H2X-2 → MX (n-4) + 2H+
Figure: End point for the titration of hardness with EDTA using EBT as an indicator; the indicator is: (a) red WINEprior to
the end point due to the presence of the Ca2+–indicator complex; (b) grey-blue at the titration’s end point; and (c) blue after
the end point due to the presence of uncomplexed indicator.
Softening of hard water is done by altering the pH of the water reducing the
concentration of the metal ions present.Could be performed in two phases: Basic pH
for ions with high Kf e.g. Ca2+ and Mg2+
A. Tools B. Materials
1. Ipi vitamin bottle 1. Distilled water
2. Colored bottle 2. Seawater
3. Measuring flask 100 mL 3. AgNO3
4. Burette 4. NaCl p.a
5. Erlenmeyer 250 mL 5. K2CrO4
6. Pipettes 6. K2CrO4 5%
7. Volumetric pipette
8. Pikno mass
9. Measuring glass
-weighed -weighed
B.
Determining (standardization) of Na-EDTA ±0,01 M with CaCl2 as standard solution
-Weighed accurately
-Moved to volumetric flask 100 ml using water
-Added HCl 6 M drop by drop until the gas
stopped (the bubble disappear)
-Dilute with water until boundary line
-Shaked well
CaCl2 ± 0,01 M solution
-Titrated
10 ml of water
sample (PDAM)
Na-EDTA ± 0,01 -Entered to volumetric flask 300 ml
M solution
-Added 5 ml of buffer solution (pH:10)
-Entered to burette -Added 3 drops of EBT indicator
-Titrated
A.
Determining (standardization) of Na-EDTA ±0,01 M with CaCl2 as standard solution
We use CaCO3 pure analyte to make standard solution CaCl2. Weight accurately
0.0811 gram of CaCO3 p.a (white powder). Moved to volumetric flask 100 ml using water
but not until boundary line, after that add HCl 6M (colourless solution) drop to drop until
the gases is stop.
Before added HCl the solution is turbid but after added HCl the solution becomes
colorless.The function of adding HCl is to making loosen carbon dioxide, because from
this reaction carbon dioxide which can be seen in the bubble form, calcium chloride, and
water will be formed. If the bubble has completely gone, it means the CaCl2 has been
formed and it can be used to standardization as the analyte.
Based on the expe- Based on the theory: Metal ion indicator indicator-metal
riment: the addition of EBT is blue in a buffered
(colorless) (blue) complex(wine-red)
EBT changes the solu- solution at pH 10. It turns
2+
tion to red wine solu- red when Ca ions
tion
The concentration of Na-EDTA in the first trial is 0.0122 M, in the second trial is
0.0124 M and the third is 0.0123 M. So, the average concentration of Na-EDTA is
0,01M
This application is determine the hardness of water. Here we are using sample of
PDAM water which we took from Ketintang Wiyata region. The PDAM water is used
as the analyte and EDTA as a titer. First, enter 10 ml of sample to Erlenmeyer. Next,
adding 2 ml of buffer solution pH=10. The function of the buffer solution pH= 10
addition because in pH 8-10 is a range where dominant form of EBT is in form blue
HIn2- and this titration of CaCl2 and Na-EDTA is in a basic condition during titration.
Buffer solution will defend the pH because this titration needs the constant pH to make
titration process stable. After that add 3 drops of EBT. The solution changes color from
colorless to red wine. It is suitable with the theory because EBT has red wine in color
(shown in picture below).
The reason why using this indicator is
because this indicator forming red wine stable
complex 1:1 with some cations such as: Mg2+,
Ca2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+. Since this titration has
purpose to determine the level of Ca2+ in the
sample, so EBT is suitable to be used in this
experiment
The reaction is:
Based on the expe- Based on the theory:
riment: the addition of EBT is blue in a buffered Ca2+ + In3- ⇄ CaIn-
EBT changes the solu- solution at pH 10. It turns
tion to red wine solu- red when Ca2+ ions Metal ion indicator indicator-metal
tion
(colorless) (blue) complex(wine-red)
The next step is determining the hardness of water for each concentration from the
calculation we done before. But, first we have to calculate the mass of Ca 2+ in the
sample using equation:
mass of Ca 1000
M sample= × × dilution factor
Ar Ca 100
In the first trial with concentration of sample is 0,0049 M we get mass of Ca 2+ in the
sample is 0,00196 g. After that calculate the level of Ca2+ in the sample using equation:
Mass of Ca
Level of Ca2+ in water sample ¿
v sample
And we get the level of Ca2+ is 196 ppm. For the second trial, the mass of Ca 2+ in the
sample is 0,00188 g and the level of Ca 2+ in the sample is 188 ppm. Meanwhile, for the
third trial the mass of Ca 2+ in the sample is 0,00184 g and the level of Ca 2+ in the
sample is 184 ppm. So the average level Ca2+ in the sample is 189 ppm.
Adding ammonium chloride to this adds lots of extra ammonium ions. According to
Le Chatelier's Principle, that will tip the position of the equilibrium even further to the
left.
The solution will therefore contain these important things:
lots of unreacted ammonia;
Other things (like water and chloride ions) which are present aren't important to the
argument.
Most, but not all, of the hydrogen ions will be removed. The ammonium ion is weakly
acidic, and so some of the hydrogen ions will be released again.
Hydrogen ions can combine with these hydroxide ions to make water. As soon as this
happens, the equilibrium tips to replace the hydroxide ions. This keeps on happening
until most of the hydrogen ions are removed.
Again, because you have equilibria involved, not all of the hydrogen ions are
removed - just most of them.
Because the ammonia formed is a weak base, it can react with the water - and
so the reaction is slightly reversible. That means that, again, most (but not all) of the
the hydroxide ions are removed from the solution.
1. At a very high pH values, hydroxide ions can penetrate layers of metal coordination,
and complexes such as Cu(OH)Y3- may arise. Clear that in line with the decrease in
pH, the equilibrium moves away, the pH value below by EDTA titration of copper is
not feasible. Solution of the metal ions to be titrated with EDTA buffered to pH
constant despite the release of H3O+ when the complex is formed. At high pH metal
ions tend to hydrolyze and even precipitate as hydroxide.
2. ppm of CaCO3
Molek of sample = Molek Na-EDTA
M1 x V1 = Me xVe
M1 x 100 ml = 0,01016 M x 15,28 ml
M1 = 0,00155 M
Determination hardness of water of sample (PDAM)
mass of Ca 1000
M sample= × × dilution factor
Ar Ca 100
mass of Ca 1000
0,00155= × ×1
40 100
Mass of Ca2+ = 0,0621 g
Mass of Ca 0,0621
Level of Ca2+ in water sample ¿ = =¿0,000621 g/mL
v sample 100
= 621 mg/L
= 621 ppm
ppm MgCO3
Mass of Mg 0,0254
Level of Mg2+ in water sample ¿ = =¿ 0,000254 g/mL
v sample 100
= 254 mg/L
= 254 ppm
XI. Referencess
Day, R.A, Jr & Underwood, A.L. 2002. Analisis Kimia Kuantitatif: Edisi keenam..
Translated Iis Sopyan. Jakarta: Erlangga
Noname.2013.Complexometry, (online),
(http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/complexometry , accessed on December
19th, 2014)
Svehla, G.(1985). Vogel: Buku Teks Analisis Oraganik Kualitatif Makro dan
Semimikro.(first edition). Translated Setiono, L and Handayana, P.A Jakarta:
Kaliman Media Pusaka.
Tim Kimia Dasar. 2014. Panduan Praktikum Kimia Analitik I Dasar-Dasar Kimia
Analitik. Surabaya: Jurusan Kimia FMIPA Unesa
A.
Determining (standardization) of Na-EDTA ±0,01 M with CaCl2 as standard solution
A.
Determining (standardization) of Na-EDTA ±0,01 M with CaCl2 as standard solution
0,0811g 1000
2 +¿= × ¿
100 100
MCa
2 +¿=0,00811 M ¿
MCa
M Na-EDTA : 0,0123 M
V Na-EDTA : V1= 4 ml
V2= 3,9 ml
V3= 3,8 ml
Determination the concentration of sample (PDAM)
Molek of sample = Molek Na-EDTA
M1 x V1 = Me xVe
M1 x 10 ml = 0,0123 M x 4 ml
M1 = 0,0049 M
Molek of sample = Molek Na-EDTA
M2 x V2 = Me xVe
M2 x 10 ml = 0,0123 M x 3,9 ml
M1 = 0,0047 M
Molek of sample = Molek Na-EDTA
M3 x V3 = Me xVe
M3 x 10 ml = 0,0123 M x 3,8 ml
M3 = 0,0046 M
0.0049+0,0047+ 0,0046
Average concentration of sample =
3
= 0,0047 M
Determination hardness of water of sample (PDAM)
mass of Ca 1000
M sample= × × dilution factor
Ar Ca 100
mass of Ca 1000
0,0049= × ×1
40 100
Mass of Ca2+ = 0,00196 g
Mass of Ca 0,0196
Level of Ca2+ in water sample ¿ = =¿ 0,000196 g/mL
v sample 10
= 196 mg/L
mass of Ca 1000
M sample= × × dilution factor
Ar Ca 100
mass of Ca 1000
0,0047= × ×1
40 100
Mass of Ca2+ = 0,00188 g
Mass of Ca 0,0188
Level of Ca2+ in water sample ¿ = =¿0,000188 g/mL
v sample 10
= 188 mg/L
= 188 ppm
mass of Ca 1000
M sample= × × dilution factor
Ar Ca 100
mass of Ca 1000
0,0046= × ×1
40 100
Mass of Ca2+ = 0,00184 g
Mass of Ca 0,0184
Level of Ca2+ in water sample ¿ = =¿0,000184 g/mL
v sample 10
= 184 mg/L
= 184 ppm
196+188+184
Average level of Ca2+ in sample (PDAM) =
3
=189 ppm